Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Jun 28.
Published in final edited form as: Biochem Soc Trans. 2023 Jun 28;51(3):897–923. doi: 10.1042/BST20210699

Structures and coordination chemistry of transporters involved in manganese and iron homeostasis

Shamayeeta Ray 1, Rachelle Gaudet 1
PMCID: PMC10330786  NIHMSID: NIHMS1907183  PMID: 37283482

Abstract

A repertoire of transporters plays a crucial role in maintaining homeostasis of biologically essential transition metals, manganese and iron, thus ensuring cell viability. Elucidating the structure and function of many of these transporters has provided substantial understanding into how these proteins help maintain the optimal cellular concentrations of these metals. In particular, recent high-resolution structures of several transporters bound to different metals enable an examination of how the coordination chemistry of metal ion-protein complexes can help us understand metal selectivity and specificity. In this review, we first provide a comprehensive list of both specific and broad-based transporters that contribute to cellular homeostasis of manganese (Mn2+) and iron (Fe2+ and Fe3+) in bacteria, plants, fungi, and animals. Further, we explore the metal-binding sites of the available high-resolution metal-bound transporter structures (Nramps, ABC transporters, P-type ATPase) and provide a detailed analysis of their coordination spheres (ligands, bond lengths, bond angles, and overall geometry and coordination number). Combining this information with the measured binding affinity of the transporters towards different metals sheds light into molecular basis of substrate selectivity and transport. Moreover, comparison of the transporters with some metal scavenging and storage proteins, which bind metal with high affinity, reveal how the coordination geometry and affinity trends reflect the biological role of individual proteins involved in homeostasis of these essential transition metals.

Introduction

All living cells require transition metals in low intracellular concentrations for various biological processes. Cellular metal levels are tightly regulated as imbalances in their optimal concentrations cause several diseases [1,2]. In this review, we focus on two abundant and essential transition metals, manganese and iron, neighbors on the periodic table and thus closely related. Manganese is a cofactor of vital enzymes including superoxide dismutase (SOD) which breaks down reactive oxygen species (ROS) and glutamate synthetase involved in mammalian brain development and function [3,4]. Manganese is also important in processes like bone and tissue growth, reproduction, and immune system function [5,6]. Manganese overload in the brain leads to a condition called ‘manganism’ with Parkinson-like symptoms [6-8]. In plants, manganese catalyzes photooxidation of water by photosystem II during light reactions and provides structural integrity to various photosynthetic proteins and enzymes [9-11]. Manganese is also crucial for bacterial survival and growth, and virulence of pathogenic bacteria [12,13]. During pathogenesis, manganese (with or without SOD) protects the microbes from host-mediated oxidative stress by detoxification of ROS [4,14].

Iron, in ionic form or as part of a complex, is an essential cofactor of proteins involved in many processes including oxygen transport and storage, electron transport and catalysis, cellular and oxygen metabolism, DNA synthesis and repair, cellular signaling, and host defense [15-17]. Iron deficiency causes restricted erythropoiesis and anemia [17-20]. Elevated iron is also problematic, for example in organs it causes tissue damage (hemochromatosis), in the blood it leads to atherosclerosis, and in the brain causes neurodegeneration [17,21,22]. In cyanobacteria, algae, and plants, iron is the predominant metal in the photosynthetic machinery, and it contributes to electron transport and chlorophyll biosynthesis [23-25]. In stress conditions, iron imbalances generate ROS and impair plant growth, photosynthesis, electron transport [10,25,26].

Organisms have evolved tightly regulated systems to maintain optimal metal concentrations in cellular compartments. The metal homeostasis machinery includes: (i) transporters and ion channels that import and export metals across otherwise impermeable cellular and organellar membranes, (ii) metallochaperones and chelators that store and retain metals in certain compartments, and (iii) transcription factors, sensors, and riboswitches that regulate the expression of genes encoding for the homeostasis machinery [27,28]. Metal homeostasis necessitates that this machinery can select appropriate metals over others [27-29]. The coordination chemistry, geometric preferences, and chemical properties—like atomic and ionic radii, electronegativity—of individual metals are key contributors to this specificity [2,27,30]. However, according to the Irving-Williams series (Zn2+ < Cu2+ > Ni2+ > Co2+ > Fe2+ > Mn2+), a transition metal ion higher in the series tends to form more kinetically or thermodynamically stable protein-metal complexes and can potentially displace metals that are downstream in the series [31,32]. Hence, transition metal transporters often have a broad substrate scope even when physiologically implicated in homeostasis of a particular metal [27,28,33,34].

In this review, we address the factors driving selective iron and manganese transport and homeostasis. We first explore the transporters and receptors that contribute to manganese and iron homeostasis in mammals, yeasts, plants, and bacteria. From the list, we analyze the structures of different manganese- and iron-bound proteins available at high resolution to understand how structures correlate to biological function and factors that drive metal ion selectivity. Detailed analysis of the metal coordination spheres and their deviation from ideal parameters for different bound metals illustrates how the protein discriminates its cognate substrates from non-physiological ones. Reviewing the published affinities of metals to different proteins (either Km or Kd), we find that they mostly, but not always, correlate to the ideality of the coordination geometries. Overall, we show that the combined knowledge of coordination structures and binding affinity can help understand the function of the key players involved in manganese and iron homeostasis.

Overview of manganese transporters in different organisms

Before we discuss the structural analyses, we briefly introduce the families of receptors and transporters—importers that bring substrates into the cytosol and exporters that ferry substrates from the cytosol to lumenal compartments or the extracellular space—implicated in manganese homeostasis. These players in manganese homeostasis are illustrated in Figure 1, listed in Table 1, and described by organism type below.

Figure 1. Transporters and receptors involved in manganese transport and homeostasis from bacteria to mammals.

Figure 1.

(A) A gram-negative bacterial cell surface is shown as a representative for gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria because most Mn2+ transporters are similar in both. Mn2+ is imported across the OM of gram-negative bacteria mainly through porin channels like MnoP [35,161]. The illustrated ABC transporters are a representative, but not exhaustive, list (see Table 1). (B) A diagram of a plant cell highlighting transporters on the cell surface and membranes of internal organelles that regulate intracellular Mn2+ levels. YSL (Yellow Stripe-Like) proteins transport Mn2+-chelates, all other transporters transport Mn2+ ions [9,11,44]. (C) A diagram of a fungal cell highlighting transporters in the plasma membrane and organellar membranes which impact Mn2+ homeostasis. Mn2+ ions internalized into mitochondria primarily bind MnSOD (manganese-dependent superoxide dismutase), which protects against oxidative stress [2,4,52,53]. Most transporters shown have been more extensively studied in yeasts [2,51,52]. (D) In a typical mammalian cell, many plasma-membrane transporters control the cellular Mn2+ levels. The transferrin receptors (TfR) capture Mn3+-bound transferrin and internalize it into endosomes where Mn3+ is converted to Mn2+ and transported into the cytosol by NRAMP2 [66,70,71,164]. Several transporters—some of which are not solely or even primarily dedicated to Mn2+ transport—have been implicated in Mn2+ homeostasis in the brain, including NRAMP2, ZIP8/14, ZNT10, SOC, TfR, NMDAR, glutamate transporters GLAST and GLT-1, HIP14/14L, ATP13A2, DAT, MCT [70,160,164]. In each panel, specific proteins of each transporter family are shown, and their corresponding family is indicated in the legend at the bottom (see Table 1).

Table 1.

Transporters involved in manganese homeostasis

Family Organism Transporter Function Representative
structurea
Nramp Bacteria MntH [12,13,34,136] Mn2+ import 8E60
Plants NRAMPXb [10,47,137,138] Mn2+ import at PM and vacuoles of roots and leaves 8E60
Fungic Smf1/2 [34,55,136] Mn2+ import across PM and ER membrane 8E60
Animals NRAMP2 [9,34,66,136,139] Mn2+ import into cytosol through PM and endosomes 8E60
Animals NRAMP1 [34,136] Import Mn2+ into cytosol at phagosomal membrane 8E60
ABC transporterd Gram-negative bacteria SitABCD [97,140], MntABC [89] Mn2+ import into cytosol and full virulence 4OXR
Gram-positive bacteria MtsABC [141], SloABC [142], PsaABC [31,74,143], EfaCBA [144], MntABC [13,33,145,146], SitABC [75] Mn2+ import into cytosol and virulence 3ZTT
CDF Bacteria MntE [147], MneP/S [13,148], EmfA [103], YiiP [36,37] Mn2+ export 2QFIe
Plants MTP1 [9,47,109] Mn2+ export from cytosol into vacuole of roots, leaves 6XPEe
Animals ZNT10 [67,92,139] Mn2+ export across PM in liver, intestine, and brain 6XPEe
P-type ATPase Bacteria MgtA, YoaB [12,13] Mn2+ export 7YAJ
Plants ECA1, ECA3 [9,47,109,149] Mn2+ uptake in ER (ECA1) and Golgi (ECA3) of roots 7YAJ
Fungic Pmr1p [2,51,52,55], Ypk9p [51,59], Cod1p [51,150] Mn2+ export from cytosol into Golgi (Pmr1p), vacuole (Ypk9p) and ER (Cod1p) 7YAJ
Animals SPCA1/2 [8,69] Mn2+ export from cytosol into Golgi 7YAJ
Animals ATP13A2 [3,68,71,139,151] Mn2+ export into lysosome in brain 7VPIf
ZIP Plants IRT1 [47,109], ZIP1/2 [11,45] Mn2+ import into cytosol from PM and vacuole (ZIP1) in roots 5TSBg
Fungic Atx2 [51,57,58,152] Mn2+ import into cytosol from Golgi 5TSBg
Animals ZIP8, ZIP14 [3,67,71,139] Mn2+ import across PM in liver and brain 5TSBg
CCC1 Fungic Ccc1 [9,55,153] Mn2+ export from cytosol into vacuole 6IU5e
Plants, Fungic VIT1/2 [48-50,138] Mn2+ export from cytosol into vacuoles and Golgi 6IU5e
MFS transporter Bacteria, Animals ferroportin [71,77,116,154] Mn2+ export 5AYMh
Fungic Pho84 [51,53,56,155] Mn2+ import into cytosol across PM 7SP5f
Animals MCT [71,156-158] Mn2+-citrate complex import into cytosol in brain 7JSJf
Cation exchanger Plants CAX2/4/5 [46,47,159] Mn2+ export out of cytosol into vacuole 4KPPi
Fungic Gdt1p [51,60,61] Mn2+ export out of cytosol into Golgi 4KPPi
Animals TMEM165 (36, 66, 67) Mn2+ export out of cytosol into Golgi 4KPPi
Ca2+ channel Animals SOC [3,66,71,160] Mn2+ import across PM in the brain 3JBRi
Porin Gram-negative bacteria MnoP [35,161] Mn2+ import through OM 2PORi
MntP type Bacteria MntP [12,13,43,148] Mn2+ export -
TerC type Bacteria YkoY [12,13,38] Mn2+ export -
Oligopeptide transporterd Plants YSL [9,11,44,53,162] Complexed manganese import at chloroplast, vacuole, and PM -
CYSTM Fungic MNC1 [55,163] Mn2+ chelation and import into cytosol -
Transferrin receptor Animals TfR [3,66,70,71,164] Internalization of Mn3+-transferrin 3S9Lh
Glutamate receptor Animals NMDAR [165-167] Mn2+ import into cytosol across blood-brain barrier 5UP2f
EAAT Animals GLAST [165,168], GLT-1 [165,169] Mn2+ import that causes neurotoxicity 6X12f
Palmitoyl acyltransferase Animals HIP14/14L [3,170,171] Mn2+ export from cytosol into Golgi in the brain 3EU9f
NSS Animals DAT [71,172,173] Mn2+ import into cytosol across PM in the brain 4XP1f
Mitochondrial carrier family transporter Fungic Mtm1 [52,62] Mn2+ import from cytosol into mitochondria 1OKCe
Mammals MFRN1/2 [28,72] Mn2+ import from cytosol into mitochondria 1OKCe
a

The most relevant representative structure, prioritizing high-resolution structures with bound Mn2+, then ones with other metal ions, then ones with no bound metal.

b

X is a number; plants generally have 5-7 numbered NRAMP homologs.

c

Fungi transporters are best characterized in yeasts, so yeast proteins are generally listed in this table.

d

Non-exhaustive list.

e

Structures with bound Zn2+.

f

Structures with no bound divalent ions at sites for transition metal transport.

g

Structure with bound Cd2+.

h

Structure with bound iron.

i

Structure with bound Ca2+.

Bacteria

Most importers and exporters contributing to manganese homeostasis are ubiquitously present in both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria (Figure 1A, Table 1). Mn2+ importers include ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters, such as SitABC and PsaABC, that use energy derived from ATP hydrolysis, and a Natural resistance associated macrophage protein (Nramp) homolog, MntH, that uses co-transported protons as an energy source [12,33,34]. In Bradyrhizobium japonicum, a porin, MnoP, is coregulated with MntH and assists in Mn2+ diffusion across the outer membrane (OM) during Mn2+ deprivation [27,35]. Mn2+ exporters include: cation diffusion facilitator (CDF) family H+ antiporters like MntE, MntP, and YiiP [36,37]; PII -type ATPases like YoaB and MgtA [12,13,27]; TerC-type proteins like YkoY [12,13,38]; MntP-type proteins; and the major facilitator superfamily (MFS) transporter FPN, a homolog of human ferroportin [39-41]. To maintain homeostasis, the expression levels of transporter genes are regulated by either or both riboswitches like yybP-ykoY [12,42] and transcription factors like MntR [12,43].

Plants

In plants, many transporters contribute to Mn2+ uptake through the roots and distribution in cells of various tissues and intracellular organelles (Figure 1B, Table 1) [9,11]. Mn2+ importers include Nramps like Oryza sativa (Os)Nramp3/5, Arabidopsis thaliana (At)Nramp1 (plasma membrane; PM) and AtNramp3/4 (vacuole) [9-11]. Yellow stripe-like (YSL) importers, belonging to oligopeptide transporter (OPT) family, mediate long-distance uptake of Mn2+ in complex with nicotianamine (e.g., AtYSL4/6, OsYSL2/6) [9,44]. Zrt-/Irt-like proteins (ZIPs) have a broad substrate scope including Zn2+, Fe2+, and Mn2+, with IRT1 (PM), ZIP1 (vacuole), and ZIP2 (PM) most strongly associated with Mn2+ import in A. thaliana [9,11,45]. The exporters that internalize Mn2+ in intracellular compartments include: cation exchangers (CAX) expressed in vacuoles in plants exposed to toxic Mn2+ levels (e.g., AtCAX2/4/5) [9,46]; CDFs (also known as MTP in plants; e.g., AtMTP11, OsMTP8.1) [9,47]; P-type Ca2+-ATPases like AtECA1 (endoplasmic reticulum; ER) and AtECA3 (Golgi) [9-11]; and vacuolar iron transporter (VIT) subfamily of Ca2+-sensitive cross complementer1 (CCC1) transporters in vacuoles and the Golgi (e.g., ATVIT1, OsVIT1/2) [48-50].

Fungi

The fungal Mn2+ homeostasis machinery has been most extensively studied in yeasts (Figure 1C, Table 1) [2,51]. Mn2+ importers include: Nramps like Smf1 (PM) and Smf2 (intracellular vesicles and ER) [52-54]; Mnc1, a CYSTM (non-secreted cysteine-rich peptide) family member that chelates manganese at the cell surface [55]; Pho84, a phosphate/proton MFS symporter which transports Mn2+ as MnHPO4 in high environmental Mn2+ conditions [56]; and a ZIP transporter, Atx2, traffics Mn2+ out of Golgi vesicles [51,57,58]. To limit cytosolic Mn2+, several exporters internalize Mn2+ into intracellular compartments: P-type ATPases Pmr1 (Golgi), Ypk9 (vacuole) and Cod1 (ER) [52,54,59]; CCC1 exporters Ccc1 (vacuole) [52-54]; CAX exporter Gdt1 (Golgi) [60,61] and the mitochondrial carrier (MC)-family exporter Mtm1 (mitochondria) [62].

Animals

Animals use manganese (Mn2+ or Mn3+) homeostasis machinery for several essential life processes and for nutritional immunity against invading pathogens (Figure 1D, Table 1) [7,28,39]. The immunity proteins include the Nramp-family namesake, NRAMP1, which extrudes Mn2+ and Fe2+ out of the phagosomes of macrophages into the cytosol to deplete the engulfed pathogens of essential nutrients [34,39,63]. Mn3+ is carried in the bloodstream by transferrin (whose preferred substrate is Fe3+) then internalized into endosomes by the transferrin receptor (TfR), where Mn3+ is released and converted to Mn2+ by STEAP metalloreductases [34,64,65]. The main Mn2+ importers are NRAMP2, involved in uptake from endosomes and the PM [66], and ZIP8 and ZIP14, importing Mn2+ preferentially over Zn2+ and Fe2+ across the PM [28,67]. The main Mn2+ exporters are: P-type ATPases ATP13A2 (Park9; lysosomes) [28,68] and SPCA1 (Golgi) [28,69]; CDF-family transporter ZNT10 (Zinc transporter 10) that preferentially exports Mn2+ over Zn2+ across the PM [28,53,67]; CAX-family TMEM165 (Golgi) [28,60,70]; and the MFS transporter, ferroportin [28,71] and the MC-family MFRN1 and MFRN2 that import Mn2+ into the mitochondria in Fe2+ deficiency conditions [28,72].

Manganese is vital to brain function and its dyshomeostasis induces neurological disorders [6,28,39]. Accordingly, the generic cell in Figure 1D also includes many channels and transporters that primarily shuttle other substrates but have been implicated in Mn2+ fluxes in brain tissues (reviewed in [6,73]). These include store-operated Ca2+ channels (SOCs), voltage-gated calcium channels, ionotropic glutamate receptors (NMDARs), the electrogenic amino acid transporter (EAAT) family of glutamate and glutamine transporters, the dopamine transporter (DAT), MFS-family monocarboxylate transporter (MCT), and Huntingtin-interacting proteins HIP14 and HIP14L (Mg2+ transporters expressed in the Golgi).

Structural insights into manganese transport

Transporters involved in Mn2+ homeostasis either use Mn2+ as their primary substrate but can also transport other transition metals (e.g., MntH, PsaABC, SitABC) [74-76], or moonlight as Mn2+ transporters, as do most Fe2+ transporters (e.g., TfR, ferroportin), sometimes under dyshomeostasis conditions [41,64,77], and some Zn2+ transporters (ZNT10, ZIP8/14) [67]. In both cases, it will be useful to understand what drives Mn2+ selection in a physiological context. Mn2+ prefers an octahedral geometry, with optimal bond lengths of 2.1-2.5 Å as ‘strong interactions’, although longer bond lengths of 2.5-3.0 Å can still participate in a coordination sphere as ‘weak interactions’ [78-80]. However, chelation of Mn2+ can be constrained by the protein structure to differ from ideal coordination geometry; it is therefore important to visualize Mn2+-interactions to understand how it influences function. Although several Mn2+ transporter structures are available, few are high-resolution metal-bound structures (Table 1 and 2). Recent high-resolution structures of ABC transporter SBPs, P-type ATPases and Nramps are beginning to shed light on the key factors that drive Mn2+ specificity [31,75,81]. We summarize this progress below, as well as sequence analyses that provide clues regarding Mn2+ specificity for transporters like ZNT10 and ZIP8/14 [67].

Table 2.

Coordination geometry of metals in the binding site of manganese transporters

Family Protein Organism Substrate PDB code (Resolution
in Å) [Reference]
Coordinating
atoms (number)
Coordination
geometry
RMSanglea
(°)
Binding affinityb
[Reference]c
Regulator MntR B. subtilis Mn2+ 1ON1 (1.75 Å) [84] NO5 (6) Octahedral 8 0.2 to 2 μM [83]
SBP of ABC transporter PsaA S. pneumoniae Mn2+ 3ZTTd (2.70 Å) [87] N2O2 (4) Octahedral (Tetrahedral) 20 (21) 3.3 ± 1.0 nM [87]
Zn2+ 1PSZ (2.00 Å) [74] N2O2 (4) Tetrahedral 13 231 ± 1.9 nM [87]
SitA S. pseudintermedius Mn2+ 4OXR (2.00 Å) [75] N2O4 (6) Octahedral 17 N.D.e [75]
Zn2+ 4OXQ (2.62 Å) [75] N2O4 (6) Octahedral 27 N.D.e [75]
P-type ATPase SPCA1 Homo sapiens Mn2+ 7YAJ (3.16 Å) [91] O5 (X) Square pyramidal 9 0.07 ± 0.01 μMf [90]
Ca2+ 7YAH (3.12 Å) [91] O6 (X) Octahedral 13 0.13 ± 0.01 μMf [90]
Nramp transporter MntH D. radiodurans Mn2+ 8E60 (2.38 Å) [81] SO5 (6) Octahedral 25 190 ± 30 μM
Cd2+ 8E6M (2.4 8Å) [81] SO5 (6) Octahedral 34 55 ± 15 μM
a

The angular deviation from ideal geometry, calculated as root mean squared deviation.

b

Affinities (Kd) were obtained using ITC unless otherwise specified.

c

References are listed only if they differ from those in the “PDB code" column.

d

In this review, we interpret the geometry as octahedral based on bond length cut-offs and the authors interpret it as tetrahedral.

e

ITC shows binding to both metals but due to fitting issues, exact Kd could not be determined, although reported to in nM range.

f

Apparent affinities (Km) were obtained using colorimetric ATPase assay.

MntR

We first set the stage by examining the structure of MntR, the bacterial transcription regulator of genes important for Mn2+ biology and homeostasis [43,82]. In contrast to transporters that interact with metal ions only transiently, MntR is effectively a switch regulated by high-affinity Mn2+ binding. MntR coordinates Mn2+ in a near-ideal octahedral geometry favored by Mn2+ (Figure 2A-C, Table 2) [83,84]. The metal-oxygen and metal-nitrogen coordinating bond lengths are within the ‘strong interaction’ range [78,85]. This near-ideal coordination of Mn2+ by MntR reflects its high affinity for Mn2+ (Kd of 0.2–2 μM) [83], and its function as a Mn2+-regulated switch.

Figure 2. Coordination chemistry impacts metal uptake in Mn2+ transporters.

Figure 2.

(A) Structure of a Mn2+ transport regulator, MntR, from Bacillus subtilis, bound to Mn2+ (PDB ID: 1ON1; [84]). (B) The six Mn2+ ligands form a near-ideal octahedral coordination sphere. (C) Schematic of ideal geometry for octahedral, tetrahedral, and square pyramidal coordination spheres. (D) Structure of an SBP bound to Mn2+ (PDB ID: 3ZTT; [74,87]). (E-F) Metal-binding site of PsaA bound to Mn2+ (E; PDB ID: 3ZTT) and Zn2+ (F; PDB ID: 1PSZ). Each coordination sphere has a distinct geometry consistent with the ion’s preference: octahedral for Mn2+ (although two metal-oxygen bonds are longer, grey) and tetrahedral for Zn2+ (with the same two oxygens now more distant). The geometry is less distorted for Zn2+ than Mn2+ (for either interpretation of the structure as a the tetrahedral-like or octahedral-like sphere), consistent with the Zn2+ complex being more stable (Table 2). These differences allow Mn2+, the primary substrate, to be released by PsaA and transported, whereas the Zn2+ complex locks PsaA in a transport-incompetent closed conformation [31]. (G-H) Metal-binding site of SitA bound to Mn2+ (G; PDB ID: 4ORX) and Zn2+(H; PDB ID: 4OXQ) [75]. Both metals are coordinated octahedrally, less distorted for Mn2+ compared to Zn2+ (Table 2), making Mn2+ a preferred substrate [75]. (I) Structure of a P-type ATPase, human SPCA1 (PDB ID: 7YAJ), involved in Ca2+ and Mn2+ uptake into Golgi, bound to Mn2+ [91]. (J-K) Metal-binding site of SPCA1 bound to Mn2+ (J; PDB ID: 7YAJ) and Ca2+ (K; PDB ID: 7YAH) [91]. Mn2+ binds in a square pyramidal and Ca2+ in an octahedral geometry. Although Mn2+ binds in a less favored coordination, the Mn2+ coordination sphere has shorter bond lengths and less angular deviation compared to the Ca2+ coordination, probably resulting in tighter binding than Ca2+ (Table 2). (L) Structure of bacterial Nramp (PDB ID: 8E60), a divalent transition metal importer [34,136], bound to its physiological substrate, Mn2+ [81]. (M-N) Metal-binding site of DraNramp bound to Mn2+ (M; PDB ID: 8E60) and Cd2+(N; PDB ID: 8E6M) [81]. The coordination sphere of both metals comprises six ligands. D56—a key residue in metal and proton transport conserved across the Nramp family [76,247]—binds Mn2+ and not Cd2+. The coordination is more distorted from ideal octahedral geometry and the bond distances are longer in the Cd2+ complex than in the Mn2+ complex (Table 2). These differences indicate that Nramps, with a broad substrate profile, display plasticity in substrate binding to transport metal ion substrates with different properties. The angular deviations from ideal geometry, calculated as root mean squared deviations (RMSangle), are indicated above each illustrated binding site.

SBPs

Structures of bacterial ABC transporter SBPs that import Mn2+Streptococcus pneumoniae PsaA Staphylococcus pseudintermedius SitA—bound to different metals shed light on their metal-binding properties (Figure 2D) [31,75]. Both Mn2+ and Zn2+ bind at the same site in PsaA. The coordination geometry has been assigned as tetrahedral in both cases [31], although two additional oxygens at 2.4 Å—still within the ‘strong interaction’ range [78-80]—can be included to the Mn2+ sphere to produce an alternative distorted octahedral coordination (Figure 2E-F, Table 2). Mn2+ prefers octahedral and Zn2+, tetrahedral geometry [27,30]. Thus, Mn2+ binds PsaA in a non-ideal coordination geometry and with greater angular deviations than Zn2+ (Table 2). Based on the metal-free structure of the transporter domain, PsaC, its proposed metal-binding site includes two aspartates and two histidines, potentially forming a coordination sphere similar to its SBP, PsaA [86]. Interestingly, PsaABC transports Mn2+ and not Zn2+ although both metals bind PsaA with high affinity (Kd = 3.3 ± 1.0 nM for Mn2+ and Kd = 231 ± 1.9 nM for Zn2+; Table 2) [87]. These data suggest that the binding-site distortions may enable the conformational switching between different states of PsaA essential for Mn2+ transport. In contrast, the ideal geometry and higher thermal stability of the Zn2+-bound PsaA complex indicate reduced conformational flexibility [31]. Thus, Zn2+ appears to lock PsaA in a closed state and prevents transport [31]. In sum, the coordination geometries of the PsaA-metal complexes are key for selective transport of Mn2+ over Zn2+ by PsaABC, but also make Staphylococcus pneumoniae susceptible to Zn2+, which can inhibit the acquisition of the essential metal Mn2+ [31,88].

In the SitA case, Mn2+ and Zn2+ are both octahedrally coordinated with the same ligands, a coordination geometry preferred by Mn2+ but not Zn2+ (Figure 2G-H, Table 2) [75]. Moreover, some bonds to Zn2+ are longer than the optimal 2.0–2.2 Å and the coordination sphere is more distorted for Zn2+ than Mn2+ (Table 2). Although SitA binds both metals in the nM range (Table 2), the coordination geometries indicate that its binding site is better adapted to accommodate Mn2+. The MntC SBP also binds its preferred substrate, Mn2+, in an ideal octahedral coordination [89].

These SBP structures demonstrate that selective Mn2+ transport by bacterial ABC transporters is likely related to how Mn2+ and potential competing substrates are coordinated by the SBP. However, formation of an ideal coordination sphere does not necessarily result in effective transport. For example, effective transport of Mn2+ likely also depends on how readily the Mn2+ can be released from the SBP by the transmembrane subunits of the transporter, at least in the case of PsaA.

P-type ATPase

Human SPCA1, a P-type ATPase that exports both Ca2+ and Mn2+ from cytosol into the Golgi, with similar Km values of 70 nM for Mn2+ and 130 nM for Ca2+ [90]. Cryo-EM structures of SPCA1 reveal how Ca2+ and Mn2+ bind with different geometry to the same site in the transmembrane domain (Figure 2I-K) [91]. Both metals bind with all oxygen ligands, with a 6-ligand octahedral geometry for Ca2+ and 5-ligand square pyramidal geometry for Mn2+ (Table 2), although in both cases, a potential water molecule ligand can be accommodated, which would generate a 7-ligand pentagonal bipyramid geometry commonly observed in Ca2+ coordination, and 6-ligand octahedral coordination for Mn2+. Bond lengths are smaller for Mn2+ than Ca2+ consistent with its smaller ionic radius. The small angular deviations and near-ideal bond length are consistent with the low Km values for both substrates.

Nramps

In the bacterial Deinococcus radiodurans (Dra)Nramp, the physiological substrate Mn2+ and the non-essential substrate Cd2+ bind the same site, both in an octahedral geometry (Figure 2L-N) [81], although octahedral and tetrahedral geometries are the preferred coordination for Mn2+ and Cd2+ respectively [27,30]. Moreover, the angular deviations are higher for Cd2+ (Table 2). The coordinating ligands also differ, with different water arrangements and the aspartate sidechain (D56) in a different rotamer such that it coordinates Mn2+ but not Cd2+. This lack of coordination is consistent with Cd2+ being a softer metal than Mn2+, with lower propensity to bind harder oxygen ligands. This aspartate is essential for both metal and associated proton transport [34], and its interaction with Mn2+ may provide a mechanism to coordinate proton and metal transport. Interestingly, some coordinating bonds for Mn2+, and even more for Cd2+, are longer than ideal (Figure 2M-N). Metal-oxygen distances of 2.1-2.5 Å for Mn2+ and 2.3-2.8 Å for Cd2+ (0.2 Å longer for metal-sulfur) are considered ‘strong interactions.’ However, longer bonds of 2.6-3.2 Å for Mn2+ (and accordingly for Cd2+) are occasionally observed and considered ‘weak interactions’ still important for the overall coordination geometry [78].

DraNramp has relatively low affinity for both metals with Kd values in the ~100 μM range (Table 2; [81]). These are consistent with the observed non-ideal bond lengths and angles. The higher affinity for Cd2+ than Mn2+ is, at first glance, counterintuitive considering that Mn2+ is the physiological substrate and it binds with closer-to-ideal geometry. However, a lower affinity may lead to more favorable metal release kinetics to continue the transporter cycle. These data also suggest that information on substrate-binding affinity is useful, but often does not provide the full picture and additional factors are at play, like the energetics of the protein conformation.

Another interesting observation from the structures of DraNramp in different conformations is that the physiological substrate, Mn2+, binds at the same site but with different coordination geometries across the various biologically relevant conformations of its transport cycle (Figure 3) [81]. DraNramp is the only transporter for which Mn2+-bound structures are available in multiple conformations. All three (outward-open, occluded, and inward-open) conformations have octahedral Mn2+ coordination with substantial angular deviations. Interestingly, the bond lengths are longer and angular deviations are larger in the inward-open which is primed to release Mn2+ into the cytosol (Figure 3).

Figure 3. Coordination sphere changes across different conformations of an Nramp family Mn2+ transporter.

Figure 3.

Structures of a bacterial Nramp (DraNramp) in three metal-bound conformations of the Mn2+ transport cycle—outward-open (PDB ID: 8E6N), occluded (PDB ID: 8E60) and inward-open (PDB ID: 8E6L)—shows that Mn2+ binds at the same site but with a unique coordination geometry in each of the three states [81]. Except for D56, N59 and M230, the bonding ligands vary across conformations along with the bond distances and the angular deviation (reported as RMSangle). The coordination is most distorted in the inward-open conformation, which can facilitate Mn2+ release. These differences indicate that metal coordination can change not only for different substrates, but for different conformations of the protein bound to the same substrate.

CDF and ZIP transporters

While most CDF-family ZNT exporters selectively transport Zn2+, ZNT10 is implicated in Mn2+ transport in mammals [28,67]. A structure of Zn2+-bound human ZNT8 (Figure 4A), a Zn2+ transporter, confirms that the conserved HD-HD motif comprising two aspartates and two histidines forms the Zn2+-binding site (Figure 4B) [67,92]. In the absence of experimentally determined ZNT10 structures, sequence analysis suggests that an asparagine replaces one histidine to yield a ND-HD metal-binding motif [67]. This substitution may provide a hard oxygen ligand to bind the harder Mn2+ ion, and the asparagine could also form a bidentate interaction to expand its coordination sphere (Figure 4C).

Figure 4. Mn2+ binding by ZNT and ZIP transporters.

Figure 4.

(A) Structure of human ZNT8 (PDB ID: 6XPE), bound to Zn2+ in different domains [92]. (B) Zn2+-binding site of the ZNT8 transmembrane domain with Zn2+ coordinated to two aspartates and two histidines in a tetrahedral geometry, a HD-HD motif conserved in most mammalian ZNTs [92]. (C) AlphaFold model of human ZNT10, a Mn2+ transporter, showing the residues analogous to the ZNT8 Zn2+-binding site with an asparagine (N43) replacing one of the histidines, now forming a ND-HD motif [67,248,249]. Asparagine likely provides a favorable oxygen ligand and a possibility for Mn2+ to expand its coordination geometry from tetrahedral to preferred octahedral in ZNT10 [67,92]. (D) Structure of BpZIP, a bacterial ZIP transporter (PDB ID: 5TSA), showing a bound Zn2+ at the transport site [93]. (E) Topology diagram of human LIV-1 subfamily ZIP transporters, showing that Zn2+ is transported between TM4 and TM5, which contains the conserved metalloprotease motif (HEXPHEXGD) [67]. (F) On TM5 of ZIP8 and ZIP14, the first histidine is replaced by an asparagine, which likely enables these transporters to transport Mn2+ in addition to Zn2+ [67,93,250]. In all panels, Zn2+ is shown as a blue and Mn2+ as a magenta sphere.

Among the mammalian ZIP family of Zn2+ importers, ZIP8 and ZIP14 can transport both Mn2+ and Zn2+ [67,93]. Structure of a bacterial ZIP transporter reveals the Zn2+ transport site (Figure 4D) [93], but in absence of human ZIP structures, sequence analyses provide clues about how ZIP8 and ZIP14 can transport Mn2+ [67,93]. Similarly, to the ZNT case above, in ZIP8 and ZIP14 a glutamate replaces the first histidine in the HEXPHEXGD motif conserved in TM5 of LIV-1-subfamily ZIPs (Figure 4E-F) [67]. This glutamate could provide one or two additional oxygen ligands to a Mn2+ coordination sphere.

Overview of iron transporters in different organisms

The key players in iron (Fe2+/Fe3+) homeostasis include transporters that transport iron in ionic or in complex form into and out of the cells and its compartments and receptors that bind and transport iron-bound complexes to their appropriate destinations (Figure 4, Table 3). Owing to the similarity in metal ion properties, there is a substantial overlap between iron and manganese transporters [28,64]. Since we have already introduced these overlapping transporters in the section on manganese transporters above, we will focus below on the proteins that are exclusively involved in iron homeostasis.

Table 3.

Transporters involved in homeostasis of iron

Family Organism Transporter Function Representative
structurea
Nramp Plants NRAMPXb [10,47,137,138,174] Fe2+ import into cytosol at PM, vacuole, and chloroplast 8E60c
Fungid Smf1/3 [2,34,136] Fe2+ import into cytosol at PM (Smf1) and vacuole (Smf3) 8E60c
Mammals NRAMP1 [34,136,154,175] Import of Fe2+ from phagosomes into cytosol 8E60c
Mammals NRAMP2 [34,136,154,175,176] Fe2+ import into cytosol at PM, endosomes, and lysosomes 8E60c
ABC transporter Gram-negative bacteriae YbtPQ [177], YfeABCD [97,132,178], Irp6/7 [33,179], SfaABC [94,140,180], ViuPDGC [125,131], FhuCDB [131,181], FbpABC [27,182] Fe2+ import and virulence 1Y4T
Gram-positive bacteriae Pit1/2 [183,184], IrtAB [185,186], PiaABC [131,187], FeuABC [124,131], MtsABC [133] Complexed Fe2+ import and virulence 3HH8
Plants IDI7 [47,107,109] Fe2+ import into cytosol from vacuolar tonoplast of leaves, stem, and flower 6G7P
Plants ATM3 [105,188,189] STA1 [106,190,191] Fe2+ import into cytosol from mitochondria and biogenesis of Fe-S cluster 7N58f
Fungid Abc3 [110,192,193] Heme import into cytosol from vacuole 3HH8
Mammals ABCB7 [120,154,188,194,195] Complexed Fe2+ export from mitochondrial matrix 7VGFf
Mammals ABCG2 [120,196,197] Complexed Fe2+ export at PM 6VXFf
CDF Bacteria YiiP [102], EmfA [103] Fe2+ export 2QFIg
ZIP Plants IRT1/2 [47,105,109] Fe2+ import at PM (IRT1 and IRT2) and vacuole (IRT2) 5TSBg
Mammals ZIP8, ZIP14 [15,17,119] Import of free Fe2+ at PM 5TSBg
CCC1 Plants VIT1 [49,50,138,198] Fe2+ export from cytosol into vacuoles 6IU9
Fungid Ccc1, Pcl1 [2,110,113] Fe2+ export from cytosol into vacuoles 6IU9
MFS transporter Fungid Arn1-4, Sit1, Enb1, Taf1, Str1/3 [2,94,110-112,199] Internalization of Fe3+-siderophore (Arn1-4, Sit1, Enb1, Taf1, Str1) / Fe2+-heme (Str3) 5AYM
Mammals FLVCR1a/1b/2 [16,21,120,154,200] Export out of (FLVCR1a) and import into (FLVCR1b/2) cytosol of heme bound Fe2+ at PM (FLVCR1a/2) and mitochondria (FLVCR1b) 5AYM
Plants FPN2 [105,108] Fe2+ import into vacuole from cytosol 5AYM
Mammals, bacteria FPN [15,41,77,100,101,116,154,175,201] Fe2+ export out of cytosol across PM and regulation of hepcidin 5AYM
Mammals HCP1 [21,22,94,202,203] Import of Fe2+-heme into cytosol at PM 5AYM
Calcium channel Mammals LTCC [28,118,204,205] Import of free Fe2+ into cytosol across PM 3JBRg
Porin Gram-negative bacteria Fe2+ porin [27,95] Import of Fe2+ across OM 2PORh
Oligopeptide transportere Plants YSL [26,206] Complexed-iron transport across chloroplast, vacuole, ER and PM -
Permease Plants PIC1 [25,105] Fe2+ export from cytosol into chloroplast 6C9Wg
Fungid Ftr1, Fip1 [2,94,110], Fet4 [2,94,110,207] Fe3+ (Ftr1, Fip1) or Fe2+ (Fet4) import into cytosol across PM 6C9Wg
Fungid Fth1, Ftr2 [2,110] Fe3+ import into cytosol from vacuole 6C9Wg
Mammals HRG1 [16,17,94,208,209] Transport of Fe2+-heme into cytosol from PM, endosomes, and lysosomes 6C9Wg
Transferrin/Lactoferrin receptor Gram-negative bacteria TbpA/TbpB [94,210,211] Import of Fe3+-transferrin into periplasm across OM 3V89
Mammals TfR1/2 [65,119,154,212], LfR [95,213-215] Internalization of Fe3+-transferrin (TfR1/2), H-ferritin (TfR1/2) and lactoferrin (LfR) 3S9L
Gram-negative bacteria LbpA/LbpB [94,210,211] Import of Fe3+-lactoferrin into periplasm across OM 7JRD
Heme receptor Bacteriae IsdABCH [94,126,216], HmuTUV [131,217], PhuTUV [127,131], TBUT heme receptors [218-221] Import of Fe2+-heme into periplasm across OM 2Q8Q
Fungid Shu1 [110,192,222] Import of Fe2+-heme into cytosol 2Q8Q
Mammals CD91 [17,223,224] Import of Fe2+-heme in complex with hemopexin into cytosol across PM 2Q8Q
Hemoglobin receptor Mammals CD163 [17,223,225,226] Import of hemoglobin bound Fe2+ in complex with haptoglobin into cytosol across PM 6K0Lg
Siderophore receptor Bacteriae Fe3+-siderophore receptors [123,131,227-230] Internalization of Fe3+-siderophore across OM 4HMQ
Mammals 24p3 [120,231,232] Fe3+- siderophore import into cytosol across PM 3K3Lg
Ferritin receptor Mammals Tim-2 [120,154,233,234] H-ferritin import into cytosol across PM 2OR7
Mammals Scara-5 [120,154,233,234] L-ferritin import into cytosol across PM 7BZZ
Mammals SFT [154,173,235,236] Tf-dependent and independent iron uptake into cytosol across PM in the intestine -
G-protein coupled transporter Gram-negative bacteria FeoB [94,98,99,237-239] Fe2+ import into cytosol across IM 3K53g
TonB Gram-negative bacteria TonB-ExbB-ExbD [94,96,240] Energizes transport of iron-complexes from OM to IM (TonB) 2GSK
Energizes transport of iron-complexes from OM to IM (ExbB-ExbD) 5ZFP
Mitochondrial carrier family transporter Fungid Mrs3/4 [2,110,114,115] Fe2+ export from cytosol into mitochondria 1OKCg
Mammals MFRN1/2 [16,154,241-243] Fe2+ export from cytosol into mitochondria 1OKCg
TRP channel Mammals TRPML1 [119,120,244,245] Fe2+ export from endosomes and lysosomes into cytosol 5WJ5g
a

The most relevant representative structure, prioritizing high-resolution structures with bound iron, then ones with other metal ions, then ones with no bound metal.

b

X is a number; plants generally have 5-7 numbered NRAMP homologs.

c

Structures with bound Mn2+.

d

Fungi transporters are best characterized in yeasts, so yeast proteins are generally listed in this table.

e

Non-exhaustive list.

f

Structures with no bound divalent ions at sites for transition metal transport.

g

Structures with bound Zn2+.

h

Structures with bound Ca2+.

Bacteria

Iron is transported across the bacterial membrane mostly in complex form and sometimes in ionic Fe2+ form (Figure 5A, Table 3). In gram-negative bacteria, Fe3+-siderophores, Fe2+-heme, and Fe3+-transferrin iron is trapped at the OM by β-barrel protein receptors [27,29,94]. The TonB-ExbB-ExbD system energizes iron transport from the OM receptors across the periplasm to the inner membrane (IM) [27,95,96]. In both gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria, SBPs capture the complexed (siderophore with Fe3+ and heme with Fe2+) and ionic (transferrin with Fe3+) iron and their associated ABC transporters import iron into the cytosol [29,95,97]. Ionic Fe2+ in gram-negative bacteria is imported by OM porins and then by a GTPase, FeoB, across the IM [95,98,99]. Fe2+ export across the IM is mediated by the MFS-family transporter, FPN [41,100,101]; and the CDF-family YiiP and EmfA transporters [102,103].

Figure 5. Transporters and receptors involved in iron transport and homeostasis from bacteria to mammals.

Figure 5.

(A) A gram-negative bacterial cell surface (left) highlighting outer membrane (OM) and inner membrane (IM) proteins involved in transporting Fe2+ and Fe3+ either as ions or as complexes (siderophore, transferrin, heme). The periplasmic-spanning complex TonB-ExbB-ExbD energizes transport of iron from the OM to the IM [27,94,96,240]. Most of the iron transport across the IM occurs through ABC transporters [27,29,94,95]. A G-protein coupled transporter, FeoB, enables Fe2+ import across IM [98,99,237,238]. Ferroportin (Fpn), an MFS family transporter, exports Fe2+ across the IM [41]. CDF transporters, YiiP and EmfA, are also implicated in Fe2+ export [102,103]. In gram-positive bacteria (right), iron import is mediated by PM ABC transporters with SBPs that directly capture iron ions or complexes [15,27,33,94]. The illustrated ABC transporters are a representative, but not exhaustive, list (see Table 3). (B) In a plant cell, iron ions are mainly transported across the cell membrane and organellar membranes by the transporters shown here [25,105,174,190]. (C) A representative fungal (yeast) cell highlighting proteins involved in ionic (Fe2+/Fe3+) and complexed (siderophore, heme) iron transport [2,94,110]. (D) In a typical mammalian cell, iron homeostasis is maintained by a combination of receptors—that bring iron in through endocytosis of heme, hemoglobin, transferrin, ferritin—and PM and organellar transporters [17,21,34,120]. (E) In a macrophage, iron is imported from phagosomes to the cytosol to deplete them of micronutrients as a strategy to kill engulfed pathogens, primarily by NRAMP1. A range of transporters and receptors also maintain the intracellular iron levels in macrophages [16,34,119,175]. In panels (C-E), some, but not all, oxidases and reductases that help in Fe2+-Fe3+ interconversion during transport are shown (see text). In each panel, specific proteins of each transporter family are shown, and their corresponding family is indicated in the legend at the bottom (see Table 3).

Plants

Previously introduced Mn2+ transporters also involved in iron homeostasis in plants include: YSL importers (PM, chloroplast, vacuole, ER) [25,104]; Nramp importers (PM, chloroplast, vacuole) [47,104,105]; importer IRT1 (PM) [24,105]; and VIT1 exporting Fe2+ into the vacuole [25,105]; (Figure 5B, Table 3). In addition, ABC transporter ATM3 exports iron from the mitochondria [24,105,106] and ABC transporter IDI7 imports Fe2+ from the vacuole into cytosol [47,107]; MFS-family FPN2 [105,108] and ZIP-family IRT2 [47,105,109] export Fe2+ from cytosol into vacuoles; and the PIC1 permease imports Fe2+ into the chloroplast stroma [25,105] (Figure 5B, Table 3).

Fungi

As with Mn2+, the fungal iron homeostasis machinery is best understood in yeasts (Figure 5C, Table 3). Key importers include: permeases Ftr1/Fip1 (PM) and Fth1/Ftr2 (vacuole) import Fe3+ [2,110]; permease Fet4 imports Fe2+ [2,94]; Nramp-family Smf1 (PM) and Smf3 (vacuole) import Fe2+ [2,34,94]; MFS-family Str3 (PM), heme receptor Shu1 (PM), ABC transporter Abc3 (vacuole), all import heme [110]; MFS-family Arn1-4, Sit1, Str1, Ernb1 Taf1 import Fe3+-siderophores across the PM [94,110-112].CCC1-family Ccc1 and Pcl1 export Fe2+ into vacuoles [2,110,113]. Finally, mitochondrial carrier (MC)-family Mrs3/4 import Fe2+ into the mitochondrial matrix [2,114,115].

Animals

Iron homeostasis in animals has many players that enable fluxes of free iron ions and iron complexes like Fe2+-heme and Fe-S clusters (Figure 5D and Table 3). Here we focus on proteins with major roles in transporting non-heme iron. In animals, iron primarily circulates as Fe3+-transferrin, which captured at the cell surface by TfR1/2 and internalized into endosomes [28,65,116]. Fe3+ from transferrin and other endocytosed complexes is released in acidic endosomes, converted to Fe2+ by reductases like STEAP3, and Fe2+ is then imported by NRAMP2 into the cytosol [21,34,116]. Cytosolic Fe2+ is either taken up in the mitochondria by MC-family MFRN1/2 for Fe-S cluster biogenesis and energy production, stored in ferritin for future use, or exported across the PM by ferroportin [17,101,117]. Additional Fe2+ importers include: ZIP8/14 (PM) [28]; the Ca2+ channel LTCC (PM) [28,118]; and the non-selective cation channel TRPML1 (endosomes and lysosome) [119,120].

Iron is central to the antimicrobial and erythrophagocytosis activities of macrophages. The iron transporters in macrophage cells are a subset of a regular animal cell, with the important addition of NRAMP1 at the phagosomal membrane that plays a key role in nutritional immunity, depriving phagocytosed pathogens of Fe2+ as it does for Mn2+ (Figure 5E) [34,121].

Structural insights into iron binding and transport

Iron is transported across membranes either as ions (Fe2+/Fe3+) or bound to heme or chelators like siderophores [65,122,123]. For these iron complexes, iron remains tightly bound to the respective chelator through the membrane transport process. In contrast, ionic forms of iron need to interact transiently with their transporters to enable rapid cycles of binding and release. Both Fe2+ and Fe3+ prefer octahedral geometry, with optimal bond lengths of 2.0-2.5 Å, although ‘weak interactions’ of 2.5-3.0 Å can still participate in a coordination sphere [78,80,85]. Here, we compare the coordination geometry and binding affinity of different iron binding sites, including ionic and complexed forms, to understand whether these properties help explain the distinct physiological functions of different transporters.

Siderophores, Heme and Transferrin

Structures of iron chelator complexes reveal near-ideal coordination geometry, consistent with their extremely high affinity for iron (Figure 6, Table 4). For example, the vibriobactin siderophore and heme (with contributions of the heme receptor protein PhuT) coordinate Fe3+ and Fe2+, respectively, octahedrally with optimal bond lengths and minimal angular deviation (Figure 6A-B, Table 4) [124-127]. Most siderophores are hexadentate and do not require additional interacting residues from the host proteins to complete Fe3+-octahedral coordination. An exception is tetradentate unsaturated siderophores captured by the periplasmic binding protein CeuE from Campylobacter jejuni. CeuE uses a histidine and a tyrosine to complete the near-ideal coordination of Fe3+ [128] (Table 4). Human transferrin—which mediates circulation of the poorly soluble Fe3+ in blood plasma while limiting levels of free Fe3+—binds Fe3+ with very high affinity (Kd ~ 10−21 M) [129]. Correspondingly, the Fe3+-transferrin also has near-perfect octahedral coordination geometry (Figure 6C, Table 4) [130]. According to the HSAB (hard and soft acid and base) theory, Fe3+ is a hard ion, and its ideal coordination sphere contains mostly hard oxygen ligands (with one nitrogen in both Fe3+ complexes illustrated in Figure 6). In contrast, Fe2+, a softer metal ion, and a heme provides four nitrogen ligands—with nitrogen being a softer ligand than oxygen.

Figure 6. Iron coordination in different receptors and transporters correlates to their biological function.

Figure 6.

(A) Schematic representation of ideal geometry for octahedral and triagonal bipyramidal coordination spheres. (B-F) Structures showing Fe2+ or Fe3+ ions coordinated by six ligands in an octahedral geometry. The structures are: the Vibrio cholerae siderophore receptor ViuP with its vibriobactin siderophore bound to Fe3+ (B; PDB ID: 3R5T; [125]), the Pseudomonas aeruginosa heme receptor PhuT with a bound Fe2+-heme and residues Y71 and R228 completing the octahedral coordination (C; PDB ID: 2R79; [127]), human transferrin bound to Fe3+ (D; PDB ID: 3VE1; [130]), the metal-binding domain (MBD) of the Eucalyptus grandis vacuolar iron transporter 1 (VIT1) bound to Fe2+ (E; PDB ID: 6IU9; [50]), the SBP of a Yersinia pestis ABC transporter, Yfe1, bound to Fe3+ (F; PDB ID: 5UYE; [132]). (G) Bdellovibrio bacteriovorus ferroportin (BbFPN) bound to Fe2+ (PDB ID: 5AYM; [41]). Five ligands coordinate Fe2+ in a distorted triagonal bipyramid (Table 4; [41]). BbFPN is most distorted of all the iron coordination complexes (Table 4). The extent of distortion generally correlates with the biological function in that the chelators and binders need to bind iron with high affinity so that the metal is not released until the chelators reach their destination, whereas a lower affinity enables the transporters to transport metal readily. The angular deviations from ideal geometry, calculated as root mean squared deviations (RMSangle), are indicated above each illustrated binding site.

Table 4.

Coordination geometry of iron in the binding site of transporters and receptors

Family Protein Organism Substrate PDB code
(Resolution in Å)
[Reference]
Coordinating
atoms
(number)
Coordination
geometry
RMSanglea
(°)
Binding affinityb
[Reference]c
Siderophore receptor ViuP V. cholerae Fe3+-vibriobactin 3R5T (1.45 Å) [125] NO5 (6) Octahedral 7 -
FeuA B. subtilis Fe3+-enterobactin 2XUZ (1.90 Å) [124] O6 (6) Octahedral 7 ~10−51 Md [246]
CeuE C. jejuni Fe3+-catecholamide 5AD1 (1.32 Å) [128] NO5 (6) Octahedral 6 -
Heme receptor PhuT P. aeruginosa Fe2+-heme 2R79 (2.40 Å) [127] N5O (6) Octahedral 6 -
Transferrin hTf H. sapiens Fe3+ 3VE1 (2.96 Å) [130] NO5 (6) Octahedral 14 ~10−21 Me [129]
MBD of VIT transporter VIT1 E. grandis Fe2+ 6IU9 (3.00 Å) [50] SO5 (6) Octahedral 7 1.9 ± 0.4 μMf [49]
SBP of ABC transporter YfeA Y. pestis Fe3+ 5UYE (2.09 Å) [132] N2O4 (6) Octahedral 22 17.8 ± 4.4 nM for Mn2+ [134]
MtsA S. pyogenes Fe2+ 3HH8 (1.87 Å) [133] N2O4 (6) Octahedral 22 4.3 μMg
Ferroportin transporter BbFPN B. bacteriovorus Fe2+ 5AYM (3.00 Å) [41] O5 (5) Triagonal Bipyramidal 30 195 μM for Co2+
a

The angular deviation from ideal geometry, calculated as root mean squared deviation.

b

Affinities (Kd) are for iron (Fe2+ or Fe3+ as indicated in the “Substrate” column) and obtained using ITC, unless otherwise specified.

c

References are listed only if they differ from those in the “PDB code" column.

d

Kd obtained using visible spectroscopy.

e

Kd obtained using equilibrium dialysis studies.

f

Kd obtained using intrinsic protein fluorescence quenching.

g

Kd obtained using equilibrium dialysis and ICP-MS.

Metal-binding domains of transporters

VIT1 (vacuolar iron transporter 1), is primarily involved in iron export into vacuoles of plant and fungal cells, although it also transports other transition metals including Co2+, Zn2+, Mn2+ [49]. VIT1 has a cytosolic metal-binding domain (MBD) that is thought to capture iron before its eventual transfer to the transmembrane transport domain. A structure of the Eucalyptus grandis VIT1 MBD shows Fe2+ bound in a near-ideal octahedral coordination (Figure 6D, Table 4) [50]. However, the 4-Å bond to M149—a residue essential for metal transport—is longer than expected for a strong bonding interaction. Consistent with this observation, a Kd value of 1.9 ± 0.4 μM for Fe2+ binding to full-length VIT1 [49] suggests that none of its Fe2+-binding sites are as ideal as those of the chelators and binding proteins described above.

The SBPs of iron-specific ABC transporters also trap iron before transferring it to the transport module [131], and the iron binding geometry and affinity reveal a similar trend as that of VIT1. A representative SBP (YfeA, SBP of the iron importer YfeABC from Yersinia pestis) binds Fe3+ in its preferred octahedral coordination, but with angular distortions and some longer bond lengths (Figure 6E, Table 4) [132]. Again, similarly to VIT1, YfeA and MtsA (a Fe2+ SBP from Streptococcus pyogenes) have metal-binding affinities in the nM to low μM range (Table 4) [133,134].

Ferroportin

The bacterial ferroportin homolog Bdellovibrio bacteriovorus (Bb)FPN is the only protein for which we have a high-resolution structure with iron bound in the transmembrane transport domain. A structure of human ferroportin (FPN) bound to Co2+ provides clues of its Fe2+ binding and transport mechanism [135]. However, in absence of Fe2+-bound structures, we do not further discuss the human FPN structure. In BpFPN, Fe2+ binds in a non-ideal trigonal bipyramidal geometry with a high angular deviation and all coordinating bond lengths are longer than ideal (Figure 6F, Table 4). Moreover, BbFPN binds Co2+ (a transported substrate similar to, but more stable in solution, than Fe2+) with a Kd of 195 μM [41,77]. This affinity is similar to that observed for DraNramp and Mn2+. Mfrn1 from Oreochromis niloticus, another Fe2+ transporter, also display low affinity (Kd of 450 μM for Fe2+) [72]. Imperfect coordination geometry (bond angles and lengths) and poor binding affinity may be instrumental for ensuring conformational transitions and metal mobility required for transport.

Conclusions

The available Mn2+ transporter structures reveal that diverse coordination geometry and ligand type can enable Mn2+ binding and transport. Furthermore, distinct binding site structures result in different mechanisms for selectivity. Interestingly, in different Mn2+ transporters, either deviations from ideal bonding geometry or number of coordinating ligands allow both Mn2+ release and conformational changes seem to be required for transport to be kinetically accessible.

Similarly, analyses of the iron binders, chelators, and transporters show how both the ion binding properties and affinity correlate with the biological role of each type of iron interaction, with the binders (chelators and transferrin) having near-ideal coordination and much higher affinity towards iron compared to the transporters like BbFPN, and binding domains of transporters (SBPs and the VIT1 MBD), falling somewhere in between binders and canonical transporters.

Another general observation is that when comparing the binding of different metals to the same protein, affinity often poorly correlates with how ideal the coordination geometry is. This suggests that other energetic contributions are at play, such as conformational changes of the protein to accommodate the metal. Binding of a metal ion may cause a conformational change in the protein that incurs an energetic penalty, affecting the overall affinity of the protein for the metal. Furthermore, this conformational change may be on- or off-pathway in terms of the physiological function of the protein. For example, in DraNramp, the protein binds Mn2+ in a closer-to-ideal geometry than Cd2+ does, but that seems to come with some energetic cost because its affinity for Mn2+ is lower than that for Cd2+. In the case of PsaA, binding of Zn2+ is high affinity, but Zn2+ is not transported by PsaABC, presumably because the resulting PsaABC structure is not conducive to the next conformational steps in the transport cycle.

Overall, this review highlights how atomic-level knowledge of the coordination chemistry of different transition metals can help us understand the function of proteins in Mn2+ and iron homeostasis and how the transport behavior of the proteins may change during dyshomeostatic conditions.

Perspectives.

  • The transition metals iron and manganese are essential to life, but toxic in high abundance. Metal ion homeostasis relies on a whole array of receptor, storage, regulatory, and transport proteins. Membrane transporters transiently interact with the metal ions to shuttle them into and out of cells and between cellular compartments, enabling both organismal and cellular metal homeostasis.

  • Metal binding affinity and selectivity relies on the combination of how close the coordination geometry and ligands can approach ideal parameters, and how much conformational strain is induced in the protein to produce the resulting coordination geometry.

  • There are still few examples of high-resolution structures of metal transporters in complex with metals. Additional structures are needed, as are studies of the metal binding thermodynamics and the protein conformational energy landscape, to fully understand and control the homeostatic machinery of manganese and iron.

Acknowledgements

We thank members of the Gaudet lab for discussion and feedback. This work was funded by NIGMS grant R01GM120996 (R.G.).

References

  • 1.Pajarillo EAB, Lee E, Kang D-K (2021) Trace metals and animal health: Interplay of the gut microbiota with iron, manganese, zinc, and copper. Anim. Nutr 7, 750–61 10.1016/j.aninu.2021.03.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bleackley MR, MacGillivray RTA (2011) Transition metal homeostasis: from yeast to human disease. Biometals. 24, 785–809 10.1007/s10534-011-9451-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Chen P, Bornhorst J, Aschner MA (2018) Manganese metabolism in humans. Front. Biosci 23(9), 1655–1679 10.2741/4665 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Candas D, Li JJ (2013) MnSOD in Oxidative Stress Response-Potential Regulation via Mitochondrial Protein Influx. Antioxid. Redox Signal 20, 1599–617 10.1089/ars.2013.5305 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Studer JM, Schweer WP, Gabler NK, Ross JW (2022) Functions of manganese in reproduction. Anim. Reprod. Sci 106924 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2022.106924 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Budinger D, Barral S, Soo AKS, Kurian MA (2021) The role of manganese dysregulation in neurological disease: emerging evidence. Lancet Neurol. 20, 956–68 10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00238-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Chen P, Chakraborty S, Mukhopadhyay S, Lee E, Paoliello MM, Bowman AB, et al. (2015) Manganese homeostasis in the nervous system. J Neurochem. 134, 601–10 10.1111/jnc.13170 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Harischandra DS, Ghaisas S, Zenitsky G, Jin H, Kanthasamy A, Anantharam V, et al. (2019) Manganese-Induced Neurotoxicity: New Insights Into the Triad of Protein Misfolding, Mitochondrial Impairment, and Neuroinflammation. Front. Neurosci 13 10.3389/fnins.2019.00654 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Socha A, Guerinot ML (2014) Mn-euvering manganese: the role of transporter gene family members in manganese uptake and mobilization in plants. Front. Plant Sci 5. 10.3389/fpls.2014.00106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Devanna BN, Jaswal R, Singh PK, Kapoor R, Jain P, Kumar G, et al. (2021) Role of transporters in plant disease resistance. Physiol. Plant 171, 849–67 10.1111/ppl.13377 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Li J, Jia Y, Dong R, Huang R, Liu P, Li X, et al. (2019) Advances in the Mechanisms of Plant Tolerance to Manganese Toxicity. Int. J. Mol. Sci 20 10.3390/ijms20205096 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Waters LS (2020) Bacterial manganese sensing and homeostasis. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol 55, 96–102 10.1016/j.cbpa.2020.01.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bosma EF, Rau MH, van Gijtenbeek LA, Siedler S (2021) Regulation and distinct physiological roles of manganese in bacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Rev 45 10.1093/femsre/fuab028 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Abreu IA, Cabelli DE (2010) Superoxide dismutases—a review of the metal-associated mechanistic variations. Biochim Biophys Acta Proteins Proteom. 1804, 263–74 10.1016/j.bbapap.2009.11.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Guo S, Frazer DM, Anderson GJ (2016) Iron homeostasis: transport, metabolism, and regulation. Curr. Opin. Clin. Nutr. Metab. Care 19, 276–81 10.1097/mco.0000000000000285 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Knutson MD (2017) Iron transport proteins: Gateways of cellular and systemic iron homeostasis. J. Biol. Chem 292, 12735–43 10.1074/jbc.R117.786632 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Liu Q, Wu J, Zhang X, Wu X, Zhao Y, Ren J (2021) Iron homeostasis and disorders revisited in the sepsis. Free Rad. Biol. Med 165, 1–13 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2021.01.025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Peace JM, Banayan JM (2021) Anemia in pregnancy: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Int. Anesthesiol. Clin 59, 15–21 10.1097/aia.0000000000000320 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Naito Y, Masuyama T, Ishihara M (2021) Iron and cardiovascular diseases. J. Cardiol 77, 160–5 10.3390/2Fph12030125 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Rana S, Prabhakar N (2021) Iron disorders and hepcidin. Clin. Chim. Acta 523, 454–68 10.1016/j.cca.2021.10.032 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zeidan RS, Han SM, Leeuwenburgh C, Xiao R (2021) Iron homeostasis and organismal aging. Ageing Res. Rev 72, 101510 10.1016/j.arr.2021.101510 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Koleini N, Shapiro JS, Geier J, Ardehali H (2021) Ironing out mechanisms of iron homeostasis and disorders of iron deficiency. J. Clin. Investig 131 10.1172/jci148671 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Pilon M, Cohu CM, Ravet K, Abdel-Ghany SE, Gaymard F (2009) Essential transition metal homeostasis in plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol 12, 347–57 10.1016/j.pbi.2009.04.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Connorton JM, Balk J, Rodríguez-Celma J (2017) Iron homeostasis in plants - a brief overview. Metallomics 9, 813–23 10.1039/c7mt00136c [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kroh GE, Pilon M (2020) Regulation of iron homeostasis and use in chloroplasts. Int. J. Mol. Sci 21, 3395 10.3390/ijms21093395 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Zhang X, Zhang D, Sun W, Wang T (2019) The Adaptive Mechanism of Plants to Iron Deficiency via Iron Uptake, Transport, and Homeostasis. Int. J. Mol. Sci 20 10.3390/ijms20102424 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ma Z, Jacobsen FE, Giedroc DP (2009) Coordination Chemistry of Bacterial Metal Transport and Sensing. Chem. Rev 109, 4644–81 10.1021/cr900077w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Liu Q, Barker S, Knutson MD (2021) Iron and manganese transport in mammalian systems. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Res 1868, 118890 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2020.118890 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Krewulak KD, Vogel HJ (2008) Structural biology of bacterial iron uptake. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Biomembr 1778, 1781–804 10.1016/j.bbamem.2007.07.026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Rulísek L, Vondrásek J (1998) Coordination geometries of selected transition metal ions (Co2+, Ni2+, Cu2+, Zn2+, Cd2+, and Hg2+) in metalloproteins. J. Inorg. Biochem 71, 115–27 10.1016/s0162-0134(98)10042-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Couñago RM, Ween MP, Begg SL, Bajaj M, Zuegg J, O'Mara ML, et al. (2014) Imperfect coordination chemistry facilitates metal ion release in the Psa permease. Nature Chem. Biol 10, 35–41 10.1038/nchembio.1382 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Foster AW, Osman D, Robinson NJ (2014) Metal Preferences and Metallation. J. Biol. Chem 289, 28095–103 10.1074/jbc.r114.588145 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Klein JS, Lewinson O (2011) Bacterial ATP-driven transporters of transition metals: physiological roles, mechanisms of action, and roles in bacterial virulence. Metallomics. 3 10.1039/c1mt00073j [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Bozzi AT, Gaudet R (2021) Molecular Mechanism of Nramp-Family Transition Metal Transport. J. Mol. Biol 433, 166991. 10.1016/j.jmb.2021.166991 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Hohle Thomas H, Franck William L, Stacey G, O'Brian Mark R (2011) Bacterial outer membrane channel for divalent metal ion acquisition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 108, 15390–5. 10.1073/pnas.1110137108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Raimunda D, Elso-Berberián G (2014) Functional characterization of the CDF transporter SMc02724 (SmYiiP) in Sinorhizobium meliloti: Roles in manganese homeostasis and nodulation. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Biomembr 1838, 3203–11 10.1016/j.bbamem.2014.09.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Ouyang A, Gasner Kendall M, Neville Stephanie L, McDevitt Christopher A, Frawley Elaine R (2022) MntP and YiiP Contribute to Manganese Efflux in Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium under Conditions of Manganese Overload and Nitrosative Stress. Microbiol. Spectr 10, e01316–21. 10.1128/spectrum.01316-21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Paruthiyil S, Pinochet-Barros A, Huang X, Helmann JD (2020) Bacillus subtilis TerC Family Proteins Help Prevent Manganese Intoxication. J. Bacteriol 202 10.1128/jb.00624-19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Wu Q, Mu Q, Xia Z, Min J, Wang F (2021) Manganese homeostasis at the host-pathogen interface and in the host immune system. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol 115, 45–53 10.1016/j.semcdb.2020.12.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Ha N, Lee EJ (2023) Manganese Transporter Proteins in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. J. Microbiol 61, 289–296 10.1007/s12275-023-00027-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Taniguchi R, Kato HE, Font J, Deshpande CN, Wada M, Ito K, et al. (2015) Outward- and inward-facing structures of a putative bacterial transition-metal transporter with homology to ferroportin. Nat. Commun 6, 8545 10.1038/ncomms9545 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Martin JE, Le MT, Bhattarai N, Capdevila DA, Shen J, Winkler ME, et al. (2019) A Mn-sensing riboswitch activates expression of a Mn2+/Ca2+ ATPase transporter in Streptococcus. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, 6885–99 10.1093/nar/gkz494 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Waters LS, Sandoval M, Storz G (2011) The Escherichia coli MntR miniregulon includes genes encoding a small protein and an efflux pump required for manganese homeostasis. J. Bacteriol 193, 5887–97. 10.1128/jb.05872-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Lubkowitz M (2006) The OPT family functions in long-distance peptide and metal transport in plants. Genet. Engg 27, 35–55 10.1007/0-387-25856-6_3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Milner MJ, Seamon J, Craft E, Kochian LV (2013) Transport properties of members of the ZIP family in plants and their role in Zn and Mn homeostasis. J. Exp. Bot 64, 369–81 10.1093/jxb/ers315 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Shigaki T, Pittman JK, Hirschi KD (2003) Manganese specificity determinants in the Arabidopsis metal/H+ antiporter CAX2. J. Biol. Chem 278, 6610–7 10.1074/jbc.m209952200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Hall JL, Williams LE (2003) Transition metal transporters in plants. J. Exp. Bot 54, 2601–13 10.1093/jxb/erg303 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Connorton JM, Jones ER, Rodríguez-Ramiro I, Fairweather-Tait S, Uauy C, Balk J (2017) Wheat Vacuolar Iron Transporter TaVIT2 Transports Fe and Mn and Is Effective for Biofortification. Plant Physiol. 174, 2434–44 10.1104/pp.17.00672 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Labarbuta P, Duckett K, Botting CH, Chahrour O, Malone J, Dalton JP, et al. (2017) Recombinant vacuolar iron transporter family homologue PfVIT from human malaria-causing Plasmodium falciparum is a Fe2+/H+ exchanger. Sci. Rep 7, 42850 10.1038/srep42850 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Kato T, Kumazaki K, Wada M, Taniguchi R, Nakane T, Yamashita K, et al. (2019) Crystal structure of plant vacuolar iron transporter VIT1. Nat. Plants 5, 308–15 10.1038/s41477-019-0367-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Thines L, Deschamps A, Stribny J, Morsomme P (2019) Yeast as a Tool for Deeper Understanding of Human Manganese-Related Diseases. Genes 10 10.3390/genes10070545 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Culotta Valeria C, Yang M, Hall Matthew D (2005) Manganese Transport and Trafficking: Lessons Learned from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Eukaryot. Cell 4, 1159–65 10.1128/EC.4.7.1159-1165.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Pittman JK (2005) Managing the manganese: molecular mechanisms of manganese transport and homeostasis. New Phytol. 167, 733–42 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01453.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Reddi AR, Jensen LT, Culotta VC (2009) Manganese homeostasis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Chem. Rev 109, 4722–32 10.1021/cr900031u [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Andreeva N, Kulakovskaya E, Zvonarev A, Penin A, Eliseeva I, Teterina A, et al. (2017) Transcriptome profile of yeast reveals the essential role of PMA2 and uncharacterized gene YBR056W-A (MNC1) in adaptation to toxic manganese concentration. Metallomics. 9, 175–82 10.1039/c6mt00210b [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Jensen LT, Ajua-Alemanji M, Culotta VC (2003) The Saccharomyces cerevisiae high affinity phosphate transporter encoded by PHO84 also functions in manganese homeostasis. J Biol Chem. 278, 42036–40 10.1074/jbc.m307413200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Lin SJ, Culotta VC (1996) Suppression of oxidative damage by Saccharomyces cerevisiae ATX2, which encodes a manganese-trafficking protein that localizes to Golgi-like vesicles. Mol. Cell. Biol 16, 6303–12 10.1128/mcb.16.11.6303 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.García-Rodríguez N, Manzano-López J, Muñoz-Bravo M, Fernández-García E, Muñiz M, Wellinger RE (2015) Manganese redistribution by calcium-stimulated vesicle trafficking bypasses the need for P-type ATPase function. J. Biol. Chem 290, 9335–47 10.1074/jbc.m114.616334 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Chesi A, Kilaru A, Fang X, Cooper AA, Gitler AD (2012) The role of the Parkinson's disease gene PARK9 in essential cellular pathways and the manganese homeostasis network in yeast. PLoS One. 7, e34178 10.1371/journal.pone.0034178 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Potelle S, Dulary E, Climer L, Duvet S, Morelle W, Vicogne D, et al. (2017) Manganese-induced turnover of TMEM165. Biochem. J 474, 1481–93 10.1042/bcj20160910 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Thines L, Deschamps A, Sengottaiyan P, Savel O, Stribny J, Morsomme P (2018) The yeast protein Gdt1p transports Mn2+ ions and thereby regulates manganese homeostasis in the Golgi. J. Biol. Chem 293, 8048–55 10.1074/jbc.RA118.002324 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Luk E, Carroll M, Baker M, Culotta VC (2003) Manganese activation of superoxide dismutase 2 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae requires MTM1, a member of the mitochondrial carrier family. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 100, 10353–7 10.1073/pnas.1632471100 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Lisher J, Giedroc D (2013) Manganese acquisition and homeostasis at the host-pathogen interface. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol 3 10.3389/fcimb.2013.00091 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Herrera C, Pettiglio MA, Bartnikas TB (2014) Investigating the role of transferrin in the distribution of iron, manganese, copper, and zinc. J. Biol. Inorg. Chem 19, 869–77 10.1007/s00775-014-1118-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Kawabata H (2019) Transferrin and transferrin receptors update. Free Radic. Biol. Med 133, 46–54 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2018.06.037 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Au C, Benedetto A, Aschner M (2008) Manganese transport in eukaryotes: the role of DMT1. Neurotoxicology 29, 569–76 10.1016/j.neuro.2008.04.022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Fujishiro H, Kambe T (2022) Manganese transport in mammals by zinc transporter family proteins, ZNT and ZIP. J. Pharmacol. Sci 148, 125–33 10.1016/j.jphs.2021.10.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Sigel A, Sigel H, Sigel RK (2014) Interrelations between essential metal ions and human diseases. Metal ions in life sciences. Transit. Met. Chem 39, 971–972 10.1007/978-94-007-7500-8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Fleming SM, Santiago NA, Mullin EJ, Pamphile S, Karkare S, Lemkuhl A, et al. (2018) The effect of manganese exposure in Atp13a2-deficient mice. NeuroToxicology. 64, 256–66 10.1016/j.neuro.2017.06.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Grice DM, Vetter I, Faddy HM, Kenny PA, Roberts-Thomson SJ, Monteith GR (2010) Golgi Calcium Pump Secretory Pathway Calcium ATPase 1 (SPCA1) Is a Key Regulator of Insulin-like Growth Factor Receptor (IGF1R) Processing in the Basal-like Breast Cancer Cell Line MDA-MB-231. J. Biol. Chem 285, 37458–66 10.1074/jbc.m110.163329 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Takeda A (2003) Manganese action in brain function. Brain Res. Rev 41, 79–87. 10.1016/S0165-0173(02)00234-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Christenson ET, Gallegos AS, Banerjee A (2018) In vitro reconstitution, functional dissection, and mutational analysis of metal ion transport by mitoferrin-1. J. Biol. Chem 293, 3819–28 10.1074/jbc.m117.817478 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Horning KJ, Caito SW, Tipps KG, Bowman AB, Aschner M (2015) Manganese Is Essential for Neuronal Health. Annu. Rev. Nutr 35, 71–108 10.1146/annurev-nutr-071714-034419 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Lawrence MC, Pilling PA, Epa VC, Berry AM, Ogunniyi AD, Paton JC (1998) The crystal structure of pneumococcal surface antigen PsaA reveals a metal-binding site and a novel structure for a putative ABC-type binding protein. Structure 6, 1553–61 10.1016/S0969-2126(98)00153-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Abate F, Malito E, Cozzi R, Lo Surdo P, Maione D, Bottomley MJ (2014) Apo, Zn2+-bound and Mn2+-bound structures reveal ligand-binding properties of SitA from the pathogen Staphylococcus pseudintermedius. Biosci. Rep 34, e00154 10.1042/BSR20140088 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Bozzi AT, Zimanyi CM, Nicoludis JM, Lee BK, Zhang CH, Gaudet R (2019) Structures in multiple conformations reveal distinct transition metal and proton pathways in an Nramp transporter. Elife 8, e41124 10.7554/eLife.41124 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Pan Y, Ren Z, Gao S, Shen J, Wang L, Xu Z, et al. (2020) Structural basis of ion transport and inhibition in ferroportin. Nat. Commun 11, 5686 10.1038/s41467-020-19458-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Harding M. (2000) The geometry of metal-ligand interactions relevant to proteins. II. Angles at the metal atom, additional weak metal-donor interactions. Acta Crystallogr. D. Biol. Crystallogr 56, 857–67. 10.1107/s0907444900005849 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Harding M. (2001) Geometry of metal-ligand interactions in proteins. Acta Crystallogr. D. Biol. Crystallogr 57, 401–11 10.1107/s0907444900019168 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Harding M (2006) Small revisions to predicted distances around metal sites in proteins. Acta Crystallogr. D. Biol. Crystallogr 62, 678–82 10.1107/s0907444906014594 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Ray S, Berry SP, Wilson EA, Zhang CH, Shekhar M, Singharoy A, et al. (2023) High-resolution structures with bound Mn2+ and Cd2+ map the metal import pathway in an Nramp transporter. eLife. 12, e84006 10.7554/eLife.84006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Golynskiy MV, Gunderson WA, Hendrich MP, Cohen SM (2006) Metal Binding Studies and EPR Spectroscopy of the Manganese Transport Regulator MntR. Biochemistry 45, 15359–72 10.1021/bi0607406 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Kliegman JI, Griner SL, Helmann JD, Brennan RG, Glasfeld A (2006) Structural basis for the metal-selective activation of the manganese transport regulator of Bacillus subtilis. Biochemistry 45, 3493–505 10.1021/bi0524215 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Glasfeld A, Guedon E, Helmann JD, Brennan RG (2003) Structure of the manganese-bound manganese transport regulator of Bacillus subtilis. Nat. Struct. Biol 10, 652–7 10.1038/nsb951 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Zheng H, Chruszcz M, Lasota P, Lebioda L, Minor W (2008) Data mining of metal ion environments present in protein structures. J. Inorg. Biochem 102, 1765–76 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2008.05.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Neville SL, Sjöhamn J, Watts JA, MacDermott-Opeskin H, Fairweather SJ, Ganio K, et al. (2021) The structural basis of bacterial manganese import. Sci. Adv 7. 10.1126/sciadv.abg3980 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.McDevitt CA, Ogunniyi AD, Valkov E, Lawrence MC, Kobe B, McEwan AG, et al. (2011) A Molecular Mechanism for Bacterial Susceptibility to Zinc. PLOS Pathog. 7, e1002357 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002357 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Jacobsen FE, Kazmierczak KM, Lisher JP, Winkler ME, Giedroc DP (2011) Interplay between manganese and zinc homeostasis in the human pathogen Streptococcus pneumoniae. Metallomics. 3, 38–41 10.1039/c0mt00050g [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Rukhman V, Anati R, Melamed-Frank M, Adir N (2005) The MntC Crystal Structure Suggests that Import of Mn2+ in Cyanobacteria is Redox Controlled. J. Mol. Biol 348, 961–9 10.1016/j.jmb.2005.03.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Chen J, Smaardijk S, Mattelaer C-A, Pamula F, Vandecaetsbeek I, Vanoevelen J, et al. (2019) An N-terminal Ca2+-binding motif regulates the secretory pathway Ca2+/Mn2+-transport ATPase SPCA1. J. Biol. Chem 294, 7878–91 10.1074/jbc.RA118.006250 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Chen Z, Watanabe S, Hashida H, Inoue M, Daigaku Y, Kikkawa M, et al. Cryo-EM structures of human SPCA1a reveal the mechanism of Ca2+/Mn2+ transport into the Golgi apparatus. Sci. Adv 9, eadd9742 10.1126/sciadv.add9742 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Xue J, Xie T, Zeng W, Jiang Y, Bai XC (2020) Cryo-EM structures of human ZnT8 in both outward- and inward-facing conformations. Elife. 9, e58823 10.7554/eLife.58823 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Zhang T, Liu J, Fellner M, Zhang C, Sui D, Hu J (2017) Crystal structures of a ZIP zinc transporter reveal a binuclear metal center in the transport pathway. Sci. Adv 3, e1700344 10.1126/sciadv.1700344 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Banci L, Bertini I. (2013) Metallomics and the cell: some definitions and general comments. Met. Ions Life Sci 12, 1–13 10.1007/978-94-007-5561-1_1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Hood MI, Skaar EP (2012) Nutritional immunity: transition metals at the pathogen–host interface. Nature Rev. Microbiol 10, 525–37 10.1038/nrmicro2836 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Klebba PE, Newton SMC, Six DA, Kumar A, Yang T, Nairn BL, et al. (2021) Iron Acquisition Systems of Gram-negative Bacterial Pathogens Define TonB-Dependent Pathways to Novel Antibiotics. Chem. Rev 121, 5193–239 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c01005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Garmory Helen S, Titball Richard W (2004) ATP-Binding Cassette Transporters Are Targets for the Development of Antibacterial Vaccines and Therapies. Infect. Immun 72, 6757–63 10.1128/IAI.72.12.6757-6763.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Marlovits TC, Haase W, Herrmann C, Aller SG, Unger VM (2002) The membrane protein FeoB contains an intramolecular G protein essential for Fe (II) uptake in bacteria. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 99, 16243–8 10.1073/pnas.242338299 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Hung KW, Chang YW, Eng ET, Chen JH, Chen YC, Sun YJ, et al. (2010) Structural fold, conservation and Fe(II) binding of the intracellular domain of prokaryote FeoB. J Struct. Biol 170, 501–12 10.1016/j.jsb.2010.01.017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Drakesmith H, Nemeth E, Ganz T (2015) Ironing out Ferroportin. Cell Metab. 22, 777–87 10.1016/j.cmet.2015.09.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Gammella E, Correnti M, Cairo G, Recalcati S (2021) Iron Availability in Tissue Microenvironment: The Key Role of Ferroportin. Int. J. Mol. Sci 22(6), 2986 10.3390/ijms22062986 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Grass G, Otto M, Fricke B, Haney CJ, Rensing C, Nies DH, et al. (2005) FieF (YiiP) from Escherichia coli mediates decreased cellular accumulation of iron and relieves iron stress. Arch. Microbiol 183, 9–18 10.1007/s00203-004-0739-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Cubillas C, Vinuesa P, Luisa Tabche M, Dávalos A, Vázquez A, Hernández-Lucas I, et al. (2014) The cation diffusion facilitator protein EmfA of Rhizobium etli belongs to a novel subfamily of Mn2+/Fe2+ transporters conserved in α-proteobacteria. Metallomics 6, 1808–15 10.1039/c4mt00135d [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Krämer U, Talke IN, Hanikenne M (2007) Transition metal transport. FEBS Lett. 581, 2263–72 10.1016/j.febslet.2007.04.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Agafonov O, Selstø CH, Thorsen K, Xu XM, Drengstig T, Ruoff P (2016) The organization of controller motifs leading to robust plant iron homeostasis. PloS one. 11, e0147120 10.1371/journal.pone.0147120 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Balk J, Lobréaux S (2005) Biogenesis of iron–sulfur proteins in plants. Trends Plant Sci. 10, 324–31 10.1016/j.tplants.2005.05.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Yamaguchi H, Nishizawa NK, Nakanishi H, Mori S (2002) IDI7, a new iron-regulated ABC transporter from barley roots, localizes to the tonoplast. J. Exp. Bot 53, 727–35 10.1093/jexbot/53.369.727 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Morrissey J, Baxter IR, Lee J, Li L, Lahner B, Grotz N, et al. (2009) The Ferroportin Metal Efflux Proteins Function in Iron and Cobalt Homeostasis in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 21, 3326–38 10.1105/tpc.109.069401 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Clemens S (2001) Molecular mechanisms of plant metal tolerance and homeostasis. Planta. 212, 475–86 10.1007/s004250000458 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Martínez-Pastor MT, Puig S (2020) Adaptation to iron deficiency in human pathogenic fungi. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell. Res 1867, 118797 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2020.118797 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Lesuisse E, Blaiseau P-L, Dancis A, Camadro J-M (2001) Siderophore uptake and use by the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiology. 147, 289–98 10.1099/00221287-147-2-289 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Kim Y, Lampert SM, Philpott CC (2005) A receptor domain controls the intracellular sorting of the ferrichrome transporter, ARN1. EMBO J. 24, 952–62 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600579 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Robinson JR, Isikhuemhen OS, Anike FN (2021) Fungal-Metal Interactions: A Review of Toxicity and Homeostasis. J. Fungi 7(3), 225 10.3390/jof7030225 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Mühlenhoff U, Stadler JA, Richhardt N, Seubert A, Eickhorst T, Schweyen RJ, et al. (2003) A specific role of the yeast mitochondrial carriers MRS3/4p in mitochondrial iron acquisition under iron-limiting conditions. J. Biol. Chem 278, 40612–20 10.1074/jbc.m307847200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Froschauer EM, Schweyen RJ, Wiesenberger G (2009) The yeast mitochondrial carrier proteins Mrs3p/Mrs4p mediate iron transport across the inner mitochondrial membrane. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Biomembr 1788, 1044–50 10.1016/j.bbamem.2009.03.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Yin M, Liu Y, Chen Y (2021) Iron metabolism: an emerging therapeutic target underlying the anti-cancer effect of quercetin. Free Radic. Res 55, 296–303 10.1080/10715762.2021.1898604 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Gao J, Zhou Q, Wu D, Chen L (2021) Mitochondrial iron metabolism and its role in diseases. Clin. Chim. Acta 513, 6–12 10.1016/j.cca.2020.12.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Tsushima RG, Wickenden AD, Bouchard RA, Oudit GY, Liu PP, Backx PH (1999) Modulation of Iron Uptake in Heart by L-Type Ca2+ Channel Modifiers. Circ. Res 84, 1302–9. 10.1161/01.res.84.11.1302 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Garrick MD (2011) Human iron transporters. Genes Nutr. 6, 45–54 10.1007/s12263-010-0184-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Pantopoulos K, Porwal SK, Tartakoff A, Devireddy L (2012) Mechanisms of mammalian iron homeostasis. Biochemistry. 51, 5705–24 10.1021/bi300752r [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Banerjee S, Datta R (2020) Leishmania infection triggers hepcidin-mediated proteasomal degradation of Nramp1 to increase phagolysosomal iron availability. Cell. Microbiol 22, e13253 10.1111/cmi.13253 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Tong Y, Guo M (2009) Bacterial heme-transport proteins and their heme-coordination modes. Arch. Biochem. Biophys 481, 1–15 10.1016/j.abb.2008.10.013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Schalk IJ, Mislin GLA, Brillet K (2012) Structure, function and binding selectivity and stereoselectivity of siderophore–iron outer membrane transporters. Curr. Top. Membr 69, 37–66 10.1016/b978-0-12-394390-3.00002-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Peuckert F, Ramos-Vega AL, Miethke M, Schwörer CJ, Albrecht AG, Oberthür M, et al. (2011) The siderophore binding protein FeuA shows limited promiscuity toward exogenous triscatecholates. Chem. Biol 18, 907–19 10.1016/j.chembiol.2011.05.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Li N, Zhang C, Li B, Liu X, Huang Y, Xu S, et al. (2012) Unique Iron Coordination in Iron-chelating Molecule Vibriobactin Helps Vibrio cholerae Evade Mammalian Siderocalin-mediated Immune Response. J. Biol. Chem 287, 8912–9 10.1074/jbc.M111.316034 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Grigg JC, Vermeiren CL, Heinrichs DE, Murphy MEP (2007) Heme Coordination by Staphylococcus aureus IsdE. J. Biol. Chem 282, 28815–22 10.1074/jbc.M704602200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Ho WW, Li H, Eakanunkul S, Tong Y, Wilks A, Guo M, et al. (2007) Holo- and apo-bound structures of bacterial periplasmic heme-binding proteins. J. Biol. Chem 282, 35796–802 10.1074/jbc.m706761200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Wilde EJ, Hughes A, Blagova EV, Moroz OV, Thomas RP, Turkenburg JP, et al. (2017) Interactions of the periplasmic binding protein CeuE with Fe(III) n-LICAM4–siderophore analogues of varied linker length. Sci. Rep 7, 45941 10.1038/srep45941 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Aisen P, Leibman A, Zweier J (1978) Stoichiometric and site characteristics of the binding of iron to human transferrin. J. Biol. Chem 253, 1930–7 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)62337-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Calmettes C, Alcantara J, Yu RH, Schryvers AB, Moraes TF (2012) The structural basis of transferrin sequestration by transferrin-binding protein B. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol 19, 358–60 10.1038/nsmb.2251 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Delepelaire P (2019) Bacterial ABC transporters of iron containing compounds. Res. Microbiol 170, 345–57 10.1016/j.resmic.2019.10.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Radka CD, DeLucas LJ, Wilson LS, Lawrenz MB, Perry RD, Aller SG (2017) Crystal structure of Yersinia pestis virulence factor YfeA reveals two polyspecific metal-binding sites. Acta Crystallogr. D Struct. Biol 73, 557–72 10.1107/s2059798317006349 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Sun X, Baker HM, Ge R, Sun H, He Q-Y, Baker EN (2009) Crystal Structure and Metal Binding Properties of the Lipoprotein MtsA, Responsible for Iron Transport in Streptococcus pyogenes. Biochemistry 48, 6184–90 10.1021/bi900552c [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Desrosiers Daniel C, Bearden Scott W, Mier I, Abney J, Paulley James T, Fetherston Jacqueline D, et al. (2010) Znu Is the Predominant Zinc Importer in Yersinia pestis during In Vitro Growth but Is Not Essential for Virulence. Infect. Immun 78, 5163–77 10.1128/IAI.00732-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Billesbølle CB, Azumaya CM, Kretsch RC, Powers AS, Gonen S, Schneider S, et al. (2020) Structure of hepcidin-bound ferroportin reveals iron homeostatic mechanisms. Nature. 586, 807–11 10.1038/s41586-020-2668-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Nevo Y, Nelson N (2006) The NRAMP family of metal-ion transporters. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell. Res 1763, 609–20 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2006.05.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Yang Z, Yang F, Liu JL, Wu HT, Yang H, Shi Y, et al. (2022) Heavy metal transporters: Functional mechanisms, regulation, and application in phytoremediation. Sci. Total Environ 809, 151099 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151099 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Ullah I, Wang Y, Eide DJ, Dunwell JM (2018) Evolution, and functional analysis of Natural Resistance-Associated Macrophage Proteins (NRAMPs) from Theobroma cacao and their role in cadmium accumulation. Sci. Rep 8, 14412 10.1038/s41598-018-32819-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.McCabe SM, Zhao N (2021) The Potential Roles of Blood-Brain Barrier and Blood-Cerebrospinal Fluid Barrier in Maintaining Brain Manganese Homeostasis. Nutrients 13(6), 1833 10.3390/nu13061833 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Boyer E, Bergevin I, Malo D, Gros P, Cellier MFM (2002) Acquisition of Mn(II) in Addition to Fe(II) Is Required for Full Virulence of Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium. Infect. Immun 70, 6032–42 10.1128/iai.70.11.6032-6042.2002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Janulczyk R, Ricci S, Björck L (2003) MtsABC is important for manganese and iron transport, oxidative stress resistance, and virulence of Streptococcus pyogenes. Infect. Immun 71, 2656–64 10.1128/IAI.71.5.2656-2664.2003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Paik S, Brown A, Munro CL, Cornelissen CN, Kitten T (2003) The sloABCR operon of Streptococcus mutans encodes an Mn and Fe transport system required for endocarditis virulence and its Mn-dependent repressor. J. Bacteriol 185, 5967–75 10.1128/jb.185.20.5967-5975.2003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Begg SL, Eijkelkamp BA, Luo Z, Couñago RM, Morey JR, Maher MJ, et al. (2015) Dysregulation of transition metal ion homeostasis is the molecular basis for cadmium toxicity in Streptococcus pneumoniae. Nature Commun. 6, 6418 10.1038/ncomms7418 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Singh KV, Coque TM, Weinstock GM, Murray BE (1998) In vivo testing of an Enterococcus faecalis efaA mutant and use of efaA homologs for species identification. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol 21, 323–31 10.1111/j.1574-695x.1998.tb01180.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Gat O, Mendelson I, Chitlaru T, Ariel N, Altboum Z, Levy H, et al. (2005) The solute-binding component of a putative Mn(II) ABC transporter (MntA) is a novel Bacillus anthracis virulence determinant. Mol. Microbiol 58, 533–51 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04848.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Gribenko A, Mosyak L, Ghosh S, Parris K, Svenson K, Moran J, et al. (2013) Three-dimensional structure and biophysical characterization of Staphylococcus aureus cell surface antigen-manganese transporter MntC. J. Mol. Biol 425, 3429–45 10.1016/j.jmb.2013.06.033 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Sun H, Xu G, Zhan H, Chen H, Sun Z, Tian B, et al. (2010) Identification and evaluation of the role of the manganese efflux protein in Deinococcus radiodurans. BMC Microbiol. 10, 319 10.1186/1471-2180-10-319 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Zeinert R, Martinez E, Schmitz J, Senn K, Usman B, Anantharaman V, et al. (2018) Structure-function analysis of manganese exporter proteins across bacteria. J. Biol. Chem 293, 5715–30 10.1074/jbc.M117.790717 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Allen GS, Wu CC, Cardozo T, Stokes DL (2011) The architecture of CopA from Archeaoglobus fulgidus studied by cryo-electron microscopy and computational docking. Structure 19, 1219–32 10.1016/j.str.2011.05.014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Cohen Y, Megyeri M, Chen OCW, Condomitti G, Riezman I, Loizides-Mangold U, et al. (2013) The yeast p5 type ATPase, spf1, regulates manganese transport into the endoplasmic reticulum. PloS one 8, e85519 10.1371/journal.pone.0085519 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Tomita A, Daiho T, Kusakizako T, Yamashita K, Ogasawara S, Murata T, et al. (2021) Cryo-EM reveals mechanistic insights into lipid-facilitated polyamine export by human ATP13A2. Mol. Cell 81, 4799–809.e5 10.1016/j.molcel.2021.11.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Garcia AWA, Kinskovski UP, Diehl C, Reuwsaat JCV, Motta de Souza H, Pinto HB, et al. (2020) Participation of Zip3, a ZIP domain-containing protein, in stress response and virulence in Cryptococcus gattii. Fungal Genet. Biol 144, 103438 10.1016/j.fgb.2020.103438 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Sorribes-Dauden R, Peris D, Martínez-Pastor MT, Puig S (2020) Structure and function of the vacuolar Ccc1/VIT1 family of iron transporters and its regulation in fungi. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J 18, 3712–22 10.1016/j.csbj.2020.10.044 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Anderson GJ, Vulpe CD (2009) Mammalian iron transport. Cell. Mol. Life Sci 66, 3241 10.1007/s00018-009-0051-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Huang Y, Lemieux MJ, Song J, Auer M, Wang DN (2003) Structure and mechanism of the glycerol-3-phosphate transporter from Escherichia coli. Science 301, 616–20. 10.1126/science.1087619 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Crossgrove JS, Allen DD, Bukaveckas BL, Rhineheimer SS, Yokel RA (2003) Manganese distribution across the blood-brain barrier. I. Evidence for carrier-mediated influx of managanese citrate as well as manganese and manganese transferrin. Neurotoxicology 24, 3–13 10.1016/s0161-813x(02)00089-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Erikson KM, Thompson K, Aschner J, Aschner M (2007) Manganese neurotoxicity: a focus on the neonate. Pharmacol. Ther 113, 369–77 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2006.09.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Sauer DB, Song J, Wang B, Hilton JK, Karpowich NK, Mindell JA, et al. (2021) Structure and inhibition mechanism of the human citrate transporter NaCT. Nature 591, 157–61 10.1038/s41586-021-03230-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Wu M, Tong S, Waltersperger S, Diederichs K, Wang M, Zheng L (2013) Crystal structure of Ca2+/H+ antiporter protein YfkE reveals the mechanisms of Ca2+ efflux and its pH regulation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 110, 11367–72 10.1073/pnas.1302515110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Crossgrove JS, Yokel RA (2005) Manganese distribution across the blood-brain barrier. IV. Evidence for brain influx through store-operated calcium channels. Neurotoxicology 26, 297–307 10.1016/j.neuro.2004.09.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Hohle TH, O'Brian MR (2014) Magnesium-dependent processes are targets of bacterial manganese toxicity. Mol. Microbiol 93, 736–47 10.1111/mmi.12687 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Daniel H, Spanier B, Kottra G, Weitz D (2006) From Bacteria to Man: Archaic Proton-Dependent Peptide Transporters at Work. Physiology 21, 93–102 10.1152/physiol.00054.2005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Trilisenko L, Zvonarev A, Valiakhmetov A, Penin AA, Eliseeva IA, Ostroumov V, et al. (2019) The Reduced Level of Inorganic Polyphosphate Mobilizes Antioxidant and Manganese-Resistance Systems in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cells 8(5), 461 10.3390/cells8050461 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Tuschl K, Mills PB, Clayton PT (2013) Manganese and the Brain. Int. Rev. Neurobiol 110, 277–312 10.1016/b978-0-12-410502-7.00013-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165.Karki P, Lee E, Aschner M (2013) Manganese Neurotoxicity: a Focus on Glutamate Transporters. Ann. Occup. Environ. Med 25, 4 10.1186/2052-4374-25-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166.Itoh K, Sakata M, Watanabe M, Aikawa Y, Fujii H (2008) The entry of manganese ions into the brain is accelerated by the activation of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors. Neuroscience 154, 732–40 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.03.080 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167.Lü W, Du J, Goehring A, Gouaux E (2017) Cryo-EM structures of the triheteromeric NMDA receptor and its allosteric modulation. Science 355 10.1126/science.aal3729 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168.Erikson K, Aschner M (2002) Manganese Causes Differential Regulation of Glutamate Transporter (GLAST) Taurine Transporter and Metallothionein in Cultured Rat Astrocytes. NeuroToxicology 23, 595–602 10.1016/S0161-813X(02)00012-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169.Lee E, Sidoryk-Wêgrzynowicz M, Wang N, Webb A, Son DS, Lee K, et al. (2012) GPR30 regulates glutamate transporter GLT-1 expression in rat primary astrocytes. J. Biol. Chem 287, 26817–28 10.1074/jbc.m112.341867 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170.Bowman AB, Kwakye GF, Herrero Hernández E, Aschner M (2011) Role of manganese in neurodegenerative diseases. J. Trace Elem. Med. Biol 25, 191–203 10.1016/j.jtemb.2011.08.144 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171.Goytain A, Hines RM, Quamme GA (2008) Huntingtin-interacting proteins, HIP14 and HIP14L, mediate dual functions, palmitoyl acyltransferase and Mg2+ transport. J. Biol. Chem 283, 33365–74 10.1074/jbc.m801469200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172.Anderson JG, Cooney PT, Erikson KM (2007) Inhibition of DAT function attenuates manganese accumulation in the globus pallidus. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol 23, 179–84 10.1016/j.etap.2006.08.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173.Levenson CW, Tassabehji NM (2004) Iron and ageing: an introduction to iron regulatory mechanisms. Ageing Res. Rev 3, 251–63 10.1016/j.arr.2004.03.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174.Puig S, AndrÉS-ColÁS N, GarcÍA-Molina A, PeÑArrubia L (2007) Copper and iron homeostasis in Arabidopsis: responses to metal deficiencies, interactions and biotechnological applications. Plant Cell Environ. 30, 271–90 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01642.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175.Montalbetti N, Simonin A, Kovacs G, Hediger MA (2013) Mammalian iron transporters: families SLC11 and SLC40. Mol. Aspects Med 34, 270–87 10.1016/j.mam.2013.01.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 176.Yanatori I, Kishi F (2019) DMT1 and iron transport. Free Radic. Biol. Med 133, 55–63 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2018.07.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 177.Fetherston JD, Bertolino VJ, Perry RD (1999) YbtP and YbtQ: two ABC transporters required for iron uptake in Yersinia pestis. Mol. Microbiol 32, 289–99 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1999.01348.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 178.Bearden SW, Perry RD (1999) The Yfe system of Yersinia pestis transports iron and manganese and is required for full virulence of plague. Mol. Microbiol 32, 403–14 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1999.01360.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 179.Brem D, Pelludat C, Rakin A, Jacobi CA, Heesemann J (2001) Functional analysis of yersiniabactin transport genes of Yersinia enterocolitica. Microbiology 147, 1115–27 10.1099/00221287-147-5-1115 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 180.Pattery T, Hernalsteens JP, De Greve H (1999) Identification and molecular characterization of a novel Salmonella enteritidis pathogenicity islet encoding an ABC transporter. Mol. Microbiol 33, 791–805 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1999.01526.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 181.Clarke TE, Braun V, Winkelmann G, Tari LW, Vogel HJ (2002) X-ray crystallographic structures of the Escherichia coli periplasmic protein FhuD bound to hydroxamate-type siderophores and the antibiotic albomycin. J. Biol. Chem 277, 13966–72 10.1074/jbc.m109385200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 182.Tom-Yew SAL, Cui DT, Bekker EG, Murphy MEP (2005) Anion-independent Iron Coordination by the Campylobacter jejuni Ferric Binding Protein. J. Biol. Chem 280, 9283–90. 10.1074/jbc.M412479200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 183.Brown JS, Gilliland SM, Holden DW (2001) A Streptococcus pneumoniae pathogenicity island encoding an ABC transporter involved in iron uptake and virulence. Mol. Microbiol 40, 572–85 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2001.02414.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 184.Chhabra R, Saha A, Chamani A, Schneider N, Shah R, Nanjundan M (2020) Iron Pathways and Iron Chelation Approaches in Viral, Microbial, and Fungal Infections. Pharmaceuticals 13(10), 275 10.3390/ph13100275 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 185.Rodriguez GM, Smith I (2006) Identification of an ABC transporter required for iron acquisition and virulence in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J. Bacteriol 188, 424–30 10.1128/jb.188.2.424-430.2006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 186.Zhang B, Rao Z, Yang H, Sun S, Gao Y, Yang X, et al. (2022) Structural insights as to how iron-loaded siderophores are imported into Mycobacterium tuberculosis by IrtAB. bioRxiv 10.1101/2022.01.11.475891 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 187.Cheng W, Li Q, Jiang YL, Zhou CZ, Chen Y (2013) Structures of Streptococcus pneumoniae PiaA and its complex with ferrichrome reveal insights into the substrate binding and release of high affinity iron transporters. PLoS One. 8, e71451 10.1371/journal.pone.0071451 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 188.Zuo J, Wu Z, Li Y, Shen Z, Feng X, Zhang M, et al. (2017) Mitochondrial ABC Transporter ATM3 Is Essential for Cytosolic Iron-Sulfur Cluster Assembly. Plant Physiol. 173, 2096–109 10.1104/pp.16.01760 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 189.Lee JY, Yang JG, Zhitnitsky D, Lewinson O, Rees DC (2014) Structural basis for heavy metal detoxification by an Atm1-type ABC exporter. Science 343, 1133–6 10.1126/science.1246489 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 190.Balk J, Pilon M (2011) Ancient and essential: the assembly of iron–sulfur clusters in plants. Trends Plant Sci. 16, 218–26 10.1016/j.tplants.2010.12.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 191.Kushnir S, Babiychuk E, Storozhenko S, Davey MW, Papenbrock J, De Rycke R, et al. (2001) A Mutation of the Mitochondrial ABC Transporter Sta1 Leads to Dwarfism and Chlorosis in the Arabidopsis Mutant starik. Plant Cell 13, 89–100 10.1105/tpc.13.1.89 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 192.Mourer T, Normant V, Labbé S (2017) Heme Assimilation in Schizosaccharomyces pombe Requires Cell-surface-anchored Protein Shu1 and Vacuolar Transporter Abc3. J. Biol. Chem 292, 4898–912 10.1074/jbc.m117.776807 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 193.Pouliot B, Jbel M, Mercier A, Labbé S (2010) abc3+ encodes an iron-regulated vacuolar ABC-type transporter in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Eukaryot. Cell 9, 59–73 10.1128/EC.00262-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 194.Pain D, Dancis A (2016) Roles of Fe–S proteins: from cofactor synthesis to iron homeostasis to protein synthesis. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev 38, 45–51 10.1016/j.gde.2016.03.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 195.Yan Q, Shen Y, Yang X (2022) Cryo-EM structure of AMP-PNP-bound human mitochondrial ATP-binding cassette transporter ABCB7. J. Struct. Biol 214, 107832 10.1016/j.jsb.2022.107832 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 196.Jonker Johan W, Buitelaar M, Wagenaar E, van der Valk Martin A, Scheffer George L, Scheper Rik J, et al. (2002) The breast cancer resistance protein protects against a major chlorophyll-derived dietary phototoxin and protoporphyria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 99, 15649–54 10.1073/pnas.202607599 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 197.Orlando BJ, Liao M (2020) ABCG2 transports anticancer drugs via a closed-to-open switch. Nat. Commun 11, 2264 10.1038/s41467-020-16155-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 198.Zhang Y, Xu Y-H, Yi H-Y, Gong J-M (2012) Vacuolar membrane transporters OsVIT1 and OsVIT2 modulate iron translocation between flag leaves and seeds in rice. Plant J. 72, 400–10 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2012.05088.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 199.Erpapazoglou Z, Froissard M, Nondier I, Lesuisse E, Haguenauer-Tsapis R, Belgareh-Touzé N (2008) Substrate- and Ubiquitin-Dependent Trafficking of the Yeast Siderophore Transporter Sit1. Traffic 9, 1372–91 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2008.00766.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 200.Khan AA, Quigley JG (2013) Heme and FLVCR-related transporter families SLC48 and SLC49. Mol. Aspects Med 34, 669–82 10.1016/j.mam.2012.07.013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 201.Nemeth E, Ganz T (2021) Hepcidin-Ferroportin Interaction Controls Systemic Iron Homeostasis. Int. J. Mol. Sci 22(12), 6493 10.3390/ijms22126493 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 202.Le Blanc S, Garrick MD, Arredondo M (2012) Heme carrier protein 1 transports heme and is involved in heme-Fe metabolism. Am. J. Physiol. Cell. Physiol 302, C1780–5 10.1152/ajpcell.00080.2012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 203.Parker JL, Deme JC, Kuteyi G, Wu Z, Huo J, Goldman ID, et al. (2021) Structural basis of antifolate recognition and transport by PCFT. Nature 595, 130–4 10.1038/s41586-021-03579-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 204.Knutson MD (2019) Non-transferrin-bound iron transporters. Free Radic. Biol. Med 133, 101–11 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2018.10.413 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 205.Wu J, Yan Z, Li Z, Yan C, Lu S, Dong M, et al. (2015) Structure of the voltage-gated calcium channel Cav1.1 complex. Science 350, aad2395 10.1126/science.aad2395 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 206.Curie C, Cassin G, Couch D, Divol F, Higuchi K, Le Jean M, et al. (2009) Metal movement within the plant: contribution of nicotianamine and yellow stripe 1-like transporters. Ann. Bot 103, 1–11 10.1093/aob/mcn207 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 207.Kosman DJ (2003) Molecular mechanisms of iron uptake in fungi. Mol. Microbiol 47, 1185–97 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03368.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 208.White C, Yuan X, Schmidt PJ, Bresciani E, Samuel TK, Campagna D, et al. (2013) HRG1 is essential for heme transport from the phagolysosome of macrophages during erythrophagocytosis. Cell Metab. 17, 261–70 10.1016/j.cmet.2013.01.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 209.Kumar H, Finer-Moore JS, Jiang X, Smirnova I, Kasho V, Pardon E, et al. (2018) Crystal Structure of a ligand-bound LacY-Nanobody Complex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 115, 8769–74 10.1073/pnas.1801774115 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 210.Caza M, Kronstad J (2013) Shared and distinct mechanisms of iron acquisition by bacterial and fungal pathogens of humans. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol 3, 80 10.3389/fcimb.2013.00080 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 211.Neumann W, Hadley RC, Nolan EM (2017) Transition metals at the host–pathogen interface: how Neisseria exploit human metalloproteins for acquiring iron and zinc. Essays Biochem. 61, 211–23 10.1042/EBC20160084 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 212.Eckenroth BE, Steere AN, Chasteen ND, Everse SJ, Mason AB (2011) How the binding of human transferrin primes the transferrin receptor potentiating iron release at endosomal pH. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 108, 13089–94 10.1073/pnas.1105786108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 213.Kell DB, Heyden EL, Pretorius E (2020) The Biology of Lactoferrin, an Iron-Binding Protein That Can Help Defend Against Viruses and Bacteria. Front. Immun 11, 1221 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01221 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 214.Suzuki YA, Lopez V, Lönnerdal B (2005) Mammalian lactoferrin receptors: structure and function. Cell. Mol. Life Sci 62, 2560–75 10.1007/s00018-005-5371-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 215.Jiang R, Lopez V, Kelleher SL, Lönnerdal B (2011) Apo- and holo-lactoferrin are both internalized by lactoferrin receptor via clathrin-mediated endocytosis but differentially affect ERK-signaling and cell proliferation in caco-2 cells. J. Cell. Physiol 226, 3022–31 10.1002/jcp.22650 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 216.Pilpa RM, Robson SA, Villareal VA, Wong ML, Phillips M, Clubb RT (2009) Functionally distinct NEAT (NEAr Transporter) domains within the Staphylococcus aureus IsdH/HarA protein extract heme from methemoglobin. J. Biol. Chem 284, 1166–76 10.1074/jbc.M806007200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 217.Muraki N, Aono S (2015) Structural Basis for Heme Recognition by HmuT Responsible for Heme Transport to the Heme Transporter in Corynebacterium glutamicum. Chem. Lett 45, 24–6 10.1246/cl.150894 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 218.Henderson DP, Payne SM (1994) Characterization of the Vibrio cholerae outer membrane heme transport protein HutA: sequence of the gene, regulation of expression, and homology to the family of TonB-dependent proteins. J. Bacteriol 176, 3269–77 10.1128/jb.176.11.3269-3277.1994 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 219.Mey AR, Payne SM (2001) Haem utilization in Vibrio cholerae involves multiple TonB-dependent haem receptors. Mol. Microbiol 42, 835–49 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2001.02683.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 220.Cobessi D, Meksem A, Brillet K (2010) Structure of the heme/hemoglobin outer membrane receptor ShuA from Shigella dysenteriae: Heme binding by an induced fit mechanism. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Bioinform 78, 286–94 10.1002/prot.22539 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 221.Krieg S, Huché F, Diederichs K, Izadi-Pruneyre N, Lecroisey A, Wandersman C, et al. (2009) Heme uptake across the outer membrane as revealed by crystal structures of the receptor–hemophore complex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 106, 1045–50 10.1073/pnas.0809406106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 222.Mourer T, Jacques JF, Brault A, Bisaillon M, Labbé S (2015) Shu1 is a cell-surface protein involved in iron acquisition from heme in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. J. Biol. Chem 290, 10176–90 10.1074/jbc.m115.642058 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 223.Anderson GJ, Frazer DM (2017) Current understanding of iron homeostasis. Am. J. Clin. Nutr 106, 1559S–66S 10.3945/ajcn.117.155804 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 224.Nielsen MJ, Møller HJ, Moestrup SK (2010) Hemoglobin and heme scavenger receptors. Antioxid. Redox Signal 12, 261–73 10.1089/ars.2009.2792 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 225.Van Gorp H, Delputte PL, Nauwynck HJ (2010) Scavenger receptor CD163, a Jack-of-all-trades and potential target for cell-directed therapy. Mol. Immunol 47, 1650–60 10.1016/j.molimm.2010.02.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 226.Ma H, Li R, Jiang L, Qiao S, Chen XX, Wang A, et al. (2021) Structural comparison of CD163 SRCR5 from different species sheds some light on its involvement in porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus-2 infection in vitro. Vet. Res 52, 97 10.1186/s13567-021-00969-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 227.Devireddy LR, Hart DO, Goetz DH, Green MR (2010) A Mammalian Siderophore Synthesized by an Enzyme with a Bacterial Homolog Involved in Enterobactin Production. Cell 141, 1006–17 10.1016/j.cell.2010.04.040 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 228.Khan A, Singh P, Srivastava A (2018) Synthesis, nature and utility of universal iron chelator – Siderophore: A review. Microbiol. Res 212-213, 103–11 10.1016/j.micres.2017.10.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 229.Roskova Z, Skarohlid R, McGachy L (2022) Siderophores: an alternative bioremediation strategy? Sci. Total Environ 819, 153144 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153144 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 230.Moynié L, Milenkovic S, Mislin GLA, Gasser V, Malloci G, Baco E, et al. (2019) The complex of ferric-enterobactin with its transporter from Pseudomonas aeruginosa suggests a two-site model. Nat. Commun 10, 3673 10.1038/s41467-019-11508-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 231.Yang J, Goetz D, Li JY, Wang W, Mori K, Setlik D, et al. (2002) An iron delivery pathway mediated by a lipocalin. Mol. Cell 10, 1045–56 10.1016/s1097-2765(02)00710-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 232.Yang J, Mori K, Li JY, Barasch J (2003) Iron, lipocalin, and kidney epithelia. Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol 285, F9–18 10.1152/ajprenal.00008.2003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 233.Yu B, Cheng C, Wu Y, Guo L, Kong D, Zhang Z, et al. (2020) Interactions of ferritin with scavenger receptor class A members. J. Biol. Chem 295, 15727–41 10.1074/jbc.ra120.014690 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 234.Santiago C, Ballesteros A, Tami C, Martínez-Muñoz L, Kaplan GG, Casasnovas JM (2007) Structures of T Cell immunoglobulin mucin receptors 1 and 2 reveal mechanisms for regulation of immune responses by the TIM receptor family. Immunity 26, 299–310 10.1016/j.immuni.2007.01.014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 235.Rolfs A, Hediger MA (1999) Metal ion transporters in mammals: structure, function and pathological implications. J. Physiol 518, 1–12 10.1111/j.1469-7793.1999.0001r.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 236.Yu J, Wessling-Resnick M (1998) Structural and Functional Analysis of SFT, a Stimulator of Fe Transport. J. Biol. Chem 273, 21380–5. 10.1074/jbc.273.33.21380 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 237.Andrews SC, Robinson AK, Rodríguez-Quiñones F (2003) Bacterial iron homeostasis. FEMS Microbiol. Rev 27, 215–37 10.1016/s0168-6445(03)00055-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 238.Stevenson B, Wyckoff EE, Payne SM (2016) Vibrio cholerae FeoA, FeoB, and FeoC interact to form a complex. J. Bacteriol 198, 1160–70 10.1128/JB.00930-15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 239.Ash MR, Maher MJ, Guss JM, Jormakka M (2011) The initiation of GTP hydrolysis by the G-domain of FeoB: insights from a transition-state complex structure. PLoS One. 6, e23355 10.1371/journal.pone.0023355 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 240.Schalk IJ, Yue WW, Buchanan SK (2004) Recognition of iron-free siderophores by TonB-dependent iron transporters. Mol. Microbiol 54, 14–22 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04241.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 241.Shaw GC, Cope JJ, Li L, Corson K, Hersey C, Ackermann GE, et al. (2006) Mitoferrin is essential for erythroid iron assimilation. Nature 440, 96–100 10.1038/nature04512 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 242.Ruprecht JJ, Kunji ERS (2020) The SLC25 Mitochondrial Carrier Family: Structure and Mechanism. Trends Biochem. Sc 45, 244–58 10.1016/j.tibs.2019.11.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 243.Pebay-Peyroula E, Dahout-Gonzalez C, Kahn R, Trézéguet V, Lauquin GJ, Brandolin G (2003) Structure of mitochondrial ADP/ATP carrier in complex with carboxyatractyloside. Nature 426, 39–44 10.1038/nature02056 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 244.Schmiege P, Fine M, Blobel G, Li X (2017) Human TRPML1 channel structures in open and closed conformations. Nature. 550, 366–70 10.1038/nature24036 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 245.Dong X-P, Cheng X, Mills E, Delling M, Wang F, Kurz T, et al. (2008) The type IV mucolipidosis-associated protein TRPML1 is an endolysosomal iron release channel. Nature 455, 992–6 10.1038/nature07311 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 246.Carrano CJ, Raymond KN (1979) Ferric ion sequestering agents. 2. Kinetics and mechanism of iron removal from transferrin by enterobactin and synthetic tricatechols. J. Am. Chem. Soc 101, 5401–4 10.1021/ja00512a047 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 247.Bozzi AT, Bane LB, Zimanyi CM, Gaudet R (2019) Unique structural features in an Nramp metal transporter impart substrate-specific proton cotransport and a kinetic bias to favor import. J. Gen. Physiol 151, 1413–29 10.1085/jgp.201912428 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 248.Jumper J, Evans R, Pritzel A, Green T, Figurnov M, Ronneberger O, et al. (2021) Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 596, 583–9 10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 249.Varadi M, Anyango S, Deshpande M, Nair S, Natassia C, Yordanova G, et al. (2022) AlphaFold Protein Structure Database: massively expanding the structural coverage of protein-sequence space with high-accuracy models. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, D439–D44 10.1093/nar/gkab1061 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 250.Taylor KM, Morgan HE, Smart K, Zahari NM, Pumford S, Ellis IO, et al. (2007) The emerging role of the LIV-1 subfamily of zinc transporters in breast cancer. Mol. Med 13, 396–406 10.2119/2007-00040.taylor [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES