Incidence and association of high-risk HPVs and EBV in patients with advanced stages of colorectal cancer from Qatar

ABSTRACT

High-risk Human Papillomaviruses (HPVs) and Epstein – Barr virus (EBV) are present and involved in several types of human carcinomas, including cervical and, head and neck cancers. Nevertheless, their presence and association in the pathogenesis of colorectal cancer is still nascent. The current study explored the association between the high-risk HPVs and EBV and tumor phenotype in colorectal cancers (CRCs) in the Qatari population. We found that high-risk HPVs and EBV are present in 69/100 and 21/100 cases, respectively. Additionally, 17% of the cases showed a copresence of high-risk HPVs and EBV, with a significant correlation only between the HPV45 subtype and EBV (p = .004). While the copresence did not significantly associate with clinicopathological characteristics, we identified that coinfection with more than two subtypes of HPV is a strong predictor of advanced stage CRC, and the confounding effect of the copresence of EBV in such cases strengthens this association. Our results indicate that high-risk HPVs and EBV can co-present in human CRCs in the Qatari population where they could plausibly play a specific role in human colorectal carcinogenesis. However, future studies are essential to confirm their copresence and synergistic role in developing CRCs.

Introduction

It is generally perceived that nearly 20% of all cancers are caused by infectious agents,¹ of which more than 12% are caused by viruses, or more specifically ‘‘oncoviruses.’’^2,3 The first human oncovirus, Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), was detected in Burkitt lymphoma cells by electron microscopy in 1964.⁴ Since then, our understanding of viral oncology has grown considerably.

Interestingly, viral cancers are reported to arise nearly 15 to 40 years after initial infection;¹ However, in most oncoviral cancers, viral replication is usually absent.^1,5 This is mainly due to the active replication resulting in host-cell lysis, thus preventing tumorogenesis.⁵ Therefore, the viral nucleic acids either exist as naked plasmids inside the host cell or integrate into the host genome.⁵ Oncogenic viruses may be DNA or RNA viruses; DNA oncoviruses include human papillomaviruses (HPVs), human herpesvirus-8 (HHV-8), hepatitis B virus (HBV), Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV) and EBV. In contrast, RNA oncoviruses include human T-cell lymphotropic virus-1 (HTLV-1) and hepatitis C virus (HCV).⁶ DNA oncoviruses’ genomes can integrate directly into the host genome. In contrast, RNA oncoviruses’ genomes must undergo reverse DNA transcription before integrating into the host genome.⁶

HPVs are small, double-stranded, non-enveloped DNA viruses.^7,8 HPV infections commonly start at the cutaneous or mucosal epithelium at the basal layer, often through lesions.⁹ In most cases, infection is asymptomatic and potentially disappears within a two years interval.¹⁰ Most HPV-associated cancers are caused by high-risk HPV (HR-HPV) types which include HPVs: 16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 55, 56, 58, 59, 68, 73, 82, and 83.¹¹ The HR-HPVs oncoproteins E6 and E7 are crucial for viral replication and the inhibition of cellular differentiation.^12,13 In addition, they bind and inactivate tumor suppressor proteins (p53 and pRb), consequently leading to the degradation of these proteins via the ubiquitination pathway resulting in the deregulation of the transcription factor E2F, thereby causing uncontrolled cellular proliferation.¹⁴

EBV belongs to a family of the herpes virus and is ubiquitous, as EBV infects almost 90% of the population.^14–16 EBV can exhibit dual tropism; where it can infect either epithelial cells and B-cells¹⁷ by switching its envelope proteins for specific entry mechanisms.¹⁸ While infecting B-cells, EBV engages its gp350 protein to bind to the complement receptor type 2 protein, which is found on the membrane surface of B cells. However, the virus can switch to the gp40 envelope protein for epithelial cell infection, using it to bind to surface integrins.¹⁹ EBV expresses specific viral oncoproteins that include the EBV-induced nuclear antigen 1/2 (EBNA1/2) and latent membrane proteins (LMP1, LMP2A, and LMP2B) that promote oncogenesis by facilitating genomic instabilities, inducing uncontrolled cell proliferation and blocking apoptosis via NF-κB, PI3K/Akt, MAPK and mTOR pathways.^20,21

Oncoviruses, including HR-HPVs and EBV, are involved in cancer etiology and play a vital role in cancer metastasis, especially in the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) process.²² Numerous studies have revealed the copresence of high-risk HPVs and EBV in various human malignancies, including cervical,²³ head and neck,^24,25 breast,^26,27 and gastric,²⁸ indicating their possible active role in cancer initiation and progression.

Recently, numerous reports worldwide have linked HPV and EBV as potential causative factors in colorectal cancer (CRC),^29–33 which is the third most common cancer and the second leading cause of cancer-related death globally.³⁴ However, only a few studies report the copresence of both EBV and HPV in colorectal cancer worldwide, including the Middle East region.^32,35–37 Hence, we herein explore the copresence of HR-HPVs and EBV in relation to tumor phenotype in CRCs in the Qatari population.

Materials and methods

Sample collection and DNA extraction

The study included 100 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue samples diagnosed during 2018–2021 at the Department of Pathology, Hamad Medical Corporation (HMC). For the study, all cases were de-identified, and patients’ information was anonymized. The study was conducted based on the IBC approval of Qatar University’s IBC committee #IBC-2019/005 dated 29 Feb 2019.

Prior to PCR, all cases were re-reviewed by a board-certified pathologist to confirm the diagnosis and select appropriate FFPE tissues for the assays. The tumor grade was defined according to the College of American Pathologists Consensus Statement,³⁸ while the tumor stage was defined as per the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM system (8th edition)³⁹

DNA was extracted from FFPE tissue samples (punch samples of 2 mm thickness) using the Thermo Scientific GeneJET FFPE DNA Purification Kit per the manufacturer’s instructions (ThermoFisher Scientific, USA). Briefly, enzymatic digestion of the FFPE sections was done using digestion buffer (200 µl) followed by lysing and release of genomic DNA using Proteinase K solution (20 µl). This was followed by heat incubation (90°C) for 40 min to de-crosslink the DNA. Then, the solution was centrifuged to obtain the supernatant containing DNA, to which binding buffer (200 µl) was added. Following binding, 96% ethanol, and lysate were added to the purification column and washed (wash Buffers 1 and 2) of adsorbed DNA to eradicate contaminants. Finally, DNA was eluted using the elution buffer (60 µl).

HPV and EBV detection by PCR

High-risk HPVs and EBV in purified genomic DNA were detected by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using specific primers for high-risk HPV types: 16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 45, 51, 52, and 59, as well as EBNA1, EBNA2, and LMP1 of EBV as previously described.^40,41 For internal control, GAPDH was used. All the analyses were completed as described Our group.⁴⁰ For every single experiment, we used the respective positive and negative controls reported by our group previously.⁴¹

PCR was carried out using the Invitrogen Platinum II Hot-Start Green PCR Master Mix (2×) (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Briefly, HPV and EBV virus genes were amplified for an initial denaturation (94°C for 2 min) followed by 40 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, annealing (temperatures ranging from 50°C to 62°C for 30 s) depending on each primer’s melting temperature as previously reported^40,41 and final extension (72°C for 10 min). The PCR product was resolved using 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis and visualized using iBrightCL1000 Imaging System (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The samples expressing any two oncoproteins of EBV (EBNA1, EBNA2, and LMP1) were considered to determine EBV positivity in our CRC cohort.

Statistical analysis

Chi-square (χ2) test with Yates’ correction and Fisher’s exact test were performed to determine the significant association between the presence/copresence of high-risk HPVs and EBV with the clinicopathological data (tumor grade, tumor stage, and lymph node involvement). Statistical significance was achieved if p-values were ≤ .05 in two-tailed tests.

Further, we used logistic regression to estimate the association of EBV, HPV, and its subtypes and the coinfection of HPV & EBV with sociodemographic and clinical correlates. HPV and EBV infection was coded as 1 and 0, indicating the presence and absence of infection. Next, subtypes of HPV were combined to create a binary variable HPV-coinfection indicating more than two subtypes (2 or more) as present and less as absent. Also, the presence of HPV and EBV was combined to create a binary variable coinfection indicating the presence of both infections by two or more subtypes of HPV and EBV as present and any one infection absent. Stage of Cancer was classified as an advanced binary variable (stages 3 and 4) and others (stages 1 and 2). Statistical analysis and plotting of graphs were done using the Stata software (version 17).

Results

Clinicopathological characteristics of the cohort

Table 1 summarizes the anatomical locations and clinicopathological characteristics of the CRC cohort.The study included samples from 66 male and 34 female patients. The mean age of patients was 57.1 years (standard deviation (SD), ±13.9 years), (age range = 23 to 96 years). All tumor samples were histologically confirmed as adenocarcinomas, of which 16% were metastatic cancers. Most of the samples (84%) were classified as grade 2 cancers. Moreover, 11%, 28%, 45%, and 16% of the cases were labeled as stages pT1, pT2, pT3, and pT4 tumors, respectively. Additionally, 58% of the cases were found to have metastasis in at least one or more local lymph nodes. Regarding the anatomical location of the cases, 23% of the specimens obtained were taken from the sigmoid colon, 17% from the rectosigmoid colon, 16% from the ascending colon, 14% from the descending colon, and 30% from other anatomic parts of the colon. Table 1 summarizes the anatomical locations and clinicopathological characteristics of the CRC cohort.

Table 1.

Clinicopathological characteristics of the CRC cohort.

Characteristic	Category	Overall Epidemographics	Coinfection HPV & EBV		p-value
			Absent (n = 83)	Present (n = 17)
Age in years (median)		60.0 (48.5, 67.0)ɫ	60.0 (49.0, 67.0)ɫ	55.0 (47.0, 64.0)ɫ	.48
Gender	Male	66 (66%)	52 (63%)	14 (82%)	.12
	Female	34 (34%)	31 (37%)	3 (18%)
Tumor Location	Ascending colon	16 (16%)	14 (17%)	2 (12%)	.091
	Descending colon	14 (14%)	13 (16%)	1 (6%)
	Transverse colon	5 (5%)	4 (5%)	1 (6%)
	Sigmoid colon	23 (23%)	18 (22%)	5 (29%)
	Rectosigmoid	17 (17%)	16 (19%)	1 (6%)
	Cecum	10 (10%)	9 (11%)	1 (6%)
	Rectum	3 (3%)	1 (1%)	2 (12%)
	Hepatic flexure	7 (7%)	5 (6%)	2 (12%)
	Splenic flexure	2 (2%)	2 (2%)	0 (0%)
	Others (ileocecal valve, Appendix)	3 (3%)	1 (1%)	2 (12%)
Tumor Grade*	Not Applicable	1 (1%)	1 (1%)	0 (0%)	.025
	Grade 1 (Well Differentiated)	5 (5%)	5 (6%)	0 (0%)
	Grade 2 (Moderately Differentiated)	84 (84%)	72 (87%)	12 (71%)
	Grade 3 (Poorly Differentiated)	10 (10%)	5 (6%)	5 (29%)
Tumor Stage☥	pT1	11 (11%)	10 (12%)	1 (6%)	.17
	pT2	28 (28%)	22 (27%)	6 (35%)
	pT3	45 (45%)	35 (42%)	10 (59%)
	pT4	16 (16%)	16 (19%)	0 (0%)
Lymph Node Involvement (pN)	pN0	42 (42%)	37 (45%)	5 (29%)	.49
	pN1	36 (36%)	29 (35%)	7 (41%)
	pN2	22 (22%)	17 (20%)	5 (29%)
Metastasis	Absent	84 (84%)	67 (81%)	17 (100%)	.048
	Present	16 (16%)	16 (19%)	0 (0%)

^ɫValues represent lower and upper limits of the confidence interval.

*Tumor grade is set according to the College of American Pathologists Consensus Statement.³⁸

^☥Tumor stage is based on the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM system (8th edition).³⁹

The status of HPVs and EBV and their association with clinicopathological characteristics in CRC

We found that high-risk HPVs are present in 69 of the 100 samples (Figure 1); the most commonly present high-risk HPVs are 52, 18, 59, 31, 45, 51, 35, and 16, respectively. Furthermore, our investigation pointed out that 34/100 cases are positive for only one HPV subtype, while 35/100 were positive for more than one HPV subtype.⁴² Finally, we noted that there is no correlation between HPV infection and clinicopathological characteristics of CRC; However, the coinfection of two or more HPV subtypes strongly correlated with advanced-stage CRC.⁴² According to our data, HPV was found in 11 (16%), 10 (14%), 3 (4%), 18 (26%), 10 (14%), 6 (9%), 2 (3%), 4 (6%), 2 (3%), and 3 (5%) of the samples from the ascending colon, descending colon, transverse colon, sigmoid colon, rectosigmoid colon, cecum, rectum, hepatic flexure, splenic flexure and other colorectal regions respectively.

Figure 1.

Pie-chart depicting the status of HPV & EBV infection in CRC cases in a Qatari cohort.

In addition, 21/100 of the samples were positive for EBV. EBNA1, EBNA2, and LMP1 of EBV are individually present in 54/100, 21/100, and 10/100 CRC cases, respectively. The presence of any two out of these genes in a single sample was classified as positive for the presence of EBV. In contrast, no significant association was observed between the presence of EBV and clinicopathological characteristics (i.e., tumor stage, grade, anatomic location of the tumor, the number of positive lymph nodes, and the presence of metastasis) of the CRC cohort. Our results identified the presence of EBV in 8 (13%), 7 (11%), 3 (5%), 18 (30%), 9 (15%), 4 (7%), 2 (3%), 5 (8%), 2 (3%), 3 (5%) of the samples from the ascending colon, descending colon, transverse colon, sigmoid colon, rectosigmoid colon, cecum, rectum, hepatic flexure, splenic flexure and other colorectal regions respectively.

Status of the copresence of HPVs with EBV and their association with clinicopathological characteristics

According to our data, 27 cases were negative for both virus types, while 52 cases showed the presence of only HPV, and 4 cases showed the presence of only EBV. More significantly, our data revealed the copresence of high-risk HPVs and EBV in 17% of CRC cases (Figure 1); However, we found a significant correlation only between HPV45 and EBV (p = .004) (See Table 2).

Table 2.

Correlation of EBV and HPV subtypes in colorectal cancer patients from Qatar.

Samples	No. of Cases	High-Risk HPV Subtypes
		HPV16	HPV18	HPV31	HPV 35	HPV45	HPV51	HPV52	HPV59
EBV (-)	79	3	26	9	3	7	5	29	15
EBV (+)	21	1	10	5	2	7	1	12	2
Total	100	4	36	14	5	14	6	41	17
p-value		.84	.21	.14	.28	.004	.78	.091	.3

In addition, 7 cases were found to show the copresence of EBV with a single HPV type. Of these seven cases, the most noted copresence was HPV18+EBV (4 cases). Moreover, 4 cases showed the copresence of EBV with two HPV subtypes; here, the most frequent combination was HPV52 & HPV45 + EBV (2 cases). Only a single triple-HPV infection was noted in copresence with EBV (HPV18, HPV31 & HPV52 + EBV). However, EBV was found to be co-present in three and two cases in combination with four and five HPV subtypes, respectively. Table 3 summarizes the observed frequencies of the copresence of EBV with different HPV subtypes.

Table 3.

Coinfection of various HPV subtypes with EBV.

Coinfection of HPV Subtypes with EBV
HPV Subtypes	Cases
Single HPV infection + EBV (n = 7)
HPV16 + EBV	1
HPV18 + EBV	4
HPV52 + EBV	2
Double HPV infections + EBV (n = 4)
HPV18 & HPV52 + EBV	1
HPV35 & HPV52 + EBV	1
HPV52 & HPV45 + EBV	2
Triple HPV infections + EBV (n = 1)
HPV18, HPV31 & HPV52 + EBV	1
Quadruple HPV infections + EBV (n = 3)
HPV18, HPV31, HPV45 & HPV52 + EBV	2
HPV35, HPV45, HPV52 & HPV59 + EBV	1
Quintuple HPV infections + EBV (n = 2)
HPV18, HPV31, HPV45, HPV51 & HPV52 + EBV	1
HPV18, HPV31, HPV45, HPV52 & HPV59 + EBV	1

Initial analysis revealed a higher association between coinfection of HPV (2 or more subtypes) and EBV with advanced colorectal cancer (odds ratio of 1.56). However, after adjusting for potential confounding factors such as age, gender, and histological grade, the association was weaker and not statistically significant, with an odds ratio of 1.01. We found no statistically significant association between advanced colorectal cancer and coinfection with two or more subtypes of HPV along with EBV. (Odds ratio of 1.01, 95% CI 0.22–4.61) (Table 4). However, a coinfection of two or more high-risk subtypes of human papillomavirus (HPV) is a powerful predictor, and EBV infection confounds this association resulting in 4.39 higher odds of developing colorectal cancer (CRC) [OR = 4.39 (95% CI: 1.6–11.98)] compared to individuals without this coinfection. (Table 5).

Table 4.

Association of advanced* colorectal cancer with HPV, two or more subtypes of HPV and EBV coinfection. (n = 100).

Variables	Odds ratio	95% confidence interval	p-value
Unadjusted (EBV)	1.05	0.39–2.82	.92
Unadjusted (Coinfection of HPV & EBV)	0.99	0.36–2.7	.7
Coinfection of HPV & EBV#	0.82	0.28–2.47	.11
Unadjusted (Coinfection with two or subtypes of HPV & EBV)	1.56	0.38–6.41	.53
Coinfection with two or subtypes of HPV & EBV#	1.01	0.22–4.61	.1

^#Adjusted for age, gender, and histological Grade.

Table 5.

Association of advanced colorectal cancer with a coinfection of HPV high-risk subtype as the main predictor and EBV. (n = 100).

Variables	Odds ratio	95% confidence interval	p-value
Unadjusted (HPV as the main predictor and EBV as a confounder)	3.96	1.50–10.47	.013
HPV as the main predictor and EBV as confounder#	4.39	1.6–11.98	.004

^#adjusted for Age, Gender, and Histological Grade.

Discussion

Detection of HPV among CRC FFPE samples from a Qatari cohort

This study is the first to report the individual presence and co-presence of HPV and EBV in colorectal cancer in Qatar. We show that 69% of the 100 colorectal cancer samples from the Qatari population tested positive for HR-HPVs. This is consistent with previous studies that have identified the presence of HPV in many colorectal cancer samples globally, with positivity rates ranging from 40% to 80% of CRC samples.^43–45

The highest prevalence of HPV has been reported in Turkey and Iran; studies have reported the presence of HPV in 81–83% of the CRC samples.^43,45,46 The HPV positivity observed in our study (69%) is concordant with data obtained from studies conducted in Syria³⁵ and Lebanon,³⁶ where HPV-DNA positivity in CRC was observed in (54%) and (64%) of the samples, respectively. Additionally, a moderate HPV prevalence (12–44%) was reported in CRC samples from countries in the Middle East region.^32,47–51 In contrast, a few studies have reported low HPV prevalence (<10%),^37,52–56 while some did not detect the presence of HPV in CRC.^57–60 The variation in HPV positivity rates reported in different studies is partly due to focusing on the presence of specific types of HPV, mostly 16 and 18.^61–63 However, these studies fail to capture the full range of HPV types present in colorectal cancer samples, leading to an underestimation of overall HPV positivity.

Most significantly, we noted a correlation between the advanced stage of CRC with a coinfection of two or more HPV subtypes in our CRC cohort from Qatar (Fernandes et al. submitted). Thus, our results are comparable to other reports stating a similar association between HPV coinfections and disease severity and reduced treatment response in patients.^64–66 These findings suggest that HPV coinfection can have an important role in CRC progression.

Detection of EBV among CRC samples in a Qatar population

Several studies worldwide have linked EBV to the pathogenesis of CRC and reported EBV positivity to fall within the range of 20% to 50%.^32,67–73 In our study, we report the presence of EBV in 21 out of 100 (21%) CRC samples, which falls within the lower end of the range of EBV positivity identified globally. Our study is comparable to data obtained from other Middle East countries like Iran,⁶⁷ Syria,³² and Lebanon,³⁶ where EBV was found in 38%, 36%, and 29% of the CRC cases, respectively. While a few studies have reported a low prevalence of EBV positivity (1–8%) in CRC^74–76 other studies conducted in the Middle East and other regions of the world have failed to detect EBV in CRC.^68,77–81 These contrasting results suggest that the association between EBV and CRC may vary depending on the population and region under study.

EBV has been confirmed as an etiologic factor in the development of several cancers, including nasopharyngeal carcinoma, classical Hodgkin lymphoma, Burkitt lymphoma, and a subset of gastric carcinomas. However, its role in other cancers is still debated. Many studies have shown an association of EBV with advanced stage and aggressive tumor phenotype in cancer.^82–87 However, an equal number of reports have denied such an association.^88–92 As our study did not identify a significant association between the presence of EBV and clinicopathological characteristics, We herein support the latter viewpoint and add to the growing evidence suggesting a lack of association between EBV and clinical indicators of severity and prognosis.

Copresence of EBV with different HPV subtypes

In this study, 17% of colorectal cancer (CRC) samples from Qatar contained both HPV and EBV. This co-presence has been reported in other studies worldwide, with rates ranging from 12% to 50% in various types of cancers.^{25,26,30,38,76,85–88} In comparison, our data presents a comparatively low co-presence of HPV & EBV (17%). However, similar rates have been reported in other studies from the Middle East and MENA region; For example, the copresence of HPV and EBV was detected in 17% and 28% of the CRC samples from Syria³² and Lebanon,³⁶ respectively.

In addition, in our study, EBV was found to be co-present in 7, 4, 1, 3, and 2 cases, along with single, double, triple, quadruple, and quintuple HPV subtypes, respectively. Interestingly, despite HPV52 being the most detected HPV subtype in our sample population (41/100 cases (41%), EBV was found to be co-present almost equally with HPV18 (10/17 cases) as compared to HPV52 (11/17 cases). Moreover, all seven cases positive for HPV45 were found to be co-infected with EBV; Wherein we noted a significant (p = .004) correlation between the two. Our findings suggest that EBV may have a stronger ability to co-infect with certain HPV subtypes, such as HPV18 or HPV 45, to activate more putative oncogenic mechanisms. However, additional analysis is needed to elucidate the mechanisms of HPV and EBV coinfection within the context of HPV-type variations.

We did not observe the correlation between the coinfection of HPV and EBV and clinicopathological characteristics. This is in contrast to other studies from around the world.^82,83

Studies from the MENA region^32,93–95 have reported an association between the coinfection of HPV & EBV and advanced stage, grade, and tumor phenotypes in various types of cancer. However, other studies, including ours, reported a lack of correlation between the copresence of HPV and EBV and the clinicopathological characteristics of tumors. In particular, there was no association between HPV and EBV coinfection and the location of tumors. Interestingly, although the mode of entry of oncoviruses is suspected to be through the anus/rectum, according to our data, coinfection was found to be the highest in the sigmoid colon. Although non-significant, these results do imply the clinical importance of identifying the location of the coinfection within the colon/rectum. In summary, the low prevalence of EBV positivity observed in CRC cases in Qatar may explain the lack of association found in our study.

The association between EBV and HPV subtypes with advanced colorectal cancer is inconclusive due to study limitations like the small sample size and potential confounding factors. The wide confidence interval for the coinfection of EBV and multiple HPV subtypes and advanced colorectal cancer suggests a need for larger studies to determine the true association. Despite these limitations, the current results suggest a potentially significant role for examining coinfection as a predictor of colorectal cancer prognosis, warranting further investigation.

Our study found that coinfection of high-risk subtypes of human papillomavirus (HPV) is a strong predictor of advanced colorectal cancer (CRC). The copresence of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection was identified as an important confounding factor in this association. This highlights the importance of considering these coinfections and potential risk factors for developing advanced stages of CRC. These findings are supported by previous research, which has shown that the coinfection between EBV and multiple high-risk HPV subtypes is linked to advanced tumor phenotypes in CRC.^32,93–95 Coinfection of HPV and EBV is known to play varying roles in the pathogenesis of cancers, ranging from oncogenesis to EMT and metastasis.³¹ Both oncoviruses are known to infect epithelial cells similarly, thus enabling them to transform normal cells into malignant ones. In addition, both viruses can infect and replicate in upper aero-digestive epithelial cells and in the epithelia of the colon and rectum, where they are known to trigger the lytic phases of the HPV and EBV life cycle.³¹ It is generally postulated that EBV can cooperate with other oncoviruses to promote and boost oncogenic transformation and progression in various human carcinomas.^31,96,97 Such cooperative effects among various oncoviruses are found to be plausible drivers of various cancers.³¹

Moreover, coinfection with HPV and EBV, in particular, stimulates EBV persistence via either enhanced viral replication, latency, or through triggering HPV oncoproteins expression.⁹⁸ In addition, both oncoviruses are known to trigger common signaling pathways, such as JAK/STAT/SRC, RAS/MEK/ERK, WNT/β-catenin, and PI3k/Akt/mTOR pathways.^31,99,100 These results emphasize the need to carefully evaluate the role of coinfections in larger studies and consider their putative role in the development of CRC, as this can significantly impact the clinical management of patients.

Conclusions

Our study, for the first time, reports the copresence of high-risk HPVs and EBV in colorectal cancer in Qatar. However, further research involving a larger sample size from various countries in the Gulf region is required to confirm these findings. It is also crucial to understand the cellular and molecular mechanisms that underline the role of coinfection of HPV and EBV in the development of CRC. This study opens the door for further research within the aspect of cooperative oncoviral infections. Moreover, it can also help in assessing the efficacy of high-risk HPVs and future EBV vaccines in preventing CRC progression worldwide and in the Middle East.

Correction Statement

This article has been republished with minor changes. These changes do not impact the academic content of the article.

Funding Statement

Our lab is supported by grants from Qatar University: QUCP-CMED-2021-1.

Author contributions

Conceptualization, A.-E.A.M.; writing – original draft preparation, Q.F., and I.G.; Sample Processing, Q.F., I.G., K.M., H.A.S., and M.P. Statistical Analysis, G.R.B., Review and editing, S.V., H.A.-T., G.R.B., and A.-E.A.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).