Skip to main content
Lippincott Open Access logoLink to Lippincott Open Access
. 2023 Apr 6;65(7):e453–e457. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000002852

Epidemiology of Work-Related Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury

An Analysis of Workers' Compensation Claims in Korea, 2011–2019

Suk Won Bae 1, Hyung-Ik Shin 1, Moon Suk Bang 1, Min-Yong Lee 1
PMCID: PMC10332647  PMID: 37026737

The incidence of TSCI in the cervical region was the highest, accounting for more than half of all TSCI. Moreover, the TSCI cases were concentrated in the construction industry. These findings can help identify specific at-risk groups and facilitate the development of prevention strategies for these devastating injuries.

Keywords: epidemiology, incidence, occupational injuries, spinal cord injuries, worker's compensation

Objective

We aimed to identify the incidence and burden of work-related traumatic spinal cord injury (wrTSCI) in Korea in the 10-year period from 2010 to 2019.

Methods

We used nationwide workers' compensation insurance data. The study population comprised industrially injured workers with TSCI diagnosis codes. The annual incidence of wrTSCI (number per million workers) was calculated.

Results

The mean annual incidence of wrTSCI was 22.8/1,000,000 (95% confidence interval, 20.5 to 25.0), and the mean total cost per claim was 231.40 million KRW. The incidence of TSCI in the cervical region was the highest (13.1/1,000,000; 95% confidence interval, 11.4 to 14.9), and most cases were in the construction industry (47.3%).

Conclusion

These findings can help identify specific at-risk groups and facilitate the development of prevention strategies.


LEARNING OUTCOMES

  • To ascertain the incidence of work-related traumatic spinal cord injury by injury level and industry sector using Korean workers' compensation insurance data over a 10-year period from 2010 to 2019.

  • To identify the claims characteristics based on the level of injury.

  • To identify specific at-risk groups and understand the important implications for developing prevention strategies for these devastating injuries.

Traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI) occurs when an external physical impact acutely damages the spinal cord.1 Although rare, TSCI is a major cause of global disability.2 The annual global incidence of spinal cord injury (SCI) is 40 to 80 per million population,3 and TSCI accounts for approximately 90%. The incidence of TSCI is 39, 16, and 15 per million population in North America, Australia, and Western Europe, respectively.1,4

Because TSCI can have devastating physical, occupational, and sociopsychological impacts,57 their management requires significant resources, and they place a substantial burden on not only the individual and his/her family, but also the community as a whole.5,8 As there is currently no cure for SCI, and most cases do not show significant improvement even after rehabilitation therapy, the healthcare cost of TSCI is considerable.9 In the United States, the cost of SCI-related hospitalizations was estimated at approximately US $1.7 billion in 2009.10 A recent systematic review reported that direct healthcare costs in the first year after TSCI ranged from US $32,240 to $1,156,400 per patient globally.11

Occupational accidents are one of the major causes of TSCI. In Australia and Chile, work-related TSCI (wrTSCI) accounts for 12% to 18% of all TSCI cases.9,12 The epidemiologic characteristics of wrTSCI differ from those of general TSCI.13 For example, patients with non–work-related TSCI may commonly experience incomplete tetraplegia,1,2,14 whereas the most common type of wrTSCI is complete paraplegia.9,12 Because these differences can affect healthcare policy, the epidemiology of wrTSCI needs to be analyzed independently of general TSCI.12 However, the epidemiology of wrTSCI has been seldom reported, and in South Korea, no official reports on the overall incidence of wrTSCI exist.

Therefore, this study aimed to identify the incidence trend and burden of wrTSCI in Korea in a 10-year period between 2010 and 2019, focusing on the level of injury from workers' compensation insurance (WCI) data, which are large-scale nationwide data.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data Source

The Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act was enacted in 1964 as the first social insurance system in Korea. Since then, insurance coverage and compensation have continued to increase. In Korea, workers who require at least 4 days of medical care services or suffer death due to a work-related injury or disease are eligible for compensation. Data on those who are industrially injured are collected by the Korean Ministry of Employment and Labor; WCI data are managed by the Korea Workers' Compensation and Welfare Service. These data include information related to injury and workplace at the time of the work-related accident, as well as information related to medical care and compensation. For this study, we obtained anonymized WCI data from 2010 to 2019 from the Korea Workers' Compensation and Welfare Service.

Study Population

The study population comprised industrially injured workers (IIWs) with TSCI diagnosis codes as the main diagnosis or subdiagnosis during the 10-year period from 2010 to 2019. The International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision diagnostic codes for TSCI used in this study were as follows: cervical: G82.5, S14.0, S14.1, and T06.0; thoracic: S24.0 and S24.1; lumbar: G83.4, S34.0, S34.1, and S34.3; and “unspecified”: G82, G82.2, T06.1, T09.3, and T91.3. The patients were defined by priority in the order of cervical, thoracic, lumbar, and “unspecified.” The final study population included 3855 workers.

Variables

The included variables were age, sex, work-related injury type, occupation sector, industry sector, and compensation.

Age was categorized into five groups in increments of 10 years from <30 to ≥60 years. Work-related injuries were divided into two groups: injury and commuting injury. Occupational classifications followed the Korean Standard Classification of Occupations, based on the International Standard Classification of Occupations, and industrial classifications followed the Korean Standard Industrial Classification based on the International Standard Industrial Classification.

The total cost per claim refers to the total compensation paid to each worker owing to a work-related injury or disease, including medical care, temporary disability, and permanent disability benefits. The cost of medical and similar services refers to medical care benefits, including medical service fees, medication costs, and nursing expenses. Claimants with time lost from work referred to workers who were paid the cost of income replacement. The cost of income replacement refers to the benefits paid to an eligible worker or his/her dependents owing to the worker's temporary disability resulting from a work-related injury or disease. The duration of work disability was estimated by adding the number of inpatient and outpatient days of the IIW.

Statistical Analyses

The annual incidence of wrTSCI (number per million workers) was calculated by dividing the number of workers with TSCI diagnosis codes as the main or subdiagnosis by the total number of workers. Moreover, the incidence was calculated by stratifying TSCI by body region. Incidence by industry sector (number per million workers) was calculated by dividing the number of TSCI cases in the industry by the number of workers in each industry. The denominator used to calculate the incidence rate was derived from data on the number of workers provided by the Korean Ministry of Employment and Labor. In addition, the 10-year trends were assessed using Poisson regression analysis.

The mean and SD values for the continuous variables of the entire study population and classification by body regions were calculated using analysis of variance, whereas the frequency distribution of categorical variables was calculated using the χ2 test.

All analyses were performed using the Statistical Analysis System statistical package (version 9.4; SAS Institute, Cary, NC), with the statistical significance level set at P < 0.05.

RESULTS

Table 1 shows the preinjury demographic characteristics of workers with wrTSCI. The mean and median age was 51.8 and 53 years, respectively, at the time of work-related injury. Work-related TSCI occurred most commonly among those aged 50 to 59 years, with workers 50 years or older accounting for more than half of the cases. Most cases involved men (94.5%) and “injury” as the type of work-related injury (95.8%). With respect to the occupation sector, elementary workers (38.2%) and craft and related trade workers (28.3%) accounted for more than half of the cases. With respect to the industry sector, construction (47.3%) accounted for approximately half of the cases, followed by other sectors (21.3%) and manufacturing (19.4%).

TABLE 1.

Preinjury Demographic Characteristics of Claimants With Work-Related Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury, Korea, 2010–2019

Characteristics Total (n = 3855)
Age at injury, y
 Mean (SD) 51.8 11.3
 Median (IQR) 53 45–60
Age group, n (%)
 <30 163 4.2
 30–39 394 10.2
 40–49 890 23.1
 50–59 1409 36.6
 ≥60 999 25.9
Sex, n (%)
 Male 3644 94.5
 Female 211 5.5
Work-related injury type, n (%)
 Injury 3692 95.8
 Commuting injury 163 4.2
Occupation, n (%)
 Managers 324 8.4
 Professionals and related workers 164 4.3
 Clerks 81 2.1
 Service workers 140 3.6
 Sales workers 43 1.1
 Skilled agricultural, forestry, and fishery workers 109 2.8
 Craft and related trades workers 1091 28.3
 Equipment, machine operating, and assembling workers 430 11.2
 Elementary workers 1473 38.2
Industry, n (%)
 Mining 20 0.5
 Manufacturing 749 19.4
 Electricity, gas, steam, air conditioning, and water supply 9 0.2
 Construction 1824 47.3
 Transportation, storage, information, and communication 281 7.3
 Forestry 99 2.6
 Fishing 4 0.1
 Agriculture 33 6.9
 Financial and insurance activities 15 0.4
 Other 821 21.3

IQR, interquartile range.

During 2010 to 2019, 3855 workers filed claims for wrTSCI (Table 2), which accounted for approximately 0.4% of all claims during that period. With respect to the TSCI region, most cases occurred at the cervical region, followed (in order) by “unspecified,” lumbar, and thoracic regions.

TABLE 2.

Number of Work-Related Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury Claims, Korea, 2010–2019

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Total Incidence*
Cervical 159 188 199 205 193 238 266 260 266 251 2225 13.1 (11.4–14.9)
Thoracic 27 14 22 23 16 22 25 20 21 30 220 1.3 (0.8–1.8)
Lumbar 83 52 74 56 58 61 49 68 63 77 641 3.8 (2.9–4.7)
Unspecified 64 73 64 74 55 64 82 92 104 97 769 4.5 (3.5–5.6)
Total 333 327 359 358 322 385 422 440 454 455 3855 22.8 (20.5–25.0)

*Rates are presented as an average over the 10-year period (rate per 1,000,000).

Figure 1 shows the 10-year trend in wrTSCI incidence. The mean incidence of wrTSCI was 22.8/1,000,000 (95% confidence interval [CI], 20.5 to 25.0), which remained steady from 2010 to 2013, decreased sharply in 2014, and increased again in 2015 (P = 0.320). The incidence of TSCI in the cervical region (13.1/1,000,000; 95% CI, 11.4 to 14.9) accounted for more than half of all TSCIs. With respect to the 10-year trend by region, only “unspecified” showed a repeating pattern of statistically significant increase and decrease up to 2014, followed by an increasing trend starting from 2015 (P = 0.002). The mean mortality rate associated with wrTSCI was 1.7/1,000,000 (95% CI, 1.1 to 2.3), with most cases involving an injury in the cervical region (Supplementary Table 1, http://links.lww.com/JOM/B325).

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Incidence of work-related traumatic spinal cord injury among all workers, Korea, 2010–2019.

The three industry sectors with the highest number of wrTSCI cases were construction (47.3%); manufacturing (19.4%); and transportation, storage, information, and communication (7.3%). Industry sectors with the highest mean incidence of TSCI were mining (169.6/1,000,000; 95% CI, 95.3 to 244.0), forestry (117.7/1,000,000; 95% CI, 94.5 to 140.9), and fishing (83.7/1,000,000; 95% CI, 1.7 to 165.8). The mean incidence within the construction industry was 61.0/1,000,000 (95% CI, 58.2 to 63.8) (Table 3).

TABLE 3.

Number of Work-Related Traumatic Spinal Cord Injuries by Industry Sector Among All Workers in Korea, 2010–2019

Industry Sector 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Average Incidence*
n % n % n % n % n % n % n % n % n % n % n %
Mining 2 0.6 3 0.9 3 0.8 3 0.8 2 0.6 2 0.5 4 1.0 1 0.2 0 0.0 0 0.0 2.0 0.5 169.6 (95.3–244.0)
Manufacturing 70 21.0 59 18.0 70 19.5 72 20.1 63 19.6 65 16.9 90 21.3 88 20.0 73 16.1 99 21.8 74.9 19.4 19.3 (17.9–20.7)
Electricity, gas, steam, air conditioning, and water supply 1 0.3 1 0.3 1 0.3 0 0.0 2 0.6 1 0.3 1 0.2 0 0.0 0 0.0 2 0.4 0.9 0.2 13.9 (4.8–23.0)
Construction 142 42.6 162 49.5 159 44.3 169 47.2 154 47.8 199 51.7 194 46.0 234 53.2 205 45.2 206 45.3 182.4 47.3 61.0 (58.2–63.8)
Transportation, storage, information, and communication 25 7.5 23 7.0 31 8.6 27 7.5 17 5.3 27 7.0 32 7.6 27 6.1 39 8.6 33 7.3 28.1 7.3 34.9 (30.8–39.0)
Forestry 14 4.2 10 3.1 11 3.1 13 3.6 8 2.5 9 2.3 12 2.8 5 1.1 8 1.8 9 2.0 9.9 2.6 117.7 (94.5–140.9)
Fishing 0 0.0 0 0.0 2 0.6 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 0.2 1 0.2 0.4 0.1 83.7 (1.7–165.8)
Agriculture 2 0.6 3 0.9 4 1.1 3 0.8 4 1.2 2 0.5 2 0.5 4 0.9 5 1.1 4 0.9 3.3 0.9 52.0 (34.3–69.8)
Financial and insurance activities 1 0.3 0 0.0 3 0.8 3 0.8 1 0.3 2 0.5 2 0.5 0 0.0 2 0.4 1 0.2 1.5 0.4 2.1 (1.1–3.2)
Other 76 22.8 66 20.2 75 20.9 68 19.0 71 22.1 78 20.3 85 20.1 81 18.4 121 26.7 100 22.0 82.1 21.3 9.8 (9.2–10.5)

*Rates are presented as an average over the 10-year period (rate per 1,000,000).

Table 4 shows the claims characteristics of wrTSCI. Among all the workers with TSCI, 97.3% experienced time lost from work, whereas 98.7% received inpatient hospital treatment. The mean duration of disability for workers with TSCI was 838.3 days, and the mean total cost per claim was 231.40 million KRW. Workers with injuries in “unspecified” regions had the longest mean duration of work disability and the highest mean total cost per claim (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively).

TABLE 4.

Claims Characteristics of Work-Related Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury by Body Region, Korea, 2010–2019

Claims Total Cervical Thoracic Lumbar Unspecified P*
All Claimants, n 3855 2225 220 641 769
 Time lost from work, n (%) 3750 97.3 2153 96.8 216 98.2 630 98.3 751 97.7 0.124
 Inpatient hospital stay, n (%) 3806 98.7 2192 98.5 215 97.7 633 98.8 766 99.6 0.063
 Duration of work disability
  Mean (SD) no. days 838.3 828.4 825.9 852.1 980.1 904.7 659.2 619.8 982.7 856.4 <0.001
  Median (IQR) no. days 577 276–1048 530 252–1047 725.5 310–1326.5 476 267–824 791 391–1216
 Claim costs paid, million KRW
  Mean (SD) total cost per claim 231.40 224.05 220.59 227.37 289.50 233.43 175.65 167.30 292.51 235.98 <0.001
  Mean (SD) cost of medical and similar services 121.55 151.57 120.84 157.17 143.09 139.82 76.25 96.97 155.20 165.42 <0.001
  Mean (SD) cost of income replacement 41.60 33.70 39.14 33.01 45.40 31.48 40.08 33.04 48.92 35.73 <0.001
Time-loss claims†
 Claim costs paid, million KRW
  Mean (SD) total cost per claim 235.22 221.57 225.67 228.93 293.21 233.85 178.09 167.43 293.88 220.01 <0.001
  Mean (SD) cost of medical and similar services 146.70 61.69 124.70 158.31 145.51 139.95 77.31 97.33 154.98 138.49 <0.001
  Mean (SD) cost of income replacement 42.77 33.44 40.45 32.75 46.24 31.15 40.78 32.90 50.09 35.33 <0.001

ANOVA, analysis of variance; IQR, interquartile range; KRW, Korean Won.

*P value from the χ2 test (categorical variables) or ANOVA (continuous variable).

†Analyses restricted to claimants with >0 claim costs paid for time lost from work.

DISCUSSION

This is the first epidemiological study on wrTSCI in Korea, comprising an in-depth analysis focusing on body regions. Our data show the overall absolute number of cases of acute wrTSCI. We calculated the incidence of wrTSCI by injury level and industry sector using Korean WCI data over a 10-year period from 2010 to 2019. We also reported the claims characteristics based on the level of injury.

Our study is one of few to examine the incidence of wrTSCI. Work-related TSCI comprised approximately 20% of all TSCI cases in Korea.5 Our findings were similar to those of other studies reporting that wrTSCI accounted for 12% to 18% of all TSCI cases.9,12 The mean incidence of wrTSCI was 22.8 per million workers, which was higher than that reported in Australia and Chile.9,12 The mean incidence of wrTSCI was 4 per million workers in Australia (1986 to 1997), whereas that in Chile (1986 to 2005) was 7.8 per million workers.9,12 Although the study conducted in Chile included only 25% of the country's active working population, the incidence in Korea was higher. However, we analyzed nationwide WCI data, which included almost all workers in the country. These differences in the methodology may have minimized the risk of underestimation in this study.

The incidence of wrTSCI was relatively stable between 2010 and 2013 but decreased sharply in 2014 and gradually increased again from 2015. The decrease in incidence in 2014 can be viewed not as a decrease in the number of IIWs but as an expansion of coverage through the application of WCI.15,16 The number of workplaces covered by the WCI increased significantly in 2014; hence, the number of workers covered by insurance increased significantly (10.4%) compared with that in the previous year.17 This could have contributed to the temporary decrease in incidence. Therefore, the expanded WCI coverage could have influenced the incidence rate. Moreover, the subsequent increase in incidence could be attributed to the increased number of IIWs due to the abolition of the employer confirmation system for improved accessibility, which enabled workers to file for claims due to industrial injuries.16,18

The incidence of TSCI in the cervical region was the highest, accounting for more than half of all TSCI cases (approximately 57%). This finding is similar to that of the epidemiology of the whole TSCI. In Europe, the proportion of cases of cervical TSCI ranged from 40% to 60%, whereas in the United States, 55.7% of new TSCI cases since 2000 were cervical injuries.19 Meanwhile, our results contradicted those of an Australian study on workers with TSCI who reported paraplegia and tetraplegia in 68% and 32% of cases, respectively.9 This difference may be attributable to the composition of the study population. In an Australian study, 75% of the study population was aged 25 to 54 years; however, in our study, more than half (64.5%) of the study population consisted of older workers 50 years or older. Cervical TSCI is often caused by relatively minor trauma, such as a fall on a level surface in patients with degenerative spinal conditions, including spondylosis and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament.20 Actually, cervical TSCI occurs more frequently in older people.21 Therefore, it is necessary to strengthen education on falls prevention among older workers.

Our study reveals the characteristics of wrTSCI cases by industry sector. Mining was the industry sector with the highest mean incidence of wrTSCI; however, the actual number of cases in this sector was relatively small. Most wrTSCI cases were encountered in construction (47.3%); manufacturing (19.4%); and transportation, storage, information, and communication (7.3%) industries. These industries have hazardous working conditions and require physical labor. In particular, the number of cases in the construction industry was significantly higher than those in the other industry sectors. Our results are consistent with the findings of similar studies on IIWs in the United States (1986 to 1991) and Chile (1986 to 2005), which also reported that the construction industry was most significantly associated with TSCI (41.9% and 22.0%, respectively).12,22 Falls are a major cause of TSCI,9,2325 and the construction industry has an extremely high risk of falls.12 In Korea, workers undergo occupational safety and health training18; however, it would be prudent to further emphasize precautionary measures against falls and the importance of wearing safety equipment at construction sites for workers.

Traumatic spinal cord injury has a significant impact on individuals and has tremendous economic costs. In our study, the mean total cost per claim was 231.40 million KRW (approximately US $160,000). This cost is more than double that of the mean total cost per claim (90.29 million KRW) in moderate to severe work-related traumatic brain injury in Korea.18 A US study of work-related tetraplegia reported that the mean first-year medical cost was US $178,041 to $560,524 per case, depending on the severity (1989 to 1999).13 In studies on the medical costs of TSCI, the mean cost for the acute phase (initial injury and recovery phase) of TSCI was US $142,366 per case in the United States (2009),26 and the total direct cost of medical services in the TSCI population was US $108,986 per case for the first year in Ontario, Canada (2003 to 2005).27 In our study, the medical cost per claim was 121.55 million KRW (approximately US $84,000), which was rather low compared with the above results in the United States and Canada. Although a subsequent analysis of these differences is required, our findings can help raise awareness of the financial burden, provide evidence for funding of care, and design additional research.27

Our study had the following strengths. This is the first study on the epidemiology of wrTSCI in Korea. Second, the WCI data used in our study were nationally representative data that included demographic information, work-related accident information, and medical care and compensation information in almost all IIW cases in Korea. Therefore, the findings of our study are representative of IIWs in Korea.

Our study had some limitations. First, the data were based on the year when the work-related accident occurred; therefore, the cost per claim may have been underreported for workers who did not complete their claims or finished receiving care, which may have affected the results. Second, because of restricted access to data on the age and sex of workers, age- and sex-standardized incidence could not be obtained. Third, the WCI data did not include information on the neurological level of SCI. Therefore, workers with G82, G82.2, T06.1, T09.3, or T91.3 as the main or subdiagnosis were classified as “unspecified.” Hence, additional data regarding the level of lesions in the early phase of work-related accidents in workers with SCI are required.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first epidemiological study of wrTSCI in Korea. The mean incidence of wrTSCI was 22.8 per million workers. This incidence remained relatively stable between 2010 and 2013, decreased sharply in 2014, and then gradually increased from 2015 onward. The incidence of TSCI in the cervical region was the highest, accounting for more than half of all TSCIs. Moreover, the TSCI cases were concentrated in the construction industry. The mean total cost of wrTSCI per claim was 231.40 million KRW. These findings can help identify specific at-risk groups and facilitate the development of prevention strategies for these devastating injuries.

Supplementary Material

joem-65-e453-s001.docx (56.4KB, docx)
joem-65-e453-s002.docx (14.7KB, docx)

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors thank the Korea Workers' Compensation and Welfare Service for making this study possible and providing data from the Korean WCI claims.

Footnotes

Ethical considerations and disclosures: This study was exempt from ethical approval by the institutional review board (IRB) of Seoul National University Hospital (IRB no. E-2207-149-1342) because the data in the KCOMWEL were anonymized and deidentified. Therefore, the need for informed consent was also waived.

Funding sources: This work was supported by the Korea Workers' Compensation and Welfare Service, grant no. 0720185002.

Conflict of interest: None declared.

Author Contributions: S.W.B. conceived and planned the study, performed the analysis, wrote the original draft with input from all the authors, visualized the results, validated the study, and contributed to the interpretation of the results. H.-I.S. conceived and planned the study, performed the analyses, and validated the study. M.S.B. conceived and planned the study and visualized the results. M.-Y.L. conceived and planned the study, validated it, contributed to the interpretation of the results, and supervised the entire process. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Supplemental digital contents are available for this article. Direct URL citation appears in the printed text and is provided in the HTML and PDF versions of this article on the journal’s Web site (www.joem.org).

Contributor Information

Suk Won Bae, Email: newzzanggu@hanmail.net.

Hyung-Ik Shin, Email: hyungik1@snu.ac.kr.

Moon Suk Bang, Email: msbang@snu.ac.kr.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Ahuja CS Wilson JR Nori S, et al. Traumatic spinal cord injury. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2017;3:17018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kumar R Lim J Mekary RA, et al. Traumatic spinal injury: global epidemiology and worldwide volume. World Neurosurg 2018;113:e345–e363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kang Y Ding H Zhou H, et al. Epidemiology of worldwide spinal cord injury: a literature review. J Neurorestoratol 2018;6:1–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Cripps RA, Lee BB, Wing P, Weerts E, Mackay J, Brown D. A global map for traumatic spinal cord injury epidemiology: towards a living data repository for injury prevention. Spinal Cord 2011;49:493–501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Choi SH, Sung CH, Heo DR, Jeong SY, Kang CN. Incidence of acute spinal cord injury and associated complications of methylprednisolone therapy: a national population-based study in South Korea. Spinal Cord 2020;58:232–237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.McCammon JR, Ethans K. Spinal cord injury in Manitoba: a provincial epidemiological study. J Spinal Cord Med 2011;34:6–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Pickett W, Simpson K, Walker J, Brison RJ. Traumatic spinal cord injury in Ontario, Canada. J Trauma 2003;55:1070–1076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Chamberlain JD, Ronca E, Brinkhof MW. Estimating the incidence of traumatic spinal cord injuries in Switzerland: using administrative data to identify potential coverage error in a cohort study. Swiss Med Wkly 2017;147:w14430. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.O'Connor P. Work related spinal cord injury, Australia 1986–97. Inj Prev 2001;7:29–34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Mahabaleshwarkar R, Khanna R. PSU37 national inpatient burden associated with spinal cord injuries in the United States. Value Health 2012;15:A80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Malekzadeh H Golpayegani M Ghodsi Z, et al. Direct cost of illness for spinal cord injury: a systematic review. Global Spine J 2022;12:1267–1281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Correa GI Finkelstein JM Burnier LA, et al. Work-related traumatic spinal cord lesions in Chile, a 20-year epidemiological analysis. Spinal Cord 2011;49:196–199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Webster B, Giunti G, Young A, Pransky G, Nesathurai S. Work-related tetraplegia: cause of injury and annual medical costs. Spinal Cord 2004;42:240–247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Chen Y, He Y, DeVivo MJ. Changing demographics and injury profile of new traumatic spinal cord injuries in the United States, 1972–2014. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2016;97:1610–1619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kwon SC, Kim HR, Kwon YJ. The administrative process for recognition and compensation for occupational diseases in Korea. J Korean Med Sci 2014;29:S3–S11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Bae SW, Won JU, Park WM. Prediction model for job retention according to the type of return to work among industrially injured workers in Korea. J Occup Environ Med 2023;65:e16–e20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ministry of Employment and Labor . Analysis of occupational accidents; 2019. 2021. Available at: https://www.moel.go.kr/policy/policydata/view.do;jsessionid=tXUx89oTo3qCX6ZkfX7hM1QlxgBdWwrghZ7jVhb8sxqsN3FLJUa4S8eSSm9gH8Q9.moel_was_outside_servlet_www2?bbs_seq=20210101255. Accessed October 4, 2022.
  • 18.Bae SW, Lee MY. Incidence of traumatic brain injury by severity among work-related injured workers from 2010 to 2019: an analysis of workers' compensation insurance data in Korea. J Occup Environ Med 2022;64:731–736. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.DeVivo MJ. Epidemiology of traumatic spinal cord injury: trends and future implications. Spinal Cord 2012;50:365–372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Nakajima H Yokogawa N Sasagawa T, et al. Prognostic factors for cervical spinal cord injury without major bone injury in elderly patients. J Neurotrauma 2022;39:658–666. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kudo D Miyakoshi N Hongo M, et al. An epidemiological study of traumatic spinal cord injuries in the fastest aging area in Japan. Spinal Cord 2019;57:509–515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Rosenberg NL, Gerhart K, Whiteneck G. Occupational spinal cord injury: demographic and etiologic differences from non-occupational injuries. Neurology 1993;43:1385–1385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Jain NB Ayers GD Peterson EN, et al. Traumatic spinal cord injury in the United States, 1993–2012. JAMA 2015;313:2236–2243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ferro S, Cecconi L, Bonavita J, Pagliacci MC, Biggeri A, Franceschini M. Incidence of traumatic spinal cord injury in Italy during 2013–2014: a population-based study. Spinal Cord 2017;55:1103–1107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.O'Connor P. Incidence and patterns of spinal cord injury in Australia. Accid Anal Prev 2002;34:405–415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Mahabaleshwarkar R, Khanna R. National hospitalization burden associated with spinal cord injuries in the United States. Spinal Cord 2014;52:139–144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Munce SE Wodchis WP Guilcher SJ, et al. Direct costs of adult traumatic spinal cord injury in Ontario. Spinal Cord 2013;51:64–69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer Health

RESOURCES