Abstract
Nearly 70% of Uterine fibroid (UF) tumors are driven by recurrent MED12 hotspot mutations. Unfortunately, no cellular models could be generated because the mutant cells have lower fitness in 2D culture conditions. To address this, we employ CRISPR to precisely engineer MED12 Gly44 mutations in UF-relevant myometrial smooth muscle cells. The engineered mutant cells recapitulate several UF-like cellular, transcriptional, and metabolic alterations, including altered Tryptophan/kynurenine metabolism. The aberrant gene expression program in the mutant cells is, in part, driven by a substantial 3D genome compartmentalization switch. At the cellular level, the mutant cells gain enhanced proliferation rates in 3D spheres and form larger lesions in vivo with elevated production of collagen and extracellular matrix deposition. These findings indicate that the engineered cellular model faithfully models key features of UF tumors and provides a platform for the broader scientific community to characterize genomics of recurrent MED12 mutations.
Subject terms: Cancer epigenetics, Cancer epigenetics, Nuclear organization, Chromatin structure
There are currently a lack of genetic models to study the biology of Uterine fibroids (UFs) tumours. Here the authors precisely engineer cells with mutant MED12 Gly-44 and generate myometrial smooth muscle cells (SMCs) that recapitulate major UFs-like cellular, transcriptional, and metabolic alterations.
Introduction
Uterine fibroids (UFs), also known as uterine myoma, leiomyomas, and myoma uteri, are benign monoclonal neoplasms of the myometrium1. UFs represent the most common gynecologic tumors among reproductive-age women1,2. By the age of 50 years, more than 70% of all women (70% white and >80% black) develop at least one fibroid tumor. UFs are non-malignant and not symptomatic in the majority of cases; however, in 15–30% of cases, they disrupt normal uterine functions, resulting in a wide range of severe health problems, including excessive uterine bleeding, anemia, defective implantation of an embryo, recurrent pregnancy loss, preterm labor and obstruction of labor and may mimic or mask malignant tumors in 15–30% of reproductive-age women1. Few medical treatments are available for UFs, and many women opt to undergo a surgical hysterectomy. However, such procedures create significant emotional stress on individual patients and a substantial financial burden on society. These practices are estimated to cost $5.9–$34.4 billion in the USA alone3.
Advanced genomic tools, including high-throughput sequencing methods, identified recurrent and largely mutually exclusive genetic alterations in UFs. Notably, nearly 70% of UFs tumors harbor somatic mutations in the MED12 gene, encoding the Mediator Complex Subunit 12 (MED12)4. Furthermore, translocation in the high mobility group AT-hook 2 (HMGA2) gene, recurrent loss of fumarate hydratase (FH), and deletion of collagen COL4A5-COL4A6 gene are among other recurrent somatic genetic alterations5. Recently, Berta et al. identified inactivating mutations in members of the SRCAP complex, which result in H2A.Z loading defects, as additional genetic defects in UFs6. Integrated data analysis reveals mutation-specific distinct driver gene expression programs and biomarkers in UFs6,7, indicating the importance of studying and revealing the mutation-specific aberrant driver targets in UFs.
The mediator complex is a critical determinant of overall genome organization and gene expression program8–11. Early reports established that the mediator complex controls transcription initiation and elongation by bridging the regulatory elements (enhancers) with gene promoters and facilitating the RNA polymerase II transcriptional initiation11,12. However, more recent evidence suggests a more complex role of the Mediator complex in overall gene expression and 3D genome organization13–15. Therefore, the complex is critical for conveying the information between gene-specific transcription factors and the basal RNA polymerase II transcriptional assembly8,9. The mediator is structurally assembled from a set of 26 core subunits in humans arrange into three distinct modules: head, middle, and tail, that bind to Pol II as a “holoenzyme”16–19. The proper function of these core modules is regulated by a detachable CDK8 kinase module9,19, which consists of MED12, CDK8, Cyclin C, and MED13. MED12-dependent CDK8 activation is a critical regulator of the Mediator complex, as oncogenic MED12 mutations disrupt its allosteric regulation of CDK819–21. MED12 connects Cyclin C and CDK8 to the core Mediator and is required for the kinase activity of the CDK8 submodule8,22. Recent findings indicate that the MED12-containing CDK8 subcomplex can also function independently of the mediator complex22. MED12 is involved in several cancer-related signaling pathways related to nuclear receptors, Wnt, and Sonic Hedgehog10,23,24.
MED12 consists of 45 exons and is located in the q13 arm of the X chromosome. Initial exome sequencing revealed that 70% of UFs patients display recurrent MED12 mutations4, making it the most frequently altered gene UFs4,5,25. This finding has been replicated in several studies of various ethnic groups, reporting MED12 mutation frequencies in up to 92% of all UFs25. Significantly, UFs-associated MED12 mutations are missense mutations that affect the highly conserved region in exon 2. The prevalence of UFs-linked mutations in MED12 (60%) is missense mutations that add substitutions at three highly conserved MED12 amino acids: 50% Gly-44 and 10% (Leu-36 and Gln-43); the other 40% of MED12 mutations related to UFs correspond to missense mutations at different residues or small in-frame insertions and omissions4,25. The recurrent alteration in patient samples and the data from the engineered mouse model suggest that altering the Glycine at the 44 amino acid leads to a gain of function “oncogene” mutation that drives UFs tumorigenesis26.
UFs tumors are believed to originate mono-clonally from a single mutated smooth muscle cell (SMC). However, the mutated SMC co-exists with non-mutated tumor-associated fibroblasts (TAF) in vivo27. Critically, when cultured in vitro, these WT fibroblasts outgrow the mutant cells, resulting in the loss of mutant cells and conversion of the population to WT phenotype28,29. This hampered the development of cellular models to deeply characterize MED12 mutations, understand the molecular pathways downstream of these mutations and develop therapeutic targets to inhibit UFs tumorigenesis. To overcome this formidable challenge, we employ CRISPR-mediated homology-directed repair (HDR) to precisely engineer a Gly-44 mutation (Gly→Asn) in a UFs-relevant myometrial SMC line. Critically, the cellular, molecular, and metabolic profiling of the engineered cells highlights that MED12 Gly-44 mutation recapitulates major cellular and molecular phenotypes of MED12 mutant UFs tumors, including altered proliferation, fibroid-like transcriptional program, and genomic instability, indicating that the engineered cells faithfully model several molecular features of UFs biology. Significantly, our transcriptional and 3D genome mapping and analysis show that MED12 Gly-44 mutations lead to genome-wide 3D chromatin organization and genome compartmentalization.
Results
Engineering MED12 Gly-44 mutation in clonal myometrium smooth muscle cells
Notably, more than 50% of all MED12 exon two mutations are in the 44th codon and mutate Glycine into at least six other amino acids (aa), indicating the significance of Glycine at this position for proper MED12 function. We set out to use CRISPR to knock in a respective mutation containing a DNA template in exon 2 of the MED12 gene in immortalized myometrial SMC line that retains the expression of various markers of primary SMC30. We utilized a CRISPR-based knock-in and qPCR-based single-cell colony selection strategy31 (Fig. 1a and Supplementary Fig. 1) to introduce Gly-44→Asn mutation in exon 2 of MED12 and select single-cell colonies. The knock-in template is designed to disrupt the PAM sequence while altering the amino acid at the 44th codon. We transiently delivered WT Cas9, sgRNA, and a custom-designed knock-in single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) oligo template through nucleofection. We then single-cell-sorted, grew individual nucleofected cells, and performed qPCR-based colony screening on genomic DNA from >400 single-cell colonies (Supplementary Fig. 2). We obtained multiple clonal cell lines that are homozygous and heterozygous for Gly-44 mutations (Fig. 1b, c). We validated the WT and mutant allele frequency using CRISPR-TIDER analysis (Supplementary Fig. 3). Critically, since MED12 is on the X chromosome, one allele undergoes random epigenetic inactivation. Thus, we performed additional screening from the cDNA of the single-cell clones to identify several clonal cell lines expressing the mutant Gly-44 MED12 in the mRNA as validated by cDNA sequencing (Fig. 1c). Western blot analysis shows that the Gly-44 mutation does not alter MED12 protein stability (Fig. 1d).
MED12 Gly-44 mutation recapitulates UFs-specific proliferation defects
A formidable challenge in establishing an in vitro model of fibroid tumors has been the rapid disappearance of cells carrying MED12 mutations when the fibroid tumor cells are cultured in vitro28,29. This is believed to be due to a reduced proliferative capacity in 2D culture conditions in vitro. To test whether such a slower proliferation defect can cause the disappearance of mutant cells from the population, we initially analyzed the mixed population of cells right after the CRISPR knock-in. Our targeted sequencing and CRISPR-TIDER analysis indicated that the mixed population contained ~36% WT allele, 7% knock-in allele (Gly-44 mutant), and 57% indel alleles (likely MED12 KO) after initial CRISPR editing. We then continuously cultured this mixed population and performed targeted sequencing at exon 2 of MED12 at the 4th, 6th, 7th, and 9th weeks after the initial gene editing. Significantly, we observed that the mixed population reached ~100% WT allele while gradually losing both the Gly-44 mutant and the indel alleles (Fig. 1e), supporting the observed phenotype of MED12 mutant primary SMC cells28,29. To quantify the proliferation defects in these cells more precisely, we studied clonally expanded pure populations (from single cells) of MED12 WT, Gly-44 mutant, or KO SMC cells. We used Incucyte live cell imaging platform to robustly detect cell proliferation defects by monitoring individual nuclei counts over several days. Critically, the Gly-44 mutant cells are less proliferative than WT cells but better than the KO cells (Fig. 1f). The time course experiment indicates that the WT cells double in ~23 h, whereas the MED12 Gly-44 mutant cells double every ~32 h in 2D adherent conditions. Although interesting, these findings raised the question of how such a mutation drives UFs tumorigenesis if it leads to reduced cell proliferation. We, therefore, tested whether the reduced proliferation is due to the restrictive 2D culture conditions.
The MED12 Gly44 mutation increased cell-autonomous and non-autonomous proliferation capacity
MED12 Gly-44 mutations are causal in inducing higher cell proliferation and, eventually, fibroid tumor formation in humans and mice4,32. To understand whether the reduced proliferation phenotype is an artifact of 2D culture conditions, we cultured the WT and the engineered mutant cells in 3D spheroid conditions. Notably, the MED12 mutants formed significantly larger spheroids than WT cells (Fig. 1g, h), indicating the significance of culture conditions in studying MED12 mutations. On average, we observed that MED12 mutant spheres grew 2–4 times larger than the WT colonies. At the same time, the KO cells did not form any spheres, indicating that the engineered MED12 Gly-44 mutation is UFs-relevant and is a gain-of-function mutation.
Notably, the MED12 mutant UFs are composed of mutant SMCs and non-mutant tumor-associated fibroblasts and stromal cells at nearly equal rates27, suggesting that the mutant cells cause the proliferation of non-mutant cells in a cell non-autonomous fashion. To test whether the engineered mutant cells will also increase the proliferation in non-mutant cells, we performed co-cultured experiments with fluorescently labeled (mCherry) non-mutant cells. We quantified the rate of proliferation in fluorescently labeled non-mutant cells. In line with the data in Fig. 1g, we observed larger spheroids when mutant cells were cultured with non-mutant. We dissociated the spheroids to reveal whether the larger spheroid formation is partly due to the increased proliferation of non-mutant cells. We counted the number of mCherry (+) cells from each condition (Supplementary Fig. 4a). In line with this, we found that the non-mutant cells proliferate at significantly higher levels (p > 0.001, t test) in conditioned media (20%) from MED12 mutant cells compared to media alone or condition media (20%) from non-mutant cells (Supplementary Fig. 4b). These findings indicated that mutant cells enhance the proliferation capacity of the non-mutant cells in the microenvironment.
These results led us to investigate further the proliferation and potential tumor formation capacity of these cells in vivo using a kidney capsule xenograft model. Notably, the MED12 mutant cells grew a solid lesion, while wild-type cells remained an indiscernible thin layer on the surface of the kidney (Fig. 1i). Since extracellular matrix (ECM) deposition is a hallmark of UFs, we measured the overall composition of ECM and collagen by performing Masson’s trichrome staining, highlighting the overall connective tissues, mainly collagen, in tissue sections33. Notably, the tumor-like lesions from MED12 mutant cells contained significantly higher levels of staining (p < 0.001, t test) compared to regenerated tissue from WT cells, indicating substantially more ECM and collagen production in the lesions from MED12 mutant cells (Fig. 1j).
The engineered MED12 Gly-44 mutation alters the global metabolism in smooth muscle cells
The altered proliferation rates are driven by overall cellular metabolic and transcriptional reprogramming. Uterine fibroid tumors have distinct metabolic and bioenergetic needs. For example, uterine fibroid tumors are known to be depleted of Tryptophan but replete with Kynurenine, a product of Tryptophan metabolism34. We, therefore, set out to investigate global metabolite levels in WT and mutant cells by performing Liquid Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS) to acquire signals from a broad spectrum of water-soluble metabolites (250 plus targets). The principal component analysis (PCA) of overall metabolite contents (Supplementary Data 1) indicates that the WT and MED12 mutant cells have distinct metabolic states as each formed distinct clusters based on the top two principal components (Fig. 2a), indicating the significant metabolic differences between these two cells. Specifically, MED12 mutation leads to the downregulation of 14 metabolites while upregulating, a larger number, of 21 metabolites (Fig. 2b, c). Critically, increased 5-HIAA, Kynurenine, thiamine, N-carbomyl-l-aspartate, and reduced Tryptophan, mevalonic acid, N-acetyl aspartic acid, glyceraldehyde were the top differentially regulated metabolites. Tryptophan is an essential amino acid that the body needs to acquire from the diet and is metabolized into Kynurenine. Our detailed quantifications show that while Tryptophan is significantly (p < 0.01, t test) depleted in MED12 mutant cells, Kynurenine levels are abnormally elevated (p < 0.01, t test) (Fig. 2d). In line with this, Tryptophan metabolism was the top enriched metabolic term when all differentially regulated metabolites were analyzed together (Fig. 2e). Notably, our group previously reported that the reduced Tryptophan levels in MED12 mutant uterine fibroids are driven by increased levels and activity of an enzyme called Tryptophan 2,3-Dioxygenase-2 (TDO2) that converts Tryptophan into Kynurenine35. We, therefore, tested whether our engineered cells have elevated levels of TDO2 protein. Critically, the western blot analysis shows that the mutant cells have markedly increased levels of TDO2, whose levels are not detectable in WT and the MED12 KO cells (Fig. 2f). These findings highlight that the engineered Gly-44 mutation recapitulates known metabolic reprogramming in primary UFs tumors34,35.
The MED12 Gly-44 mutant cells have distinct transcriptional states
We next assessed overall transcriptional reprogramming downstream of Med12 Gly-44 mutation by performing RNA-Seq in two separate MED12 Gly-44 mutant clones, the WT and MED12 KO cells, in triplicate. Notably, >90% of the genes (2124/2359) between WT and mutant cells were consistent across the mutant clones, indicating the robustness of MED12 mutation-driven transcriptional changes. Less than 5% (104 or 131/2359) of differentially expressed genes were clone-specific, indicating the robustness of MED12 mutations and minimal clonal heterogeneity compared to WT clones. Differential expression analysis showed that MED12 mutation drives the differential expression of ~2000 genes, consistent in both MED12 mutant clones (987 upregulated and 1137 downregulated, (p-adj<0.05) (Fig. 3a). Most critically, the MED12 Gly-44 mutations resulted in differential expression of a distinct set of genes compared to MED12 knock-out cells (Supplementary Fig. 5), supporting the overall hypothesis that the UFs-associated MED12 mutations are not loss of function, but a gain of function mutations.
The aberrant transcriptional program of MED12 Gly-44 mutant cells is reminiscent of fibroid tumors
To assess whether these differentially expressed genes are comparable and relevant to fibroid tumors, we analyzed them with the recent gene expression program of normal myometrium (n = 15) and MED12 mutation harboring fibroid tumors (n = 15) as previously reported by Moyo et al.36. We detected ~5500 differentially expressed genes (p-adj<0.01) between normal myometrium and UFs samples (Fig. 3b). Notably, the gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) highlighted several hallmarks shared among the mutant cells and primary fibroid tumors. For example, hallmarks of cell cycle-related genes, MYC and E2F target genes, and DNA repair genes are substantially upregulated in the mutant cells and primary UFs.
On the other hand, protein secretion and heme metabolism genes are among the most downregulated genes. (Fig. 3c). In line with GSEA, the gene ontology (GO) analyses on differentially expressed genes in Gly-44 mutant cells and fibroid tumors identified a common set of biological processes between these two samples. For example, the upregulated genes in Gly-44 mutant and fibroid tumors are enriched for cell cycle and DNA replication-related gene ontology (GO) terms (Supplementary Fig. 6). Conversely, the downregulated genes in our MED12 mutant cells and primary fibroids included a group of cell adhesion and extracellular matrix (ECM) reorganization genes, indicating that Gly-44 mutation also recapitulates the abnormal ECM feature of human UFs37,38.
We next assessed the epigenome of these cells to see whether MED12 mutation leads to aberrant gene expression changes through the altered epigenome. Since MED12 is a critical regulator that mediates promoter-enhancer interaction, we acquired a Genome-wide map of Histone H3 Lysine 27 acetylation (H3K27ac), which is associated with enhanced transcriptional activation of histone modification which marks active enhancers and promoters39,40 by Cut&Tag41. Differential peak analysis identified that 4904 peaks gained the H3K27ac mark. At the same time, 482 of the regulatory elements nearly lost all H3K27ac signal (Fig. 3e), indicating that MED12 Gly-44 mutation results in increased genomic activity at most regulatory elements. To identify whether this change in the H3K27ac chromatin state had a corresponding change in target gene expression, we analyzed the expression change in their target genes mapped by their genomic proximity to the H3K27ac peak (<10 kb). Notably, the targets of gained peaks in MED12 mutant cells had a significantly higher expression in these cells than in WT cells (Fig. 3f). Conversely, the gene targets of lost peaks in MED12 mutants dramatically reduced their expression in these cells (Fig. 3g). Although it is difficult to pinpoint the causality here, these findings indicated that MED12 mutations induced gene expression changes partly due to reprogrammed epigenome, at least of the H3K27ac chromatin states.
MED12 mutations lead to enhanced expression of collagen genes in 3D culture conditions
Fibroid tumors are known to have an aberrantly remodeled extracellular matrix and significantly higher production of collagen27,37,42. Recent transcriptome and epigenome profiling by Moyo et al. also highlighted substantially higher expression of collagen genes in fibroid tumors36. Surprisingly, we did not find higher expression of collagen genes in our 2D cultured cells. We, therefore, wondered whether this is due to culture conditions. We thus obtained RNA-seq expression profiles of these cells cultured in 3D sphere conditions. Significantly, we found that culture conditions (2D vs. 3D) dramatically impacted gene expression programs. Indeed, >80% of all gene expression variations could be explained by culture conditions, whereas MED12 mutations induced gene expression alterations contributed to 12% of variations (Fig. 3h). More importantly, under 3D culture conditions, we observed significantly higher expression of collagen and ECM genes in both WT and mutant cells. However, mutant cells had significantly higher expression of the 45 collagen genes (Fig. 3i). Of the 20 that were expressed at higher levels in 3D conditions, and 15 had significantly higher expression in MED12 mutant cells (Fig. 3i), as exemplified in the RNA-Seq tracks for COL5A3 gene loci (Fig. 3j). Notably, we observed significant number of differentially upregulated or downregulated genes that are common between the engineered MED12 Gly-44 mutant cells vs. primary fibroids, regardless of culture conditions (Supplementary Fig. 7a, b). Interestingly, we observed substantially higher number of commonly downregulated genes (>2.5-fold increase in Obs vs. Exp) between 3D culture conditions and primary fibroids, indicating the impact of MED12 mutations is further enhanced in 3D conditions.
The MED12 Gly-44 mutation alters DNA synthesis and renders cells sensitive to DNA-damaging agents
The above data and cell proliferation rates suggested that MED12 Gly-44 mutation leads to abnormal cell cycle, DNA replication, and repair. We, therefore, tested whether MED12 mutant cells have aberrant cell cycles by analyzing the 5-ethynyl-2′-deoxyuridine (EdU) incorporation and DNA content levels. Notably, the MED12 mutant cells have a significantly higher percentage of cells in the S-phase (p < 0.035), indicating an abnormal rate of DNA synthesis and progression of the DNA replication fork (Fig. 4a and Supplementary Fig. 8). These findings support a recent report that MED12 mutant UFs samples have increased replication stress due to abnormal progression of the replication fork and increased R-loop formation43. Notably, if unresolved, abnormal progression or stalling of replication may lead to structural genomic alterations or excessive DNA damage through replication fork collapse44,45. Indeed, complex chromosomal rearrangements are frequently observed in uterine fibroids5,46, and MED12 mutations have been associated with structural genomic variations and genomic instability in mice32.
The above findings led us to test whether the mutant cells have increased DNA damage at the basal level and are differentially sensitive to DNA-damaging agents such as Carboplatin. To this end, we measured γH2AX, a phosphorylated form of histone H2AX that is deposited at the DNA double-strand break site and can be sued as a proxy for DNA damage/repair activity. Notably, in line with recent findings43, we did not see a significant increase in total γH2AX at the basal level by western blot (Fig. 4b). However, the immunofluorescence staining shows a detectable difference between overall γH2AX signal intensity, indicating a potential DNA damage/repair activity difference between these two cells (Fig. 4c). Interestingly, we saw significantly more DNA damage accumulation in MED12 mutant cells in response to Carboplatin in both MED12 mutant cell lines by western blot and IF (Fig. 4c and Supplementary Fig. 9). The MED12 mutant Fibroid tumors are known to have higher abnormal progression of the replication fork and increased R-loop formation43. Therefore, we tested whether primary fibroid tumors have higher DNA damage/repair activity than normal myometrium. We performed an immunohistochemistry analysis of γH2AX on a well-annotated tissue microarray containing normal myometrium and MED12 mutant fibroid tumors (n = 10). To quantify levels if γH2AX in a robust and unbiased way, we trained a machine learning algorithm to assess γH2AX levels at a single cell level (methods). MED12 mutant fibroid tumors have detectable and substantially higher overall γH2AX levels, indicating higher DNA damage and repair activity than normal myometrium (Fig. 4d, e and Supplementary Fig. 10). Notably, the γH2AX levels within the same fibroid tumors across smooth muscle cells vs. the stromal cells were comparable (Fig. 4f).
The above findings led us to investigate whether the MED12 mutant cells that display higher activity of the DNA repair gene, potentially due to a basal level DNA damage, would be selectively more vulnerable to additional DNA damage. We, therefore, performed long-term live-cell imaging to assess relative apoptosis rates (Caspase 3/7 staining, Biotum) over four days. We observed significant apoptotic cell death selectively in MED12 mutant cells compared to WT cells (Fig. 4g), indicating a potential therapeutically exploitable vulnerability in these mutant cells.
The MED12 Gly-44 mutations alter genome-wide 3D chromatin organization and genome compartmentalization
The mediator complex is a critical determinant of the overall gene expression program8–11. It has also been suggested to play a critical role in genome organization by bridging the regulatory elements (enhancers) with gene promoters and facilitating the RNA polymerase II transcriptional initiation11,12. We, therefore, studied whether the abnormal transcriptional program downstream of MED12 mutations is due to altered 3D genome organization. Depending on the organization scales, the nuclear genome can be categorized into at least three layers in 3D space47,48. Globally, the chromosomal DNA is organized into two distinct compartments: A and B. The A compartment is generally associated with gene transcription and active histone modification marks such as H3K27ac and H3K4me3, while the B compartment mainly comprises heterochromatin. At a finer scale (usually ~ hundreds of Kb in size), the mammalian genome is organized as topologically associated domains (TAD), whose boundary can prevent erroneous interactions between the enhancer and wrong target genes. At the finest scale, when a Hi-C library is sequenced deep enough, the chromatin loops that reveal high-resolution promoter-enhancer interactions can be identified. Each layer of genome organization has been linked with proper gene regulation and human diseases47–50. To study how MED12 Gly-44 mutation alters the 3D genome organization, we employed high-resolution Hi-C technology and obtained 804,255,654 chromatin contact pairs in WT and 717,644,659 contact pairs in MED12 mutant cells (Supplementary Fig. 11a).
We observed a striking difference in Hi-C maps between WT and mutant cells. Compared with WT cells, the MED12 mutant cell Hi-C map showed much more pronounced plaided or checkboard patterns (Fig. 5a), suggesting the global change in interactions involved with the A/B compartment. We observed significant changes in the compartment state annotations between the two cell types, as exemplified by the eigenvectors track above the Hi-C maps (Fig. 5a). Globally, we found that 7.04% of B compartments switched to A compartment, while 9.45% of B compartments switched to A compartment (Fig. 5b). Integrating gene expression data with 3D genome organization shows that these changes in genomic compartments alter gene expression activity. More specifically, the genes in the compartments that switched from inactive B to active A compartments were significantly upregulated. In contrast, the genes in the A-to-B switching regions were downregulated (Fig. 5c). For example, the ABCB5 gene, which was in the B compartment and silenced in WT cells, was in a B-to-A compartment region and highly expressed in MED12 mutant cells (Fig. 5d).
In addition to the compartmentalization switch, we observed enhanced 3D chromatin interactions between the compartments of the same types but reduced inter-compartment interactions. As demonstrated in global average contact frequencies across all compartments in the genome (Fig. 5e), MED12 mutant cells have significantly higher intra-compartments (A-to-A or B-to-B) interaction frequencies (Fig. 5f). Interestingly, the global compartment strength is primarily driven by enhanced A-to-A interactions and reduced A-to-B interactions, as B-to-B compartment interactions are comparable in WT and mutant cells (Fig. 5f). Finally, we identified 23,487 chromatin loops in WT cells and a comparable number of 23,261 loops in MED12 mutant cells, using a machine-learning software that we recently developed51. Of these, ~20,000 loops were common, and ~3000 were cell-type-specific chromatin loops (Supplementary Fig. 11b, c). These findings indicate that the differential gene expression changes downstream of MED12 mutation are partly due to altered 3D genome organization.
Interestingly, a recent report suggested that the MED12/CDK module of the mediator complex controls the global gene expression program, in part, by limiting the formation of dense heterochromatin domains and 3D chromatin compartmentalization15. Specifically, Haarhuis et al. observed that MED12 loss enhances H3K9me3-marked heterochromatin domain formations and genome compartmentalization15. Notably, the enhanced genome compartmentalization we observe in MED12 Gly-44 mutant cells resembles the findings from MED12-depleted cells. However, while the loss of MED12 resulted in increased heterochromatin domains and reduced the “open” chromatin regions marked with H3K4me15, our results show that MED12 Gly-44 mutations resulted in significantly higher open chromatin regions (marked by H3K27ac, Fig. 3e). Furthermore, we find distinct gene expression changes due to MED12 Gly-44 mutation vs. a loss of MED12 (Supplementary Fig. 5). These findings indicate that although Hi-C chromatin compartmentalization in MED12 Gly-44 mutant cells and MED12 KO cells have some resemblance, MED12 Gly44 mutations result in aberrant expression of a distinct set of genes and altered chromatin accessibility compared to WT or MED12 depleted cells.
Discussion
Recurrent somatic MED12 mutations drive fibroid tumors in 70% of cases. Unfortunately, the MED12 mutant cells from these lesions could not be isolated and maintained in culture conditions52,53. This formidable challenge limited the ability to create a tractable genetic model system to deeply characterize metabolomics and genomics of pure populations of MED12 mutant cells. In this study, we utilized CRISPR genome engineering to introduce fibroid-relevant recurrent MED12 mutation at the endogenous MED12 locus. We generated multiple clonal populations of MED12 mutant cells that recapitulate in vitro and in vivo features of UFs.
Notably, more than 50% of all recurrent MED12 exon two mutations are mutating the Glycine aa at the 44th codon into at least six others (aa), indicating that altering Gly at this position results in significant structural and functional alterations in MED12. Interestingly, Gly is the smallest and the only aa that contains Hydrogen as its side chain, whereas all other amino acids contain Carbon54. As such, Gly may have a critical impact on both structure and function of the protein because the sidechain-less form of Glycine provides conformational flexibility and can also bind to phosphate, e.g., ATP, in the case of kinase pockets54. Our findings also support the clinical4,55,56 and mouse genetic32 data that the recurrent MED12 Gly-44 mutations are gain of function and “oncogene” in UFs tumorigenesis26. However, the exact mechanism of how these genetic alterations drive UFs pathogenesis is poorly understood. Notably, cell sorting analysis of UFs indicates a presence of a stem-like population that harbors MED12 mutations and can drive in vivo growth of leiomyoma xenograft tumors57,58. The organoid models could be generated from the stem-like cells that are positive for Stro-1/CD44 markers59. Hence, it is plausible to hypothesize that the initial MED12 mutation occurs in these stem and progenitor cells, which subsequently interact with the surrounding myometrial tissue to give rise to a fibroid tumor. Notably, in this study, we introduced the MED12 mutation in a terminally differentiated myometrial smooth muscle cell line. Despite that, we observed remarkable disease-relevant cellular and molecular features, indicating the robustness of the MED12 Gly-44 mutation in transforming the cells.
At the biochemical level, a series of elegant experiments indicated that recurrent MED12 mutations alter mediator complex activity. Specifically, through mass spectrometry analysis in insect cells overexpressing UFs-linked MED12 mutations, Turunen et al. show that MED12 mutations disrupt mediator-associated CDK activity20. For example, the same group demonstrated that Gly-44 mutant MED12 disrupts allosteric activation of cyclin C-CDK8/19 complex19. Notably, the fact that UF-associated genetic alterations in MED12 are not loss function mutations that cause protein loss but a recurrent mutation that frequently changes the same (Gly-44) amino acid suggests that this mutation may not function as a “loss” of function. Supporting this, we observe that the altered gene expression program in MED12 Gly-44 mutant cells differs from the MED12 knock-out cells. These findings suggest that the MED12 Gly-44 mutations in UFs are not simple “loss of function” in MED12.
Our findings also shed some light on MED12 mutant cells that could not be previously generated. Supporting previous findings52,53, we observe that the MED12 mutant cells have lower fitness in 2D culture conditions; however, in 3D sphere conditions, the mutant cells formed larger spheres. Notable, the mutant cells have been cultured in 2D conditions for months period, therefore, it remains to be seen whether these cells will eventually adopt the 2D conditions and gain better fitness in the long run. Significantly, in 3D, we observed enhanced proliferation and expression of collagen genes as seen in primary fibroid tumors2,27,32. Our in vivo results from the xenograft kidney capsule model further corroborated these findings and showed that MED12 mutant cells have higher proliferative capacity and ECM and collagen deposition levels. The results from co-culture and condition experiments suggest that the MED12 mutant cells have elevated fitness in 3D conditions, and they enhance the proliferation/survival capacity of neighboring non-mutant cells as well. The molecular mechanisms downstream of MED12 mutations that underlie this increased fitness are yet to be identified. One prominent mechanism is the increased expression of collagen genes that remodels the ECM. This, together with the growth factors released in the environment, results in autocrine and paracrine signaling that improves the overall fitness of mutant and non-mutant cells.
Notably, our findings also indicate a potential therapeutically exploitable vulnerability in the mutant cells as these cells are significantly more sensitive to a chemotherapeutic agent, Carboplatin. Our detailed metabolomics and transcriptomics analysis show that the engineered MED12 mutation results in robust metabolic and gene expression changes highly reminiscent of primary fibroid tissues. Therefore, our model system may be a valuable asset for the larger research community to study and target UFs-relevant MED12 mutations. Importantly, in addition to being mutated in >70% of UFs4, MED12 exon two mutations are also observed in breast fibroadenomas and phyllodes tumors (59%)60,61, uterine leiomyosarcomas (7–30%)62, chronic lymphocytic leukemias (5%)63, and colorectal cancers (0.5%)62. Therefore, it is plausible to speculate that the mutant MED12 in these diseases also results in similarly altered metabolomics, 3D chromatin compartmentalization, and therapeutic vulnerabilities. To this end, the genome-engineered strategy we present here could be explored to introduce similar mutations in other cellular models and comparatively study the outcomes to assess whether the same MED12 mutations result in similar molecular and cellular phenotypes in these different cell types.
Our study has some limitations. Firstly, we engineered one of the several MED12 exon two mutations, and whether other recurrent hot spot mutations result in the same phenotype is yet to be determined. Secondly, we introduced the MED12 Gly-44 mutation in an immortalized myometrial smooth muscle cell line. Although this model retains specific markers of smooth muscle/myometrium cell markers observed in primary cultures of SMC30; cell lines are generally a poor model that cannot capture the heterogeneous nature of complex tissues. To this end, combining precise CRISPR engineering with UF-organoid models59 should further advance our understanding of MED12 mutations and identify MED12-mutation-specific therapeutically exploitable vulnerabilities.
Methods
Ethical statement
This research complies with all relevant ethical regulations including human cell line and animal studies. The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Northwestern University. In vivo experimental procedures were approved by Northwestern University’s Animal Care and Use Committee approved all procedures involving animals in this study protocol #IS00012470)and were performed according to respective institutional regulations.
Cell lines and culture conditions
The human myometrial smooth muscle cell line myo-hTERT Cells were kindly provided by Dr. Jian-Jun Wei (Northwestern University) and are described by Carney et al.64. The cell line is listed in the Cellosaurus database under the accession number CVCL_9Z20. These cells and HUtSMC (ATCC, PCS-460-011) were maintained in DMEM/F-12 (Gibco, Invitrogen 11320033) with 10% Fetal Bovine Serum (Fisher scientific, SH3091003) and 1% Penicillin–streptomycin (Life Technologies,15140–122). Cells were cultured and incubated at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 and 95% air.
MED12(G44N) CRISPR knock-in and nucleofection
MED12-Gly-44 targeted sgRNA oligos sequences (Supplementary Data 4), were designed using CRISPOR software65 selecting the lenti-guide-puro protocol and were ordered from IDT. 10 µM from each oligonucleotide pair were mixed using annealing buffer (10 mM Tris, pH=8, 50 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA) in a total volume of 50 µl and incubated at 95 °C for 5 min. Then, they were allowed to slowly cool down to RT. Next, annealed oligos were diluted (1:200) using sterile water. The ligation reaction was performed using BsmB1-digested 50 ng backbone (Modified P2A_mCherry CROPseq-Guide-puro (# 86708, Addgene), 1 µl of the diluted oligos, and 1XT4 DNA ligase and incubated overnight at 16 °C. The next day, 2.5 µl of the ligation reaction was transformed into NEB Stable competent E.coli (C3040H, NEB) and incubated overnight in the presence of ampicillin selection. Next, several colonies were picked and grown overnight. The next day, plasmid DNA was isolated using a Qiaprep spin miniprep kit (27206, Qiagen) and sent to Sanger sequencing for validation of successful insertion. Modified GFP-hCas9 (Plasmid 41815, Addgene) and ssDNA-HDR template (IDT) (Supplementary Data 4) were used as well for nucleofection.
In all, 4 × 105 hTERT cells were nucleofected with MED12-sgRNA (1.5 µg), Cas9-GFP (1.5 µg) and single strand HDR template (50pmol) using Neon transfection system (Invitrogen, MPK5000) and Neon 10 µl kit (Thermo Fisher, MPK1025). The parameters used for nucleofection were 1400 Voltage/ 20 with/ 2 pulse. 48 hr later, double positive (mcherry+GFP) cells were selected using FACS and seeded as single cells in 96-well plates.
Single-cell colony qPCR scanning and validation
Single-cell colonies were split into replicate plates after the colonies grew. One of the replicate plates was washed with PBS twice, Tris-HCL (pH 8.5) was added, and the cells were scraped off with pipette tips. Then, cells were transferred to qPCR plates (4306737, Applied biosystem). Cells were incubated at 95 °C/15 min for lysis, then cooled on ice for 1 min. Then they were treated with Proteinase K (55 °C/30 min) (EO0492, Thermo Fisher) and incubated at 95 °C/10 min for proteinase inactivation. After this, they were transferred to new qPCR plates, and the same amount of lysis was used per reaction (reactions were performed as duplicates). qPCR was performed using Fast SYBR™ Green Master Mix (4385616, Thermo Fisher) and the same reverse primer, with two different forward primers WT/Mut (Supplementary Data 4) to detect positive colonies.
After detecting mutation-positive colonies, the gDNA was extracted from the replicate plates using the Purelink genomic DNA mini kit (K182002, Thermo Fisher), and RNA was extracted using the Zymo research Quick RNA miniprep kit(R1054). Isolated RNA was converted to cDNA (4387406, Applied biosystem). The MED12-exon2 region was amplified using primers F/R (Supplementary Data 4) from gDNA or using F/R primers from cDNA (Supplementary Data 4), then sent for Sanger sequencing for mutation validation.
CRISPR TIDER analysis
After sorting for double positive (mCherry+GFP) cells, half of the cells were seeded as a population separately from single-cell colonies. These cells were then used to detect population-level CRISPR knock-in rate using CRISPR-TIDER66 analysis. They were subsequently passaged over 9 weeks to determine if MED12 mutation abundance changed in the population over time. Also, mutant positive colonies were analyzed using CRISPR-TIDER to differentiate homozygous/heterozygous mutation. For TIDER, three PCR amplicons were produced following the website’s protocol (http://shinyapps.datacurators.nl/tider/). Control and sample PCR amplicons were produced using F/R primers on genomic DNA. Reference PCR amplicons were produced using two overlapping primers and the same set of F/R primers for the control and sample PCRs described by the website’s protocol (Supplementary Data 4).
Then, sanger sequencing results (ACGT/NU core) (.ab1 files) were uploaded using the default settings on the website.
Western blotting
Cells were lysed using 1X RIPA buffer, and protein concentrations were determined using the BCA assay (23225, Thermo Fisher). 1 µg/µl protein was mixed with 4X sample buffer with reducing agent and boiled at 95 °C for 10 min. Next, 20 µg of boiled protein was loaded onto either a NuPAGE 4–12%, Bis-Tris gradient gel (# NP0335, Thermo Fisher) or 3–8%, Tris-acetate gel (EA0375, Thermo Fisher), and samples were run at 130 V for about 1.5 h. Proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose membrane using iBlot dry transfer system (Program 3/8 min). Next, membranes were blocked using 5% milk dissolved in TBS-T (20 mM Tris, 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% Tween 20; pH 7.6) for 1 h, rocking at room temperature (RT). After blocking, membranes were incubated with primary antibodies (1:1000 dilution) MED12 (Bethyl lab, #A300-774A), TDO2 (Protein-tech,15880-1AP), Phospho-Histone H2A.X (Ser139) (Cell Signaling, 2577), Anti-β-Actin antibody- clone AC-15, monoclonal (Sigma, Mouse monoclonal, A1978-100µl) prepared in blocking buffer overnight at 4 °C. The next day, membranes were washed with TBS-T 3 times for 5 min. Then, they were incubated with secondary antibodies (1:10,000) (Anti-Rabbit IgG (H + L) (Promega, W4011), Anti-Mouse IgG (H + L) (Promega, W402B) diluted in blocking buffer for 1 h at RT. After the incubation, membranes were again washed 3 times for 10 min. Lastly, membranes were covered with western blot detection reagents (37074, Thermo Fisher) and visualized using the iBright imaging system.
RNA seq and differential expression/GSEA analysis
Total RNA was isolated using the Zymo research Quick RNA miniprep kit utilizing the on-column DNAse treatment according to the manufacturer’s instructions (R1054). The overall RNA purity was assessed by absorbance at 260 and 280 and the potential degradation was assessed by running on the agarose gel. Samples with (A260/A280 ratio ~2 and 28S and 18S band intensity ratio greater than 2 were accepted as pure and non-degraded and processed for qPCR and RNA-Seq analysis. RNA was prepared for sequencing using the NEBNext® Poly(A) mRNA Magnetic Isolation Module (NEBNext, E7490) and NEBNext® Ultra™ Directional RNA Library Prep Kit (NEBNext, E7420) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Paired-end sequencing of all RNA libraries was performed on the Illumina NextSeq 500 Platform.
The quality of FastQ files of RNA seq was checked using FastQC (www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk). RNA-seq reads were aligned to the GRCh38 human genome assembly (Ensembl release 102) using the STAR aligner (v2.7.5)67 with default settings. BAM files were converted into bigwig files using bam coverage/DeepTools (v3.5.1)68 (bin size 1, normalized BPM). Gene exon counts were found using featureCounts (Subread package, v1.6.1, settings: -g gene_id -t exon -p -s 2)69. Differential expression analysis was performed using the R package DESeq2 (v1.36.0)70, and the Wald test was used for significance (p value). The Independent hypothesis weighting (IHW) method was applied for multiple testing corrections, with the false discovery rate controlled for at (p < 0.05). Differentially expressed genes in the MED12(G44N) cells (p-adj<0.01) and DE genes in Leiomyoma cells (p-adj<0.01) were used for GO term analysis which was performed using the NIH’s DAVID Bioinformatics Resource71 (Supplementary Fig. 6). DESeq2 normalized exon counts were used in GSEA (v4.0.2)72 analysis in default settings.
All leiomyoma and myometrium RNA-seq data were downloaded from the NCBI-GEO data repository via accession GSE128242 and original publication data processing steps were followed36. Heatmaps of differentially expressed genes were plotted in R (cran.r-project.org) using pheatmap73.
Incucyte live cell imaging
Incucyte Live cell imaging system (Sartorius) was used for tracking cell proliferation. The system took a photo of cell plates every 2 h in different image channels (Phase/Green or Red). For cell nucleus counting, 1 µM SiR-DNA nuclear dye was used (Cytoskeleton, SC007) and captured using the red channel. At the end of the experiment, proliferation data were analyzed using the Incucyte analysis tool and p-values were calculated using the Incucyte raw data. Relative proliferation was normalized to the starting time.
EdU staining
Cells (4 × 105) were seeded in six-well plates one day before Edu staining. Then, cells were treated with 10 µM EdU for 90 min following the manufacturer’s protocol (Click-iT™ Plus EdU Alexa Fluor™ 488 Flow Cytometry Assay Kit, Thermo Fisher, C10632). Next, cells were stained for DNA content using FxCycle™ Violet Stain (Thermo Fisher, F10347) (1 µl violet for 1 ml media). Lastly, cells were analyzed using flow cytometry, and the results were analyzed using FlowJo.
H3K27Ac CUT&Tag and analysis
Benchtop CUT&Tag41 V.2 protocol was slightly modified to profile genome-wide H3K27ac. Briefly, Concanavalin A-coated (ConA) beads (10 µl/sample) were washed using binding buffer (100 µl/sample) twice and kept on ice until the cells were ready. Cells were then harvested and counted to obtain 100,000 cells for each sample. Then, cells were centrifuged and washed one-time using a wash buffer. After washing, cells were centrifuged and resuspended in wash buffer (100 µl/sample). Next, ConA beads were added to each sample while vortexing gently. The bead-sample mixture was rotated for 10 min at RT. Next, samples were put on a magnet stand to clear the liquid. Following this, samples were resuspended in ice-cold antibody buffer (50 µl/reaction) while vortexing and then kept on ice. Afterward, 3 µl H3K27ac antibody (ab4729, Abcam) was added to each sample while vortexing gently. Samples were incubated overnight at 4 °C on a nutator. The next day, samples were cleared using a magnet stand. A secondary antibody (ABIN101961) mixture (2 µl antibody diluted in 100 µl dig-wash buffer for each sample) was added to each sample while vortexing. After 1 h of incubation at RT on a nutator, samples were cleared and washed twice using Dig-wash buffer (1 ml/sample). Then, the pA-Tn5 adapter complex (2.5 µl pA-Tn5 in 47.5 µl Dig-300 buffer) was added to each sample while vortexing and samples were incubated for 1.5 h at RT on a nutator. Here, we used pAG-Tn5 from EpiCypher (Cat No: 15–1117). After the incubation, samples were cleared and washed twice using Dig-300 buffer (1 ml/sample). Next, 300 µl tagmentatiton buffer was added to each sample, and they were incubated for 1.5 h at 37 °C. To stop tagmentatiton, 10 µl 0.5 M EDTA, 3 µl 10%SDS, and 2.5 µl 20 mg/ml Proteinase K was added to each sample. After adding Proteinase K, samples were vortexed immediately and incubated overnight at 37 °C. The following day, samples were incubated at 50 °C for 30 min. To isolate DNA, 300 µl phenol-chloroform was added to samples and mixed by vortexing. Each mixture was transferred into a phase-lock tube (129046, Qiagen) and centrifuged at 16,000 × g for 3 min at RT. Next, 300 µl chloroform was added to each sample and inverted 10 times to mix. Samples were then centrifuged at 16,000 × g for 3 min at RT. After centrifugation, the aqueous layer was transferred to new tubes containing 750 µl 100% ethanol and mixed well with pipetting. Samples were incubated on ice for 5 min and centrifuged for 15 min at 4 °C 16,000 × g. The liquid was removed (the pellet may not be visible), and 1 ml of 100% ethanol was added to rinse the pellet. Then, samples were centrifuged for 1 min at 4 °C 16,000 × g. The liquid was carefully removed, and samples were air-dried for about 15 min. Next, the pellet was dissolved using 25 µl TE buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl pH 8, 1 mM EDTA supplemented with 1:400 diluted RNAse A). To remove potential RNA contaminants, samples were then incubated for 10 min at 37 °C. Library preparation was performed as described in Benchtop CUT&Tag V.2 protocol. The library was sequenced using NextSeq 500 (2 × 75 bp) to obtain 5 million reads per sample.
Reads were aligned to the hg38 reference genome using Bowtie274. Then, PCR duplicates and blacklisted regions were removed using Picard tools (“Picard Toolkit.” 2019; Broad Institute, GitHub Repository, https://broadinstitute.github.io/picard/) and bedtools, respectively. Bigwig files were generated using deepTools75 to visualize Cut&Tag tracks. Peak calling was performed using MACS276. To determine differentially acetylated regions, we used DiffBind (Stark R and Brown G (2011)/Bioconductor)77 package available on R studio.
Apoptosis assay
Cells were seeded into 96-well plates at a density of 1.5 × 103 cells/well. The following day, treatments were performed using 65 µM/75 µm Carboplatin (IC30/IC40 concentration, (Selleckchem, # S1215) mixed with 1:1000 diluted Caspase 3/7 dye (10403, Biotum). Then, cells were monitored using the Incucyte live cell imaging system using phase and green channels. The apoptosis rate was determined using the green integrated intensity/confluency values, and the results were plotted using the Incucyte cell imaging analysis.
Immunofluorescence staining
Approximately 1.5 × 105 cells were seeded onto coverslips in 6-well plates. The next day, cells were treated with the indicated concentrations of Carboplatin for three days. Then, cells were washed with PBS and fixed using 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 10 min at RT. After fixation, cells were washed three times with ice-cold PBS and incubated with 0.25% Triton X-100 in PBS for permeabilization. Next, cells were washed three times for 5 min with PBS and blocked using 1% BSA, 22.52 g/ml glycine in PBS-T (PBS + 0.1 Tween 20) for 1 h at RT. After blocking, cells were incubated with primary antibodies (Phospho-Histone H2A.X (Ser139) (1:1000) (Cell Signaling, # 2577) prepared with 1% BSA in PBS-T overnight at 4 °C in a humidified chamber. The next day, cells were washed three times for 5 min with PBS-T, and then they were incubated with a secondary antibody (Alexa Fluor 594, Invitrogen #A-11012) prepared in 1% BSA in PBS-T for 1 h at RT. Afterward, cells were washed three times for 5 min using PBS-T. Next, coverslips were mounted onto microscopy slides using a mounting medium with DAPI (S36939, Thermo Fisher). Finally, slides were visualized using the EVOS cell imaging system, and the images were analyzed using ImageJ software. Relative γH2AX levels were drawn, and the p-value (Two-sided unpaired t-test) was calculated in Prism-GraphPad (9.4.1).
Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) and analysis
Cells were seeded on 10 cm plates and the medium was completely aspirated once they reached ~70–80% confluence. Then, cells were rinsed with ice-cold PBS twice and added 1 ml 80% (vol/vol) methanol (cooled −80 °C). Then, cells were scraped on ice with a cell scraper and collected lysate in a conical tube. The lysate was incubated at −80 °C for 5 min and vortexed at room temperature for 1 min. Repeat that step two times. Then, the lysate was incubated at −80 °C overnight for protein precipitation. The next day, they were centrifuged at 20,000 × g for 15 min at 4 °C and transferred the supernatant that contained metabolites to a new 1.5 ml conical tube. Then, the pellet was fully dissolved in 8 M urea buffer, and protein concentrations were determined using a BCA assay (Thermo Fisher, #23225). The same amount of metabolomes based on protein amount were submitted for LC-MS. The metabolome was analyzed in the NU metabolomics core facility. Then, all metabolome peak areas of samples were normalized to their TIC (total ion count) and normalized peak area per metabolite results were analyzed on Metaboanalyst 5.078 (https://www.metaboanalyst.ca/).
High-throughput chromosome conformation capture (Hi-C) and data processing
The Hi-C was performed using the Arima-HiC Kit (A510008, Arima Genomics) as instructed by the manufacturer. Approximate 1 million WT/Mut cells were harvested, counted, and fixed with 1% formaldehyde and quenched with 0.125 M glycine at room temperature. The fixed cells were digested with the restriction enzyme and end-labeled with Biotin-14-dATP, followed by proximity ligation. Then reverse-crosslinking was performed to the ligated samples and sheared into 300–500 bp fragments. The Biotin-labeled DNA fragments were then end-repaired following adapter ligation and PCR amplification. Hi-C libraries were generated using KAPA Library Quantification Kit (KAPA Biosystems) and quality-checked according to the manufacturer’s protocol.
The mapping, filtering, and binning of the data were done using the runHiC (v0.8.6) pipeline (10.5281/zenodo.55324). First, the adapters of the Hi-C FASTQ files were trimmed using Trim Galore (v0.4.5), and then runHiC aligned the trimmed FASTQ files to the hg38 human reference genome with Burrows–Wheeler Aligner. Then, low-quality reads and PCR duplicates were removed. Read pairs were then used to couple aligned reads, and redundant PCR artifacts and read pairs aligned to the same restriction fragments were filtered out before the next stage. The binning stage binned the reads at 5-kb, 10-kb, 50-kb, 1-Mb, 10-Mb, and 50-Mb resolution and performed the ICE normalization at the same time. After the binning state, ICE normalized matrices.mcool files were generated for downstream analyses.
High-throughput chromosome conformation capture (Hi-C) compartment analysis
The compartment analysis for WT/Mut HiC was performed using cooltools (DOI:10.1101/2022.10.31.514564). The A/B compartments PC1 values at 100-kb resolution were called using cooltools eigs-cis command. The scatter plot of PC1 values before and after the MED12 Gly-44 mutation was plotted using the ggplot2 package of R (v4.1.3). The regions with positive PC1 values were identified as compartments A. The regions with negative PC1 values were identified as compartments B. The compartment strength, AA interactions, BB interactions and AB interactions were calculated and visualized using boxplots with Wilcoxon signed-rank test for statistical analysis. The compartment strength was visualized using the saddle plot function implemented in cooltools.
3D spheroid formation and co-culture experiment
Cells were seeded (3000 cells per well) on Corning ultra-low attachment plate, 96 wells (# 4515), and spheroid photos were taken using the EVOS (Thermo Fisher Cat# AMF5000) cell imaging system. Then, spheroid volumes were calculated using ImageJ. Results were plotted using Prism software. For the co-culture spheroid experiment, WT, MED12(G44N) mutant, and MED12(KO) hTERT cells were transduced with lentivirus-included mCherry plasmid. For viral production, HEK293T cells were seeded into a 10 cm plate 1 day before transfection. 1 µg pMD2.G (Addgene, Plasmid # 12259), 2 µg psPAX2 (Addgene, Plasmid #12260) and 4 µg of the Modified P2A_mCherry CROP-seq-Guide-puro (# 86708, Addgene) plasmid were co-transfected into HEK293T cells using PEI. Media was refreshed 12 h after transfection. The virus was collected 24 and 48 h after the first media refreshment and filtered through a 0.45 mm filter. For viral transduction, cells were incubated with virus solution diluted in media and supplemented with 0.01 mg/ml polybrene for 24 h. After transduction, the mCherry-positive cells were sorted by flow cytometry.
For the co-culture spheroid experiment, the same number of HUtSMC (ATCC, #PCS-460-011) and mCherry positive hTERT cells (WT/Mut/KO) were seeded together in Corning ultra-low attachment plates (1500/1500 cells per well). After 4 days, spheroid photos were taken using the EVOS cell imaging system and spheroid volumes were calculated using ImageJ. Then, spheroids were collected, and the cells were dispersed using trypsin-EDTA (0.25%) (Gibco, # 25200056). Then the mCherry positive cell rate in the population was calculated using flow cytometry.
The analysis of tissue microarrays for MED12leiomyoma
Ten leiomyomas with MED12 mutations (G44) were selected. MED12 mutations were detected by Sanger sequencing and confirmed by RT-PCR. Matched myometrium was used for all leiomyoma cases. After histologic evaluation, tissue microarray (TMA) was prepared by a semiautomatic TMA instrument in paraffin-embedded tissues with 1.5 mm in diameter tissue core from regions of leiomyoma and matched myometrium. TMA was sectioned in 4 µm and subjected to hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and trichrome stains. The stained slides were reviewed by pathologist and then scanned by Hamamatsu scanner for digital image analysis.
The comparison of γH2AX staining ratios between the tissue microarray samples was carried out using Machine Learning. The samples were cropped with identical settings using QuPath Software79. The images were then segmented through the Trainable WEKA Segmentation80 plug-in of Fiji Software81. The γH2AX (Phospho-Histone H2A.X (Ser139) (20E3) Rabbit mAb (Cell signaling, # 9718) stained and γH2AX non-stained nucleus shapes were aligned to the plug-in. Thus, classified images were generated following the alignments. The colored pixel distribution of each classified image was obtained through the Image Color Summarizer and the pixel counts of green shapes (indicating unstained nuclei) and red shapes (indicating γH2AX stained nuclei) were compared.
To understand the γH2AX stained nuclei distribution between stromal and myometrial tissues within each sample, a semi-automated analysis was used. Following manual separation of the stromal and myometrial cell types, the nuclei were highlighted on different gradients according to their staining, through Photoshop’s Magic Wand tool. The highlighted particles were then evaluated using Fiji software, giving the unstained nucleus counts and γH2AX stained nucleus counts on different tissues of each sample.
H3K27Ac CUT & Tag analysis
Differential binding analysis was performed using the R package Diffbind (Stark R and Brown G (2011)/Bioconductor)77. Enriched and depleted peaks were chosen using a threshold of <0.1 FDR. Heatmaps were generated using Deeptools’75 computeMatrix and plotHeatmap functions. Peaks were annotated using the R package ChipSeeker82,83. Genes were determined to be peak-adjacent if the TSS or TES were within 10 kb of the peak center. RNA-counts were normalized with the R package DESeq270 using variance stabilizing transformation (VST). Violin plots of normalized RNA expression were generated using the R package ggplot2 (DOI:10.1007/978-0-387-98141-3) and p values were calculated using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests.
Mouse xenograft experiments
Northwestern University’s Animal Care and Use Committee approved all procedures involving animals in this study. Since the method involves hormone treatments, we use adult females at 9–10 weeks of age. 106 live cells (mutant MED12 and WT) were suspended into 10 µl rat-tail collagen (type I) solution (BD Bioscience, San Jose, CA) and cultured overnight as floating cultures. The next day, cell pellets were grafted underneath kidney capsules of ovariectomized adult female non-obese diabetic-SCID (IL2Rγ null) mice hosts (Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME) supplemented with subcutaneous implantation of 50 mg progesterone plus 50 µg estradiol 60-day slow-release pellets (Innovative Research of America Inc., Sarasota, Fl) as described previously84. After 8 weeks, the mice were sacrificed. The images of the regenerated tissues on the kidney surface were taken using a dissecting microscope connected to a computer with Leica Application Suite version 3.8 software (Leica Microsystems). The regenerated tissues were harvested, fixed in Davison, and paraffin-embedded. The H&E staining and Masons’ trichrome staining were performed by the Northwestern University Histology and Phenotyping Laboratory. The surface area results of the injected cells were obtained through the Freehand selection tool of the FIJI Software and by the Measure command. The surface areas were calculated on the same magnification and the same sections per each sample.
Masson’s Trichrome staining, staining intensity analysis
The intensity measurements were done by setting the sliced images on a saturation level containing only three channels, with the red color indicating the Trichrome staining. Then these classified images were analyzed on FIJI software by selecting the injected cells. Thus, the mean Red Intensity density from the designated areas was obtained.
Statistics and reproducibility
Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism version (9.4.1) Descriptive statistics are reported as means ± standard deviations (SDs). Between-group differences were assessed using Student’s t tests. (Hi-C) Compartment Analysis were assessed using two-sided Wilcoxon test, and p values were generated by log-rank test. Results were considered significant at p < 0.05. For in vitro experiments, no statistical method was used to predetermine sample size and no data were excluded from the analyses. For the in vivo experiment power analysis was performed to determine the sample size to achieve 80% power with 50% difference in lesion size. The mice were randomized in terms of injection of WT or mutant cell into left or right kidney capsule. The investigators were not blinded to allocation during experiments and outcome assessment.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
We thank all members of Adli lab for their critical insights and recommendations during this study, which was supported by a pilot project award (PI: Adli) from Northwestern Uterine Leiomyoma Research Center (P50HD098580, PI: Bulun). We thank Professor Debu Chakravarti for his critical suggestion on the manuscript.
Source data
Author contributions
M.A. conceptualized the study and wrote the manuscript. K.B. performed the majority of the experiments and performed the data analysis. X.C. performed the Hi-C data analysis. F.A., H.O., F.S.-P., A.J.D., and H.E. helped with experiments and data analysis. Y.F. and J.J.W. helped with the pathological classification and IHC of the TMA of fibroid tumors. F.Y., P.Y., and S.E.B. helped with the overall concepts and conclusions.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks Thomas Boyer, Aymara Mas, and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.
Data availability
All genomics data produced in this manuscript are available at Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) under the accession number: GSE226017. Source data are provided with this paper.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41467-023-39684-y.
References
- 1.Bulun SE. Uterine fibroids. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013;369:1344–1355. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1209993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Stewart EA. Clinical practice. Uterine fibroids. N. Engl. J. Med. 2015;372:1646–1655. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp1411029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Cardozo ER, et al. The estimated annual cost of uterine leiomyomata in the United States. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2012;206:211.e211–e219. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.12.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Makinen N, et al. MED12, the mediator complex subunit 12 gene, is mutated at high frequency in uterine leiomyomas. Science. 2011;334:252–255. doi: 10.1126/science.1208930. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Mehine M, et al. Characterization of uterine leiomyomas by whole-genome sequencing. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013;369:43–53. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1302736. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Berta DG, et al. Deficient H2A.Z deposition is associated with genesis of uterine leiomyoma. Nature. 2021;596:398–403. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03747-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Mehine M, et al. Integrated data analysis reveals uterine leiomyoma subtypes with distinct driver pathways and biomarkers. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2016;113:1315–1320. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1518752113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Soutourina J. Transcription regulation by the Mediator complex. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2018;19:262–274. doi: 10.1038/nrm.2017.115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Harper TM, Taatjes DJ. The complex structure and function of Mediator. J. Biol. Chem. 2018;293:13778–13785. doi: 10.1074/jbc.R117.794438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Belakavadi M, Fondell JD. Role of the mediator complex in nuclear hormone receptor signaling. Rev. Physiol. Biochem. Pharm. 2006;156:23–43. doi: 10.1007/s10254-005-0002-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Phillips-Cremins JE, et al. Architectural protein subclasses shape 3D organization of genomes during lineage commitment. Cell. 2013;153:1281–1295. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.04.053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kagey MH, et al. Mediator and cohesin connect gene expression and chromatin architecture. Nature. 2010;467:430–435. doi: 10.1038/nature09380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.El Khattabi L, et al. A pliable mediator acts as a functional rather than an architectural bridge between promoters and enhancers. Cell. 2019;178:1145–1158.e20. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.07.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Jaeger MG, et al. Selective Mediator dependence of cell-type-specifying transcription. Nat. Genet. 2020;52:719–727. doi: 10.1038/s41588-020-0635-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Haarhuis JHI, et al. A Mediator-cohesin axis controls heterochromatin domain formation. Nat. Commun. 2022;13:754. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-28377-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Tsai KL, et al. Mediator structure and rearrangements required for holoenzyme formation. Nature. 2017;544:196–201. doi: 10.1038/nature21393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Nozawa K, Schneider TR, Cramer P. Core Mediator structure at 3.4 A extends model of transcription initiation complex. Nature. 2017;545:248–251. doi: 10.1038/nature22328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Cevher MA, et al. Reconstitution of active human core Mediator complex reveals a critical role of the MED14 subunit. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2014;21:1028–1034. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2914. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Park MJ, et al. Oncogenic exon 2 mutations in Mediator subunit MED12 disrupt allosteric activation of cyclin C-CDK8/19. J. Biol. Chem. 2018;293:4870–4882. doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA118.001725. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Turunen M, et al. Uterine leiomyoma-linked MED12 mutations disrupt mediator-associated CDK activity. Cell Rep. 2014;7:654–660. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.03.047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Li, Y. C. et al. Structure and noncanonical Cdk8 activation mechanism within an Argonaute-containing Mediator kinase module. Sci. Adv.10.1126/sciadv.abd4484 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 22.Knuesel MT, Meyer KD, Donner AJ, Espinosa JM, Taatjes DJ. The human CDK8 subcomplex is a histone kinase that requires Med12 for activity and can function independently of mediator. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2009;29:650–661. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00993-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Zhou H, Kim S, Ishii S, Boyer TG. Mediator modulates Gli3-dependent Sonic hedgehog signaling. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2006;26:8667–8682. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00443-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kim S, Xu X, Hecht A, Boyer TG. Mediator is a transducer of Wnt/beta-catenin signaling. J. Biol. Chem. 2006;281:14066–14075. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M602696200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Mehine M, Makinen N, Heinonen HR, Aaltonen LA, Vahteristo P. Genomics of uterine leiomyomas: insights from high-throughput sequencing. Fertil. Steril. 2014;102:621–629. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.06.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Vogelstein B, et al. Cancer genome landscapes. Science. 2013;339:1546–1558. doi: 10.1126/science.1235122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Wu X, et al. Subtype-specific tumor-associated fibroblasts contribute to the pathogenesis of uterine leiomyoma. Cancer Res. 2017;77:6891–6901. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-1744. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Bloch J, Holzmann C, Koczan D, Helmke BM, Bullerdiek J. Factors affecting the loss of MED12-mutated leiomyoma cells during in vitro growth. Oncotarget. 2017;8:34762–34772. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.16711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Nadine Markowski D, et al. Cell cultures in uterine leiomyomas: rapid disappearance of cells carrying MED12 mutations. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2014;53:317–323. doi: 10.1002/gcc.22142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Condon J, et al. Telomerase immortalization of human myometrial cells. Biol. Reprod. 2002;67:506–514. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod67.2.506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Yang J, et al. Recurrent mutations at estrogen receptor binding sites alter chromatin topology and distal gene expression in breast cancer. Genome Biol. 2018;19:190. doi: 10.1186/s13059-018-1572-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Mittal P, et al. Med12 gain-of-function mutation causes leiomyomas and genomic instability. J. Clin. Investig. 2015;125:3280–3284. doi: 10.1172/JCI81534. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Leonard AK, et al. Methods for the visualization and analysis of extracellular matrix protein structure and degradation. Methods Cell Biol. 2018;143:79–95. doi: 10.1016/bs.mcb.2017.08.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Heinonen HR, et al. Global metabolomic profiling of uterine leiomyomas. Br. J. Cancer. 2017;117:1855–1864. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2017.361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Hutchinson AP, et al. Tryptophan 2,3-dioxygenase-2 in uterine leiomyoma: dysregulation by MED12 mutation status. Reprod. Sci. 2022;29:743–749. doi: 10.1007/s43032-022-00852-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Moyo MB, Parker JB, Chakravarti D. Altered chromatin landscape and enhancer engagement underlie transcriptional dysregulation in MED12 mutant uterine leiomyomas. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:1019. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-14701-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Jamaluddin MFB, Nahar P, Tanwar PS. Proteomic characterization of the extracellular matrix of human uterine fibroids. Endocrinology. 2018;159:2656–2669. doi: 10.1210/en.2018-00151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Rizzello A, et al. A proteomic analysis of human uterine myoma. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 2017;18:167–174. doi: 10.2174/1389203717666160322150603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Heintzman ND, et al. Histone modifications at human enhancers reflect global cell-type-specific gene expression. Nature. 2009;459:108–112. doi: 10.1038/nature07829. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Creyghton MP, et al. Histone H3K27ac separates active from poised enhancers and predicts developmental state. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2010;107:21931–21936. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1016071107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Kaya-Okur HS, et al. CUT&Tag for efficient epigenomic profiling of small samples and single cells. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:1930. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-09982-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Stewart EA, Friedman AJ, Peck K, Nowak RA. Relative overexpression of collagen type I and collagen type III messenger ribonucleic acids by uterine leiomyomas during the proliferative phase of the menstrual cycle. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1994;79:900–906. doi: 10.1210/jcem.79.3.8077380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Muralimanoharan S, et al. Aberrant R-loop-induced replication stress in MED12-mutant uterine fibroids. Sci. Rep. 2022;12:6169. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-10188-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Alexander JL, Orr-Weaver TL. Replication fork instability and the consequences of fork collisions from rereplication. Genes Dev. 2016;30:2241–2252. doi: 10.1101/gad.288142.116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Zeman MK, Cimprich KA. Causes and consequences of replication stress. Nat. Cell Biol. 2014;16:2–9. doi: 10.1038/ncb2897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Pendina AA, et al. Case of chromothripsis in a large solitary non-recurrent uterine leiomyoma. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2017;219:134–136. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.10.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Bonev B, Cavalli G. Organization and function of the 3D genome. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2016;17:661–678. doi: 10.1038/nrg.2016.112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Dekker J, Mirny L. The 3D genome as moderator of chromosomal communication. Cell. 2016;164:1110–1121. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.02.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Rao SS, et al. A 3D map of the human genome at kilobase resolution reveals principles of chromatin looping. Cell. 2014;159:1665–1680. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.11.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Schmitt AD, Hu M, Ren B. Genome-wide mapping and analysis of chromosome architecture. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2016;17:743–755. doi: 10.1038/nrm.2016.104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Salameh TJ, et al. A supervised learning framework for chromatin loop detection in genome-wide contact maps. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:3428. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-17239-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Zaitseva M, Vollenhoven BJ, Rogers PA. In vitro culture significantly alters gene expression profiles and reduces differences between myometrial and fibroid smooth muscle cells. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 2006;12:187–207. doi: 10.1093/molehr/gal018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Severino MF, et al. Rapid loss of oestrogen and progesterone receptors in human leiomyoma and myometrial explant cultures. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 1996;2:823–828. doi: 10.1093/molehr/2.11.823. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Ellington, A. & Cherry, J. M. Characteristics of amino acids. Curr. Protoc. Mol. Biol.10.1002/0471142727.mba01cs33 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 55.Kampjarvi K, et al. Mutations in Exon 1 highlight the role of MED12 in uterine leiomyomas. Hum. Mutat. 2014;35:1136–1141. doi: 10.1002/humu.22612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Clark AD, Oldenbroek M, Boyer TG. Mediator kinase module and human tumorigenesis. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2015;50:393–426. doi: 10.3109/10409238.2015.1064854. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Ono M, et al. Role of stem cells in human uterine leiomyoma growth. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e36935. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036935. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Mas A, et al. Stro-1/CD44 as putative human myometrial and fibroid stem cell markers. Fertil. Steril. 2015;104:225–234.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.04.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Banerjee S, et al. Human myometrial and uterine fibroid stem cell-derived organoids for intervening the pathophysiology of uterine fibroid. Reprod. Sci. 2022;29:2607–2619. doi: 10.1007/s43032-022-00960-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Tan J, et al. Genomic landscapes of breast fibroepithelial tumors. Nat. Genet. 2015;47:1341–1345. doi: 10.1038/ng.3409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Lim WK, et al. Exome sequencing identifies highly recurrent MED12 somatic mutations in breast fibroadenoma. Nat. Genet. 2014;46:877–880. doi: 10.1038/ng.3037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Kampjarvi K, et al. Somatic MED12 mutations in uterine leiomyosarcoma and colorectal cancer. Br. J. Cancer. 2012;107:1761–1765. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2012.428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Kampjarvi K, et al. Somatic MED12 mutations are associated with poor prognosis markers in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Oncotarget. 2015;6:1884–1888. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.2753. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Carney SA, et al. Immortalization of human uterine leiomyoma and myometrial cell lines after induction of telomerase activity: molecular and phenotypic characteristics. Lab. Investig. 2002;82:719–728. doi: 10.1097/01.LAB.0000017499.51216.3E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Concordet JP, Haeussler M. CRISPOR: intuitive guide selection for CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing experiments and screens. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46:W242–W245. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Brinkman EK, et al. Easy quantification of template-directed CRISPR/Cas9 editing. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46:e58. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Dobin A, et al. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics. 2013;29:15–21. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Ramirez F, et al. deepTools2: a next generation web server for deep-sequencing data analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:W160–W165. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Liao Y, Smyth GK, Shi W. featureCounts: an efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:923–930. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014;15:550. doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Sherman BT, et al. DAVID: a web server for functional enrichment analysis and functional annotation of gene lists (2021 update) Nucleic Acids Res. 2022;50:W216–W221. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkac194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Subramanian A, et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2005;102:15545–15550. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0506580102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Kolde, R. Pheatmap: pretty heatmaps. R Package Version1, 726 (2012).
- 74.Langmead B, Salzberg SL. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods. 2012;9:357–359. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Ramirez F, Dundar F, Diehl S, Gruning BA, Manke T. deepTools: a flexible platform for exploring deep-sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42:W187–W191. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Zhang Y, et al. Model-based analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS) Genome Biol. 2008;9:R137. doi: 10.1186/gb-2008-9-9-r137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Ross-Innes CS, et al. Differential oestrogen receptor binding is associated with clinical outcome in breast cancer. Nature. 2012;481:389–393. doi: 10.1038/nature10730. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Pang Z, et al. Using MetaboAnalyst 5.0 for LC-HRMS spectra processing, multi-omics integration and covariate adjustment of global metabolomics data. Nat. Protoc. 2022;17:1735–1761. doi: 10.1038/s41596-022-00710-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Bankhead P, et al. QuPath: Open source software for digital pathology image analysis. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:16878. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-17204-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Arganda-Carreras I, et al. Trainable Weka Segmentation: a machine learning tool for microscopy pixel classification. Bioinformatics. 2017;33:2424–2426. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Schindelin J, et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods. 2012;9:676–682. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Yu G, Wang LG, He QY. ChIPseeker: an R/Bioconductor package for ChIP peak annotation, comparison and visualization. Bioinformatics. 2015;31:2382–2383. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Wang Q, et al. Exploring epigenomic datasets by ChIPseeker. Curr. Protoc. 2022;2:e585. doi: 10.1002/cpz1.585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Ishikawa H, et al. Progesterone is essential for maintenance and growth of uterine leiomyoma. Endocrinology. 2010;151:2433–2442. doi: 10.1210/en.2009-1225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All genomics data produced in this manuscript are available at Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) under the accession number: GSE226017. Source data are provided with this paper.