In the published article, there was an error in the Legend for Tables 2 and 3. The Table legends should be corrected as follows:
Table 2.
Alpha diversity metrics with their estimated marginal means and their 95% confidence interval for each treatment group.
| Groups 1 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CT | WD | DSS | WD + DSS | |
| Proximal | ||||
| Chao1 | 533 (426–665)b | 500 (399–625)ab | 460 (360–588)ab | 367 (296–462)a |
| Shannon | 5.30 (5.0–5.66)b | 5.20 (4.92–5.57)b | 5.0 (4.63–5.30)ab | 4.80 (4.05–5.09)a |
| Faith PD | 35.4 (30.0–42.0)b | 35.5 (30.0–42.0)b | 29.4 (24.0–35.0)ab | 27.4 (23.0–32.0)a |
| Distal | ||||
| Chao1 | 535 (428–668)b | 555 (443–695)b | 397 (311–508)a | 397 (315–501)a |
| Shannon | 5.30 (4.94–5.59)b | 5.30 (4.96–5.63)b | 4.80 (4.46–5.12)a | 4.90 (4.59–5.21)ab |
| Faith PD | 36.4 (31.0–43.0)b | 38.6 (32.0–46.0)b | 26.9 (22.0–32.0)a | 28.5 (24.0–34.0)a |
| Feces | ||||
| Chao1 | 488 (387–615) | 534 (426–668) | 391 (301–506) | 434 (347–542) |
| Shannon | 5.20 (4.90–5.57) | 5.30 (4.95–5.62) | 5.0 (4.64–5.35) | 5.0 (4.71–5.33) |
| Faith PD | 34.3 (29–41)ab | 37.9 (32–45)b | 27.7 (23–34)a | 30.6 (26–36)ab |
1Treatment groups: control (CT; n = 17), WD (CT + ground beef; n = 18), CT + dextran sulfate sodium (DSS; n = 14), WD + dextran sulfate sodium (WD + DSS; n = 17). Pairwise comparison for differences in EMMS between groups was adjusted with BH and EMMs are superscripted with different letters at p < 0.05.
Table 3.
Test statistics of the dbRDA model for the effect of treatment and sample type on Bray–Curtis dissimilarity.
| Degree of freedom | % of variance explained | Sum of squares | Pseudo-F | P-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WD | 1.0 | 5.0 | 0.05 | 4.90 | 0.02 |
| DSS | 1.0 | 22.0 | 0.23 | 21.1 | < 0.01 |
| WD · DSS | 3.0 | 31.0 | 0.33 | 10.8 | < 0.01 |
| Sample type | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.12 | 0.55 | < 0.01 |
The values are averaged over three blocks.
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.