Skip to main content
JAMA Network logoLink to JAMA Network
. 2023 Jul 11;6(7):e2322839. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.22839

Association of Racial Discrimination With Adiposity in Children and Adolescents

Adolfo G Cuevas 1,2,✉, Danielle M Krobath 3,4, Brennan Rhodes-Bratton 2, Shu Xu 5, Jesulagbarami J Omolade 6, Aniyah R Perry 6, Natalie Slopen 7
PMCID: PMC10336613  PMID: 37432683

This cohort study assesses the association of self-reported experiences of racial discrimination with adiposity in a large sample of children and adolescents in the US.

Key Points

Question

Are self-reported experiences of racial discrimination associated with adiposity in a nationally representative sample of children and adolescents?

Findings

In this cohort study of 6463 participants, racial discrimination at baseline was associated with higher adiposity (body mass index and waist circumference) 1 year later in unadjusted and adjusted regression models.

Meaning

These findings suggest that personally mediated racial discrimination may be a risk factor for developing obesity in children and adolescents, above and beyond socioeconomic status.

Abstract

Importance

Childhood obesity is a major public health issue and is disproportionately prevalent among children from minority racial and ethnic groups. Personally mediated racism (commonly referred to as racial discrimination) is a known stressor that has been linked to higher body mass index (BMI; calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared) in adults, but little is known about the association of racial discrimination and childhood and adolescent adiposity.

Objective

To assess the prospective association between self-reported experiences of racial discrimination and adiposity (BMI and waist circumference) in a large sample of children and adolescents in the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cohort study used complete data from the ABCD study (2017 to 2019), involving a total of 6463 participants. The ABCD study recruited a diverse sample of youths from across the US, with rural, urban, and mountain regions. Data were analyzed from January 12 to May 17, 2023.

Exposure

The child-reported Perceived Discrimination Scale was used to quantify racial discrimination, reflecting participants’ perceptions of being treated unfairly by others or unaccepted by society based on their race or ethnicity.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Weight, height, and waist circumference were measured by trained research assistants. BMI z scores were computed by applying the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s age and sex-specific reference standards for children and adolescents. Waist circumference (inches) was quantified as the mean of 3 consecutive measures. Measurements were taken from time 1 (ie, 2017 to 2019) and time 2 (ie, 2018 to 2020).

Results

Of the 6463 respondents with complete data, 3090 (47.8%) were female, and the mean (SD) age was 9.95 (0.62) years. Greater racial discrimination exposure at time 1 was associated with higher BMI z score in both unadjusted (β, 0.05; 95% CI, 0.02-0.08) and adjusted regression models (β, 0.04; 95% CI, 0.01-0.08). Discrimination at time 1 was associated with higher waist circumference in unadjusted (β, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.15-0.54) and adjusted (β, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.04-0.44) models.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cohort study of children and adolescents, racial discrimination was positively associated with adiposity, quantified by BMI z score and waist circumference. Interventions to reduce exposure to racial discrimination in early life may help reduce the risk of excess weight gain across throughout life.

Introduction

Obesity in children and adolescents is a critical public health issue in the US. Nearly 1 in 5 US children and adolescents have obesity, as indicated by a body mass index (BMI, calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared) equal to or greater than the 95th percentile for their age and sex.1 This prevalence is greater than a 3-fold increase from the 5% prevalence in 1975.1,2 In addition, it is estimated that youth BMI trajectories have nearly doubled since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic among children aged 6 to 11 years, and children who had obesity prepandemic were the worst impacted.3 Childhood and adolescent obesity confer a wide range of short- and long-term health consequences, including hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, sleep apnea, depression, and early mortality.4,5 Importantly, obesity prevalence is not equal across racial or ethnic groups in childhood or adulthood. Black and Hispanic children and adolescents have a higher prevalence of obesity compared with their non-Hispanic White and Asian or Asian American counterparts, placing Black and Hispanic children at an increased risk for obesity-related chronic diseases.6,7 Despite extensive research on some factors contributing to the increasing prevalence of obesity and obesity disparities, including parent education, single-parent households, poverty, and neighborhood,8,9,10,11,12 our understanding of other potential risk factors remains insufficient. This knowledge gap limits the development of effective interventions to reduce obesity and address existing inequities.

Personally mediated racism—here, referred to as racial discrimination— includes discriminatory actions, attitudes, or prejudices exhibited by individuals toward others based on their perceived racial or ethnic background.13 Exposure to racial discrimination has been recognized as a social determinant of health and a driver of health inequities among children and adolescents.14,15,16 Taunting, harassment, and other types of indignities can have a similar impact on the body as other psychological stressors. They can induce negative emotional reactions and, in turn, stimulate biological and behavioral responses that increase the risk of disease.17,18,19 Growing research documents that exposure to discrimination is associated with a range of health outcomes, including depression, sleep difficulty, health-compromising behaviors, and high cortisol levels in children and adolescents.20,21 Despite this, the connection between discrimination and BMI is not well understood. In studies with adults, where there are more studies available, some find a positive association,22,23,24,25 whereas others find no association.26,27,28 Research on youth has mostly relied on nonrepresentative samples. A study on a community-based sample of 198 African American youths found a positive association between racial discrimination and BMI.29 Additionally, in a smaller sample of Australian children (N = 124), researchers found that higher levels of reported discrimination were associated with increased cardiometabolic risk factors, including higher BMI, waist circumference, blood pressure, and inflammation.19 However, it is crucial to investigate the connection between racial discrimination and BMI in a large population-based sample of US children to comprehend the influence of racial discrimination on obesity rates among US children and adolescents.

This cohort study aims to quantify the prospective association between racial discrimination and adiposity (BMI and waist circumference) in a large and racially diverse sample of 9-to-11-year-olds. We hypothesized that higher levels of racial discrimination at time 1 (ie, 2017 to 2019) would be associated with a higher BMI and higher waist circumference at time 2 (ie, 2018 to 2020).

Methods

This study used 2 waves of data from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study, which recruited a diverse sample of youths from 21 sites across the US, including rural, urban, and mountain regions. The study’s primary goal was to examine brain development and the association of various individual, social, and familial contextual variables on health, well-being, and health-related behaviors.30 To ensure adequate racial or ethnic representation, the ABCD investigators used probability sampling methods in both public and private elementary schools. The analysis primarily examined data from the year 1 wave (2017 to 2019) as the baseline, which encompassed the measurement of racial discrimination. The year 2 wave (2018 to 2020) was used as the follow-up period. The sample comprised approximately 11 200 youths, with 51.1% boys and 48.9% girls. Additionally, 45.2% of the sample consisted of children from minoritized racial and ethnic groups, including 19.2% Latino or Hispanic, 16.0% Black, and 5.5% Asian or Pacific Islander children. Detailed information regarding recruitment methods and sampling strategies is provided elsewhere.31 Institutional review board approval was obtained from the University of California, San Diego, and each of the 21 study sites.31 Written informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to data collection and analysis. The study followed the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) reporting guideline to ensure transparency and completeness in reporting of methods and results.

Measures

BMI

Trained research assistants measured weight and height. We calculated BMI using the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s age and sex-specific reference categories in children and adolescents, and calculated z scores.32

Waist Circumference

Trained research assistants measured waist circumference. We calculated waist circumference as the mean of 3 consecutive measures in inches.

Racial Discrimination

We used the Perceived Discrimination (PD) Scale to assess interpersonal racial discrimination (eAppendix in Supplement 1).33 The scale contains 3 items asking respondents about the frequency they were treated unfairly or negatively because of their ethnic background by peers, teachers, and other adults; and 4 items about their feeling unaccepted in society because of their race or ethnicity. The scale uses 5 frequency response codes (0 = almost never, 1 = seldom, 2 = sometimes, 3 = often, 4 = very often). Consistent with prior studies,33,34,35 the scores were averaged, with higher scores indicating greater reports of racial discrimination.

Covariates

To address potential confounding factors, we used a primary regression model that included variables known to have independent associations with both discrimination exposure and obesity, as demonstrated in previous studies20,36,37,38,39,40: child’s age (years), parent-reported biological sex (female and male), household income (less than $25 000, $25 000-$50 000, $50 000-$75 000, $75 000-$100 000, $100 000-$200 000, and greater than $200 000), parent education (high school diploma or less, some college, a Bachelor’s or Associate’s degree, and a graduate or professional degree), and nativity status (US-born and foreign-born). In addition, we incorporated the adiposity measures from year 1 into the model to strengthen the investigation of the association between discrimination and adiposity at time 2. Our study aims to provide a direct measurement of racial discrimination exposure, and as such, it is essential that our results are valid and free from bias.41,42,43,44 Including parent-reported race or ethnicity in the model would compromise this validity, as it introduces the potential for social experiences and biases to impact our results. Race or ethnicity, particularly parent-reported race or ethnicity, is a complex social construct that reflects a person’s experiences and exposure to social advantages and oppression.41,45 Including this construct in our model could introduce bias and potentially confound our results, particularly as it relates to the impact of racial discrimination on BMI.

Statistical Analysis

Descriptive analyses were performed to characterize the sample’s overall sociodemographic characteristics, racial discrimination exposure, and adiposity (BMI and waist circumference). Various correlation coefficients (Pearson, point-biserial, Spearman, Phi, and Rank biserial) were used to evaluate participant characteristic interrelations. Multiple linear regression models were used to quantify associations between racial discrimination and adiposity (BMI z score and waist circumference). A prospective analysis regressed time 2 BMI on time 1 reports of discrimination accounting for time 1 BMI. The same series of analyses were modeled using waist circumference as the primary independent variable. We tested the associations between racial discrimination and adiposity with and without adjusting for covariates. In this study, complete case analysis was used to address missing data in the multivariate models. This resulted in 5412 cases being omitted from the analysis due to the presence of missing values for any of the variables under examination. Statistical significance was set at P <.05, and all tests were 2-sided. All analyses were conducted from January 13 to May 17, 2023, using Stata SE version 17 (StataCorp).

Results

Descriptive Statistics

Of the 6463 respondents with complete data, 146 (2.3%) as Asian or Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, 679 (10.5%) identified as Black, 1173 (18.1%) as Hispanic or Latino of any race, 19 (0.3%) as Native American or American Indian, 3860 (59.7%) as White, 553 (8.6%) as multiracial, and 33 (0.5%) as other race, which includes all respondents who selected only the other race checkbox (Table 1). The sample included 3090 females (47.8%), and the mean (SD) age was 9.95 (0.62) years. Across the sample at time 1, 4015 (62.1%) of children were a healthy weight, while 458 (7.1%) were underweight, 1259 (19.5%) were overweight, and 731 (11.3%) had obesity. The mean (SD) overall racial discrimination score was 0.2 (0.4). Children with obesity reported the highest mean (SD) overall racial discrimination scores (0.21 [0.40]). Meanwhile, children with healthy weight reported a mean (SD) racial discrimination score of 0.15 (0.35). Most children (2104 [32.5%]) came from households with total incomes between $100 000 and $199 999. There was a significant difference in the prevalence of obesity according to household income categories. Obesity was most prevalent among children in the lowest income category (177 [24.1%]) and was least prevalent in the highest earning households (28 [3.6%]); χ2 = 355.16; P < .001). Children whose parents had a graduate degree had the lowest prevalence of obesity (106 [5.8%]) while those whose parents had a high school diploma or less had the highest obesity prevalence (22.4%; χ2 = 231.40; P < .001).

Table 1. Descriptive Statistics of the Adolescent Brain and Cognitive Development Study Sample, Overall and by Weight Category.

Characteristic Participants, No. (%) (N = 6463)
Overall T1 Underweight T1 Healthy weight T1 Overweight T1 Obesity P valuea
Participants 6463 458 (7.09) 4015 (62.12) 1259 (19.48) 731 (11.31) NA
T1 BMI z scoreb
Mean (SD) 0.42 (1.14) −1.88 (0.60) 0.04 (0.63) 1.46 (0.24) 2.20 (0.25) <.001
Median (IQR) 0.44 (−0.36 to 1.28) −1.71 (−2.09 to −1.44) 0.08 (−0.44 to 0.55) 1.45 (1.25 to 1.65) 2.16 (2.01 to 2.35) NA
T2 BMI z scoreb
Mean (SD) 0.44 (1.14) −1.47 (0.81) 0.07 (0.76) 1.39 (0.48) 2.09 (0.46) <.001
Median (IQR) 0.47 (−0.34 to 1.31) −1.49 (−1.88 to −1.02) 0.10 (−0.44 to 0.62) 1.44 (1.15 to 1.71) 2.13 (1.94 to 2.36) NA
T1 waist circumference, inb 27.64 (4.63) 23.26 (2.50) 25.74 (2.79) 30.45 (2.76) 35.88 (4.22) <.001
T2 waist circumference, inb 28.67 (4.91) 24.41 (2.34) 26.69 (2.85) 31.58 (3.42) 37.25 (4.89) <.001
Discrimination scoreb 0.16 (0.36) 0.12 (0.29) 0.15 (0.35) 0.19 (0.39) 0.21 (0.40) <.001
Median (IQR) 0 (0 to 0.14) 0 (0 to 0.14) 0 (0 to 0.14) 0 (0 to 0.28) 0 (0 to 0.28) NA
Age, yb 9.95 (0.62) 10.02 (0.63) 9.96 (0.62) 9.94 (0.62) 9.9 (0.62) .09
Parent-reported race or ethnicityc
American Indian or Alaska Native 19 (0.29) 0 8 (42.11) 7 (36.84) 4 (21.05) <.001
Asian, Native Hawaiian, or Pacific Islander 146 (2.26) 15 (10.27) 95 (65.07) 23 (15.75) 13 (8.90) <.001
Black 679 (10.51) 23 (3.39) 335 (49.34) 156 (22.97) 165 (24.3) <.001
Hispanic to any race(s) 1173 (18.15) 50 (4.26) 579 (49.36) 331 (28.22) 213 (18.16) <.001
Multiracial, Non-Hispanic 553 (8.56) 47 (8.50) 333 (60.22) 102 (18.44) 71 (12.84) <.001
White 3860 (59.72) 321 (8.32) 2645 (68.52) 636 (16.48) 258 (6.68) <.001
Otherd 33 (0.51) 2 (6.06) 20 (60.61) 4 (12.12) 7 (21.21) <.001
Biological sexc
Female 3090 (47.81) 254 (8.22) 1896 (61.36) 595 (19.26) 345 (11.17) .009
Male 3373 (52.19) 204 (6.05) 2119 (62.82) 664 (19.69) 386 (11.44) .009
Nativity statusc
Non-US born 180 (2.79) 8 (4.44) 117 (65.00) 29 (16.11) 16 (14.44) .19
US born 6283 (97.21) 450 (7.16) 3898 (62.04) 1230 (19.58) 705 (11.22) .19
Total household income to $c
24 999 and below 735 (11.37) 24 (3.27) 345 (46.94) 189 (25.71) 177 (24.08) <.001
25 000-49 999 910 (14.08) 52 (5.71) 490 (53.85) 206 (22.64) 162 (17.80) <.001
50 000-74 999 919 (14.22) 67 (7.29) 554 (60.28) 185 (20.13) 113 (12.30) <.001
75 000-99 999 1008 (15.60) 66 (6.55) 620 (61.51) 223 (22.12) 99 (9.82) <.001
100 000-199 999 2104 (32.55) 170 (8.08) 1437 (68.30) 345 (16.40) 152 (7.22) <.001
200 000 and above 787 (12.18) 79 (10.04) 569 (72.30) 111 (14.10) 28 (3.56) <.001
Parent education levelc
High school or less 791 (12.24) 33 (4.17) 381 (48.17) 200 (25.28) 177 (22.38) <.001
Some college 981 (15.18) 64 (6.52) 554 (56.47) 214 (21.81) 149 (15.19) <.001
Associate’s or Bachelor’s 2873 (44.45) 222 (7.73) 1815 (63.17) 537 (18.69) 299 (10.41) <.001
Graduate degree 1818 (28.13) 139 (7.65) 1265 (69.58) 308 (16.94) 106 (5.83) <.001

Abbreviations: T1, time 1 (ie, 2017 to 2019); T2, time 2 (ie, 2018-2020).

a

P values determined using 1 way analysis of variance test for continuous variables and χ2 tests for categorical variables.

b

Continuous variables presented as mean (SD).

c

Categorical variables presented as No. (column %) in column 1 and as N (row %) in columns 2-5.

d

Includes all respondents who selected only the other race checkbox.

Racial Discrimination and Adiposity

In the unadjusted model, greater racial discrimination exposure at time 1 was associated with a higher BMI at time 2 (β, 0.05; 95% CI, 0.02-0.08) (Table 2). After adjusting for covariates, racial discrimination exposure remained positively associated with BMI (β, 0.04; 95% CI, 0.01-0.08). In the unadjusted model, greater racial discrimination exposure at time 1 was associated with a higher waist circumference at time 2 (β, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.15-0.54) (Table 2). After adjusting for covariates, racial discrimination exposure remained positively associated with waist circumference (β, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.04-0.44).

Table 2. Results of Unadjusted and Adjusted Multiple Regression Models of the Prospective Associations Between Children’s Mean Self-Reported Perceived Racial Discrimination Score and Measures of Adipositya .

Variable Participant, β (95% CI) (N = 6463)
Year 2 BMI z score Year 2 waist circumference
Unadjusted Adjusted Unadjusted Adjusted
Perceived racial discrimination 0.05 (0.02 to 0.08)b 0.04 (0.01 to 0.08)c 0.35 (0.15 to 0.54)b 0.24 (0.04 to 0.44)c
Age, y NA 0.01 (−0.01 to 0.03) NA 0.21 (0.09 to 0.32)b
Sex
Male NA 1 [Reference] NA 1 [Reference]
Female NA 0.09 (0.07 to 0.12)b NA −0.04 (−0.18 to 0.10)
Nativity status
US born NA 1 [Reference] NA 1 [Reference]
Non-US born NA 0.01 (−0.06 to 0.09) NA −0.44 (−0.86 to −0.01)c
Total household income, $
24 999 or less NA 1 [Reference] NA 1 [Reference]
25 000-49 999 NA −0.05 (−0.10 to 0.00)d NA −0.12 (−0.41 to 0.16)
50 000-74 999 NA −0.07 (−0.12 to −0.01)c NA −0.22 (−0.52 to 0.07)
75 000-99 999 NA −0.08 (−0.13 to −0.02)b NA −0.30 (−0.60 to −0.00)c
100 000-199 999 NA −0.09 (−0.14 to −0.04)b NA −0.42 (−0.70 to −0.14)b
200 000 and above NA −0.10 (−0.16 to −0.04)b NA −0.44 (−0.78 to −0.11)b
Parent education level
High school diploma or less NA 1 [Reference] NA 1 [Reference]
Some college NA 0.04 (−0.01 to 0.09) NA −0.14 (−0.42 to 0.13)
Associate’s or Bachelor’s NA 0.01 (−0.03 to 0.06) NA −0.15 (−0.40 to 0.11)
Graduate degree NA −0.01 (−0.06 to 0.04) NA −0.45 (−0.74 to −0.17)b
Year 1 BMI z score 0.89 (0.88 to 0.90)b 0.89 (0.87 to 0.90)b NA NA
Year 1 waist circumference, in NA NA 0.86 (0.84 to 0.87)b 0.84 (0.83 to 0.86)b
Constant 0.06 (0.05 to 0.07)b 0.00 (−0.20 to 0.20) 4.93 (4.50 to 5.35)b 3.78 (2.59 to 4.96)b
Observations, No. 6463 6463 6463 6463
R2 0.81 0.81 0.66 0.66

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared); NA, not applicable.

a

Age- and sex-adjusted BMI z score and waisted circumference.

b

P <.01.

c

P <.05.

d

P <.1.

Discussion

We examined the prospective association between racial discrimination and adiposity (BMI z score and waist circumference) 1 year later in a nationally representative sample of 9- to 11-year-olds. Even after adjusting for covariates (ie, age, sex, household income, parent education, and nativity status), racial discrimination was positively associated with both indicators of youth adiposity.

Racial discrimination is a social determinant of a wide range of chronic conditions in children and adolescents.14,20,21,42 We found that racial discrimination was positively associated with adiposity over time. Racial discrimination, as a psychosocial stressor, can lead to a higher BMI through biobehavioral pathways. While the mechanisms through which discrimination increases BMI and waist circumference among youths are not yet fully understood, studies have shown that exposure to discrimination can lead to changes in cortisol levels, such as flattened diurnal cortisol slopes and reduced cortisol awakening responses,21 as well as unhealthy eating habits,43 sleep problems,16 and poor mental health20,21 in children and adolescents. To date, there is a lack of research examining the potential mediating factors in the association between racial discrimination and adiposity in children and adolescents. The ABCD study provides an opportunity to leverage multiple data sets, including measures of diet and brain imaging, to gain a better understanding of the association between discrimination and adiposity in this study sample. Further studies should aim to explore the biobehavioral pathways (eg, physical activity,44 screen time,44 nucleus accumbens46) that may help to explain this association in children and adolescents.

Examining intersecting identities with racial discrimination is an important area of focus in obesity research because exposure to racial discrimination can be influenced by other identities, such as gender, sexual orientation, socioeconomic status, and more. For instance, Black children from high-income families experience higher levels of racial discrimination compared with Black children from lower-income familes.34 This aligns with the existing literature, which indicates that Black US residents with higher socioeconomic status tend to report more discrimination than Black children with a lower socioeconomic status.37 In addition, studies suggest that Black boys report more racial discrimination than Black girls.47,48 Thus, it is important to recognize the complex interplay of these identities because they may have differential influence in the association between discrimination and health outcomes. Further research with a larger sample size is needed to explore how intersectional identities, such as Black boys with a high socioeconomic status, may intersect with discrimination exposure to increase the risk of high BMI. By understanding how intersecting identities relate to discrimination experiences and health outcomes, we can develop more targeted and effective interventions to reduce health disparities.

Limitations

This study has limitations. The analysis in this study was limited to complete cases, which may result in selection bias, as participants with missing data on the variables of interest may differ from those with complete data in ways that are related to experiences of discrimination and BMI levels. Consequently, the associations observed in this study may not be generalizable to the broader population. We used 2 measures of adiposity. While BMI z score and waist circumference are reliable and valid measures for youth adiposity,49 other adiposity measures may have stronger efficiency in identifying clinical risks in children and adolescents.50 In future studies, use of multiple adiposity measures, such as body fat percentage or subcutaneous fat, will advance understanding of the association of racial discrimination on overweight and obesity risk.

While the estimate of a 0.04 mean higher BMI z score and 0.24-inch waist circumference with each increase in mean discrimination score may suggest a small statistical association, it is important to recognize that discrimination may not have an immediate strong association with adiposity. However, prolonged exposure to racial discrimination, in combination with other forms of racism, may strengthen the association between racial discrimination and adiposity over time. Therefore, even repeated small experiences of discrimination could impact risk of obesity, especially for those who are already vulnerable. This study lays the groundwork for further research to explore the longitudinal relationship between discrimination and BMI, including the potential impact of cumulative exposure on the development of obesity.

Understanding the associations of discrimination on adiposity across life course stages, especially in early childhood, is needed to develop effective and targeted prevention strategies at critical development points. In this study, only 1 type of discrimination was examined, specifically discrimination based on race or ethnicity. However, other forms of discrimination, such as sexism, weight bias, and heterosexism, are also social determinants of health and health disparities. The focus on only 1 form of discrimination does not provide a complete understanding of how discrimination impacts BMI. Furthermore, the reported racial discrimination experienced by White youths raises questions about their interpretation of the measure items compared with youth from racially minoritized groups. Further research is needed to comprehend how youths construct meaning from negative experiences that may be perceived as discriminatory. Additionally, the study’s racial discrimination scale only asked about discrimination from teachers, peers, and other adults, which may not capture all forms of discrimination experienced by participants. Therefore, future studies using discrimination measures that encompass the full range of experiences is critical to comprehending the association of discrimination with BMI.

Conclusions

Racial discrimination has adverse effects on a range of health outcomes.20,21,42 We found that racial discrimination exposure was positively and significantly associated with BMI and waist circumference over time, even when adjusting for known socioeconomic risk factors for excess adiposity, such as income. Our study highlights the need for a multifaceted approach to address racial discrimination and its impacts on the health of children and adolescents. Researchers, clinicians, educators, and policy makers should collaborate with communities to implement evidence-based strategies to prevent racial discrimination and improve the health outcomes of those disproportionately affected. One potential approach could be to optimize clinical care among pediatricians by screening patients who report experiencing racism for mental health conditions and integrating positive youth development approaches that focus on identifying strengths and protective factors.51 Additionally, there is a need for the development of theory-driven policies, practices, and curricula that address personally mediated racial discrimination and that are developed through community-based methods with a focus on prevention.51 Incorporating elements from Aaron and Standford’s 10-point strategy52 can be effective, including reducing economic inequality, reinforcing the social safety net, and strengthening nondiscrimination protections. Addressing racial discrimination is crucial to prevent longstanding racial obesity disparities and improve the health and life outcomes of future generations.53,54,55

Supplement 1.

eAppendix. Perceived Discrimination Scale

Supplement 2.

Data Sharing Statement

References

  • 1.Fryar CD, Carroll MD, Ogden CL. Prevalence of overweight, obesity, and severe obesity among children and adolescents aged 2–19 years: United States, 1963–1965 through 2015–2016. Pediatrics. 2018;141(3):e20173459. doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-3459 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Sanyaolu A, Okorie C, Qi X, Locke J, Rehman S.. Childhood and adolescent obesity in the United States: a public health concern. Glob Pediatr Health. Published online December 1, 2019. doi: 10.1177/2333794X19891305 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lange SJ, Kompaniyets L, Freedman DS, et al. ; DNP3 . Longitudinal trends in body mass index before and during the COVID-19 pandemic among persons aged 2-19 years—United States, 2018-2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021;70(37):1278-1283. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7037a3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Jacobs DR Jr, Woo JG, Sinaiko AR, et al. Childhood cardiovascular risk factors and adult cardiovascular events. N Engl J Med. 2022;386(20):1877-1888. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2109191 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Mattsson N, Rönnemaa T, Juonala M, Viikari JS, Raitakari OT. Childhood predictors of the metabolic syndrome in adulthood: the cardiovascular risk in young Finns study. Ann Med. 2008;40(7):542-552. doi: 10.1080/07853890802307709 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Williams EP, Mesidor M, Winters K, Dubbert PM, Wyatt SB. Overweight and obesity: prevalence, consequences, and causes of a growing public health problem. Curr Obes Rep. 2015;4(3):363-370. doi: 10.1007/s13679-015-0169-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Dixon B, Peña MM, Taveras EM. Lifecourse approach to racial/ethnic disparities in childhood obesity. Adv Nutr. 2012;3(1):73-82. doi: 10.3945/an.111.000919 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Sahoo K, Sahoo B, Choudhury AK, Sofi NY, Kumar R, Bhadoria AS. Childhood obesity: causes and consequences. J Family Med Prim Care. 2015;4(2):187-192. doi: 10.4103/2249-4863.154628 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Nishtar S, Gluckman P, Armstrong T. Ending childhood obesity: a time for action. Lancet. 2016;387(10021):825-827. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00140-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Yusuf ZI, Dongarwar D, Yusuf RA, Bell M, Harris T, Salihu HM. Social determinants of overweight and obesity among children in the United States. Int J MCH AIDS. 2020;9(1):22-33. doi: 10.21106/ijma.337 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Anderson PM, Butcher KF, Schanzenbach DW. Understanding recent trends in childhood obesity in the United States. Econ Hum Biol. 2019;34:16-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ehb.2019.02.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kumanyika SK. A framework for increasing equity impact in obesity prevention. Am J Public Health. 2019;109(10):1350-1357. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2019.305221 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Jones CP. Levels of racism: a theoretic framework and a gardener’s tale. Am J Public Health. 2000;90(8):1212-1215. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.90.8.1212 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lewis TT, Cogburn CD, Williams DR. Self-reported experiences of discrimination and health: scientific advances, ongoing controversies, and emerging issues. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2015;11(1):407-440. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032814-112728 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Paradies Y, Ben J, Denson N, et al. Racism as a determinant of health: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2015;10(9):e0138511. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138511 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Williams DR, Lawrence JA, Davis BA, Vu C. Understanding how discrimination can affect health. Health Serv Res. 2019;54(Suppl 2)(suppl 2):1374-1388. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13222 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Corral I, Landrine H. Racial discrimination and health-promoting vs damaging behaviors among African-American adults. J Health Psychol. 2012;17(8):1176-1182. doi: 10.1177/1359105311435429 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Lawrence JA, Kawachi I, White K, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the Everyday Discrimination Scale and biomarker outcomes. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2022;142:105772. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Priest N, Truong M, Chong S, et al. Experiences of racial discrimination and cardiometabolic risk among Australian children. Brain Behav Immun. 2020;87:660-665. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2020.02.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Priest N, Paradies Y, Trenerry B, Truong M, Karlsen S, Kelly Y. A systematic review of studies examining the relationship between reported racism and health and wellbeing for children and young people. Soc Sci Med. 2013;95:115-127. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.11.031 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Cave L, Cooper MN, Zubrick SR, Shepherd CCJ. Racial discrimination and child and adolescent health in longitudinal studies: a systematic review. Soc Sci Med. 2020;250:112864. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112864 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Stepanikova I, Baker EH, Simoni ZR, et al. The role of perceived discrimination in obesity among African Americans. Am J Prev Med. 2017;52(1S1)(suppl 1):S77-S85. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.07.034 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Thorpe RJ Jr, Parker LJ, Cobb RJ, Dillard F, Bowie J. Association between discrimination and obesity in African-American men. Biodemography Soc Biol. 2017;63(3):253-261. doi: 10.1080/19485565.2017.1353406 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Gee GC, Ro A, Gavin A, Takeuchi DT. Disentangling the effects of racial and weight discrimination on body mass index and obesity among Asian Americans. Am J Public Health. 2008;98(3):493-500. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.114025 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Manns-James L, Anthony MK, Neal-Barnett A. Racial discrimination, racial identity, and obesity in collegiate African American women. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2021;8(5):1217-1231. doi: 10.1007/s40615-020-00880-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Hunte HER, Williams DR. The association between perceived discrimination and obesity in a population-based multiracial and multiethnic adult sample. Am J Public Health. 2009;99(7):1285-1292. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.128090 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Johnson P, Risica PM, Gans KM, Kirtania U, Kumanyika SK. Association of perceived racial discrimination with eating behaviors and obesity among participants of the SisterTalk study. J Natl Black Nurses Assoc. 2012;23(1):34-40. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Shelton RC, Puleo E, Bennett GG, McNeill LH, Sorensen G, Emmons KM. The association between racial and gender discrimination and body mass index among residents living in lower-income housing. Ethn Dis. 2009;19(3):251-257. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Nelson DS, Gerras JM, McGlumphy KC, et al. Racial discrimination and low household education predict higher body mass index in African American youth. Child Obes. 2018;14(2):114-121. doi: 10.1089/chi.2017.0218 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Karcher NR, Barch DM. The ABCD study: understanding the development of risk for mental and physical health outcomes. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2021;46(1):131-142. doi: 10.1038/s41386-020-0736-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Garavan H, Bartsch H, Conway K, et al. Recruiting the ABCD sample: Design considerations and procedures. Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2018;32:16-22. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2018.04.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . CDC Extended BMI-for-age Growth Charts. Published December 12, 2022. Accessed December 28, 2022. https://www.cdc.gov/growthcharts/extended-bmi.htm
  • 33.Phinney JS, Madden T, Santos LJ. Psychological variables as predictors of perceived ethnic discrimination among minority and immigrant adolescents. J Appl Soc Psychol. 1998;28(11):937-953. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1998.tb01661.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Nagata JM, Ganson KT, Sajjad OM, Benabou SE, Bibbins-Domingo K. Prevalence of perceived racism and discrimination among US Children aged 10 and 11 years: the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study. JAMA Pediatr. 2021;175(8):861-863. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2021.1022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Cano MÁ, Schwartz SJ, Castillo LG, et al. Depressive symptoms and externalizing behaviors among Hispanic immigrant adolescents: examining longitudinal effects of cultural stress. J Adolesc. 2015;42:31-39. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2015.03.017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Seaton EK, Yip T, Sellers RM. A longitudinal examination of racial identity and racial discrimination among African American adolescents. Child Dev. 2009;80(2):406-417. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01268.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Lewis JA, Grzanka PR. Applying intersectionality theory to research on perceived racism. Alvarez AN, Liang CTH, Neville HA, eds. In: The Cost of Racism for People of Color: Contextualizing Experiences of Discrimination. Cultural, racial, and ethnic psychology book series. American Psychological Association; 2016:31-54. doi: 10.1037/14852-003 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Fakhouri TH, et al. Prevalence of obesity among youths by household income and education level of head of household—United States 2011-2014. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018;67(6):186-189. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6706a3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Tummala-Narra P, Claudius M. Perceived discrimination and depressive symptoms among immigrant-origin adolescents. Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol. 2013;19(3):257-269. doi: 10.1037/a0032960 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Jackson MI. Nativity differences in youths’ weight trajectories: foreign-born health integration during the transition to adulthood. Soc Sci Res. 2011;40(5):1419-1433. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2011.04.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Ross PT, Hart-Johnson T, Santen SA, Zaidi NLB. Considerations for using race and ethnicity as quantitative variables in medical education research. Perspect Med Educ. 2020;9(5):318-323. doi: 10.1007/S40037-020-00602-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Benner AD, Wang Y, Shen Y, Boyle AE, Polk R, Cheng YP. Racial/ethnic discrimination and well-being during adolescence: A meta-analytic review. Am Psychol. 2018;73(7):855-883. doi: 10.1037/amp0000204 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Brodish AB, Cogburn CD, Fuller-Rowell TE, Peck S, Malanchuk O, Eccles JS. Perceived racial discrimination as a predictor of health behaviors: the moderating role of gender. Race Soc Probl. 2011;3(3):160-169. doi: 10.1007/s12552-011-9050-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Nagata JM, Smith N, Alsamman S, et al. Association of physical activity and screen time with body mass index among US adolescents. JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6(2):e2255466-e2255466. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.55466 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Kaufman JS, Cooper RS. Commentary: considerations for use of racial/ethnic classification in etiologic research. Am J Epidemiol. 2001;154(4):291-298. doi: 10.1093/aje/154.4.291 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Assari S. Stronger association between nucleus accumbens density and body mass index in low-income and African American children. Res Health Sci. 2020;5(2):107-120. doi: 10.22158/rhs.v5n2p107 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Seaton EK, Caldwell CH, Sellers RM, Jackson JS. The prevalence of perceived discrimination among African American and Caribbean Black youth. Dev Psychol. 2008;44(5):1288-1297. doi: 10.1037/a0012747 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Leath S, Mathews C, Harrison A, Chavous T. Racial identity, racial discrimination, and classroom engagement outcomes among Black girls and boys in predominantly Black and predominantly White school districts. Am Educ Res J. 2019;56(4):1318-1352. doi: 10.3102/0002831218816955 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Rothman KJ. BMI-related errors in the measurement of obesity. Int J Obes (Lond). 2008;32(S3)(suppl 3):S56-S59. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2008.87 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Janssen I, Katzmarzyk PT, Ross R. Waist circumference and not body mass index explains obesity-related health risk. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004;79(3):379-384. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/79.3.379 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Trent M, Dooley DG, Dougé J; SECTION ON ADOLESCENT HEALTH; COUNCIL ON COMMUNITY PEDIATRICS; COMMITTEE ON ADOLESCENCE . The impact of racism on child and adolescent health. Pediatrics. 2019;144(2):e20191765. doi: 10.1542/peds.2019-1765 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Aaron DG, Stanford FC. Is obesity a manifestation of systemic racism: a ten-point strategy for study and intervention. J Intern Med. 2021;290(2):416-420. doi: 10.1111/joim.13270 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Hennessy E, Korn AR, Economos CD. Using systems approaches to catalyze whole-of-community childhood obesity prevention efforts. The Chicago Council on Global Affairs. Accessed June 8, 2023. https://globalaffairs.org/sites/default/files/2020-11/Report-Using-Systems-Approach-to-Catalyze-Change.PDF
  • 54.Bleich SN, Segal J, Wu Y, Wilson R, Wang Y. Systematic review of community-based childhood obesity prevention studies. Pediatrics. 2013;132(1):e201-e210. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-0886 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Economos CD, Hyatt RR, Goldberg JP, et al. A community intervention reduces BMI z score in children: shape up Somerville first year results. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2007;15(5):1325-1336. doi: 10.1038/oby.2007.155 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplement 1.

eAppendix. Perceived Discrimination Scale

Supplement 2.

Data Sharing Statement


Articles from JAMA Network Open are provided here courtesy of American Medical Association

RESOURCES