The current and potential future scenario regarding consumers of new and emerging tobacco and nicotine products and their sustained addiction to nicotine is a significant global public health concern. To address this issue, it is crucial to incorporate individuals addicted to these products into the existing treatments for smoking cessation, as per the Good Practice Statements (GPS) provided by the GRADE working group1-3.
GPS consist of actionable statements that can bring about substantial benefits or harms, but do not undergo the formal assessment of evidence quality as required by the GRADE method for formulating recommendations. While formulating GPS, supporting literature should be available, such as reports from international organizations or agencies, reviews, case reports, or clinical trials. The GRADE working group has proposed five criteria to evaluate the appropriateness of issuing GPS3, distinguishing them from GRADE recommendations:
Statement is clear and actionable;
Message is necessary regarding healthcare practice;
Implementation of the statement is likely to result in large net positive consequences;
Summarization of evidence would be a poor use of guideline panel’s time; and
The rationale connecting the indirect evidence used to support the statement is clear and explicit.
In situations where studies do not include users of various tobacco and nicotine products like electronic cigarettes, heated tobacco products, or other emerging products containing tobacco and/or nicotine with addictive potential, it may be necessary to develop GPS to address nicotine dependence. The interventions recommended in these GPS are based on existing evidence-based interventions for smoking cessation, including pharmacotherapy, counselling, and digital interventions. However, it is important to exercise caution when considering the inclusion of vulnerable groups such as children, youth, and pregnant women, and it should be done on a case-by-case basis.
For consumers of heated tobacco products, smokeless tobacco and nicotine-containing products (e.g. electronic cigarettes, nicotine pouches or any other new and emerging nicotine product with an addictive potential), the proposed GPS are the following:
GPS 1. It is reasonable to give brief advice for cessation. Brief cessation advice should consist of asking about the details of product use [type(s) of product(s), frequency of use, nicotine content, and duration of use], advising to quit, and assessing readiness to quit4-6.
For consumers motivated to quit:
GPS 2. It is reasonable to offer pharmacotherapy to treat nicotine withdrawal symptoms. Pharmacotherapy includes the use of nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) in its different formulations and/or combinations (slow release and rapid release), as well as varenicline. It is also possible to use bupropion, or alternatively cytisine, according to clinical considerations and patient choice4-13.
GPS 3. It is reasonable to offer individual or group counselling combined with pharmacotherapy. The choice of pharmacotherapy depends on clinical considerations and patient preferences4-7,9-14.
GPS 4. It is reasonable to consider nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) with counselling in youth or pregnant women unable to quit with counselling alone15.
GPS 5. It is reasonable to use a digital intervention (via applications on mobile phones, text messages, online programs)8,14,16-20.
The rationale behind the aforementioned GPS is primarily grounded in the understanding that effective treatments, both pharmacological and behavioral, for nicotine addiction in traditional cigarette smokers should also be applicable to individuals using new and emerging tobacco and nicotine products. Nicotine is the addictive substance present in both conventional tobacco and its derivatives or alternative products. Therefore, when attempting to cease the use of these various new or emerging products containing nicotine, it is necessary to consider medications that act on nicotinic receptors, just as it is the case with conventional tobacco cigarettes. NRT (nicotine replacement therapy) and varenicline, which specifically target α4β2 receptors (in the case of varenicline), meet these requirements and can be effective options for treatment. Additionally, the use of cytisine, a partial agonist of the α4β2 receptor (similar to varenicline), shows promise and may be a suitable choice13,21. There are several studies supporting the effectiveness of NRT and varenicline for the treatment of smokeless tobacco addiction, as well as case reports demonstrating their efficacy in treating electronic cigarette addiction9,12. These studies explicitly highlight the positive outcomes of using NRT and varenicline. On the other hand, the suggestion to use bupropion and cytisine for electronic cigarette cessation or the cessation of other nicotine-containing products is primarily based on an intuitive approach, indicating that effective treatments for smoking cessation could potentially be effective for these cases as well5,13,14. Therefore, the use of bupropion and cytisine as alternative pharmacological treatments is suggested, taking into consideration the individual patient’s clinical characteristics on a case-by-case basis.
In the context of adolescents and youth, they are included in certain programs, literature reviews, and studies related to smoking and vaping cessation4,5,13,14,16-18,20. Additionally, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) offer comprehensive information on the use of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems (ENDS) and the associated risks for children, teenagers, and young adults. The CDC also provides resources and programs aimed at preventing vaping and facilitating quitting22. Regarding pregnant women, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) recommends that healthcare and obstetric care professionals inquire about all forms of tobacco or nicotine use. It further emphasizes the importance of individualizing care by offering psychosocial, behavioral, and pharmacotherapy interventions to support smoking cessation during pregnancy15.
In conclusion, there is a pressing need for the development of GPS in healthcare practice to address nicotine dependence in individuals using non-conventional tobacco and nicotine products. These GPS should be supported by a clear and explicit rationale that connects the available indirect evidence. However, it is essential to conduct large-scale studies involving users of these products to obtain robust evidence on the appropriate and effective treatment approaches.
Currently, it is crucial to provide treatment indications in the form of GPS for all individuals addicted to these new and emerging products who are motivated to quit. These GPS are not only sustainable but also based on treatment approaches that have already demonstrated effectiveness in smoking cessation. Implementing these GPS can have positive consequences for public health, as they offer viable solutions for nicotine addiction in this specific population.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
The authors have each completed and submitted an ICMJE form for disclosure of potential conflicts of interest. The authors declare that they have no competing interests, financial or otherwise, related to the current work. All authors report support payments to their Institution from the European Union.
FUNDING
The Joint Action on strengthening cooperation between interested Member States and the Commission in the area of Tobacco Control received funding from the European Union’s Health Program (2014–2020) under grant agreement N°101035968. DC-P, EF and AML are partially supported by the Ministry of Universities and Research, Government of Catalonia (grant number 2021SGR00906) and thank CERCA Programme for its institutional support to IDIBELL.
ETHICAL APPROVAL AND INFORMED CONSENT
Ethical approval and informed consent were not required for this study.
DATA AVAILABILITY
Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created.
PROVENANCE AND PEER REVIEW
Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
DISCLAIMER
The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors.
REFERENCES
- 1.Guyatt GH, Alonso-Coello P, Schünemann HJ, et al. Guideline panels should seldom make good practice statements: guidance from the GRADE Working Group. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016;80:3–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.07.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lotfi T, Hajizadeh A, Moja L, et al. A taxonomy and framework for identifying and developing actionable statements in guidelines suggests avoiding informal recommendations. J Clin Epidemiol. 2022;141:161–171. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.09.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Dewidar O, Lotfi T, Langendam M, et al. Which actionable statements qualify as good practice statements In Covid-19 guidelines? A systematic appraisal. BMJ Evid Based Med. 2022;27(6):361–369. doi: 10.1016/bmjebm-2021-111866. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Rosen JB, Sockrider M. Management of smoking and vaping cessation in adolescents. Updated November 1, 2021. Accessed June 5, 2023. https://www.uptodate.com/contents/management-of-smoking-and-vaping-cessation-in-adolescents.
- 5.Hadland SE, Chadi N. Through the Haze: What Clinicians Can Do to Address Youth Vaping. J Adolesc Health. 2020;66(1):10–14. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2019.10.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Greenhalgh EM. 18.11 Cessation interventions for e-cigarette users. In: Greenhalgh EM, Scollo MM, Winstanley MH, editors. Tobacco in Australia: Facts and issues. Melbourne: Cancer Council Victoria; 2023. Accessed June 5, 2023. https://www.tobaccoinaustralia.org.au/chapter-18-harm-reduction/18-11-cessation-interventions-for-e-cigarette-users. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health Pharmacological Interventions for Vaping Cessation. Canadian Journal of Health Technologies. 2021 Accessed June 5, 2023. https://www.canjhealthtechnol.ca/index.php/cjht/article/download/rc1357/rc1357. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.How to quit e-cigarettes? WHO; 2021. May 25, 2021. Accessed June 5, 2023. https://www.who.int/news-room/questions-and-answers/item/how-to-quit-e-cigarettes. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Silver B, Ripley-Moffitt C, Greyber J, Goldstein AO. Successful use of Nicotine Replacement Therapy to quit e-cigarettes: lack of treatment protocol highlights need for guidelines. Clin Case Rep. 2016;4(4):409–411. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Barkat SS, Tellier SM, Eloma AS. Varenicline for cessation from nicotine-containing electronic cigarettes. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2019;76(23):1894–1895. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/zxz218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Sahr M, Kelsh S, Blower N, Sohn M. Pilot Study of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems (ENDS) Cessation Methods. Pharmacy (Basel) 2021;9(1):21. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy9010021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ebbert JO, Elrashidi MY, Stead LF. Interventions for smokeless tobacco use cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;2015(10):CD004306. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004306.pub5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Bittoun R. Managing Vaping Cessation: A Monograph for Counselling Adult and Adolescent Vapers. Avondale University; Accessed June 5, 2023. https://research.avondale.edu.au/oer_materials/1/ [Google Scholar]
- 14.Adams ZW, Kwon E, Aalsma MC, Zapolski TCB, Dir A, Hulvershorn LA. Treatment of Adolescent e-Cigarette Use: Limitations of Existing Nicotine Use Disorder Treatment and Future Directions for e-Cigarette Use Cessation. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2021;60(1):14–16. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2020.07.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Tobacco and Nicotine Cessation During Pregnancy: ACOG Committee Opinion, Number 807. Obstet Gynecol. 2020 May;135(5):e221–e229. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Reducing Vaping Among Youth and Young Adults. SAMHSA; Accessed June 5, 2023. https://store.samhsa.gov/sites/default/files/SAMHSA_Digital_Download/PEP20-06-01-003_508_0.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Berg CJ, Krishnan N, Graham AL, Abroms LC. A synthesis of the literature to inform vaping cessation interventions for young adults. Addict Behav. 2021;119:106898. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2021.106898. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Graham AL, Amato MS, Cha S, Jacobs MA, Bottcher MM, Papandonatos GD. Effectiveness of a Vaping Cessation Text Message Program Among Young Adult e-Cigarette Users: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2021;181(7):923–930. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.1793. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Yuko Noda, Ryuhei So, Misaki Sonoda, Takahiro Tabuchi, Akihiro Nomura. The Usefulness of a Smartphone App–Based Smoking Cessation Program for Conventional Cigarette Users, Heated Tobacco Product Users, and Dual Users: Retrospective Study. J Med Internet Res. 2023;25:e42776. doi: 10.1101/2022.07.13.22277567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.NOT for Me: Vaping Cessation App. Ask. Published July 21, 2021. Accessed June 5, 2023. https://allianceforsafekids.org/not-for-me-vaping-cessation-app/ [Google Scholar]
- 21.Coe JW, Brooks PR, Vetelino MG, et al. Varenicline: An α4β2 Nicotinic Receptor Partial Agonist for Smoking Cessation. J Med Chem. 2005;48(10):3474–3477. doi: 10.1021/jm050069n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Quick Facts on the Risks of E-cigarettes for Kids, Teens, and Young Adults. CDC; Accessed June 5, 2023. https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/basic_information/e-cigarettes/Quick-Facts-on-the-Risks-of-E-cigarettes-for-Kids-Teens-and-Young-Adults.html. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created.