Abstract
Healthcare workers (HCWs), as frontline soldiers in the fight against COVID-19, were more exposed to the risk of contracting this disease. In addition to facing psychological, social, and physical trauma and post-traumatic stress due to the corona pandemic, HCWs were also exposed to complications due to the use of personal protective equipment (PPE). The impermeable and confining nature of some PPE poses complications for HCWs that can endanger their physical health, while also affecting the quality of healthcare they provide. Among the complications of using PPE, respiratory problems are more worrisome than other complications. This article makes a suggestion of a breathing room (BR) to improve the health and performance of HCWs in caring for patients with infectious respiratory diseases. A debate on the strengths of the implementation of a BR in hospitals is described.
Keywords: breathing rooms, performance, healthcare workers
Introduction
COVID-19, or severe acute respiratory syndrome caused by the coronavirus, is a major problem for public health worldwide (Saffari et al., 2020). Healthcare workers (HCWs), as frontline soldiers in the fight against COVID-19, were more exposed to the risk of contracting this disease (Choudhury et al., 2020). International health organizations, such as the World Health Organization (WHO), developed guidelines and protocols to protect the safety of HCWs. One of the most important guidelines was the proper use of personal protective equipment (PPE). HCWs were required to use protective clothing, a head cap, respiratory protective equipment (RPE), face shields, along with gloves and goggles during the global pandemic (WHO, 2020).
According to general studies, in addition to facing psychological, social, and physical trauma and post-traumatic stress due to the corona pandemic, HCWs were also exposed to complications due to the use of PPE (Davey et al., 2020; Kalantary et al., 2020). Agarwal et al. (2020) aimed at determining the complications of using PPE and its management method pointed out that suffocation and breathlessness were the most common complications.
Hence, the debate described the useful and accessible interventions to prevent or repair these complications with the suggestion of a breathing room (BR).
Discussion of Topic
The impermeable and confining nature of some PPE poses complications for HCWs that can endanger their physical health, while also affecting the quality of care that HCWs provide (Daghmouri et al., 2020; Mahmud et al., 2022). Among the complications of using PPE, respiratory problems are more worrying than other complications (Davey et al., 2020; Garra et al., 2021). Breathing problems may be due to increased resistance during inhalation, increased dead space, accumulation and rebreathing of CO2 in the mask chamber, and hypercapnia. Long-term use of PPE can affect the upper airway related to the disruption of the humidification process of inhaled air leading to possible nasal obstruction and eventually, mouth breathing. These conditions predispose HCWs to rhinitis and chronic inflammation of the nasal mucosa (Hopkins et al., 2021). The occurrence of these complications in the long term may cause HCWs to reduce their attention to the use of PPE or to be absent from work to prevent or repair these complications, leading to dysfunction and decrease in the quality of performance of HCWs (Kalantary et al., 2020).
One of the goals of healthcare service delivery systems managers is to maximize productivity of HCWs, therefore, considering the effects of the use of PPE on physical and mental health and the quality of care provided by HCWs, useful and accessible interventions are needed. One appropriate intervention is the suggestion of a BR to improve the health and performance of HCWs in caring for patients with infectious respiratory diseases.
Current Insights and Interpretations
The BR in each department of the hospital provides a place for HCWs to spend a few minutes in a quiet environment by removing PPEs and breathing healthy air (without a mask) and then continuing their work with renewed energy. The BR must have a negative pressure air purifier with ultra violet (UV) or UV-C lamps to make the surfaces and air of the room free from any virus, including SARS-CoV-2 and bacteria. HCWs in a BR environment can breathe safely and relax and not worry about the transmission of pollution. The BR can be established in an open space like a terrace, but conditions must be provided so that it is not placed in the passage of the exit air of the departments. Other components that can be considered to complete the BR are facilities related to visual, auditory, and olfactory senses. A monitor to display natural scenery, a suitable lighting system, a sound system to play relaxing music, access to the Internet and electronic decision support systems, health brochures, magazines, and a humidifier with pleasant aromas can make this room a peaceful place for renewing energy. Although there are rooms called relaxation or recharge rooms with some similar components, the purpose of creating relaxation or recharge rooms is improvement in mood, focus, and concentration (Bussard & Mahoney, 2022). The benefits of BR are not just mental and provide more than relaxation or recharge rooms provide.
Conclusions
A BR assures a person they are in an environment free of viruses and bacteria. This will decrease the stress of transmission and infection due to not using PPE. Reducing stress, workloads, fatigue, caring errors, psychological trauma, and complications of using PPE, and improving comfort, satisfaction, and performance are other benefits of a BR.
The success of this plan requires the cooperation of managers and planning of health policymakers to facilitate the implementation of this idea by allocating resources and spaces in hospitals. It is also suggested to conduct studies on the impact of the BR in improving the performance of HCWs and increasing the quality of patient care.
Acknowledgments
I would like to thank all the HCWs currently on the front lines to controlling the COVID-19 outbreak.
Footnotes
Author Contributions: NZ conceptualized the article. NS wrote the first draft and contributed to the content. NZ and NN reviewed and edited the article.
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Funding: The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
ORCID iD: Nafiseh Zarei https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0634-7673
References
- Agarwal A., Agarwal S., Motiani P. (2020). Difficulties encountered while using PPE kits and how to overcome them: An Indian perspective. Cureus, 12(11), e11652. 10.7759/cureus.11652 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bussard M. E., Mahoney S. (2022). Relaxation room for prelicensure nursing students. Nurse Educator, 47(6), 353. 10.1097/nne.0000000000001247 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Choudhury A., Singh M., Khurana D. K., Mustafi S. M., Ganapathy U., Kumar A., Sharma S. (2020). Physiological effects of N95 FFP and PPE in healthcare workers in COVID intensive care unit: A prospective cohort study. Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine, 24(12), 1169–1173. 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23671 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Daghmouri M. A., Akremi S., Amouri N., Ouanes S., Jaoua H., Ben Fadhel K. (2020). Personal protective equipment: A cross-sectional study in frontline healthcare workers during COVID-19 outbreak in Tunisia. Tunisie Medicale, 98(8), 633–638. PMID: 33480018. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Davey S. L., Lee B. J., Robbins T., Randeva H., Thake C. D. (2020). Heat stress and PPE during COVID-19: Impact on healthcare workers’ performance, safety and well-being in NHS settings. Journal of Hospital Infection, 108, 185–188. 10.1016/j.jhin.2020.11.027 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Garra G. M., Parmentier D., Garra G. (2021). Physiologic effects and symptoms associated with extended-use medical mask and N95 respirators. Annals of Work Exposures and Health, 65(7), 862–867. 10.1093/annweh/wxab010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hopkins S. R., Dominelli P. B., Davis C. K., Guenette J. A., Luks A. M., Molgat-Seon Y., Sá R. C., Sheel A. W., Swenson E. R., Stickland M. K. (2021). Face masks and the cardiorespiratory response to physical activity in health and disease. Annals of the American Thoracic Society, 18(3), 399–407. 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202008-990CME [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kalantary S., Khadem M., Golbabaei F. (2020). Personal protective equipment for protecting healthcare staff during COVID-19 outbreak: A narrative review. Frontiers in Emergency Medicine, 4(2 s), e61–e61. 10.22114/ajem.v0i0.409 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Mahmud R., Joy K. M. N. I., Rassel M. A., Monayem F. B., Datta P. K., Hossain M. S., Rahman M., Chowdhury A. H., Hossain M. Z., Ahmed U., Miah K. G., Rahman M. T., M M. (2022). Health hazards related to using masks and/or personal protective equipment among physicians working in public hospitals in Dhaka: A cross-sectional study. PLoS ONE, 17(9 September). 10.1371/journal.pone.0274169 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Saffari M., Vahedian-Azimi A., Mahmoudi H. (2020). Nurses’ experiences on self-protection when caring for COVID-19 patients. Journal of Military Medicine, 22, 570–579. 10.30491/JMM.22.6.570 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- World Health Organization. (2020, April). Rational use of personal protective equipment for coronavirus disease (COVID-19) and considerations during severe shortages: Interim guidance. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/331695.