The realm of prenatal diagnosis has witnessed remarkable advancements in recent years, primarily due to the widespread use of ultrasonography. This non-invasive imaging technique has revolutionized the way we perceive and manage pregnancies, allowing us to explore the intricate details of fetal development with unprecedented clarity [1]. Ultrasonographic prenatal diagnosis has emerged as an invaluable tool for identifying potential abnormalities and facilitating timely interventions, leading to improved antenatal care and better outcomes for both mother and child. Ultrasonographic prenatal diagnoses provide an intimate window to the womb, allowing healthcare professionals to observe and evaluate various aspects of fetal development. From the early stages of pregnancy, ultrasound scans enable the detection of multiple gestations, determination of gestational age, assessment of embryonic viability, and evaluation of the location of the pregnancy [2,3]. As the pregnancy progresses, detailed imaging can unveil the growth and formation of vital organs, skeletal structures, and the intricate network of blood vessels within the developing fetus. One of the most significant contributions of ultrasonographic prenatal diagnosis is its ability to detect congenital anomalies at an early stage. Through meticulous examination, anomalies such as neural tube defects, heart malformations, abdominal wall defects, and skeletal abnormalities can be identified, allowing healthcare providers to prepare for potential interventions and coordinate appropriate medical care [4,5,6,7,8,9,10]. This proactive approach aids in optimizing treatment plans, minimizing postnatal complications, and providing crucial support to parents in understanding and planning for their child’s healthcare needs. In addition to anomaly detection, ultrasonographic prenatal diagnosis plays a pivotal role in assessing fetal well-being throughout pregnancy. It enables the evaluation of amniotic fluid volume, placental health, and fetal growth patterns, allowing healthcare providers to monitor and manage conditions such as intrauterine growth restriction, placental insufficiency, and oligohydramnios [11,12,13]. Regular ultrasound examinations reassure expectant parents, identifying and managing potential issues promptly [14]. In certain cases, when further investigation or treatment is required, ultrasonographic prenatal diagnosis serves as a guiding tool for invasive procedures. Procedures such as chorionic villus sampling (CVS), amniocentesis, and fetal blood sampling can be performed under real-time ultrasound guidance, thereby minimizing the risk of complications and improving the accuracy of the procedure [15]. This level of precision enhances the safety and efficacy of these interventions, providing healthcare professionals with the necessary information for appropriate decision-making [16]. Ultrasonographic prenatal diagnosis has revolutionized the field of antenatal care, empowering healthcare providers to better understand, detect, and manage fetal anomalies and complications. The ability to visualize the developing fetus in utero has transformed the experience of pregnancy for both parents and medical professionals. Ultrasonography has become indispensable by enabling early detection, facilitating interventions, and improving overall prenatal care, leading to enhanced outcomes and fostering a sense of confidence and well-being in expectant families. As technology continues to evolve, we anticipate further advancements that will refine and expand the capabilities of ultrasonographic prenatal diagnosis, bringing us closer to a future in which every pregnancy receives the best possible care.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, R.G.; writing—original draft preparation, F.A.G. and G.G.I.; writing—review and editing, S.C. and C.M.; supervision, A.E. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
References
- 1.Smith J. Advances in ultrasonography in prenatal diagnosis. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2019;39:3–8. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Nicholas L., Fischbein R., Ernst-Milner S., Wani R. Review of International Clinical Guidelines Related to Prenatal Screening during Monochorionic Pregnancies. J. Clin. Med. 2021;10:1128. doi: 10.3390/jcm10051128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Leanza V., Incognito G.G., Gulino F.A., Tuscano A., Cimino M., Palumbo M. Cesarean Scar Pregnancy and Successful Ultrasound-Guided Removal after Uterine Artery Ligation. Case Rep. Obstet. Gynecol. 2023;2023:6026206. doi: 10.1155/2023/6026206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Orlandi G., Toscano P., Gabrielli O., Di Lella E., Lettieri A., Manzo L., Mazzarelli L.L., Sica C., Di Meglio L., Di Meglio L., et al. Prenatal Diagnosis of an Intrathoracic Left Kidney Associated with Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia: Case Report and Systematic Review. J. Clin. Med. 2023;12:3608. doi: 10.3390/jcm12113608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Staicu A., Popa-Stanila R., Albu C., Chira A., Constantin R., Boitor-Borza D., Surcel M., Rotar I.C., Cruciat G., Muresan D. Neonatal Hemochromatosis: Systematic Review of Prenatal Ultrasound Findings—Is There a Place for MRI in the Diagnostic Process? J. Clin. Med. 2023;12:2679. doi: 10.3390/jcm12072679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Vena F., Manganaro L., D’Ambrosio V., Masciullo L., Ventriglia F., Ercolani G., Bertolini C., Catalano C., Di Mascio D., D’Alberti E., et al. Neuroimaging and Cerebrovascular Changes in Fetuses with Complex Congenital Heart Disease. J. Clin. Med. 2022;11:6740. doi: 10.3390/jcm11226740. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Nurmaini S., Partan R.U., Bernolian N., Sapitri A.I., Tutuko B., Rachmatullah M.N., Darmawahyuni A., Firdaus F., Mose J.C. Deep Learning for Improving the Effectiveness of Routine Prenatal Screening for Major Congenital Heart Diseases. J. Clin. Med. 2022;11:6454. doi: 10.3390/jcm11216454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Recker F., Weber E.C., Strizek B., Herberg U., Brockmaier K., Gottschalk I., Geipel A., Gembruch U., Berg C. Prenatal Diagnosis and Outcome of Scimitar Syndrome: A Case Series of Six Patients. J. Clin. Med. 2022;11:1696. doi: 10.3390/jcm11061696. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ferreira R.G., Mendonça C.R., de Moraes C.L., de Abreu Tacon F.S., Ramos L.L.G., Melo N.C., Sbragia L., do Amaral W.N., Ruano R. Ultrasound Markers for Complex Gastroschisis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Clin. Med. 2021;10:5215. doi: 10.3390/jcm10225215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Pappalardo E., Gulino F.A., Ettore C., Cannone F., Ettore G. Body Stalk Anomaly Complicated by Ectopia Cordis: First-Trimester Diagnosis of Two Cases Using 2- and 3-Dimensional Sonography. J. Clin. Med. 2023;12:1896. doi: 10.3390/jcm12051896. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Bohiltea R.E., Varlas V.N., Dima V., Iordache A.M., Salmen T., Mihai B.M., Bohiltea A.T., Vladareanu E.M., Ducu I., Grigoriu C. The Strategy against Iatrogenic Prematurity Due to True Umbilical Knot: From Prenatal Diagnosis Challenges to the Favorable Fetal Outcome. J. Clin. Med. 2022;11:818. doi: 10.3390/jcm11030818. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Leanza V., D’Urso V., Gulisano M., Incognito G.G., Palumbo M. Bulging of both membranes and fetal lower limbs. Minerva Obstet. Gynecol. 2021;73:654–658. doi: 10.23736/S2724-606X.21.04785-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Leanza V., Incognito G.G., Gulisano M., Incognito D., Correnti S.G., Palumbo M. Herlyn-Werner-Wunderlich syndrome and central placenta previa in a COVID-19 positive pregnant woman: A case report. Ital. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 2023;35:136–141. doi: 10.36129/jog.2022.54. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Moore T.R., Cayle J.E. The amniotic fluid index in normal human pregnancy. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2016;161:382–388. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(90)90009-V. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ciortea R., Malutan A.M., Bucuri C.E., Berceanu C., Rada M.P., Ormindean C.M., Mihu D. Amniocentesis—When It Is Clear That It Is Not Clear. J. Clin. Med. 2023;12:454. doi: 10.3390/jcm12020454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Krampl E., Brugger P.C., Prayer D. Fetal ultrasound: Challenges in the third trimester. Prenat. Diagn. 2014;34:1241–1246. [Google Scholar]