Abstract
The global market of food, cosmetics, and pharmaceutical products requires continuous tracking of harmful ingredients and microbial contamination for the sake of the safety of both products and consumers as these products greatly dominate the consumer’s health, directly or indirectly. The existence, survival, and growth of microorganisms in the product may lead to physicochemical degradation or spoilage and may infect the consumer at another end. It has become a challenge for industries to produce a product that is safe, self-stable, and has high nutritional value, as many factors such as physical, chemical, enzymatic, or microbial activities are responsible for causing spoilage to the product within the due course of time. Thus, preservatives are added to retain the virtue of the product to ensure its safety for the consumer. Nowadays, the use of synthetic/artificial preservatives has become common and has not been widely accepted by consumers as they are aware of the fact that exposure to preservatives can lead to adverse effects on health, which is a major area of concern for researchers. Naturally occurring phenolic compounds appear to be extensively used as bio-preservatives to prolong the shelf life of the finished product. Based on the convincing shreds of evidence reported in the literature, it is suggested that phenolic compounds and their derivatives have massive potential to be investigated for the development of new moieties and are proven to be promising drug molecules. The objective of this article is to provide an overview of the significant role of phenolic compounds and their derivatives in the preservation of perishable products from microbial attack due to their exclusive antioxidant and free radical scavenging properties and the problems associated with the use of synthetic preservatives in pharmaceutical products. This article also analyzes the recent trends in preservation along with technical norms that regulate the food, cosmetic, and pharmaceutical products in the developing countries.
Keywords: natural phenolic compounds, preservatives, antioxidant, microbial activities, radical scavenging
1. Introduction
Shelf life refers to the duration between manufacturing and expiry date, during which the product is expected to retain its original characteristics and remain acceptable for consumers as far as its quality is concerned. During this duration, the product is susceptible to chemical, biological, and physical deterioration, which ultimately degrade the qualitative characteristics of the product [1]. Therefore, preservatives have been extensively used in various pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, and food products to prevent them from deterioration [2,3]. Many factors are responsible for governing the mean life of the product such as the growth of microorganisms, heating, inappropriate temperature, long storage, change in moisture content, reaction with light and oxygen, fermentation, acidification, enzymatic changes, etc., which result in the loss of important properties of the finished product. Pharmaceutical preparation consists of a diverse range of structures and moieties that are susceptible to deterioration. Deterioration is the result of chemical reactions that occur between the various ingredients present in the formulation and the external environment. The deterioration of a product generally occurs during longer storage, affecting its stability, ultimately resulting in the product’s decline in its intended natural quality due to microbial contamination and rendering the product harmful to the consumer. In general, there are three processes by which the product degrades [4]. Chemical breakdown includes chemical incompatibilities, such as hydrolysis, oxidation, photolysis, polymerization, hydration, dehydration, and decarboxylation. [5,6]. A change in temperature, particle size, evaporation, vaporization, efflorescence, hygroscope, deliquescence, etc. are all examples of physical degradation. Everywhere we look, there are microbes that assault the product once it is opened. The product starts losing its quality quickly on a microbiological level [7].
2. Preservatives and Their Needs
An antimicrobial preservative is a natural or artificial substance added to non-sterile products in favor of preventing their decomposition due to chemical, enzymatic, or microbial activities or any undesirable chemical changes, most probably caused by microbial growth and lipid oxidation [8,9] (Figure 1). The addition of preservatives is obligatory in the case of products containing water, or organic or inorganic compounds that are at the highest risk of contamination. Products such as creams, solutions, emulsions, suspensions, parental and eye drops, etc. are likely to be perishable, which may further lead to the spoilage of products and result in the loss of some essential properties [10,11]. Therefore, preservatives are meant to be introduced during the manufacturing process to keep the essential qualitative characteristics and organoleptic properties of the product intact by retarding degradation of the product formulation during its shelf life [12]. They keep the product fresher for a longer time so that no undesirable pathogen could attack and bring about unenviable changes in the finished product.
3. Factors Monitoring the Effectiveness of Preservatives
Every product in the market, whether food, cosmetic, or pharmaceutical, comes with a shelf life. During this period, the product is expected to remain stable retaining its qualitative characteristics, but what if the effect of the preservative is lost? The effectiveness of a preservative depends upon its concentration, solubility, partition coefficient, nature of surfactants used in the formulation having antimicrobial activity, pH, etc. Consumers themselves can easily monitor the loss of effectiveness of a preservative or tarnished product by considering several factors such as the appearance of a greyish-green layer on the top surface of the product, loss of texture, bad taste and odor, change in pH, cloudiness, dryness, bleaching/fading, formation of separation layers, rancidity, staleness, etc. Additionally, some biochemical modifications that affect the organoleptic qualities of foods include hydrolysis, non-enzymatic browning (Maillard reaction), enzymatic browning, lipid oxidation, lipolysis, and proteolysis [13,14,15,16,17]. Therefore, the purpose of adding preservatives is to provide stability and protection against microbial attack, prolong the shelf life, and enhance the efficacy of the product. Before incorporation into miscellaneous products, preservatives have been investigated by researchers worldwide for their decontamination efficacy. The sorting of preservatives attributed to their mechanism of action and sources [18] is depicted below in Figure 2.
4. Mechanism of Action of Preservatives
Preservatives, irrespective of their origin and whether natural or synthetic, act through different modes of action such as:
Cell wall lysis and leakage (phenols and organomercurials).
Cross linkage (glutaraldehyde).
Interference with the integrity of the cell membrane (EDTA, quaternary ammonium compounds).
Inhibition of folic acid synthesis (parabens, benzoic acid, etc.) [19].
5. Criteria for the Selection of Preservatives
As such, there is no single preservative that is effective against all microbial strains and suits all product types. Moreover, manufacturers or regulators are required to use preservatives with the maximum permitted concentration limits specified by the regulatory authorities while taking care of the pH and temperature conditions that may affect the activity. Therefore, the selection of the right preservative is of utmost significance. Several factors based on which one can choose the best preservative are: the purpose of inclusion, proof of efficacy (which in turn depends on the chemical nature, type of interaction, dose, physicochemical properties of a drug, degree of microbial contamination, the influence of pH, storage temperature of the finished product, etc.), broad or narrow spectrum of coverage against pathogens, effectiveness(antimicrobial effectiveness test as specified in different pharmacopeias), safety information, incompatibility interactions, antimicrobial functionality or microbial protection spectrum, dosage form, compliance with a product philosophy, chemical and physical stability, toxicity studies and labeling details of the end product, etc. [20].
6. Problems Associated with Preservatives
Nowadays, the use of synthetic/artificial preservatives has become common (as they are cheap and easily available), which has not been widely accepted by consumers as they are aware of the preservatives’ short- and long-term life-threatening adverse effects on health, which is the major area of concern for researchers [21]. The presence of hazardous chemicals in the product sabotages consumer health [22,23]. The various problems/adverse effects associated with the frequent use of synthetic preservatives in various formulations have been summarized in Figure 3.
Quality control and consumer safety are of utmost importance. Preservatives are therefore necessary to maintain the average life of pharmaceutical preparations, food and cosmetics products but there have also been reports of some adverse effects associated with their frequent use. There exists an immediate need for unwrapping novel and safe preservatives from natural sources for various pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, and food products as it is evident that natural preservatives would be better in terms of the quality, safety, and longevity of the product.
7. Preservatives Used in Cosmetics
Cosmetics products are often used by people around the world almost every day and become a part of our lifestyle. Cosmetics products comprise several products ranging from shampoos to deodorants, lotions to creams, foundations to lipsticks, mouthwashes to toothpaste [24,25], and so on, as depicted in Table 1 and Table 2, with the hope of providing protection, maintenance, cleansing, minimizing body odor, beautification and developing an attractive and charming personality [24,26]. They are meant to be frequently applied on external non-sterile parts of the body, especially the skin, and are susceptible to microbial contamination with every use. Cosmetic products containing water, oils, peptides, and carbohydrates offer an ideal environment for the microbial growth of pathogenic organisms, which may further lead to the spoilage of products and result in the loss of some essential properties [10,11]. To prevent microbial growth, undesirable changes, deterioration of the cosmetic product, and chances of skin infection, two distinct classes, namely, antimicrobial and antioxidant preservatives are generally used [24]. Moreover, special measures must be taken by consumers at their end while using cosmetic products to retard their spoilage.
Table 1.
Class | Products |
---|---|
Leave-on products | Deodorants |
Antiperspirants | |
Body lotion | |
Face/Hand cream | |
Rinse-off products | Shampoo/Hair Conditioner |
Shower gel | |
Make-up/Embellishment products | Liquid Foundation |
Eyeliner/Mascara | |
Lipstick | |
Perfumes | |
Oral care products | Toothpaste |
Mouthwash | |
Protective products | Anti-wrinkle creams |
Corrective products | Beauty masks |
Hair dyes | |
Maintenance products | Shaving/Moisturizing creams |
Active products | Antiseptics |
Table 2.
Preservative and Its Chemical Structure |
Category | Toxic Effect | Cosmetics/Personal Care Products | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
Imidazolidinyl urea |
Formaldehyde releaser |
Carcinogenic | Eyeliners, mascara, eye shadows, foundation, shampoos, sunscreens, powders, tanning creams, make-up removers, concealers, moisturizing lotions, etc. | [27,28] |
Diazolidinyl Urea |
Formaldehyde releaser |
Carcinogenic | Blush, eyeliners, eye shadows, lipsticks, foundation, face powders, concealers, moisturizers, hand wash, sunscreens, hair colorants, etc. | [28] |
DMDM Hydantoin (Glydant) |
Formaldehyde releaser |
Carcinogenic, dermatitis | Exfoliants, shampoo, hair smoothing products, liquid soaps, creams, lotions, nail polish, nail glue, etc. | [29,30] |
Sodiumhydroxymethyl glycinate (SHMG) |
Formaldehyde releaser |
Carcinogenic, skin irritant | Body sprays, baby wipes, cleaning agents, shampoo, soaps, hair conditioner, etc. | [28,31] |
Quaternium-15 |
Formaldehyde releaser |
Sensitization | Blush, bronzer, eye shadow, foundation, baby products (baby oil, shampoo, wash bath), shaving creams and gels, sunscreens, etc. | [28,32,33] |
Benzalkonium chloride solution I.P (BAK) |
Quaternary ammonium compound |
Cytotoxicity, dry eye syndrome, pulmonary irritation, nasal mucosal damage, bacterial resistance, genotoxicity, apoptosis, leaching of eye lens, etc. | Deodorants and body spray, baby wipes, moisturizers, body washes, cleansers, etc. | [34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42] |
BHA BHT |
Phenolic compounds |
Endocrine disruptors, neurological problems, metabolic dysfunction, behavioral issues and may cause cancer | Lipstick, lip glosses, moisturizers, lotions, sunscreen, fragrance, clean and clear foaming face wash, face wash, soap, shampoo, deodorants, etc. | [28,43] |
R = an alkyl group Methylparaben, Ethylparaben, Propylparaben, Isobutylparaben, Butylparaben |
Paraben | Estrogenic effect and interfere with male reproductive functions, breast cancer, contact eczema, development of malignant melanoma, etc. | Creams, face powder, blusher, face pack, face scrub, nature’s facial kit, face wash, etc. | [28,43,44,45,46,47,48] |
Triclosan and triclocarbans |
Antimicrobial agent | Antibiotic resistance in bacteria, endocrine disruptor, neurotoxicity, skin sensitization, reproductive and developmental toxicity, genotoxicity, phototoxicity, carcinogenicity etc. | Foundation, lip gloss, mascara, body spray, perfume spray, medicated soaps, toothpaste, deodorants, hand wash, face wash, mouthwash, etc. | [28,49,50] |
Kathon CG: 3: 1 mixture of 5-chloro-2-methyl-4-isothiazoline-2-1 and 2-methyl-4-isothiazolin-2-one | Isothiazolinones | Allergic contact dermatitis | Body washes, liquid soaps, conditioners, shampoos, wipes, etc. | [51,52] |
Methylisothiazolinone, Methylchloroisothiazolinones |
Isothiazolinones | Skin irritant | Shampoos, conditioner, liquid hand wash, soaps, face wash, etc. | [48,53,54,55,56] |
Iodopropynylbutyl carbamate (IPBC) |
Belongs to the carbamate family of biocides |
Sensitization | Lip balm, lotions, hair dye, hair colorants, etc. | [32,52] |
Methyldibromoglutaronitrile (MDBGN) |
Contact allergy | Body lotion, hand lotion, facial lotion, sunscreen lotion, shower gels, etc. | [32,52] | |
Thiomersal |
Mercurial | Kawasaki’s Disease, genotoxicity, apoptosis, cytotoxicity, neurotoxicity, neurodevelopmental and CVS disorders | Eye make-up products | [57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65] |
Chlorobutanol |
Alcohol | Not used in aerosol dispensers, cytotoxicity, retinal toxic, irritation | Face wash, creams mouthwashes, ointments, etc. | [66,67,68] |
Benzyl Alcohol |
Aromatic alcohol |
Contact dermatitis, mucous membrane irritation, CNS depression lethargy, metabolic acidosis, toxicity on fatal development and respiratory abnormalities, etc. | Creams, baby lotion, sunscreen SPF 50, baby wipes, etc. | [69] |
Ethylhexylglycerin | Glyceryl ether | Contact allergen and impairs membrane integrity, etc. | Baby cream, shower gel, moisturizing lotions, skin peels, face masks, body butter, shampoos, conditioner, etc. | [70,71,72] |
Phenoxyethanol |
Glycol ether | Allergic and skin irritation | Hand sanitizer, perfume, F-foundation, blush, lipstick, mascara, eye shadow, hand cream, hair color and spray, lip balm, nail polish, baby wipes, etc. | [73,74,75,76] |
Chlorhexidine | Amidines | Ototoxic, nausea, stomach irritation, respiratory distress syndrome | Conditioner, creams, toothpaste, deodorants, antiperspirants, etc. | [77,78,79] |
Ascorbic acid |
Organic acid | Skin irritation | Anti-aging creams and skin toners, etc. | [80,81,82] |
Benzoic acid |
Organic acid | Carcinogenic, irritation, metabolic acidosis, asthma, convulsions, etc. | Face wash, shampoo, body wash creams, etc. | [83,84,85] |
Sodium benzoate |
Organic acid | Carcinogenic, irritation, metabolic acidosis, asthma, convulsions, etc. | Body cleanser, toothpaste, etc. | [83,84,85] |
Citric acid |
Organic acid (Alpha-hydroxy acid) |
Sensitization and irritation, etc. | Facial kit, face wash, serum, scrubbers, baby facial toners, exfoliating, cleaning products, etc. | [86] |
Sorbic acid |
Organic acid (Monocarboxylic acid) | Itching and irritation, etc. | Body lotion, eye cream, anti-aging face serum, eyeshadow, cleansing wipes, bronze powder, skincare products, etc. | [87] |
Climbazole |
Antifungal agent | Skin irritation includes redness, rashes, and itching | Hair lotions, face creams, foot care products, and rinse-off shampoo, etc. | [88] |
Hydroxyethoxyphenyl butanone |
Slight ocular irritation | Rinse off, oral care, and leave-on cosmetic products | [89,90] | |
Dehyderoacetic acid (DHA) |
Organic acid | Minimal eye irritation, allergic contact dermatitis | Shampoo, lotions, creams, mousses, sunscreens, baby care products, oral care products, foundations, powders, wipes, etc. | [91,92] |
Erythorbic acid |
Stereoisomer of ascorbic acid | Sensitization | Hair and nail products | [93] |
Formaldehyde |
Naturally occurring organic compound | Contact dermatitis, irritation and leukemia on prolonged exposure, etc. | Nail polishes, hair gels, soaps, lotions, makeup products, shampoos, etc. | [94] |
8. Food Preservatives
Foodstuffs of various types such as raw food, junk food, fast food, organic food, whole food, processed or unprocessed food, and vegetarian or non-vegetarian food exist across the globe depending upon climatic and geographical conditions. Moreover, foodstuffs are subjected to storage in go downs or houses for handling emergencies [95]. Food products are perishable items with a short shelf life ranging from a few hours to a few days to a few months. For many years, food preservation has been a great challenge for the food industry in terms of ensuring quality, nutritional value, organoleptic properties, and safety [96,97]. Preservatives are generally added to decontaminate the food product and to ensure the stability and safety of the product. The consumer demands chemical-free, fresh, nutritionally rich, tasty, smells good, and ready-to-eat food, which appeals to the taste buds and has a prolonged shelf life too. This has prompted researchers/manufacturers to search and develop natural antimicrobial preservatives. Organic acids and their derivatives depicted in Table 3 are natural compounds that have been exploited by researchers as bio-preservatives for the last few decades. They are found to be inexpensive and effective at decontaminating the food product against the population of food pathogens and are generally recognized as safe (GRAS). Several studies reported that organic acids such as acetic, citric, lactic, propionic, benzoic, and sorbic acids possess an excellent antimicrobial potential, exhibiting a broad spectrum of activity against food pathogens such as bacteria fungi and yeast [98,99,100,101].
Table 3.
Preservatives & Chemical Structure |
Toxic Effect | Food Products | References |
---|---|---|---|
Acetic acid |
Breathing difficulty, swelling, irritation | Preserved fish, preserved meat, cooking oil, curry powder, processed cheese, instant puddings, butter, bread, mozzarella cheese, baby food, etc. | [102,103] |
Ascorbic acid (Vitamin C) |
Nausea, vomiting, headache, heartburn and cramps | Fruit juices, jams, beer, soft drinks, cider, cereals, canned tuna, glaze for frozen fish, etc. | [81] |
Benzoic acid |
Carcinogenic, irritation, metabolic acidosis, asthma, convulsions, etc. | Fruit juices, soft drinks, coffee extracts, pickles; pineapple marmalade with pectin; relishes; tomato paste; tomato pulp; tomato puree, etc. | [83,84,85] |
Sodium benzoate |
Allergy, asthma, skin rashes, hyperactivity, liver cirrhosis, Parkinson’s disease, etc. | Chayavanprash, fruit juices, fruit cocktails, tomato ketchup, pasta sauce, milk products, jams, soft drinks, salad dressings, pickles, margarine, etc. | [83,84,85,87] |
Citric acid |
Numbness, rapid weight gain, cramps, mood changes, severe stomach pain, diarrhea and convulsions, etc. | Fruit juices, soft drinks, meat, frozen food, chips, biscuits, ice creams, soda, wine, etc. | [86] |
Formic acid |
Nausea, vomiting, dizziness, headache, skin allergy etc. | Livestock feed | [104] |
Lactic acid |
Brain fog, gas, and bloating | Yoghurt, olives, cucumber pickles, salad dressing, cheese, frozen desserts, soda, etc. | [105] |
Potassium lactate |
Brain fog, gas, and bloating | Meat and poultry products | [105,106,107,108] |
Propionic acid |
Corrosive, increase resistance to glucagon, norepinephrine, and insulin | Bakery products, gelatin, milk, and milk products such as cheese, yoghurt, etc. | [87,109] |
Sorbic acid |
Contact dermatitis and urticarial, etc. | Fruit juice, wine, jams, jellies, margarine, meat products, cakes, sauces, processed cheese, salads, etc. | [87] |
Potassium Sorbate |
Contact dermatitis and urticarial, etc. | Karela amla juice, Amla-Aloe vera juice with wheatgrass, milk products, etc. | [87] |
Sulphur dioxide/Sulphites Potassium bisulfate |
Allergic reactions (nausea, skin irritation, asthma, eczema, diarrhea) |
Fruit juices, cider, wines, meat products, sausages, sweets, jams, jellies, glucose syrups, dry biscuits, dry mix of rasogollas, refined sugar, misri, jaggery, glucose syrup, potatoes, beverages, raisins, pickles, chutneys, etc. | [87] |
Nitrites & Nitrates (Sodium & Potassium) |
Genotoxicity, carcinogenic (stomach and pancreatic cancer) | Meat products, hot dog, smoked fish, and many others | [87,110] |
BHA BHT |
Endocrine disruptors, neurological problems, metabolic dysfunction, behavioral issues, and may cause cancer | Hot dogs, meat, potato chips, chewing gum, vegetable oils, bread, breakfast cereals, and many others | [111] |
Triclosan |
Antibiotic resistance in bacteria, endocrine disruptor, skin sensitization, neuro-toxicity, reproductive and developmental toxicity, genotoxicity, carcinogenicity, phototoxicity, etc. | Active food packaging | [49,111,112] |
Nisin | Nausea, pruritus, skin rash and vomiting, etc. | Prepacked coconut water, canned rasgulla, baking mixes containing egg, etc. | [113] |
Dehyderoacetic acid (DHA) | Allergic contact dermatitis | Cheese, meat products, squash, etc. | [114] |
Erythorbic acid |
Hypersensitivity, nausea, vomiting, headache, diarrhea, heartburn, and cramps | Meat, frozen fruits and vegetables, beverages such as soft drinks, fruit juice, grape wine, beer, etc. | [115] |
Dimethyl dicarbonate (DMDC) |
Carcinogenic | Non-alcoholic beverages such as sports drinks, energy drinks and non-carbonated drinks such as ice tea, etc. | [116,117,118] |
9. Pharmaceutical Preservatives
Pharmaceutical preparations meant to be administered in different dosage forms usually contain additives in addition to the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API). Additives with a certain amount of impurities show interactions with the active drug component, other additives, and packaging materials. Namely, drug–additive interactions, additive–additive interactions, and package–additive interactions, which cause drug degradation [119]. In pharmaceutical solutions, generally known as liquid or oral preparations (solutions, syrups, elixirs, suspensions, etc.), the presence of a higher water content and other ingredients such as solvents and co-solvents in the formulation provides an environment that favors the growth of microorganisms. This microbial contamination causes undesirable chemical alterations in the formulation, which eventually result in product deterioration [120].
Non-sterile dosage forms are prone to microbial contamination during the manufacturing process; even sterile dosage forms in multidose containers have access to microbial growth by repeatedly withdrawn doses. Hence, in the pharmaceutical industry, the addition of preservatives becomes necessary to hurdle the prevalence of microbial growth, provide stability, retard deterioration, and increase shelf life. Although preservatives are used in low concentrations, the health issues associated with them cannot be ignored. Some commonly used preservatives in pharmaceutical preparations along with their toxic effects are listed in Table 4. The evaluation of preservative efficacy is completed in conformity with tests prescribed in a pharmacopeia to demonstrate their effectiveness in a product—antimicrobial effectiveness test (USP), efficacy of antimicrobial preservation (EP), and preservation effectiveness test (JP). Based on their chemical nature and structure, preservatives are categorized as: acids (benzoic acid and its salts, sorbic acid), alcohols (benzyl alcohol, chlorobutanol), biguanides (chlorhexidine), esters (parabens), phenols (phenol, m-cresol), mercurials (thiomersal), phenolic antioxidants (BHA, BHT), quaternary ammonium compounds (benzyl alkonium chloride, cetrimide), etc. [121].
Table 4.
Preservative & Its Structure | Category | Toxic Effect | Pharmaceuticals | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
Benzalkonium chloride solution, I.P (BAK) Ocular Preservative |
Quaternary ammonium compound |
Ocular toxicity, cytotoxicity, redness, dry eye syndrome, nasal mucosal damage, conjunctiva, post-operative inflammation, bacterial resistance, impairs tear film, genotoxicity, trabeculectomy failure, leaching of the eye lens, cataract, etc. | Eye/ear drops, nasal drops, multisurface disinfectants, Dettol, Savlon, Lysol, etc. | [68,122,123,124,125,126] |
BHA BHT |
Phenolic compounds |
Gastric irritant, endocrine disruptors, and may cause cancer |
Gels, creams, liquid and gelatin capsules |
[127,128,129] |
R = an alkyl group Methyl paraben, ethyl paraben, propyl paraben, isobutyl paraben, butyl paraben |
Paraben | Sensitization, contact dermatitis, estrogenic effect interferes with male reproductive functions, breast cancer, contact eczema, development of malignant melanoma, etc. | Local anesthetic (bupivacaine hydrochloride injection I.P.), injections (Afkim 500, gentamicin, amikacin sulphate, dexamethasone sodium phosphate injection I.P.), shaving cream, etc. | [130,131] |
Quaternium-15 |
Formaldehyde releaser | Sensitization, allergic contact dermatitis | Eye drops, contact solutions | [131,132] |
Thiomersal |
Mercurial | Genotoxicity, apoptosis, cytotoxicity, neurotoxicity, neurodevelopmental and CVS disorders | Vaccines (inactivated influenza vaccine, meningococcal polysaccharide vaccine, tetanus toxoid, DTP), contact lens solutions, disinfectant (merthiolate), | [65,68,133] |
Chlorobutanol |
Alcohol | Not used in aerosol dispensers, cytotoxicity, retinal toxic irritation |
ophthalmic ointment, ear drops, eye and nasal drops, injections, sedatives, etc. | [65,134] |
Benzyl Alcohol |
Alcohol | Contact dermatitis, mucous membrane irritation, CNS depression, lethargy, metabolic acidosis, toxicity of fatal development, and respiratory abnormalities, etc. |
Injectable drugs (anti-inflammatory, neuroleptics), cream, and lotion, etc. |
[135,136,137,138] |
Phenoxyethanol |
Glycol ether | Eye and skin irritation, allergic reactions such as contact urticaria and contact dermatitis, etc., are rare. | DTwP vaccines, DTaP vaccine | [139,140,141] |
Stabilized Oxychloro complex (second generation ocular preservatives) |
Oxidative complexes (soft preservatives) |
Cytotoxicity | Eye drops | [68,125] |
Sodium perborate (GenAqua) | ||||
Chlorhexidine | Amidines or biguanides |
Ototoxic, nausea, stomach irritation, respiratory distress syndrome | Eye drops, antiseptic mouthwashes | [68,142] |
Polyhexamethylene biguanide (PHMB) |
Polyhexanide | Carcinogenic, contact allergy, conjunctival staining, corneal staining, pain after instillation, conjunctival hyperemia | Eye drops, contact lens solutions | [143] |
Ascorbic acid |
Organic acid | Nausea, vomiting, headache, heartburn, and cramps | Eye drops | [80,81,82] |
Benzoic acid |
Acids and their salts | Carcinogenic, irritation, metabolic acidosis, asthma, convulsions, etc. | Ointments, liquid preparations | [83,84,85] |
Sodium benzoate |
Acids and their salts | Allergy, asthma, skin rashes, hyperactivity, liver cirrhosis, Parkinson’s disease, etc. | Oral suspension, mouthwash, syrup, janam ghunti, etc. | [83,84,85,87] |
Citric acid |
Acids and their salts | Numbness, rapid weight gain, cramps, mood changes, severe stomach pain, diarrhea and convulsions, etc. | Powder and vitamins, etc. | [86] |
Sorbic acid |
Acids and their salts | Contact dermatitis, and urticaria | Emulsions | [87] |
10. Natural Preservatives and Their Importance
Owing to their natural origin, bio-preservatives received lots of attention in recent years as they are much safer and more beneficial when compared to synthetic preservatives. Natural food preservatives are typically of plant, animal, and microbial origin. Natural products, derived from natural plant sources such as herbs, spices, and essential oils, are widely used to give aroma to beverages and mask the disagreeable odor of the constituents in addition to their preservative action (Figure 4) [144]. They are found to increase shelf life naturally by decreasing lipid oxidation. Some of the common conventional methods that can be used to preserve food are drying (natural and artificial), pickling (using salt or vinegar), freezing, high-pressure processing, and the edible coating technique [145].
Plant phenols are divided into different classes, including simple phenols, phenolic acids, anthocyanins, stilbenes, flavonoids, tannins, lignans, and lignins (Figure 5). Phenolic acids are aromatic secondary plant metabolites that are extensively spread across the plant kingdom. [146]. Currently, there is much scientific interest in their potential protective role against oxidative stress-related diseases. The main edible sources of phenolic acids are fruits, vegetables, cereals, seeds, berries, beverages, olives, and aromatic plants, and they can be found in almost all parts of the plant [147,148]. They occur in the form of esters, glycosides, and amides but rarely in the free form [149]. Despite their origin, these versatile molecules have been reported to possess a wider canvas of biological activities such as antioxidant, antibacterial, antifungal, antiviral, anticancer, anti-inflammatory, anti-diabetic, insecticidal, estrogenic, and keratolytic activities, and many more [150,151,152]. Phenolic compounds are well known for their antioxidant potential and have been extensively used as bio-preservatives to elongate their shelf life, besides their other well-established health benefits. Phenolic acids are non-flavonoid polyphenols that contain a carboxyl group with one or more hydroxyl groups linked to a benzene ring [153,154]. Phenolic acids are known to possess two distinctive carbon frameworks: hydroxybenzoic acid (benzoic acid derivatives) and hydroxycinnamic acid (cinnamic acid derivatives). In these two carbon frameworks, even though the fundamental frame remains the same, the structural variation in the numbers and orientation of hydroxyl groups on the aromatic ring results in a variety of potential derivatives. Hydroxybenzoic acids with seven carbon atoms have a general structure of C6-C1 derived directly from benzoic acid and are present in foods in glucoside form. Some common hydroxybenzoic acids are protocatechuic acid, vanillic acid, syringic acid, and gallic acid. Hydroxycinnamic acids are natural phenylpropanoids having a general structure of C6-C3 derived directly from cinnamic acid and are mostly present in the bound form. Among hydroxycinnamic acids, sinapic acid, caffeic acid, ferulic acid, and p-coumaric acid are the most abundant compounds in foods [155,156] (Figure 5). In both these derivatives, the variation lies in their hydroxylation and methylation patterns in aromatic rings.
Structure–activity relationship (SAR) studies of phenolic acids reveal that the reactivity of the phenol moiety imparts antioxidant activity to a greater extent but can also be affected by some other parameters such as the chemical structure, number, position of hydroxyl groups, substituents on the phenolic ring, and esterification of the carboxyl group. They act as reducing agents, hydrogen donors, and oxygen suppressants when added to food products (Figure 6). They also can inhibit the enzymes involved in radical generation and act as free radical scavengers [157,158]. In general, they are used to prolong the shelf life by preventing oxidative rancidity, degradation, discoloration, contamination, and any other undesirable changes from occurring. Because of their presence in natural plant-based foods and their role as dietary antioxidants, along with radical scavenging abilities, they have received a lot of attention from researchers worldwide [146,159].
10.1. Natural Plant Constituents as Antimicrobial/Antioxidants
Antimicrobial agents derived from natural sources have been recognized and used anciently in preservation [160]. The importance of natural sources as antimicrobials/antioxidants is well established and this allows them to be selected as potential candidates for novel preservatives (Table 5 and Figure 7).
Table 5.
Natural Sources | Phenolic Content with Antioxidant/Antimicrobial Activity | References |
---|---|---|
Allium cepa | Protocatechuic acid | [161] |
Ananas comosus | Coumaric acid and ferulic acid | [162] |
Berries | Hydroxycinnamic and hydroxybenzoic acids | [163,164,165] |
Coffea arabica | Hydroxycinammic acids | [164] |
Daucus carota | p-Coumaric, chlorogenic, and caffeic acids | [166,167] |
Emblica officinalis | 1,8-Cineole | [168,169] |
Fagopyrum esculentum | Rutin, quercetin, and catechins | [170,171,172] |
Glycine max | Protocatechuic acid, p-hydroxybenzoic acids, chlorogenic acid, etc. | [173] |
Malus domestica | Coumaric acid, catechin, epicatechin, chlorogenic acid, procyanidin and gallic acid, etc. | [174] |
Mangifera indica | Myricetin, chlorogenic acid, kaempferol, gallic acid, sinapic acid, and ferulic acid | [175] |
Mushroom species | p-Hydroxybenzoic, protocatechuic, gallic, vanillic, coumaric, syringic, gentisic, ferulic, cinnamic, caffeic acids | [176] |
Origanum vulgare | Rosmarinic acid | [177] |
Oryza sativa | Protocatechuic acid | [178] |
Psidium guajava | Chlorogenic Acid, gallic acid, Kaempferol, sinapic acid, and myricetin | [175] |
Punica granatum | Quercetin, kaempferol, luteolin, and Myricetin, etc. |
[179] |
Salvia rosmarinus | Rosmarinic acid, carnosol, and carnosic acid | [177] |
Syzygium cumini | Quercetin | [180,181,182] |
Thymus vulgaris | Caffeic and rosmarinic acids | [183] |
Triticum aestivum | Phytic acid, ferulic acid, sinapic, syringic, vanillic and p-coumaric acids | [184,185] |
Vitis vinifera | Malvidin, cyanidin, delphinidin, peonidin and petunidin, epigallocatechin etc. | [186,187] |
10.2. Applications of Phenolic Antioxidant/Antimicrobials
Over the last years, naturally occurring fruits, vegetables, herbs, spices, oils, and their extracts attract the attention of researchers as they are regarded as the ultimate sources of phenolic compounds. They have been tremendously utilized/applied by the food, cosmetics, and pharma industries for a better therapeutic efficacy and conservation of substances. Moreover, they are broadly available, reliable, and cheap with minimal toxic effects, which makes them superior to synthetic products in all aspects. Various applications of polyphenolic compounds [188,189,190,191,192,193] in the pharmaceutical, food, and cosmetics sectors have been summarized in Figure 8.
11. Permitted/Approved Preservatives
Preservatives are defined as synthetic chemical additives that increase the durability and prolong the shelf life of the product. Although preservatives are effective in preventing a microbial burden in the product, the risk of allergic reactions, sensitization, and other toxicological effects associated with their frequent use cannot be subsided. Preservatives are incorporated in a range of food, cosmetic, and pharmaceutical products, and are an indispensable part of our daily diet and lifestyle as well. Ideally, owing to their necessity in the product, we should either limit their use in the product or opt for natural alternatives, as is the need of the hour. As per European regulations (Directive 95/2/EC), officially recognized and only permitted preservatives have been set down in Annex four of the 7th amendment of the cosmetic directive, which is summarized in Table 6. The Codex Alimentarius Commission (Codex) was established by the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations to set global standards to ensure fair food trade practices. The Codex General Standard for Food Additives [194] (Codex Stan 192–1995, Revision, 2015) enlisted additional additives, preservatives, and antioxidants, permitted for food that has been thoroughly appraised by an international expert scientific committee, the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA), to develop specifications on food additives. According to Codex General Standard for Food Additives, a food additive is any substance (preservatives and antioxidants) that has been found acceptable given a green signal for use in foods, such as tertiary butyl hydroquinone (TBHQ), isopropyl citrate, dimethyl decarbonate and ferrous gluconate, etc. In the EU, every additive (preservative) assigned to a code begins with the letter E followed by a three-to-four-digit number. The numbering scheme is under the International Numbering System (INS). Antimicrobial preservatives should be chemically defined and designated by the Chemical Abstract Service Registry Number (RN-CAS) as determined by the Codex Alimentarius Committee [87].
Table 6.
INS Number | E Number | Preservative |
---|---|---|
200 | E200 | Sorbic acid |
201 | Sodium sorbate | |
202 | E202 | Potassium sorbate |
203 | Calcium sorbate | |
209 | Heptyl para-hydroxybenzoate | |
210 | E210 | Benzoic acid |
211 | E211 | Sodium benzoate |
212 | E212 | Potassium benzoate |
213 | E213 | Calcium benzoate |
214 | E214 | Ethyl p-hydroxybenzoate |
215 | E215 | Sodium ethyl p-hydroxybenzoate |
216 | Propyl p-hydroxybenzoate | |
217 | Sodium propyl p-hydroxybenzoate | |
218 | E218 | Methyl p-hydroxybenzoate |
219 | E219 | Sodium methyl p-hydroxybenzoate |
220 | E220 | Sulphur dioxide |
221 | E221 | Sodium sulphite |
222 | E222 | Sodium hydrogen sulphite |
223 | E223 | Sodium metabisulphite |
224 | E224 | Potassium metabisulphite |
225 | Potassium sulphite | |
226 | E226 | Calcium sulphite |
227 | E227 | Calcium hydrogen sulphite |
228 | E228 | Potassium hydrogen sulphite |
230 | Diphenyl | |
231 | Ortho-phenylphenol | |
232 | Sodium ortho-phenylphenol | |
233 | Thiabendazole | |
234 | E234 | Nisin |
235 | E235 | Natamycin (Pimaricin) |
236 | Formic acid | |
237 | Sodium formate | |
238 | Calcium formate | |
E239 | Hexamethylene tetramine | |
240 | Formaldehyde | |
241 | Gum guaiacum | |
E242 | Dimethyl dicarbonate | |
E243 | Ethyl lauryl arginate | |
E249 | Potassium nitrite | |
E250 | Sodium nitrite | |
E251 | Sodium nitrate | |
E252 | Potassium nitrate | |
260 | Acetic acid, glacial | |
261 | Potassium acetates | |
262 | Sodium acetates | |
263 | Calcium acetates | |
264 | Ammonium acetate | |
265 | Dehydroacetic acid (DHA) | |
266 | Sodium dehydroacetate | |
270 | Lactic acid | |
280 | E280 | Propionic acid |
281 | E281 | Sodium propionate |
282 | E282 | Calcium propionate |
283 | E283 | Potassium propionate |
E284 | Boric acid | |
E285 | Sodium tetraborate; borax | |
290 | Carbon dioxide | |
E1105 | Lysozyme | |
344 | Lecithin citrate | |
384 | Isopropyl citrates | |
386 | EDTA |
Amendments in Food Additives
After considering several opinions by the expert committee, FSSAI in its gazette notification adopted an amendment to the Food Safety and Standards (Food Products Standards and Food Additives) 7th Amendment Regulations, 2020, with regard to regulations 3.1 dated 16 September 2020, which came into force by 1 July 2021 [195,196]. Under Food Category System 6.2 and 7.2.1 as per the new regulations, the following changes have been introduced as given below in Table 7.
Table 7.
Food Additive | INS No. | Old Maximum Limits | Recommended Maximum Limits |
Inclusion/ Omission |
---|---|---|---|---|
Pimaricin (natamycin) | 235 | Omitted | ||
Sorbates | 200 | 2000 mg/kg | 1000 mg/kg | |
EDTA | 386 | 100 mg/kg | 50 mg/kg | |
Potassium iodate | Omitted | |||
Potassium bromated | Omitted |
After the consideration of the Scientific Opinion on the re-evaluation of sorbates as food additives/preservatives, the European regulations finally decided to adopt an amendment in Annexes II and III to Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008 and Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 231/2012 [197,198], by excluding calcium sorbate from the list of officially permitted food additives with the backdrop of lack of appropriate genotoxicity data, based on which calcium sorbate can no longer enjoy the status of being an authorized food additive.
Climbazole (CAS 38083-17-9) is a cosmetic preservative that has been used in various cosmetic preparations such as face creams, lotions, foot cream, rinse-off shampoos, and many others, at an allowed concentration of 0.5%. Experts from the Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) found that the use of climbazole at 0.5% in cosmetic products is not safe and may pose serious health issues to consumers (SCCS/1506/13, 2017). To ensure consumers’ safety, the European Commission amended the cosmetic regulations and decided to impose restrictions on the use of climbazole as a preservative in cosmetic products. Considering the harmful effects associated with the use of climbazole, Europe’s Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS), SCCS/1600/18, set new regulatory limits to climbazole for its safe use in cosmetic preparations [199,200]. This regulation took effect on 22 May 2019, while amendments to Annex V were applied from 27 November 2019. Currently, as per the new regulatory limits, the allowed maximum concentration has dropped down to 0.2% in face creams, hair lotions, and foot care products and 0.5% for rinse-off shampoo (Table 8). These restrictions were implemented for all new products as well as the products already available in the EU market containing climbazole.
Table 8.
Food Additive | Old Maximum Limits | Recommended Maximum Limits |
Inclusion/ Omission |
---|---|---|---|
Calcium sorbate | Omitted | ||
Climbazole | 0.5% | 0.2% | |
Hydroxyethoxyphenyl butanone (HEPB) | 0.7% w/v | New entry |
Hydroxyethoxyphenyl butanone (HEPB, CAS 569646-79-3), also known as ethyl zingerone, is intended to be used as a cosmetic preservative and has been a new entry to the family of authorized preservatives in cosmetic products [89]. In 2019, based on safety assessment studies, the SCCS recommends the inclusion or entry of HEPB in the list of approved preservatives. On 6 November 2019, HEPB was officially enlisted in Annex V of the European Cosmetic Regulation 1223/2009 [201] with the recommended safe maximum limit concentration of 0.7% w/v in all cosmetic products concerning eye irritation [200].
12. Unfair Practices in Trade
For holding a good market position globally, neck-to-neck competition can be seen among the brands and companies advertising their products. For ages advertising has been in practice, and companies spend a handsome amount of money just to expand their business globally by persuading consumers to buy the product [202]. Advertising through different mediums such as social media, print media, digital media, etc. provides a wider canvas to overhype a particular brand or product. Although we are progressing technologically very fast, we end up in a world where spurious realities are created by the media. Nowadays, advertising is one of the effective mediums of communication between manufacturers and consumers. It is a way to attract, connect, and capture the consumers at the other end with undeniable influence on their mindset, but becomes problematic if they are misleading in any way [203].
Today, advertising has become a necessary tool for producers to burgeon their business and for consumers to increase their awareness, to select the best out of the box [204]. Advertising is an act of selling the concept “what you see is sold” playing out with the consumer sentiments. The advertising industry is dodgy, indulged in unethical practices by running false campaigns for peddling an average product, poaching the common man with illusory wordplay [205]. Common men are vulnerable to advertising and are unceasingly bombarded with pseudo realities manufactured by very sophisticated mechanisms. Moreover, there are different means of the product packaging systems available in the market to ensure their safety. These packaging systems act as a barrier between the product and consumer as consumers do not have direct access to the facts of the product. In such circumstances, product labels are the only means of providing information about the hidden product. Before we discuss the technicalities of the matter, one must understand the meaning of “claim”. As per the Joint FAO/WHO Codex Alimentarius Commission, 1992, this claim is referred to as a message in any form that states or implies that a food has particular characteristics with regards to its quality, nutritive value, quantity, health functional food, etc. [206]. Today, many companies have adopted unethical/illegal practices to prop up their false claims to mislead consumers and to make large profits at the cost of their health, and these are under the lens [203]. Therefore, every nation appoints government officials to design and adopt policies comprised of laws, regulations, and guidelines that products need to comply with. In 2015, under the legislative framework, the Government of India appointed a self-regulatory body, the Advertising Standards Council of India (ASCI) arm that twists advertising agencies and coerces them to follow laws and regulations. ASCI analyzes and scrutinizes the advertising content and entertains the complaints against the advertisement, whether the advertisement builds any deceptive or exaggerated claim that may mislead the consumer in any way. It is a commitment to healthy and fair competition. In recent years, consumers have now become more aware of the toxic effects of synthetic chemicals on their health, therefore, they are inclined towards traditional natural alternatives being incorporated in the products. To comply with the elevating demand for natural alternatives, companies adopted tricky advertising strategies (Figure 9) to market their products to make an unfair profit [207]. An advertisement and label become deceptive or misleading if they bear a bogus claim as a part of a marketing strategy to advertise the product:
Other false claims include—hiding or misstating the number of ingredients, labeling claims of extraordinary health benefits, highlighting or overstating the nutrient value, using exaggerated claims such as best/perfect, delicious, etc.
13. Misleading Labeling and Advertising
Advertising may influence the thought process of the consumer both positively and negatively as well. The content is deemed to be negative, unethical, and unfair if it misleads consumers and represents an illusory picture of the product, making them believe that a particular product is superior to other rival products available in the market to promote the sale. Some unfair or deceptive practices based on exaggerated claims [205,208,209] are summarized as follows:
Falsely representing food with a name similar to the prescribed name of an oriental medicine so that consumers misperceive the food as a drug.
Incorrect representation of food with a mark to depict the food as a healthy functional food.
Labeling or advertising products as “Preservatives not added” and “Free of preservatives”.
Falsely representing names other than those defined under the Standards and Specifications for Food Additives announced by the Ministry of Foods and Drug Safety.
Purposely representing that goods are of a particular grade, quality, and standard.
Labeling or advertising 100% when the product contains ingredients other than the raw material specified on the label. For instance, 100% orange juice (containing citric acid and other acidity regulators).
Labeling or advertising food with effects or properties that it does not possess.
Labeling or advertising food bearing special characteristics regarding nutrient content.
As per European regulations on misleading advertising in Directive 2006/114/EC [210], misleading advertisements are deceptive based on unsubstantial and exaggerated claims that represent a false picture of the product and violate the customer’s right to know about the products they are purchasing. The sale of such a misbranded product is against the law. Misleading advertisements are a serious ill issue for society that needs to be addressed. Therefore, the advertising industry requires the following laws and regulations to ensure the credibility and authenticity of the common man [211,212].
14. Recent Trends in Preservation
Scores of preservatives, whether natural/synthetic, are used in various products available in the market. A clear trend towards mild substances can be seen, particularly organic acid-based preservatives are quite popular nowadays. Preservatives are generally incorporated to ensure the safety of the product but can deteriorate the product if used inadequately. Based on several reports on the risk of sensitization associated with the use of preservatives, the Scientific Committee on Consumer Products in Europe and the Cosmetic Ingredient Review in North America introduced changes in legislation to pose restrictions on their maximum permitted concentrations or even banned them in some cases [48,213]. Companies are now looking for new natural alternatives with the potential to live up to the expectations of both producers and consumers.
14.1. Controversial Preservatives
14.1.1. Parabens
Based on early assessments, parabens are classified among the oldest and most commonly used preservatives in various food, cosmetics, and pharmaceutical products. Parabens and their esters are generally used in topical formulations as they are chemically stable and have broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity [214,215]. In recent years, as far as safety is concerned, parabens have been the most criticized among other preservatives. Parabens are accused of causing various health issues such as skin sensitization, allergic dermatitis, endocrine disruption [216], estrogenic effects, interference with male reproductive functions, breast cancer [46], the development of malignant melanoma, gestational diabetes mellitus, etc. [217,218], and their usage in products will be questioned remain a long-lasting challenge. Darbre et al., identified the presence of different paraben esters in human breast tumor tissue samples [46]. Keeping in mind the adverse effects, consumer fear, market trends, and the inclination of consumers towards organic products, manufacturers were prompted to replace paraben or lower its limit concentration in their products [219]. Even some manufacturers set a new trend to write “Paraben-free” on the product label that flourishes in the market everywhere. It is noteworthy that the use of “preservative free” on the labels is EU compliant while “paraben free” is not. For the sake of the safety of both the product and the consumer, the use of preservatives has been subjected to certain restrictions [215]. After the thorough evaluation of parabens based on a cumulative study by the Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) of the European Commission, the use of parabens was restricted to lower concentration limits [220]. Based on pieces of evidence related to the toxicity of parabens, the FDA approved new limits for the use of parabens, i.e., 0.1% limit concentration in foods, 0.1% for solo, and 0.3% limit concentration for a blend of the compound in pharmaceuticals [221]. In cosmetics, the concentration limit was reduced from 0.4% to 0.14% and was prohibited in the case of children’s products [215,222,223]. In countries such as Denmark, the use of parabens is illegal and deemed to be unsafe, therefore, they were banned, but in other countries including India, the use of parabens is still legal [218,224]. In cosmetics, owing to their natural origin, parabens are preferentially replaced by phenolic compounds as they are gentle, non-irritating, and do not release formaldehyde.
14.1.2. Phenoxyethanol
Phenoxyethanol (122-99-6) is an ether and aromatic alcohol with a large antimicrobial spectrum against various bacterial strains and yeast. According to European Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety Cosmetics Regulation (EC 1223/2009) [222], phenoxyethanol is authorized as a safe preservative for all consumers including children when used at a maximum concentration of 1%. Nowadays, parabens have been largely replaced by phenoxyethanol in many cosmetic formulations [225]. Keeping in mind the elevating demand for natural ingredients by the consumer, the globally recognized cosmetic brand manufacturers took the criticism seriously and introduced synergistic blends of multi-functional natural ingredients in their products. They are all set to go completely paraben-free across the full product range shortly.
14.1.3. Formaldehyde Donors
Considering the allergic skin reactions caused by using of formaldehyde and formaldehyde-releasing preservatives (DMDM, hydantoin, imidazolidinyl urea, diazolidinyl urea, sodium hydroxymethyl glycinate, and quaternium-15) in various personal care products, the EU and GSO restricted their concentration limit to 0.2% w/w in all cosmetics products and 0.1% w/w for oral hygiene products. According to Annex VI of the Cosmetics Directive 76/768 EC and Gulf Technical Regulation for Safety Requirements of Cosmetics and Personal Care Products (GSO 1943/2016) [226], final products must enumerate with a word warning “contains formaldehyde” on their label containing formaldehyde or its releasers in the concentration exceeding the maximum allowable limit, i.e., 0.05% w/w [227].
14.2. Natural Preservatives
In recent years, the market trend has changed dramatically as per the consumer’s perception and acceptance of natural alternatives over synthetic ones. Consumers are interested in fresh and natural products with no added preservatives [228]. Demands have been pouring in from all quarters for natural, herbal, and organic products. In recent decades, manufacturers have adopted different efficacious methods of extending shelf life during commercialization and have gained relevance. In this context, bio-preservatives received considerable interest and have been exploited for their antimicrobial potential by researchers worldwide to extend their shelf life.
14.3. Nanotechnology in Food Preservation
In recent years, nanotechnology is the most active and fastest growing active research field with the unique ability to manipulate matter in nano dimensions and impart novel properties to the materials. Nanotechnology has numerous applications in various fields, but its role in food preservation is remarkable. Nanotechnology deals with the synthesis of various nanomaterials of different dimensions such as nanoparticles, quantum dots, nanorods, nanotubes, nanocapsules, nanoemulsions, etc. [229,230]. Owing to their physicochemical nature and antimicrobial potential, nanomaterials can offer a solution in food packaging and preservation [231,232]. In functional foods, bioactive components such as carbohydrates, proteins, and vitamins, etc. are susceptible to microbial deterioration, which ultimately leads to the degradation of food. Nanoencapsulation protects the biologically active components by providing a protective barrier against moisture and gas exchange that enables the retarding of their chemical degradation, provides stability, and facilitates their controlled release. The nanoparticles are responsible for developing mechanical and heat-resistant properties that eventually prolong the shelf life [233]. Food ingredients are prone to degradation during processing and oxidative deterioration during storage, therefore, efficient packaging systems are required to overcome this problem. When we talk about an efficient packaging system, the packing material is of paramount significance for maintaining the quality of foodstuffs. The packaging concept has been introduced to serve important functions such as product containment, presentation and convenience, preservation, quality protection, and to provide storage history of the concerned product. Food packaging provides a protective barrier to fresh fruits and vegetables against air, light, moisture, dryness, etc., thus playing a critical role in the preservation of foodstuffs. Nano packaging includes “active”, “smart”, and intelligent food packaging systems [234] such as biodegradable nanocomposites, nanoclays, and nano edible coatings on the food surface with excellent mechanical strength and barrier properties that effectively improve food durability and contribute to the shelf life of the food product. Intelligent food packaging with nano sensors to monitor the food for pathogen detection and alert consumers to the safety status of food are now in practice [235]. Edible coatings and films on the food surface are meant to be consumed with packaged food. It becomes necessary that the ingredients used in the packaging should be classified as GRAS. The applications of various nanoparticles (NPs) and nanomaterials have been briefly summarized in Table 9.
Table 9.
Nanomaterial/ Nanoparticles |
Definition | Matrix | Applications/Activity | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|
Ag | Particles of matter fluctuating between 1 and 100 nm in diameter display distinctive properties | Poultry meat, fruits, and vegetables such as apples, grapes, tomatoes, kiwi, asparagus, etc. | 1. Antimicrobial agents in food packaging. 2. Preservation of storage containers and refrigerators. 3. As a health supplement. 4. Active food packaging. |
[230,236,237,238,239,240] |
ZnO | Orange juice, apple juice, peaches, mango, tomato, poultry meat, etc. | 1. Antimicrobial agents, as a nutritional additive in food packaging. 2. Increase the shelf life. 3. Enhancing the quality of cucumber, increasing zinc, iron, and carotene content. |
[230,241,242,243,244,245,246,247,248,249] | |
TiO2 | Strawberry, soft cheese, Chinese jujube, etc. | Food additives for storage containers and food packaging. | [230,237,240,243,245,246] | |
Silver oxide | Apple slices | Retard microbial spoilage | [230,240,243,247,248] | |
Nanocomposites | Multiphase materials consist of two or more components in which one of the components has nanoscale dimensions to obtain the best properties of each component | Beans, pear, mushrooms, carrot, cheese, tomatoes, fresh fruits and vegetables, etc. | 1. Polylactic acid (PLA)/nano clay/nanocellulose hybris nanocomposite offer a reduction in oxygen transmission rate and water vapor transmission rate. 2. Biodegradable nanocomposite films (dye/clay/PLA) applied in food packaging offers excellent barrier properties. |
[249,250,251,252] |
Nanoclay (natural nanolayer structures) |
Nanoparticles of layered mineral silicates (phyllosilicates) of nanoscale dimensions | Cheese, processed meat, fruit juices, milk products, etc. | 1. Intercalation of drugs (such as sildenafil, aripiprazole) in montmorillonite (MMT) used to improve organoleptic properties. 2. Sepiolite clay efficiently applied in active food packaging, enhances antimicrobial and antioxidant properties when incorporated with essential clove oil. 3. By loading Vitamin A in sepiolite (SPT), its oxidative degradation can be prevented. 4. Cefazolin loaded in chitosan/PVA/SPT hybrid hydrogel films showed a wider zone of inhibition against Bacillus cereus bacterium. 5. Drug–clay complex increases the dissolution as well as drug release rate. For e.g., Vitamin B1 loaded montmorillonite (MMT). |
[252,253,254,255,256,257,258,259] |
Nanoemulsions | Nanosized colloidal systems designed to improve drug delivery systems | Encapsulation of bioactive components such as resveratrol, probiotics, nutraceutical, PUFAs, flavored nanoemulsions with improved curcumin digestibility. | 1. Encapsulation of lipophilic components such as vitamins. 2. Beeswax–starch emulsion, o/w applied as an edible coating in food preservation. 3. Nanoemulsion powder with turmeric extract, o/w enhances the shelf life of fortified milk for 3 weeks. 4. Sapindus extract and basil oil, o/w with antimicrobial activity against food pathogens. 5. Kemira nanogel enhances skin smoothness. 6. Cumin seed oil, corn oil, whey protein with antifungal activity in food preservation. |
[260,261,262,263,264] |
DNA biochips, electronic tongue (Nano sensors) |
Sensitive device that operates at the nanoscale level to detect and transmit chemical, biological, and physical information to the macroscopic level. | Wine characterization, fruits, meat products | 1. To detect pathogens and toxins in foodstuffs. 2. To monitor the freshness of foodstuffs. 3. Incorporated into packaging materials for monitoring product spoilage. |
[265,266,267] |
Nano edible coating and films | A thin layer of edible materials is applied on the surface of an edible product to preserve it from the external environment. | Bread, frozen food, pizza, cakes, meat products, ice creams, fruits (apple, grapes, papaya, mangoes), potato, tomato, broccoli, etc. | 1. To regulate humidity, oxidation, and gaseous exchange to preserve the foodstuffs against invading microbes. 2. As packaging materials. 3. Pathogen inhibitor. 4. Food preservation. |
[236,240,268,269,270] |
14.4. Preservation without Preservatives
When natural food is processed, by using any means, some chemicals are added, which ultimately results in the loss of its nutritional value. The processed food needs to be consumed within a limited time as many additives were added during its processing, otherwise, the food will begin to deteriorate. The deteriorated food affects the color, taste, appearance, smell, stability, and shelf life of foods badly and diminishes their nutritional value and quality characteristics [271]. To protect these properties, several preservatives are commonly used to keep the food fresh and safe from spoiling for a longer period. The inclination of consumers toward natural additives is increasing gradually [272]. Currently, researchers are left with no other option and have been rigorously looking for incorporating different additives derived from natural sources in the products. Today, we can easily find products in the market with a label indicating “No Added Preservatives” or “100% Natural”. Well, it is not always necessary to add preservatives to the finished product. There are some conditions where preservatives are not required to be added anymore, such as when there is a lack of water, when the ingredients present in the formulation are self-preserving due to their antimicrobial capabilities, when preparations were created in a single batch and are supposed to be consumed immediately in no time, and when the pH of the medium is such that it will not stand the microbial population easily, i.e., either <3 or >9.
An alternative strategy to be exercised when preservatives are indispensable in pharmaceutical preparations is to prepare a single dose and use it instantly or devise a limited amount meant to be consumed within a short period. This way, the use of preservatives in pharmaceutical preparations can be contraindicated [273]. Although fruit juices of different brands with added preservatives are available in the market, it is always better to consume freshly prepared fruit juices to avail the maximum benefits. Otherwise, carbohydrates present in the juices lead to the formation of Maillard browning products [274,275]. The premature spoilage of cosmetics products can be minimized by disinfecting the working space and containers properly, making products in small batches, storing them in a refrigerator at low temperatures, using a spatula (instead of a finger) to use the product, avoiding exposure to moisture and sunlight, etc.
14.5. Self-Preserving System
Microbial contamination is one of the major inevitable issues that needs to be addressed. Preservatives are often added to control microbial bioburden, i.e., prevent product deterioration by inhibiting microbial proliferation and sufficiently extending the shelf life of the product. The use of preservatives is found to be associated with many toxicological effects; therefore, it is preferred to add preservatives at concentration levels as low as possible. However, the inadequate level of preservatives is again of no use as it gives room to microbial contamination and makes the product susceptible to deterioration. To achieve preservation without adding preservatives, reliable and effective methods for extending the shelf life must be considered, such as the use of bio-preservatives that offer better packaging formats [276]. An alternative approach to achieve the balance between the antimicrobial efficacy and toxicological effects of antimicrobial preservatives is to include multifunctional components in the formulation, which enhance the overall antimicrobial activity of the formulation in addition to their primary function. Self-preserving systems or formulations come into the picture, in which the traditional single chemical preservatives have been replaced by other ingredients of the formulation with strong antimicrobial properties to combat microbial growth [277]. In cosmetic products, many cosmetic ingredients other than preservatives, such as alcohol, antioxidants, biomimetic phospholipids, chelating agents, fatty acids, essential oil, and surfactants, are found to possess antimicrobial properties. Ophthalmic formulations, which are generally formulated as isotonic buffered solutions, also include multifunctional ingredients in the composition to enhance the overall antimicrobial activity of the formulation. However, these multifunctional ingredients have not yet been recognized as preservatives by European regulations and are not listed in annex four of the 7th amendment of the Cosmetic Directive among officially permitted preservatives [278,279]. The production of self-preserving systems or formulations is based on the principles of “Hurdle technology” which involves the intelligent and careful combination of multifunctional ingredients, with mild individual impact, to minimize or eliminate the use of toxic chemical preservatives [280]. The principles of self-preserving technology involve a synergistic combination of preserving factors or hurdles to keep a constant check on the microbial populations and offer high quality and safety. The stringent maintenance of aseptic conditions through the strict adherence to GMP requirements, airless packing to prevent the introduction of outside microorganisms to improve preservation, and water activity is decreased to discourage the microbial growth, bio-preservatives, and pH control to decrease or minimize the proliferation rate of microbes and multipurpose antibacterial components [281]. Below are listed some multifunctional ingredients with antimicrobial properties (Table 10) [279]:
Table 10.
S.No. | Multifunctional Ingredients | Examples |
---|---|---|
1 | Surfactants | Anionic (Stearic acid) Cationic (cetyl pyridinium chloride) Non-ionic (propylene and ethylene oxide) |
2 | Fatty acids and esters | Caprylic acid, capric acid, heptanoic acid, etc. |
3 | Biomimetic phospholipids | Lecithin |
4 | Antioxidants as preservatives | BHA, BHT, propyl gallate etc. |
5 | Aroma chemicals as preservatives | Spices and essential oils (oil of rose, lemon, clove, etc.) |
6 | Chelating agents as preservatives | EDTA, citric acid, phytic acid, etc. |
7 | Fragrance Ingredients | Benzyl acetate, phenethyl alcohol, linalool |
14.6. Pulse Electric Field (PEF)
In recent years, the non-thermal processing technique, pulse electric field (PEF) emerged as an effective and potential tool in the field of food preservation and has gained popularity over conventional thermal methods of food preservation. Studies revealed that this technology enables the inactivation of microorganisms causing spoilage of the food product [282]. Wouters et al. reported that this food preservation technology involves the application of short high-voltage pulses of electricity with a short duration ranging from micro to milliseconds, generating an electric field resulting in microbial inactivation of the product (fruits, vegetables, juice, and dairy products) placed between the electrodes at a low temperature, which disrupts the cell membrane matrix of the food, thereby extending its shelf life [283]. PEF technology has a wide range of applications in various food products such as watermelon [284], blueberries [285], apple juice [286,287], red beet [288], olive paste [289], and clover sprout [290]. This technique aims to provide high-quality food to the consumer with minimal detrimental influence on the food quality. This technology is superior in keeping the sensory, nutritional, and physical attributes of the food intact [291]. Owing to its low temperature and short treatment time, the PEF technique exhibits immense potential for shelf-life extension in addition to its microbial decontamination properties [292].
15. Legislation for Food, Cosmetics, and Pharmaceutical Products around the Globe
Every nation needs effective legislation to regulate and control the formulation of various products by imposing laws and setting up guidelines for ensuring the safety of both products and consumers as well (Figure 10). Based on the safety evaluations, some restriction limits and conditions are legally being imposed by regulatory bodies or agencies throughout the world for the use of additives in the product. It is legally required that preservatives must be used in compliance with the regulations specified in the legislation to certify the safety of the finished product. Several ICH guidelines should be taken into account for the inclusion of antioxidant and antimicrobial preservatives in the product. In the EU, every additive (preservative) assigned to a code begins with the letter E followed by a three-to-four-digit number. The numbering scheme is by the International Numbering System (INS). Antimicrobial preservatives should be chemically defined and designated by the Chemical Abstract Service Registry Number (RN-CAS) as determined by the Codex Alimentarius Committee [87].
15.1. Cosmetic Legislation
Cosmetic goods have a large global market around the world. Effective legislation is required to regulate the market, trade, quality of products, and safety of the user. Therefore, every nation has legislation run by regulatory authorities, having its own rules and regulations, to regulate the overall activities. Instead of understanding the regulatory aspects in different countries, we need to understand how these regulatory bodies function [293]. Among the recommended regulations worldwide, the legislation of the USA, Europe, and India receives considerable interest and their various regulatory aspects are summarized in Table 11. In the US FDA, as per the FD&C Act, a product may be regarded either as a drug, cosmetic, or (in contrast to the position in the EU) as both a drug and a cosmetic. Both the FDA and EU declare that cosmetics need not be sterile and contain specified microorganisms within restricted limits, which may not influence the product characteristics [294,295,296]. Council Directive 1223/2009 EC of Europe listed prohibited substances [297], which cannot be a part of the formulation of a cosmetic product, in Annex II, while regulated substances in which restriction limits are set for certain allowed substances, especially preservatives, are included in Annex VI. In India, cosmetic goods are regulated under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940, and the Drugs and Cosmetics Rules of 1945, in association with the Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) to set the standards.
Table 11.
Contents | India | USA | Europe |
---|---|---|---|
Governing authority | Central Drugs Standard Control Organization (CDSCO) | Food Drug Administration (FDA) | European Union Regulatory Authority (EUMA) |
Rules and regulations | Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940, and Rules 1945 Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) |
Food, Drug & Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act) |
Council Directive 76/768/EEC, 1976 Revised Regulation EC 1223/2009 |
Purpose | BIS regulates the standards for cosmetics products described under Schedule “S” of the Drugs and Cosmetics Rules 1945 | Enforcement of laws governing the marketing of cosmetics prohibits the marketing of adulterated or misbranded cosmetics in the market | Provides comprehensive categorization of cosmetic products on the basis of function, zone of application, and product constitution |
Cosmetics | Any article envisaged to be poured, rubbed, sprinkled, or sprayed on, or introduced into, or otherwise applied to the human body or any part thereof for cleansing, alluring, beautifying, or changing the appearance, and entails any article intended for use as a component of a cosmetic. | Any article envisaged to be poured, rubbed, sprinkled, or sprayed on, or introduced into, or otherwise applied to the human body or any part thereof for cleansing, alluring, beautifying, or changing the appearance, and entails any article intended for use as a component of any such articles; except that such term shall not include soap. | Any substance or preparation intended to be placed in contact with the various external parts of the human body or with the teeth and the mucous membranes of the oral cavity with a view exclusively or mainly to cleaning them, perfuming them, changing their appearance and/or correcting body odors and/or protecting them or keeping them in good condition. |
Registration | Required | Through Voluntary Cosmetic Registration Program (VCRP) (Not mandatory) |
For market authorization, an applicant must provide a degree of information in the application form. |
Pre-market approval | Required under state government licensing | Not required | Not required |
GMP compliance | Yes | Yes Not mandatory |
Yes ISO 22716 is the reference guide to GMP implementation and assessment |
Level of microbial contamination | Follows the guidelines of the Personal Care Products Council (PCPC), formerly the Cosmetic, Toiletry and Fragrance Association (CTFA) | Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) Guideline “SCCS Notes of Guidance for the Testing of Cosmetic Ingredients and their Safety Evaluation, 9th revision” | |
Post-marketing survey and Reporting system | No specific guidelines | Follows Voluntary Cosmetic Regulation Program (VCRP) reporting system | No specific guidelines |
References | [298,299,300] | [24,294,295,296,298,301,302,303] | [24,222,298,299,304,305] |
15.2. Food Legislation
Compelling food grades and governing systems are mandatory to unify quality in every facet of food production and service to encourage the production of safe and healthier food, aid advancement in international trade, and prohibit the sale of deteriorated or unsafe/fraudulent food. Therefore, the legislation needs to be updated from time to time (Table 12). Food standards are regulated at different levels such as company standards, national standards, regional standards, and international standards (Codex Alimentarius Commission (CAC), International Organization for Standardization (IOS), and World Trade Organization (WTO)). Food Product Standards and Food Additives (FSS) Regulations 2011 defines “preservative” as a substance capable of retarding the deterioration process of the food item. The careful implementation of laws formed by regulatory bodies reassures impartial trade practices through adherence to the basic provisions of the food law, which avoids unfair competition. The EU defines different categories of food additives and sets a list of authorized food additives and their condition of use. The Codex Alimentarius Commission (CAC) provides a collection of various food safety standards adopted internationally. The CAC has become the single international platform, officially recognized by WTO, for different countries to develop national standards. The CAC mainly focuses on ensuring fair food trade practices and consumer health protection. Legislative bodies restrict the number of additives/preservatives to the lowest possible level allowed to be incorporated in the food product to execute its yearning effect. The chemical preservative is generally recognized as safe (GRAS) if it is covered by food additive regulations, prescribing conditions of safe use [306,307].
Table 12.
Contents | India | USA | Europe |
---|---|---|---|
Governing authority | FSSAI | Food Drug Administration (FDA) | European Union Regulatory Authority (EUMA) |
Rules and regulations | Food Safety and Standards Act (FSSA), 2006 Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) |
Food, Drug & Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act) | Directive 95/2/EC |
Purpose | For laying down standards for food and to regulate their manufacture, storage, distribution, sale, and import, to ensure availability of safe and wholesome food for human consumption and advancement in international trade | FDA’s Centre for Food Safety & Applied Nutrition (CFSAN) have regulatory control by laying down standards and policies to prevent gross adulteration and contamination for ensuring the safety of food | Establishment and effective functioning of the internal market, health, safety, environmental protection, and consumers protection |
Features | BIS deals with the standardization of food products and runs a voluntary certification scheme known as the “ISI” mark for processed foods | Authorized three kinds of food standards—identity, quality, and fill with container | Provides scientific advice and technical support for farming legislation and policies having a direct or indirect impact on food and food safety |
Additive/ preservative |
As per amendment regulation, any substance that is capable of inhibiting, retarding, or arresting the process of fermentation, acidification or other deterioration of food but does not include: any permitted coloring matter; common salt (sodium chloride); lecithin, sugars or tocopherols; nicotinic acid or its amide |
Preservatives are described as food additives that are intentionally added to the foodstuff that become a component of the foodstuff, to prolong its shelf life by preventing microbial contamination | |
Pre-market approval | Required | Required | Required |
Food safety & management systems |
Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) Good Handling Practices (GHP) Hazard Analysis Critical Control Points (HACCP) |
Require proof of Safety review GRAS is an American Food and Drug Administration (FDA) assignment that a concoction or substance added to food is viewed as protected by specialists | |
References | [195,308,309,310,311] | [312,313] | [197,199,314,315] |
15.3. Pharmaceutical Legislation
Earlier the additives were assumed to be a passive part of the formulation. Based on several reports, these assumptions were put to an end when a chemical group of additives was found to interact with other ingredients of the formulation showing toxic effects. Preservatives form an indispensable part of the formulation; they have to be used in the right proportion so that they do not dominate the pharmacological action of other active ingredients. National pharmacopeias depict quality prerequisites for pharmaceutical additives. Pharmaceutical regulations comprise legal, administrative, and technical measures to ensure the safety and efficacy of the drug. To discharge their duties effectively, regulatory authorities put a great emphasis on the manufacturing of pharmaceutical products to maintain high standards without compromising the quality, efficacy, purity, and safety of the finished product at every step. The objective of drug regulatory legislation is to lay down standards for regulating pharmaceutical products through the establishment of a drug regulatory authority. The International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) provides a platform that gathers the regulatory authorities of different countries (Table 13) and experts from the pharmaceutical industry to analyze various aspects of product registration. The ICH issues guidelines on the technical requirements for drug products containing new ingredients and is subjected to revision from time to time to harmonize with the lines of the WHO and US FDA protocols for maintaining regulatory obligations to protect public health [316].
Table 13.
Contents | India | USA | Europe |
---|---|---|---|
Governing authority | Central Drug Standard Control Organization (CDSCO) headed by Drugs Controller General of India (DCGI), Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India | Food Drug Administration (FDA) | European Union Regulatory Authority (EUMEA) |
Rules and regulations | Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 and Rules 1945—to regulate import, manufacture, licensing, testing, distribution, and sale of the drug in India. The Pharmacy Act, 1948—to regulate the pharmacy profession in India Drugs and Magic Remedies (Objectionable Advertisement) Act,1954 |
Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act) |
Directive 2001/82/EC (Veterinary medicinal products) Directive 2001/83/EC (medicinal products for human use) |
Purpose | To regulate import, manufacture, distribution, sale, clinical trials, market authorization, and post-market surveillance of drugs in India | To regulate import, manufacture, distribution, and sale of drugs | Provides a legal framework for authorization, manufacture, and distribution of a drug in the EU |
Drug | Chemical substance which alters the whole-body function and has the potential for misuse | Defines drugs as “articles intended for use in the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease and articles (other than food) intended to affect the structure or any function of the body of man or other animals” | Pharmaceutical preparations are defined as medicinal products consisting of active substances that may contain excipients, formulated into a dosage form suitable for the intended use |
Additive/ Preservative |
Any chemical or natural substance including fumigants capable of inhibiting or retarding the microbial growth | Any inactive fixings that are purposefully added to the therapeutic and diagnostic items, however it is not anticipated that they would apply remedial impacts at the planned dosage, regardless of the way that they may act to improve item delivery that presents well-being data concerning the correct and now proposed level of introduction, exposure time, or route of administration | Novel additives are described as the substances that are introduced for the first time in a formulation in addition to the active drug component or may be administered through a new route administration New additives are treated as a new entity or drug in the EU |
Licensing/ Authorization |
Required | Required | Required |
Safety & management systems |
Schedule M—GMP and requirement specifications of factory premises, plant and equipment for pharmaceutical products. Schedule T—GMP specifications for the manufacture of Ayurveda, Siddha, and Unani medicines. Schedule Y—specifications for clinical trials, import, and manufacture of new drugs |
FDA issued guidelines for new additives entitled “Non-Clinical Studies for the Safety Evaluation of Pharmaceutical Excipients” to establish the safety of dosage forms | IPEC Europe issued guidelines for evaluating the safety of new additives entitled “Guideline on additives in the dossier for application for marketing authorization of a medicinal product”. Documentation on every single novel additive is required on the principle of the CPMP Guideline (Chemistry of New Active Substances) |
Regulatory aspects | GCP guidelines in accordance with WHO guidelines and ICH requirements for good clinical practices | FDA takes ICH safety testing direction papers for leading safety tests | European Medicines Agency (EMA) has established that pharmaceutical companies must follow GMP procedures to ensure the quality standards of medicinal products |
References | [317,318] | [319,320] | [321,322,323] |
16. Conclusions
It is now evident that the consumption of natural foods containing a good amount of phenolic compounds proves to be beneficial for human health as they help in minimizing the risk of some serious ailments. Polyphenolic compounds are excellent antioxidants and bio-preservatives, which made the researchers curious to explore their immense bioactive potential and are found to be useful in a wide variety of applications. Synthetic preservatives are also able to sufficiently extend the shelf life of the perishable product, although they have been reported to have many side effects with harmful impacts on our health. Keeping this in mind, we encourage the use of preservatives made from natural plant products rather than synthetic ones. As far as food items are concerned, it is always better to consume fresh food free of preservatives, if at all possible. In an attempt to rugby-tackle illegal or deceptive practices based on unsubstantial and exaggerated claims that represent a false picture of the products, regulatory agencies posed restriction limits on the use of additives around the globe to take control over these outrageous misleading advertisements and protect the common man from being duped.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, P.R. (Priyanka Rathee), R.S., P.R. (Pooja Rathee), S.K., N.R. and A.K.; drafting the manuscript, S.K., A.K. and E.K.A.; review and editing the paper: A.K., E.K.A., G.T. and E.S.-S.; revising, A.K., E.K.A., G.T. and E.S.-S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Funding Statement
This research received no external funding.
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
References
- 1.Carstensen J.T., Rhodes C. Drug stability, revised, and expanded: Principles and practices. Inf. Health Care. 2000;213:223. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Khatkar A., Nanda A., Narasimhan B. Preservatives-associated problems and possible alternatives. Curr. Trends Biotechnol. 2012;2012:100–120. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Anand S.P., Sati N. Artificial preservatives and their harmful effects: Looking toward nature for safer alternatives. Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Res. 2013;4:2496. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Yoshioka S., Stella V.J. Stability of Drugs and Dosage Form. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2002;54:273–288. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Aulton M.E., Taylor K.M. The Design and Manufacture of Medicines. Elsevier Health Sciences: Churchill Livingstone; Edinburgh, Scotland: 2013. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Singh Y. Martin’s Physical Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences. Department of Pharmaceutics Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey; New Brunswick, NJ, USA: 2006. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Attwood D., Rolland I.P. Chemical kinetics and drug stability. Mod. Pharm. 2009;1:221–270. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Gokoglu N. Novel natural food preservatives and applications in seafood preservation: A review. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2019;99:2068–2077. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.9416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Pezeshk S., Seyed M.O., Alireza A. Effect of plant antioxidant and antimicrobial compounds on the shelf-life of seafood-a review. Czech J. Food Sci. 2015;33:195–203. doi: 10.17221/593/2014-CJFS. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Zani F., Minutello A., Maggi L., Mazza P. Evaluation of preservative effectiveness in pharmaceutical products: The use of a wild strain of Pseudomonas cepacian. J. Appl. Microbiol. 1997;83:322–326. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.1997.00231.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Khatkar A., Arun N., Balasubramanian N. Evaluation of preservative effectiveness of ferulic acid derivatives in Aluminium Hydroxide Gel-USP. Int. J. Pharma. Sci. Res. 2013;4:2721–2726. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Gyawali R., Salam A. Natural products as antimicrobial agents. Food Control. 2014;46:412–429. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2014.05.047. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Loss C.R., Hotchkiss J.H. Inhibition of Microbial Growth by Low-Pressure and Ambient Pressure Gases. Marcel Dekker; New York, NY, USA: 2002. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Himoudy I. Preservatives and their role in Pharma and Clinical Research. Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Scient. Res. 2016;2:68–85. doi: 10.25141/2471-6782-2016-4.0134. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Remize F. The Microbiological Quality of Food: Foodborne Spoilers. Elsevier; Cambridge, UK: 2017. pp. 99–120. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kong F., Singh R.P. The Stability and Shelf Life of Food. Woodhead Publishing; Cambridge, UK: 2016. Chemical Deterioration and Physical Instability of Foods and Beverages; pp. 43–76. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Díaz-Montes E., Castro-Muñoz R. Edible films and coatings as food-quality preservers: An overview. Foods. 2021;10:249. doi: 10.3390/foods10020249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Shaikh S.M., Doijad R.C., Shete A.S., Sankpal P.S. A Review on: Preservatives used in Pharmaceuticals and impacts on Health. Pharma. Tutor. 2016;4:25–34. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Brul S., Coote P. Preservative agents in foods: Mode of action and microbial resistance mechanisms. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 1999;50:1–17. doi: 10.1016/S0168-1605(99)00072-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Meyer B.K., Ni A., Hu B., Shi L. Antimicrobial preservative use in parenteral products: Past and present. J. Pharmaceut. Sci. 2007;96:3155–3167. doi: 10.1002/jps.20976. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Rico D., Martin-Diana A.B., Barat J.M., Barry-Ryan C. Extending and measuring the quality of fresh-cut fruit and vegetables: A review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2007;18:373–386. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2007.03.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Varraso R., Camargo C.A. Processed meat consumption and lung health: More evidence for harm. Eur. Respir. J. 2014;43:943–946. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00228213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Etemadi A., Sinha R., Ward M.H., Graubard B.I., Inoue-Choi M., Dawsey S.M., Abnet C.C. Mortality from different causes associated with meat, heme iron, nitrates, and nitrites in the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study: Population based cohort study. BMJ. 2017;357:j1957. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j1957. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Halla N., Fernandes I.P., Heleno S.A., Costa P., Boucherit-Otmani Z., Boucherit K., Rodrigues A.E., Ferreira I.C.F.R., Barreiro M.F. Cosmetics preservation: A review on present strategies. Molecules. 2018;23:1571. doi: 10.3390/molecules23071571. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Barel A.O., Paye M., Maibach H. Handbook of Cosmetic Science and Technology. CRC Press; Boca Raton, FL, USA: 2014. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Siemer E. Preparations for Cleansing and Caring for Blemished Skin. In: Umbach W., editor. Cosmetics and Toiletries-Development, Production and Use. Ellis Horwood; New York, NY, USA: 1991. pp. 124–128. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Sedlewicz L.B. Cosmetic preservatives: Friend or foe? Skinmed. J. 2005;4:98–100. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-9740.2005.03965.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Bilal M., Mehmood S., Iqbal H.M.N. The beast of beauty: Environmental and health concerns of toxic components in cosmetics. Cosmetics. 2020;7:13. doi: 10.3390/cosmetics7010013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 29.De Groot A.C., White I.R., Flyvholm M.A., Lensen G., Coenraads P.J. Formaldehyde-releasers in cosmetics: Relationship to formaldehyde contact allergy: Part 1. Characterization, frequency and relevance of sensitization, and frequency of use in cosmetics. Contact Dermat. 2010;62:2–17. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2009.01615.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Anusree V., Rasheed S.P., Mohammed B.K.P., Thasleena V.P., Parvathy S.L., Khais M. Identification and quantification of DMDM Hydantoin in selected shampoos. Der Pharma Chemica. 2020;12:31–35. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Russell K., Jacob S.E. Sodium hydroxymethylglycinate. Dermatitis. 2010;21:109–110. doi: 10.2310/6620.2010.09079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Borisova-Jan L., Jönsson S., Fransson D., Tammela M., Johansson M. Screening Procedure for Determination of Preservatives in Commercial Skin-Care Products. Läkemedelsverket, The Swedish Medicines Agency; Uppsala, Sweden: 2011. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Siti Z. Hazardous ingredients in cosmetics and personal care products and health concern: A review. J. Public Health Res. 2015;5:7. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Ho C.Y., Wu M.C., Lan M.Y., Tan C.T., Yang A.H. In vitro effects of preservatives in nasal sprays on human nasal epithelial cells. Am. J. Rhinol. 2008;22:125–129. doi: 10.2500/ajr.2008.22.3154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Świercz R., Hałatek T., Wąsowicz W., Kur B., Grzelińska Z., Majcherek W. Pulmonary irritation after inhalation exposure to benzalkonium chloride in rats. Int. J. Occup. Med. Environ. Health. 2008;21:157–163. doi: 10.2478/v10001-008-0020-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Xiong C., Chen D., Liu J., Liu B., Li N., Zhou Y., Liang X., Ma P., Ye C., Ge J., et al. A rabbit dry eye model induced by topical medication of a preservative benzalkonium chloride. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2008;49:1850–1856. doi: 10.1167/iovs.07-0720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Mullapudi S., Siletzky R.M., Kathariou S. Heavy-metal and benzalkonium chloride resistance of Listeria monocytogenes isolates from the environment of turkey-processing plants. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2008;74:1464–1468. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02426-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Ferk F., Mišík M., Hoelzl C., Uhl M., Fuerhacker M., Grillitsch B., Parzefall W., Narseyan A., Micieta K., Grummt T., et al. Benzalkonium chloride (BAC) and dimethyldioctadecyl-ammonium bromide (DDAB), two common quaternary ammonium compounds, cause genotoxic effects in mammalian and plant cells at environmentally relevant concentrations. Mutagenesis. 2007;22:363–370. doi: 10.1093/mutage/gem027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Hagele T.J., Mazerik J.N., Gregory A., Kaufman B., Magalang U., Kuppusamy M.L., Marsh C.B., Kuppusamy P., Parinandi N.L. Mercury activates vascular endothelial cell phospholipase D through thiols and oxidative stress. Int. J. Toxicol. 2007;26:57–69. doi: 10.1080/10915810601120509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Dracopoulos A., Dixon D.G., Jones L.W., Sivak J.G., Bantseev V. In vitro assessment of medical device toxicity: Interactions of benzalkonium chloride with silicone-containing and p-HEMA–containing hydrogel contact lens materials. Eye Contact Lens. 2007;33:26–37. doi: 10.1097/01.icl.0000229775.17844.3f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Deutschle T., Porkert U., Reiter R., Keck T., Riechelmann H. In vitro genotoxicity and cytotoxicity of benzalkonium chloride. Toxicol. Vitro. 2006;20:1472–1477. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2006.07.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Baudouin C., Labbé A., Liang H., Pauly A., Brignole-Baudouin F. Preservatives in eyedrops: The good, the bad and the ugly. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 2010;29:312–334. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2010.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Suzuki D. The “Dirty Dozen” ingredients investigated in the David Suzuki Foundation Survey of chemicals in cosmetics. Backgrounder. 2010;2010:1–15. [Google Scholar]
- 44.Sasseville D. Hypersensitivity to preservatives. Dermatol. Ther. 2004;17:251–263. doi: 10.1111/j.1396-0296.2004.04028.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Fan X., Kubwabo C., Rasmussen P., Jones-Otazo H. Simultaneous quantitation of parabens, triclosan, and methyl triclosan in indoor house dust using solid phase extraction and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. J. Environ. Monitoring. 2010;12:1891–1897. doi: 10.1039/c0em00189a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Darbre P.D., Aljarrah A., Miller W.R., Coldham N.G., Sauer M.J., Pope G.S. Concentrations of parabens in human breast tumours. J. Appl. Toxicol. 2004;24:5–13. doi: 10.1002/jat.958. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Tavares R.S., Martins F.C., Oliveira P.J., Ramalho-Santos J., Peixoto F.P. Parabens in male infertility-Is there a mitochondrial connection? Reprod. Toxicol. 2009;27:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2008.10.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Lundov M.D., Moesby L., Zachariae C., Johansen J.D. Contamination versus preservation of cosmetics: A review on legislation, usage, infections, and contact allergy. Contact Dermat. 2009;60:70–78. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2008.01501.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Lee J.D., Lee J.Y., Kwack S.J., Shin C.Y., Jang H.J., Kim H.Y., Kim M.K., Seo D.W., Lee B.M., Kim K.B. Risk assessment of triclosan, a cosmetic preservative. Toxicol. Res. 2019;35:137–154. doi: 10.5487/TR.2019.35.2.137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Davison J., Maillard J.Y., Pagès J.M. Opinion on Triclosan–Antimicrobial Resistance. European Union; Brussels, Belgium: 2010. [Google Scholar]
- 51.Silva E.A., Bosco M.R.M., Lozano R.R., Latini A.C.P., de Souza V.N.B. High rate of sensitization to Kathon CG, detected by patch tests in patients with suspected allergic contact dermatitis. An. Bras. De Dermatol. 2020;95:94–199. doi: 10.1016/j.abd.2019.09.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Isaacs T. Skin hypersensitivity reactions to preservatives: Allergies in the workplace. Curr. Opin. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2012;25:41–45. [Google Scholar]
- 53.Burnett C., Bergfeld W.F., Belsito D.V., Klassen C.D. Final report of the safety assessment of methylisothiazolinone. Int. J. Toxicol. 2010;29:187S–213S. doi: 10.1177/1091581810374651. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Scherrer M.A.R., Rocha V.B. Increasing trend of sensitization to Methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone (MCI/MI) An. Bras. Dermatol. 2014;89:527. doi: 10.1590/abd1806-4841.20142852. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Statham B.N., Smith E.V., Bodger O.G., Green C.M., King C.M., Ormerod A.D., Sansom J.E., English J.S.C., Wilkinson M.S., Gawkrodger D.J., et al. Concomitant contact allergy to methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone and formaldehyde-releasing preservatives. Contact Dermat. 2010;62:56–57. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2009.01653.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Opinion Concerning on Clarification on the Formaldehyde and Para-Formaldehyde Entry in Directive 76/768/EEC on Cosmetic Products. Adopted by the SCCNFP during the 22nd Plenary Meeting of 17 December 2002. European Commision; Brussels, Belgium: 2002. [Google Scholar]
- 57.Mutter J., Yeter D. Kawasaki’s disease, acrodynia, and mercury. Curr. Med. Chem. 2008;15:3000–3010. doi: 10.2174/092986708786848712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Eke D., Celik A. Genotoxicity of thimerosal in cultured human lymphocytes with and without metabolic activation sister chromatid exchange analysis proliferation index and mitotic index. Toxicol. Vitr. 2008;22:927–934. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2008.01.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Berman R.F., Pessah I., Mouton P., Mav D., Harry J. Low-level neonatal thimerosal exposure: Further evaluation of altered neurotoxic potential in SJL mice. Toxicol. Sci. 2008;101:294–309. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfm265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Park E.K., Mak S.K., Kültz D., Hammock B.D. Evaluation of cytotoxicity attributed to thimerosal on murine and human kidney cells. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health. 2007;70:2092–2095. doi: 10.1080/15287390701551324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Liu S.I., Huang C.C., Huang C.J., Wang B.W., Chang P.M., Fang Y.C., Chen W.C., Wang J.L., Lu Y.C., Chu S.T., et al. Thimerosal-induced apoptosis in human SCM1 gastric cancer cells: Activation of p38 MAP kinase and caspase-3 pathways without involvement of [Ca2+] i elevation. Toxicol. Sci. 2007;100:109–117. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfm205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Nguyen D.Q., Srinivasan S., Hiscott P., Kaye S.B. Thimerosal-induced limbal stem cell failure: Report of a case and review of the literature. Eye Contact Lens. 2007;33:196–198. doi: 10.1097/01.icl.0000247636.10720.19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Dorea J.G. Exposure to mercury during the first six months via human milk and vaccines: Modifying risk factors. Am. J. Perinatol. 2007;24:387–400. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-982074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Bigham M., Copes R. Thiomersal in vaccines. Drug Saf. 2005;28:89–101. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200528020-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Knezevic I., Griffiths E., Reigel F., Dobbelaer R. Thiomersal in vaccines: A regulatory perspective-WHO Consultation, Geneva, 15–16 April 2002. Vaccine. 2004;22:1836–1841. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2003.11.051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Chang Y.S., Wu C.L., Tseng S.H., Kuo P.Y., Tseng S.Y. In vitro benzyl alcohol cytotoxicity: Implications for intravitreal use of triamcinolone acetonide. Exp. Eye Res. 2008;86:942–950. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2008.03.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Bitter C., Suter K., Figueiredo V., Pruente C., Hatz K. Preservative-free triamcinolone acetonide suspension developed for intravitreal injection. J. Ocular. Pharmacol. Ther. 2008;24:62–69. doi: 10.1089/jop.2007.0043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Kaur I.P., Lal S., Rana C., Kakkar S., Singh H. Ocular preservatives: Associated risks and newer options. Cutan. Ocul. Toxicol. 2009;28:93–103. doi: 10.1080/15569520902995834. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Curry E.J., Warshaw E.M. Benzyl alcohol allergy: Importance of patch testing with personal products. Dermatitis. 2005;16:203–208. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Langsrud S., Steinhauer K., Lüthje S., Weber K., Goroncy-Bermes P., Holck A.L. Ethylhexylglycerin impairs membrane integrity and enhances the lethal effect of phenoxyethanol. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0165228. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Aerts O., Verhulst L., Goossens A. Ethylhexylglycerin: A low-risk, but highly relevant, sensitizer in ‘hypo-allergenic’cosmetics. Contact Derm. 2016;74:281–288. doi: 10.1111/cod.12546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Dorschner R.A., Shaw D.W. Allergic contact dermatitis from ethylhexylglycerin. Dermatitis. 2012;23:134. [Google Scholar]
- 73.Wineski L.E., English A.W. Phenoxyethanol as a nontoxic preservative in the dissection laboratory. Cells Tissues Organs. 1989;136:155–158. doi: 10.1159/000146816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.SCCS (Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety) Opinion on Phenoxyethanol, 16 March 2016, Final Version of 6 October 2016. SCCS/1575/16. [(accessed on 23 September 2019)]; Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/health/scientific_committees/consumer_safety/docs/sccs_o_195.pdf.
- 75.Aranzabal M.A., Arruti N., Joral A., Lasa E.M., Martínez S., Echenagusia M.A. Contact urticaria caused by phenoxyethanol in ultrasound gel. Contact Derm. 2019;81:132–133. doi: 10.1111/cod.13255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Dréno B., Zuberbier T., Gelmetti C., Gontijo G., Marinovich M. Safety review of phenoxyethanol when used as a preservative in cosmetics. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 2019;33:15–24. doi: 10.1111/jdv.15944. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Leikin J.B., Paloucek F.P. Poisoning and Toxicology Handbook. In Informa; Abingdon, UK: 2008. Chlorhexidine Gluconate; pp. 183–184. [Google Scholar]
- 78.Lai P., Coulson C., Pothier D.D., Rutka J. Chlorhexidine ototoxicity in ear surgery, part 1: Review of the literature. J. Otolaryngol.-Head Neck Surg. 2011;40:437–440. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Hirata K., Kurokawa A. Chlorhexidine gluconate ingestion resulting in fatal respiratory distress syndrome. Vet. Hum. Toxicol. 2002;44:89–91. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Ahmad I., Sheraz M.A., Ahmed S., Shaikh R.H., Vaid F.H.M., Ansari S.A. Photostability and interaction of ascorbic acid in cream formulations. Aaps. Pharmscitech. 2011;12:917–923. doi: 10.1208/s12249-011-9659-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Sheraz M.A., Khan M.F., Ahmed S., Kazi S.H., Ahmad I. Stability and stabilization of ascorbic acid. Househ. Pers. Care Today. 2015;10:22–25. [Google Scholar]
- 82.Sheraz M.A., Khan M.F., Ahmed S., Kazi S.H., Rehman Khattak S., Ahmad I. Factors affecting formulation characteristics and stability of ascorbic acid in water-in-oil creams. Int. J. Cosmet. Sci. 2014;36:494–504. doi: 10.1111/ics.12152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Tfouni S.A.V., Toledo M.C.F. Determination of benzoic and sorbic acids in Brazilian food. Food Control. 2002;13:117–123. doi: 10.1016/S0956-7135(01)00084-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.World Health Organization . Benzoic Acid and Sodium Benzoate. World Health Organization; Geneva, Switzerland: 2000. [Google Scholar]
- 85.Anyasi T.A., Jideani A.I.O., Edokpayi J.N., Anokwuru C.P. Application of Organic Acids. In: Vargas C., editor. Food Preservation, Organic Acids, Characteristics, Properties and Synthesis. Nova Publishers; New York, NY, USA: 2017. pp. 1–47. [Google Scholar]
- 86.Marz U. World Markets for Citric, Ascorbic and Isoascorbic Acids: Highlighting Antioxidants in Food. Business Communications Company; Ridgeland, MS, USA: 2002. [Google Scholar]
- 87.Silva M.M., Lidon F. Food preservatives–An overview on applications and side effects. Emir. J. Food Agric. 2016;28:366–373. doi: 10.9755/ejfa.2016-04-351. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Richter E., Wick A., Ternes T.A., Coors A. Ecotoxicity of climbazole, a fungicide contained in antidandruff shampoo. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2013;32:2816–2825. doi: 10.1002/etc.2367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Wesgate R., Menard-Szczebara F., Khodr A., Cupferman S., Maillard J.Y. Hydroxyethoxy phenyl butanone, a new cosmetic preservative, does not cause bacterial cross-resistance to antimicrobials. J. Med. Microbiol. 2020;69:670. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.001147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Bernauer U., Bodin L., Celleno L., Chaudhry Q. SCCS Opinion on Ethylzingerone–‘Hydroxyethoxyphenyl Butanone’ (HEPB) (Cosmetics Europe No P98) 2016. [(accessed on 15 January 2022)]. Available online: https://health.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2018-03/sccs_o_203_0.pdf. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 91.Zhang Y., Ying D., Liu H., Yu Z., Han L., Xie J., Xie Y. Serum pharmacokinetics and coagulation aberration induced by sodium dehydroacetate in male and female Wistar rats. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:1–9. doi: 10.1038/srep46210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Foti C., Romita P., Ettorre G., Angelini G., Bonamo D. Allergic contact dermatitis caused by resorcinol and sodium dehydroacetate in a patient with leg ulcers. Contact Derm. 2016;74:383–384. doi: 10.1111/cod.12575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.EFSA European Food Safety Authority Scientific Opinion on the re-evaluation of erythorbic acid (E 315) and sodium erythorbate (E 316) as food additives. EFSA J. 2016;14:4360. [Google Scholar]
- 94.Rahman M., Rashid O.H., Bhadra S., Rouf A.S. Development and Validation of Colorimetric and RP-HPLC Methods for the Determination of Formaldehyde in Cosmetics. Am. Chem. Sci. J. 2015;5:224–237. doi: 10.9734/ACSJ/2015/12385. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Sharma S. Food preservatives and their harmful effects. Int. J. Sci. Res. Publ. 2015;5:1–2. [Google Scholar]
- 96.Baig S.K.M.S., Kasim S.S. Study of Harmful Effects of Consuming Food Additives and Public Awareness. IJSRST. 2018;2:1071–1074. [Google Scholar]
- 97.WHO . Food Irradiation: A Technique for Preserving and Improving the Safety of Food. World Health Organization; Geneva, Switzerland: 1988. [Google Scholar]
- 98.Kovanda L., Zhang W., Wei X., Luo J., Wu X., Atwill E.R., Vaessen S., Li X., Liu Y. In vitro antimicrobial activities of organic acids and their derivatives on several species of gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria. Molecules. 2019;24:3770. doi: 10.3390/molecules24203770. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Gómez-García M., Sol C., de Nova P.J.G., Puyalto M., Mesas L., Puente H., Mencía-Ares O., Miranda R., Argüello H., Rubio P., et al. Antimicrobial activity of a selection of organic acids, their salts and essential oils against swine enteropathogenic bacteria. Porc. Health Manag. 2019;5:32. doi: 10.1186/s40813-019-0139-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Zapaśnik A., Sokołowska B., Bryła M. Role of Lactic Acid Bacteria in Food Preservation and Safety. Foods. 2022;11:1283. doi: 10.3390/foods11091283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Hassan R.A., Sand M.I., El-Kadi Sh M. Effect of some organic acids on fungal growth and their toxins production. J. Agric. Chem. Biotechnol. 2012;3:391–397. doi: 10.21608/jacb.2012.55011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Trček J., Mira N.P., Jarboe L.R. Adaptation and tolerance of bacteria against acetic acid. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2015;99:6215–6229. doi: 10.1007/s00253-015-6762-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Levine A.S., Fellers C.R. Action of acetic acid on food spoilage microorganisms. J. Bacteriol. 1940;39:499–515. doi: 10.1128/jb.39.5.499-515.1940. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Hietala J., Vuori A., Johnsson P., Pollari I., Reutemann W., Kieczka H. Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry. Vol. 1. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co; Hoboken, NJ, USA: 2016. Formic acid; pp. 1–22. [Google Scholar]
- 105.Alakomi H.L., Skytta E., Saarela M., Mattila-Sandholm T., Latva-Kala K., Helander I.M. Lactic acid permeabilizes gram-negative bacteria by disrupting the outer membrane. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2000;66:2001–2005. doi: 10.1128/AEM.66.5.2001-2005.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Shamloo E., Hosseini H., Abdi Moghadam Z., Halberg Larsen M., Haslberger A., Alebouyeh M. Importance of Listeria monocytogenes in food safety: A review of its prevalence, detection, and antibiotic resistance. Iran. J. Vet. Res. 2019;20:241. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Mcclure N.B. Ph.D. Thesis. Lowa State University; Ames, IA, USA: 2009. The Effect of Lactate on Nitrite in a Cured Meat System. [Google Scholar]
- 108.USDA . Technical Evaluation Report Compiled by OMRI for the USDA National Organic Program, Lactic Acid, Sodium Lactate, and Potassium Lactate, Handling/Processing. USDA; Washington, DC, USA: Feb 17, 2015. Technical Evaluation Report. [Google Scholar]
- 109.Adler G.K., Hornik E.S., Murray G., Bhandari S. Acute effects of the food preservative propionic acid on glucose metabolism in humans. BMJ Open Diabet. Res. Care. 2021;9:e002336. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2021-002336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.European Parliament, Council of the European Union . Directive 2008/7/CE of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 March 2008. European Parliament; Strasbourg, France: 2008. [Google Scholar]
- 111.Naveed N. The perils of cosmetics. J. Pharm. Sci. Res. 2014;6:338. [Google Scholar]
- 112.Dhillon G.S., Kaur S., Pulicharla R., Brar S.K., Cledón M., Verma M., Surampalli R.Y. Triclosan: Current status, occurrence, environmental risks and bioaccumulation potential. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2015;12:5657–5684. doi: 10.3390/ijerph120505657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Younes M. EFSA ANS Panel (EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources Added to Food) Wiley; Hoboken, NJ, USA: 2017. pp. 520–523. [Google Scholar]
- 114.Lien E.L. Toxicology and safety of DHA. Prostaglandins Leukot. Essent. Fat. Acids. 2009;81:125–132. doi: 10.1016/j.plefa.2009.05.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Carocho M., Morales P., Ferreira I.C. Antioxidants: Reviewing the chemistry, food applications, legislation and role as preservatives. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2018;71:107–120. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2017.11.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 116.EFSA EFSA Panel on Food additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food (ANS). Scientific opinion on the re-evaluation of dimethyl dicarbonate (DMDC, E 242) as a food additive. EFSA J. 2015;13:4319. [Google Scholar]
- 117.Yu Y., Wu J., Xu Y., Xiao G., Zou B. Effect of high pressure homogenization and dimethyl dicarbonate (DMDC) on microbial and physicochemical qualities of mulberry juice. J. Food Sci. 2016;81:702–708. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.13213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Costa A., Barata A., Malfeito-Ferreira M., Loureiro V. Evaluation of the inhibitory effect of dimethyl dicarbonate (DMDC) against wine microorganisms. Food Microbiol. 2008;25:422–427. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2007.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Katdare A., Chaubal M. Excipient Development for Pharmaceutical, Biotechnology, and Drug Delivery Systems. CRC Press; Boca Raton, FL, USA: 2006. [Google Scholar]
- 120.Beringer P. Remington the Science & Practice of Pharmacy. Lippincott Williams; Philadelphia, PE, USA: 2006. [Google Scholar]
- 121.Fahelelbom K.M.S., El-Shabrawy Y. Analysis of preservatives in pharmaceutical products. Pharm. Rev. 2007;5:1–55. [Google Scholar]
- 122.Freeman P.D., Kahook M.Y. Preservatives in topical ophthalmic medications: Historical and clinical perspectives. Exp. Rev. Ophthalmol. 2009;4:59–64. doi: 10.1586/17469899.4.1.59. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Boimer C., Birt C.M. Preservative exposure and surgical outcomes in glaucoma patients: The PESO study. J. Glaucoma. 2013;22:730–735. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31825af67d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Goto Y., Ibaraki N., Miyake K. Human lens epithelial cell damage and stimulation of their secretion of chemical mediators by benzalkonium chloride rather than latanoprost and timolol. Arch. Ophthalmol. 2003;121:835–839. doi: 10.1001/archopht.121.6.835. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Sarkar R. Effects of preservatives used in ocular medications on the eye: A comparative review. Ophthalmol. J. 2021;6:44–52. doi: 10.5603/OJ.2021.0009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Graf P. Benzalkonium chloride as a preservative in nasal solutions: Re-examining the data. Resp. Med. 2001;95:728–733. doi: 10.1053/rmed.2001.1127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Celestino M.T., Magalhães U.O., Fraga A.G.M., Carmo F.A., Lione V., Castro H.C., de Sousa V.P., Rodrigues C.R., Cabral L.M. Rational use of antioxidants in solid oral pharmaceutical preparations. Braz. J. Pharm. Sci. 2012;48:405–415. doi: 10.1590/S1984-82502012000300007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Özgür M., Kalaycioğlu Z., Dülger Ö. Simultaneous spectrophotometric determination of phenolic antioxidant (BHA and BHT) concentrations in pharmaceutical preparations and chewing gums using the H-point standard addition method. Maced. J. Chem. Chem Eng. 2017;36:211–222. doi: 10.20450/mjcce.2017.1330. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Felter S.P., Zhang X., Thompson C. Butylated hydroxyanisole: Carcinogenic food additive to be avoided or harmless antioxidant important to protect food supply? Regul. Toxicol Pharmacol. 2021;121:104887. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2021.104887. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Tade R.S., More M.P., Chatap V.K., Deshmukh P.K., Patil P.O. Safety and toxicity assessment of parabens in pharmaceutical and food products. Invent Rapid Pharm. Pract. 2018;3:1–9. [Google Scholar]
- 131.Pugazhendhi D., Pope G.S., Darbre P.D. Oestrogenic activity of p-hydroxybenzoic acid (common metabolite of paraben esters) and methylparaben in human breast cancer cell lines. J. Appl. Toxicol. 2005;25:301–309. doi: 10.1002/jat.1066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Latorre N., Silvestre J.F., Monteagudo A.F. Allergic contact dermatitis caused by formaldehyde and formaldehyde releasers. Actas Dermo-Sifiliográficas. 2011;102:86–97. doi: 10.1016/j.ad.2010.09.004. (In English) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Gołoś A., Lutyńska A. Thiomersal-containing vaccines–a review of the current state of knowledge. Przegl Epidemiol. 2015;69:59–64. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Kracke G., Landrum A. Chlorobutanol, a pharmaceutical preservative and sedative hypnotic, inhibits brain type voltage gated sodium channels. Biophys. J. 2011;100:421a. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2010.12.2492. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 135.WHO Expert Committee on Biological Standardization and World Health Organization . WHO Expert Committee on Biological Standardization (meeting held in Geneva, Switzerland) Seventy-fourth Report. Volume 978 WHO; Geneva, Switzerland: 2013. [Google Scholar]
- 136.Nair B. Final report on the safety assessment of Benzyl Alcohol, Benzoic Acid, and Sodium Benzoate. Int. J. Toxicol. 2001;20:23–50. doi: 10.1080/10915810152630729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Scognamiglio J., Jones L., Vitale D., Letizia C.S., Api A.M. Fragrance material review on benzyl alcohol. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2012;50:140–160. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2011.10.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.European Medicines Agency . Benzyl Alcohol and Benzoic Acid Group Used as Excipients. European Medicines Agency; Amsterdam, The Netherlands: 2017. pp. 2–16. EMA/CHMP/272866/2013. [Google Scholar]
- 139.Vogt T., Landthaler M., Stolz W. Generalized eczema in an 18-month-old boy due to phenoxyethanol in DPT vaccine. Contact Derm. 1998;38:50–51. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1998.tb05644.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Lowe I., Southern J. The antimicrobial activity of phenoxyethanol in vaccines. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 1994;18:115–116. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.1994.tb00820.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Komatsu E., Yamazaki H., Abe K., Iyama S., Oishi M., Sato T., Yoshino C., Hashimoto H., Watanabe M., Nagai M. Influence of temperature on the efficacy of 2-phenoxyethanol as a preservative for adsorbed diphtheria-purified pertussis-tetanus combined vaccine. J. Health Sci. 2002;48:89–92. doi: 10.1248/jhs.48.89. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Hoang T.P.N., Ghori M.U., Conway B.R. Topical antiseptic formulations for skin and soft tissue infections. Pharmaceutics. 2021;13:558. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13040558. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.SCCS (Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety) Opinion on the Safety of Poly (Hexamethylene) Biguanide Hydrochloride or Polyaminopropyl Biguanide (PHMB) in Cosmetic Products, 18 June 2014, SCCS/1535/14, Revision of 16 December 2014, 2nd Revision of 13 July 2015. [(accessed on 4 June 2020)]; doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2015.09.035. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/health/scientific_committees/consumer_safety/docs/sccs_o_157.pdf. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 144.Anupama S., Sharma P.K., Garima G. Natural products as preservatives. Int. J. Pharma Bio Sci. 2010;1:612. [Google Scholar]
- 145.Sharif Z.I.M., Mustapha F.A., Jai J., Yusof N., Zaki N.A.M. Review on methods for preservation and natural preservatives for extending the food longevity. Chem. Eng. Res. Bull. 2017;19:145–153. doi: 10.3329/cerb.v19i0.33809. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Robbins R.J. Phenolic acids in foods: An overview of analytical methodology. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2003;51:2866–2887. doi: 10.1021/jf026182t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Ignat I., Volf I., Popa V.I. A critical review of methods for characterisation of polyphenolic compounds in fruits and vegetables. Food Chem. 2011;126:1821–1835. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.12.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Teodoro G.R., Ellepola K., Seneviratne C.J., Koga-Ito C.Y. Potential use of phenolic acids as anti-Candida agents: A review. Front. Microbiol. 2015;6:1420. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Pereira D.M., Valentão P., Pereira J.A., Andrade P.B. Phenolics: From chemistry to biology. Molecules. 2009;14:2202–2211. doi: 10.3390/molecules14062202. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Chong K.P., Rossall S., Atong M. In vitro antimicrobial activity and fungitoxicity of syringic acid, caffeic acid and 4-hydroxybenzoic acid against Ganoderma boninense. J. Agric. Sci. 2009;1:15. doi: 10.5539/jas.v1n2p15. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Croft K.D. The chemistry and biological effects of flavonoids and phenolic acids. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1998;854:435–442. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1998.tb09922.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Yang C.S., Landau J.M., Huang M.T., Newmark H.L. Inhibition of carcinogenesis by dietary polyphenolic compounds. Ann. Rev. Nutr. 2001;21:381. doi: 10.1146/annurev.nutr.21.1.381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.Khadem S., Marles R.J. Monocyclic phenolic acids; hydroxy-and polyhydroxybenzoic acids: Occurrence and recent bioactivity studies. Molecules. 2010;15:7985–8005. doi: 10.3390/molecules15117985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154.Lafay S., Gil-Izquierdo A. Bioavailability of phenolic acids. Phytochem. Rev. 2008;7:301–311. doi: 10.1007/s11101-007-9077-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Clifford M.N. Chlorogenic acids and other cinnamates–nature, occurrence and dietary burden. J. Sci. Food Agric. 1999;79:362–372. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0010(19990301)79:3<362::AID-JSFA256>3.0.CO;2-D. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 156.Tsao R., Deng Z. Separation procedures for naturally occurring antioxidant phytochemicals. J. Chromatogr. B. 2004;812:85–99. doi: 10.1016/S1570-0232(04)00764-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157.Embuscado M.E. Spices and herbs: Natural sources of antioxidants—A mini review. J. Funct. Foods. 2015;18:811–819. doi: 10.1016/j.jff.2015.03.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 158.Campêlo M.C.S., Medeiros J.M.S., Silva J.B.A. Natural products in food preservation. Int. Food Res. J. 2019;26:41–46. [Google Scholar]
- 159.Rice-Evans C.A., Miller N.J., Paganga G. Structure-antioxidant activity relationships of flavonoids and phenolic acids. Free Rad. Biol. Med. 1996;20:933–956. doi: 10.1016/0891-5849(95)02227-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160.Hobson C., Chan A.N., Wright G.D. The antibiotic resistome: A guide for the discovery of natural products as antimicrobial agents. Chem. Rev. 2021;121:3464–3494. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c01214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161.Link K.P., Angell H.R., Walker J.C. The isolation of protocatechuic acid from pigmented onion scales and its significance in relation to disease resistance in onions. J. Biol. Chem. 1929;81:369–375. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)83819-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 162.Brito T.B.N., Lima L.R.S., Santos M.C.B., Moreira R.F.A., Cameron L.C., Fai A.E.C., Ferreira M.S.L. Antimicrobial, antioxidant, volatile and phenolic profiles of cabbage-stalk and pineapple-crown flour revealed by GC-MS and UPLC-MSE. Food Chem. 2021;339:127882. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.127882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163.Jiang Y., Fang Z., Leonard W., Zhang P. Phenolic compounds in Lycium berry: Composition, health benefits and industrial applications. J. Funct. Foods. 2021;77:104340. doi: 10.1016/j.jff.2020.104340. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 164.Manach C., Scalbert A., Morand C., Rémésy C., Jiménez L. Polyphenols: Food sources and bioavailability. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2004;79:727–747. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/79.5.727. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165.Puupponen-Pimiä R., Nohynek L., Meier C., Kähkönen M., Heinonen M., Hopia A., Oksman-Caldentey K.M. Antimicrobial properties of phenolic compounds from berries. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2001;90:494–507. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2001.01271.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166.Alasalvar C., Grigor J.M., Zhang D., Quantick P.C., Shahidi F. Comparison of volatiles, phenolics, sugars, antioxidant vitamins, and sensory quality of different colored carrot varieties. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2001;49:1410–1416. doi: 10.1021/jf000595h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 167.Potter A.S., Foroudi S., Stamatikos A., Patil B.S., Deyhim F. Drinking carrot juice increases total antioxidant status and decreases lipid peroxidation in adults. Nutr. J. 2011;10:96. doi: 10.1186/1475-2891-10-96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168.Gachkar L., Yadegari D., Rezaei M.B., Taghizadeh M., Astaneh S.A., Rasooli I. Chemical and biological characteristics of Cuminum cyminum and Rosmarinus officinalis essential oils. Food Chem. 2007;102:898–904. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2006.06.035. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 169.Mayachiew P., Devahastin S. Antimicrobial and antioxidant activities of Indian gooseberry and galangal extracts. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2008;41:1153–1159. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2007.07.019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 170.Inglett G.E., Rose D.J., Chen D., Stevenson D.G., Biswas A. Phenolic content and antioxidant activity of extracts from whole buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Möench) with or without microwave irradiation. Food Chem. 2010;119:1216–1219. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.07.041. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 171.Morishita T., Yamaguchi H., Degi K. The contribution of polyphenols to antioxidative activity in common buckwheat and tartary buckwheat grain. Plant Prod. Sci. 2007;10:99–104. doi: 10.1626/pps.10.99. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 172.Deleu C.Q., Gressier B., Vasseur J., Dine T., Brunet C., Luyckx M., Cazin M., Cazin J.C., Bailleul F., Trotin F. Phenolic compounds and antioxidant activities of buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench) hulls and flour. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2000;72:35–42. doi: 10.1016/S0378-8741(00)00196-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173.Taie H.A.A., El-Mergawi R., Radwan S. Isoflavonoids, flavonoids, phenolic acids profiles and antioxidant activity of soybean seeds as affected by organic and bioorganic fertilization. Am. Eurasian J. Agric. Environ. Sci. 2008;4:207–213. [Google Scholar]
- 174.Boyer J., Liu R.H. Apple phytochemicals and their health benefits. Nutr. J. 2004;3:5. doi: 10.1186/1475-2891-3-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 175.Abdullah N., Zulkifli K.S., Abdullah A., Aziman N., Saidatul S.W.K.W. Assessment on the antioxidant and antibacterial activities of selected fruit peels. Int. J. Chem. Tech. Res. 2012;4:1534–1542. [Google Scholar]
- 176.Heleno S.A., Martins A., Queiroz M.J.R.P., Ferreira I.C.F.R. Bioactivity of phenolic acids: Metabolites versus parent compounds: A review. Food Chem. 2015;173:501–513. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.10.057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 177.Pokorny J., Yanishlieva N., Gordon M.H. Antioxidants in Food: Practical Applications. CRC Press; Boca Raton, FL, USA: 2001. [Google Scholar]
- 178.Hudson E.A., Dinh P.A., Kokubun T., Simmonds M.S.J., Gescher A. Characterization of potentially chemopreventive phenols in extracts of brown rice that inhibit the growth of human breast and colon cancer cells. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prevent. 2000;9:1163–1170. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 179.Parashar A., Badal S. Pomegranate juice is potentially better than orange juice in improving antioxidant function in elderly subjects. Elixir Food Sci. J. 2011;32:2068–2074. doi: 10.9734/IJBCRR/2011/164. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 180.Khanduja K.L., Gandhi R.K., Pathania V., Syal N. Prevention of N-nitrosodiethylamine-induced lung tumorigenesis by ellagic acid and quercetin in mice. Food Chem. Toxicol. 1999;37:313–318. doi: 10.1016/S0278-6915(99)00021-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 181.Swami S.B., Thakor N.S.J., Patil M.M., Haldankar P.M. Jamun (Syzygium cumini (L.)): A review of its food and medicinal uses. Food Nutr. Sci. 2012;3:1100–1117. [Google Scholar]
- 182.De S., Chakraborty J., Chakraborty R.N., Das S. Chemopreventive activity of quercetin during carcinogenesis in cervix uteri in mice. Phytother. Res. 2000;14:347–351. doi: 10.1002/1099-1573(200008)14:5<347::AID-PTR613>3.0.CO;2-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 183.Wu G., Chang C., Hong C., Zhang H., Huang J., Jin Q., Wang X. Phenolic compounds as stabilizers of oils and antioxidative mechanisms under frying conditions: A comprehensive review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2019;92:33–45. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2019.07.043. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 184.Canan C., Delaroza F., Casagrande R., Baracat M.M., Shimokomaki M., Ida E.I. Antioxidant capacity of phytic acid purified from rice bran. Acta Sci. Technol. 2012;34:457–463. doi: 10.4025/actascitechnol.v34i4.16358. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 185.Vaher M., Matso K., Levandi T., Helmja K., Kaljurand M. Phenolic compounds and the antioxidant activity of the bran, flour and whole grain of different wheat varieties. Procedia Chem. 2010;2:76–82. doi: 10.1016/j.proche.2009.12.013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 186.Yang J., Martinson T.E., Liu R.H. Phytochemical profiles and antioxidant activities of wine grapes. Food Chem. 2009;116:332–339. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.02.021. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 187.Xia E.Q., Deng G.F., Guo Y.J., Li H.B. Biological activities of polyphenols from grapes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2010;11:622–646. doi: 10.3390/ijms11020622. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 188.Martillanes S., Rocha-Pimienta J., Cabrera-Bañegil M., Martín-Vertedor D., Delgado-Adámez J. Application of Phenolic Compounds for Food Preservation: Food Additive and Active Packaging, Phenolic Compounds–Biological Activity. IntechOpen; London, UK: 2017. pp. 39–58. [Google Scholar]
- 189.Phan K., Van Den Broeck E., Van Speybroeck V., De Clerck K., Raes K., De Meester S. The potential of anthocyanins from blueberries as a natural dye for cotton: A combined experimental and theoretical study. Dye. Pigment. 2020;176:108180. doi: 10.1016/j.dyepig.2019.108180. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 190.PJ Garrido E.M., Cerqueira A.S., Chavarria D., Silva T., Borges F., MPJ Garrido J. Microencapsulation of caffeic acid phenethyl ester and caffeic acid phenethyl amide by inclusion in hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin. Food Chem. 2018;254:260–265. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.02.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 191.Ge J., Yue P., Chi J., Liang J., Gao X. Formation and stability of anthocyanins-loaded nanocomplexes prepared with chitosan hydrochloride and carboxymethyl chitosan. Food Hydrocoll. 2018;74:23–31. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2017.07.029. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 192.Liu J., Wang X., Yong H., Kan J., Jin C. Recent advances in flavonoid-grafted polysaccharides: Synthesis, structural characterization, bioactivities and potential applications. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018;116:1011–1025. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.05.149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 193.de Araújo F.F., de Paulo Farias D., Neri-Numa I.A., Pastore G.M. Polyphenols and their applications: An approach in food chemistry and innovation potential. Food Chem. 2021;338:127535. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.127535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 194.Alimentarius C. General standard for food additives CODEX STAN 192-1995, adopted in 1995, revision 2015. Volume 36 Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; Rome, Italy: World Health Organization; Geneva, Switzerland: 1995. [Google Scholar]
- 195.Food Safety and Standards Authority of India . Gazette Notification No. Stds/Additives-1/Notification/FSSAI/2018 dated 16 Sep. 2020 on Food Safety and Standards (Food Products Standards and Food Additives) Seventh Amendment Regulations, 2020 to amend regulations 3.1 and Appendix A. Food Safety and Standards Authority of India; New Delhi, India: 2020. [Google Scholar]
- 196.Food Safety and Standards . Food Products Standards and Food Additives Regulations, 2011. FSSAI; New Delhi, India: 2020. [Google Scholar]
- 197.European Commission Commission Regulation (EU) No 257/2010 of 25 March 2010 setting up a programme for the re-evaluation of approved food additives in accordance with Regulation No 1333/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on food additives. Off. J. Eur. Union. 2010;80:19–27. [Google Scholar]
- 198.European Commission Commission Regulation (EU) No 231/2012 of 9 March 2012 laying down specifications for food additives listed in Annexes II and III to Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council. Off. J. Eur. Union. 2012;83:1–295. [Google Scholar]
- 199.Saltmarsh M., Saltmarsh M. Essential Guide to Food Additives. Royal Society of Chemistry; London, UK: 2013. [Google Scholar]
- 200.Bernauer U., Bodin L., Chaudry Q., Coenraads P.J., Dusinka M., Ezendam J., Gaffet E. Addendum to the Scientific Opinions on Climbazole (P64)/Ref. SCCS/1506/13 and SCCS/1590/1-Latest Edition SCCS/1600/18–Final Version. Publications Office of the European Union; Luxembourg: 2019. p. 13. [Google Scholar]
- 201.Bernauer U., Bodin L., Chaudhry Q., Coenraads P.J., Dusinska M., Ezendam E. Scientific Committee of Consumer Safety. 2017. Opinion of the Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS)–Final version of the opinion on Ethylzingerone-‘Hydroxyethoxyphenyl Butanone’(HEPB)-Cosmetics Europe No P98-in cosmetic products. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2018;88:330–331. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2017.04.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 202.Modi N., Ramarao P. Misleading advertisements. Int. J. Res. Anal. Rev. 2019;6:569–576. [Google Scholar]
- 203.Hasan U., Noida G., Nasreen R. An analysis of Policies pertaining to Deceptive advertising and Consumer protection mechanism in India. Int. J. Res. Analytic. Rev. 2018;5:1233–1239. [Google Scholar]
- 204.Nuseir M.T. Impact of misleading/false advertisement to consumer behaviour. Int. J. Econ. Bus. Res. 2018;16:453–465. doi: 10.1504/IJEBR.2018.095343. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 205.Morris L.A. Improving Drug Safety—A Joint Responsibility. Springer; Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: 1992. Manufacturer Standards for Communicating Pharmaceutical Risks and Benefits; pp. 203–206. [Google Scholar]
- 206.World Health Organization & Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives . Evaluation of certain contaminants in food: Eighty-third report of the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives. World Health Organization; Geneva, Switzerland: 2017. [Google Scholar]
- 207.Girimaji P. Misleading Advertisements and Consumer. Centre for Consumer Studies Indian Institute of Public Administration; New Delhi, India: 2013. (Consumer Education Monograph Series 2). [Google Scholar]
- 208.Karn R. Unfair Trade Practices. Int. J. Law Manag. Humanit. 2021;4:1945. [Google Scholar]
- 209.Gupta A., Chandra K. Misleading Drug Advertisements: Busting the Myth and Protecting Consumers. Jus Corpus Law J. 2020;1:235. [Google Scholar]
- 210.European Parliament . Vol. 44. European Parliament; Strasbourg, France: 2006. Directive 2006/114/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 Concerning Misleading and Comparative Advertising, Art. 2 (a)–Belgian Electronic Sorting Technology NV v. Bert Peelaers and Visys NV; p. 991. [Google Scholar]
- 211.Raju T.M. Advertising regulations in India. J. Stud. Manag. Plan. 2018;4:265–267. [Google Scholar]
- 212.García-Nieto M.T., Gonzálvez-Vallés J.E., Viñarás-Abad M. Social Responsibility and Misleading Advertising of Health Products on the Radio. The Opinion of the Professionals. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2021;18:6912. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18136912. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 213.Pastor-Nieto M.A., Alcántara-Nicolás F., Melgar-Molero V., Pérez-Mesonero R., Vergara-Sánchez A., Martín-Fuentes A., González-Muñoz P., de Eusebio-Murillo E. Preservatives in personal hygiene and cosmetic products, topical medications, and household cleaners in Spain. Actas Dermo-Sifiliográficas. 2017;108:758–770. doi: 10.1016/j.ad.2017.04.003. (In English) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 214.Petric Z., Ružić J., Žuntar I. The controversies of parabens–an overview nowadays. Acta Pharm. 2021;71:17–32. doi: 10.2478/acph-2021-0001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 215.Torfs E., Brackman G. A perspective on the safety of parabens as preservatives in wound care products. Int. Wound J. 2021;18:221–232. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 216.Karwacka A., Zamkowska D., Radwan M., Jurewicz J. Exposure to modern, widespread environmental endocrine disrupting chemicals and their effect on the reproductive potential of women: An overview of current epidemiological evidence. Hum. Fertil. 2019;22:2–25. doi: 10.1080/14647273.2017.1358828. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 217.Liu W., Zhou Y., Li J., Sun X., Liu H., Jiang Y., Peng Y., Zhao H., Xia W., Li Y., et al. Parabens exposure in early pregnancy and gestational diabetes mellitus. Environ. Int. 2019;126:468–475. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.02.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 218.Garner N., Siol A., Eilks I. Parabens as preservatives in personal care products. Chem. Action. 2014;103:36–43. [Google Scholar]
- 219.Sasseville D., Alfalah M., Lacroix J.P. Parabenoia debunked, or who’s afraid of parabens? Dermatitis. 2015;26:254–259. doi: 10.1097/DER.0000000000000147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 220.SCCS (Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety) Opinion on Propylparaben (CAS No 94-13-3, EC No 202-307-7), Preliminary Version of 27-28 October 2020, Final Version of 30-31 March 2021, SCCS/1623/20. SCCS; Luxembourg: Oct 28, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- 221.Nowak K., Ratajczak–Wrona W., Górska M., Jabłońska E. Parabens and their effects on the endocrine system. Mol. Cell Endocrinol. 2018;474:238–251. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2018.03.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 222.The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 of the european parliament and of the council. Off. J. Eur. Union. 2009;342:59. [Google Scholar]
- 223.Wei F., Mortimer M., Cheng H., Sang N., Guo L.H. Parabens as chemicals of emerging concern in the environment and humans: A review. Sci. Total Environ. 2021;778:146150. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 224.SCCS (Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety) Clarification on Opinion SCCS/1348/10 in the Light of the Danish Clause of Safeguard Banning the Use of Parabens in Cosmetic Products Intended for Children under Three Years of Age, 10 October 2011. [(accessed on 6 August 2020)]; Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/health/scientific_committees/consumer_safety/docs/sccs_o_069.pdf.
- 225.Agrawal A., Pandwar U., Pandya N. Are phenoxyethanol products safe for babies?–A review of current evidences. Indian J. Child Health. 2022;6:63–67. doi: 10.32677/ijch.v9i5.3465. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 226.Gulf Technical Regulation Standard on Safety Requirements of Cosmetics and Personal Care Products. GCC Standardization Organization (GSO); Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: 2016. [Google Scholar]
- 227.Jairoun A.A., Al-Hemyari S.S., Shahwan M., Zyoud S.H., Ashames A. Hidden formaldehyde content in cosmeceuticals containing preservatives that release formaldehyde and their compliance behaviors: Bridging the gap between compliance and local regulation. Cosmetics. 2020;7:93. doi: 10.3390/cosmetics7040093. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 228.Lavilla M., Gayán E.E. Innovative Technologies for Food Preservatio. Academic Press; Cambridge, MA, USA: 2018. Consumer Acceptance and Marketing of Foods Processed through Emerging Technologies; pp. 233–253. [Google Scholar]
- 229.Pathakoti K., Manubolu M., Hwang H.M. Nanostructures: Current uses and future applications in food science. J. Food Drug Anal. 2017;25:245–253. doi: 10.1016/j.jfda.2017.02.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 230.Bajpai V.K., Kamle M., Shukla S., Mahata D.K., Chandra P., Hwang S.K., Kumar P., Huh Y.S., Han Y.K. Prospects of using nanotechnology for food preservation, safety, and security. J. Food Drug Anal. 2018;26:1201–1214. doi: 10.1016/j.jfda.2018.06.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 231.Fu P.P. Introduction to the special issue: Nanomaterials-toxicology and medical applications. J. Food Drug Anal. 2014;22:1. doi: 10.1016/j.jfda.2014.01.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 232.Baranwal A., Srivastava A., Kumar P., Bajpai V.K., Maurya P.K., Chandra P. Prospects of nanostructure materials and their composites as antimicrobial agents. Front. Microbiol. 2018;9:422. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 233.Singh P. Nanotechnology in food preservation. Food Sci. 2018;9:435–441. doi: 10.15740/HAS/FSRJ/9.2/441-447. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 234.Hannon J., Kerry J., Cruz-Romero M., Morris M., Cummins E. Advances and challenges for the use of engineered nanoparticles in food contact materials. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2015;43:43–62. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2015.01.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 235.Mihindukulasuriya S.D.F., Lim L.T. Nanotechnology development in food packaging: A review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2014;40:149–167. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2014.09.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 236.Hutapea S., al-Shawi S.G., Chen T.C., You X., Bokov D., Abdelbasset W.K., Suksatan W. Study on food preservation materials based on nano-particle reagents. Food Sci. Technol. 2021;42:39721. doi: 10.1590/fst.39721. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 237.Li M., Liu H., Dang F., Hintelmann H., Yin B., Zhou D. Alteration of crop yield and quality of three vegetables upon exposure to silver nanoparticles in sludge-amended soil. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2020;8:2472–2480. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b06721. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 238.Zorraquín-Peña I., Cueva C., Bartolomé B., Moreno-Arribas M.V. Silver nanoparticles against foodborne bacteria. Effects at intestinal level and health limitations. Microorganisms. 2020;8:132. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8010132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 239.Seray M., Skender A., Hadj-Hamou A.S. Kinetics and mechanisms of Zn2+ release from antimicrobial food packaging based on poly (butylene adipate-co-terephthalate) and zinc oxide nanoparticles. Polym. Bull. 2021;78:1021–1040. doi: 10.1007/s00289-020-03145-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 240.Sridhar A., Ponnuchamy M., Kumar P.S., Kapoor A. Food preservation techniques and nanotechnology for increased shelf life of fruits, vegetables, beverages and spices: A review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2021;19:1715–1735. doi: 10.1007/s10311-020-01126-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 241.Emamifar A., Kadivar M., Shahedi M., Soleimanian-Zad S. Effect of nanocomposite packaging containing Ag and ZnO on inactivation of Lactobacillus plantarum in orange juice. Food Control. 2011;22:408–413. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2010.09.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 242.Jin T., Gurtler J.B. Inactivation of Salmonella in liquid egg albumen by antimicrobial bottle coatings infused with allyl isothiocyanate, nisin and zinc oxide nanoparticles. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2011;110:704–712. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2011.04938.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 243.Prakash J., Vignesh K., Anusuya T., Ramachandran C., Sudha Rani R., Rubab M., Khan I., Elahi F., Oh D.H., DevanandVenkatasubbu G. Application of nanoparticles in food preservation and food processing. J. Food Hyg. Saf. 2019;34:317–324. [Google Scholar]
- 244.Venkatasubbu G.D., Baskar R., Anusuya T., Seshan C.A., Chelliah R. Toxicity mechanism of titanium dioxide and zinc oxide nanoparticles against food pathogens. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces. 2016;148:600–606. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2016.09.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 245.Peter A., Tegla D., Liviu G., Cozmuta A.M. Development of Ag/TiO2-SiO2-coated food packaging film and its role in preservation of green lettuce during storage. Carpathian J. Food Sci. Technol. 2015;7:88–96. [Google Scholar]
- 246.Yemmireddy V.K., Hung Y.C. Effect of binder on the physical stability and bactericidal property of titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanocoatings on food contact surfaces. Food Control. 2015;57:82–88. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2015.04.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 247.Lim J.H., Sisco P., Mudalige T.K., Sanchez-Pomales G., Howard P.C., Linder S.W. Detection and characterization of SiO2 and TiO2 nanostructures in dietary supplements. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2015;63:3144–3152. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.5b00392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 248.Zahedi S.M., Karimi M., Teixeira da Silva J.A. The use of nanotechnology to increase quality and yield of fruit crops. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2020;100:25–310. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.10004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 249.Trifol J., Plackett D., Sillard C., Szabo P., Bras J., Daugaard A.E. Hybrid poly (lactic acid)/nanocellulose/nanoclay composites with synergistically enhanced barrier properties and improved thermomechanical resistance. Polym. Int. 2016;65:988–995. doi: 10.1002/pi.5154. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 250.Mahmoodi A., Ghodrati S., Khorasani M. High-strength, low-permeable, and light-protective nanocomposite films based on a hybrid nanopigment and biodegradable PLA for food packaging applications. ACS Omega. 2019;4:14947–14954. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.9b01731. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 251.Agriopoulou S., Stamatelopoulou E., Skiada V., Tsarouhas P., Varzakas T. Emerging nanomaterial applications for food packaging and preservation: Safety issues and risk assessment. Multidiscip. Digit. Publ. Inst. Proc. 2020;70:7. [Google Scholar]
- 252.Ahari H., Anvar A.A., Ataee M., Naeimabadi M. Employing nanosilver, nanocopper, and nanoclays in food packaging production: A systematic review. Coatings. 2021;11:509. doi: 10.3390/coatings11050509. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 253.Song H., Li B., Lin Q.-B., Wu H., Chen Y. Migration of silver from nanosilver–polyethylene composite packaging into food simulants. Food Add. Contamin. Part A. 2011;28:1758–1762. doi: 10.1080/19440049.2011.603705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 254.Avella M., De Vlieger J.J., Errico M.E., Fischer S., Vacca P., Volpe M.G. Biodegradable starch/clay nanocomposite films for food packaging applications. Food Chem. 2005;93:467–474. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2004.10.024. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 255.Bandyopadhyay J., Ray S.S. Are nanoclay-containing polymer composites safe for food packaging applications?—An overview. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2019;136:47214. doi: 10.1002/app.47214. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 256.Calabrese I., Liveri M.L.T., Ferreira M.J., Bento A., Vaz P.D., Calhorda M.J., Nunes C.D. Porous materials as delivery and protective agents for Vitamin A. RSC Adv. 2016;6:66495–66504. doi: 10.1039/C6RA12026A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 257.Giménez B., Gómez-Guillén M.C., López-Caballero M.E., Gómez-Estaca J., Montero P. Role of sepiolite in the release of active compounds from gelatin–egg white films. Food Hydrocoll. 2012;27:475–486. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2011.09.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 258.Mahdavinia G.R., Hosseini R., Darvishi F., Sabzi M. The release of cefazolin from chitosan/polyvinyl alcohol/sepiolite nanocomposite hydrogel films. Iran Polym. J. 2016;25:933–943. doi: 10.1007/s13726-016-0480-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 259.Massaro M., Colletti C.G., Lazzara G., Riela S. The use of some clay minerals as natural resources for drug carrier applications. J. Funct. Biomater. 2018;9:58. doi: 10.3390/jfb9040058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 260.Arredondo-Ochoa T., García-Almendárez B.E., Escamilla-García M., Martín-Belloso O., Rossi-Márquez G., Medina-Torres L., Regalado-González C. Physicochemical and antimicrobial characterization of beeswax–starch food-grade nanoemulsions incorporating natural antimicrobials. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017;18:2712. doi: 10.3390/ijms18122712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 261.Gundewadi G., Sarkar D.J., Rudra S.G., Singh D. Preparation of basil oil nanoemulsion using Sapindus mukorossi pericarp extract: Physico-chemical properties and antifungal activity against food spoilage pathogens. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2018;125:95–104. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.08.076. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 262.Farshi P., Tabibiazar M., Ghorbani M., Mohammadifar M., Amirkhiz M.B., Hamishehkar H. Whey protein isolate-guar gum stabilized cumin seed oil nanoemulsion. Food Biosci. 2019;28:49–56. doi: 10.1016/j.fbio.2019.01.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 263.Ashaolu T.J. Nanoemulsions for health, food, and cosmetics: A review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2021;19:3381–3395. doi: 10.1007/s10311-021-01216-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 264.Azmi N.A.N., Elgharbawy A.A.M., Motlagh S.R., Samsudin N., Salleh H.M. Nanoemulsions: Factory for food, pharmaceutical and cosmetics. Processes. 2019;7:617. doi: 10.3390/pr7090617. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 265.Jiang X., Valdeperez D., Nazarenus M., Wang Z. Future perspectives towards the use of nanomaterials for smart food packaging and quality control. Part. Part. Syst. Charact. 2015;32:408–416. doi: 10.1002/ppsc.201400192. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 266.Kumar V., Guleria P., Mehta S.K. Nanosensors for food quality and safety assessment. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2017;15:165–177. doi: 10.1007/s10311-017-0616-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 267.Realini C.E., Marcos B. Active and intelligent packaging systems for a modern society. Meat. Sci. 2014;98:404–419. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.06.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 268.Summo C., De Angelis D. The Importance of Edible Films and Coatings for Sustainable Food Development. Foods. 2022;11:3221. doi: 10.3390/foods11203221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 269.Jamróz E., Khachatryan G., Kopel P., Juszczak L., Kawecka A., Krzyściak P., Kucharek M., Bębenek Z., Zimowska M. Furcellaran nanocomposite films: The effect of nanofillers on the structural, thermal, mechanical and antimicrobial properties of biopolymer films. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020;240:116244. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 270.Zubair M., Ullah A. Recent advances in protein derived bionanocomposites for food packaging applications. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2020;60:406–434. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2018.1534800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 271.Chiou A., Kalogeropoulos N. Virgin olive oil as frying oil. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2017;16:632–646. doi: 10.1111/1541-4337.12268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 272.Barberis S., Quiroga H.G., Barcia C., Talia J.M., Debattista N. Natural food preservatives against microorganisms. Food Saf. Preserv. 2018:621–658. [Google Scholar]
- 273.De Villiers M. Surfactants and Emulsifying Agents. In: Thompson J.E., editor. A Practical Guide to Contemporary Pharmacy Practice. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; Philadelphia, PE, USA: 2009. p. 251. [Google Scholar]
- 274.Friedman M. Food browning and its prevention: An overview. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1996;44:631–653. doi: 10.1021/jf950394r. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 275.Molnar-Perl I., Friedman M. Inhibiton of browning by sulfur amino acids. 2. Fruit juices and protein-containing foods. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1990;38:1648–1651. doi: 10.1021/jf00098a005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 276.Mesías F.J., Martín A., Hernández A. ‘Consumers’ growing appetite for natural foods: Perceptions towards the use of natural preservatives in fresh fruit. Food Res. Int. 2021;150:110749. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2021.110749. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 277.Nadarzynski A., Scholz J., Schröder M.S. Skin Barrier Enhancing Alternative Preservation Strategy of O/W Emulsions by Water Activity Reduction with Natural Multifunctional Ingredients. Cosmetics. 2022;9:53. doi: 10.3390/cosmetics9030053. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 278.Varvaresou A., Papageorgiou S., Tsirivas E., Protopapa E. Self-preserving cosmetics. Int. J. Cosmet. Sci. 2009;31:163–175. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2494.2009.00492.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 279.Pushpalatha H.B., Pramod K., Sundaram R., Shyam R. Design and development of self-preserving and preservative-free herbal liquid oral formulation. J. Appl. Pharm. Sci. 2015;5:54–60. doi: 10.7324/JAPS.2015.54.S9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 280.Leistner L. Basic aspects of food preservation by hurdle technology. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2000;55:181–186. doi: 10.1016/S0168-1605(00)00161-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 281.Rostami Z., Ahmad M.A., Khan M.U., Mishra A.P., Rashidzadeh S., Shariati M.A. Food preservation by hurdle technology: A review of different hurdle and interaction with focus on foodstuffs. J. Pure Appl. Microbiol. 2016;10:2633–2639. doi: 10.22207/JPAM.10.4.20. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 282.Syed Q.A., Ishaq A., Rahman U.U., Aslam S., Shukat R. Pulsed electric field technology in food preservation: A review. J. Nutr. Health Food Eng. 2017;6:168–172. [Google Scholar]
- 283.Wouters P.C., Alvarez I., Raso J. Critical factors determining inactivation kinetics by pulsed electric field food processing. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2001;12:112–121. doi: 10.1016/S0924-2244(01)00067-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 284.Aghajanzadeh S., Ziaiifar A.M. A review of pectin methylesterase inactivation in citrus juice during pasteurization. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2018;71:1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2017.10.013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 285.Yu Y., Jin T.Z., Xiao G. Effects of pulsed electric fields pretreatment and drying method on drying characteristics and nutritive quality of blueberries. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2017;41:e13303. doi: 10.1111/jfpp.13303. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 286.Wibowo S., Essel E.A., De Man S., Bernaert N., Van Droogenbroeck B., Grauwet T., Van Loey A., Hendrickx M. Comparing the impact of high pressure, pulsed electric field and thermal pasteurization on quality attributes of cloudy apple juice using targeted and untargeted analyses. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2019;54:64–77. doi: 10.1016/j.ifset.2019.03.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 287.Salehi F. Physico-chemical properties of fruit and vegetable juices as affected by pulsed electric field: A review. Int. J. Food Prop. 2020;23:1036–1050. doi: 10.1080/10942912.2020.1775250. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 288.Luengo E., Martínez J.M., Álvarez I., Raso J. Effects of millisecond and microsecond pulsed electric fields on red beet cell disintegration and extraction of betanines. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2016;84:28–33. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.01.016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 289.Tamborrino A., Urbani S., Servili M., Romaniello R., Perone C., Leone A. Pulsed electric fields for the treatment of olive pastes in the oil extraction process. Appl. Sci. 2019;10:114. doi: 10.3390/app10010114. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 290.Gałązka-Czarnecka I., Korzeniewska E., Czarnecki A., Kiełbasa P., Dróżdż T. Modelling of carotenoids content in red clover sprouts using light of different wavelength and pulsed electric field. Appl Sci. 2020;10:4143. doi: 10.3390/app10124143. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 291.Quass D.W. A Status Report on Pulsed Electric Field. Electric Power Research Institute; Palo Alto, CA, USA: 1997. Pulsed Electric Field Processing in the Food Industry; pp. 23–35. [Google Scholar]
- 292.Zhang Z., Zhang B., Yang R., Zhao W. Recent developments in the preservation of raw fresh food by pulsed electric field. Food Rev. Int. 2020;38:247–265. doi: 10.1080/87559129.2020.1860083. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 293.Angelopoulou P., Giaouris E., Gardikis K. Applications and prospects of nanotechnology in food and cosmetics preservation. Nanomaterials. 2022;12:1196. doi: 10.3390/nano12071196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 294.Milstein S.R., Halper A.R., Katz L.M. Regulatory Requirements for the Marketing of Cosmetics in the United States. In: Barel A.O., Paye M., Maibach H.I., editors. Handbook of Cosmetic Science and Technology. CRC Press; Boca Raton, FL, USA: 2006. pp. 833–859. [Google Scholar]
- 295.Benson L., Reczek K. A Guide to United States Cosmetic Products Compliance Requirements. National Institute of Standards and Technology; Gaithersburg, MD, USA: 2021. [Google Scholar]
- 296.U.S. Code . Title 21-Food and Drugs. Legal Information Institute; Ithaca, NY, USA: 2011. pp. 304–306. Subchapter VI-Cosmetics. [Google Scholar]
- 297.Savić S., Paunović J. Safety of cosmetic products in the light of European legislation: Cosmetic Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009. Arhiv za farmaciju. 2018;68:911–933. [Google Scholar]
- 298.Ravi P., Reddy D.S., Ramu B., Rajkamal B. Comparative study on cosmetics legislation in India US and EU. World J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 2016;5:1. [Google Scholar]
- 299.Swagat D.K.T., Harish D. Cosmetics: Regulatory scenario in USA, EU and India. J. Pharm. Technol. Res. Manag. 2015;3:127–139. [Google Scholar]
- 300.Nagalakshmi S., Vaishnavi S., Pavithra G.M. Regulatory prototype for cosmetics in India. Asian J. Pharm. Clin. Res. 2021;14:12–16. [Google Scholar]
- 301.Raj R.K., Chandrul K.K. Regulatory requirements for cosmetics in relation with regulatory authorities in India against US, Europe, Australia and Asean countries. Int. J. Pharma Res. Health Sci. 2016;4:1332–1341. doi: 10.21276/ijprhs.2016.05.01. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 302.Elder R.L. The cosmetic ingredient review-a safety evaluation program. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 1984;11:1168–1174. doi: 10.1016/S0190-9622(84)80205-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 303.Elder D.P., Kuentz M., Holm R. Pharmaceutical excipients-quality, regulatory and biopharmaceutical considerations. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2016;87:88–99. doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2015.12.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 304.Cosmétiques-Microbiologie-Limites Microbiologiques European Committee for Standardization. International Organization for Standardization (ISO); Geneva, Switzerland: 2014. [Google Scholar]
- 305.Eixarch H., Wyness L., Sibanda M. The Regulation of Personalized Cosmetics in the EU. Cosmetics. 2019;6:29. doi: 10.3390/cosmetics6020029. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 306.Lásztity R., Petró-Turza M. Locations and tasks of the main institutions and organizations for food control systems. Food Qual. Stand. 2009;10:292. [Google Scholar]
- 307.Halabi S.F., Lin C.F. Assessing the relative influence and efficacy of public and private food safety regulation regimes: Comparing codex and GlobalG. AP standards. Food Drug. LJ. 2017;72:262. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 308.FSSAI . Manual of Methods of Analysis of Foods, Food Additives, Food Safety and Standards Authority of India. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India; New Delhi, India: 2012. [Google Scholar]
- 309.FSSAI. Food Safety and Standards (Food Products Standards and Food Additives) Regulations. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India; New Delhi, India: 2011. p. 280. [Google Scholar]
- 310.Yang H. Food Safety in India: Status and Challenges. Gates Open Res. 2019;3:1043. [Google Scholar]
- 311.Keener L. Ensuring Global Food Safety. Academic Press; Cambridge, MA, USA: 2022. Food Safety and Regulatory Survey of Food Additives and Other Substances in Human Food; pp. 259–273. [Google Scholar]
- 312.Benard O., Daisy L., Oniang’o R. Food Safety: Some Global Trends. Volume 19 IntechOpen; London, UK: 2018. Food Safety Legislation in Some Developing Countries. [Google Scholar]
- 313.Meadows M. Promoting safe and effective drugs for 100 years. FDA Consum. Mag. 2006;40:14–20. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 314.Robin A.L., Sankhla D. Essential Guide to Food Additives. Volume 44 RSC Publishing Cambridge; Cambridge, UK: 2013. European Legislative Framework Controlling the Use of Food Additives. [Google Scholar]
- 315.Ahvenainen R. Novel Food Packaging Techniques. Woodhead Publishing; Cambridge, UK: 2003. Active and Intelligent Packaging: An Introduction; pp. 5–21. [Google Scholar]
- 316.Haleem R.M., Salem M.Y., Fatahallah F.A., Abdelfattah L.E. Quality in the pharmaceutical industry–A literature review. Saudi Pharm. J. 2015;23:463–469. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2013.11.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 317.Chatterjee B., Dash B., Shrestha B., Bhuyan N.R. Current Scenarios on Regulatory Landscape of Indian Pharmaceutical Industries. Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Res. 2021;12:5642–5651. [Google Scholar]
- 318.Yadav P., Bahmani K., Pawar N., Sharma A. A Review on: Indian Pharma Regulatory System and List of New Drugs Approved by Central Drugs Standard Control Organization in the Year 2021 Till Date. Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Res. 2021;12:5642–5651. [Google Scholar]
- 319.Tsien A.Y., Pahl P.E. The Pharmaceutical Regulatory Process. CRC Press; Boca Raton, FL, USA: 2004. Food and Drug Administration Modernization Act; pp. 189–264. [Google Scholar]
- 320.Elizabeth O’Connor G. Emerging promotional and pricing approaches in the US pharmaceutical market. J. Product. Brand Manag. 2014;23:572–580. doi: 10.1108/JPBM-08-2014-0684. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 321.DiFeo T.J. Drug product development: A technical review of chemistry, manufacturing, and controls information for the support of pharmaceutical compound licensing activities. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 2003;29:939–958. doi: 10.1081/DDC-120025452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 322.Directive 2001/83/CE of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 November 2001 on the Community code relating to medicinal products for human use. Off. J. Eur. Union. 2004;311:67–128. [Google Scholar]
- 323.Minghetti P., Pantano D., Gennari C.G.M., Casiraghi A. Regulatory framework of pharmaceutical compounding and actual developments of legislation in Europe. Health Policy. 2014;117:328–333. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2014.07.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.