Skip to main content
Medicine logoLink to Medicine
. 2023 Jul 14;102(28):e34199. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000034199

A successful management of fungal peritonitis caused by Rhodotorula glutinis in CAPD patient, coincident with onychomycosis by Penicillium sp: Case report

Steven David Panggabean a,*, Ni Made Hustrini a
PMCID: PMC10344560  PMID: 37443482

Rationale:

Rhodotorula glutinis is a rare cause of fungal peritonitis in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. The combination treatment between aggressive PD catheter replacement and adequate antifungal treatment is crucial in managing peritonitis due to fungal infection and onychomycosis.

Patient concerns:

A 37-year-old man PD patient presented with cloudy effluent, abdominal pain, and black debris in the lumen of his PD catheter. Twelve days before admission, the patient traveled for 10 days to a high-temperature country, Saudi Arabia, for purpose of accomplishing haj. From the physical examinations, there was an onychomycosis in his right toenail.

Diagnoses:

The result of the dialysate cell count confirmed the evidence of peritonitis (i.e., cell count of 187 cells per µL, however with polymorphonuclear 31%). The dialysate culture indicated R glutinis, with no growth of bacteria. Fungal culture of his toenail scrapings was obtained and the result was Penicillium sp.

Interventions:

Based on the high clinical suspicion of fungal peritonitis, fluconazole intraperitoneal (IP) was immediately given on the first day in addition to empirical antibiotics, that is, cefazolin and gentamycin IP. His peritoneal catheter was simultaneously removed and reinserted on the 4th day of treatment. Since there was a sign of fluconazole resistance, fluconazole IP was switched into oral voriconazole, without any antimicrobial treatment intraperitoneally. After 21 days of voriconazole, oral itraconazole was given until 3 months for his onychomycosis.

Outcomes:

Clinical improvement was seen on the effluent where the leucocyte count falls below 100 cells after 21 days of giving voriconazole.

Lessons:

This case report suggests the need for comprehensive evaluations of the risk for fungal infection in continuous ambulatory PD patients, especially those who live in a tropical country.

Keywords: fungal peritonitis, onychomycosis, reinserted catheter, Rhodotorula glutinis

1. Introduction

Fungal peritonitis has a lower prevalence than bacterial peritonitis in patients with peritoneal dialysis (PD),[1,2] however, it has significantly higher mortality.[2] The prevalence of fungal peritonitis in some countries is between 1% and 3% of all-cause peritonitis (<0.01–0.01 episodes per patient year).[1] The highest prevalence of fungal peritonitis had been reported in a tropical country such as India, where the rates were as high as 14.3% of all peritonitis episodes (0.09 episodes per patient year) up to 23.8% of all peritonitis episodes.[3,4] Delayed PD catheter removal was independently associated with mortality in fungal peritonitis patients.[5] Despite technique failure and the mortality rate is still high in early catheter removal,[6] the guideline made a recommendation of immediate PD catheter removal when fungi are identified in PD effluent.[7]

Rhodotorula is a basidiomycetous yeast in the fungal family Sporidiobolaceae; it is an emerging opportunistic pathogen, especially in immunocompromised patients.[8] There were only 11 peritonitis cases related to Rhodotorula sp. infections in PD patients that have been reported up to 2017, where most of them underwent catheter removal and transferred to hemodialysis (HD).[9] Rhodotorula sp. infections could occur at any site of the body,[8] and Rhodotorula glutinis was never reported as an etiology of onychomycosis.[10] We report a case of fungal peritonitis in a PD patient due to R glutinis, his Tenckhoff catheter was removed and reinserted simultaneously, and PD could still be maintained. He also had another site of fungal infection in his toenail, which was a possible risk factor for fungal peritonitis.

2. Case report

A 37-year-old man presented with cloudy effluent, abdominal pain, and black debris appeared in the lumen of his PD catheter. He has been on continuous ambulatory PD for 5 years after 1 year of undergoing HD as his initial kidney replacement therapy. Chronic glomerulonephritis was identified as the etiology of his end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). No previous PD-related infectious complication was reported and his daily ultrafiltration volume range from 700 to 1200 mL with no urine production. He also presented with hypertension secondary to his kidney disease where blood pressure was well controlled with a combination of calcium channel blocker and angiotensin receptor blocker. He had a previous hepatitis C virus infection which was effectively managed with direct-acting antiviral and confirmed as a sustained virologic response.

Twelve days before admission, the patient traveled for 10 days to a high-temperature country, Saudi Arabia, for purpose of accomplishing haj. On the 5th day of the pilgrimage, black debris appeared inside his PD catheter lumen (Fig. 1), some of them fixed inside the catheter and some others flowed out during draining the dialysate. Two days before the debris appeared he admitted that he washed his hand with water only due to his belief to perform the pilgrimage. Cloudy effluent and abdominal pain appeared later, 2 days before admission. No fever was noticed. No inflow nor outflow obstruction was found, therefore he could maintain good ultrafiltration with no sign of fluid retention.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Black debris inside the PD catheter and removal of the catheter. PD = peritoneal dialysis.

He had never history of peritonitis before nor recent antibiotic usage. The result of the dialysate cell count confirmed the evidence of peritonitis (i.e., cell count of 187 cells per µL, however with polymorphonuclear 31%). Based on the high clinical suspicion of fungal peritonitis, fluconazole intraperitoneal (IP) was immediately given on the first day of treatment in addition to empirical antibiotics that is cefazolin and gentamycin IP. We simultaneously removed (also seen on Fig. 1) and reinsertion of his peritoneal catheter on the 4th day of treatment. There was no abdominal pain anymore after the surgery. He was then transferred to regular HD for 2 weeks after the new PD catheter reinsertion.

After the catheter removal, we observed no black debris reappeared in his catheter lumen. R glutinis organism was confirmed from his dialysate culture, with no growth of bacteria. We continued IP fluconazole as well as an empirical antibiotic for up to 21 days. A series of dialysate cultures and leucocyte counts were performed to monitor the progress of the infection (Table 1).

Table 1.

Leucocyte count of effluent, culture, and antimicrobial treatment.

Day-1 Day-4 Day-15 Day-21 Day-25 Day-32 Day-39 Day-44 Day-55 Day-90
Leucocyte count 187 cells/μL 215 cells/μL 279 cells/μL 289 cells/μL 294 cells/μL 124 cells/μL 52 cells/μL 25 cells/μL
PMN 58 cells/μL
(31%)
87 cells/μL
(40.5%)
213 cells/μL
(76.3%)
135 cells/μL
(46.7%)
203 cells/μL
(69.1%)
22 cells/μL
(17.7%)
7 cells/μL
(13.4%)
2 cells/μL
(8%)
MN 129 cells/μL
(69%)
128 cells/μL
(59.5%)
66 cells/μL
(23.7%)
154 cells/μL
(53.3%)
91 cells/μL
(30.9%)
102 cells/μL
(82.3%)
45 cells/μL
(86.6%)
23 cells/μL
(92%)
Culture of effluent Rhodotorula glutinis
No bacteria growth
Sterile Sterile
Culture of Tenckhoff catheter Sterile
Antibiotic Cefazolin 1 × 1 g + Gentamicin 1 × 40 mg, intraperitoneal
Antifungal Fluconazole 1 × 200 mg, intraperitoneal Voriconazole 2 × 200 mg, per oral

MN = mononuclear, PMN = polymorphonuclear.

We observed that there was no growth of any microorganisms after the catheter removal; however, we found no significant improvement in the clarity (Fig. 2) and leucocyte count of the effluent 3 weeks after adequate antimicrobial treatment despite the relatively stable clinical condition.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Progression of the effluent.

We considered that this condition might be related to a fluconazole-resistant status. Therefore we switched fluconazole IP to oral voriconazole, without any antibiotic treatment. Oral voriconazole 200 mg twice daily was started and administered for 21 days. We observed a significant clinical improvement in the effluent where the leucocyte count fall below 100 cells per µL.

We explored the possible risk factors for fungal peritonitis in this patient and we found that he had onychomycosis on his right toenail. There was discoloration and nail plate destruction on his right toenail (Fig. 3). The patient admitted that he unintentionally touched his toenail when performing the dialysate exchange for some time. We did a fungal culture of his toenail scrapings and demonstrated Penicillium sp. microorganism (Fig. 4).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Discoloration and nail plate destruction.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Penicillium sp. from fungal culture of toenail scrapings.

Oral itraconazole was the sensitive antifungal treatment based on his nail’s fungal culture, and was administered for approximately 3 months.

3. Discussion

The highest prevalence of fungal peritonitis was reported in India (14.3%–23.8% of all peritonitis episodes).[3,4] The contribution of fungal peritonitis on PD technique failure and mortality remains high.[6] There is a wide spectrum of fungi as causative organisms of fungal peritonitis, that is yeast, hyaline mold, and non-hyaline mold, with approximately 80 fungal species being potential causative organisms.[11] Candida belongs to the yeast family and is the predominant cause (65.1%–100%) of fungal peritonitis.[24,6,12] Our case demonstrated a R glutinis-related PD peritonitis that was successfully managed with voriconazole and catheter removal.

Rhodotorula is a basidiomycetous yeast in the fungal family Sporidiobolaceae. It is widespread and commonly found in air, ocean water, lakes, soil, fruit juice, and milk.[8,13] Rhodotorula is a temporary commensal microorganism of the nails, skin, gastrointestinal, urinary, and respiratory tracts in humans.[13,14] In the past this yeast was considered a nonpathogenic microorganism, but now it has emerged as an opportunistic causative agent, especially in immunocompromised patients.[14,15]

There were various clinical presentations of Rhodotorula infections such as central venous catheter-associated infections, fungemia, endocarditis, ocular infection, central nervous system infections, and peritonitis in PD patients. Most of the patients (87%) with Rhodotorula infection had underlying immunosuppressive conditions (i.e., prolonged corticosteroid use, acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, neutropenia, and malnutrition) and cancer.[8]

There were 11 cases of peritonitis PD patients caused by Rhodotorula, 4 of them (36.3 %) had specific immunocompromised conditions (2 patients with diabetes mellitus, 1 patient with immunosuppressive therapy, 1 patient with human immunodeficiency virus infection).[9] Our patient had no history of diabetes mellitus nor immunosuppressive therapy, his human immunodeficiency virus screening was negative, and he also had no leucopenia or neutropenia. But it is important that we have to consider that ESKD patients are immunocompromised patients.

In ESKD patients, both defective renal metabolic activities and impaired glomerular filtration result in the accumulation of uremic toxins interfering with the immune system. The proneness of ESKD patients to have infections due to the decreased phagocytosis of polymorphonuclear leucocytes (eosinophil, basophil, and neutrophil) is caused by factors such as uremic toxins, iron overload, and anemia of renal disease. Neutrophils have an essential role in the defense against bacterial and fungal infections.[16]

The genus Rhodotorula includes 8 species, some of which can cause disease in humans such as Rhodotorula mucilaginosa, R glutinis, Rhodotorula rubra, and Rhodotorula minuta. Two species that is R glutinis and R minuta are less frequently isolated from natural environments, compared to R mucilaginosa.[13] Two species of Rhodotorula had been reported in 11 peritonitis PD patients, R mucilaginosa in 4 patients, and R rubra in 7 patients.[9] Our PD patient demonstrated R. glutinis that caused peritonitis, the first ever reported case of peritonitis PD patient. Although it was rare, R. glutinis had been reported in other site infections such as fungemia, ocular infection, and central nervous infection cases.[8]

There are some potential causes of black-stained PD tubing except for peritonitis. Contamination of spilled-out povidone-iodine solution during transfer set change might be the frequent cause. Other potential causes were inadequate dialysis, low serum albumin, transfer set soaking with antiseptics, dressing technique, and the existence of dry abdomen period.[17]

Removal and reinsertion of the PD catheter were done simultaneously based on consideration of clinically stable condition, adequate PD, and no sign of systemic infection. A study of 11 cases of Rhodotorula infection in peritonitis PD patients found that the majority of patients conducted catheter removal (7 patients), 2 patients were simultaneously removed and reinserted the catheter, and 2 patients had no catheter removal. One of the patients that received a simultaneous procedure continued successful PD like our patient, but another patient had bowel adhesion and dialysis failed furthermore.[9] In our opinion for a peritonitis PD patient caused by Rhodotorula infection, it may be considered to do simultaneous catheter removal and reinsertion if the clinical patient condition is stable.

International Society of Peritoneal Dialysis guidelines recommend voriconazole as an alternative antifungal treatment for fluconazole-resistant species,[7] but until now there is no report concerning voriconazole treatment associated with Rhodotorula sp. infection both in PD-related infections or at any site of infections.[8,9] We chose to administer voriconazole as the alternative treatment after an assumption of a fluconazole-resistant state. Oral voriconazole penetrates well into peritoneal fluid with minimal peritoneal clearance, therefore no dosage adjustment is needed for PD patients.[18]

Eight patients out of 11 cases reported with Rhodotorula peritonitis in PD patients were treated with Amphotericin B.[9] We did not use Amphotericin B due to its nephrotoxic effect and intravenous administration, while our patient was stable therefore no need for the hospital stay.

Our case is the first report of a successful Rhodotorula-associated PD peritonitis treated with voriconazole. Fungal peritonitis has a high mortality rate and technical failure, even though there are improvements after catheter removal.[5,6] In serial 11 cases of Rhodotorula peritonitis, only 1 died by aspiration pneumonia, not because of peritonitis complication.[9] In systemic infection of Rhodotorula, the mortality rate of fungemia was as high as 14.4%.[8] We found that in our patient after the catheter removal, his condition was clinically stable, although the effluent cell count was improved slowly. Catheter removal remains the key point in the management of Rhodotorula peritonitis in PD patients to prevent mortality.

Our patient did not have common predisposition factors for fungal peritonitis in PD patients. His onychomycosis was another site of fungal infections, but we could not conclude it was the risk factor because the fungal culture of toenail scrapings of our patient demonstrated Penicillium sp., different from his effluent. We planned oral itraconazole 200 mg per day for 3 months based on the antifungal resistance test. R. glutinis infection of the nail was reported in a 74-year-old woman. Oral itraconazole was given for her antifungal therapy and clinical recovery was detected.[10]

There are no studies that reported the correlation between other sites of fungal infection such as onychomycosis with the incidence of fungal peritonitis in PD patients. Data from HD patients, the prevalence of onychomycosis was higher than in the general population.[19] Toenail scraping cultures of fungal were positive in 19.7% of patients with dystrophic nail changes in HD patients.[20] Considering the immune dysfunction due to uremia in HD and PD patients, the study of onychomycosis in PD patients is essential because it may be one of the risk factors of fungal peritonitis.

4. Conclusion

This is the first report of R glutinis-associated PD peritonitis successfully managed with an aggressive PD catheter replacement and adequate antifungal treatment. Comprehensive evaluations of the risk for fungal infection in continuous ambulatory PD patients are necessary especially those who live in a tropical country.

Author contributions

Conceptualization: Steven David Panggabean, Ni Made Hustrini.

Data curation: Steven David Panggabean.

Investigation: Steven David Panggabean, Ni Made Hustrini.

Methodology: Ni Made Hustrini.

Validation: Steven David Panggabean, Ni Made Hustrini.

Visualization: Steven David Panggabean.

Writing – original draft: Steven David Panggabean.

Writing – review & editing: Ni Made Hustrini.

Abbreviations:

ESKD
end-stage kidney disease,
HD
hemodialysis
IP
intraperitoneal
PD
peritoneal dialysis.

The authors have no funding to disclose.

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of the case details and accompanying images.

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available, but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

How to cite this article: Panggabean SD, Hustrini NM. A successful management of fungal peritonitis caused by Rhodotorula glutinis in CAPD patient, coincident with onychomycosis by Penicillium sp: Case report. Medicine 2023;102:28(e34199).

References

  • [1].Perl J, Fuller DS, Bieber BA, et al. Peritoneal dialysis-related infection rates and outcomes: results from the Peritoneal Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (PDOPPS). Am J Kidney Dis. 2020;76:42–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2].Hu S, Tong R, Bo Y, et al. Fungal peritonitis in peritoneal dialysis: 5-year review from a North China center. Infection. 2019;47:35–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [3].Prasad KN, Prasad N, Gupta A, et al. Fungal peritonitis in patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis: a single centre Indian experience. J Infect. 2004;48:96–101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [4].Ram R, Swarnalatha G, Neela P, et al. Fungal peritonitis in patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis: a single-centre experience in India. Nephron Clin Pract. 2008;110:c207–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [5].Chang TI, Kim HW, Park JT, et al. Early catheter removal improves patient survival in peritoneal dialysis patients with fungal peritonitis: results of ninety-four episodes of fungal peritonitis at a single center. Perit Dial Int. 2011;31:60–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [6].Nadeau-Fredette A-C, Bargman JM. Characteristics and outcomes of fungal peritonitis in a modern North American cohort. Perit Dial Int. 2015;35:78–84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [7].Li PKT, Chow KM, Cho Y, et al. ISPD peritonitis guideline recommendations: 2022 update on prevention and treatment. Perit Dial Int. 2022;42:110–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [8].Tuon FF, Costa SF. Rhodotorula infection. A systematic review of 128 cases from literature. Rev Iberoam Micol. 2008;25:135–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [9].Franconieri F, Bonhomme J, Doriot A, et al. Fungal peritonitis caused by Rhodotorula mucilaginosa in a CAPD patient treated with liposomal amphotericin B: a case report and literature review. Perit Dial Int. 2018;38:69–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [10].Altun HU, Meral T, Aribas ET, et al. A case of onychomycosis caused by Rhodotorula glutinis. Case Rep Dermatol Med. 2014;2014:563261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [11].Kanjanabuch T, Nopsopon T, Chatsuwan T, et al. Predictors and outcomes of peritoneal dialysis-related infections due to filamentous molds (MycoPDICS). PLoS One. 2022;17:e0268823. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [12].Auricchio S, Giovenzana ME, Pozzi M, et al. Fungal peritonitis in peritoneal dialysis: a 34-year single centre evaluation. Clin Kidney J. 2018;11:874–80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [13].Wirth F, Goldani LZ. Epidemiology of Rhodotorula: an emerging pathogen. Interdiscip Perspect Infect Dis. 2012;2012:465717. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [14].Agarwal S, Raghvan C, Gupta DK, et al. Clinical and microbiological characteristics of Rhodotorula mucilaginosa infections in a tertiary-care facility. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2014;32:304–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [15].Hazen KC. New and emerging yeast pathogens. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1995;8:462–78. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [16].Cohen G. Immune dysfunction in uremia 2020. Toxins (Basel). 2020;12:439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [17].Pongpirul K, Pongpirul WA, Kanjanabuch T. Potential causes of black-stained peritoneal dialysis tubing: an analysis from nurse practitioner’s prospect. BMC Res Notes. 2014;7:434. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [18].Peng LW, Lien YH. Pharmacokinetics of single, oral-dose voriconazole in peritoneal dialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis. 2005;45:162–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [19].Gupta AK, Daigle D, Foley KA. The prevalence of culture-confirmed toenail onychomycosis in at-risk patient populations. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2015;29:1039–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [20].Kuvandik G, Cetin M, Genctoy G, et al. The prevalence, epidemiology and risk factors for onychomycosis in hemodialysis patients. BMC Infect Dis. 2007;7:102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Medicine are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer Health

RESOURCES