Skip to main content
Data in Brief logoLink to Data in Brief
. 2023 Jun 23;49:109336. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2023.109336

Whole proteome copy number dataset in primary mouse cortical neurons

Odetta Antico a,b,1, Raja S Nirujogi a,b,1, Miratul MK Muqit a,b,
PMCID: PMC10344827  PMID: 37456110

Abstract

The functional diversity of neurons is specified through their proteome resulting in elaborate and tightly regulated protein interaction networks and signalling that regulates neuronal processes. Dysregulation of these dynamic networks in development or in adulthood lead to neurodevelopmental or neurological disorders respectively. Over the past few decades, mass spectrometry has become a powerful tool for quantifying and resolving any proteome, including complex tissues such as the brain proteome, with technological advances leading to higher levels of resolution and throughput than traditional biochemical techniques.

In this article, we provide a proteomic reference dataset that has been generated to identify proteins and quantify their level of expression in primary mouse cortical neurons. It represents a summary analysis of previously published data in (Antico et al., 2021).

Mouse cortical neurons were isolated from E16.5 C57Bl/6J mice and cultured for 21 days in vitro (DIV). We employed the mitochondrial uncouplers AntimycinA/Oligomycin (AO) to induce mitochondrial depolarisation that is a well-established paradigm to assess mitophagic signalling. Total lysates from mouse primary cortical neurons were subjected to label-free quantitative proteomic analysis using both data dependent acquisition (DDA) and data independent acquisition (DIA) modes. DDA proteomic analysis identified a total dataset of 9367 proteins in mouse cortical neurons and absolute abundance of proteins was calculated as copy numbers per cell. DDA dataset was also processed to generate a reference spectral library to fit in and quantify MS spectra generated in DIA mode. Quantitative DIA analysis identified more than 6000 protein groups and statistical comparison of the two analysed groups (untreated and AO-treated) revealed that the neuronal proteome was largely unchanged post mitochondrial depolarisation for 5 hours. To our knowledge, these files represent the most comprehensive DDA and DIA reference datasets of fully functional maturated mouse primary cortical neurons and serve as a valuable resource for further investigating the role of specific proteins involved in neurobiology and neurological disorders such as Alzheimer's disease (AD), Parkinson's disease (PD) and Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD).

Keywords: Copy Number Variation (CNV), Neuronal proteome, Label-free quantification, Neurodegenerative disease, Kinases, phosphatases, E3-ligases, Deubiquitinases (DUBs)


Specifications Table

Subject Biochemistry
Neuroscience
Specific subject area Proteomics
Neuroscience: Cellular and Molecular
Type of data Table
Graph
Figure
Excel file of processed data
How the data were acquired Thermo Scientific Orbitrap Exploris 480 mass spectrometer coupled to a Dionex 3000 RSLC nanoflow high-performance liquid chromatography system.
Data format Raw data- Supplementary table (10.5281/zenodo.8023364)
Processed data tables
Filtered
Description of data collection Trypsin digested proteins from primary mouse cortical neuronal cultures were fractionated using high-pH RPLC fractionation (45 fractions) and used for data-dependent acquisition (DDA) analysis.
The DDA data were also used to generate a high-quality spectral library using Spectronaut version 15 (Biognosys) pulsar search engine. This spectral library was used for Data independent acquisition (DIA) proteomic analysis. The detailed protocol was previously described in dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.bs3tngnn, dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.busynwfw and (Nirujogi et al., 2021).
Data source location MRC Protein Phosphorylation and Ubiquitylation Unit, School of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom.
Data accessibility Mass spectrometry data can be accessed either with this article or via the PRIDE partner repository (ProteomeXchange Consortium) with the dataset identifier PXD027614.
https://www.ebi.ac.uk/pride/archive/projects/PXD027614
Related research article Antico O, Ordureau A, Stevens M, Singh F, Nirujogi RS, Gierlinski M, Barini E, Rickwood ML, Prescott A, Toth R, Ganley IG, Harper JW, Muqit MMK. Global ubiquitylation analysis of mitochondria in primary neurons identifies endogenous Parkin targets following activation of PINK1. Sci Adv. 2021 Nov 12;7(46):eabj0722. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abj0722.

1. Value of the Data

  • This data presents a valuable and in-depth resource of the mouse primary cortical neuronal proteome and allows for the identification of proteins expressed in terminally differentiated neurons.

  • The data provides absolute copy number quantification of core neuronal proteins as well as major signalling pathways associated with neurodegenerative disorders.

  • This data represents a comprehensive catalogue of mouse neuronal proteins that can be interrogated by researchers to identify proteins of interest in a neuronal context and their relative amount of expression and to further examine the network complexity of molecular pathways involved in neuronal signalling and/or pivotal mechanisms linked to neuronal stress.

  • This proteomic data can be used to (1) check expression of targets of drug discovery and encourage pilot hypothesis-driven studies in primary neurons; (2) identify protein biomarkers and; (3) to study neuronal pathways in physiological conditions and pathological disorders.

  • This data also determines protein concentration at endogenous levels, whose information will be critical for understanding the stoichiometry relations between different proteins involved in same pathway or mechanism, and for studying physiological processes in vitro.

2. Objective

The fundamental objective was to produce a proteome-derived resource dataset that quantified expression of proteins derived from terminally differentiated mouse cortical neuronal cultures.

This dataset will enable quantitative analysis of protein expression in mouse cortical neurons and allow comparative analysis with different cell types derived from other cultured primary cells.

This deep proteomic analysis of mouse cortical neurons was undertaken as part of a project published by [1] related to Parkinson's-linked proteins, PINK1 and Parkin. The dataset provides a general resource for Parkinson's as it defines expression of other Parkinson's-encoded proteins including SNCA, PARK7/DJ1, VPS35, VPS13C, ATP13A2 and LRRK2 that will be of interest to the Parkinson's field more widely. It will also be a resource for related brain disorders including Alzheimer's disease and Autism Spectrum Disorder.

3. Data Description

The data presented in this article aim to profile a dataset of expressed proteins in cultured terminal differentiated mouse cortical neurons. Mature primary neuronal cultures model the physiology of cells in-vivo and therefore represent a tractable system to study molecular mechanisms related to the physiological and pathophysiological functions of neuronal networks. Neuronal progenitors were isolated from E16.5 mouse cortices (C57BL/6J) and cultured for 21 days in vitro. To further investigate whether mitochondrial stress induces changes in the neuronal proteome, mouse cortical neurons were stimulated at 21 DIV with a combination of Antimycin/Oligomycin (10μM / 1μM) to induce mitochondrial depolarisation for 5 hours. Three biological replicates (in technical duplicate) per condition were trypsin digested using the S-Trap assisted sample preparation followed by LC-MS/MS analysis. The workflow used to isolate and culture mouse cortical neurons, for sample preparation, data acquisition and analysis is outlined in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Fig 1

Experimental design to quantify proteins in mouse primary cortical neurons. Mouse cortical neurons were generated from E16.5 mouse cortices (C57BL/6J) and cultured for 21 DIV until terminal maturation. Neurons were treated with AO and DMSO for 5 hours to induce mitochondrial depolarisation (three biological replicate, in technical duplicates, for each condition). Protein lysates were prepared in SDS buffer and neuron peptides generated by trypsin digestion. Total cortical neuron peptides were fractionated in 45 fraction and subjected to LC-MS/MS analysis with Orbitrap Exploris . The neuronal proteome was analysed with 2 different acquisition modes: DDA-Data Dependent acquisition and DIA -Data independent acquisition. Spectral library was generated from DDA data and used for quantification of DIA proteins.

A shotgun label-free quantification (LFQ) proteomics was performed, and 45 high-pH peptide fractions were analysed on an Orbitrap Exploris 480 mass spectrometer acquired in a MS raw data were searched using MS-Fragger software suite (version 3.2) [2], identified a total dataset of 9367 proteins in mouse cortical neurons and the data was classified into several cellular subsets of proteins relevant for the biological pathways in neurons and to determine the specific level of protein abundance. Further, the data was processed using Perseus software suite [3] to calculate protein copy numbers using histone-based proteomic ruler method used to quantitatively determine protein levels by copy numbers of proteins [4].

Proteins were grouped into 10 classes based on function; subcellular localisation; and gene-risk associated-diseases (Table 1). This classification enabled us to identify 316 kinases, 209 phosphatases and 711 proteins related to ubiquitin pathways, including E3-ligases and deubiquitinases. The top 25 most abundant proteins and 25 least abundant proteins of Serine/Threonine (Ser/Thr) kinases, phosphatases, E3-ligases and deubiquitinases identified in mouse cortical neurons with their relative copy number intensity are listed in Table 2. This dataset also contained proteins involved in glycosylation (183 proteins) and metabolic pathways (1737 proteins). That dataset is also amenable to subcellular localisation expression profiling, for example we identified 403 lysosomal proteins and 931 mitochondrial proteins (Table 1), and this analysis can be extended to other organelles, such as peroxisome, Golgi apparatus and endoplasmic reticulum.

Table 1.

Protein classification identified in mouse cortical neurons. Proteins were classified based on Uniprot annotation and literature references reported in the table. Alzheimer's disease (AD), Parkinson's disease (PD) and Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD).

Classification Number of proteins References
Kinases 316 [5,6]
 Phosphatases 209 [7]
 Ub components 711 [8,9]
 Glycosylation 183 [10]
 Metabolism 1737 https://metabolicatlas.org
Lysosomes 403 [11]
 Mitochondria 931 [12]
 AD 47 [13]
 PD 22 [14]
 ASD 85 [15]

Table 2.

The most abundant and least abundant proteins in mouse cortical neurons. Neuronal proteins were classified and searched for serine/threonine (Ser/Thr) kinases, phosphatase, E3-ligases and Deubiquitinases. The 25 most abundant and least abundant proteins for each category is reported with their relative copy number intensity. The full list can be searched in the Supplementary table.

Top 25 proteins
Ser/Thr Kinases
Phosphatases
E3-ligases
Deubiquitinases
Gene Names Copy number Intensity Gene Names Copy number Intensity Gene Names Copy number Intensity Gene Names Copy number Intensity
Camk2a 3317842.58 Pgam1 1798634.37 Cacybp 515547,10 Uchl1 5714448.04
Camk2d 3185173.61 Ppp2r1a 854035.26 Skp1 511569,95 Otub1 785369.54
Camk2b 2969601.09 Pgam2 802371.74 Prpf19 179958,67 Uchl3 321454.91
Camk2g 2616152.52 Ppp3ca 760020.84 Rbx1 169664,79 Cops6 243962.68
Prkaca 1071633.62 Ppp2cb 717862.45 Trim28 126308,80 Ufc1 229077.67
Prkacb 1068027.11 Ppp2ca 717197.17 Trim2 97168,579 Psmd14 207401.28
Mapk1 1008711.93 Ppp1cc 667396.53 Marchf5 92901,443 Eif3f 172908.88
Mapk3 801052.76 Ppp1cb 657960.61 Rnf146 84911,11 Psmd7 135499.18
Nek6 600971.10 Ppp1ca 657511.81 Fbxo2 82398,91 Usp5 130045.04
Map2k1 335619.99 Ppp3cb 650055.00 Stub1 77661,35 Cops5 129067.14
Csnk2a2 332256.56 Ppp3r1 634752.90 Fbxl16 75091,29 Trim28 126308.80
Csnk2a1 312767.91 Nudt3 576152.38 Trim3 73430,40 Eif3h 118747.56
Mapk9 304336.97 Ppa1 569447.94 Ppp1r11 52708,60 Usp14 111636.93
Camkv 302724.87 Acp1 449663.94 Rnf14 50471,25 Uchl5 94074.43
Gsk3b 296476.99 Ppp3cc 410028.63 Nedd4 48190,53 Otub2 48130.60
Cdk9 246610.74 Dusp3 309834.65 Sarm1 43719,05 Usp10 35708.09
Cdk5 244572.26 Nudt10 307062.25 Ddb1 42772,67 Usp46 29426.69
Prkcg 229662.64 Impa1 304598.61 Cul3 42568,15 Otud6b 29155.23
Nlk 177133.97 Pgam5 283464.87 Faf2 42316,56 Stambp 22022.21
Mapk8 173965.76 Itpa 273085.32 Rnf7 42154,63 Usp12 20836.70
Gsk3a 169992.14 Ppp1r7 269556.07 Ube3a 42103,70 Usp7 18973.79
Map2k2 154213.12 Nudt4 255477.27 Pex10 37815,97 Usp9x 16536.66
Src 144561.37 Ppp2r1b 252342.32 Trim9 35129,50 Usp15 15292.21
Pak3 143445.85 Nudt2 237527.98 Cul2 32826,63 Usp39 15231.95
Pak2 137970.30 Set 221122.73 Cul5 27509,64 Mindy4 14679.13

Bottom 25 proteins

Irak4 640,29 Impa2 1950,11 Trim47 471,76 Usp54 2728,53
Mertk 629,86 Ssh1 1942,22 Paxip1 444,25 Otud4 2456,73
Bub1b 583,06 Ppp1r16b 1935,67 Rnft2 403,76 Usp48 2382,84
Ryk 534,16 Inpp4b 1673,33 Rnft1 403,75 Josd2 2326,45
Map4k2 506,56 Ptpru 1659,44 Neurl2 388,90 Rcbtb2 2315,90
Trpm7 481,88 Phlpp2 1567,44 Trim65 365,57 Otud5 1829,44
Pdik1l 481,17 Ptpn21 1477,70 Klhl24 356,77 Bap1 1720,80
Tgfbr1 379,72 Dusp8 1345,19 Trim56 337,62 Usp33 1659,73
Atm 378,14 Dolpp1 1041,55 Polk 313,09 Usp29 1650,98
Syk 357,09 Ppm1d 876,07 Znf511 301,15 Usp2 1439,60
Fgfr2 303,05 Pxylp1 821,37 Det1 294,77 Usp38 1308,99
Chek2 284,87 Rpap2 786,93 Rnf145 279,54 Mpnd 1128,21
Stk40 247,21 Ppp1r3c 757,13 Znf451 261,82 Usp34 959,06
Tyk2 226,50 Ptprm 742,88 Marchf7 209,61 Usp45 898,21
Hunk 203,71 Ptpn3 741,15 Rnf213 192,56 Usp28 897,82
Prkdc 191,03 Phlpp1 730,99 Map3k1 175,31 Usp43 801,00
Stk32a 189,66 Styx 719,67 Rmnd5b 167,83 Otud3 744,85
Map3k1 175,30 Dusp7 690,11 Kmt2d 159,43 Usp21 610,33
Wee1 170,25 Lpin1 687,44 Rnf168 154,86 Usp16 497,08
Eif2ak1 161,93 Inpp5e 626,24 Mpg 117,60 Usp6nl 437,68
Atr 161,92 Ppef1 448,25 Rnf180 83,61 Usp36 423,22
Ttk 155,35 Dusp11 413,15 Rnf217 55,52 Usp42 251,36
Lrrk2 133,03 Pon1 151,14 Marchf11 46,95 Mysm1 225,42
Hipk1 93,96 Ptpn13 118,74 Trim39 41,32 Usp40 214,33
Pask 41,91 Eya4 64,59 Znf521 7,37 Zranb1 191,56

This multifaceted analysis was also expanded to classify proteins linked to genetic disease risk for neurological disorders. In mouse cortical neurons, distinct sets of proteins encoded by disease risk genes included: 47 AD-related genes, 22 PD-related genes and 85 ASD-related genes (Table 1). The top 15 proteins encoded by genes for each disease were reported with their relative copy number intensity and concentration (Table 3).

Table 3.

Proteins encoded by at risk genes for neurological disease identified in mouse cortical neurons. The top 15 proteins for each disease were described and reported with relative copy number intensity and concentration. Alzheimer's disease (AD), Parkinson's disease (PD) and Autism Spectrum disorder (ASD). The full list of gene risk associated-proteins can be found in the Supplementary table.

UNIPROT
ID
Risk-genes Description Copy number Intensity Concentration [nM]
Alzheimer's disease (AD) P10637 Mapt Microtubule-associated protein tau 931561.53 2972.99
P08226 Apoe Apolipoprotein E 807580.03 2577.31
P17665 Cox7c Cytochrome c oxidase subunit 7C, mitochondrial 591958.26 1889.18
P10605 Ctsb Cathepsin B 381539.17 1217.65
Q7M6Y3 Picalm Phosphatidylinositol-binding clathrin assembly protein 199646.30 637.15
O08539 Bin1 Myc box-dependent-interacting protein 1 104298.26 332.88
Q9WV80 Snx1 Sorting nexin-1 51377.50 163.97
P60060 Sec61g Protein transport protein Sec61 subunit gamma 50420.77 160.91
G5E8K5 Ank3 Ankyrin-3 45591.86 145.50
Q06890 Clu Clusterin 39516.43 126.11
P12023 App Amyloid-beta A4 protein 39239,99 125,23
Q8CIB5 Fermt2 Fermitin family homolog 2 39191,99 125,08
O55033 Nck2 Cytoplasmic protein NCK2 26043,71 83,12
P97411 Ica1 Islet cell autoantigen 1 25819,95 82,40
Q80 × 71 Tmem106b Transmembrane protein 106B 25286,44 80,70

Parkinson's disease (PD) Q9R0P9 Uchl1 Ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase isozyme L1 5714448.04 18237.12
O55042 Snca Alpha-synuclein 4734736.75 15110.47
Q9EQH3 Vps35 Vacuolar protein sorting-associated protein 35 173786.37 554.62
Q9JIY5 Htra2 Serine protease HTRA2, mitochondrial 101714.09 324.61
Q9D1L0 Chchd2 Coiled-coil-helix-coiled-coil-helix domain-containing protein 2 82844.20 264.39
Q8CHC4 Synj1 Synaptojanin-1 55322.43 176.56
P17439 Gba Lysosomal acid glucosylceramidase 48017.66 153.24
Q80TZ3 Dnajc6 Putative tyrosine-protein phosphatase auxilin 47401.40 151.28
Q6NZJ6 Eif4g1 Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4 gamma 1 40337.90 128.73
P50428 Arsa Arylsulfatase A 28139.97 89.81
Q8CIB6 Tmem230 Transmembrane protein 230 21644,46 69,08
Q04519 Smpd1 Sphingomyelin phosphodiesterase 20828,19 66,47
Q9WVS6 Prkn E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase parkin 18235,23 58,20
Q99KY4 Gak Cyclin-G-associated kinase 9020,20 28,79
Q3U7U3 Fbxo7 F-box only protein 7 6536,53 20,86

Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) O08553 Dpysl2 Dihydropyrimidinase-related protein 2 5676905.37 18117.31
B2RSH2 Gnai1 Guanine nucleotide-binding protein G(i) subunit alpha-1 3360566.06 10724.93
O08599 Stxbp1 Syntaxin-binding protein 1 1544436.05 4928.92
P62743 Ap2s1 AP-2 complex subunit sigma 606823.54 1936.62
O89053 Coro1a Coronin-1A 435622.39 1390.24
Q60900 Elavl3 ELAV-like protein 3 294940.38 941.27
P03995 Ctnnb1 Catenin beta-1 139727.82 445.93
Q02248 Map1a Microtubule-associated protein 1A 133208.60 425.12
Q9QYR6 Gria2 Glutamate receptor 2 115444.02 368.43
P23819 Slc6a1 Sodium- and chloride-dependent GABA transporter 1 108231.86 345.41
Q60676 Ppp5c Serine/threonine-protein phosphatase 5 91262,77 291,26
P63080 Gabrb3 Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit beta-3 85522,87 272,94
P0DI97 Nrxn1 Neurexin-1-beta 83346,00 265,99
Q9Z1D1 Eif3g Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit G 69047,20 220,36
Q9JHU4 Dync1h1 Cytoplasmic dynein 1 heavy chain 1 64145,40 204,71

This dataset also enables proteomic snapshots of neuronal processes. As neurons have a high compartmentalized signalling network and synaptic transmission is one of the key neuronal processes, a systematic examination was carried out for synaptic proteins. The most representative synaptic proteins identified in this dataset were clustered in the different stages of neurotransmission and shown in Fig. 2. The dataset also enabled analysis of the stoichiometry and the reciprocal proportion of the synaptic proteins connected in the same pathway or phase of neuronal process. This analysis can be extended to others cellular processes, such as neuronal metabolism and neuronal protein turnover.

Fig. 2.

Fig 2

Snapshot of synaptic proteins identified in mouse cortical neurons. Representative image of clustering synaptic proteins found in mature primary cortical neurons. Proteins were categorised based on their subcellular localisation and role in neurotransmission.

A DDA spectral library was also generated from 45 high-pH fractions of mouse cortical neuronal extracts using MS-Fragger search algorithm. In parallel, sample fractions were acquired and analysed in Data-Independent acquisition mode (DIA acquisition scheme reported in Supplementary table). DIA spectra were identified and quantified using the spectral library generated from DDA data.

4. Experimental Design, Materials and Methods

4.1. Mouse cortical neuronal preparation from C57BL/6J mice

The C57BL/6J (RRID:IMSR_JAX:000664) mice were obtained from Charles River Laboratories (Kent-UK) and housed in a pathogen–free facility with temperature-controlled rooms at 21°C and 45 to 65% relative humidity, 12-hour light/12-hour dark cycles and supplied food and water ad libitum.

A detailed protocol describing the preparation of primary cortical mouse neurons has been published (http://dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.bswanfae) . In brief, cortices were isolated from E16.5 embryos and tissue digestion was performed by incubation with trypsin-EDTA at 37°C for 30 min. Cortical neurons were plated at a density of 5.0 × 105 cells per well on poly-L-Lysine coated six-well plates and cultured in neuronal media: Neurobasal medium, 1X B27 supplement, 1X GlutaMAX, and 1X penicillin-streptomycin. Neurons were cultured in a water-saturated incubator at 37°C and 5% CO2 for 21 days and medium was partially replaced every 5 days for 1/3 of the total volume.

4.2. Sample preparation for copy number proteomics

Technical duplicates of three biological replicates of mouse neurons were treated for 5 hours with 10 μM Antimycin A and 1 μM oligomycin (AO) in DMSO at 37°C (n = 6 AO and n = 6 DMSO). Cells were lysed in buffer containing Tris-HCl (10 mM, pH 8.0), SDS (2%, w/v), sodium orthovanadate (1 mM), sodium glycerophosphate (10 mM), sodium fluoride (50 mM), sodium pyrophosphate (5 mM), protease inhibitor cocktail, and microcystin-LR (1 μg/ml). Lysates were boiled for 10 min at 95°C and then sonicated using Bioruptor for 10 min (30-s on and 30-s off, 10 cycles) at 4°C. Samples were centrifuged at 20,000 x g for 20 min at 4°C. Supernatants were collected and protein concentration was determined by using the BCA kit (Pierce).

The mass spectrometry workflow and methods used in this study, are described in detail in dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.bs3tngnn, dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.busynwfw and [16]. Briefly, an S-Trap protocol was used for either 50 μg of protein for each single AO- and DMSO-treated sample or 300 μg of pooled cortical neurons. Briefly, sample reduction was performed with 10 mM TCEP and alkylation with 40 mM Iodoacetamide. Samples were loaded on S-Trap micro and mini columns and purified by washing with S-Trap wash buffer [100 mM TEABC (pH 7.2) in 90% methanol] four times. Peptide digestion was done using Lys-C ± trypsin at 1:20 ratio and incubated at 47°C for 1.2 hours following overnight incubation at room temperature. Peptides were sequentially eluted using 50 mM TEABC buffer, 0.15% formic acid (v/v), and 80% acetonitrile (ACN) in 0.15% formic acid (v/v) and vacuum-dried. For the pooled cortical neuron, peptides generated after trypsin digestion, were subjected to high-pH RPLC fractionation to generate 45 fractions and used for data-dependent acquisition (DDA) analysis. AO- and DMSO-treated samples were dissolved in LC buffer [3% ACN in 0.1% formic acid (v/v)], and 2 μg of peptide amount was injected for DIA analysis.

4.3. Copy number total proteomic analysis using DDA and DIA

Copy number analysis and DDA method are described in [4]. Orbitrap Exploris 480 mass spectrometer coupled in line with Dionex 3000 RSLC nano liquid chromatography (LC) system was used to analyse the 45 high-pH fractions. Sample was injected onto trap column (Acclaim PepMap 2 cm, 3 μm particle) and separated on a 50-cm analytical column at 300 nl/ min (ES803; 50 cm, C18 2μm particle) and directly electrosprayed into the mass spectrometer using EASY nanoLC source.

Data were acquired in a DDA mode by acquiring full MS at 60,000 resolution at a mass/charge ratio (m/z) of 200 and analyzed using Orbitrap mass analyzer. MS2 data were acquired at top speed for 2s to acquire as many data-dependent scans by using 1.2-Da isolation window using quadrupole mass filter and fragmented using normalized 30% high-energy collision-induced dissociation (HCD); the MS fragment ion was measured at 15,000 resolution at 200 m/z using Orbitrap mass analyzer. Automatic gain control (AGC) targets for MS1 were set at 300% and MS2 at 100% with a maximum ion-injection accumulation time at 25 and 80 ms, respectively.

For the DIA analysis, peptide amount from each of the AO-treated and DMSO-treated cortical neuron samples were acquired on an Orbitrap Exploris 480 mass spectrometer. Peptides were loaded on trap column and eluted on an analytical column by using a nonlinear gradient of 120 min and a total of 145-min run. MS1 data were acquired at 120,000 resolution at 200 m/z and measured using Orbitrap mass analyzer. Variable DIA scheme was used by using a Quadrupole mass filter in the mass range of 400 to 1500 m/z. A total of 45 variable isolation windows employed per duty cycle and peptide precursor ions were fragmented using a normalized steeped HCD collision energy (26, 28, and 30) and measured at 30,000 resolution at m/z of 200 using Orbitrap mass analyzer. AGC targets for MS1 were set at 300% and for MS2 at 3000% with a maximum ion-injection accumulation time of 25 and 80 ms, respectively. The completed variable DIA window schemes and instrument settings are provided in the Supplementary table and have been deposited at Zenodo (doi:10.5281/zenodo.8023364).

4.4. Mass spectrometry data analysis

DDA raw MS data were processed using Frag pipe software suite (version 15.0- https://fragpipe.nesvilab.org/) using an in-built MS-Fragger search algorithm (version 3.2) [2,17]. Default closed search workflow was used and searched against Mouse UniProt database (2021-03-18-decoys-reviewed-contam-UP000000589.fas-https://ftp.uniprot.org/pub/databases/uniprot/previous_major_releases/release-2021_03/). Precursor mass tolerance was set at −50 and ±50 ppm (parts per million), and fragment mass tolerance was set at 20 ppm.

MS1 quantification was performed using MS-Fragger version 3.2 with an in-built IonQuant algorithm (https://github.com/Nesvilab/IonQuant; doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8098825) by allowing match between runs. One percent false discovery rate (FDR) at peptide-spectrum match (PSM), peptide, and protein level was applied for the final output files. Protein group table was further processed using Perseus software suite (v1.6.15.0- http://www.perseus-framework.org - RRID:SCR_015753) to estimate copy numbers using histone proteomic ruler [3,4]. The DDA data were used to generate a spectral library using Spectronaut version 15 (Biognosys - https://biognosys.com/software/spectronaut/)  pulsar search engine [18]. This library was used for the library-based search for DIA data by using the default search parameters and enabling cross-run normalization. The search output protein group table was exported and processed using Perseus for further analysis. Statistical analysis was completed using a Student T tests with 1% permutation-based FDR for the identification of differentially regulated proteins [3].

Ethics Statements

All animal studies were conducted in accordance with the Animal Scientific Procedures Act (1986) and with the Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes (2010, no. 63). Experiments and breeding were approved by the University of Dundee Ethical Review Committee and further subjected to approved study plans by the Named Veterinary Surgeon and Compliance Officer.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Odetta Antico: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. Raja S. Nirujogi: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Formal analysis, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. Miratul M.K. Muqit: Conceptualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing, Funding acquisition.

Declaration of Competing Interests

The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests:

M.M.K.M. is a member of the Scientific Advisory Board of Mitokinin Inc. and Scientific Consultant to Stealth Biotherapeutics Inc. and Merck & Co Inc.

Acknowledgments

We thank R. F. Soares for help with LC and MS instrument maintenance (MRC PPU). We are grateful to G. Gilmour and S. Channon for mouse genotyping, the Dundee School of Life Science Animal Unit Staff (coordinated by Don Tennant and Carol Clacher), the sequencing service (School of Life Sciences, University of Dundee). This work was supported by a Wellcome Trust Senior Research Fellowship in Clinical Science (210753/Z/18/Z), the Rosetrees Trust, EMBO YIP Award and EMBO Small Grant, the Michael J. Fox Foundation, Medical Research Council and Aligning Science Across Parkinson's (ASAP) initiative. Michael J. Fox Foundation administers the grant (ASAP-000463) on behalf of ASAP and itself. For the purpose of open access, the author has applied a CC-BY public copyright license to the Author Accepted Manuscript (AAM) version arising from this submission.

Footnotes

Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.dib.2023.109336.

Appendix. Supplementary materials

mmc1.xlsx (3MB, xlsx)

Data Availability

References

  • 1.Antico O., Ordureau A., Stevens M., Singh F., Nirujogi R.S., Gierlinski M., Barini E., Rickwood M.L., Prescott A., Toth R., Ganley I.G., HARPER J.W., Muqit M.M.K. Global ubiquitylation analysis of mitochondria in primary neurons identifies endogenous Parkin targets following activation of PINK1. Sci. Adv. 2021;7:eabj0722. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abj0722. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kong A.T., Leprevost F.V., Avtonomov D.M., Mellacheruvu D., Nesvizhskii A.I. MSFragger: ultrafast and comprehensive peptide identification in mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nat. Methods. 2017;14:513–520. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Tyanova S., Temu T., Sinitcyn P., Carlson A., Hein M.Y., Geiger T., Mann M., Cox J. The Perseus computational platform for comprehensive analysis of (prote)omics data. Nat. Methods. 2016;13:731–740. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Wisniewski J.R., Hein M.Y., Cox J., Mann M. A "proteomic ruler" for protein copy number and concentration estimation without spike-in standards. Mol. Cell Proteom. 2014;13:3497–3506. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M113.037309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Caenepeel S., Charydczak G., Sudarsanam S., Hunter T., Manning G. The mouse kinome: discovery and comparative genomics of all mouse protein kinases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2004;101:11707–11712. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0306880101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Eid S., Turk S., Volkamer A., Rippmann F., Fulle S. KinMap: a web-based tool for interactive navigation through human kinome data. BMC Bioinform. 2017;18:16. doi: 10.1186/s12859-016-1433-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Sacco F., Perfetto L., Castagnoli L., Cesareni G. The human phosphatase interactome: an intricate family portrait. FEBS Lett. 2012;586:2732–2739. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2012.05.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Cesare V.D., Lopez D.C., Mabbitt P.D., Fletcher A.J., Soetens M., Antico O., Wood N.T., Virdee S. Deubiquitinating enzyme amino acid profiling reveals a class of ubiquitin esterases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2021;118 doi: 10.1073/pnas.2006947118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Li Z., Chen S., Jhong J.-H., Pang Y., Huang K.-Y., Li S., Lee T.-Y. UbiNet 2.0: a verified, classified, annotated and updated database of E3 ubiquitin ligase–substrate interactions. Database. 2021:2021. doi: 10.1093/database/baab010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Sun S., Hu Y., Ao M., Shah P., Chen J., Yang W., Jia X., Tian Y., Thomas S., Zhang H. N-GlycositeAtlas: a database resource for mass spectrometry-based human N-linked glycoprotein and glycosylation site mapping. Clinic. Proteom. 2019;16:35. doi: 10.1186/s12014-019-9254-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Brozzi A., Urbanelli L., Luc Germain P., Magini A., Emiliani C. hLGDB: a database of human lysosomal genes and their regulation. Database. 2013:2013. doi: 10.1093/database/bat024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Rath S., Sharma R., Gupta R., Ast T., Chan C., Durham T.J., Goodman R.P., Grabarek Z., Haas M.E., Hung W.H.W., Joshi P.R., Jourdain A.A., Kim S.H., Kotrys A.V., Lam S.S., Mccoy J.G., Meisel J.D., Miranda M., Panda A., Patgiri A., Rogers R., Sadre S., Shah H., Skinner O.S., To T.L., Walker M.A., Wang H., Ward P.S., Wengrod J., Yuan C.C., Calvo S.E., Mootha V.K. MitoCarta3.0: an updated mitochondrial proteome now with sub-organelle localization and pathway annotations. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49:D1541–D1547. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa1011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bellenguez C., Küçükali F., Jansen I.E., Kleineidam L., Moreno-Grau S., Amin N., Naj A.C., Campos-Martin R., Grenier-Boley B., Andrade V., Holmans P.A., Boland A., Damotte V., Van Der Lee S.J., Costa M.R., Kuulasmaa T., Yang Q., De Rojas I., Bis J.C., Yaqub A., Prokic I., Chapuis J., Ahmad S., Giedraitis V., Aarsland D., Garcia-Gonzalez P., Abdelnour C., Alarcón-Martín E., Alcolea D., Alegret M., Alvarez I., Álvarez V., Armstrong N.J., Tsolaki A., Antúnez C., Appollonio I., Arcaro M., Archetti S., Pastor A.A., Arosio B., Athanasiu L., Bailly H., Banaj N., Baquero M., Barral S., Beiser A., Pastor A.B., Below J.E., Benchek P., Benussi L., Berr C., Besse C., Bessi V., Binetti G., Bizarro A., Blesa R., Boada M., Boerwinkle E., Borroni B., Boschi S., Bossù P., Bråthen G., Bressler J., Bresner C., Brodaty H., Brookes K.J., Brusco L.I., Buiza-Rueda D., Bûrger K., Burholt V., Bush W.S., Calero M., Cantwell L.B., Chene G., Chung J., Cuccaro M.L., Carracedo Á., Cecchetti R., Cervera-Carles L., Charbonnier C., Chen H.-H., Chillotti C., Ciccone S., Claassen J.A.H.R., Clark C., Conti E., Corma-Gómez A., Costantini E., Custodero C., Daian D., Dalmasso M.C., Daniele A., Dardiotis E., Dartigues J.-F., De Deyn P.P., De Paiva Lopes K., De Witte L.D., Debette S., Deckert J., Del Ser T., et al. New insights into the genetic etiology of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias. Nat. Genet. 2022 doi: 10.1038/s41588-022-01024-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Nalls M.A., Blauwendraat C., Vallerga C.L., Heilbron K., Bandres-Ciga S., Chang D., Tan M., Kia D.A., Noyce A.J., Xue A., Bras J., Young E., Von Coelln R., Simón-Sánchez J., Schulte C., Sharma M., Krohn L., Pihlstrøm L., Siitonen A., Iwaki H., Leonard H., Faghri F., GIBBS J.R., Hernandez D.G., Scholz S.W., Botia J.A., Martinez M., Corvol J.C., Lesage S., Jankovic J., Shulman L.M., Sutherland M., Tienari P., Majamaa K., Toft M., Andreassen O.A., Bangale T., Brice A., Yang J., Gan-Or Z., Gasser T., Heutink P., Shulman J.M., Wood N.W., Hinds D.A., Hardy J.A., Morris H.R., Gratten J., Visscher P.M., Graham R.R., Singleton A.B. Identification of novel risk loci, causal insights, and heritable risk for Parkinson's disease: a meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies. Lancet Neurol. 2019;18:1091–1102. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30320-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Grove J., Ripke S., Als T.D., Mattheisen M., Walters R.K., Won H., Pallesen J., Agerbo E., Andreassen O.A., Anney R., Awashti S., Belliveau R., Bettella F., buxbaum J.D., Bybjerg-Grauholm J., Bækvad-Hansen M., Cerrato F., Chambert K., christensen J.H., Churchhouse C., Dellenvall K., Demontis D., De Rubeis S., Devlin B., Djurovic S., Dumont A.L., Goldstein J.I., Hansen C.S., Hauberg M.E., Hollegaard M.V., Hope S., Howrigan D.P., Huang H., Hultman C.M., Klei L., Maller J., Martin J., Martin A.R., Moran J.L., Nyegaard M., Nærland T., Palmer D.S., Palotie A., Pedersen C.B., Pedersen M.G., Dpoterba T., Poulsen J.B., Pourcain B.S., Qvist P., Rehnström K., Reichenberg A., Reichert J., Robinson E.B., Roeder K., Roussos P., Saemundsen E., Sandin S., Satterstrom F.K., Davey Smith G., Stefansson H., Steinberg S., Stevens C.R., Sullivan P.F., Turley P., Walters G.B., Xu X., Wray N.R., Trzaskowski M., Byrne E.M., Abdellaoui A., Adams M.J., Air T.M., Andlauer T.F.M., Bacanu S.-A., Beekman A.T.F., Bigdeli T.B., Binder E.B., Blackwood D.H.R., Bryois J., Buttenschøn H.N., Cai N., Castelao E., Clarke T.-K., Coleman J.R.I., Colodro-Conde L., Couvy-Duchesne B., Craddock N., Crawford G.E., Davies G., Deary I.J., Degenhardt F., Derks E.M., Direk N., Dolan C.V., Dunn E.C., Eley T.C., Escott-Price V., Kiadeh F.F.H., Finucane H.K., Forstner A.J., et al. Identification of common genetic risk variants for autism spectrum disorder. Nat. Genet. 2019;51:431–444. doi: 10.1038/s41588-019-0344-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Nirujogi R.S., Tonelli F., Taylor M., Lis P., Zimprich A., Sammler E., Alessi D.R. Development of a multiplexed targeted mass spectrometry assay for LRRK2-phosphorylated Rabs and Ser910/Ser935 biomarker sites. Biochem. J. 2021;478:299–326. doi: 10.1042/BCJ20200930. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Teo G.C., Polasky D.A., Yu F., Nesvizhskii A.I. Fast deisotoping algorithm and its implementation in the MSFragger search engine. J. Proteome Res. 2021;20:498–505. doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.0c00544. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Bruderer R., Bernhardt O.M., Gandhi T., Miladinović S.M., Cheng L.Y., Messner S., Ehrenberger T., Zanotelli V., Butscheid Y., Escher C., Vitek O., Rinner O., Reiter L. Extending the limits of quantitative proteome profiling with data-independent acquisition and application to acetaminophen-treated three-dimensional liver microtissues. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2015;14:1400–1410. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M114.044305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

mmc1.xlsx (3MB, xlsx)

Data Availability Statement


Articles from Data in Brief are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES