Abstract
Purpose
Breast surgery is usually performed under general anesthesia. Tumescent local anesthesia (TLA) offers the possibility to anesthetize large areas with highly diluted local anesthetic.
Methods
In this paper, the implementation, and experiences with TLA in the field of breast surgery are discussed.
Conclusion
For carefully selected indications, breast surgery in TLA represents an alternative to ITN.
Keywords: Tumescent local anesthesia, TLA, Breast surgery
What does this study add to the clinical work
Most common breast surgeries can be performed under tumescent local anesthesia and therefore should be offered as an alternative to general anesthesia. This article provides insight into this anesthetic technique in the field of breast surgery. |
Introduction
Breast surgery is usually performed under general anesthesia. Rarely or in special situations, these procedures are performed under local anesthesia—especially in multimorbid or elderly patients [1–3].
In contrast to common local anesthesia (LA), in which the maximum dose is reached quickly, and only small areas are anesthetized, tumescent local anesthesia (TLA) allows larger areas to be anesthetized by direct infiltration of considerable amounts of a highly diluted local anesthetic.
The Latin word “tumescere” means “to swell”—the typical aspect of the tissue after infiltration.
The first to describe this infiltration anesthesia for various operations—using cocaine as an analgesic—was the surgeon C.L. Schleich in 1892 [4]. However, due to the emergence of ether anesthesia at that time, the idea was not pursued further and was not revived until 1987 by the American plastic surgeon Jeffrey Klein, who successfully used lidocaine instead of cocaine for liposuction [5]. Over time, the dose of local anesthetic was progressively reduced while maintaining the same effect, and automatic infiltration pump systems facilitated the treatment of large areas. Thus, Gerhard Sattler introduced the method of liposuction with a roller pump in Germany in 1994 [6].
Breuninger developed subcutaneous infusion anesthesia (SIA) with flow- and volume-controlled infusion devices in 1998 [7]; he used Ringer's solution as a base without further addition of sodium bicarbonate and introduced the long-term local anesthetic ropivacaine, on the market since 1994, into the local anesthetic mixture [8].
Due to its long-lasting effect, local anesthesia can be separated in time from the surgical procedure and lasts longer postoperatively.
TLA is now used interdisciplinarily and across the surgical spectrum, particularly in dermatologic and plastic surgery or surgery of young children [9].
The use of TLA in the field of senology consists mainly in the addition of tumescent solution in the breast to improve dissection, decrease blood loss, and reduce complications from electrocautery [10–12]–under general anesthesia.
The first description of mastectomy with TLA was by Worland in 1996 [13]. Since then, many studies, reviews, and meta-analyses have shown that preoperative infiltration of a tumescent solution—usually consisting of epinephrine and balanced full electrolyte solution and local anesthetic (usually lidocaine)—reduces perioperative blood loss and postoperative pain in mastectomies with or without reconstruction. In reduction mammoplasty, it can also shorten the operative time [14–17].
There are few publications with small numbers of cases, mostly older patients at high risk of anesthesia (ASA III-IV), describing breast surgery-mostly mastectomies-under local anesthesia alone [2, 3] or TLA [1, 18], always with the addition of sedation (e.g. propofol, midazolam, fentanyl).
Known complications of general anesthesia such as postoperative nausea, vomiting (PONV) or postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) can be avoided, especially in the elderly. Retrospective studies, some with large case numbers, have been published by plastic surgeons on augmentation and reduction mammoplasty for TLA in the outpatient setting [19, 20].
Based on the literature and to our knowledge, no diagnostic or oncoplastic breast surgeries have been routinely performed under TLA. Since various breast surgeries have been performed in TLA at the Department of Women’s Health in Tuebingen since January 2022, this article aims to provide insight into the TLA technique that has been used for breast surgeries.
Preparations before the operation
Before TLA is started, the patient is informed in detail about the upcoming steps. Routinely, the patient is presented to an anesthesiologist if he or she is > 70 years of age, has an ASA or a NYHA score of ≥ III, or is obese (> BMI 30).
A comfortable environment, empathetic staff, and good communication between surgeon and patient during TLA application and surgery are an important basis for the successful performance of all procedures [21].
Patients should take their usual medications and can drink up to 2 h before surgery. Initially, depending on the planned surgery, all necessary image-guided wire placements are made in our facility. Stereotactic marker wires can be placed after TLA application, so no further local anesthesia is required. In case of breast cancer, Technetium (99mTc) radiolabeled colloids are administered ipsilateral periareolar for later sentinel node biopsy.
Using a pen on the patient’s skin, the surgeon marks the area to be removed and the area to be anesthetized as well as the planned incision (see Fig. 1). Afterwards the surgeon selects the TLA concentration, taking into account the size of the surgical area and the time window (Table 1).
Table 1.
Concentration | Sterofundin (ml) | Stock solution | Epinephrine (1:1000) | Max Dose | Beginning of the effect (min) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.21% | 500 ml | 40 ml | 0.5 ml | 3 ml/kgbw | 2–5 min |
0.05% | 500 ml | 10 ml | 0.5 ml | 12 ml/kgbw | 20 min |
TLA is then applied by an intern/resident via infusion pump systems or centrifugal pumps with 25- or 27-G needles in an OR prep room.
Tumescent solutions
There are no general recommendations for the dosage of a TLA—different institutions and situations may use different compositions.
The following points should be considered:
The basis of the tumescent solution is a full electrolyte solution (e.g. Sterofundin ISO), so that the addition of bicarbonate can be dispensed with. As an analgesic, a combination of a short-acting local anesthetic such as lidocaine (lowest risk of inducing methemoglobinemia, max. dose between 35 and 55 mg/kilogram body weight [22]), and ropivacaine as a long-acting local anesthetic is useful [8]. The efficacy lasts for about 15 h postoperatively.
On the one hand, the combination of several local anesthetics with different half-lifes leads to a faster onset and a longer duration of the analgesic effect. On the other hand, toxic effects may be enhanced with higher amounts of free active ingredients due to competitive protein binding [23]. Therefore, when mixing local anesthetics, attention must be paid to the dosage of each component, as it differs from the dosage when used alone [24], taking into account the maximum dose in TLA (Table 1). Regarding pharmacokinetics, several studies have shown that it is possible to safely mix these agents [25]. In these cases, the patient must be informed of the off-label use of the mixture.
Through a cooperation with the University Pharmacy of Tuebingen, the Department of Women’s Health receives a thermally sterilized stock solution prepared in a clean room atmosphere in compliance with hygiene requirements and containing 10 mg ropivacaine (1%) and lidocaine 20 mg (2%) per 1 ml (ph 4; additives: aqua ad inj., hydrochloric acid/sodium hydroxide solution).
On the day of surgery, this stock solution is diluted with whole electrolyte solution according to the desired concentration (see Table 1), which considerably speeds up and simplifies the preparation of TLA [26]. This provides physically stable, easy-to-handle, and ready-to-use TLA solutions at various concentrations that can be used for 24 h. The addition of epinephrine results in vasoconstriction, thus reducing blood loss and prolonging the anesthetic effect. At a dose of 0.5 mg epinephrine, no systemic effect is expected with an overall large infusion volume.
The Department of Women’s Health in Tuebingen works with two different concentrations, depending on the surgical area and volume as well as time window:
0.05% TLA solution for large breasts and time lead (0.5 to approx. 2 h) to surgery.
0.21% TLA solution for small operations, limited anesthetic area, short lead time and for intraoperative additional analgesia.
Devices, needles and infiltration speed
Using infusion devices (e.g. Infusomat compact plus B. Braun), gentle application with an infiltration rate of 50–1500 ml/hour is possible—depending on the localization, the extent of the planned intervention, the tissue density or pressure and the needle size [7], taking into account the maximum dose limits (see Table 1).
Because the infusion is semiautomatic, monitoring can be delegated to supporting stuff who can infiltrate multiple patients simultaneously. Thus, the physician does not have to stand next to the patient during this lengthy process. The slow infiltration speed with fine needles (e.g., 27- or 25-G needles) does not usually cause pain in the patient, but rather a feeling of tension.
Since this form of subcutaneous infusion anesthesia is very time-consuming, it is sometimes useful to use additional centrifugal pumps (e.g., Dispenser DP 30). According to the manufacturer, 17 l/h, i.e. 280 ml/min, can be applied via a foot switch. The flow rate can be changed via a rotary switch (0–100%) by reducing the lumen of the silicone tube above the roller. The volume applied depends on the tissue pressure and the cannula used (27G needle: 450–600 ml/h; 25G needle: 800–1000 ml/h; 22G needle: 1500 ml/h). The maximum running speed without discomfort should be determined together with the patient.
If the infiltrated area becomes pale and tense, the needle can be placed elsewhere (Fig. 1).
Initially, TLA is usually applied superficially with a fine needle (25–27 G). If deeper infiltration is required at a later stage (e.g. in the axilla), a non-ground needle should be used to avoid deep injury, as TLA is usually performed without sonographic control.
Monitoring during TLA
In the run-up to TLA and surgery, the patient is informed in detail about the upcoming steps. Prior to the start of TLA-application, the patient will receive a peripheral intravenous venous catheter (PVC) for additional sedative medication, if necessary.
During TLA-application, the patient must be monitored hemodynamically, e.g., with a pulse oximeter and blood pressure monitors, to immediately detect accidental intravascular infiltration (immediate skin anemia, increase in heart rate) (Table 2).
Table 2.
Side effects | Precautionary and emergency measures |
---|---|
systemic toxicity of local anesthetics (LAST) | Termination of the TLA application |
Oxygenation, treatment of seizures (benzodiazepine), resuscitation (if necessary), administration of 20% lipid emulsion | |
Continuous monitoring of vital parameters | |
Neurological symptoms (seizures, unconsciousness, restlessness) | Termination of the TLA application |
Oxygen supply, airway management, treatment of seizures (benzodiazepines), ECG monitoring if necessary | |
Apnea following cerebral toxicity | Termination of the TLA application |
Oxygen supply, resuscitation, continuous monitoring of vital parameters | |
Cardiovascular symptoms (bradycardia, hypotension, cardiac arrhythmias) | Termination of the TLA application |
Oxygenation, ECG monitoring | |
Treatment according to the ECG findings | |
Methemoglobinemia | Termination of the TLA application |
Oxygenation | |
Application of Methylene Blue | |
treatment of seizures (benzodiazepines) | |
Pneumothorax | Use of non-ground needles in deep areas/ axilla |
Application of TLA in the axilla under sonographic control | |
Continuous monitoring of vital parameters | |
Chest x-ray | |
Chest tube/ needle decompression if necessary |
With the above weight-adjusted dosages, one is within the recommended maximum dose, so that even coronary heart disease is not a contraindication for this procedure. With regard to toxic side effects, the absolute dose is less important than the speed of administration.
Premedication? (Analgo-)Sedation?
Each patient is offered the option of pre- and intraoperative conscious sedation with midazolam (1–5 mg) and is informed of possible side effects.
During surgery, the patient's vital signs are monitored (blood pressure, ECG and oxygen saturation) and documented. In the case of moderate or necessary deep analgosedation, equipment corresponding to an anesthesia workstation must be available that is sufficiently suitable for monitoring and supporting respiratory and cardiovascular monitoring.
All members of the surgical team are regularly trained in emergency situations such as resuscitation and treatment of TLA-associated adverse events (see Table 2). In addition, anesthesiologists are always available for emergencies.
In the case of intraoperative conscious sedation, the patient must still be monitored postoperatively for 2–4 h before being allowed to leave the ward. If sedation is not used, the patient can be discharged 15 min after the procedure.
Special intraoperative features
Intraoperatively, additional analgesia (e.g. midazolam i.v., piritramide i.v.) can be administered at any time. Injection of a larger volume of 0.21% TLA solution in case of pain is also an option. For mastectomies or partial thoracic muscle resections, additional pectoralis nerve blockades under sonographic view with 10–50 ml of 0.21% TLA may be useful at the beginning of surgery.
Compared to general anesthesia, the surgical field tends to be moister and less bloody due to the tumescent solution. The tissue layers are often easier and gentler to cut with scissors due to hydrodissection. For electrocautery, it is recommended to reduce the standard intensity and perform dissection with scissors or bipolar forceps if there is discomfort in the axilla or prepectoral area.
Patient selection
The prerequisite for surgery in TLA is a cooperative, willing and understanding patient. Since only the surgical field is anesthetized, the patient can move without restrictions and can be repositioned if necessary.
Mentally unstable patients and those with excessive fear of needles and injections, as well as dementia patients, are not suitable for TLA.
In general, the contraindications are the same as for common local anesthesia.
First experiences and studies
Initially, fibroadenomas or benign lesions were removed in young patients on an outpatient basis in the TLA. Simple segmental resections and mastectomies were also performed in the TLA in older patients in whom the tumor had progressed under anti-hormonal therapy and who had previously refused surgery in general anesthesia.
Based on positive experience and increasing demand we initiated a prospective study including breast cancer patients with the need of surgical removement in TLA versus general anesthesia (Ethics Committee 598/2022BO1). Primary endpoint will be the level of perioperative pain. Secondary endpoints include the health-related quality of life, complications, and perioperative anxiety. Not included will be tumor-adapted reduction mammoplasty, nipple- and skin-sparing mastectomies with implant placement and complete axillary dissections.
Summary
To date no diagnostic or oncoplastic breast surgery has been routinely performed under tumescent local anesthesia without general anesthesia. This article presents the possible application and the procedure of tumescent local anesthesia for these procedures.
The independence from the anesthesiologist, the low spectrum of side effects compared with general anesthesia as well as good perioperative mobility of the patient are convincing reasons for the use of TLA in breast surgery (Table 3).
Table 3.
Advantages | Hydrodissection effect |
The addition of epinephrine results in less intraoperative bleeding | |
The slow infiltration, pressure buildup, and marked lipophilicity of LA, together with vasoconstrictors, result in a prolonged effect of TLA | |
The long-lasting anesthetic effect leads to a reduction in postoperative pain | |
Ease of administration—compared to epidural, intercostal block and paravertebral block, TLA is very resource efficient and does not require individuals with special skills | |
Local anesthetics also have antimicrobial activity [28] | |
Disadvantages | Moist surgical site |
Time-consuming infiltration | |
Guidance of the awake patient | |
Possible intraoperative pain with necessary additional analgesia | |
(Low) risk of intravascular application of TLA solution |
Tumescent solutions can be easily prepared and gently applied with infusion or roller pumps.
Selecting the correct TLA concentration, cannula, cannula position, flow rate, and volume required requires experience and a learning curve.
Author contributions
Author BB, JP, GH, HF, H-MH and MH have given substantial contributions to the conception and design of the manuscript. All authors have participated in the drafting of the manuscript, and also read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Carlson GW. Total mastectomy under local anesthesia: the tumescent technique. Breast J. 2005;11(2):100–102. doi: 10.1111/j.1075-122X.2005.21536.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Joseph AY, Bloch R, Yee S. Simple anesthesia for simple mastectomies. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2003;77(2):189–191. doi: 10.1023/a:1021386722363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Oakley N, Dennison AR, Shorthouse AJ. A prospective audit of simple mastectomy under local anaesthesia. Eur J Surg Oncol. 1996;22(2):134–136. doi: 10.1016/s0748-7983(96)90541-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Cl S. Die Infiltrationsanästhesie (lokale Anästhesie) und ihr Verhältnis zur allgemeinen Narkose (Inhalationsanästhesie) Berlin: Verh dtsch Ges Chir; 1892. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Klein J. The tumescent technique for liposuction surgery. Am J Cosmet Surg. 1987;4:263–267. doi: 10.1177/074880688700400403. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Sattler G. Lokalanästhesie, regionalanästhesie, tumeszenzanästhesie: techniken und indikationen. Z Hautkr. 1998;5:316. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Breuninger H, Wehner-Caroli J. Slow infusion tumescent anesthesia. Dermatol Surg. 1998;24(7):759–763. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.1998.tb04246.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Breuninger H, Hobbach PS, Schimek F. Ropivacaine: an important anesthetic agent for slow infusion and other forms of tumescent anesthesia. Dermatol Surg. 1999;25(10):799–802. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-4725.1999.99087.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Moehrle M, Breuninger H. Dermatosurgery using subcutaneous infusion anesthesia with prilocaine and ropivacaine in children. Pediatr Dermatol. 2001;18(6):469–472. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1470.2001.1862008.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.O'Donoghue JM, Chaubal ND, Haywood RM, Rickard R, Desai SN. An infiltration technique for reduction mammaplasty: results in 192 consecutive breasts. Acta Chir Plast. 1999;41(4):103–106. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Shoher A, Hekier R, Lucci A., Jr Mastectomy performed with scissors following tumescent solution injection. J Surg Oncol. 2003;83(3):191–193. doi: 10.1002/jso.10265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Staradub VL, Morrow M. Modified radical mastectomy with knife technique. Arch Surg. 2002;137(1):105–110. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.137.1.105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Worland RG. Expanded utilization of the tumescent technique for mastectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1996;98(7):1321. doi: 10.1097/00006534-199612000-00048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Gutowski KA. Tumescent analgesia in plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;134(4):50S–S57. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000678. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hardwicke JT, Jordan RW, Skillman JM. Infiltration of epinephrine in reduction mammaplasty: a systematic review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;130(4):773–778. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318262f085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Metaxotos NG, Asplund O, Hayes M. The efficacy of bupivacaine with adrenaline in reducing pain and bleeding associated with breast reduction: a prospective trial. Br J Plast Surg. 1999;52(4):290–293. doi: 10.1054/bjps.1998.0129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Gipponi M, Baldelli I, Atzori G, Fregatti P, Murelli F, Pesce M, et al. Tumescent anesthesia in skin- and nipple-sparing mastectomy: results of a prospective clinical study. Anticancer Res. 2017;37(1):349–352. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.11328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Khater A, Mazy A, Gad M, Taha Abd Eldayem O, Hegazy M. Tumescent mastectomy: the current indications and operative tips and tricks. Breast Cancer. 2017;9:237–43. doi: 10.2147/BCTT.S131398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Bolletta A, Dessy LA, Fiorot L, Tronci A, Rusciani A, Ciudad P, et al. Sub-muscular breast augmentation using tumescent local anesthesia. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2019;43(1):7–13. doi: 10.1007/s00266-018-1181-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ceccarino R, Di Micco R, Cappelletti R. Aesthetic breast surgery under cold tumescent anesthesia: feasibility and safety in outpatient clinic. Ann Plast Surg. 2019;83(4):384–387. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000001798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Campo R, Santangelo F, Gordts S, Di Cesare C, Van Kerrebroeck H, De Angelis MC, et al. Outpatient hysteroscopy. Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2018;10(3):115–122. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Ostad A, Kageyama N, Moy RL. Tumescent anesthesia with a lidocaine dose of 55 mg/kg is safe for liposuction. Dermatol Surg. 1996;22(11):921–927. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.1996.tb00634.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Schnorr C, Menges T, Hempelmann G. Lokalanästhetika-mischungen bei verschiedenen verfahren der regionalanästhesie. Anästhesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 1990;25:193–197. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1001047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Tryba M. Sind Mischungen von Lokalanästhetika toxischer als Monosubstanzen? Anästhesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 1991;26:286–287. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1000585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Kouba DJ, LoPiccolo MC, Alam M, Bordeaux JS, Cohen B, Hanke CW, et al. Guidelines for the use of local anesthesia in office-based dermatologic surgery. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016;74(6):1201–1219. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2016.01.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Volc S, Maier JCP, Breuninger H, Hund V, Hafner HM, Kofler L. Manufacture and use of tumescence solution meeting hospital-required hygiene conditions - practical implications. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2019;33(11):e434–e435. doi: 10.1111/jdv.15754. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Roerden A, Neunhoeffer F, Goetz A, Haefner H, Kofler L. Vorteile, Sicherheit und Nebenwirkungen der Tumeszenz-Lokalanästhesie bei dermatologischen Operationen an Säuglingen. J der Deutschen Dermatol Gesell. 2021;19(3):352–8. doi: 10.1111/ddg.14340_g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Johnson SM, Saint John BE, Dine AP. Local anesthetics as antimicrobial agents: a review. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 2008;9(2):205–213. doi: 10.1089/sur.2007.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]