Abstract
Human galectin 3 (Gal-3) has been implicated to play important roles in different biological recognition processes such as tumor growth and cancer metastasis. High-affinity Gal-3 ligands are desirable for functional studies and as inhibitors for potential therapeutic development. We report here a facile synthesis of β-cyclodextrin (CD)-based Tn and TF antigen-containing multivalent ligands via a click reaction. Binding studies indicated that the synthetic multivalent glycan ligands demonstrated a clear clustering effect in binding to human Gal-3, with up to 153-fold enhanced relative affinity in comparison with the monomeric glycan ligand. The GalNAc (Tn antigen) containing heptavalent ligand showed the highest affinity for human Gal-3 among the synthetic ligands tested, with an EC50 of 1.4 μM in binding to human Gal-3. A cell-based assay revealed that the synthetic CD-based multivalent ligands could efficiently inhibit Gal-3 binding to human airway epithelial cells, with an inhibitory capacity consistent with their binding affinity measured by SPR. The synthetic cyclodextrin-based ligands described in this study should be valuable for functional studies of human Gal-3 and potentially for therapeutic applications.
Keywords: Multivalent ligand, Glycocluster, Galectin-3, Cyclodextrin scaffold, Tn antigen, TF antigen
1. Introduction
Lectin-carbohydrate interactions are key mediators of numerous natural biological processes such as early development, tissue repair, and immune recognition, as well as pathological conditions, including cancer growth and metastasis, and host attachment and entry of potential pathogens1-4. Lectins are usually composed of polypeptide subunits each carrying a carbohydrate recognition domain (CRD), resulting in oligomeric multivalent carbohydrate-binding proteins 4-5. The specificity and affinity of a lectin’s CRD is determined by a unique set of amino acids that interact with the carbohydrate ligand usually via hydrogen bonds and stacking interactions. The multivalent binding of the lectin subunits’ CRDs to multivalent ligands increases the avidity of the lectin-ligand interaction 6-8. Based on the unique sequence motifs in the CRD, cation requirements, and structural folds, lectins are currently classified into distinct types, including C-type, I-type, F-type, galectins and others. Among these, galectins are β-galactoside-binding lectins, which have generated great interest due to their multiple functions in health and disease 1-3, 9-10. Based on their domain organization, they are classified as “proto”, “chimera”, and “tandem-repeat” types, each type comprising one or multiple galectin members.
Galectin-3 (Gal-3), the only member of the “chimera”-type, is involved in diverse biological processes, some of which are beneficial to the host, such as modulation of signaling pathways, cell adhesion, and pathogen recognition, whereas others are clearly detrimental 11. Among the latter, Gal-3 promotes cancer metastasis by facilitating adhesion of circulating tumor cells to the vascular endothelium 12-16. Similarly, in influenza A patients, Gal3 can increase adhesion of Streptococcus pneumoniae to the airway epithelial cells, potentially promoting a secondary bacterial infection and pneumonia 17. Therefore, there is great interest in preventing or disrupting the above-mentioned Gal3-ligand interactions by the use of natural and synthetic glycan-displaying multivalent inhibitors.
The Thomsen–Friedenreich disaccharide (TFD), Gal-β-1,3-GalNAc, which has been found in about 90 % of all human cancers, is a natural ligand for Gal-318. Previous reports have shown that both natural and synthetic TFD can inhibit Gal3-mediated cell adhesion of TFD-decorated tumor cells 12,19 Similarly, Tn antigen (GalNAc linked to serine or threonine)-based ligands can also function as potent inhibitors for Gal-3 20-22. Since in their natural state Gal-3 subunits oligomerize as trimers and pentamers, considerable effort has been devoted to investigating multivalent interactions between oligomeric Gal-3 and multivalent glycan clusters, that would yield high affinity/avidity inhibitors of the aforementioned detrimental Gal-3 binding 20,23-34. Our first attempt to develop high affinity/avidity synthetic multivalent inhibitors was based on using human serum albumin as a scaffold 35. To enable higher multivalency that would increase avidity of the Gal3-ligand interaction, we sought to construct Tn or TFD-containing glycoclusters, using β-cyclodextrin (CD) as the cyclic oligosaccharide scaffold that comprises seven glucose units linked by α-1,4-glycosidic bonds. β-Cyclodextrin has also been widely used as the scaffold for multivalent display and as a vehicle for selective drug delivery, due to its biocompatibility and non-immunogenicity 14,36-40. β-CD has previously been used as a scaffold for constructing multivalent carbohydrate ligands for lectins 29,4150. In 2004, Gabius and coworkers reported the first cyclodextrin-based glycan ligands for Gal-3, where they have shown that the CD-based heptavalent N-acetyllactosamine (LacNAc) ligand has an EC50 of 106 μM, which is about 28-fold more potent than free LacNAc 29. Other synthetic Gal-3 multivalent inhibitors on different scaffolds have also been reported, with EC50 values ranging from μM to mM. 20-21,25,27-30,32,35,42,43 We report in this paper a facile synthesis of β-CD-based multivalent ligands carrying GalNAc (Tn antigen) and Gal-β-1,3-GalNAc (T antigen) moieties via a copper catalyzed azide-alkyne cycloaddition reaction. Surface plasmon resonance binding analysis indicated that the CD-based GalNAc and Gal-β-1,3-GalNAc ligands showed up to 153-fold enhanced affinity to human Gal-3 in comparison with free disaccharide ligand. In addition, a cell-based assay revealed their significantly increased inhibitory capacity for Gal-3 binding to human airway epithelial cells, as compared with a CD-based lactose inhibitor.
2. Results and discussion
2.1. Synthesis of the azide-functionalized mono- and di-saccharide ligands
We sought to apply the copper-catalyzed azide-alkyne cycloaddition reaction to conjugate mono- and disaccharide ligands to a β-cyclodextrin scaffold to make the heptavalent glycoclusters as ligands for galectin-3. For that purpose, we decided to introduce an azide group in the monomeric ligands of galectin-3 with polyethylene glycol (PEG) linker attached to the reducing end, including the GalNAc, Gal-β-1,3-GalNAc, and lactose derivatives (1–3), respectively (Fig. 1).
Figure 1.
Structures of azide-functionalized GalNAc (Tn antigen), Gal-β-1,3-GalNAc (T antigen) and lactose to be conjugated to β-cyclodextrin scaffold.
The synthesis of 1 and 2 commenced with the use of the 1-bromo-2-azido-galactose derivative (5) as the starting material, which was prepared from galactose following the previously reported procedure 44. Glycosylation of 5 with the alcohol under the promotion of AgClO4/AgCO3 gave the α-glycoside (6) in a moderate yield (Scheme 1). The α-galactosidic linkage was confirmed by 1H NMR, which showed a relatively small coupling constant (J1,2 = 3.2 Hz) between the H-1 and H-2, indicating an α-glycosidic bond. The azide group at C-2 was then reduced to give the GalNAc derivative (7). Introduction of a terminal azide was achieved by reaction of 7 with NaN3 to give 8. De-O-acetylation of 8 with catalytic amount of NaOMe in MeOH afforded 1 in excellent yield. To synthesize the azide-tagged T antigen disaccharide (2), 1 was first reacted with benzaldehyde dimethyl acetal to give the 4,6-O-benzylidene protected GalNAc derivative (9). Then 9 was glycosylated with acetobromogalactose under the promotion of AgOTf to give the disaccharide derivative (10). The β-glycosidic configuration was confirmed by 1H NMR which showed a relatively large coupling constant (J1,2 = 7.6 Hz) between the H-1′ and H-2′, suggesting the presence of a β-glycosidic bond. Finally, global deprotection afforded the azide-tagged T antigen disaccharide (2) (Scheme 1). The synthesis of the azide-functionalized lactose derivative (3) was performed following the previously procedure 45. On the other hand, the azide-lactose derivative (3) was synthesized following the previously reported procedure 28.
Scheme 1.
Chemical synthesis of the disaccharide ligands for making GalNAc azide and T antigen azide.
2.2. Synthesis of the cyclodextrin-based multivalent glycan ligands.
To synthesize the cyclodextrin-based multivalent glycan ligands, the 7 primary hydroxyl groups in β-cyclodextrin was selectively converted to amino groups to give 13, following the previously reported procedure 46 (Scheme 2). Thus, iodination of β-cyclodextrin followed by nucleophilic substitution with NaN3 gave the azide derivative (12) in 70 % yield in two steps. Then reduction of the azide groups with triphenyl phosphine gave the amine derivative (13). Finally, coupling between the amine groups in 13 and the N-hydroxylsuccinimide ester of 4-pentynoic acid (14) afforded the alkyne-functionalized cyclodextrin (15) after size exclusion chromatography.
Scheme 2.
Synthesis of cyclodextrin-based multivalent inhibitors for galectins.
With the alkyne-functionalized cyclodextrin (15) in hands, we sought to synthesize the multivalent glycan ligands using the Cu(I)-catalyzed alkyne-azide cycloaddition reaction between the alkyne (15) and the azide derivatives (1–3). Thus, the Cu(I)-catalyzed click reaction between 15 and azide-tagged GalNAc derivative (1) (2 equiv. of azide per alkyne group) was performed in an aqueous solution at room temperature and the reaction was monitored by mass spec. After 24 h, an essential quantitative conversion was achieved. The desired conjugate (16) was purified by size-exclusion chromatography on a Sephadex G-25 column in a 79 % isolated yield. In a similar fashion, the conjugations of the azide-tagged T antigen (2) and the lactose derivative (3) with 15 provided the desired conjugates (17 and 18) in 70 % and 74 % isolated yields, respectively (Scheme 2). The structures of all final glycoconjugates were confirmed by 1H and 13C NMR and ESI-HRMS analysis.
2.3. SPR analysis of the binding of the synthetic CD-based glycan ligands with human Gal-3.
The affinity of the synthetic multivalent ligands for human Gal-3 was measured by surface plasmon resonance (SPR) technology. Gal-3 was immobilized on a CM5 chip through an amine coupling method, in which the free amino groups of Gal-3 were reacted with the NHS ester activated carboxymethyl groups of the CM5 surface. The data were collected with Biacore™ T200 system and plotted with GraphPad Prism software to obtain EC50 values (Fig. 2). It was found that all the monovalent mono- and disaccharide derivatives (1–3) showed very weak binding affinities for Gal-3, and there was no apparent binding at a concentration of 500 μM of the monomeric ligands (1–3). To obtain an estimate EC50 value, we selected lactose as a reference and measured its binding with Gal-3 starting with a high concentration (5 mM) of the ligand, which gave an EC50 of 1.47 mM (Fig. S1). The data was consistent with previous published results 24,47-48. in contrast, all the multivalent glycan ligands (16–18) showed significantly enhanced affinities for Gal-3 with EC50 values in the micromolar range. An analysis of the binding data gave an EC50 of 1.37 μM, 3.16 μM, and 25.3 μM for the GalNAc (Tn antigen), Gal-β-1,3-GalNAc (T antigen), and lactose-containing heptavalent glycan ligands (16–18), respectively (Table 1). In comparison with the affinity of free lactose, the relative affinity (per glycan ligand) of the heptavalent Tn-, TFD- and lactose-containing multivalent ligands (16–18) showed 153-fold, 66-fold, and 8-fold enhanced affinity, respectively. These results indicate a clear multivalent clustering effect of the CD-based ligands for interactions with Gal-3. It is worthy to note that the GalNAc (Tn-antigen)-containing multivalent ligand (16) showed higher affinity for Gal-3 than the disaccharide (T antigen and lactose)-containing multivalent ligands (17 and 18). The results suggest that the GalNAc moiety is an excellent subunit for designing multivalent ligands for Gal-3, as demonstrated for some previously reported Gal-3 ligands20-22. The structurally well-defined, Gal-NAc-containing heptavalent ligand (16), with an EC50 of 1.4 μM, is among the best synthetic oligomeric ligands for human Gal-3 with natural glycans as ligands 20-22.
Figure 2.
SPR analysis of the binding of the synthetic inhibitors with immobilized galectin-3. (A) monovalent inhibitor Lac-linker (3) starting concentration at 1 mM with serial dilutions; (B) multivalent inhibitor CD-Lac (18) starting concentration at 100 μM with 1:2 serial dilutions; (C) monovalent inhibitor TFD-linker (2) starting concentration at 1 mM with serial dilutions; (D) multivalent inhibitor CD-TFD (17) starting concentration at 25 μM with 1:2 serial dilutions; (E) monovalent inhibitor GalNAc-linker (1) starting concentration at 1 mM with serial dilutions; (F) multivalent inhibitor CD-GalNAc (16) starting concentration at 10 μM with 1:2 serial dilutions.
Table 1.
Affinity of the glycan ligands for human galectin 3a..
| Ligand | EC50 (μM) | Relative affinityb | Relative affinity per unitc |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lac | 1470 | 1 | – |
| mono Tn (1) | > 1,000 | < 1.47 | – |
| mono TFD (2) | > 1000 | < 1.47 | – |
| mono Lac (3) | > 1,000 | < 1.47 | – |
| CD-Tn (16) | 1.37 ± 0.39 | 1070 | 153 |
| CD-TFD (17) | 3.16 ± 0.25 | 464 | 66.4 |
| CD-Lac (18) | 25.3 ± 3.8 | 58.1 | 8.29 |
SPR binding experiments were carried out following our previous studies, and a general method was descripted in the Experimental section.
Relative potency (rel pot.) was calculated relative to the free lactose.
Relative affinity per unit (affinity per unit) was calculated for each sugar unit on cyclodextrin.
2.4. Inhibition of Gal-3 binding to human airway epithelial cells by the synthetic CD-based glycan ligands
A cell-based galectin-3 binding assay was also conducted to measure the inhibition of Gal-3 binding to human airway epithelial cells by the cyclodextrin based glyco-clusters. Thus, A549 cells were mixed with human Gal-3 in the presence of the CD-based glyco-clusters (16–18) at varied concentrations, and the amount of Gal-3 that bind to the cell surface was measured (Fig. 3). In this cell assay, the EC50 values for CD-Tn (16), CD-TFD (17), and CD-Lac (18) were measured as 1.5 μM, 10.5 μM, and 23.5 μM, respectively. The CD-Tn was found to be the most efficient for inhibiting Gal-3 binding to the human airway epithelial cells. It should be noted that in a previous report, the similar synthetic CD-based heptavalent disaccharide ligands carrying LacNAc and Lac moieties gave the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 106 μM and 452 μM, respectively, in a cell-based Gal-3 binding assay 29. In our present study, the synthetic CD-Lac showed much better inhibitory activity, which could be attributed partially to the fact that a longer linker (the PEG linker) was used to present the same lactose ligands, which may make the lactose units more accessible to the binding sites on Gal-3.
Figure 3.
The inhibition of Gal-3 binding to A549 cells by the synthetic multivalent glycan ligands.
3. Conclusion
A facile synthesis of β-cyclodextrin-based Tn and T antigen containing multivalent ligands is described. The synthetic multivalent glycan ligands show a clear clustering effect in binding to human Gal-3, with up to 150-fold enhanced relative affinity in comparison with the monomeric glycan ligand. The GalNAc (Tn antigen) containing heptavalent ligand is shown to have the highest affinity for Gal-3 among the synthetic ligands tested, with an EC50 of 1.4 μM in binding to human Gal-3. This study suggests that the GalNAc moiety is an excellent subunit for designing multivalent ligands for human galectin-3 with high potency. The synthetic cyclodextrin-based ligands described in this study should be valuable for functional studies of human Gal-3.
4. Experimental
4.1. Materials and methods
All chemicals, reagents, and solvents were purchased from Sigma – Aldrich and TCI, and applied in the reaction without further purification, unless specially noted. All moisture sensitive reactions were carried out under argon atmosphere, using standard Schlenk techniques. All dry solvents were prepared according to standard procedures. 4 Å molecular sieves was flame dried before use. Thin-layer chromatography was performed on silica gel 60-F254 on glass plates (Merck, Germany) and revealed with p-anisaldehyde stain. Silica gel (200–425 mesh) used in flash chromatography for large-scale reactions was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Columns for flash chromatography for small-scale reactions were performed on Isolera One system with ZIP KP-Sil columns (Biotage, Sweden) with elution condition specified for each target compound. Solvent gradients were given refer to stepped gradients and concentrations are reported as % v/v. LC-ESI-MS analysis was performed on HPLC-SQ2 detector (Waters, US) with a XBridge BEH Shield RP18 column (2.1 × 50 mm, 3.5 μm) (Waters, US) using water containing 0.1 % formic acid as phase A, MeCN containing 0.1 % formic acid as phase B. LC-ESI-HRMS was performed on an Exactive Plus Orbitrap Mass Spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, US) equipped with a XBridge BEH Shield RP18 column (2.1 × 50 mm, 3.5 μm) (Waters, US) at a flow rate of 0.4 ml/min using water containing 0.1 % formic acid as phase A, MeCN containing 0.1 % formic acid as phase B, at a gradient of 5–95 % B in 6 min. 1H, 13C, and 1H─1H COSY NMR spectra were recorded on either 400 or 600 MHz spectrometer (Bruker, Japan) with CDCl3, D2O or DMSO-d6 as the solvent. All 13C NMR spectra were performed with proton decoupling, and all chemical shifts are reported in part per million (ppm) and referenced to residual solvent. All spectra are in the supporting information. Binding affinities between Gal-3 and analytes were performed on a Biacore T200 (GE Healthcare, US) instrument. Recombinant Gal-3 was expressed following the reported procedure 49.
4.2. Synthesis of the monovalent Gal-3 ligands
2-(2-(2-Chloroethoxy)ethoxy)ethyl-2-azido-3,4,6-tri-O-acetyl-2-desoxy-α-d-galactopyranoside (6).
A mixture of 2-(2-(2-chloroethoxy) ethoxy)ethanol (5.0 g, 30 mmol) and molecular sieves (20 g) in dichloromethane (60 ml) and toluene (50 ml) was stirred at room temperature for 30 min. Then the solution of AgClO4 (0.8 g, 4 mmol) and Ag2CO3 (8.3 g, 30 mmol) in dichloromethane (50 ml) and toluene (50 ml) was added and stirred at 0 °C for 30 min. The solution of glycosyl donor 5 (8.1 g, 20.6 mmol) in dichloromethane (50 ml) and toluene (50 ml) was added dropwise and stirred at 0 °C for 30 min, then the solution was warmed up to room temperature and stirred at for 16 h under argon. The reaction mixture was diluted with dichloromethane (150 ml) then filtered through a Celite pad. The filtrate was washed with sat. NaHCO3 and brine, then dried over Na2SO4, and filtered. The filtrate was concentrated in vacuo and purified by flash silica gel chromatography (hexane/EtOAc = 100/0 to 60/40) to give the pure alpha derivative (6) (2.35 g, 4.87 mmol, 32 %) as a colorless oil. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 5.45 (dd, J4,5 = 1.0 Hz, J3,4 = 3.4 Hz, 1H, H-4), 5.37 (dd, J3,4 = 3.3 Hz, J2,3 = 11.1 Hz, 1H, H-3), 5.09 (d, J1-2 = 3.5 Hz, 1H, H-1), 4.31 (dt, J4,5 = 3.3 Hz, J5,6 = 11.1 Hz, 1H, H-5), 4.05–4.20 (m, 2H, H-2, H-6a), 3.83–3.93 (m, 1H, H-6b), 3.60–3.80 (m, 12H, ethylene glycol chain), 2.17 (s, 3H, Ac), 2.08 (s, 3H, Ac), 2.07 (s, 3H, Ac). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 170.78, 170.47, 170.24, 98.63, 71.77, 71.08, 70.55, 68.56, 68.14, 68.02, 66.98, 61.98, 57.82, 43.19, 21.10, 21.07, 21.03. ESI-MS: [M + Na]+ calcd for C18H28ClN3O10Na+, 504.16; found (m/z), 504.33.
2-(2-(2-Chloroethoxy)ethoxy)ethyl-2-actamido-3,4,6-tri-O-acetyl-2-desoxy-α-d-galactopyranoside (7).
6 (2.35 g, 4.87 mmol) was dissolved in a mixture of THF (100 ml), acetic anhydride (66 ml) and acetic acid (33 ml). Zinc (2.0 g) treated with CuSO4 solution (2 % 80 ml) was added to the mixture, the solution was stirred at room temperature for 16 h, then filtered through Celite pad. The filtrate was diluted with dichloromethane (300 ml) and washed with saturated NaHCO3 till no bubble was forming. The organic layer was separated and washed with brine and dried over MgSO4 and filtered. The filtrated was concentrated in vacuo and then subjected to flash chromatography (EtOAc/MeOH = 100/0 to 90/10) to give acetamide (7) (1.88 g, 3.78 mmol, 78 %) as a colorless oil. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 5.97 (d, JNH,H-2 = 9.6 Hz, 1H, NH-GalNAc), 5.28 (d, J4,5 = 2.5 Hz, 1H, H-4), 5.06 (dd, J3-4 = 3.2 Hz, J2,3 = 11.3 Hz, 1H, H-3), 4.83 (d, J1-2 = 3.6 Hz, 1H, H-1), 4.45–4.52 (m, 1H, H-2), 4.15 (t, J5-6 = 6.6 Hz, 1H, H-5), 3.94–4.06 (m, 2H, H-6a, H-6b), 3.73–3.78 (m, 1H, α-OCHa), 3.65–3.71 (m, 2H, −CH2Cl); 3.54–3.62 (m, 9H, α-OCHb, ethylene glycol chain), 2.07 (s, 3H, Ac), 1.96 (s, 3H, Ac), 1.90 (s, 3H, Ac), 1.89 (s, 3H, Ac). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 171.09, 170.69, 170.66, 98.32, 71.66, 70.90, 70.69, 70.23, 68.78, 67.85, 67.71, 67.05, 62.21, 48.06, 43.20, 23.48, 21.02. ESI-MS: [M + H]+calcd for , 498.17; found (m/z), 498.29.
2-(2-(2-Azido)ethoxy)ethyl-2-actamido-3,4,6-tri-O-acetyl-2-desoxy-α-d-galactopyranoside (8).
A mixture of 7 (0.75 g, 1.5 mmol), NaN3 (0.49 g, 7.5 mmol) and tetrabutylammonium iodide (1.11 g, 3 mmol) in THF (50 ml) was warmed up to 90 °C and stirred for 6 h under argon, the resulting mixture was diluted with EtOAc (100 ml) and washed twice with distilled water (50 ml). The mixture was concentrated in vacuo and subjected to flash chromatography (EtOAc/MeOH = 100/0 to 90/10) to give compound 8 (0.665 g, 1.32 mmol, 88 %) as a white solid. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 5.95 (d, JNH,H-2 = 9.7 Hz, 1H, NH-GalNAc), 5.33 (d, J4,5 = 2.5 Hz, 1H, H-4), 5.12 (dd, J3,4 = 3.3 Hz, J2,3 = 11.3 Hz, 1H, H-3), 4.87 (d, J1,2 = 3.6 Hz, 1H, H-1), 4.51–4.57 (m, 1H, H-2), 4.20 (t, J5,6 = 6.5 Hz, 1H, H-5), 4.00–4.11 (m, 2H, H-6a, H-6b), 3.77–3.84 (m, 1H, α-OCHa), 3.57–3.68 (m, 9H, α-OCHb, ethylene glycol chain), 3.34 (t, J = 4.8 Hz, 2H, −CH2N3), 2.12 (s, 3H, Ac), 2.01 (s, 3H, Ac), 1.95 (s, 3H, Ac), 1.94 (s, 3H, Ac). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 171.19, 170.76, 170.73, 170.69, 98.35, 71.03, 70.87, 70.46, 70.37, 68.83, 67.87, 67.75, 67.11, 62.27, 51.02, 48.12, 23.51, 21.11, 21.06. ESI-MS: [M + H]+ calcd for , 505.21; found (m/z), 505.44.
2-(2-(2-Azido)ethoxy)ethyl-2-actamido-2-desoxy-α-d-gal-actopyranoside (1).
To a solution of 5 (0.668 g, 1.33 mmol) in dry MeOH (10 ml) NaOMe (0.2 mM, 400 μL, 0.5 mmol) was added at room temperature. The reaction mixture was stirred under argon at room temperature for 30 min, then neutralized with Dowex (50 W X8 hydrogen form) and filtered. The filtrate was concentrated in vacuo to dryness to yield the GalNAc derivative (1) (0.458 g, 91 %) as white solid. 1H NMR (D2O, 400 MHz): δ 4.90 (d, J1,2 = 3.8 Hz, 1H, H-1), 4.15 (dd, J1,2 = 3.7 Hz, J2,3 = 11.0, 1H, H-2), 3.94–3.99 (m, 2H, H-4, H-5), 3.89–3.94 (dd, J3,4 = 3.2 Hz, J2,3 = 11.0 Hz, 1H, H-3), 3.81–3.88 (m, 1H, H-6a), 3.69–3.77 (m, 10H, ethylene glycol chain), 3.48 (t, J = 4.7 Hz, 2H, −CH2N3), 2.03 (s, 3H, Ac). 13C NMR (D2O, 150 MHz): δ 174.92, 97.65, 71.38, 70.11, 69.95, 69.90, 69.64, 68.90, 68.20, 66.95, 61.63, 50.50, 50.18, 22.34. ESI-MS: [M + H]+ calcd for , 379.18; found (m/z), 379.38.
2-(2-(2-Azido)ethoxy)ethyl-2-actamido-4,6-O-benzyliden-2-desoxy-α-d-galactopyranoside (9).
A mixture of 1 (255 mg, 0.647 mmol), α,α-Dimethoxytoluene (153 mg, 1.01 mmol) and camphorsulfonic acid (15.1 mg, 0.065 mmol) in dry acetonitrile (10 ml) was stirred at room temperature under argon for 1.5 h. The mixture was concentrated in vacuo and subjected to flash chromatography (EtOAc/iPrOH = 100/0 to 85/15) to give compound 9 (264 mg, 0.566 mmol, 88 %) as white solid. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 7.51–7.57 (m, 2H, Har-Bzn), 7.35–7.43 (m, 3H, Har-Bzn), 6.34 (d, JNH,H2 = 7.3 Hz, 1H, NH-GalNAc), 5.59 (s, 1H, −CH-Bzn), 5.00 (d, J1,2 = 3.0 Hz, 1H, H-1), 4.46–4.53 (m, 1H, H-2), 3.83–4.31 (m, 5H, H-3, H-4, H-5, H-6a, H-6b), 3.80 (s, 1H, H-4), 3.66–3.74 (m, 10H, ethylene glycol chain), 3.43 (t, J = 5.1 Hz, 2H, −CH2N3), 2.09 (s, 3H, Ac). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 192.87, 174.41, 137.98, 134.91, 130.17, 129.56, 129.43, 128.65, 126.81, 101.68, 98.93, 75.95, 71.16, 70.91, 70.82, 70.55, 70.48, 69.81, 69.31, 67.90, 63.49, 51.19, 51.07, 23.59. ESI-MS: [M + H]+ calcd for , 467.21; found (m/z), 467.38.
2-(2-(2-Azido)ethoxy)ethyl-2-actamido-4,6-O-benzyliden-2-desoxy-3-O-[2,3,4,6-tetra-O-acetyl-β-d-galactopyranosyl]-α-d-galactopyranoside (10).
The mixture of 2,3,4,6-Tetra-O-acetyl-α-d-galactopyranosylbromide (300 mg, 0.763 mmol), the acceptor 9 (180 mg, 0.386 mmol), and spherical molecular sieves in dichloromethane (5 ml) were stirred under argon for 2 h, then cooled to −40 °C. The solution of AgOTf (200 mg, 0.778 mmol) and tetramethylurea (180 mg, 1.55 mmol) in dichloromethane (2 ml) was added dropwise under argon. The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 16 h, then filtered through a Celite pad. The filtrated was diluted with EtOAc and washed with NaHCO3, and then dried over MgSO4 and filtered. The filtrated was concentrated in vacuo and subjected to flash chromatography (Hexane/EtOAc = 50/50) to give 10 (164 mg, 0.206 mmol, 53 %) as a white solid. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 7.53–7.57 (m, 2H, Har-Bzn), 7.33–7.41 (m, 3H, Har-Bzn), 5.98 (s, 1H, NH-GalNAc), 5.56 (s, 1H, −CH-Bzn), 4.95–5.40 (m, 4H, H-1, H-2′, H-4, H-4′), 4.75 (d, J1′,2′ = 7.8 Hz, 1H, H-1′), 4.46–4.53 (m, 1H, H-2), 3.73–4.44 (m, 9H, H-3, H-5, H-6a, H-6b, H-3′, H-5′, H-6a’, H-6b’), 3.66–3.74 (m, 10H, ethylene glycol chain), 3.43 (m, 2H, −CH2N3), 2.16 (s, 3H, Ac), 2.05 (2 s, 6H, Ac), 2.00 (s, 3H, Ac), 1.98 (s, 3H, Ac). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 192.93, 170.76, 170.62, 170.59, 17.039, 138.19, 136.86, 134.86, 130.14, 129.40, 129.19, 128.59, 128.53, 126.63, 126.49, 101.09, 99.04, 71.30, 71.13, 71.07, 70.91, 70.58, 70.44, 69.72, 69.28, 67.38, 67.34, 61.71, 51.04, 21.11, 21.05, 20.96, 20.90. ESI-MS: [M + H]+ calcd for , 797.31; found (m/z), 797.35.
2-(2-(2-Azido)ethoxy)ethyl-2-actamido-2-desoxy-3-O-[-β-d-galactopyranosyl]-α-d-galactopyranoside (2).
To the solution of 10 (131 mg, 0.164 mmol) in dichloromethane (5 ml) 80 % TFA solution was added at 0 °C. The mixture was stirred at 0 °C for 2 h and dried in vacuo. The residue was dissolved in dry MeOH (5 ml), and then treated with MeONa (0.5 M, 1 ml). The mixture was stirred under at room temperature for 3 h, then neutralized with Dowex (50 W X8 hydrogen form) and filtered. The filtrate was concentrated and subjected to G-10 size exclusion column to obtain the pure T antigen derivative 2 (63.7 mg, 118 mmol, 72 %) as a white solid after lyophilization. 1H NMR (D2O, 400 MHz): δ 4.94 (d, J1,2 = 3.6 Hz, 1H, H-1), 4.48 (d, J1,2 = 7.6 Hz, 1H, H-1′), 4.36 (dd, J1,2 = 3.6 Hz, J2,3 = 11.2 Hz, 1H, H-2), 4.26 (d, J4-5 = 2.4 Hz, 1H, H-4), 4.06 (dd, J3,4 = 2.8 Hz, J2,3 = 10.8 Hz, 1H, H-3), 3.62–4.05 (m, 18H, H-5, H-6a, H-6b, H-3′, H-4′, H-5′, H-6a’, H-6b’, ethylene glycol chain), 3.51–3.57 (m, 3H, H-2′, −CH2N3), 2.05 (s, 3H, Ac). 13C NMR (D2O, 150 MHz): δ 174.08, 104.30, 96.93, 76.85, 74.46, 72.05, 70.21, 70.12, 69.28, 69.08, 68.77, 68.31, 68.09, 66.03, 60.71, 60.45, 49.63, 48.02, 21.54. ESI-HRMS: [M + H]+ calcd for , 541.24; found (m/z), 541.23.
4.3. Synthesis of the cyclodextrin-based Gal-3 ligands
β-Cyclodextrin-alkyne (15).
per-6-amino β-cyclodextrin (13) (50 mg, 44.3 μmol) and NHS activated 4-pentynoic acid (14, 121 mg, 620 μmol) was dissolved in DMF (5 ml) with 1 % TEA, the mixture was stirred under Ar overnight and dried in vacuo. The residue was extracted with dichloromethane and water. The aqueous solution was concentrated under vacuo. The filtrate was concentrated and subjected to P2 size exclusion column to obtain the compound 15 (43.8 mg, 26.0 μmol, 59 %). 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 400 MHz) δ 5.85 (d, J = 6.8 Hz,7H, OH), 5.81 (s, 7H, OH), 4.83 (d, J1,2 = 3.2 Hz, 7H, H-1), 3.77 (d, J = 12.8 Hz, 7H, H-6a), 3.68 (m, 7H, H-5), 3.590 (m, 7H, H-3), 3.22–3.42 (m, 21H, H-2, H-4, H6b), 2.65 (s, 7H, CC-H), 2.3–2.45 (m, 28H, CH2-CH2). 13C NMR (DMSO-d6, 100 MHz) 171.04, 102.19, 83.81, 83.52, 72.58, 72.22, 71.00, 70.08, 33.85, 14.27. ESI-MS: [M + H]+ calcd for , 1688.67, fond (m/z), 1688.83.
β-Cyclodextrin-GalNAc (16).
β-Cyclodextrin-alkyne (15) (1.5 mg, 0.89 μmol), azido GalNAc derivative (1) (4.7 mg, 12 μmol), CuSO4 (0.4 mg, 2.5 μmol), and sodium ascorbate (2.4 mg, 13.3 μmol) were dissolved in distilled water. The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 24 h. The crude product was purified by G-25 size exclusion column to yield 16 (3.1 mg, 0.70 μmol, 79 %) as a white solid. 1H NMR (D2O, 400 MHz): δ 7.83 (br s, 7H, triazole), 4.92–5.10 (br, 7H, H-1 of Glc in CD), 4.89 (br, 7H, H-1 of GalNAc), 4.16 (dd, J1,2 = 3.7 Hz, J2,3 = 11.0, 7H, H-2 of GalNAc), 3.51–4.02 (m, 161H, the rest protons on the sugar rings, ethylene glycol chain), 2.84–3.08 (br, 14H, COCH2CH2-triazole), 2.47–2.86 (br, 14H, COCH2CH2-triazole), 2.01 (s, 21H, Ac). 13C NMR (D2O, 100 MHz): δ 174.83, 97.64, 71.40, 70.06, 69.83, 68.91, 68.21, 66.93, 61.63, 50.20, 22.35. ESI-HRMS: [M + 3H]3+ calcd for , 1446.64; found (m/z), 1446.66.
β-Cyclodextrin-TFD (17).
β-Cyclodextrin-alkyne (15) (1.5 mg, 0.89 μmol), azido TFD-Linker (2) (6.5 mg, 12 μmol), CuSO4 (0.4 mg, 2.5 μmol), and sodium ascorbate (2.4 mg, 13.3 μmol) were dissolved in distilled water. The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 24 h. The crude product was purified by G-25 size exclusion column to yield 17 (3.4 mg, 0.62 μmol, 70 %) as a white solid. 1H NMR (D2O, 400 MHz): δ 7.83 (br s, 7H, triazole), 4.92–5.10 (br, 7H, H-1 of Glc in CD), 4.89 (br, 7H, H-1 of GalNAc), 4.44 (d, J1,2 = 7.6 Hz, 7H, H-1 of Gal), 4.32 (dd, J1,2 = 3.5 Hz, J2,3 = 11.2 Hz, 7H, H-2 of GalNAc), 4.32 (br, J4,5 = 2.4 Hz, 7H, H-4 of GalNAc), 3.96 (br d, J2,3 = 10.8 Hz, 7H, H-3 of GalNAc), 3.48–4.00 (m, 189H, the rest protons on the sugar rings, ethylene glycol chain), 2.84–3.08 (br, 14H, COCH2CH2-triazole), 2.47–2.86 (br, 14H, COCH2CH2-triazole), 2.01 (s, 21H, Ac). 13C NMR (D2O, 150 MHz): δ 174.08, 104.30, 96.93, 76.85, 74.46, 72.03, 70.21, 70.12, 69.28, 68.77, 68.31, 68.09, 66.03, 60.71, 60.45, 49.63, 48.02, 21.54. ESI-HRMS: [M + 3H]3+ calcd for , 1824.76; found (m/z), 1824.71.
β-Cyclodextrin-Lactose (18).
β-Cyclodextrin-alkyne (15) (1.5 mg, 0.89 μmol), azido Lactose derivative (3) (6.3 mg, 12 μmol), CuSO4 (0.4 mg, 2.5 μmol), and sodium ascorbate (2.4 mg, 13.3 μmol) were dissolved in distilled water. The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 24 h. The crude product was purified by G-25 size exclusion column to yield 18 (3.4 mg, 0.66 μmol, 74 %) as a white solid. 1H NMR (D2O, 400 MHz): δ 7.84 (br s, 7H, triazole), 4.85–5.01 (br, 7H, H-1 of Glc in CD), 4.48 (d, J1,2 = 7.9 Hz, 7H, H-1 of Lactose), 4.45 (d, J1′,2′= 7.8 Hz, 7H, H-1′ of Lactose), 3.55–4.05 (m, 210H, the rest protons on the sugar rings, ethylene glycol chain), 2.84–3.08 (br, 14H, COCH2CH2-triazole), 2.47–2.86 (br, 14H, COCH2CH2-triazole). 13C NMR (D2O, 100 MHz): δ 103.37, 102.50, 78.82, 75.76, 75.16, 74.82, 73.20, 72.93, 71.35, 70.03, 69.86, 69.09, 68.94, 61.41, 60.48, 50.39. ESI-HRMS: [M + 3H]3+ calcd for ,1729.03; found (m/z), 1729.05.
4.4. Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) binding analysis
The SPR experiments and data analysis were performed following our previous method 40. The experiments were carried out by immobilizing Gal-3 onto a CM5 chip and flowing serial dilutions of synthetic inhibitor as the analyte. Gal-3 (25 μg/mL) in acetate solution (pH 5.0, 10 mM) was immobilized onto a CM5 chip with a density of 1000 response units (RU) using an amine coupling kit following the instructions of the manufacturer. A separate channel immobilized with ethanolamine was used as a reference channel. In all measurements, different analytes were diluted in HEPES buffer (0.01 M, pH 7.4) containing NaCl (0.15 M) and 0.005 % surfactant P20. The analysis was carried out at 25 °C with a flow rate of 30 μL/min. The analyte association time was 120 s and the dissociation time was 300 s. After each measurement, the chip was regenerated with MgCl2 solution (3 M). Data were collected with Biacore™ T200 system and analyzed with GraphPad Prism 7 for EC50 calculation.
4.5. Cell-based assays on the inhibition of Gal-3 binding to A549 cells by the synthetic multivalent glycan ligands
A549 cells were cultured in 96-well plate and fixed. The fixed cells were washed and blocked with 3 % BSA in PBS overnight at 4 °C, followed by incubation with biotinylated Gal-3 (5 μg/ml) pre-mixed with indicated concentration (3 ~ 300 μM) of multivalent compounds (16, 17, 18) for 1 h at 4 °C. The binding was revealed by incubation with streptavidin-conjugated horseradish peroxidase (HRP) followed by TMB. The reaction was stopped with 1 M HCl and the optical density (OD) at 450 nm from each well was measured by SpectraMax 340 plate reader (Molecular Device). The OD of each sample with inhibitors was compared with a standard curve with different concentration of Gal-3 vs OD to interpolated the “relative concentration”, which was used to calculated the percentage inhibition (%) = (original concentration-relative concentration)/original concentration × 100. The percentage inhibition over inhibitor concentration was shown. EC50 of each inhibitor was calculated with GraphPad Prism’s nonlinear fit function [dose–response-special, asymmetric (five parameter), X is concentration] to interpolate the concentration of inhibitor to achieve 50 % inhibition.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
We thank Dr. Jared Orwenyo and Dr. Hui Cai for technical assistance and insightful discussions. This work was supported in parts by the National Institutes of Health (NIH grants R01GM080374 to L.X.W. and R01GM070589 to G.R.V.) and the National Science Foundation (NSF grant IOS-1656720 to G.R.V.).
Footnotes
Declaration of Competing Interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Appendix A. Supplementary material
Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmc.2022.116974.
Data availability
All experimental details and data are described in the manuscript and in the supporting information
References
- 1.Rabinovich GA, Toscano MA. Turning ‘sweet’ on immunity: galectin-glycan interactions in immune tolerance and inflammation. Nat Rev Immunol. 2009;9: 338–352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Vasta GR. Roles of galectins in infection. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2009;7:424–438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Vasta GR. Galectins as pattern recognition receptors: structure, function, and evolution. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2012;946:21–36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Drickamer K, Taylor ME. Recent insights into structures and functions of C-type lectins in the immune system. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2015;34:26–34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Tsaneva M, Van Damme EJM. 130 years of Plant Lectin Research. Glycoconj J. 2020; 37:533–551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Lee RT, Lee YC. Affinity enhancement by multivalent lectin-carbohydrate interaction. Glycoconj J. 2000;17:543–551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Deniaud D, Julienne K, Gouin SG. Insights in the rational design of synthetic multivalent glycoconjugates as lectin ligands. Org Biomol Chem. 2011;9:966–979. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Muller C, Despras G, Lindhorst TK. Organizing multivalency in carbohydrate recognition. Chem Soc Rev. 2016;45:3275–3302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Di Lella S, Sundblad V, Cerliani JP, et al. When galectins recognize glycans: from biochemistry to physiology and back again. Biochemistry. 2011;50:7842–7857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Varki A. Biological roles of glycans. Glycobiology. 2017;27:3–49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Sundblad V, Croci DO, Rabinovich GA. Regulated expression of galectin-3, a multifunctional glycan-binding protein, in haematopoietic and non-haematopoietic tissues. Histol Histopathol. 2011;26:247–265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Guha P, Kaptan E, Bandyopadhyaya G, et al. Cod glycopeptide with picomolar affinity to galectin-3 suppresses T-cell apoptosis and prostate cancer metastasis. PNAS. 2013;110:5052–5057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Pieters RJ. Inhibition and detection of galectins. ChemBioChem. 2006;7:721–728. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Vuong L, Kouverianou E, Rooney CM, et al. An Orally Active Galectin-3 Antagonist Inhibits Lung Adenocarcinoma Growth and Augments Response to PD-L1 Blockade. Cancer Res. 2019;79:1480–1492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Stegmayr J, Zetterberg F, Carlsson MC, et al. Extracellular and intracellular small-molecule galectin-3 inhibitors. Sci Rep. 2019;9:2186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Xu L, Hartz RA, Beno BR, et al. Synthesis, Structure-Activity Relationships, and In Vivo Evaluation of Novel Tetrahydropyran-Based Thiodisaccharide Mimics as Galectin-3 Inhibitors. J Med Chem. 2021;64:6634–6655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Nita-Lazar M, Banerjee A, Feng C, et al. Desialylation of airway epithelial cells during influenza virus infection enhances pneumococcal adhesion via galectin binding. Mol Immunol. 2015;65:1–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Yu LG, Andrews N, Zhao Q, et al. Galectin-3 interaction with Thomsen-Friedenreich disaccharide on cancer-associated MUC1 causes increased cancer cell endothelial adhesion. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:773–781. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Khaldoyanidi SK, Glinsky VV, Sikora L, et al. MDA-MB-435 human breast carcinoma cell homo- and heterotypic adhesion under flow conditions is mediated in part by Thomsen-Friedenreich antigen-galectin-3 interactions. J Biol Chem. 2003;278: 4127–4134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Laaf D, Bojarova P, Pelantova H, Kren V, Elling L. Tailored Multivalent Neo-Glycoproteins: Synthesis, Evaluation, and Application of a Library of Galectin-3-Binding Glycan Ligands. Bioconjug Chem. 2017;28:2832–2840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Bocker S, Elling L. Biotinylated N-Acetyllactosamine- and N, N-Diacetyllactosamine-Based Oligosaccharides as Novel Ligands for Human Galectin-3. Bioengineering (Basel). 2017;4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Fischoder T, Laaf D, Dey C, Elling L. Enzymatic Synthesis of N-Acetyllactosamine (LacNAc) Type 1 Oligomers and Characterization as Multivalent Galectin Ligands. Molecules. 2017;22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Gouin SG, Garcia Fernandez JM, Vanquelef E, et al. Multimeric lactoside “click clusters” as tools to investigate the effect of linker length in specific interactions with peanut lectin, galectin-1, and −3. ChemBioChem. 2010;11:1430–1442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Hou Y, Cao S, Li X, et al. One-step synthesis of dual clickable nanospheres via ultrasonic-assisted click polymerization for biological applications. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2014;6:16909–16917. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Goodman CK, Wolfenden ML, Nangia-Makker P, Michel AK, Raz A, Cloninger MJ. Multivalent scaffolds induce galectin-3 aggregation into nanoparticles. Beilstein J Org Chem. 2014;10:1570–1577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Cousin JM, Cloninger MJ. Glycodendrimers: tools to explore multivalent galectin-1 interactions. Beilstein J Org Chem. 2015;11:739–747. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Wolfenden M, Cousin J, Nangia-Makker P, Raz A, Cloninger M. Glycodendrimers and Modified ELISAs: Tools to Elucidate Multivalent Interactions of Galectins 1 and 3. Molecules. 2015;20:7059–7096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Bernardi S, Fezzardi P, Rispoli G, et al. Clicked and long spaced galactosyl- and lactosylcalix[4]arenes: new multivalent galectin-3 ligands. Beilstein J Org Chem. 2014;10:1672–1680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Andre S, Kaltner H, Furuike T, Nishimura S, Gabius HJ. Persubstituted cyclodextrin-based glycoclusters as inhibitors of protein-carbohydrate recognition using purified plant and mammalian lectins and wild-type and lectin-gene-transfected tumor cells as targets. Bioconjug Chem. 2004;15:87–98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Andre S, Jarikote DV, Yan D, et al. Synthesis of bivalent lactosides and their activity as sensors for differences between lectins in inter- and intrafamily comparisons. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2012;22:313–318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Vrasidas I, Andre S, Valentini P, et al. Rigidified multivalent lactose molecules and their interactions with mammalian galectins: a route to selective inhibitors. Org Biomol Chem. 2003;1:803–810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Zhang H, Laaf D, Elling L, Pieters RJ. Thiodigalactoside-Bovine Serum Albumin Conjugates as High-Potency Inhibitors of Galectin-3: An Outstanding Example of Multivalent Presentation of Small Molecule Inhibitors. Bioconjug Chem. 2018;29: 1266–1275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Freichel T, Laaf D, Hoffmann M, et al. Effects of linker and liposome anchoring on lactose-functionalized glycomacromolecules as multivalent ligands for binding galectin-3. RSC Adv. 2019;9:23484–23497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Filipova M, Bojarova P, Rodrigues Tavares M, et al. Glycopolymers for Efficient Inhibition of Galectin-3. In Vitro Proof of Efficacy Using Suppression of T Lymphocyte Apoptosis and Tumor Cell Migration. Biomacromolecules. 2020;21: 3122–3133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Wang H, Huang W, Orwenyo J, Banerjee A, Vasta GR, Wang LX. Design and synthesis of glycoprotein-based multivalent glyco-ligands for influenza hemagglutinin and human galectin-3. Bioorg Med Chem. 2013;21:2037–2044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Zhang Q, Su L, Collins J, et al. Dendritic cell lectin-targeting sentinel-like unimolecular glycoconjugates to release an anti-HIV drug. J Am Chem Soc. 2014;136: 4325–4332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Ni J, Singh S, Wang LX. Improved preparation of perallylated cyclodextrins: facile synthesis of cyclodextrin-based polycationic and polyanionic compounds. Carbohydr Res. 2002;337:217–220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Srinivasachari S, Fichter KM, Reineke TM. Polycationic beta-cyclodextrin “click clusters”: monodisperse and versatile scaffolds for nucleic acid delivery. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:4618–4627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Ortiz-Mellet C, Benito JM, Fernandez JMG, et al. Cyclodextrin-scaffolded glycoclusters. Chem Eur J. 1998;4:2523–2531. [Google Scholar]
- 40.Alali U, Vallin A, Bil A, et al. The uncommon strong inhibition of alpha-glucosidase by multivalent glycoclusters based on cyclodextrin scaffolds. Org Biomol Chem. 2019; 17:7228–7237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Jimenez Blanco JL, Ortiz Mellet C, Garcia Fernandez JM. Multivalency in heterogeneous glycoenvironments: hetero-glycoclusters, -glycopolymers and -glycoassemblies. Chem Soc Rev. 2013;42:4518–4531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Heine V, Hovorkova M, Vlachova M, et al. Immunoprotective neo-glycoproteins: Chemoenzymatic synthesis of multivalent glycomimetics for inhibition of cancer-related galectin-3. Eur J Med Chem. 2021;220, 113500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Hoffmann M, Hayes MR, Pietruszka J, Elling L. Synthesis of the Thomsen-Friedenreich-antigen (TF-antigen) and binding of Galectin-3 to TF-antigen presenting neo-glycoproteins. Glycoconj J. 2020;37:457–470. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Brocke C, Kunz H. Synthetic tumor-associated glycopeptide antigens from the tandem repeat sequence of the epithelial mucin MUC4. Synthesis. 2004:525–542. [Google Scholar]
- 45.Kato H, Uzawa H, Nagatsuka T, et al. Preparation and evaluation of lactose-modified monoliths for the adsorption and decontamination of plant toxins and lectins. Carbohydr Res. 2011;346:1820–1826. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Ashton PR, Koeniger R, Stoddart JF, Alker D, Harding VD. Amino Acid Derivatives of β-Cyclodextrin. J Org Chem. 1996;61:903–908. [Google Scholar]
- 47.Blackman ML, Royzen M, Fox JM. Tetrazine ligation: fast bioconjugation based on inverse-electron-demand Diels-Alder reactivity. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130: 13518–13519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Iurisci I, Cumashi A, Sherman AA, et al. Consorzio Interuniversitario Nazionale Per la, B.-O., Synthetic inhibitors of galectin-1 and -3 selectively modulate homotypic cell aggregation and tumor cell apoptosis. Anticancer Res. 2009;29:403–410. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Ahmed H, Cappello F, Rodolico V, Vasta GR. Evidence of heavy methylation in the galectin 3 promoter in early stages of prostate adenocarcinoma: development and validation of a methylated marker for early diagnosis of prostate cancer. Transl Oncol. 2009;2:146–156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Bernardes GJL, Kikkeri R, Maglinao M, et al. Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of carbohydrate-functionalizedcyclodextrins and liposomes for hepatocyte-specific targeting. Org. Biomol. Chem 2010;8:4987–4996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All experimental details and data are described in the manuscript and in the supporting information





