Skip to main content
BJS Open logoLink to BJS Open
letter
. 2023 Jul 17;7(4):zrad070. doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrad070

Comment on: Quality of life after open versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: long-term results from a randomized clinical trial

Sharon Barker 1,, Agastya Patel 2,3, Thomas Satyadas 4
PMCID: PMC10351569  PMID: 37459136

Dear Editor

We read with great interest the article by Johansen et al. assessing quality of life (QoL) of patients undergoing minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) and open distal pancreatectomy (ODP) in a randomized clinical trial setting1. It is encouraging to observe the increasing interest in patient-specific outcomes to inform clinical decision-making.

It is well known that multimodal surgical prehabilitation, including exercise, nutrition, smoking/alcohol cessation, and psychological counselling, improves postoperative outcomes as well as long-term QoL2,3. Based on the LAPOP trial protocol and the present study, we were unable to determine the prehabilitation programme the participants underwent leading up to surgery. Additionally, it would be interesting to assess whether there were differences in length of prehabilitation and adherence with individual components between the arms, as these are crucial factors affecting postoperative outcomes4.

A key result of the present study is demonstrating that patients within the MIDP arm had similar scores in several QoL domains at 2 years, compared with a matched Swedish general population. One of the important confounders in QoL analysis is socioeconomic factors, such as education level, income status etc. A recent Swedish study identified that lower socioeconomical and professional status is associated with poorer postoperative health-related QoL5. Hence, it is also important to assess whether the arms differed in terms of their socioeconomic status, and how this might influence the long-term QoL outcomes following distal pancreatectomy.

In conclusion, Johansen et al. provide seminal data in relation to long-term QoL following MIDP and ODP, which adds to the rationale of the already standard minimally invasive approach for distal pancreatectomy. However, further information on the aforementioned variables may provide a more complete picture of the issue at hand. Lastly, as the majority of patients had benign indications, there remains a need to research the impact of rehabilitation/supportive interventions on QoL following DP for oncological indications, where more extensive support may be required.

Disclosure

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Contributor Information

Sharon Barker, Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK.

Agastya Patel, Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK; Department of General, Endocrine and Transplant Surgery, First Doctoral School of Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland.

Thomas Satyadas, Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK.

Author contributions

Sharon Barker (Conceptualization, Investigation, Validation, Visualization, Writing—original draft, Writing—review & editing), Agastya Patel (Conceptualization, Investigation, Project administration, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing—review & editing), and Thomas Satyadas (Conceptualization, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing—review & editing).

References

  • 1. Johansen K, Lindhoff Larsson A, Lundgren L, Gasslander T, Hjalmarsson C, Sandström Pet al. . Quality of life after open versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: long-term results from a randomized clinical trial. BJS Open 2023;7:zrad002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Bongers BC, Dejong CHC, den Dulk M. Enhanced recovery after surgery programmes in older patients undergoing hepatopancreatobiliary surgery: what benefits might prehabilitation have? Eur J Surg Oncol 2021;47:551–559 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Daniels SL, Lee MJ, George J, Kerr K, Moug S, Wilson TRet al. . Prehabilitation in elective abdominal cancer surgery in older patients: systematic review and meta-analysis. BJS Open 2020;4:1022–1041 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Bundred JR, Kamarajah SK, Hammond JS, Wilson CH, Prentis J, Pandanaboyana S. Prehabilitation prior to surgery for pancreatic cancer: a systematic review. Pancreatology 2020;20:1243–1250 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Gryth K, Persson C, Näslund I, Sundbom M, Näslund E, Stenberg E. The influence of socioeconomic factors on quality-of-life after laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery. Obes Surg 2019;29:3569–3576 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BJS Open are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES