Abstract
The long term effects of formaldehyde on the respiratory tract have been investigated in a group of 164 workers exposed daily to the chemical during the production of urea formaldehyde resin, together with 129 workers not exposed to free formaldehyde. Exposure was classified as high (corresponding to an eight hour time weighted exposure of more than 2.0 ppm), medium (0.6 to 2.0 ppm), or low (0.1 to 0.5 ppm). Twenty five per cent of workers had had high exposure at some time and 17% moderate exposure. Both the exposed and unexposed groups had an annual assessment that included lung function. The proportion with self reported respiratory symptoms was similar in the two groups, 12% and 16% reporting breathlessness on hurrying and 26% and 20% wheezing. The initial forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) was within 0.5 l (approximately one standard deviation (SD)) of the predicted value (by age and height) in 65% of the exposed and 59% of unexposed workers and more than 0.5 l below the predicted value in 9% of exposed and 11% of unexposed workers. The mean decline in FEV1 was 42 ml a year (SD 45) in the exposed group and 41 ml a year in the unexposed group (SD 40 ml a year). The rate of decline showed the expected association with smoking in the unexposed group, but in the exposed group the mean rate of decline in the never smokers was similar to that in current smokers. There were, however, relatively few never smokers and considerable variation in the rates of decline. In the exposed group no association was found between the rate of decline and indices of exposure to formaldehyde. Thus there is no evidence from this study of an excess of respiratory symptoms or decline in lung function in the workers exposed to formaldehyde. The similar rate of decline of FEV1 however in never smokers and smokers of the exposed group is consistent with findings of other studies for workers exposed to formaldehyde and to toluene di-isocyanate.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Acheson E. D., Barnes H. R., Gardner M. J., Osmond C., Pannett B., Taylor C. P. Formaldehyde in the British chemical industry. An occupational cohort study. Lancet. 1984 Mar 17;1(8377):611–616. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(84)91007-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Alexandersson R., Hedenstierna G. Pulmonary function in wood workers exposed to formaldehyde: a prospective study. Arch Environ Health. 1989 Jan-Feb;44(1):5–11. doi: 10.1080/00039896.1989.9935865. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bracken M. J., Leasa D. J., Morgan W. K. Exposure to formaldehyde: relationship to respiratory symptoms and function. Can J Public Health. 1985 Sep-Oct;76(5):312–316. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Craigen A. A. The control of dermatitis in a plastics factory. J Soc Occup Med. 1975 Oct;25(4):127–132. doi: 10.1093/occmed/25.4.127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Diem J. E., Jones R. N., Hendrick D. J., Glindmeyer H. W., Dharmarajan V., Butcher B. T., Salvaggio J. E., Weill H. Five-year longitudinal study of workers employed in a new toluene diisocyanate manufacturing plant. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1982 Sep;126(3):420–428. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1982.126.3.420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hendrick D. J., Lane D. J. Occupational formalin asthma. Br J Ind Med. 1977 Feb;34(1):11–18. doi: 10.1136/oem.34.1.11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- KORY R. C., CALLAHAN R., BOREN H. G., SYNER J. C. The Veterans Administration-Army cooperative study of pulmonary function. I. Clinical spirometry in normal men. Am J Med. 1961 Feb;30:243–258. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(61)90096-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Soter N. A., Wasserman S. I., Austen K. F. Cold urticaria: release into the circulation of histamine and eosinophil chemotactic factor of anaphylaxis during cold challenge. N Engl J Med. 1976 Mar 25;294(13):687–690. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197603252941302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]