Abstract
Objective:
Human papillomavirus (HPV) has been identified as an important causative factor in cervical cancer development. Cervical cancer is the fourth most prevalent malignant tumor among women globally. The purpose of this study was to investigate the prevalence and genotyping sequences of HPV in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) cervical tissue using conventional polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and HPV-DNA sequencing.
Material and Methods:
Retrospective cross-sectional study. Forty (FFPE) blocks with different cervical lesions were taken; patients’ ages ranged from 24 to 65 years. Detection and sequencing of HPV DNA were done by conventional PCR (L1 gene), which was achieved by universal PCR primers (MY09/11 oligonucleotides). Then sequencing and phylogenetic tree was constructed.
Results:
Nine samples were found positive and detected by conventional PCR, they were identified in CIN1 and SCC at 7.5% (n=3) for each, 5.0% (n=2) KA, and 2.5% (n=1) in CIN3 cases, after sequencing were submitted to GenBank and accession numbers were obtained. The phylogenetic tree was constructed and the aligned sequences showed high homology with the nucleotide sequence of the references from the Genbank database. HPV 11, 16, 18, 22, 33, 52, and 58 were found to have little nucleotide heterogeneity and thus no amino acid heterogeneity.
Conclusion:
Sequencing and phylogenetic analysis of circulating HPV types in Duhok provides very essential data about nucleotides and amino acid heterogeneity, to reveal genetic diversity with strains included in the vaccines that have not been introduced to Iraq yet.
Key Words: Human papilloma virus, cervical lesions, molecular detection, DNA-sequencing, phylogenetic tree
Introduction
HPV identified as an important causative factor in cervical cancer development (Jalilian et al., 2017; Kamal et al., 2021). Cervical cancer is women’s fourth most prevalent malignant tumor globally (Bray et al., 2018). More than 200 genotypes of HPV have been identified based on DNA sequences (Mühr et al., 2018). HPV genotypes are divided into several categories. High-risk types (HR–HPV) are mainly 16 and 18, as well as 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, 59, 68, 73, and 82. HPV types 26, 53, and 66 were categorized as probably high-risk, and HPV types 6, 11, 40, 42, 43, 44, 54, 61, 70, 72, and 81 were categorized as low-risk types (LR-HPV) (Ehteram et al., 2019). Different studies from neighbor countries revealed that most frequent HR-HPV and LR-HPV associated with genital lesions are HPV16, HPV 6 respectively (Chalabiani et al., 2017). Infection with HPV is suspected by the presence of clinical lesions and by cytology, histology, and colposcopy, which are all subjective and often inaccurate (Liao and Li., 2019). Most cervical HPV infections are asymptomatic and the immune system naturally eliminated 70% of them within 12-24 months (Giuliano et al., 2011). The understanding that HPV is the major cause of cervical malignant tumors has led to the creation of advanced screening methods. Early diagnosis and treatment of precancerous conditions can restrain the progress of cervical cancer (Venkatas and Singh., 2020). The risk of precancerous lesions of the cervix in women is primarily explained by a cytological screening of cells. Molecular diagnostic tests that distinguish between high and low-risk HPV genotypes are highly sensitive and specific, detect HPV DNA, and are used as additional tests in cytological studies (Ghosh et al., 2014). DNA sequencing of purified DNA which is amplified by conventional PCR using consensus primers MY09/11 is another technique to detect the genotype and alignment with reference strains (Depuydt et al., 2007). Since the HPV vaccine is proved to be an efficient strategy to prevent cervical cancer in different countries therefore it is the next approach for control of these infections. The phylogenetic analysis wil help alignment of circulating strains with those included in HPV vaccine (Sopian etal., 2019). This study aimed to investigate the prevalence and genotyping sequences of HPV in samples obtained from FFPE cervical tissue by HPV-DNA sequencing.
Materials and Methods
Study design and population
This retrospective cross-sectional study included FFPE block samples of 40 patients with different cervical lesions in the period from July 2020 to December 2021. The samples were taken from archives of histopathology departments in Duhok central lab public health and VIN private laboratories. Patients’ ages ranged from 24 to 65 years (Mean: 42 years STD ± 10.5).
Sample collection
The FFPE-fixed biopsy was sectioned. Five continuous sections with a thickness of 10 µm were taken from each biopsy, with a new blade for each one to avoid cross-contamination. Two outer sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin and examined microscopically to confirm the diagnosis that was classified as; 27.5% (n=11) and showed Koilocytotic atypia (KA), 10.0% (n=4) unremarkable (non-neoplastic) pathology negative for Intraepithelial lesions or malignancy (NILM), 20.0% (n=8) Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) Malignant, 22.5% (n=9) Cervical intraepithelial neoplastic (CIN1), 12.5% (n=5) CIN2, and 7.5% (n=3) CIN3.
DNA extraction
For Human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA extraction, three internal sections were placed in a 1.5 ml Eppendorf tube. Xylene (1ml) was added to the microtube containing the tissue section, deparaffinized, and vortexed for 10 seconds to mix vigorously. Then centrifuged at 20,000 rpm for 2 min and the supernatant was removed. This procedure was repeated 3 times to remove paraffin residue. The pellet was then washed 3 times with 1ml of ethanol (96-100%), centrifuged at 20000 rpm for 2 min, and the supernatant was then discarded. The pellet was air-dried at 37°C for 10-15 minutes until all residual ethanol had evaporated. After tissue deparaffinization, DNA was extracted using the QIAamp DNA FFPE Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
HPV DNA detection and sequencing
The PCR was performed using consensus MY09/11 oligonucleotide primers to amplify the 450pb sequence from the L1 region of HPV. Amplification generally consists of a denaturation step were 40 cycles at 94°C for 1 min, followed by, an annealing step for 1 min at 55°C, an extension step for I min at 72°C, a final extension of 1 cycle at 72°C for 5 min (Venceslau et al., 2014) Table1.
Table 1.
Genetic Oligonucleotide Primers Used for DNA of HPV Detection (Venceslau et al., 2014)
| Primers | Sequence | Fragment Size | Protocol (PCR) | Conditions (PCR) |
| MY09 MY11 |
5’CGTCCMARRGGAWACTGATC3’ 5’GCMCAGGGWCATAAYAATGG3’ |
450pb | 15 mM MgCl2 (buffer 1×), 800 µM of dNTPs, 50 pmol/µl of each oligonucleotide primer, 1.25 U from Hot Star Taq DNA polymerase |
40 cycles 94°C/1min 55°C/1min 72°C/1min 1 cycle 72°C/1min |
To confirm the presence of HPV DNA fragments, 10μL of each PCR product was visualized on a 2% agarose gel electrophoresis using RedSafe Nucleic Acid (iNtRON Biotechnology) staining.
The PCR product samples were then sent for DNA sequencing by universal PCR primers (MY09/11) to Macrogen (Macrogen Co., Seoul, Korea). Multiple alignments were performed using BioEdit (version 7.2.5.0) software and submitted in Fasta format to the GenBank database and analyzed based on the best sequence homology search was conducted using BLAST ( Basic Local Alignment Search Tool ), which is available at the National Center Biotechnology Information (NCBI) online web site, and accession numbers (ACCN) were obtained. The phylogenetic tree was constructed by the maximum likelihood using MEGA 11.0 software and identified the evolutionary relationships between the analyzed sequences.
Results
In this study, among (n=40) FFPE cervical specimens, the L1 gene HPV was amplified by specific primers MY09/11. Nine samples were found positive and detected by PCR (Figure 1). Patients’ ages ranged from 24 to 65 years (Mean: 42 years STD ± 10.5), and participants were classified into five age groups. HPV was most prevalent in the 31–40 age group and there were no significant differences (p= 0.909) (Table 2). The virus was identified in CIN1 and SCC at 7.5% (n=3) for each, 5.0% (n=2) KA, and 2.5% (n=1) in CIN3 cases (Table 3).
Figure 1.
Agarose Gel Electrophoresis of Products of HPV PCR. Lane L, 1000bp DNA ladder; lanes 2,3,4,6,8,9,11, and 12, HPV positive samples contained 450bp amplicon from the HPV genome
Table 2.
HPV and Age Groups
| Result | Age Groups N (%) | Total | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21-30 | 31-40 | 41-50 | 51-60 | 61-70 | ||
| Positive | 1 (2.5%) | 4 (10.0%) | 3 (7.5%) | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (2.5%) | 9 (22.5%) |
| Negative | 4 (10.0%) | 12 (30.0%) | 9 (22.5%) | 3 (7.5%) | 3 (7.5%) | 31 (77.5%) |
| Total | 5 (12.5%) | 16 (40.0%) | 12 (30.0%) | 3 (7.5%) | 4 (10.0%) | 40 (100.0%) |
χ2 test used, P=0.909
Table 3.
Human Papilloma Virus Results and Morphologic Diagnosis
| Results | morphologic diagnosis N (%) | Total | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NILM | KA | CIN1 | CIN2 | CIN3 | SCC | ||
| Positive | 0 (0.0%) | 2 (5.0%) | 3 (7.5%) | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (2.5%) | 3 (7.5%) | 9 (22.5%) |
| Negative | 4 (10.0%) | 9 (22.5%) | 6 (15.0%) | 5 (12.5%) | 2 (5.0%) | 5 (12.5%) | 31 (77.5%) |
| Total | 4 (10.0%) | 11 (27.5%) | 9 (22.5%) | 5 (12.5%) | 3 (7.5%) | 8 (20.0%) | 40 (100.0%) |
χ2 test used, p= 0.471
Sequence analysis and phylogenetic tree
The positive PCR products were sent for DNA sequencing, then sequencing was analyzed and submitted to GenBank in which the accession numbers (ACCN), OM963133, ON210811, ON221505, ON221506, ON221508, ON221509, ON221510, ON367531, and ON191582 were obtained. The results for all samples; showed the evolutionary relations between the studied strains with the nearest similar species of the HPV genus found in the Genbank data.
Sequences were compared with the data available at the NCBI-Genbank based on the highest percentage or lowest value. The ratio of similarity to the identified strains in the study with other strains from NCBI-Genbank ranged from 99-100% as in Table 4.
Table 4.
Representative Genotyping Analysis of HPV Sample Isolates based on Capsid Protein (L1) Gene According to a Phylogenetic Tree and NCBI –BLAST Genotypes Identity (%) Analysis
| No. | Accession Number | Country | %Identities | Author, year |
| 1 | ON221510:HPV11 | Duhok/Iraq | Current study, 2022 | |
| 2 | M14119 | Germany | 100.00% | (Dartmann et al., 1986) |
| 3 | JN644142 | Iran | 100.00% | (Eftekhaar et al., 2017) |
| 4 | MW404328 | Hungary | 100.00% | (Nagy et al., 2021) |
| 5 | JQ773408 | Thailand | 100.00% | (Chansaenroj et al., 2012) |
| 6 | EU056630 | Ireland | 99.74% | (Menton et al., 2009) |
| 7 | ON191582: HPV16 | Duhok/Iraq | Current study, 2022 | |
| 8 | ON367531 | Duhok/Iraq | 100.00% | Current study, 2022 |
| 9 | LC456183 | Japan | 100.00% | (Galati et al., 2019) |
| 10 | MH937413 | Italy | 100.00% | (Hirose et al., 2019) |
| 11 | MZ484662 | Pakistan | 100.00% | (Minhas et al., 2022) |
| 12 | MN966564 | Iran | 100.00% | (Mahmoudvand et al., 2022) |
| 13 | MH057735 | Saudi | 97.97% | (Sait et al., 2019) |
| 14 | ON210811: HPV18 | Duhok/Iraq | Current study, 2022 | |
| 15 | MH057749 | Saudi | 100.00% | (Sait et al., 2019) |
| 16 | MH028437 | Italy | 100.00% | (Frati et al., 2020) |
| 17 | KY595177 | Serbia | 100.00% | (Kovacevic et al., 2019) |
| 18 | MF288727 | Netherlands | 100.00% | (van der Weele et al., 2018) |
| 19 | LC508994 | Japan | 100.00% | (Yamaguchi-Naka et al., |
| 20 | KT365828 | Iraq | 99.05% | (Al-Malkey M. K, 2018) |
| 21 | ON221505: HPV22 | Duhok/Iraq | Current study, 2022 | |
| 22 | U31780 | Germany | 99.74% | (Kremsdorf et al., 1984) |
| 23 | L38912 | Netherlands | 99.62% | (Berkhout, 1995) |
| 24 | U21866 | Singapore | 99.60% | (Chan et al., 1995) |
| 25 | ON221508:HPV33 | Duhok/Iraq | Current study, 2022 | |
| 26 | GU797244 | USA | 100.00% | (Boyd et al., 2011) |
| 27 | GQ479014 | Canada | 100.00% | (Cornut et al., 2010) |
| 28 | KU550674 | China | 99.71% | (Chen et al., 2016) |
| 29 | FJ202006 | Brazil | 99.71% | (Raiol et al., 2009) |
| 30 | HM596529 | Greece | 99.12% | (Ntova et al., 2012) |
| 31 | EU056641 | Ireland | 99.12% | (Menton et al., 2009) |
| 32 | ON221506:HPV52 | Duhok/Iraq | Current study, 2022 | |
| 33 | KJ676085 | Croatia | 100.00% | (Zhang et al., 2014) |
| 34 | KT799936 | China | 100.00% | (Zhang et al., 2016) |
| 35 | EU077220 | Canada | 100.00% | (Gagnon et al., 2007) |
| 36 | KU050117 | Ecuador | 100.00% | (Bedoya-Pilozo et al., 2018) |
| 37 | LC270063 | Japan | 100.00% | (Tenjimbayashi et al., 2017) |
| 38 | OM963133: HPV58 | Duhok/Iraq | Current study, 2022 | |
| 39 | ON221509 | Duhok/Iraq | 100.00% | Current study, 2022 |
| No. | Accession Number | Country | %Identities | Author, year |
| 40 | KU721777 | China | 99.76% | (Wang et al., 2016) |
| 41 | LR861919 | Luxembourg | 99.76% | (Latsuzbaia et al., 2020) |
| 42 | DQ057325 | USA | 99.76% | (Calleja-Macias et al., 2005) |
| 43 | AJ621382 | Cyprus | 99.28% | (Neophytou P.I., 2004) |
| 44 | HM639621 | South Korea | 99.04% | (Chan et al., 2011) |
Two isolates of HPV16 (ON367531 and ON191582) were detected and the aligned sequence showed high homology with the nucleotide sequence of the references from the Genbank database (Figure 2). HPV18 was detected in one sample (ON210811) representing, the aligned sequence that showed high homology with the nucleotide sequence of HPV18 (MH057749) isolated in Saudi Arabia (Figure 3).
Figure 2.
Two isolates of HPV16 (ON367531 and ON191582) were performed by sequence analysis after alignment (ClustalW) of the sequences with reference strains using BioEdit (version 7.2.5.0). The point mutation (base substitution) occurred at positions 6693, 6719, 6852, 6860, 6863, 6968, and 6992, to the reference sequence (ACCN: MH057735) isolated in Saudi Arabia
Figure 3.
One Isolate of HPV18 (ON210811) was Performed by Sequence Analysis after Alignment (ClustalW) of the Sequences with Reference Strains Using BioEdit (version 7.2.5.0). The point mutation (base substitution) occurred at positions 6719, 6749, and 6917 to the reference sequence (ACCN: KT365828) isolated in Iraq
The results of the phylogenetic analysis showed that the isolated DNA of HPV33 in Duhok/Iraq (one sample) ON221508 has a kinship with those in GQ479014 Canada and GU797222 in the USA. The HPV52 identity in one case (ON221506) was the match found with the HPV52 L1 region (KT799936) isolated from Chinese patients having cervical cancer. The two HPV58 (OM963133 and ON221509) identity matches were found with the HPV58 L1 region sequence (MT267729) isolated from Iran among patients with cervical cancer. The HPV11 (ON221510) identity match was found with L1 region sequence HPV11 (KU721777) isolated from China patients, while, HPV22 isolated in one case (ON221505) was found to match identity with HPV22 isolated from macules on the chest of an Italian epidermodysplasia verruciformis patient (Table 4).
A phylogenetic tree was constructed using the genomic sequence deposited under the ACCN, OM963133, ON210811, ON221505, ON221506, ON221508, ON221509, ON221510, ON191582, and ON367531 and analyzed against HPV genotype references sequences. Bootstrap test analysis was performed (1000 replicates) to estimate the reliability of the obtained branching patterns in the phylogenetic trees (Figure 4).
Figure 4.

Phylogenetic Analysis of L1 Gene Using Selected HPV: The phylogenetic tree was constructed by the maximum likelihood method of MEGA 11.0 software, the percentage of the replication tree in which the relevant taxa are clustered together in the bootstrap test (1000 replications) is shown next to the branches
Discussion
There are 12.2 million females over 15 years of age in Iraq who are at risk of developing cervical cancer. Current estimates that 286 women are diagnosed with cervical cancer each year and 193 die from the disease. Cervical cancer is the 15th most common cancer in Iraqi women and the 12th most common cancer in women between 15-44 years of age (Bruni el al., 2021). Human papillomavirus (HPV) distribution varies in different populations, countries, and even in different parts of a country. Data on the burden of HPV on the Iraqi population are not yet available. However, in West Asia, including Iraq, an estimated 2.5% of women in the general population will always be infected with HPV 16/18 in the cervix at a given time, and 72.4% of (invasive cervical cancers will result in HPV 16 or HPV18 (Bruni el al., 2021).
The prevalence and detection of HPV in cervical cancer specimens using various technical tools have been published in many reports from Iraq, but an analysis of genetic diversity based on the L1 region in this study was done for the first time.
We found HPV DNA in just 22.5% of the specimens in our research, which is substantially lower than in previous PCR investigations. This result might be explained by inadequate DNA extraction from fixation. Fixing pathology specimens and embedding them in paraffin wax are critical stages in preparing tissues for microscopic examination and long-term storage
The MY09/MY11 consensus primer, which targets the conserved 450bp conserved sequence of the HPV L1 region, is one of the most commonly used in conventional PCR assays, and previous studies have shown that it has some limitations, especially a low sensitivity (Gravitt et al., 2000; Depuydt et al., 2007; Venceslau et al., 2014), therefore only nine cases were detected that means this method is less sensitive to detect multiple infections compared to other methods. Remmerbach et al, reported that HPV detection was higher for GP5+/GP6+ oligonucleotides than for MY09/MY11 oligonucleotides which can be explained by the small size of the DNA fragments amplified by the GP-PCR system (Remmerbach et al., 2004). The sensitivity and specificity of the PCR method depend primarily on the choice of oligonucleotide primers to be used, the number of base pairs in the product amplified by PCR, the performance of the DNA polymerase used in the reaction, the amplified DNA-HPV type spectrum, and the ability to recognize different types of infection (Iftner and Villa, 2003).
Considering the age, although statistically not significant, higher HPV rates were observed among young women (31–40 years of age). It represents the highest incidence at marriage age and after starting sexual activity due to some cultural customs and religious beliefs such as not having illegitimate sex, increased marriage age, and lack of immunity to HPV in the absence of a national vaccination program (Oztürk et al., 2004; Muderris et al., 2019). The gradual decrease in HPV infection rates among middle-aged and older individuals can be explained that young women’s infections with HPV are transient and the immune system would eliminate the virus in most cases (Garbuglia et al., 2020; Ferrall et al., 2021).
Considering different morphologies, HPV DNA was identified in those with abnormal morphology. In Erbil-Iraq, 71% of cases with abnormal morphology were HPV DNA positive with the absence of this DNA among negative cases (Ismail et al., 2014), while in a previous local study (Duhok-Iraq), 46.2% of NILM cases and 53.8% of abnormal Pap cases were positive for HPV (Pity et al., 2019). Nevertheless, heterogeneous findings have been obtained among unremarkable and abnormal cases in different neighboring countries such as Saudi Arabia (28.6% and 53.1%) respectively and Kuwait (36.8% and 63.2%) respectively (Al-Awadhi et al., 2013; Al-Ahdal et al., 2014).
The highest identity (100.0%) of HPV16 detected in this study was observed with HPV16 (LC456183, MH937413) reported from Japan and Italy respectively. In addition, comparative nucleotide sequence analysis of the HPV18 L1 gene with retrieved HPV18 from Genbank showed variable sequence similarity ranging from 100.00% in Saudi Arabia to 99.05% in Iraq. This demonstrates that there was very little nucleotide heterogeneity, and therefore no amino acid heterogeneity, concerning HPV 16, 18, which is a very important result obtained from this study to align the circulating viruses with that included in the vaccine which is not introduced to Iraq yet.
In conclusions, the current work extends previous observations by providing baseline data on the circulation of HPV types among Duhok’s women, and their association with normal and abnormal cytology with age. Primer configurations used in HPV DNA amplification are important to determine the sensitivity and specificity of PCR-based assays. This study provides very important information and a practical approach to genetic diversity and phylogenetic analysis, which can be very helpful in linking epidemiological studies as well as the natural history and evolution of HPV in Iraq and deciding the type of vaccine that would be introduced in the future.
Author Contribution Statement
OAA: Table development, editing the manuscript and writing; GAA: conceptualization, editing the manuscript and writing review; PIS: supervision, visualization, and review, all authors have read and approved the final version.
Acknowledgements
Ethical Approval
Ethical approval to carry out the study was obtained from the Medical Ethics Committee of the Duhok General Director of Health on 20/July/2020- Reference number (20072020-3). This study was approved by the scientific committee of the college of Medicine/ University of Duhok as Ph.D. project.
Data Availability
The data appeared in this research can be obtained from the corresponding author of the article
Conflict of Interest
We declare no conflict of interest associated with this research and there has been no significant financial support for this project that could influence its outcome.
References
- Al-Ahdal MN, Al-Arnous WK, Bohol MF, et al. Human papillomaviruses in cervical specimens of women residing in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: a hospital-based study. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2014;8:320–5. doi: 10.3855/jidc.4220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Al-Awadhi R, Chehadeh W, Al-Jassar W, et al. Viral load of human papillomavirus in women with normal and abnormal cervical cytology in Kuwait. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2013;7:130–6. doi: 10.3855/jidc.2748. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:394–424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bruni L, Albero G, Serrano B, et al. ICO/IARC Information Centre on HPV and Cancer (HPV Information Centre). Human Papillomavirus and Related Diseases in the World. Summary Report. 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Chalabiani S, Khodadad Nazari M, Shabani M, et al. Retrospective Analysis of Prevalence of High-risk and Low-risk Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Genotypes in Iranian Women During 2013-2016. Asian Pac J Cancer Biol. 2017;2:85–90. [Google Scholar]
- Depuydt CE, Boulet GA, Horvath CA, et al. Comparison of MY09/11 consensus PCR and type-specific PCRs in the detection of oncogenic HPV types. J Cell Mol Med. 2007;11:881–91. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2007.00073.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ehteram H, Mousavian MS, Mazoochi T, Khamehchian T, Karimian M. Association of Some High-Risk Mucosal Types of Human Papillomavirus with Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma in an Iranian Population. Iran J Pathol. 2019;14:313. doi: 10.30699/ijp.2019.101544.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ferrall L, Lin KY, Roden R, Hung CF, Wu TC. Cervical Cancer Immunotherapy: Facts and Hopes. Clin Cancer Res. 2021;27:4953–73. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-2833. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Garbuglia AR, Lapa D, Sias C, Capobianchi MR, Del Porto P. The use of both therapeutic and prophylactic vaccines in the therapy of papillomavirus disease. Front Immunol. 2020;18:188. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ghosh S, Seth S, Paul J, et al. Evaluation of Pap smear, high-risk HPV DNA testing in detection of cervical neoplasia with colposcopy guided or conventional biopsy as a gold standard. Int J Healthcare Biomed Res. 2014;2:192–7. [Google Scholar]
- Giuliano AR, Lee JH, Fulp W, et al. Incidence and clearance of genital human papillomavirus infection in men (HIM): a cohort study. Lancet. 2011;377:932–40. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62342-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gravitt PE, Peyton CL, Alessi TQ, et al. Improved amplification of genital human papillomaviruses. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38:357–61. doi: 10.1128/jcm.38.1.357-361.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Iftner T, Vill LL. Chapter 12: Human papillomavirus technologies. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2003;31:80–8. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jncimonographs.a003487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ismail AT, Ahmed NY, AbdulHameed RA. Prevalence of HPV Immunostaining in Benign, Preneoplastic & Neoplastic Cervical Lesions of Kurdish Women in Erbil City/Kurdistan of Iraq. Am J Res Commun. 2014;2:67–74. [Google Scholar]
- Jalilian S, Izadi B, Madani S, Mohajeri P. The Prevalence and Genotype Distribution of Human Papillomavirus Types in the General Female Population in West of Iran. Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2017;10:e40855. [Google Scholar]
- Kamal M, Lameiras S, Deloger M, et al. Human papillomavirus (HPV) integration signature in Cervical Cancer: identification of MACROD2 gene as HPV hot spot integration site. Br J Cancer. 2021;124:777–85. doi: 10.1038/s41416-020-01153-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liao Y, Li Q. Profile of MeltPro® HPV test for human papillomavirus genotyping and cervical precancer screening. Exp Rev Mol Diagn. 2019;19:857–62. doi: 10.1080/14737159.2019.1662299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Muderris T, Afsar I, Yıldız A, Akpınar Varer C. HPV genotype distribution among women with normal and abnormal cervical cytology in Turkey. Rev Esp Quimioter. 2019;32:516–24. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mühr LSA, Eklund C, Dillner J. Towards quality and order in human papillomavirus research. Virology. 2018;5:74–6. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2018.04.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Oztürk S, Kaleli I, Kaleli B, Bir F. Servikal orneklerde insan papillomavirus DNA varliğinin hibrid yakalama yöntemiyle araştirilmasi [Investigation of human papillomavirus DNA in cervical specimens by hybrid capture assay] Mikrobiyol Bul. 2004;38:223–32. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pity IS, Abdo HM, Goreal AA. Human Papillomavirus Genotyping among Different Cervical Smears in Duhok/Iraq. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2019;20:2059–64. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2019.20.7.2059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Remmerbach TW, Brinckmann UG, Hemprich A, et al. PCR detection of human papillomavirus of the mucosa: comparison between MY09/11 and GP5+/6+ primer sets. J Clin Virol. 2004;30:302–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2003.12.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sopian M, Tuan Din S, Hussin H. Obstacles to Implementing the HPV Vaccine: Is it Worth Pursuing or Not? Asian Pac J Cancer Care. 2019;4:165–9. [Google Scholar]
- Venkatas J, Singh M. Cervical cancer: a meta-analysis, therapy, and future of nanomedicine. Ecancermedicalscience. 2020;14:1111. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2020.1111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Venceslau E, Bezerra M, Lopes A, et al. HPV detection using primers MY09/MY11 and GP5+/GP6+ in patients with cytologic and/or colposcopic changes. J Bras Patol Med Lab. 2014:50. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The data appeared in this research can be obtained from the corresponding author of the article



