Skip to main content
Case Reports in Oncology logoLink to Case Reports in Oncology
. 2023 Jul 10;16(1):510–516. doi: 10.1159/000530965

Complete Response to Immunotherapy in a Patient with MUTYH-Associated Polyposis and Gastric Cancer: A Case Report

Maria Cecilia Mathias-Machado a,, Renata D Peixoto a, Patricia Ashton-Prolla b, Leonard Medeiros Da Silva a,c, Rodrigo Dienstmann a,c
PMCID: PMC10352934  PMID: 37469678

Abstract

MUTYH-associated polyposis syndrome is an uncommon, autosomal recessive colorectal polyposis syndrome caused by biallelic inactivation of MUTYH. Most patients present with multiple colorectal polyps. However, other primary tumor sites have been described as less frequent. In this report, we describe the case of a young patient with a germline biallelic pathogenic MUTYH mutation with three different primary tumors. We focused on a metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma that presented with complete bowel obstruction secondary to extensive peritoneal carcinomatosis and achieved complete response upon treatment with immunotherapy. The patient’s tumor presented with a high tumor mutational burden and a 100% combined positive score, which certainly contributed to the complete response to immunotherapy. To date, no studies have described the association of MUTYH-related tumors with high PD-L1 expression, but we hypothesized that it may be linked to the increased antigenicity of these cancers.

Keywords: Gastric cancer, MUTYH, Immunotherapy, Case report

Introduction

MUTYH-associated polyposis (MAP) is an autosomal recessive colorectal polyposis syndrome caused by biallelic inactivation of MUTYH. The main clinical manifestations of affected patients are colorectal polyposis and colorectal cancer (CRC). In patients with multiple colorectal adenomas and no identifiable APC mutations, biallelic MUTYH inactivation can be found in 7–13% of those with >100 adenomas and 14–40% of those with 10–99 adenomas [14]. Usually, MAP patients develop 10–100 colorectal polyps by the fifth or sixth decade [5, 6] and have an increased lifetime risk for CRC (43%–63% at age 60 years, which may reach 80%–90% in the absence of proper surveillance) [7, 8]. Approximately 60% of MAP patients are diagnosed with CRC at presentation [713]. In a few MAP patients, CRC may develop in the absence of colorectal polyposis.

Germline monoallelic MUTYH alterations are common in the general population, reaching 1%–2% prevalence in northern European, Australian, and US populations. Biallelic alterations are much less common and account for <1% of individuals with the diagnosis of CRC [14, 15] but increases to 2% in young-onset CRC patients and to 10%–25% in CRC patients whose tumors harbor somatic KRAS c.34G>T (G12C) [13]. This association is linked to a distinct mutational signature in MUTYH-associated tumors, with prominent G:C>T:A transversions in NpCpA or NpCpT contexts [16].

Extracolonic manifestations of MAP are less frequently described. However, patients appear to have an increased risk of gastric and duodenal polyps [17, 18]. In one study that included 276 patients with MAP from 181 families, gastric and duodenal polyps were noted in 11 and 17 percent of patients, respectively. Higher risk for gastric cancer (GC) has been observed, although the trend was not significant [17]. In another cohort of 226 carriers of MUTYH germline alterations, increased risk for GC was identified only in monoallelic but not in biallelic mutation carriers [11]. Interestingly, patients with GC exhibiting low MUTYH expression seem to have a poor outcome when compared to those expressing high levels of MUTYH [19]. Furthermore, in a large European multicenter cohort of MAP patients, the incidence of extraintestinal malignancies was almost twice that observed in the general population (standardized incidence ratio 1.9; 95% CI: 1.4–2.5) with an overall lifetime risk of developing cancer of 38%. The estimated lifetime risk of cancers of the duodenum, ovaries, bladder, and skin was significantly higher as compared with the general population (4, 10, 6, and 17%, respectively) [17], and there is some evidence of an increased risk for breast and endometrial cancer. In addition, MAP patients may also present with thyroid nodules and benign adrenal lesions [20, 21], osteomas, congenital hypertrophy of the retinal pigment epithelium, dental cysts, desmoid tumors, sebaceous hyperplasia, and Muir-Torre phenotype with sebaceous gland tumors [22]. Here, we report a case (with the consent of the patient) of a young female patient with germline biallelic pathogenic MUTYH variants and diagnosis of advanced GC, who achieved complete clinical response to anti-PD1 therapy.

Case Report

Here, we report the case of a 21-year-old female patient with past medical history of depression and hypothyroidism with no family history of cancer. In July 2014, the patients were submitted to total colectomy due to a diagnosis of stage 3 CRC. During adjuvant oxaliplatin-based therapy for 6 months, the patient presented with a pulmonary nodule finding on routine thoracic imaging, which was biopsied, confirming an early-stage primary lung adenocarcinoma. The lung cancer was treated with surgical resection and adjuvant cisplatin and pemetrexed doublet. At that time, the patient declined genetic counseling and germline testing.

In October 2020, the patient presented with an intestinal sub-occlusion and was submitted to a segmental enterectomy due to an intestinal intussusception. The pathology report was consistent with an intramucosal adenocarcinoma of a hamartomatous dysplastic lesion. Two months later, the patient presented with yet another intestinal sub-occlusion. She underwent an upper endoscopy with a biopsy finding of a poorly cohesive gastric adenocarcinoma and strong immune infiltration, as shown in Figure 1. She was subsequently submitted to an exploratory laparoscopy with findings consistent with diffuse peritoneal involvement precluding surgical resection. Pathology reported a poorly cohesive, poorly differentiated carcinoma with a preserved expression of mismatch repair proteins on immunohistochemistry, as shown in Figure 2. Immunohistochemistry was performed on Autostainer Link 48 (Dako) using PT-Link Dako for antigenic retrieval and EnVision FLEX for visualization. Antibody (clones) included were MLH1 (ES05), PMS2 (EP51), MSH2 (FE11), MSH6 (EP49). Also, PD-L1 staining (DAKO 22C3 clone) showed combined positive score and tumor proportion score of 100% and 60%, respectively. Due to the intestinal sub-occlusion, the patient remained hospitalized with total parental nutrition due to incapacity of any oral ingestion.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Poorly cohesive adenocarcinoma (yellow arrows) admixed with abundant tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (red arrows) in subperitoneal connective tissue (scale 50 μm).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Preserved expression of mismatch repair proteins (MLH1, PMS2, MSH2, MSH6) on immunohistochemistry. MHL1 (a); PMS2 (b); MSH2 (c), and MSH6 (d) (scale 50 μm).

Given the strong immune infiltration with high PD-L1 expression and considering patient's denial for any cytotoxic chemotherapy, the medical team decided to offer first-line therapy with pembrolizumab. A few weeks after initiating treatment in January 2021, the sub-occlusion was resolved, and parenteral nutrition was discontinued. The patient achieved complete clinical response in January 2023 and remains in complete remission until the present day (more than 1 year and 6 months), as shown in Figure 3.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Comparison of the patients’ imaging studies (computerized topographies) from December 2020 prior to immunotherapy and January 2023 with immunotherapy (created with BioRender.com).

To further characterize this spectacular response, the patient’s gastric tumor samples were submitted to next-generation sequencing (NGS) with a broad panel of 180 genes (customized ArcherDX VariantPlex and FusionPlex, Oncoclínicas Precision Medicine) and revealed somatic mutations in KRAS (G12C), BRAF (G464V), PIK3CA (Q546K), SMAD4 (S474*), and MAP2K1 (K57 N). Based on NGS, tumor was classified as microsatellite stable (MSS) but had moderate to high mutational tumor burden (26.5 mutations per Mb). We also referred the patient to genetic counseling, and a germline NGS panel detected biallelic pathogenic MUTYH mutation (Y179C).

Discussion

The case reported here demonstrates for the first-time major response to immunotherapy in advanced GC of a patient harboring germline biallelic mutation in MUTYH. The MUTYH gene encodes for DNA glycosylase, a key enzyme in DNA base excision repair (BER) [23]. BER is responsible for correcting DNA alterations arising spontaneously from normal metabolic processes, lesions induced by chemical carcinogens, and abasic sites. MUTYH loss of function alterations leads to defective BER and an increased incidence of G:C to T:A transversions throughout the genome. The most commonly described germline loss of function MUTYH variants are Y179C (rs34612342) and G396D (rs36053993), which account for 75% of the reported mutations and are most prevalent in Caucasians [2426].

MAP increases individual risks not only of CRC but also of extracolonic tumors such as ovarian, duodenal, and bladder cancers, which are usually diagnosed at younger ages as their sporadic counterparts [13]. The association of biallelic loss of function germline MUTYH alterations with GC remains still controversial. Although promising results of immunotherapy in MAP patients with CRC have been published, little is known about the response in those with non-CRC tumors.

MUTYH-associated tumors are characterized by a moderate mutator phenotype when compared to proficient mismatch repair CRC, with an average of 5.3 mutations per Mb. Despite being MSS, the higher mutation burden is associated with increased lymphocyte infiltration and frequent loss of HLA I class expression, suggestive of immune-driven selective pressure, resembling cancers with high-level microsatellite instability (MSI-H) [2729]. High mutation burden and lymphocyte infiltration are known predictive markers for tumor response to immune checkpoint inhibitors, as seen in MSI-H CRC [30, 31]. Therefore, it has been hypothesized that tumors harboring MUTYH gene inactivation could be sensitive to immunotherapy, and 1 case report of patient with CRC harboring two mutations in MUTYH documented pronounced response to nivolumab therapy [29].

The mechanism to explain increased immunogenicity of high tumor mutational burden (TMB) cancers is believed to be related to the accumulation of so-called mutation-associated neoantigens, mutant proteins resulting from nonsynonymous mutations, which are strongly immunogenic. As previously stated, MUTYH-associated CRCs, although MSS, show a distinct mutational signature, with frequent G:C>T transversions and increased TMB combined with prominent lymphocyte infiltration [27, 32] which could render these tumors sensitive to therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors [33, 34]. Indeed, our patient’s poorly cohesive gastric tumor had moderate to high TMB and abundant lymphocyte infiltration. So far, no studies have described the association of MUTYH-related tumors with high PD-L1 expression, but we hypothesized that it may be linked to the increased antigenicity of these cancers, as in our case.

Interestingly, MAP patients with CRC may present a KRAS G12C transversion in up to 60% of the cases [27, 35, 36], which is most likely due to the intrinsic BER defect resulting in an accumulation of DNA transversions throughout the genome but especially in APC and KRAS [37]. Therefore, considering the low prevalence of KRAS G12C mutations in unselected CRC population (<4%) [38], it seems reasonable to consider screening these cases for germline MUTYH alterations. The same may be true for GC, as in our patient’s case, given the extreme rarity of this genomic alteration in general (<1%) [39].

The present case contributes to the description of the MAP-associated phenotype with description of a very young patient diagnosed with three primary tumors. It contributes to the growing evidence for an association of MAP with GC and demonstrates that the impressive response to immunotherapy seen in patients with MUTYH-associated CRCs may also be achieved in other primaries, such as GCs. Due to the rarity of MUTYH cancers and the strong association with KRAS G12C somatic mutations, case reports like the one described here will increase awareness of the medical community on emerging genomic biomarkers of immunotherapy response beyond MSI and high TMB. The CARE Checklist has been completed by the authors for this case report, attached as online supplementary material (for all online suppl. material, see https://doi.org/10.1159/000530965).

Statement of Ethics

This retrospective review of patient data did not require ethical approval in accordance with local/national guidelines. The patient described in the case report has given consent to publish this case, and written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of the details of their medical case and any accompanying images.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Funding Sources

No funding was used for this manuscript.

Author Contributions

Maria Cecilia Mathias-Machado, Renata D. Peixoto, Patricia Ashton-Prolla, Leonard Medeiros Da Silva, and Rodrigo Dienstmann contributed to conception, research, and manuscript writing.

Funding Statement

No funding was used for this manuscript.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are openly available in PubMed at https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.

Supplementary Material

References

  • 1. Jones S, Emmerson P, Maynard J, Best JM, Jordan S, Williams GT, et al. Biallelic germline mutations in MYH predispose to multiple colorectal adenoma and somatic G:C-->T:A mutations. Hum Mol Genet. 2002 Nov 1;11(23):2961–7. 10.1093/hmg/11.23.2961. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Venesio T, Molatore S, Cattaneo F, Arrigoni A, Risio M, Ranzani GN. High frequency of MYH gene mutations in a subset of patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. Gastroenterology. 2004 Jun;126(7):1681–5. 10.1053/j.gastro.2004.02.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Knopperts AP, Nielsen M, Niessen RC, Tops CM, Jorritsma B, Varkevisser J, et al. Contribution of bi-allelic germline MUTYH mutations to early-onset and familial colorectal cancer and to low number of adenomatous polyps: case-series and literature review. Fam Cancer. 2013 Mar;12(1):43–50. 10.1007/s10689-012-9570-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Jo WS, Bandipalliam P, Shannon KM, Niendorf KB, Chan-Smutko G, Hur C, et al. Correlation of polyp number and family history of colon cancer with germline MYH mutations. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005 Oct;3(10):1022–8. 10.1016/s1542-3565(05)00411-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Sieber OM, Lipton L, Crabtree M, Heinimann K, Fidalgo P, Phillips RKS, et al. Multiple colorectal adenomas, classic adenomatous polyposis, and germ-line mutations in MYH. N Engl J Med. 2003 Feb 27;348(9):791–9. 10.1056/nejmoa025283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Grover S, Kastrinos F, Steyerberg EW, Cook EF, Dewanwala A, Burbidge LA, et al. Prevalence and phenotypes of APC and MUTYH mutations in patients with multiple colorectal adenomas. JAMA. 2012 Aug 1;308(5):485–92. 10.1001/jama.2012.8780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Nielsen M, Joerink-van de Beld MC, Jones N, Vogt S, Tops CM, Vasen HFA, et al. Analysis of MUTYH genotypes and colorectal phenotypes in patients with MUTYH-associated polyposis. Gastroenterology. 2009 Feb;136(2):471–6. 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.10.056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Win AK, Dowty JG, Cleary SP, Kim H, Buchanan DD, Young JP, et al. Risk of colorectal cancer for carriers of mutations in MUTYH, with and without a family history of cancer. Gastroenterology. 2014 May;146(5):1208–11. e1-5. 10.1053/j.gastro.2014.01.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Theodoratou E, Campbell H, Tenesa A, Houlston R, Webb E, Lubbe S, et al. A large-scale meta-analysis to refine colorectal cancer risk estimates associated with MUTYH variants. Br J Cancer. 2010 Dec 7;103(12):1875–84. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Jones N, Vogt S, Nielsen M, Christian D, Wark PA, Eccles D, et al. Increased colorectal cancer incidence in obligate carriers of heterozygous mutations in MUTYH. Gastroenterology. 2009 Aug;137(2):489–94; e1; quiz 725–6. 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.04.047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Win AK, Cleary SP, Dowty JG, Baron JA, Young JP, Buchanan DD, et al. Cancer risks for monoallelic MUTYH mutation carriers with a family history of colorectal cancer. Int J Cancer. 2011 Nov 1;129(9):2256–62. 10.1002/ijc.25870. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Jenkins MA, Croitoru ME, Monga N, Cleary SP, Cotterchio M, Hopper JL, et al. Risk of colorectal cancer in monoallelic and biallelic carriers of MYH mutations: a population-based case-family study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006 Feb;15(2):312–4. 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0793. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Lubbe SJ, Di Bernardo MC, Chandler IP, Houlston RS. Clinical implications of the colorectal cancer risk associated with MUTYH mutation. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Aug 20;27(24):3975–80. 10.1200/JCO.2008.21.6853. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Croitoru ME, Cleary SP, Di Nicola N, Manno M, Selander T, Aronson M, et al. Association between biallelic and monoallelic germline MYH gene mutations and colorectal cancer risk. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004 Nov 3;96(21):1631–4. 10.1093/jnci/djh288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Cleary SP, Cotterchio M, Jenkins MA, Kim H, Bristow R, Green R, et al. Germline MutY human homologue mutations and colorectal cancer: a multisite case-control study. Gastroenterology. 2009 Apr;136(4):1251–60. 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.12.050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Pilati C, Shinde J, Alexandrov LB, Assié G, André T, Hélias-Rodzewicz Z, et al. Mutational signature analysis identifies MUTYH deficiency in colorectal cancers and adrenocortical carcinomas. J Pathol. 2017 May;242(1):10–5. 10.1002/path.4880. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Vogt S, Jones N, Christian D, Engel C, Nielsen M, Kaufmann A, et al. Expanded extracolonic tumor spectrum in MUTYH-associated polyposis. Gastroenterology. 2009 Dec;137(6):1976–85. e1-10. 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.08.052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Walton SJ, Kallenberg FGJ, Clark SK, Dekker E, Latchford A. Frequency and features of duodenal adenomas in patients with MUTYH-associated polyposis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Jul;14(7):986–92. 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.02.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Shinmura K, Goto M, Suzuki M, Tao H, Yamada H, Igarashi H, et al. Reduced expression of MUTYH with suppressive activity against mutations caused by 8-hydroxyguanine is a novel predictor of a poor prognosis in human gastric cancer. J Pathol. 2011 Nov;225(3):414–23. 10.1002/path.2953. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Sutcliffe EG, Bartenbaker Thompson A, Stettner AR, Marshall ML, Roberts ME, Susswein LR, et al. Multi-gene panel testing confirms phenotypic variability in MUTYH-Associated Polyposis. Fam Cancer. 2019 Apr;18(2):203–9. 10.1007/s10689-018-00116-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Kallenberg FGJ, Bastiaansen BAJ, Nio CY, Soeters MR, Boermeester MA, Aalfs CM, et al. Adrenal lesions in patients with (attenuated) familial adenomatous polyposis and MUTYH-associated polyposis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2017 Oct;60(10):1057–64. 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Aretz S, Uhlhaas S, Goergens H, Siberg K, Vogel M, Pagenstecher C, et al. MUTYH-associated polyposis: 70 of 71 patients with biallelic mutations present with an attenuated or atypical phenotype. Int J Cancer. 2006 Aug 15;119(4):807–14. 10.1002/ijc.21905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Banda DM, Nuñez NN, Burnside MA, Bradshaw KM, David SS. Repair of 8-oxoG:A mismatches by the MUTYH glycosylase: mechanism, metals and medicine. Free Radic Biol Med. 2017 Jun;107:202–15. 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2017.01.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Curia MC, Catalano T, Aceto GM. MUTYH: not just polyposis. World J Clin Oncol. 2020 Jul 24;11(7):428–49. 10.5306/wjco.v11.i7.428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Russell AM, Zhang J, Luz J, Hutter P, Chappuis PO, Berthod CR, et al. Prevalence of MYH germline mutations in Swiss APC mutation-negative polyposis patients. Int J Cancer. 2006 Apr 15;118(8):1937–40. 10.1002/ijc.21470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Lorca V, Garre P. Current status of the genetic susceptibility in attenuated adenomatous polyposis. World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2019 Dec 15;11(12):1101–14. 10.4251/wjgo.v11.i12.1101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Nielsen M, de Miranda NFCC, van Puijenbroek M, Jordanova ES, Middeldorp A, van Wezel T, et al. Colorectal carcinomas in MUTYH-associated polyposis display histopathological similarities to microsatellite unstable carcinomas. BMC Cancer. 2009 Jun 15;9:184. 10.1186/1471-2407-9-184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Viel A, Bruselles A, Meccia E, Fornasarig M, Quaia M, Canzonieri V, et al. A specific mutational signature associated with DNA 8-oxoguanine persistence in MUTYH-defective colorectal cancer. EBioMedicine. 2017 Jun;20:39–49. 10.1016/j.ebiom.2017.04.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Volkov NM, Yanus GA, Ivantsov AO, Moiseenko FV, Matorina OG, Bizin IV, et al. Efficacy of immune checkpoint blockade in MUTYH-associated hereditary colorectal cancer. Invest New Drugs. 2020 Jun;38(3):894–8. 10.1007/s10637-019-00842-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Overman MJ, McDermott R, Leach JL, Lonardi S, Lenz HJ, Morse MA, et al. Nivolumab in patients with metastatic DNA mismatch repair-deficient or microsatellite instability-high colorectal cancer (CheckMate 142): an open-label, multicentre, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2017 Sep;18(9):1182–91. 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30422-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Le DT, Durham JN, Smith KN, Wang H, Bartlett BR, Aulakh LK, et al. Mismatch repair deficiency predicts response of solid tumors to PD-1 blockade. Science. 2017 Jul 28;357(6349):409–13. 10.1126/science.aan6733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Nielsen M, van Steenbergen LN, Jones N, Vogt S, Vasen HFA, Morreau H, et al. Survival of MUTYH-associated polyposis patients with colorectal cancer and matched control colorectal cancer patients. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010 Nov 17;102(22):1724–30. 10.1093/jnci/djq370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Bever KM, Le DT. DNA repair defects and implications for immunotherapy. J Clin Invest. 2018 Oct 1;128(10):4236–42. 10.1172/JCI122010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Rospo G, Lorenzato A, Amirouchene-Angelozzi N, Magrì A, Cancelliere C, Corti G, et al. Evolving neoantigen profiles in colorectal cancers with DNA repair defects. Genome Med. 2019 Jun 28;11(1):42. 10.1186/s13073-019-0654-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Lipton L, Halford SE, Johnson V, Novelli MR, Jones A, Cummings C, et al. Carcinogenesis in MYH-associated polyposis follows a distinct genetic pathway. Cancer Res. 2003 Nov 15;63(22):7595–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Jones S, Lambert S, Williams GT, Best JM, Sampson JR, Cheadle JP. Increased frequency of the k-ras G12C mutation in MYH polyposis colorectal adenomas. Br J Cancer. 2004 Apr 19;90(8):1591–3. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601747. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Buisine MP, Cattan S, Wacrenier A, Leclerc J, Lejeune S. Identification of a patient with atypical MUTYH-associated polyposis through detection of the KRAS c.34G>T mutation in liver metastasis. J Clin Oncol. 2013 Mar 20;31(9):e125–127. 10.1200/JCO.2012.44.7391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Neumann J, Zeindl-Eberhart E, Kirchner T, Jung A. Frequency and type of KRAS mutations in routine diagnostic analysis of metastatic colorectal cancer. Pathol Res Pract. 2009 Dec;205(12):858–62. 10.1016/j.prp.2009.07.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Aimé A, Coulet F, Lefevre JH, Colas C, Cervera P, Flejou JF, et al. Somatic c.34G>T KRAS mutation: a new prescreening test for MUTYH-associated polyposis? Cancer Genet. 2015 Jul;208(7–8):390–5. 10.1016/j.cancergen.2015.04.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are openly available in PubMed at https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.


Articles from Case Reports in Oncology are provided here courtesy of Karger Publishers

RESOURCES