ABSTRACT
Rhodoplanes is a small genus of anoxygenic purple nonsulfur bacteria belonging to the family Nitrobacteraceae in the class Alphaproteobacteria. We sequenced the genomes of one mesophilic and two thermotolerant strains, and whole-genome-based comparisons confirmed suspected close similarities and synonyms between different species in the genus.
ANNOUNCEMENT
The phototrophic genus Rhodoplanes contains 10 named species (1); however, until now, only 3 had been sequenced: Rhodoplanes piscinae, R. roseus, and R. elegans (2). We have now sequenced the genomes of Rhodoplanes serenus, R. tepidamans, and “Rhodoplanes cryptolactis.” Earlier studies proposed that the species R. cryptolactis be included in the new species R. tepidamans, based on the loss of R. cryptolactis from the ATCC collection (3). Whole-genome sequencing was performed to determine the genomic differences between the known strains of Rhodoplanes and to further refine the genus.
Rhodoplanes serenus DSM 18633 was originally isolated from pond water at the University of Tokyo, Japan (4), while R. tepidamans DSM 9987 and R. cryptolactis are thermotolerant species isolated from a soil sample near a hot spring in Wyoming (5). Genomic DNA (gDNA) of R. serenus and R. tepidamans was obtained from the DSMZ culture collection, while frozen cultures of R. cryptolactis TEM were obtained from T. E. Meyer, who received a direct transfer from the original isolation by R. Stadtwald-Demchick, F. R. Turner, and H. Gest (5). The cultures were grown in DSMZ medium 27, supplemented with 20 μg/L vitamin B21, and DNA was extracted using the GeneJET genomic DNA isolation kit (Thermo Scientific). DNA analysis showed ratios of absorption at 260/280 nm of 1.96 for R. serenus, 1.85 for R. tepidamans, and 2.0 for R. cryptolactis.
Sequencing libraries were prepared using the Illumina Nextera DNA Flex library prep kit and sequenced using an Illumina MiniSeq instrument, using 500 μL of a 1.8 pM library. Paired-end (2 × 150-bp) sequencing generated 3,015,458 reads and 227 Mbp for R. serenus, 1,239,460 reads and 187.2 Mbp for R. tepidamans, and 3,081,022 reads and 465.2 Mbp for R. cryptolactis. Quality control of the reads was performed using FastQC version 1.0.0 within BaseSpace (Illumina), using a k-mer size of 5 and contamination filtering. We assembled the genome de novo through BV-BRC (6) using Unicycler (7). A comparison of the features of these new genomes to the other Rhodoplanes genomes is provided in Table 1. The genomes were annotated using the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (8). The resulting coding sequences and tRNAs are also available in Table 1. Default parameters were used for all software applications unless otherwise noted.
TABLE 1.
Overview of the features of all the Rhodoplanes genome sequences
| Species | Genome size (bp) | GC content (%) | No. of contigsa | N50 (bp) | Coverage (×) | No. of CDSsb | No. of tRNAs | Reference | GenBank accession no. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R. tepidamans DSM 9987 | 6,800,548 | 71.1 | 132 | 94,445 | 28 | 6,095 | 48 | This study | JAQQLI000000000 |
| R. cryptolactis TEM | 6,781,861 | 71 | 238 | 50,670 | 69 | 6,150 | 48 | This study | JAQQSA000000000 |
| R. roseus DSM 5909 | 6,879,536 | 69.4 | 1,040 | 19,390 | 308 | 6,585 | 48 | 9 | NPEX00000000 |
| R. elegans DSM 11907 | 6,538,588 | 69.5 | 320 | 32,496 | 33 | 6,093 | 48 | 2 | NHSK00000000 |
| R. serenus DSM 18633 | 5,501,108 | 70.3 | 51 | 262,047 | 41 | 4,965 | 49 | This study | WNKV00000000 |
| R. piscinae DSM 19946 | 5,370,996 | 70.2 | 880 | 15,387 | 385 | 5,201 | 46 | 10 | NPEW00000000 |
Number of contigs >300 bp.
CDSs, coding DNA sequences.
A JSpecies comparison (11) of the average nucleotide identity (ANIb) showed that the 3 new genomes all have ≤86% ANI with the earlier sequenced Rhodoplanes genomes, except for R. serenus and R. piscinae, which share 97.4% ANI. The latter is above the proposed 95% cutoff for genome definition of a species (11). R. tepidamans and R. cryptolactis are about equidistant to all the Rhodoplanes species; however, they share 99.9% ANI, which indicates that they belong to the same species. Whole-genome-based phylogenetic analysis was performed using RAxML (12, 13) version 8.2.11 with all the Rhodoplanes genomes (Fig. 1). Protein sequences were aligned using MUSCLE (14), and the nucleotide coding gene sequences were aligned using the Codon_align function of Biopython (15). A concatenated alignment of all proteins and nucleotides was written to a partition file for RAxML. Consistent with the ANI analysis, this analysis also closely grouped R. serenus with R. piscinae and R. tepidamans with R. cryptolactis. This finding agrees with the suggestion that R. piscinae should be a later synonym of R. serenus (16) and confirms that R. tepidamans and R. cryptolactis belong to the same species. The addition of these new Rhodoplanes genomes has substantially strengthened the phylogenetic tree of this genus.
FIG 1.
Whole-genome-based phylogenetic tree of all sequenced Rhodoplanes species. The phylogenetic tree was generated using the codon tree method within BV-BRC (6), which used PGfams as homology groups; 875 PGfams were found among these selected genomes using the CodonTree analysis, and the aligned proteins and coding DNA from single-copy genes were used for RAxML analysis (12, 13). One hundred rounds of the rapid bootstrapping option in RAxML were used to generate the support values for the phylogenetic tree. The branch length tree scale is defined as the mean number of substitutions per site, which is an average across both nucleotide and amino acid changes. New genomes are in red. The Rhodopseudomonas sp. strain ATH 2.1.18 genome was used as an outgroup (17). iTOL was used for the tree visualization (18).
Data availability.
These whole-genome shotgun projects have been deposited at DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under the accession numbers WNKV00000000 for R. serenus, JAQQLI000000000 for R. tepidamans, and JAQQSA000000000 for R. cryptolactis. The versions described in this paper are versions WNKV01000000, JAQQLI010000000, and JAQQSA010000000, respectively. The raw sequencing reads have been submitted to the SRA under the accession numbers SRR23308057 for R. serenus, SRR23308056 for R. tepidamans, and SRR23308055 for R. cryptolactis.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This work was sponsored by the Wilson Enhancement Fund for Applied Research in Science at Bellevue University.
Contributor Information
John A. Kyndt, Email: jkyndt@bellevue.edu.
Julia A. Maresca, University of Delaware College of Engineering
REFERENCES
- 1.Hiraishi A, Ueda Y. 1994. Rhodoplanes gen. nov., a new genus of phototrophic bacteria including Rhodopseudomonas rosea as Rhodoplanes roseus comb. nov. and Rhodoplanes elegans sp. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol 44:665–673. doi: 10.1099/00207713-44-4-665. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Imhoff JF, Rahn T, Künzel S, Keller A, Neulinger SC. 2020. Osmotic adaptation and compatible solute biosynthesis of phototrophic bacteria as revealed from genome analyses. Microorganisms 9:46. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9010046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hiraishi A, Okamura K. 2017. Proposal of Rhodoplanes tepidamans sp. nov. to accommodate the thermotolerant phototrophic bacterium previously referred to as “Rhodoplanes (Rhodopseudomonas) cryptolactis.” Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 67:1540–1545. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.001752. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Okamura K, Kanbe T, Hiraishi A. 2009. Rhodoplanes serenus sp. nov., a purple non-sulfur bacterium isolated from pond water. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 59:531–535. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.000174-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Stadtwald-Demchick R, Turner FR, Gest H. 1990. Rhodopseudomonas cryptolactis sp. nov., a new thermotolerant species of budding phototrophic purple bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Lett 71:117–121. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1990.tb03808.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Wattam AR, Davis JJ, Assaf R, Boisvert S, Brettin T, Bun C, Conrad N, Dietrich EM, Disz T, Gabbard JL, Gerdes S, Henry CS, Kenyon RW, Machi D, Mao C, Nordberg EK, Olsen GJ, Murphy-Olson DE, Olson R, Overbeek R, Parrello B, Pusch GD, Shukla M, Vonstein V, Warren A, Xia F, Yoo H, Stevens RL. 2017. Improvements to PATRIC, the all-bacterial Bioinformatics Database and Analysis Resource Center. Nucleic Acids Res 45:D535–D542. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw1017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Wick RR, Judd LM, Gorrie CL, Holt KE. 2017. Unicycler: resolving bacterial genome assemblies from short and long sequencing reads. PLoS Comput Biol 13:e1005595. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Tatusova T, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Nawrocki EP, Zaslavsky L, Lomsadze A, Pruitt KD, Borodovsky M, Ostell J. 2016. NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 44:6614–6624. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lasarre B, Mckinlay JB. 2018. Draft genome sequences of select purple nonsulfur bacteria: Rhodoplanes roseus strain DSM 5909. GenBank https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/NPEX00000000.1 (accession no. NPEX00000000).
- 10.Lasarre B, Mckinlay JB. 2018. Draft genome sequences of select purple nonsulfur bacteria: Rhodoplanes piscinae strain DSM 19946. GenBank https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/NPEW00000000.1 (accession no. NPEW00000000).
- 11.Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R, Glöckner FO, Peplies J. 2016. JSpeciesWS: a Web server for prokaryotic species circumscription based on pairwise genome comparison. Bioinformatics 32:929–931. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Stamatakis A, Hoover P, Rougemont JJS. 2008. A rapid bootstrap algorithm for the RAxML Web servers. Syst Biol 57:758–771. doi: 10.1080/10635150802429642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Stamatakis AJB. 2014. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 30:1312–1313. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Edgar RCJN. 2004. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res 32:1792–1797. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Cock PJ, Antao T, Chang JT, Chapman BA, Cox CJ, Dalke A, Friedberg I, Hamelryck T, Kauff F, Wilczynski B, de Hoon MJ. 2009. Biopython: freely available Python tools for computational molecular biology and bioinformatics. Bioinformatics 25:1422–1423. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Volpiano CG, Sant'Anna FH, Ambrosini A, de São José JFB, Beneduzi A, Whitman WB, de Souza EM, Lisboa BB, Vargas LK, Passaglia LMP. 2021. Genomic metrics applied to Rhizobiales (Hyphomicrobiales): species reclassification, identification of unauthentic genomes and false type strains. Front Microbiol 12:614957. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.614957. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Imhoff JF, Meyer TE, Kyndt J. 2020. Genomic and genetic sequence information of strains assigned to the genus Rhodopseudomonas reveal the great heterogeneity of the group and identify strain Rhodopseudomonas palustris DSM 123T as the authentic type strain of this species. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 70:3932–3938. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.004077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Letunic I, Bork P. 2019. Interactive Tree of Life (iTOL) v4: recent updates and new developments. Nucleic Acids Res 47:W256–W259. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
These whole-genome shotgun projects have been deposited at DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under the accession numbers WNKV00000000 for R. serenus, JAQQLI000000000 for R. tepidamans, and JAQQSA000000000 for R. cryptolactis. The versions described in this paper are versions WNKV01000000, JAQQLI010000000, and JAQQSA010000000, respectively. The raw sequencing reads have been submitted to the SRA under the accession numbers SRR23308057 for R. serenus, SRR23308056 for R. tepidamans, and SRR23308055 for R. cryptolactis.

