Skip to main content
Microbiology Resource Announcements logoLink to Microbiology Resource Announcements
. 2023 Jun 22;12(7):e00067-23. doi: 10.1128/mra.00067-23

Complete Genome Sequence of Sphingomonas sp. Strain NIBR02145

Hyun Young Kim a,b, Jin Young Park c, Jin Nam Kim d, Jaewoong Yu d,, Bongsang Kim d,e,f,
Editor: J Cameron Thrashg
PMCID: PMC10353387  PMID: 37347182

ABSTRACT

Sphingomonas sp. strain NIBR02145 is a putative chemoheterotrophic strain that was isolated from soil in Wando-gun, Republic of Korea. The NIBR02145 genome was sequenced with PacBio next-generation sequencing technology. The 5,010,245-bp circular genome has a GC content of 66.79% and harbors 4,561 coding sequences, 6 rRNAs, and 52 tRNAs.

ANNOUNCEMENT

The genus Sphingomonas was first proposed in 1990 by Yabuuchi et al. (1). The strains of the genus are Gram-negative, strictly aerobic, chemoheterotrophic bacteria (2, 3). Sphingomonas strains are found in a variety of habitats, including soil, water, plant roots, and even extreme environments (46). They are attracting great attention due to their properties that can be applied to biotechnology, such as biosynthetic abilities (7, 8) and biodegrading abilities (9). Therefore, whole-genome-level study of Sphingomonas strains is expected to make significant contributions not only to the possibility of industrial applications but also to ecological research. In addition, although there are 3,960 Sphingomonas taxonomies in NCBI, only 139 of them have genome data, which limits comparative and phylogenetic analyses of Sphingomonas strains.

A sample of topsoil was obtained at a depth of <10 cm in Wando-gun, Jeollanam-do, Republic of Korea (34°18′52.4″N, 126°42′50.5″E). Strain NIBR02145 was cultured in Reasoner’s 2A (R2A) medium (Merck, Millipore, Germany) and incubated at 25°C for 3 days, and cells from a single colony were collected in a 5-mL Eppendorf tube for DNA extraction. Genomic DNA was extracted using a MagCore genomic DNA bacterial kit (RBC Bioscience, Taiwan), and a Covaris g-TUBE device was used to shear the DNA according to the instructions of the manufacturer. DNA was sheared into fragments of >15 kb and purified using 0.45× AMPure XP magnetic beads (Beckman Coulter, USA). Library construction was performed using the Pacific Biosciences (PacBio) SMRTbell library preparation kit v1.0 (PacBio). DNA damage repair and end repair were performed using the SMRTbell damage repair kit (PacBio), and then reagents from the SMRTbell enzyme cleanup kit (PacBio) were added to the library. The library was placed in 0.75% BluePippin and electrophoresed to obtain fragments of ≥15 kb, and then the library was sequenced on the PacBio RS II platform.

The number of sequenced raw reads was 1,747,074 (14,482,769,372 bp), and the N50 value was 9,716 bp. Reads of <1,000 bp were filtered using SeqKit v2.3.0, and then de novo assembly was conducted with Flye v2.8 (10). The assembly resulted in one circular complete genome of 5,010,245 bp, with a GC content of 66.79%. The quality of the genome assembly was assessed with Benchmarking Universal Single-Copy Orthologs (BUSCO) v5.2.2 with the bacteria_odb data set (11). The result showed that 123 of the 124 BUSCOs were complete single-copy BUSCOs. The genome was annotated using the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP) v6.5 (12). The genome of NIBR02145 contained 4,561 coding sequences, 6 rRNAs, 52 tRNAs, and 3 noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs). The statistical information for the genome sequence of NIBR02145 is presented in Table 1. The 16S rRNA gene of NIBR02145 was compared with the NCBI 16S rRNA gene database using BLASTn (13). In the BLASTn comparison, the 16S rRNA gene of Sphingomonas kyeonggiensis THG-DT81 (GenBank accession number NR_134182.1) showed the greatest similarity (98.5%). In addition, average nucleotide identity (ANI) values were calculated with pyani v0.2.12 (14). The greatest ANI value was 87.3% for S. kyeonggiensis THG-DT81. Default parameters were used for all software unless otherwise specified. All of these results suggested that NIBR02145 is closely related to Sphingomonas kyeonggiensis.

TABLE 1.

Statistical information for the genome sequence of Sphingomonas sp. strain NIBR02145

Parameter Value
No. of PacBio reads (>1,000 bp) 1,712,399
Genome coverage (×) 2,755
Genome size (bp) 5,010,245
No. of contigs 1
GC content (%) 66.79
No. of coding sequences 4,561
No. of tRNAs 52
No. of rRNAs 6
No. of ncRNAs 3

Data availability.

The complete genome sequence of Sphingomonas sp. strain NIBR02145 has been deposited in GenBank under the accession number CP114791. The raw data have been deposited in the SRA under the accession number SRR22805145.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by a grant from the National Institute of Biological Resources (NIBR), funded by the Ministry of Environment (MOE) of the Republic of Korea (grant NIBR202231203).

Contributor Information

Jaewoong Yu, Email: jwyu@egnome.co.kr.

Bongsang Kim, Email: kimbongsang@egnome.co.kr.

J. Cameron Thrash, University of Southern California.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Yabuuchi E, Yano I, Oyaizu H, Hashimoto Y, Ezaki T, Yamamoto H. 1990. Proposals of Sphingomonas paucimobilis gen. nov. and comb. nov., Sphingomonas parapaucimobilis sp. nov., Sphingomonas yanoikuyae sp. nov., Sphingomonas adhaesiva sp. nov., Sphingomonas capsulata comb. nov., and two genospecies of the genus Sphingomonas. Microbiol Immunol 34:99–119. doi: 10.1111/j.1348-0421.1990.tb00996.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ryan MP, Adley CC. 2010. Sphingomonas paucimobilis: a persistent Gram-negative nosocomial infectious organism. J Hosp Infect 75:153–157. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2010.03.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lee J, Shin SC, Kim SJ, Kim B-K, Hong SG, Kim EH, Park H, Lee H. 2012. Draft Genome Sequence of a Sphingomonas sp., an Endosymbiotic Bacterium Isolated from an Arctic Lichen Umbilicaria sp. J Bacteriol 194:3010–3011. doi: 10.1128/JB.00360-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Farias ME, Revale S, Mancini E, Ordonez O, Turjanski A, Cortez N, Vazquez MP. 2011. Genome sequence of Sphingomonas sp. S17, isolated from an alkaline, hyperarsenic, and hypersaline volcano-associated lake at high altitude in the Argentinean Puna. J Bacteriol 193:3686–3687. doi: 10.1128/JB.05225-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Marizcurrena JJ, Morel MA, Brana V, Morales D, Martinez-Lopez W, Castro-Sowinski S. 2017. Searching for novel photolyases in UVC-resistant Antarctic bacteria. Extremophiles 21:409–418. doi: 10.1007/s00792-016-0914-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Takeuchi M, Sakane T, Yanagi M, Yamasato K, Hamana K, Yokota A. 1995. Taxonomic study of bacteria isolated from plants: proposal of Sphingomonas rosa sp. nov., Sphingomonas pruni sp. nov., Sphingomonas asaccharolytica sp. nov., and Sphingomonas mali sp. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol 45:334–341. doi: 10.1099/00207713-45-2-334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Sa-Correia I, Fialho AM, Videira P, Moreira LM, Marques AR, Albano H. 2002. Gellan gum biosynthesis in Sphingomonas paucimobilis ATCC 31461: genes, enzymes and exopolysaccharide production engineering. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 29:170–176. doi: 10.1038/sj.jim.7000266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Zhu L, Wu X, Li O, Qian C, Gao H. 2012. Cloning and characterization of genes involved in nostoxanthin biosynthesis of Sphingomonas elodea ATCC 31461. PLoS One 7:e35099. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hesham AE-L, Mawad AMM, Mostafa YM, Shoreit A. 2014. Biodegradation ability and catabolic genes of petroleum-degrading Sphingomonas koreensis strain ASU-06 isolated from Egyptian oily soil. Biomed Res Int 2014:127674. doi: 10.1155/2014/127674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kolmogorov M, Yuan J, Lin Y, Pevzner PA. 2019. Assembly of long, error-prone reads using repeat graphs. Nat Biotechnol 37:540–546. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0072-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Manni M, Berkeley MR, Seppey M, Simao FA, Zdobnov EM. 2021. BUSCO update: novel and streamlined workflows along with broader and deeper phylogenetic coverage for scoring of eukaryotic, prokaryotic, and viral genomes. Mol Biol Evol 38:4647–4654. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msab199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Tatusova T, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Nawrocki EP, Zaslavsky L, Lomsadze A, Pruitt KD, Borodovsky M, Ostell J. 2016. NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 44:6614–6624. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.McGinnis S, Madden TL. 2004. BLAST: at the core of a powerful and diverse set of sequence analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res 32:W20–W25. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Pritchard L, Glover RH, Humphris S, Elphinstone JG, Toth IK. 2016. Genomics and taxonomy in diagnostics for food security: soft-rotting enterobacterial plant pathogens. Anal Methods 8:12–24. doi: 10.1039/C5AY02550H. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The complete genome sequence of Sphingomonas sp. strain NIBR02145 has been deposited in GenBank under the accession number CP114791. The raw data have been deposited in the SRA under the accession number SRR22805145.


Articles from Microbiology Resource Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES