Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2023 Jul 18;18(7):e0287671. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287671

Fibrinolytic and antibiotic treatment of prosthetic vascular graft infections in a novel rat model

Mikkel Illemann Johansen 1,2,*, Søren Jensen Rahbek 3, Søren Jensen-Fangel 1, Gabriel Antonio S Minero 2, Louise Kruse Jensen 4, Ole Halfdan Larsen 5, Lise Tornvig Erikstrup 6, Anders Marthinsen Seefeldt 1, Lars Østergaard 1, Rikke Louise Meyer 2,7, Nis Pedersen Jørgensen 1
Editor: Noreen J Hickok8
PMCID: PMC10353806  PMID: 37463137

Abstract

Objectives

We developed a rat model of prosthetic vascular graft infection to assess, whether the fibrinolytic tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) could increase the efficacy of antibiotic therapy.

Materials and methods

Rats were implanted a polyethylene graft in the common carotid artery, pre-inoculated with approx. 6 log10 colony forming units (CFU) of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Ten days after surgery, rats were randomized to either: 0.9% NaCl (n = 8), vancomycin (n = 8), vancomycin + tPA (n = 8), vancomycin + rifampicin (n = 18) or vancomycin + rifampicin + tPA (n = 18). Treatment duration was seven days. Approximately 36 hours after the end of treatment, the rats were euthanized, and grafts and organs were harvested for CFU enumeration.

Results

All animals in the control group had significantly higher CFU at the time of euthanization compared to bacterial load found on the grafts prior to inoculation (6.45 vs. 4.36 mean log10 CFU/mL, p = 0.0011), and both the procedure and infection were well tolerated.

Vancomycin and rifampicin treatment were superior to monotherapy with vancomycin, as it lead to a marked decrease in median bacterial load on the grafts (3.50 vs. 6.56 log10 CFU/mL, p = 0.0016). The addition of tPA to vancomycin and rifampicin combination treatment did not show a further decrease in bacterial load (4.078 vs. 3.50 log10 CFU/mL, p = 0.26). The cure rate was 16% in the vancomycin + rifampicin group vs. 37.5% cure rate in the vancomycin + rifampicin + tPA group. Whilst interesting, this trend was not significant at our sample size (p = 0.24).

Conclusion

We developed the first functional model of an arterial prosthetic vascular graft infection in rats. Antibiotic combination therapy with vancomycin and rifampicin was superior to vancomycin monotherapy, and the addition of tPA did not significantly reduce bacterial load, nor significantly increase cure rate.

Introduction

Prosthetic vascular grafts are vulnerable to bacterial infections, and implant-associated infection is a serious complication, associated with both high morbidity and mortality [1]. The infection rate is approximately 3%, depending on the type of implant and anatomical location, a risk that persists for the remainder of the patient’s life [2]. Implant-associated infections are characterized by biofilm formation—a community of bacteria that exhibits an altered phenotype characterized in part by recalcitrance to antibiotic therapy [3,4]. Staphylococci are among the most frequent pathogens isolated from implant-associated infections [5].

The interaction between mammalian extracellular matrix molecules and Staphylococcus aureus is a key aspect of S. aureus biofilm pathology [69]. Of particular interest is the ability of S. aureus to evade the host organisms’ immune system by formation of a fibrin scaffold through enzymatic conversion of fibrinogen to fibrin [1012].

This interaction should be considered a target for new treatment options, as targeting the fibrin scaffold could potentially leave the bacteria vulnerable to antibiotics and the host’s immune response [11]. We have previously shown in vitro, that enzymatic dispersal of the bacterial biofilm with streptokinase increases the efficacy of antibiotic treatment against S. aureus biofilm infections [13]. However, tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) has replaced streptokinase for stroke treatment, as streptokinase treatment has an increased risk of hemorrhage. Further tPA has a more specific effect on fibrin bound plasminogen, and hence makes an attractive drug for repurposing for treating prosthetic vascular graft infection (PVGI) [14]. Although this concept has been tested in vivo in intravascular catheter (IVC) infections, it has not been tested in a PVGI model [15]. To test this, we developed a model in which a graft, inoculated with Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), was implanted in the artery of rats. This would In our opinion better reflect the clinical situation of a vascular graft infection.

We then hypothesized that vancomycin, in combination with rifampicin, would be superior to monotherapy with vancomycin for the treatment of acute PVGI. Finally, we hypothesized that addition of fibrinolytic treatment using tPA would improve treatment outcome.

Materials and methods

Ethical statement

This study was approved by the Danish Animal Experiments Inspectorate under permission 2017-15-0201-01153 and 2022-15-0201-01132 and was carried out in accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Research Council and under the supervision of the Institute of Biomedicine, Aarhus University’s veterinarians. To comply with the 3Rs, we chose to power our study to test the best antibiotic treatment ± tPA. This would allow us to test our hypothesis if tPA would increase efficacy of the treatment we find most clinically relevant. Sample size calculation was based on existing models, with an assumption of <50% cure rate for vancomycin and rifampicin treated animals and a >90% cure rate using tPA and antibiotic combination treatment with an alpha value of 0.05, a beta value of 0.20 and a power of 80% resulted in a sample size of 18 animals pr. treatment group.

Study animals

A total of 76 adult male Sprague-Dawley rats (Janvier Labs, Le Genest-Saint-Isle, France) (300-350g) were included in the study. Rats were housed at the Institute of Biomedicine, Aarhus University, at standard room temperature, humidity and 12 h day/night cycle with free access to food and water. Animals had an acclimatization period of one week after arrival.

Bacterial strain preparation

For all experiments we used the isolate USA300 FPR3757 (ATCC® BAA-1556), a clinical MRSA isolate from an abscess infection [16]. Colonies from a 48-h old culture, grown on brain heart infusion (BHI) agar plates, were incubated overnight in BHI media for 18 h at 37°C. The overnight culture was then centrifuged for 5 min at 503 g, and washed in phosphate buffered saline (PBS). This was repeated three times. The culture was then diluted in a modified BHI media (supplemented with 2.1 mM CaCl2 and 0.4 mM MgCl2) to OD600 = 0.1 (5x107 CFU/mL).

In vitro biofilm dispersal assay

Biofilm were grown using the assay by Jørgensen et al [13]. Peg-lid (NUNC-TSP 445497, Thermo Fisher) were preconditioned in BHI enriched with 10% fresh human plasma for 30 min at 37°C and then transferred to a 96-well (NUNC 161093, Thermo Fisher) with OD-adjusted overnight culture (OD600 = 0.1) and incubated for 2h at 37°C. The peg-lid were then transferred back to the pre-conditioning plate and incubated for 24h at 37°C. The peg-lids were treated in 96-well plates with tPA 2500 U/mL, ±10% plasma or streptokinase 500 U/mL (streptokinase from β-hemolytic Streptococcus, Sigma-Aldrich) ±10% plasma and incubated for 30 min at 37°C. Following treatment, the peg-lid was air-dried for 30 min at room temperature, then transferred to a 96-well plate containing Gram’s crystal violet (Sigma-Aldrich) solution and incubated for 10 min at room temperature. The peg-lid was washed twice in demineralized water and then air-dried for 30 min at room temperature. The Gram stains on the peg-lid were extracted with 33% acetic acid and the absorbance of the extracted stain was read with a plate reader at 590 nm.

Antibiotic susceptibility testing using minimum biofilm eradication concentration

Biofilms were prepared as described above, but peg-lids were preconditioned with plasma for 60 min instead of 30 min, and rotational shaking 50 rpm was added to the incubation step. After incubation for 24h, the peg-lids were transferred to new 96-well plates containing fresh BHI media and 10% human plasma and incubated for 24h at 37°C, 50 rpm. The peg-lids were then transferred to two 96-well plates containing vancomycin in two fold dilutions and rifampicin at a fixed concentration (10 mg/L), one plate was added tPA (2500 U/mL) to all wells and then incubated for 24h at 37°C, 50 rpm. Peglids were then washed twice in fresh BHI media for 1 min, and transferred to a 96-well plate containing fresh BHI media and sonicated in a ultrasonication bath (USCS1700 T, VWR) at 45 kHz and 110 W for 10 min, followed by incubation for 24h at 37°C. The minimum biofilm eradication concentration (MBEC) was determined by measuring OD600 on a plate reader.

Inoculation of vascular grafts

Polyethylene (Intramedic® Polyethylene Tubing PE 50) with a diameter of 0.965 mm (outer) and 0.53 mm (inner) was used as a vascular conduit. The PE tubing was filled with heparinized rat plasma and incubated for 2 h at 37°C to precondition the grafts with extracellular matrix molecules. An overnight culture of MRSA was prepared, as described in the bacterial strain preparation. The overnight culture was then supplemented with 10% heparinized rat plasma, and filled into syringes. The syringes were connected to the PE tubing and then connected to a syringe pump (Harvard Apparatus, PHD ULTRA™ Syringe Pump) and the culture was run through at 200 μL/min for 2 h at 37°C. The tubing was cut in to 0.8 mm tubes, and stored overnight in PBS-soaked gauze at 4°C.

Prosthetic vascular graft infection model

Following acclimatization, rats were given a cefuroxime prophylaxis 30 min before surgery (50 mg/kg, B. Braun) and anesthetized with isoflurane (5% induction, 2,5% maintenance, Zoetis) and atmospheric air 1,5 L/min. The throat was shaved (Fig 1A), disinfected with 70% ethanol and, following an initial incision, the carotid artery was exposed by blunt dissection and separated from the surrounding tissue (Fig 1B). As soon as the artery was clamped, a stop clock was started, and blood flow was stopped for approximately 10 min (Fig 1C). A small incision was then made in the artery (Fig 1D), and the graft was placed within the artery fixated with two ligatures to prevent dislocation (Fig 1E). The ligature on the carotid artery was then removed, and reestablishment of flow through the graft and artery was subsequently observed with the naked eye in all animals (Fig 1F). During the preliminary studies with uninfected animals, we verified flow in the grafts with ultrasound (GE Vivid S6, GE Healthcare Denmark A/S). This was not possible during our later studies, as ultrasound was not available at the lab classified for work with MRSA. The rats were then returned to their cages once the incision was closed with sutures (“Monosyn, 5/0”, B. Braun) and the surgical site was disinfected. (Fig 1G). Buprenophine (Temgesic®, Indivior) was administered in their water supply the first four days (0.05 mg/mL), and they were weighed every four days.

Fig 1. Surgical procedure of rat PVGI model.

Fig 1

(a) Anesthetized rat with shaved and exposed chest prior to surgery. (b) Incision with view to the space created between the right sternocleidomastoid and the omohyoid muscle. (c) Common carotid artery exposed and ligated. (d) Blue arrow shows exposed common carotid artery, prior to insertion of graft. (e) Graft inserted in common carotid artery and secured with ligatures. (f) Green arrow shows graft with blood flow inserted in to common carotid artery. (g) Rat post-surgery, with wound closed with sutures.

Medical interventions

Ten days after initiation of infection, the rats commenced therapy. Animals were treated with antibiotics, reflecting best clinical practice [17], and tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) was chosen over other previously tested fibrinolytics, as this is the drug of choice for thrombotic events in the clinical setting [18]. The tPA dosage was chosen in order to correspond to a human dose for treating ischemic stroke [19]. Animals were divided in to five treatment groups: 1) 0.9% NaCl, (n = 8) 2) vancomycin 50 mg/kg (Fresenius Kabi, Bad Homburg, Germany) (n = 8) 3) vancomycin + tPA 0.9 mg/kg (”Actilyse”, Boehringer Ingelheim,) (n = 8) 4) vancomycin + rifampicin 25 mg/kg (“Eremfat”, Riemser) (n = 18) 5) vancomycin + rifampicin + tPA (n = 18). The animals were randomly placed in their cages by the staff at the animal facilities, three rats in each. Each cage was then randomized into one of the five treatment groups by letter randomisation. Antibiotics were injected intraperitonially every 12 h [20]. Doses of tPA were administered intravenously in the tail once daily, 30 min after antibiotic administration.

Rats were treated for 7 days, followed by 36 h of observation after the last antibiotic administration to ensure washout of antibiotics prior to sampling for CFU measurements. Animals were euthanized by cervical dislocation under isoflurane anaesthesia, grafts were removed, stored in 1 mL PBS and immediately subjected to analysis for quantification, and samples of organs (liver, spleen and kidney) were harvested and stored at -80°C.

Quantitative analysis of bacterial load from grafts and organs

Explanted grafts were submerged in 1 mL PBS and vortexed for 30 s in a Vortex Genie (Scientific Industries, Inc.) and subsequently sonicated in an ultrasonication bath at 45 kHz and 110 W for 5 min (USCS1700 T, VWR). The tubes were vortexed for 30 s and the bacterial suspension of each graft was serially diluted in triplicates, followed by plating onto BHI agar plates and incubated for 48 h at 37°C. Enumeration of CFU was done on the agar plates, and bacterial load was calculated. Organ samples were homogenized at 2 x 20 seconds 5000 rpm (Precellys 24 tissue homogenizer, Bertin Technologies), stored in wet ice for 5 min and run for one more session. CFU enumeration was done on the homogenate as described above. Following CFU measurements, the remaining sonicate and the graft from each animal were added to 20 mL of fresh BHI media and grown overnight at 37°C. This was done to increase the bacterial detection limit and have previously been done by both Jørgensen et al and Metsemakers et al [21,22]. All animals plotted as 0 CFU/mL had no growth on the agar plate or in the overnight culture of the graft with remaining sonicate.

Bacterial species identification and rifampicin resistance measurements

Following CFU enumeration, bacterial colonies from BHI agar plates were subcultured on 5% blood agar plates (Statens Serum Institute (SSI) Diagnostica) and incubated for 18–24 h at 35–37°C. After incubation, colonies from 5% blood agar plates were confirmed to be S. aureus with matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometer (MALDI-TOF) (Bruker Microflex, LT/SH system; Bruker Daltonik GMbH). To confirm rifampicin susceptibility, minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) determination was performed by gradient test (Etest strips, bioMérieux). For the preparation of inoculum, inoculation, and incubation, we followed the guidelines recommended by the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) (http://www.eucast.org). All MALDI-TOF and rifampicin susceptibility tests were performed at the reference laboratory at the Department of Clinical Microbiology at Aarhus University Hospital by trained staff.

Confocal laser scanning microscopy of infected prosthetic vascular grafts

A total of nine rats were used for visualisation of fibrin and biofilm on the graft. Following the protocol for the PVGI model described above, animals were divided into three groups: 1) 10 days infection, no treatment (n = 3), 2) 19 days infection, no treatment (n = 3), 3) 19 days infection, seven days treatment with vancomycin+rifampicin+tPA (n = 3). At the end of infection period, animals were euthanized and grafts were removed for immediate analysis. The vascular grafts were sliced into round as well as oblong slices and treated (1) in a blocking solution of 3% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in 1x PBS for 3 min, followed by (2) immunolabelling of the slices in the blocking solution containing 10 mg/L anti-fibrin antibody (59D8, Atto488 conjugated rabbit IgG) (Absolute Antibody) for 75 min, followed by (3) washing the slices in the blocking solution and (4) staining the bacterial and immune cells in 10 μM SYTO41 (intracellular DNA binding stain, Thermofisher Scientific) solution in 100 mM NaCl. The slices were then visualized by confocal laser scanning microscopy using Zeiss 20x objective and the following settings: 488 nm laser (4.0%, gain 1200) as track 1 and 405 nm laser (2.0%, gain 900) as track 2.

Histological analysis

6 rats were used for histological and immunohistochemical analysis. Rats were operated following the PVGI protocol described above and divided in to two groups: 1) sterile implant, euthanized day 19 post-surgery (n = 3), 2) MRSA infected implant, euthanized day 19 post-surgery (n = 3). Following euthanasia, the left and right arteries, including surrounding soft tissue, were dissected free in blocks of 5 x 5 mm. For the right artery, the vascular prosthesis was not removed and thus fixated and processed for histology in situ. All tissue blocks were fixated in 10% natural buffered formalin for 2 weeks. Afterwards, tissue blocks were cross-sectionized and processed through graded concentrations of alcohol and embedded in paraffin wax. Sections of 2–3 μm were cut from both the right and left side and Haematoxylin and Eosin (HE) staining was used for evaluation of patho-morphology. In addition, sections from the right artery were also cut and stained with PTAH and Masson Trichrome to visualize fibrin and collagen, respectively. Neutrophil infiltration and fibroplasia were semi-quantitatively scored as absent, mild, moderate, or massive. Histology was performed by a blinded pathologist, unaware of group allocation and study design.

Immunohistochemistry

Sections of 2–3 μm were cut from paraffin embedded tissue blocks of the right artery and used for immunohistochemistry with a primary antibody against Staphylococci. The protocol has recently been published (Jensen LK 2023, APMIS). Briefly, no antigen retrieval procedure was carried out and sections were subjected to blocking of endogenous peroxidases in 0.6% H2O2 for 15–20 minutes. UltraVision Protein Block (AH Diagnostics, Tilst, Denmark) for five minutes was used to prevent additional unspecific staining. Sections were incubated overnight at 4°C with the primary antibody (Polyclonal mouse anti-goat staphylococci antibody, catalogue PA1-7246, ThermoFisher, Roskilde, Denmark) diluted 1:38400 in 1% BSA/TBS. Immunostaining was carried out using the UltraVision indirect Horse Radish Peroxidase (HRP) polymer-amplification technique. Following incubation with HRP-polymer (LabVision, Värmdö, Sweden) the sections were incubated with a red chromogen solution (AEC from LabVision). All stains were counterstained with Mayers haematoxylin. Negative staining controls were run on parallel sections and included substitution of the primary antibody with 1% BSA and a nonsense antibody (Rabbit immunoglobulin fraction, catalogue X0903, DAKO A/S, Glostrup, Denmark) of the same concentration as the primary reagent, respectively. A porcine lung experimentally infected with S. aureus was used as positive control. All tissue slides were evaluated under high power (400 x magnification) and the presence and localization of red positive bacteria was registered. IHC was performed by a blinded pathologist, unaware of group allocation and study design.

Statistical analysis

The distribution of data was assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Differences in mean biofilm biomass were assessed via unpaired Student’s t-test and presented as mean ± SD. Differences in weight changes and log CFU/mL were presented as mean ± SD for normally distributed data, and assessed via two-tailed, unpaired Mann-Whitney test for non-parametric data, presented as median with interquartile range (IQR). This was followed by a post hoc analysis using the Holm-Bonferroni test. Differences in cure rate were assessed via Fisher’s exact test. All statistical calculations and figures were made with GraphPad Prism 9.0.0 (Graphpad Software).

Results

tPA and streptokinase were able to partly disperse biofilms grown in vitro

tPA and streptokinase were able to partially disperse a 24h old S. aureus biofilm. 30 min treatment with tPA lead to a 1.6 fold reduction in biofilm biomass from 12.41 to 7.72 (p = 0.038) and streptokinase treatment lead to a 1.7 fold reduction in biofilm biomass from 12.41 to 7.16 (p = 0.024). The addition of plasma to the treatment step did not lead to a further decrease in biofilm biomass for streptokinase although (p = 0.0086). However, adding plasma to the treatment step diminished the effect of tPA leading to a 1.3-fold reduction in biofilm biomass from 12.41 to 9.20 (p = 0.091).

tPA does not increase biofilm antibiotic susceptibility in vitro

tPA was not able to decrease the MBEC value for vancomycin, in fact there was a 2-fold increase in vancomycin MBEC when tPA was added to treatment (Table 1). Similarly, an increase in vancomycin MBEC was observed when combined with rifampicin and tPA. Regardless of adding tPA or not, vancomycin MBEC was dramatically reduced when adding rifampicin.

Table 1. Minimum biofilm eradication concentration for MRSA FPR3757.

Antibiotic MBEC (mg/mL)
-tPA +tPA
Vancomycin 256 512
Vancomycin + Rifampicin (10 mg/L) 2 8

Table 1: Impact of tPA on MBEC values for MRSA FPR3757 biofilms treated with vancomycin or vancomycin+rifampicin. Rifampicin was kept at a fixed concentration of 10 mg/L.

Animal welfare initially decreased following surgery, but initial weight loss was regained by the 8th postoperative day

A total of 58 of 61 animals completed the treatment study and were included in the final dataset. Three animals were excluded: one died whilst receiving a tPA injection, and subsequent autopsy failed to establish cause of death but no signs of haemorrhage were evident; one died immediately following the initial surgery, and one was excluded due to the absence of growth on agar plates, despite having macroscopic pus in the graft.

Clinically, the animals fared well. There was an initial weight loss following surgery in all groups. By day 12 post-surgery, all animals had regained the lost weight and weight increased throughout the treatment period, with an average weight increase of 10.1% (6.3%-17%) (Fig 2). Over the 19 days of infection, the mean weight increase was 17% ± 5.4 for the NaCl group (n = 8), 12.7% ± 2.8 for the vancomycin group (n = 8), 7.3%±2.9 for the vancomycin+tPA group(n = 8), 6.3%±2.9 for the vancomycin+rifampicin group (n = 18), and 7.0%±3.8 for the vancomycin+rifampicin+tPA group (n = 16).

Fig 2. Mean relative weight changes post-infection compared to starting weight.

Fig 2

NaCl (n = 8), Vanco (n = 8), Vanco+rif (n = 18), Vanco+tPA (n = 8), Vanco+Rif+tPA (n = 16). Vanco: Vancomycin, Rif: Rifampicin, tPA: tissue plasminogen activator. Symbols are mean values whereas error bars show one standard deviation.

Bacteria from grafts were S. aureus monomicrobial infection and systemic dissemination of infection was present in all groups, regardless of intervention

Mean bacterial load on the grafts after 19 days of infection in NaCl group was significantly higher than the bacterial load measured on grafts prior to implantation (an increase of 2.310 ±0.49 log10 CFU/mL, mean±SD, p = 0.0011 Students t-test). MALDI-TOF analysis confirmed that all samples grew monomicrobial S. aureus. Using the EUCAST clinical breakpoint for rifampicin (susceptible, MIC ≤0,06 mg/L), all isolates were susceptible to rifampicin with an MIC below 0.06 mg/L (Table 2). Regardless of intervention, the percentage of infected organs did not differ (Fig 3A) nor was there a difference between the number of animals with disseminated infection, i.e., percentage of animals from which viable bacteria was grown from either liver, kidney or spleen in addition to the graft (Fig 3B).

Table 2. Qualitative results on bacterial growth from explanted grafts.

Treatment (n = 58) + Growth (n = 49) - Growth (n = 9) Isolates susceptible to rifampicin, n (%) (MIC <0.06 mg/L) Cure rate (%)
Vancomycin + rifampicin (n = 18) 15 3 100 16
Vancomycin + rifampicin + tPA (n = 16) 10 6 100 37.5
Vancomycin (n = 8) 8 0 N/A 0
Vancomycin+tPA (n = 8) 8 0 N/A 0
NaCl (n = 8) 8 0 N/A 0

Table 2: Comparison of most effective treatments against PVGI, and amount of isolates showing rifampicin resistance. Results are shown as number of agar plates with or without visible growth.

Fig 3. Dissemination of infection.

Fig 3

(A) Percentage of animals in each treatment group with infections in the liver, kidney or spleen. The animals could have infection in more than one organ. (B): Percentage of animals in each treatment group with systemic infection (infection in either liver, kidney or spleen). NaCl (n = 8), Vanco (n = 8), Vanco+tPA (n = 8), Vanco+Rif (n = 18), Vanco+Rif+tPA (n = 16). Vanco = Vancomycin, Rif = Rifampicin.

tPA does not affect fibrin in biofilms on infected prosthetic vascular grafts

Confocal laser scanning microscopy was used to investigate if the vascular grafts contained a biofilm with fibrin. After 10 and 19 days of infection, clusters of tiny cells covered the surface of the implant, which was interpreted as being bacterial biofilms, although we were above the resolution (20x objective) to see the detailed outline of bacteria (S1 Fig and Fig 4). Fibrin was primarily found at the implant surface and interspersed between the bacteria, thus it was incorporated into the biofilm. Moreover there was an abundance of larger cells presumably murine immune cells clustered around the smaller cells and fibrin.

Fig 4. Tissue plasminogen activator (tpa) does not affect fibrin in the in vivo biofilm from rat prosthetic vascular graft infections.

Fig 4

CLSM images of the MRSA biofilm formed in prosthetic vascular grafts in rats after 19 days of infection (A) treated with NaCl and (B) treated with tPA. Cells (bacterial and murine) are shown in blue (SYTO41) and fibrin is shown in green (anti-fibrin antibody, 59D8, Atto488 conjugated rabbit IgG). The 2D images are shown as two-channel. Scale bar = 50 μm. (C) Quantification of 2D CLSM images in Daime based on three biological replicates (total n = 18).

Quantification of the total amount of fibrin from the graft after 19 days of infection revealed that there was no significant difference in amount of fibrin on the grafts between animals treated with NaCl and animals treated with vancomycin+rifampicin and tPA (Fig 4C). However, one of the explanted grafts from the tPA group did not contain any fibrin.

Profound histological changes evident after 19 days of infection

Briefly, the rat carotid artery wall contains four layers of elastic lamina which appear as pink lines in HE sections (Fig 5A). The elastic laminas are separated by smooth muscle cells. The area between the outermost and the innermost lamina is the tunica media (Fig 5A). The area towards the vessel lumen from the innermost lamina is the tunica intima, a monolayer of endothelial cells in intact vessels. Outside tunica media is the tunica adventitia located (Fig 5A).

Fig 5. Histological and immunohistochemic images of infected and sterile graft, artery and sorrounding tissue from rats 19 days after insertion.

Fig 5

A: Normal left a. carotis (HE), bar = 250 μm. B: Right a. carotis 19 days after insertion of a vascular graft. Neointima (ni) formation, tunica media atrophy (arrow) and fibrosis of tunica adventitia (HE), bar = 100 μm. C-F: Right a. carotis 19 days after insertion of a vascular graft and inoculation with Staphylococcus aureus. C: Pink fibrin (f) is present within graft lumen. Neutrophil granulocyte (ng) infiltration, broken elastic bands (arrow) and surrounding macrophages and collagen producing fibroblasts (HE), bar = 200 μm. D: Masson trichrome staining to identify collagen in blue, bar = 200 μm. E: Red S. aureus positive bacteria located on fibrin within graft lumen (IHC), bar = 100 μm. F: Red S. aureus positive bacteria located on the vessel surface towards the graft. Insert shows red positive bacteria within a macrophage (IHC), bar = 80 μm.

Group 1

Animals in group 1 (sterile implant) were euthanized day 19 post surgery. In all animals, the graft lumen showed varying degree of fibrin exudation intermingled with erythrocytes. All animals had a broken tunica interna with neointimal hyperplasia including collagen deposition by fibroblasts (Fig 5B). Neointimal hyperplasia occurs because vascular injury activates smooth muscle cells in tunica media to induce neointima formation by cell proliferation and migration into tunica intima (Welt, F. G. & Rogers 2002). Tunica media was found atrophic in all animals, i.e., loss of smooth muscle cells. Commonly, elastic fibers of tunica media were broken and in two cases they were completely lost in focal areas, and the vessel wall was completely replaced by fibroplasia. Mineralization of tunica media was seen in two animals. Tunica adventitia was found fibrotic and with macrophage infiltration (Fig 5B). Peri-adventitial fibrosis, macrophage infiltration and dilated fibrotic lymph vessels was seen in all animals while two animals presented with peri-adventitial mineralization. Peri-adventitial granulomatous inflammation in relation to foreign bodies made by sutures were occasionally seen. Neutrophil infiltration was not observed in any tunica layer or in surrounding tissues.

Group 2

Animals in group 2 (infected implants) were euthanized 19 days post-surgery. In all animals, the graft lumen showed varying degree of fibrin exudation intermingled with erythrocytes and massive amounts of neutrophil granulocytes (Fig 5C). All animals had a broken tunica interna and loss of normal tunica media tissue architecture (Fig 5C). The vascular grafts were surrounded by a massive suppuration of neutrophil granulocytes which again was surrounded by massive fibroplasia and macrophage and neutrophil granulocyte infiltration (Fig 5C). Inside this area remnants of tunica media could be found, i.e., broken and curled elastic fibers with loss of smooth muscle cells (Fig 5C). The lesions continued into peri-adventitial fibrosis with massive macrophage and neutrophil granulocyte infiltration and dilated fibrotic lymph vessels (Fig 5D). One animal had a peri-adventitial abscess, i.e., bacteria surrounded by neutrophil granulocytes and with fibrotic encapsulation. Peri-adventitial granulomatous inflammation in relation to foreign bodies made by sutures were seen in one animal.

Immunohistochemistry reveal abundance of bacteria at day 19 post inoculation with intracellular location in neutrophils and macrophages

Positive and negative staining controls performed as expected, i.e., for the negative control application of 1% BSA and nonsense antibodies, respectively, resulted in sections without positive immunolabelling. For the positive control coccoid bacteria located centrally within the lung abscesses was found highly reactive, i.e., colored in red. Positive bacteria could not be identified in any animals of Group 1. In contrast, positive bacteria were identified in all Group 2 animals. Bacteria were identified in the graft lumen of all animals and in small colonies adjacent to the graft (Fig 5E and 5F). Intracellular bacteria were identified in neutrophil granulocytes and especially macrophages throughout the lesions (Fig 5F), i.e., also in peri-adventitial macrophages several mm from the graft. Bacteria of the peri-adventitial abscess was also found positive.

Rifampicin combination improves vancomycin treatment against acute PVGI but the addition of tPA does not increase efficacy

Monotherapy with vancomycin was ineffective, as it did not result in a significant reduction in median bacterial load on the implants, when compared to the NaCl control group (6.91 log10 CFU/mL, IQR 5.10–7.50 for vancomycin vs. 6.45 log10 CFU/mL, IQR 5.10–7.64 for NaCl, p = 0.88) (Fig 6). Adding rifampicin to vancomycin resulted in a median log10 CFU/mL of 3.50 (IQR 2.09–5.28) (n = 18) which was significantly lower than monotherapy vancomycin (p<0.0001, n = 8) and NaCl (p<0.0001, n = 8). The addition of tPA to antibiotic combination therapy did not decrease the bacterial load further (4.078 log10 CFU/mL, IQR 0.00–4.41, n = 16) when compared to vancomycin+rifampicin treatment (p = 0.26). Finally, the addition of tPA to vancomycin + rifampicin did not significantly improve the overall cure rate of the infection on the vascular grafts, as the cure rate in the vancomycin + rifampicin group was 16% vs. 37.5% cure rate in the vancomycin + rifampicin + tPA group (p = 0.25) (Table 2).

Fig 6. Effect of antibiotics and tPA on biofilms formed on grafts in vivo after a 7-day treatment period.

Fig 6

Each data point represents median Log10 CFU/mL of three replicates from one graft. Error bars represent median with IQR. Pairwise comparison of treatment groups (Mann-Whitney test, *p≤0.05 **p≤0.005).

Discussion

To our knowledge, this is the first rat model of a PVGI, in which the implant is located in an artery. This model closely mimics the environmental conditions of biofilm infections in vascular grafts, taking into consideration both interaction between host molecules and the specific implant material used for prosthetic vascular grafts, blood flow in the arterial circulation and the host immune response to an intravascular infection following major surgery. Previous models have primarily focused on IVC and subcutaneous implant models with vascular graft material [15,2326]. Only a single study has developed a mouse model of PVGI, but a murine model is not suited for testing fibrinolytic drugs, as mice generate substantially less plasminogen than rats [27,28].

We demonstrated that rifampicin could significantly reduce the MBEC of vancomycin to a level that is close to the MIC of 1.4 mg/L previously established for MRSA FPR3757 [29]. Previous studies have also found a positive effect of adding rifampicin to vancomycin treatment against MRSA biofilms. However none of these found the same dramatic decrease in MBEC. Our findings could be attributed to strain differences, as a previous study found that the MBEC range for vancomycin was 1–64 mg/L and 0.13–32 mg/L for rifampicin when tested against 40 different MRSA strains [30]

We were unable to demonstrate any benefit of adding tPA to vancomycin + rifampicin treatment both in vitro and in vivo (Table 1 and Fig 6). While our initial in vitro data demonstrated the biofilm could be partly dispersed (Fig 7) this did not increase antibiotic susceptibility (Table 1). Contrary tPA seemed to have a protective effect on the biofilm against antibiotics and this could also explain why tPA was not able to increase antibiotic efficacy in vivo. These findings are in contrast with our previous findings on streptokinase’s ability to improve efficacy of rifampicin-containing antibiotic therapy, but it must be noted that streptokinase had a much more dramatic reduction in biofilm biomass than observed in this study [13]. Enzymatic degradation of biofilm’s matrix components in combination with antibiotics has previously shown promising results in vivo against device-related infections [11,15,31]. tPA used as implant coating have previously shown to increase antibiotic efficacy in vivo although tPA did not show any antimicrobial efficacy by itself [31]. In another study, Nattokinase and TrypLE showed a 100% cure rate in combination with rifampicin [15]. It should be noted that a control arm consisting of rifampicin monotherapy was not included, making it difficult to assess the impact of the different constituents of the interventions. Fibrinolysis by Nattokinase and TrypLE is not dependent on plasminogen as tPA is, and human tPA has shown less sensitivity on rat plasminogen in vitro, and therefore some studies have used a higher dose compared to this study [32]. A higher dose might have increased the antibiotic efficacy, but this would not be comparable to the clinical situation and the human dose has previously proven effective for thrombolysis in rats [19]. Finally, the rats had undergone vascular surgery just 10 days prior to starting tPA treatment and in the clinical setting, initiating tPA treatment at this point after major surgery is a relative contraindication [33]. We thusly opted for a more conservative dosage.

Fig 7. Biofilm dispersal with tPA and streptokinase.

Fig 7

Mean biofilm biomass (± SD, n = 3) after 30 min treatment of 24 h old biofilm, measured by Gram’s crystal violet staining. Each data point represents mean amount of biofilm biomass. tPA: tissue plasminogen activator 2500 U/ml, Strepto: Streptokinase 500 U/ml, GC: Growth control MRSA USA300 FPR3757, Blank: No bacteria, +p: Refers to plasma (10% heparin stabilized human plasma) added to treatment step. Pairwise comparison of treatment groups with growth control (Student’s t-test, *P≤ 0.05 **P≤ 0.005).

Our study also demonstrated that while vancomycin monotherapy was ineffective, combining vancomycin with rifampicin markedly improved treatment (Fig 6). In previous in vivo S. aureus biofilm models, vancomycin alone has shown varying effect on biofilm, with a decrease in mean log CFU between 0.2–1.6 [20,34,35]. The same studies showed that the addition of rifampicin yielded a cure rate of 71–100%. This is in contrast to the 16% cure rate we found, although there was a significant decrease in median bacterial load on grafts (3.50 vs. 6.56, p = 0.0016). While these results are from animal models on implant-associated osteomyelitis, there are clinical data supporting rifampicin combinations for PVGI [36]. Further studies are needed in order to clarify, which antibiotics benefit the most from rifampicin for acute PVGI caused by staphylococci. This is clinically relevant, given that the most recent guidelines from the European Society for Vascular Surgery on treatment of vascular graft infections focuses mainly on the use rifampicin as an applied or localized treatment option [18], rather than a systemically administered treatment.

Whilst this is the first model of a true PVGI in rats, the model has some limitations. Contrary to previous studies and the presumed avenue of graft infection in real-world clinical practice, we chose to inoculate the grafts prior to surgery. Previous studies have shown this method to yield high rates of infection and reduce biological variation in the burden of infection in each animal [37]. Another limitation is the choice of PE as the graft material and future studies should seek to use either PTFE or Dacron as the choice of material may affect graft patency, which we did not have the equipment to study. Graft patency has previously been studied with MRI scans in a similar murine model, where patency was preserved, although with a significant decrease in blood flow [28]. Finally, post-surgical heparinisation was omitted as heparin stimulates biofilm formation by S. aureus and this would impact the microbiological outcomes of the study [38,39].

Although animals tolerated both surgery and treatment well, animals receiving combination treatment had a slower growth rate (Fig 2). This could be attributed to a loss of appetite, a common side effect of rifampicin, or to nausea for the tPA-treated animals, caused by prolonged anaesthesia during iv injections. The heterogeneous sample size of our treatment groups is an obvious limitation to our study but was an intentional choice to comply the 3R principles [40], whilst retaining the ability to test our hypothesis of whether tPA would improve treatment. This led to allocation of more animals to these two groups, as we felt it pertinent to test tPA against the most efficacious intervention.

Even under optimal conditions, not even half of our animals were cured from their vascular graft infection. Therefore a more potent antibiotic partner is needed, given the noted deficiency of vancomycin in clearing the infection. Future studies should investigate other conventional antibiotic treatment combinations with rifampicin and direct biofilm targeted therapy. This model is a valuable contribution to test hypotheses that could form the basis of future clinical studies.

Conclusion

We developed the first functional model of an arterial prosthetic vascular graft infection in rats. Antibiotic combination therapy with vancomycin and rifampicin was superior to vancomycin monotherapy, and the addition of tPA did not significantly reduce bacterial load, nor significantly increase cure rate.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Confocal laser scanning microscopy images of the MRSA biofilm formed in prosthetic vascular grafts in rats after 10 days of infection.

CLSM images of the biofilm formed at the vascular graft dissected crosswise (A) and lengthwise (B). Cells (bacterial and murine) are shown in blue (SYTO41) and fibrin is shown in green (anti-fibrin antibody, 59D8, Atto488 conjugated rabbit IgG). The 2D images are shown as two-channel. Scale bar 50 μm.

(PDF)

S1 Table. Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments (ARRIVE) guidelines checklist.

(PDF)

Acknowledgments

Parts of the study was presented at ISSSI 2018 conference in Copenhagen, Denmark, poster number P297

The authors wish to thank associate Professor Jacob Budtz-Lilly from the Department of Vascular Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital for excellent assistance in revision of this paper.

The Department of Clinical Microbiology at Aarhus University Hospital are thanked for its assistance in the microbiology laboratory.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by a PhD research grant from the Graduate School of Health, Aarhus University (MIJ), by Aarhus Universitets Forskningsfond (https://auff.au.dk/en/) (MIJ) and by Knud og Edith Eriksen Mindefond (Grant number 62786) (NPJ)(https://www.keemindefond.dk/). The funders did not play any role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Darouiche RO. Device-associated infections: a macroproblem that starts with microadherence. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;33(9):1567–72. doi: 10.1086/323130 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Høiby N, Bjarnsholt T, Moser C, Bassi GL, Coenye T, Donelli G, et al. ESCMID guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of biofilm infections 2014. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2015;21 Suppl 1:S1–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Archer NK, Mazaitis MJ, Costerton JW, Leid JG, Powers ME, Shirtliff ME. Staphylococcus aureus biofilms: properties, regulation, and roles in human disease. Virulence. 2011;2(5):445–59. doi: 10.4161/viru.2.5.17724 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Stewart PS, Costerton JW. Antibiotic resistance of bacteria in biofilms. Lancet. 2001;358(9276):135–8. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(01)05321-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Otto M. Staphylococcal Biofilms. Microbiol Spectr. 2018;6(4). doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.GPP3-0023-2018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Foster TJ, Geoghegan JA, Ganesh VK, Höök M. Adhesion, invasion and evasion: the many functions of the surface proteins of Staphylococcus aureus. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2014;12(1):49–62. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro3161 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Otto M. Staphylococcal infections: mechanisms of biofilm maturation and detachment as critical determinants of pathogenicity. Annu Rev Med. 2013;64:175–88. doi: 10.1146/annurev-med-042711-140023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Cheng AG, DeDent AC, Schneewind O, Missiakas D. A play in four acts: Staphylococcus aureus abscess formation. Trends Microbiol. 2011;19(5):225–32. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2011.01.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Rammelkamp CH, Hezebicks MM, Dingle JH. Specific Coagulases of Staphylococcus Aureus. J Exp Med. 1950;91(3):295–307. doi: 10.1084/jem.91.3.295 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Vanassche T, Peetermans M, Van Aelst LN, Peetermans WE, Verhaegen J, Missiakas DM, et al. The role of staphylothrombin-mediated fibrin deposition in catheter-related Staphylococcus aureus infections. J Infect Dis. 2013;208(1):92–100. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jit130 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Zapotoczna M, McCarthy H, Rudkin JK, O’Gara JP, O’Neill E. An Essential Role for Coagulase in Staphylococcus aureus Biofilm Development Reveals New Therapeutic Possibilities for Device-Related Infections. J Infect Dis. 2015;212(12):1883–93. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiv319 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Friedrich R, Panizzi P, Fuentes-Prior P, Richter K, Verhamme I, Anderson PJ, et al. Staphylocoagulase is a prototype for the mechanism of cofactor-induced zymogen activation. Nature. 2003;425(6957):535–9. doi: 10.1038/nature01962 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Jørgensen NP, Zobek N, Dreier C, Haaber J, Ingmer H, Larsen OH, et al. Streptokinase Treatment Reverses Biofilm-Associated Antibiotic Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Microorganisms. 2016;4(3). doi: 10.3390/microorganisms4030036 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Bivard A, Lin L, Parsonsb MW. Review of stroke thrombolytics. J Stroke. 2013;15(2):90–8. doi: 10.5853/jos.2013.15.2.90 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Hogan S, O’Gara JP, O’Neill E. Novel Treatment of Staphylococcus aureus Device-Related Infections Using Fibrinolytic Agents. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018;62(2). doi: 10.1128/AAC.02008-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Diep BA, Gill SR, Chang RF, Phan TH, Chen JH, Davidson MG, et al. Complete genome sequence of USA300, an epidemic clone of community-acquired meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Lancet. 2006;367(9512):731–9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68231-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Legout L, Sarraz-Bournet B, D’Elia PV, Devos P, Pasquet A, Caillaux M, et al. Characteristics and prognosis in patients with prosthetic vascular graft infection: a prospective observational cohort study. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012;18(4):352–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03618.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Chakfé N, Diener H, Lejay A, Assadian O, Berard X, Caillon J, et al. Editor’s Choice—European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2020 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Vascular Graft and Endograft Infections. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2020;59(3):339–84. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2019.10.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Haelewyn B, Risso JJ, Abraini JH. Human recombinant tissue-plasminogen activator (alteplase): why not use the ’human’ dose for stroke studies in rats? J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2010;30(5):900–3. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2010.33 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Vergidis P, Schmidt-Malan SM, Mandrekar JN, Steckelberg JM, Patel R. Comparative activities of vancomycin, tigecycline and rifampin in a rat model of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus osteomyelitis. J Infect. 2015;70(6):609–15. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2014.12.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Jørgensen NP, Hansen K, Andreasen CM, Pedersen M, Fuursted K, Meyer RL, et al. Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy is Ineffective as an Adjuvant to Daptomycin with Rifampicin Treatment in a Murine Model of Staphylococcus aureus in Implant-Associated Osteomyelitis. Microorganisms. 2017;5(2). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Metsemakers WJ, Emanuel N, Cohen O, Reichart M, Potapova I, Schmid T, et al. A doxycycline-loaded polymer-lipid encapsulation matrix coating for the prevention of implant-related osteomyelitis due to doxycycline-resistant methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Control Release. 2015;209:47–56. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.04.022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Chauhan A, Ghigo JM, Beloin C. Study of in vivo catheter biofilm infections using pediatric central venous catheter implanted in rat. Nat Protoc. 2016;11(3):525–41. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2016.033 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Zapotoczna M, Forde É, Hogan S, Humphreys H, O’Gara JP, Fitzgerald-Hughes D, et al. Eradication of Staphylococcus aureus Biofilm Infections Using Synthetic Antimicrobial Peptides. J Infect Dis. 2017;215(6):975–83. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jix062 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Revest M, Jacqueline C, Boudjemaa R, Caillon J, Le Mabecque V, Breteche A, et al. New in vitro and in vivo models to evaluate antibiotic efficacy in Staphylococcus aureus prosthetic vascular graft infection. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2016;71(5):1291–9. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkv496 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Mufty H, Van Den Eynde J, Meuris B, Metsemakers WJ, Van Wijngaerden E, Vandendriessche T, et al. Pre-clinical in vivo Models of Vascular Graft Coating in the Prevention of Vascular Graft Infection: A Systematic Review. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2021;62(1):99–118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Giezen J, Bouma B, Jansen J. Mice release less tissue-type plasminogen activator (tPA) and have more active clot stabilization by FXIII compared to rats which might explain their low rate of blood clot lysis. Fibrinolysis & Proteolysis—FIBRINOLYSIS PROTEOLYSIS. 1994;8:1–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Van de Vyver H, Bovenkamp PR, Hoerr V, Schwegmann K, Tuchscherr L, Niemann S, et al. A Novel Mouse Model of Staphylococcus aureus Vascular Graft Infection: Noninvasive Imaging of Biofilm Development in Vivo. Am J Pathol. 2017;187(2):268–79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Friberg C, Haaber JK, Vestergaard M, Fait A, Perrot V, Levin BR, et al. Human antimicrobial peptide, LL-37, induces non-inheritable reduced susceptibility to vancomycin in Staphylococcus aureus. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):13121. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-69962-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Rose WE, Poppens PT. Impact of biofilm on the in vitro activity of vancomycin alone and in combination with tigecycline and rifampicin against Staphylococcus aureus. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2009;63(3):485–8. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkn513 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kwiecinski J, Na M, Jarneborn A, Jacobsson G, Peetermans M, Verhamme P, et al. Tissue Plasminogen Activator Coating on Implant Surfaces Reduces Staphylococcus aureus Biofilm Formation. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2016;82(1):394–401. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02803-15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Korninger C, Collen D. Studies on the specific fibrinolytic effect of human extrinsic (tissue-type) plasminogen activator in human blood and in various animal species in vitro. Thromb Haemost. 1981;46(2):561–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Powers WJ, Rabinstein AA, Ackerson T, Adeoye OM, Bambakidis NC, Becker K, et al. Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: 2019 Update to the 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2019;50(12):e344–e418. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000211 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Niska JA, Shahbazian JH, Ramos RI, Francis KP, Bernthal NM, Miller LS. Vancomycin-rifampin combination therapy has enhanced efficacy against an experimental Staphylococcus aureus prosthetic joint infection. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013;57(10):5080–6. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00702-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Zimmerli W, Frei R, Widmer AF, Rajacic Z. Microbiological tests to predict treatment outcome in experimental device-related infections due to Staphylococcus aureus. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1994;33(5):959–67. doi: 10.1093/jac/33.5.959 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Coste A, Poinot M, Panaget S, Albert B, Kaladji A, Le Bars H, et al. Use of rifampicin and graft removal are associated with better outcomes in prosthetic vascular graft infection. Infection. 2021;49(1):127–33. doi: 10.1007/s15010-020-01551-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Jørgensen NP, Meyer RL, Dagnæs-Hansen F, Fuursted K, Petersen E. A modified chronic infection model for testing treatment of Staphylococcus aureus biofilms on implants. PLoS One. 2014;9(10):e103688. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0103688 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Shanks RM, Donegan NP, Graber ML, Buckingham SE, Zegans ME, Cheung AL, et al. Heparin stimulates Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation. Infect Immun. 2005;73(8):4596–606. doi: 10.1128/IAI.73.8.4596-4606.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Mishra S, Horswill AR. Heparin Mimics Extracellular DNA in Binding to Cell Surface-Localized Proteins and Promoting Staphylococcus aureus Biofilm Formation. mSphere. 2017;2(3). doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00135-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Burden N, Chapman K, Sewell F, Robinson V. Pioneering better science through the 3Rs: an introduction to the national centre for the replacement, refinement, and reduction of animals in research (NC3Rs). J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2015;54(2):198–208. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Noreen J Hickok

18 Jan 2023

PONE-D-22-33479Fibrinolytic and antibiotic treatment of prosthetic vascular graft infections in a novel rat modelPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Johansen,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Of particular concern is both the statistical analysis/sample size for the different animal groups, as well as the validity of a fibrinous biofilm. Within that context, the lack of an effect of TPA, in vivo, raised some concerns about the nature of the biofilm, and perhaps even the dosing regiment that was used in your model.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Mar 04 2023 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Noreen J. Hickok, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. We note that the grant information you provided in the ‘Funding Information’ and ‘Financial Disclosure’ sections do not match. 

When you resubmit, please ensure that you provide the correct grant numbers for the awards you received for your study in the ‘Funding Information’ section.

3. Thank you for stating the following in the Acknowledgments Section of your manuscript: 

"This work was supported by Aarhus University Research Foundation and Knud og Edith Eriksen Mindefond."

We note that you have provided funding information that is not currently declared in your Funding Statement. However, funding information should not appear in the Acknowledgments section or other areas of your manuscript. We will only publish funding information present in the Funding Statement section of the online submission form. 

Please remove any funding-related text from the manuscript and let us know how you would like to update your Funding Statement. Currently, your Funding Statement reads as follows: 

"This work was supported by a PhD research grant from the Graduate School of Health, Aarhus University (MIJ), by Aarhus University Research Foundation (https://auff.au.dk/en/) (MIJ) and Knud og Edith Eriksen Mindefond (Grant number 62786) (NPJ)(https://www.keemindefond.dk/). The funders did not play any role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript."

Please include your amended statements within your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Partly

Reviewer #2: Partly

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: I Don't Know

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Material/implant associated infections are still feared complications after surgery and can have devastating consequences for the patient. Infections of the vascular graft cause morbidity and can lead to death. Improved treatment options of the infection and the biofilm are therefore urgently needed. The authors of the study present a new rat model to investigate prosthetic vascular graft infection and possible treatment options. The model resulted in an infection rate 100% with survival of the animals over the experimental period. They tested the efficacy of tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) in vitro and showed a biofilm reduction of about 30%. In vitro evaluation of the effect of tPA plus antibiotics was not done. They went into the animal model and found a significant but only minor reduction of the CFU after antibiotic treatment, addition of tPA had no effect.

1. Line 56 ff. The cited studies are no all in vivo studies on IVC infection. Please be more careful with the citation of studies.

2. Line 70 ff: The authors explain the sample size calculation. I am not an expert in statistics, but it seems unusual to calculate the sample size only for the treatment group. They used a sample size of n=4 for the control and up to n=18 for the treatment groups. This difference needs further explanation.

3. Due to the comparison of multiple groups, a post hoc test is necessary.

4. Line 184 ff: please provide the values for the control group. Please give the unit for the values.

5. Fig. 2: Please show the individual data points (dot plots as in the other graphs)

6. The effect of tPA is not very pronounced compared to other substances and studies (see Ref 16) and it should be discussed why they used this substance with the low efficacy.

7. In a previous study (Microorganisms 2016, 4, 36, Ref 13) they saw a much higher biofilm dispersal with lower Steptokinase concentrations (500 vs 2500 U/ml). Please discuss this.

8. Why was not the combination of tPA plus antibiotics tested in vitro? This would have provided valuable data regarding the possible effect and might have foreseen the failure of the animal study.

9. Table 1. Please add the information also for the other groups.

10. Fig. 4: not all animals showed a systemic infection. However, in the abstract they mention infection in all animals. Please clarify.

11. Figure legends: Please check the sample size for the vanco-group. It should be n=5 as shown in Fig. 5 and described in the drop-out section.

12. They see a reduction from 6.56 log10 CFU/mL (Control) to 3.50 log10 CFU/mL (V+R). This effect is statistically significant, but is it clinically meaningful? Normally a log3 reduction is expected to show antimicrobial efficacy. This should be discussed.

13. They discuss several limitations and explain the rational for the study design. However, they do not address the limited in vitro effect, the missing antibiotics group in the in vitro study and why they went with this effect to the in vivo model.

14. Please check the separation of decimals within the text.

Reviewer #2: General comments

This is generally well written and potential valuable paper. However, I have two main concerns. I understand that the authors justifiably strived to use as few animals as possible, but I feel an important control is missing - to assess the impact and integration of the procedure alone by using an uninoculated graft. In addition to weight change the graft and surrounding tissue could be assessed after 10 and 18 days (i.e. immediately prior to treatment and at termination) by H&E or visual inspection. Another criticism is that although the animal model is designed to be a biofilm infection model there is no direct demonstration of biofilm on the untreated control graft. A further control would be to assess for biofilm at days 10 and at 18. If a fibrin coated biofilm did not form might this explain the limited activity of tPA? Confocal or SEM demonstrating biofilm in controls as compared to treated animals would significantly strengthen the manuscript. The grafts could have been sectioned for one piece to be imaged and the other for plate count.

Specific comments:

1) It would be useful to provide vancomycin MIC and also to assess, or provide a reference, on whether vanco and rifamp act synergistically or additively.

2) Why was tPA chosen for the animal studies over streptokinase?

3) It would be useful to show (or reference) whether tPA or streptokinase have any kind of antimicrobial activity.

4) can the authors explain why the untreated rats had a higher CFU load on the graft but also showed the most weight gain?

5) Fig. 5. The vanc + rifamp combinations show bimodal distributions. Is this possibly an artefact of plotting 0 CFU as zero rather than as the detection limit? If the bimodal distribution is real is there any evidence of why those particular mice may have cleared the infection from post-mortem exam during dissection?

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2023 Jul 18;18(7):e0287671. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287671.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


22 May 2023

Reviewer #1: Material/implant associated infections are still feared complications after surgery and can have devastating consequences for the patient. Infections of the vascular graft cause morbidity and can lead to death. Improved treatment options of the infection and the biofilm are therefore urgently needed. The authors of the study present a new rat model to investigate prosthetic vascular graft infection and possible treatment options. The model resulted in an infection rate 100% with survival of the animals over the experimental period. They tested the efficacy of tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) in vitro and showed a biofilm reduction of about 30%. In vitro evaluation of the effect of tPA plus antibiotics was not done. They went into the animal model and found a significant but only minor reduction of the CFU after antibiotic treatment, addition of tPA had no effect.

1. Line 56 ff. The cited studies are no all in vivo studies on IVC infection. Please be more careful with the citation of studies.

We thank the reviewer for making us aware of this mistake, this has been changed in the manuscript line 64.

2. Line 70 ff: The authors explain the sample size calculation. I am not an expert in statistics, but it seems unusual to calculate the sample size only for the treatment group. They used a sample size of n=4 for the control and up to n=18 for the treatment groups. This difference needs further explanation.

We agree that this is an unusual way of calculating sample size. Previous in vivo studies on antibiotic treatment of osteomyelitis in rats have also used diverging sample sizes in the different treatment arms [1, 2]. These studies did not include a sample size calculation, as we did. We initially did a pilot study with n=6 in each treatment arm to find the best antibiotic treatment to test tPA together with, since this was our main aim. Vancomycin and Rifampicin had the highest reduction in bacterial load on the grafts, and therefore we chose to calculate the final sample size based on a significant difference between vancomycin+rifampicin+tPA and vancomycin+rifampicin. We do however agree that the sample size of the NaCl group should have been larger to compare it to the other groups. Therefore, we have now included additional animals to increase the sample size of the NaCl, vancomycin and vancomycin+tPA group to n=8 for each group, so that they had an equal sample size (revised fig 7).

3. Due to the comparison of multiple groups, a post hoc test is necessary.

This is an important observation, which we agree on. All p-values have now been tested for type-1 errors using the Holm-Bonferroni test. The post hoc analysis did not lead to changes in our conclusions.

4. Line 184 ff: please provide the values for the control group. Please give the unit for the values.

Thank you for this comment, we agree that the wording could have been clearer, and therefore we have now revised the result section of the biofilm dispersal study (line 256-261). We chose to add the amount of reduction of each treatment when compared to the growth control, so that the effect of each treatment is more apparent. The values are the mean biofilm biomass measured as optical density.

5. Fig. 2: Please show the individual data points (dot plots as in the other graphs)

Fig 2 has now been revised to a dot plot

6. The effect of tPA is not very pronounced compared to other substances and studies (see Ref 16) and it should be discussed why they used this substance with the low efficacy.

We thank the reviewer for this comment. The reason for choosing tPA is that it is an FDA approved drug already in wide use for stroke patients. As such we thought it ideal for drug repurposing. This is opposed to TrypLE and nattokinase which are not FDA approved drugs. TrypLE and Nattokinase have been tested in vivo as catheter lock solutions where the drugs are installed as a local treatment at the site of infection however, we do not know if the antibiofilm effect of these drug would be as pronounced when given as iv injection or what adverse events such therapy would have [3]. Furthermore streptokinase works on free plasminogen resulting in fibrinolysis in the whole body which can cause thrombosis and hemorrhage and have shown to increase mortality compared to placebo [4]. TrypLE and nattokinase are both serine proteases that work directly on fibrin and we therefore considered in our design of this study that there would be risks involved using these drugs. tPA on the other hand only works on fibrin bound plasminogen and therefore it only has an effect around a thrombus or a fibrin covered biofilm. Therefore, we chose tPA as we felt it the most clinically relevant of the mentioned drugs.

7. In a previous study (Microorganisms 2016, 4, 36, Ref 13) they saw a much higher biofilm dispersal with lower Steptokinase concentrations (500 vs 2500 U/ml). Please discuss this.

Thank you for making us aware of this. We did actually use 500 U/mL streptokinase in this study, and the 2500 U/mL written in the manuscript is a type writing mistake, we apologize for that. We agree that it is a less pronounced effect of streptokinase, than seen previously, which we also touch upon in the manuscript line 424-428. The reason for this could be that we only used 10% plasma in our biofilms instead of 50%, and therefore there were less fibrin in the biofilm for the streptokinase and tPA to work on. We chose to reduce the plasma amount since 50% plasma with this isolate resulted in very dense biofilms in our initial experiments which were difficult to use in in vitro studies. Another reason for the difference in biofilm dispersal could be that we used another S. aureus strain than we used in Jørgensen et al [5]. Biofilm formation is very strain dependent and our S. aureus strain may incorporate less fibrin in its extracellular matrix.

8. Why was not the combination of tPA plus antibiotics tested in vitro?

This would have provided valuable data regarding the possible effect and might have foreseen the failure of the animal study. Based on this comment, we have performed an additional in vitro experiment to test if vancomycin MBEC was lowered +/- tPA and +/- rifampicin. This has been added to line 109-118 and line 274-282. We initially abstained from this, as we felt that the experimental conditions in the in vitro setup and the in vivo model were not comparable, and a negative finding in vitro not necessarily would rule out effect in vivo, as we would be delivering multiple doses into a living animal with a functioning coagulation system as well as an immune system. Although we did not find any effect of adding tPA to antibiotic treatment in vitro, there can be vast differences between an in vitro and an in vivo grown biofilm, among others gene expression and matrix composition, which can affect antibiotic tolerance [6]. Therefore it is important to test new treatment against complicated infections – such as PVGI, in different experimental setups.

9. Table 1. Please add the information also for the other groups.

Table 1 (changed to table 2 in the manuscript) was shown to demonstrate whether rifampicin resistance had developed in animals treated with rifampicin only. Since emergence of vancomycin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus during therapy is very rarely seen both in vivo and in patients, we chose to only present the groups that were treated with rifampicin. However, we have now added amount of plates with and without growth from the other treatment groups to table 2.

10. Fig. 4: not all animals showed a systemic infection. However, in the abstract they mention infection in all animals. Please clarify.

We have changed the wording in the abstract in line 32-35 and the wording in the result section line 406-407, to be more accurate. However all animals in the control group (NaCl) had an average log 3 CFU/ml increase in bacterial load on the grafts from implantation and until it was removed and we observed very high bacterial loads in all animals in the control group at the end of the study. This, to us, proves that the animals were infected, and that we developed a PVGI model with a high infectious load that was not cleared by the animal itself. Figure 4 demonstrates the rate at which disseminated infection was identified. Why this only occurred in 60% of untreated animals remains unanswered. Legout et al found only 29 positive blood cultures in a cohort of 85 confirmed PVGI cases in a prospective observational cohort study [7]. The infection rate in the untreated group is 100% when the grafts are investigated (Fig 7).

11. Figure legends: Please check the sample size for the vanco-group. It should be n=5 as shown in Fig. 5 and described in the drop-out section.

Thank you for making us aware of this, this has been changed to n=8 after we increased the sample size of this group.

12. They see a reduction from 6.56 log10 CFU/mL (Control) to 3.50 log10 CFU/mL (V+R). This effect is statistically significant, but is it clinically meaningful? Normally a log3 reduction is expected to show antimicrobial efficacy. This should be discussed.

We agree that it is always important to question the translational aspect of experimental studies. Whether the log reduction observed in this study would lead to a succesfull treatment outcome clinically is difficult to answer due to the following aspects. Firstly, at which bacterial load is the host immune system able to clear the infection? Secondly, the treatment duration in this study is much shorter than the typically used treatment duration for PVGI (>6weeks) – what would have happened, had the treatment been prolonged? Thirdly, what constitutes a robust treatment response in an animal model? The first point is difficult to address for PVGI models as such an experiment has to the best of our knowledge not been performed. To the second, a previous study in a rat implant-associated osteomyelitis model have shown a decreased effect of V+R treatment for 21 days of treatment compared to 48 h treatment [8]. However, there was a trend towards that treatment with V+R was still effective after 2 weeks of treatment although the median CFU on implants was 2 log higher compared to 48 h of treatment [8]. It should also be added that the log10 CFU/mL in our study is the median value and some of the animals had a bacterial load on the grafts that were below the detection limit. Finally, implant-associated animal models typically report good treatment outcomes with 4-5 reduction in log CFU on implants [2, 9, 10] Based on the reviewers input, we have amended line 390-391, and line 442-443 in the manuscript.

13. They discuss several limitations and explain the rational for the study design. However, they do not address the limited in vitro effect, the missing antibiotics group in the in vitro study and why they went with this effect to the in vivo model.

As the reviewer mentions there are several limitations in our study, which we have adressed. In the answer to comment 7, we have addressed the issue of our lower in vitro effect of tPA and streptokinase compared to other studies. The reason for our choice of fibrinolytic is discussed in comment 6. In regards to the missing antibiotic group we agree with the reviewer that this should have been done initially, and therefore we have now done MBEC assays of our antibiotics with and without tPA, so that all drugs in the study have been investigated in vitro and in vivo (line 109-118 and line 274-282). Including other antibiotics or enzymes is beyond the scope of this work.

14. Please check the separation of decimals within the text.

This has now been checked and revised in the manuscript

Reviewer #2: General comments This is generally well written and potential valuable paper. However, I have two main concerns. I understand that the authors justifiably strived to use as few animals as possible, but I feel an important control is missing - to assess the impact and integration of the procedure alone by using an uninoculated graft. In addition to weight change the graft and surrounding tissue could be assessed after 10 and 18 days (i.e. immediately prior to treatment and at termination) by H&E or visual inspection. Another criticism is that although the animal model is designed to be a biofilm infection model there is no direct demonstration of biofilm on the untreated control graft. A further control would be to assess for biofilm at days 10 and at 18. If a fibrin coated biofilm did not form might this explain the limited activity of tPA? Confocal or SEM demonstrating biofilm in controls as compared to treated animals would significantly strengthen the manuscript. The grafts could have been sectioned for one piece to be imaged and the other for plate count.

We thank the reviewer for the kind appraisal and for pointing out these important issues. We agree that the addition of a control assessing the impact and integration of the surgical procedure is necessary. To satisfy these points we have conducted a range of additional experiments.

Firstly, we have included 6 animals for histological analysis of the graft and surrounding tissue 19 days after surgery (see line 211-242 for methods and line 337-388 for results in the manuscript). Further, we have included an additional 9 animals for Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy of grafts after 10 and 19 days of infection to demonstrate that there was a fibrin containing biofilm on the grafts. The methods applied and results of the CLSM studies can be seen at line 196-209 for methods and line 318-329 for results, in the manuscript.

Specific comments:

1) It would be useful to provide vancomycin MIC and also to assess, or provide a reference, on whether vanco and rifamp act synergistically or additively.

Thank you for this comment. The MIC for vancomycin has already been established for MRSA USA300 fpr3757 to 1.4 ug/ml [11]. We understand the scientific value of adding this to the paper however, our aim was to test antibiotics +/- tPA against biofilm infections and not planktonic bacteria. Therefore we think an MBEC assay would be more appropriate, which we have now added to the manuscript, to test antibiotics +/- tPA in vitro (line 109-118 and line 274-282). To test synergism we would need to do a checkerboard assay. We agree that this would be interesting but it is not something you typically do in in vivo studies and therefore we feel that this is beyond scope of the study.

2) Why was tPA chosen for the animal studies over streptokinase?

An important question that is raised which we did address prior in response to comment 6 from reviewer 1 and have amended the manuscript to further clarify this in line 59-63. We wanted to use clinically approved drugs as to ensure that our study was translational and easily implementable in the clinic. Streptokinase has been outphased from the Danish hospitals, because of an increased risk of hemorrhage, and been replaced with tPA. Since patients suffering from acute PVGI have recently undergone a major surgery, we did not find it safe to use a drug with an increased risk of hemorrhage. Therefore, we chose tPA although it had a less pronounced biofilm dispersing effect than streptokinase.

3) It would be useful to show (or reference) whether tPA or streptokinase have any kind of antimicrobial activity.

A previous study has demonstrated that tPA has no antimicrobial effect using a polystyrene coverslip which was coated with tPA prior to subcutaneous insertion in to mice. This has been added to the discussion section line 430-432 [12].

4) can the authors explain why the untreated rats had a higher CFU load on the graft but also showed the most weight gain?

Since the initial weight loss is approximately equivalent in all treatment groups, we presume that the reduced weight gain in the other treatment groups could be attributed to the antimicrobial treatment and prolonged anesthesia during administration. This is explained in more detail in the manuscript line 462-464.

5) Fig. 5. The vanc + rifamp combinations show bimodal distributions. Is this possibly an artefact of plotting 0 CFU as zero rather than as the detection limit? If the bimodal distribution is real is there any evidence of why those particular mice may have cleared the infection from post-mortem exam during dissection?

We thank the reviewer for this important observation. Following CFU measurements of sonicate from explanted grafts, the remaining sonicate and the graft from each animal were added to 20 mL of fresh BHI media and grown overnight at 37°C. This was done to increase the bacterial detection limit on both graft and organs and have previously been done by both Jørgensen et al and Metsemakers et al [13, 14]. This has been added to the methods section line 178-182. All animals plotted as 0 CFU/mL had no growth on the agar plate or in the overnight culture of the graft with remaining sonicate. We feel confident that these animals have indeed cleared the infection in the prosthesis. It was however not possible to definitively assess macroscopically if the grafts were infected when inspecting them with the naked eye.

References

1. Albac S, Labrousse D, Hayez D, Anzala N, Bonnot D, Chavanet P, et al. Activity of Different Antistaphylococcal Therapies, Alone or Combined, in a Rat Model of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis Osteitis without Implant. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2020;64(2).

2. Park KH, Greenwood-Quaintance KE, Mandrekar J, Patel R. Activity of Tedizolid in Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Experimental Foreign Body-Associated Osteomyelitis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016;60(11):6568-72.

3. Hogan S, O'Gara JP, O'Neill E. Novel Treatment of Staphylococcus aureus Device-Related Infections Using Fibrinolytic Agents. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018;62(2).

4. Bivard A, Lin L, Parsonsb MW. Review of stroke thrombolytics. J Stroke. 2013;15(2):90-8.

5. Jørgensen NP, Zobek N, Dreier C, Haaber J, Ingmer H, Larsen OH, et al. Streptokinase Treatment Reverses Biofilm-Associated Antibiotic Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Microorganisms. 2016;4(3).

6. Coenye T, Nelis HJ. In vitro and in vivo model systems to study microbial biofilm formation. J Microbiol Methods. 2010;83(2):89-105.

7. Legout L, Sarraz-Bournet B, D'Elia PV, Devos P, Pasquet A, Caillaux M, et al. Characteristics and prognosis in patients with prosthetic vascular graft infection: a prospective observational cohort study. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012;18(4):352-8.

8. Vergidis P, Schmidt-Malan SM, Mandrekar JN, Steckelberg JM, Patel R. Comparative activities of vancomycin, tigecycline and rifampin in a rat model of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus osteomyelitis. J Infect. 2015;70(6):609-15.

9. Niska JA, Shahbazian JH, Ramos RI, Francis KP, Bernthal NM, Miller LS. Vancomycin-rifampin combination therapy has enhanced efficacy against an experimental Staphylococcus aureus prosthetic joint infection. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013;57(10):5080-6.

10. Saleh-Mghir A, Muller-Serieys C, Dinh A, Massias L, Crémieux AC. Adjunctive rifampin is crucial to optimizing daptomycin efficacy against rabbit prosthetic joint infection due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011;55(10):4589-93.

11. Friberg C, Haaber JK, Vestergaard M, Fait A, Perrot V, Levin BR, et al. Human antimicrobial peptide, LL-37, induces non-inheritable reduced susceptibility to vancomycin in Staphylococcus aureus. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):13121.

12. Kwiecinski J, Na M, Jarneborn A, Jacobsson G, Peetermans M, Verhamme P, et al. Tissue Plasminogen Activator Coating on Implant Surfaces Reduces Staphylococcus aureus Biofilm Formation. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2016;82(1):394-401.

13. Jørgensen NP, Hansen K, Andreasen CM, Pedersen M, Fuursted K, Meyer RL, et al. Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy is Ineffective as an Adjuvant to Daptomycin with Rifampicin Treatment in a Murine Model of Staphylococcus aureus in Implant-Associated Osteomyelitis. Microorganisms. 2017;5(2).

14. Metsemakers WJ, Emanuel N, Cohen O, Reichart M, Potapova I, Schmid T, et al. A doxycycline-loaded polymer-lipid encapsulation matrix coating for the prevention of implant-related osteomyelitis due to doxycycline-resistant methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Control Release. 2015;209:47-56.

Decision Letter 1

Noreen J Hickok

12 Jun 2023

Fibrinolytic and antibiotic treatment of prosthetic vascular graft infections in a novel rat model

PONE-D-22-33479R1

Dear Dr. Johansen,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Noreen J. Hickok, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: I highly appreciate the additional work of the authors. They increased the number of animals in selected groups and added further in vitro and in vivo data. All my comments are satisfactorily answered. Even though the new in vitro experiment do not highly support the in vivo study, the argumentation of the authors is clear and I agree.

Please check/correct the amount of Streptokinase used in the Biofilm assay (M&M): 500 instead of 2500 U/ml as mentioned in the rebuttal letter and in the figure legend.

Reviewer #2: The authors have done a good job of doing additional experiments and addressing my concerns. This work will be a valuable contribution to the field.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes: Paul Stoodley

**********

Acceptance letter

Noreen J Hickok

10 Jul 2023

PONE-D-22-33479R1

Fibrinolytic and antibiotic treatment of prosthetic vascular graft infections in a novel rat model

Dear Dr. Johansen:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Noreen J. Hickok

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig. Confocal laser scanning microscopy images of the MRSA biofilm formed in prosthetic vascular grafts in rats after 10 days of infection.

    CLSM images of the biofilm formed at the vascular graft dissected crosswise (A) and lengthwise (B). Cells (bacterial and murine) are shown in blue (SYTO41) and fibrin is shown in green (anti-fibrin antibody, 59D8, Atto488 conjugated rabbit IgG). The 2D images are shown as two-channel. Scale bar 50 μm.

    (PDF)

    S1 Table. Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments (ARRIVE) guidelines checklist.

    (PDF)

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES