Skip to main content
NCBI home page
British Journal of Industrial Medicine logoLink to British Journal of Industrial Medicine
. 1993 Jul;50(7):603–612. doi: 10.1136/oem.50.7.603

A nine year follow up study of renal effects in workers exposed to cadmium in a zinc ore refinery.

N J van Sittert 1, P H Ribbens 1, B Huisman 1, D Lugtenburg 1
PMCID: PMC1035496  PMID: 8343421

Abstract

Renal changes with time have been studied in 14 workers engaged in the production of cadmium (Cd) in a zinc ore refinery. These workers were examined once a year in the period 1980 to 1985 and 13 of them also in 1989. Four of the workers (group A) had been employed in an old Cd plant before 1973 and had received higher exposures to Cd than the other workers (group B). Average urinary Cd concentrations over the whole study period in workers of group A ranged from 6.9 to 9.2 micrograms/g creatinine (median 8.4 micrograms/g) and in workers of group B from 0.64 to 7.1 micrograms/g creatinine (median 1.9 micrograms/g). Renal effects were assessed by the determination of urinary N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase (NAG), beta 2-microglobulin (beta 2-M), retinol binding protein, albumin, total protein, and serum creatinine concentrations and activity. Urinary beta 2-M concentrations in three of four workers of group A were close to or marginally above the upper normal limit during the study period. The beta 2-microglobinuria was not, however, progressive. No values outside normal limits were detected for any of the other renal tests in workers of groups A and B, related to exposure to Cd. Dose-response relations showed that urinary Cd correlated significantly with urinary NAG activity and total protein and beta 2-M. The earliest change induced by Cd was seen for urinary NAG activity within normal limits of NAG excretion. The regression lines were similar in the surveys between 1981 and 1989, indicative of no progression to higher values for any of the renal tests. The current biological exposure index (BEI) of 10 micrograms/g creatinine for workers exposed to Cd, set by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH), therefore seems justified, although the safety margin is small. The World Health Organisation recommended limit and ACGIH (1992-3) proposed limit of 5 micrograms/g creatinine would provide a much larger safety margin, and could be regarded as an action point for increased health surveillance.

Full text

PDF
603

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bernard A. M., Lauwerys R. R. Continuous-flow system for automation of latex immunoassay by particle counting. Clin Chem. 1983 Jun;29(6):1007–1011. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bernard A. M., Roels H., Cardenas A., Lauwerys R. Assessment of urinary protein 1 and transferrin as early markers of cadmium nephrotoxicity. Br J Ind Med. 1990 Aug;47(8):559–565. doi: 10.1136/oem.47.8.559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bernard A., Buchet J. P., Roels H., Masson P., Lauwerys R. Renal excretion of proteins and enzymes in workers exposed to cadmium. Eur J Clin Invest. 1979 Feb;9(1):11–22. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2362.1979.tb01662.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bernard A., Lauwerys R. Cadmium, NAG activity, and beta 2-microglobulin in the urine of cadmium pigment workers. Br J Ind Med. 1989 Sep;46(9):679–680. doi: 10.1136/oem.46.9.679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Buchet J. P., Roels H., Bernard A., Lauwerys R. Assessment of renal function of workers exposed to inorganic lead, calcium or mercury vapor. J Occup Med. 1980 Nov;22(11):741–750. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bullock D. G., Smith N. J., Whitehead T. P. External quality assessment of assays of lead in blood. Clin Chem. 1986 Oct;32(10):1884–1889. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chavers B. M., Bilous R. W., Ellis E. N., Steffes M. W., Mauer S. M. Glomerular lesions and urinary albumin excretion in type I diabetes without overt proteinuria. N Engl J Med. 1989 Apr 13;320(15):966–970. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198904133201503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chia K. S., Ong C. N., Ong H. Y., Endo G. Renal tubular function of workers exposed to low levels of cadmium. Br J Ind Med. 1989 Mar;46(3):165–170. doi: 10.1136/oem.46.3.165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Elinder C. G., Edling C., Lindberg E., Kågedal B., Vesterberg O. Assessment of renal function in workers previously exposed to cadmium. Br J Ind Med. 1985 Nov;42(11):754–760. doi: 10.1136/oem.42.11.754. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Elinder C. G., Edling C., Lindberg E., Kågedal B., Vesterberg O. beta 2-Microglobulinuria among workers previously exposed to cadmium: follow-up and dose-response analyses. Am J Ind Med. 1985;8(6):553–564. doi: 10.1002/ajim.4700080607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Horak E., Hopfer S. M., Sunderman F. W., Jr Spectrophotometric assay for urinary N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase activity. Clin Chem. 1981 Jul;27(7):1180–1185. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Järup L., Rogenfelt A., Elinder C. G., Nogawa K., Kjellström T. Biological half-time of cadmium in the blood of workers after cessation of exposure. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1983 Aug;9(4):327–331. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.2404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kawada T., Koyama H., Suzuki S. Cadmium, NAG activity, and beta 2-microglobulin in the urine of cadmium pigment workers. Br J Ind Med. 1989 Jan;46(1):52–55. doi: 10.1136/oem.46.1.52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Laurell C. B. Electroimmuno assay. Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl. 1972;124:21–37. doi: 10.3109/00365517209102748. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Mueller P. W., Smith S. J., Steinberg K. K., Thun M. J. Chronic renal tubular effects in relation to urine cadmium levels. Nephron. 1989;52(1):45–54. doi: 10.1159/000185581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. PISCATOR M. Proteinuria in chronic cadmium poisoning. 1. An electrophoretic and chemical study of urinary and serum proteins from workers with chronic cadmium poisoning. Arch Environ Health. 1962 Jun;4:607–621. doi: 10.1080/00039896.1962.10663220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Piscator M. Long-term observations on tubular and glomerular function in cadmium-exposed persons. Environ Health Perspect. 1984 Mar;54:175–179. doi: 10.1289/ehp.8454175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Roels H. A., Lauwerys R. R., Buchet J. P., Bernard A. M., Vos A., Oversteyns M. Health significance of cadmium induced renal dysfunction: a five year follow up. Br J Ind Med. 1989 Nov;46(11):755–764. doi: 10.1136/oem.46.11.755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Roels H., Djubgang J., Buchet J. P., Bernard A., Lauwerys R. Evolution of cadmium-induced renal dysfunction in workers removed from exposure. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1982 Sep;8(3):191–200. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.2476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Smith N. J., Topping M. D., Stewart J. D., Fletcher J. G. Occupational cadmium exposure in jig solderers. Br J Ind Med. 1986 Oct;43(10):663–666. doi: 10.1136/oem.43.10.663. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Verschoor M., Herber R., van Hemmen J., Wibowo A., Zielhuis R. Renal function of workers with low-level cadmium exposure. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1987 Jun;13(3):232–238. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.2065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Journal of Industrial Medicine are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES