Skip to main content
PMC home page
British Journal of Industrial Medicine logoLink to British Journal of Industrial Medicine
. 1993 Nov;50(11):971–997. doi: 10.1136/oem.50.11.971

Ethylene oxide: an assessment of the epidemiological evidence on carcinogenicity.

R E Shore 1, M J Gardner 1, B Pannett 1
PMCID: PMC1035533  PMID: 8280635

Abstract

Mortality from cancer among workers exposed to ethylene oxide (EtO) has been studied in 10 distinct cohorts that include about 29,800 workers and 2540 deaths. This paper presents a review and meta-analysis of these studies, primarily for leukaemia, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, stomach cancer, pancreatic cancer, and cancer of the brain and nervous system. The magnitude and consistency of the standardised mortality ratios (SMRs) were evaluated for the individual and combined studies, as well as trends by intensity or frequency of exposure, by duration of exposure, and by latency (time since first exposure). Exposures to other workplace chemicals were examined as possible confounder variables. Three small studies by Hogstedt initially suggested an association between EtO and leukaemia, but in seven subsequent studies the SMRs for leukaemia have been much lower. For the combined studies the SMR = 1.06 (95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.73-1.48). There was a slight suggestion of a trend by duration of exposure (p = 0.19) and a suggested increase with longer latency (p = 0.07), but there was no overall trend in risk of leukaemia by intensity or frequency of exposure; nor did a cumulative exposure analysis in the largest study indicate a quantitative association. There was also an indication that in two studies with increased risks the workers had been exposed to other potential carcinogens. For non-Hodgkin's lymphoma there was a suggestive risk overall (SMR = 1.35, 95% CI 0.93-1.90). Breakdowns by exposure intensity or frequency, exposure duration, or latency did not indicate an association, but a positive trend by cumulative exposure (p = 0.05) was seen in the largest study. There was a suggested increase in the overall SMR for stomach cancer (SMR = 1.28, 95% CI 0.98-1.65 (CI 0.73-2.26 when heterogeneity among the risk estimates was taken into account)), but analyses by intensity or duration of exposure or cumulative exposure did not support a causal association for stomach cancer. The overall SMRs and exposure-response analyses did not indicate a risk from EtO for pancreatic cancer (SMR = 0.98), brain and nervous system cancer (SMR = 0.89), or total cancer (SMR = 0.94). Although the current data do not provide consistent and convincing evidence that EtO causes leukaemia or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, the issues are not resolved and await further studies of exposed populations.

Full text

PDF
971

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Austin S. G., Sielken R. L., Jr Issues in assessing the carcinogenic hazards of ethylene oxide. J Occup Med. 1988 Mar;30(3):236–245. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Benson L. O., Teta M. J. Mortality due to pancreatic and lymphopoietic cancers in chlorohydrin production workers. Br J Ind Med. 1993 Aug;50(8):710–716. doi: 10.1136/oem.50.8.710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bisanti L., Maggini M., Raschetti R., Alegiani S. S., Ippolito F. M., Caffari B., Segnan N., Ponti A. Cancer mortality in ethylene oxide workers. Br J Ind Med. 1993 Apr;50(4):317–324. doi: 10.1136/oem.50.4.317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. DerSimonian R., Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986 Sep;7(3):177–188. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Doll R. Occupational cancer: problems in interpreting human evidence. Ann Occup Hyg. 1984;28(3):291–305. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/28.3.291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dunkelberg H. Carcinogenicity of ethylene oxide and 1,2-propylene oxide upon intragastric administration to rats. Br J Cancer. 1982 Dec;46(6):924–933. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1982.303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fleiss J. L., Gross A. J. Meta-analysis in epidemiology, with special reference to studies of the association between exposure to environmental tobacco smoke and lung cancer: a critique. J Clin Epidemiol. 1991;44(2):127–139. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(91)90261-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gardner M. J., Coggon D., Pannett B., Harris E. C. Workers exposed to ethylene oxide: a follow up study. Br J Ind Med. 1989 Dec;46(12):860–865. doi: 10.1136/oem.46.12.860. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Greenberg H. L., Ott M. G., Shore R. E. Men assigned to ethylene oxide production or other ethylene oxide related chemical manufacturing: a mortality study. Br J Ind Med. 1990 Apr;47(4):221–230. doi: 10.1136/oem.47.4.221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Greenland S. Quantitative methods in the review of epidemiologic literature. Epidemiol Rev. 1987;9:1–30. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a036298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Greife A. L., Hornung R. W., Stayner L. G., Steenland K. N. Development of a model for use in estimating exposure to ethylene oxide in a retrospective cohort mortality study. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1988;14 (Suppl 1):29–30. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hogstedt C., Aringer L., Gustavsson A. Epidemiologic support for ethylene oxide as a cancer-causing agent. JAMA. 1986 Mar 28;255(12):1575–1578. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hogstedt C., Malmqvist N., Wadman B. Leukemia in workers exposed to ethylene oxide. JAMA. 1979 Mar 16;241(11):1132–1133. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hogstedt C., Rohlén O., Berndtsson B. S., Axelson O., Ehrenberg L. A cohort study of mortality and cancer incidence in ethylene oxide production workers. Br J Ind Med. 1979 Nov;36(4):276–280. doi: 10.1136/oem.36.4.276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hogstedt L. C. Epidemiological studies on ethylene oxide and cancer: an updating. IARC Sci Publ. 1988;(89):265–270. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. JOYNER R. E. CHRONIC TOXICITY OF ETHYLENE OXIDE. A STUDY OF HUMAN RESPONSES TO LONG-TERM LOW-LEVEL EXPOSURES. Arch Environ Health. 1964 May;8:700–710. doi: 10.1080/00039896.1964.10663741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kiesselbach N., Ulm K., Lange H. J., Korallus U. A multicentre mortality study of workers exposed to ethylene oxide. Br J Ind Med. 1990 Mar;47(3):182–188. doi: 10.1136/oem.47.3.182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lagakos S. W. Effects of mismodelling and mismeasuring explanatory variables on tests of their association with a response variable. Stat Med. 1988 Jan-Feb;7(1-2):257–274. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780070126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Morgan R. W., Claxton K. W., Divine B. J., Kaplan S. D., Harris V. B. Mortality among ethylene oxide workers. J Occup Med. 1981 Nov;23(11):767–770. doi: 10.1097/00043764-198111000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Poole C. Beyond the confidence interval. Am J Public Health. 1987 Feb;77(2):195–199. doi: 10.2105/ajph.77.2.195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Rothman K. J. A sobering start for the cluster busters' conference. Am J Epidemiol. 1990 Jul;132(1 Suppl):S6–13. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115790. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Shore R. E., Iyer V., Altshuler B., Pasternack B. S. Use of human data in quantitative risk assessment of carcinogens: impact on epidemiologic practice and the regulatory process. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 1992 Apr;15(2 Pt 1):180–221. doi: 10.1016/0273-2300(92)90049-f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Smith A. H., Bates M. N. Confidence limit analyses should replace power calculations in the interpretation of epidemiologic studies. Epidemiology. 1992 Sep;3(5):449–452. doi: 10.1097/00001648-199209000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Steenland K., Stayner L., Greife A., Halperin W., Hayes R., Hornung R., Nowlin S. Mortality among workers exposed to ethylene oxide. N Engl J Med. 1991 May 16;324(20):1402–1407. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199105163242004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Sullivan K. M., Foster D. A. Use of the confidence interval function. Epidemiology. 1990 Jan;1(1):39–42. doi: 10.1097/00001648-199001000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Teta M. J., Benson L. O., Vitale J. N. Mortality study of ethylene oxide workers in chemical manufacturing: a 10 year update. Br J Ind Med. 1993 Aug;50(8):704–709. doi: 10.1136/oem.50.8.704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Wong O., Trent L. S. An epidemiological study of workers potentially exposed to ethylene oxide. Br J Ind Med. 1993 Apr;50(4):308–316. doi: 10.1136/oem.50.4.308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Journal of Industrial Medicine are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES