Skip to main content
Indian Journal of Anaesthesia logoLink to Indian Journal of Anaesthesia
. 2023 Jun 14;67(6):564. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_438_22

Indian Society of Anaesthesiologists’ preoperative testing guideline: An insight

Habib M R Karim 1,, Mohd Yunus 1
PMCID: PMC10355347  PMID: 37476449

Dear Editor,

We appreciate the much-needed practice guideline on preoperative testing by the Indian Society of Anaesthesiologists (ISA).[1] The incorporation of the validity time of preoperative testing is praiseworthy. The current guideline considers extensive literature; still, it is felt that the expert’s opinion and prevailing practice have received equal importance, if not the upper hand, while formulating recommendations for minor surgeries, especially for complete blood counts (CBC).

The guideline has emphasised the prevalence of anaemia to be 14% in American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I–II patients and that the preoperative CBC would have high utility and impacts the outcome even in minor surgeries. However, while preoperative anaemia prevalence is variable, not all anaemias are moderate to severe to significantly impact the haemodynamics and outcome[2] or require transfusion. Further, blood loss, tissue handling and fluid shift in minor surgeries are nominal and can be easily tolerated by often asymptomatic patients of ASA I–II.

Interestingly, the guideline descriptions agree with the insufficient evidence for CBC in minor and intermediate surgeries.[1] Despite the negative recommendations for decades, routine testing has remained prevalent. Therefore, formulating a recommendation based on the prevailing practices will unlikely benefit the patient. Further, such interventions defy the global motto of cost-effective, quality and evidence-based medicine. Nevertheless, it will leave us at the prevailing crossroads of preoperative testing and fail to take a firm stance on medico-legal issues.[3]

The current guidelines will encourage randomised trials, plan a national-level study using information technology for preoperative testing[4] and formulate a robust future update on this aspect and a few other prevalent routine tests.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Umesh G, Bhaskar SB, Harsoor SS, Dongare PA, Garg R, Kannan S, et al. Preoperative investigations: Practice Guidelines from the Indian Society of Anaesthesiologists. Indian J Anaesth. 2022;66:319–43. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_335_22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Baron DM, Hochrieser H, Posch M, Metnitz B, Rhodes A, Moreno RP, et al. Preoperative anaemia is associated with poor clinical outcomes in non-cardiac surgery patients. Br J Anaesth. 2014;113:416–23. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeu098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Karim HM, Saikia P. We all live in the crossroad of 'preoperative testing'and 'testing time': An opinion. Indian J Health Med Law. 2020;3:1–4. Available from:https://lawjournals.celnet.in/index.php/ijhml/article/view/494 . [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Karim HM, Singha SK, Neema PK, Baruah TD, Ray R, Mohanty D, et al. Information technology-based joint preoperative assessment, risk stratification and its impact on patient management, perioperative outcome, and cost. Discoveries (Craiova) 2021;9:e130. doi: 10.15190/d.2021.9. doi:10.15190/d.2021.9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Indian Journal of Anaesthesia are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer -- Medknow Publications

RESOURCES