Skip to main content
PLOS Global Public Health logoLink to PLOS Global Public Health
. 2023 Jul 19;3(7):e0001732. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001732

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on exercise habits and overweight status in Japan: A nation-wide panel survey

Sae Ochi 1,*, So Mirai 2, Sora Hashimoto 3, Yuki Hashimoto 4, Yoichi Sekizawa 4
Editor: Collins Otieno Asweto5
PMCID: PMC10355423  PMID: 37467210

Abstract

A catastrophic disaster may cause distant health impacts like immobility and obesity. The aim of this research was to analyse the association of the COVID-19 pandemic and lifestyle factors -exercise habit and overweight status in the Japanese population. Nation-wide online questionnaires were conducted five times from October 2020 to October 2021. The changes in exercise habit, body mass index (BMI) and overweight status (BMI >25kg/m2) were compared between the first questionnaire and a questionnaire conducted a year later. Risk factors for losing exercise habit or becoming overweight were analysed using multiple regression. Data were obtained from 16,642 participants. In the early phase of the pandemic, people with high income and elderly females showed a higher risk for decreased exercise days. The proportion of overweight status increased from 22.2% to 26.6% in males and from 9.3% to 10.8% in females. Middle-aged males, elderly females, and males who experienced SARS-CoV-2 infection were at higher risk of becoming overweight. Our findings suggest that risks for immobility and overweight are homogeneous. Continuous intervention for elderly females and long-term intervention for males infected with SARS-CoV-2 might be especially needed. As most disasters can cause similar social transformation, research and evaluation of immobility and obesity should address future disaster preparation/mitigation plans.

Introduction

During and after a catastrophic disaster population health may deteriorate in many ways. This impact on health is not limited to direct acute conditions such as injuries, but also includes indirect and chronic effects caused by lifestyle changes, mental stress, job losses, and social disruption. In particular, after chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear, or explosive (CBRNE) disasters, fear about invisible hazards may cause social panic that often leads to a deterioration in the health of the population. For example, after the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant accident in 2011, the limitation of outdoor activities from fear of radiation exposure and other lifestyle changes led to an increase in metabolic syndromes such as hyperlipidaemia [1] and diabetes mellitus [2]. Some researchers estimated that this increase may have even shortened life expectancies to a greater extent than the small amount of radiation exposure caused by the accident [3]. Other health impacts among the evacuees included a decline in physical performance [4], increased obesity [5, 6], and a deterioration in mental status [7]. As the size of an indirect health impact surpasses that of a direct impact, preventing the indirect impacts is a key to retaining health in disaster areas.

Another type of CBRNE disaster, biological disaster, is a disaster caused by the rapid spread of disease caused by microorganisms. As fear of invisible microorganisms can cause social panic, the situation similar to nuclear disaster may happen. However, there is a paucity of research on these indirect health impacts and therefore more research is needed to address chronic conditions after a disaster and how communities can prepare and respond to disasters and public health emergencies.

The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic that started in late 2019 is one of the largest biological disasters of this decade. The virus had killed more than six million people by the end of June 2022 [8]. In addition, nationwide lockdowns, policies to encourage social distancing, travel restrictions, and voluntary bans of many activities in many countries may have caused severe social disruption and led to lifestyle changes such as alterations in eating habits [9, 10] and a decline in physical activities [11].

As a consequence of these changes, experts have raised concerns about an increase in the prevalence of obesity during and after the pandemic [12, 13]. Furthermore, previous research has suggested that COVID-19 itself may increase the risk of obesity [14]. However, the effect of such social disruption may be heterogeneous. A previous study targeting the population with obesity showed that only a limited number of people were vulnerable to lifestyle changes [15]. Other online surveys have even reported an improvement in body mass index (BMI) and eating habits among some groups of people [16, 17]. However, as these studies targeted the relatively younger population, there is a limitation in the generalizability of the findings. Therefore, a nation-wide survey is needed to understand the size and nature of the indirect impacts of the pandemic on risk factors associated with adverse health outcomes.

The “Continuing survey on mental and physical health during the COVID-19 pandemic” is a nationwide, longitudinal, online survey carried out by the Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry, Japan (RIETI), Japan. The current study used this data to analyse time trends and risk factors for exercise habit and obesity in addition to attitudes regarding vaccination [18] and infection avoidance behaviour in Japan [19]. The results will provide additional insight on the health impact of the pandemic and therefore will provide clues for developing effective disaster mitigation plans for future CBRNE disasters.

Materials and methods

The detailed method for data collection is described in our previous reports [18, 19]. In short, nation-wide online questionnaires were conducted five times: October 2020, and January, April, July, and October 2021. The questionnaire was conducted only for a year mainly due to limited finance. The online survey was called “the 2020 Continuing survey on mental and physical health during the COVID-19 pandemic” (hereinafter named the RIETI questionnaire survey), with the NTTCom Online Marketing Solutions Corporation commissioned to conduct and anonymize the survey. The researchers were provided with only de-identified data.

Target population

The participants were Japanese people aged 18–74 years living in Japan who were randomly selected from the database of registered monitors of the NTTCom. The participants were selected so that the demographic composition ratios of sex, age, and distribution of residential prefectures matched the population estimates of the Statistics Bureau of Japan (final estimates, May 2020). The aim was to enrol 20000 participants according to the eligibility of our study fund.

Data collected

The following data were collected

  • Background information: sex, age group, pre-existing conditions, marital status, yearly income, height, weight, and exercise habit before the COVID-19 pandemic

  • Infection status of SARS-CoV-2: past diagnosis, current infection, or no infection

  • Activities to avoid the virus: avoid poorly ventilated places, avoid crowded places, wear a mask, wash hands, disinfect belongings, gargle, change clothes frequently, keep a distance from others, refrain from seeing a doctor, and refrain from going out as much as possible

  • Exercise habit: days of exercise per week

  • Health status: patient health questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9) for depression status [20], GAD-7 for anxiety [21], and subjective health status on a six-point scale

  • Change in economic status compared to the previous questionnaire

Exclusion criteria

As the online survey was written in Japanese, people who could not read Japanese were excluded. After collection, the data were excluded for individuals who provided seemingly inappropriate answers, including non-existent zip codes, extreme outlying values for height and weight, and controversial answers throughout the five questionnaires such as a difference in age of two years or more. The respondents who took a very short time (less than five minutes) or a very long time (ten hours or longer) to answer the survey questions were also excluded.

Definition of changes in the early and late phases

We defined the period of the first and second questionnaire as the ‘early phase’ and that of the fifth questionnaire as the ‘late phase’ of the pandemic. Changes in habits in the early phase were evaluated by comparing the answers in the first and second questionnaires, while changes in the late phase were evaluated by comparing the answers in the first and fifth questionnaires.

Definition of exercise habit, obesity, and overweight

People who answered that they did not exercise (i.e., 0 per week) were categorised as ‘no exercise habit’. Changes in exercise habit were estimated by calculating the difference in exercise days at the time of each questionnaire, compared to that stated in the first questionnaire.

Obesity and overweight were defined as a BMI >30 kg/m2 and >25 kg/m2, respectively. As the proportion of obesity is not high in the Japanese population, the proportion of overweight status was used as an outcome for further analysis. Newly developed overweight status was defined as those who were not overweight at the time of the first questionnaire but became overweight in the following periods.

Statistical analysis

A change in exercise habit during the early phase was calculated by subtracting the exercise days per week in the second questionnaire from the days in the first questionnaire. A change during the late phase was calculated by subtracting the exercise days per week at the time of the fifth questionnaire from the days in the first questionnaire. The difference between exercise days in the first questionnaire and the following questionnaires were analysed using the paired t-test.

The social and psychological impact of the pandemic in Japan has been reported to be different according to sex [22, 23]. Therefore, the statistical analyses were separately conducted by sex. Differences between males and females were compared using the chi-square test.

Factors associated with changes in exercise days per week and risk factors for developing overweight status were analysed using a multiple linear regression model. For the sensitivity analysis, the analysis was conducted using factors in the early and later phases.

The statistical analyses were carried out using Stata/SE 16.0 (StataCorp LLC, College Station, TX, USA). P-values of < 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.

Ethical consideration

Written consent for participation was obtained online from all individuals who participated in the study. The present study was conducted with the approval of the ethics committee of Hiramatsu Memorial Hospital (No: 20200925).

Results

Of the 19,340 participants, 2,698 were excluded due to providing inappropriate or controversial answers. The remaining 16,642 (8022 males and 8,620 females) were included in the final analysis. The background of the participants grouped by sex is shown in Table 1.

Table 1. Background of the participants.

Differences between males and females were calculated by the chi-squared test for categorical variables and the t-test for numerical variables.

Total (N = 16,642) Male (N = 8,022) Female (N = 8,620) P
Categorical variables N % N % N %
Age group (yr) < = 30 2,813 16.9 1,081 13.5 1,732 20.1 <0.01
30–39 2,053 12.3 939 11.7 1,114 12.9
40–49 3,256 19.6 1,609 20.1 1,647 19.1
50–59 3,316 19.9 1,750 21.8 1,566 18.2
60–69 3,580 21.5 1,783 22.2 1,797 20.8
70–74 1,624 9.8 860 10.7 764 8.9
Income (10,000yen/year)* <300 4,292 25.8 1,873 23.3 2,419 28.1 <0.01
300–500 4,589 27.6 2,226 27.7 2,363 27.4
500–700 3,179 19.1 1,518 18.9 1,661 19.3
700–1000 2,795 16.8 1,428 17.8 1,367 15.9
>1000 1,787 10.7 977 12.2 810 9.4 <0.01
Marital status Married 9,905 59.5 4,814 60.0 5,091 59.1 <0.01
Divorced 949 5.7 362 4.5 587 6.8
Widow/widower 366 2.2 88 1.1 278 3.2
Never married 5,422 32.6 2,758 34.4 2,664 30.9
Pre-existing condition Obesity 567 3.4 364 4.5 203 2.3 <0.01
Overweight 2,586 15.5 1,783 22.2 803 9.3 <0.01
Hypertension 2,529 15.2 1,717 21.4 812 9.4 <0.01
Dyslipidemia 1,463 8.8 797 9.9 666 7.7 <0.01
Diabetes 796 4.8 610 7.6 186 2.2 <0.01
Heart disease 378 2.3 258 3.2 120 1.4 <0.01
Lung or respiratory disease 376 2.3 183 2.3 193 2.2 <0.01
Renal disease 120 0.7 76 0.9 44 0.5 <0.01
Cancer 242 1.5 108 1.3 134 1.6 0.26
Other condition 235 1.4 94 1.2 141 1.6 0.01
Activities to avoid virus Avoid poorly ventilated places 14,167 85.1 6,458 80.5 7,709 89.4 <0.01
Avoid crowded places 14,433 86.7 6,743 84.1 7,690 89.2 <0.01
Avoid talking at close distances 13,264 79.7 6,213 77.4 7,051 81.8 <0.01
Wear a mask 13,264 79.7 6,213 77.4 7,051 81.8 <0.01
Wash hands 16,019 96.3 7,574 94.4 8,445 98.0 <0.01
Change clothes frequently 3,579 21.5 1,583 19.7 1,996 23.2 <0.01
Gargle 11,433 68.7 5,245 65.4 6,188 71.8 <0.01
Disinfect belongings 4,859 29.2 1,986 24.8 2,873 33.3 <0.01
Keep distance from others 13,623 81.9 6,274 78.2 7,349 85.3 <0.01
Refrain from seeing a doctor 8,351 50.2 3,664 45.7 4,687 54.4 <0.01
Refrain from going out 10,151 61.0 4,606 57.4 5,545 64.3 <0.01
Exercise regularly 10,084 60.6 5,039 62.8 5,045 58.5 <0.01
Exercise habit (days /week) 0 6,558 39.4 2,983 37.2 3575 41.5 <0.01
1 2,454 14.7 1,261 15.7 1193 13.8
2 1,844 11.1 939 11.7 905 10.5
3 1,494 9.0 649 8.1 845 9.8
≥ 4 4,292 25.8 2,190 27.3 2102 24.4
Income change No change 10,941 65.7 5,321 66.3 5,620 65.2 <0.01
Increase 4,852 29.2 2,274 28.3 2,578 29.9
Decrease 849 5.1 427 5.3 422 4.9
Subjective health Very good 1,155 6.9 567 7.1 588 6.8 <0.01
Good 6,002 36.1 2,769 34.5 3,233 37.5
Relatively good 6,308 37.9 3,032 37.8 3,276 38.0
Relatively bad 2,405 14.5 1,219 15.2 1,186 13.8
Bad 616 3.7 340 4.2 276 3.2
Very bad 156 0.9 95 1.2 61 0.7
Numerical variable Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD p
BMI (kg/m2) 22.13 3.59 23.22 3.51 21.11 3.35 <0.01
Days of exercise per week 2.17 2.38 1.99 2.29 2.07 2.34 <0.01
PHQ-9 5.02 5.30 4.78 5.37 5.22 5.22 <0.01
GAD-7 3.27 4.39 3.09 4.40 3.44 4.37 <0.01

*10,000 yen≒110–130 USD

† p<0.05

¶ Disease due to which the participant was prohibited by a doctor from exercising, or disease or injury which caused major difficulties walking (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis or bone fracture)

According to the National Health and Nutrition Survey in Japan 2019 [24], about 33% of males and 29% of females had exercise habit of ≥ 2 days per week. Our data showed slightly higher percentage (36% in male and 34% in female) answered they had ≥ 2 days per week of exercise habit.

There was a significant difference between sexes in all the variables except for the prevalence of cancer. Female participants were more likely to take any infection avoidance behaviour. Male participants had a higher prevalence of exercise habit than females. During the survey, 5,117 (30.7%) of the participants provided at least one missing data or controversial response in the late phase.

Proportion of missing data in each questionnaire by sex and age category is shown in Table 2. The proportions increase with time and were higher among female participants and participants at younger age (≤30 years old).

Table 2. Dropout rate of participants in the following questionnaires by sex and age group.

Sex Age group Jan-21 Apr-21 Jul-21 Oct-21
N Dropout (%) N Dropout (%) N Dropout (%) N Dropout (%)
Male ≤30 643 40.5 539 50.1 440 59.3 347 67.9
30–39 676 28.0 633 32.6 572 39.1 522 44.4
40–49 1,380 14.2 1,385 13.9 1,280 20.4 1,249 22.4
50–59 1,586 9.4 1,543 11.8 1,465 16.3 1,451 17.1
60–69 1,617 9.3 1,601 10.2 1,520 14.8 1,525 14.5
70–74 783 9.0 794 7.7 750 12.8 745 13.4
Total 6,685 16.7 6,495 19.0 6,027 24.9 5,839 27.2
Female N Dropout (%) N Dropout (%) N Dropout (%) N Dropout (%)
≤30 980 43.4 874 49.5 629 63.7 532 69.3
30–39 786 29.4 754 32.3 655 41.2 602 46.0
40–49 1,325 19.6 1,292 21.6 1,218 26.0 1,188 27.9
50–59 1,248 20.3 1,254 19.9 1,178 24.8 1,147 26.8
60–69 1,408 21.6 1,449 19.4 1,324 26.3 1,230 31.6
70–74 611 20.0 659 13.7 610 20.2 553 27.6
Total 6,358 26.2 6,282 27.1 5,614 34.9 5,252 39.1

The comparison of the background of those with missing data and those with complete data are compared in the S1 Table. Younger people, those with lower income levels, and those who had never married were more likely to provide essential data.

Changes in exercise habit

The changes in exercise habits at the time of each questionnaire are shown in Fig 1. The proportion of people who reported less exercise days per week than that at baseline (October 2020) increased gradually with time, while those who reported more exercise days at baseline did not change throughout the study period. There was no apparent difference in this trend between males and females. Of the people who reported that they did not exercise at baseline (4,624), 806 (17.4%) reported they had begun to exercise after a year (at the fifth questionnaire). In contrast, 862 (12.6%) of those who reported exercising at baseline (6,841) stopped exercising over the same period. The standard deviations in both males and females increased slightly with time.

Fig 1. Change in exercise habit (days per week) compared with the first questionnaire (October 2020).

Fig 1

Only those who changed the habit are included. * p-values of a paired-t test comparing exercise days in each phase with those in October 2020.

To analyse the factors associated with changes in exercise habit, linear regression was conducted using the change in exercise days as the outcome variable. In the early phase of the pandemic (Table 3, left column), a decreased exercise habit was associated with a high income (> 10 million yen per year, equivalent to about 100,000 US dollars per year) in both sexes (males, -0.25 days [95% confidence interval -0.44, -0.07]; females, -0.32 days, [-0.51, -0.13]). Elderly females were also associated with decreased exercise days. Having a regular exercise habit at baseline was associated with an increased exercise habit in both sexes (males, 1.08 days [0.97, 1.19]; females, 1.28 days [1.17, 1.39]). An increased exercise habit in women was associated positively with PHQ-9 (0.02 (0.01 to 0.04) and negatively with GAD-7 (-0.03 [-0.05, -0.01]), although the size of this correlation was small.

Table 3. Factors in the early phase that associated with a change in exercise habit in the early and late phase.

Early phase (January 2021) Late phase (October 2021)
Male Female Male Female
Coeff 95%CI p Coeff 95%CI p Coeff 95%CI p Coeff 95%CI p
BMI (kg/m2) 0.00 -0.01, 0.02 0.93 0.01 0.00, 0.03 0.11 0.01 -0.01, 0.03 0.20 -0.01 -0.03, 0.00 0.10
Past diagnosis of COVID-19 -0.20 -0.81, 0.40 0.51 0.65 -0.19, 1.49 0.13 -0.89 -1.36, -0.43 <0.01 -0.46 -1.17, 0.26 0.21
Age group (yr) < = 30 0 (Reference) 0 (Reference) 0 (Reference) 0 (Reference)
31–40 0.01 -0.21, 0.23 0.91 0.06 -0.12, 0.25 0.49 0.25 -0.04, 0.54 0.09 0.09 -0.17, 0.35 0.49
41–50 0.11 -0.09, 0.31 0.28 -0.17 -0.34, -0.01 0.04 0.12 -0.14, 0.38 0.38 0.04 -0.20, 0.27 0.75
51–60 0.12 -0.09, 0.32 0.26 -0.20 -0.38, -0.03 0.02 0.24 -0.02, 0.51 0.07 0.03 -0.21, 0.27 0.82
61–70 0.03 -0.18, 0.24 0.78 -0.26 -0.45, -0.08 0.01 0.22 -0.05, 0.50 0.12 -0.01 -0.26, 0.23 0.91
71–80 -0.11 -0.35, 0.14 0.40 -0.40 -0.63, -0.17 <0.01 0.10 -0.20, 0.41 0.51 -0.03 -0.31, 0.26 0.84
Income (10,000 yen/year) <300 0 (Reference) 0 (Reference) 0 (Reference) 0 (Reference)
300–500 -0.02 -0.16, 0.12 0.82 -0.06 -0.20, 0.07 0.38 -0.06 -0.21, 0.10 0.47 0.00 -0.16, 0.16 0.99
500–700 -0.03 -0.19, 0.13 0.72 -0.06 -0.22, 0.09 0.41 -0.02 -0.19, 0.15 0.83 0.06 -0.12, 0.23 0.54
700–1000 -0.14 -0.31, 0.02 0.09 0.02 -0.14, 0.19 0.77 0.02 -0.16, 0.20 0.83 -0.10 -0.29, 0.09 0.29
>1000 -0.25 -0.44, -0.07 0.01 -0.32 -0.51, -0.13 <0.01 -0.09 -0.29, 0.10 0.35 0.12 -0.10, 0.34 0.28
Married -0.11 -0.22, 0.01 0.08 0.12 0.01, 0.24 0.03 0.02 -0.10, 0.15 0.71 0.01 -0.12, 0.14 0.85
Income No change 0 (Reference) 0 (Reference) 0 (Reference) 0 (Reference)
Increase -0.06 -0.17, 0.05 0.31 -0.05 -0.16, 0.06 0.37 -0.01 -0.13, 0.11 0.92 0.03 -0.10, 0.16 0.63
Decrease 0.30 0.07, 0.53 0.01 -0.28 -0.52, -0.03 0.03 -0.18 -0.44, 0.08 0.18 0.16 -0.14, 0.46 0.30
Lifestyle Avoid poorly ventilated places -0.04 -0.20, 0.12 0.62 -0.13 -0.32, 0.07 0.21 0.09 -0.11, 0.29 0.39 0.03 -0.24, 0.31 0.81
Avoid crowded places 0.07 -0.10, 0.25 0.42 0.03 -0.16, 0.22 0.76 -0.17 -0.40, 0.05 0.13 0.00 -0.28, 0.28 0.99
Avoid talking at close distances -0.09 -0.24, 0.06 0.26 -0.05 -0.21, 0.10 0.49 0.12 -0.08, 0.31 0.25 0.00 -0.22, 0.22 0.98
Wear a mask 0.06 -0.21, 0.32 0.67 0.16 -0.34, 0.65 0.54 0.19 -0.13, 0.52 0.25 0.02 -0.63, 0.67 0.95
Wash hands -0.15 -0.40, 0.10 0.25 -0.16 -0.56, 0.24 0.43 0.06 -0.20, 0.32 0.66 -0.06 -0.51, 0.40 0.80
Change clothes frequently 0.02 -0.13, 0.17 0.79 0.00 -0.13, 0.13 0.98 0.07 -0.09, 0.22 0.39 -0.13 -0.27, 0.01 0.08
Gargle 0.03 -0.08, 0.14 0.58 -0.04 -0.16, 0.08 0.51 -0.07 -0.20, 0.05 0.26 0.05 -0.08, 0.19 0.44
Disinfect belongings -0.09 -0.23, 0.05 0.21 -0.10 -0.21, 0.02 0.12 0.03 -0.12, 0.18 0.66 -0.04 -0.17, 0.10 0.60
Keep distance from others -0.01 -0.16, 0.13 0.85 0.02 -0.14, 0.19 0.78 -0.13 -0.31, 0.05 0.15 -0.05 -0.26, 0.17 0.65
Refrain from seeing a doctor 0.01 -0.10, 0.12 0.84 -0.04 -0.15, 0.07 0.51 -0.02 -0.15, 0.10 0.73 0.04 -0.08, 0.17 0.50
Refrain from going out 0.09 -0.03, 0.20 0.13 0.16 0.05, 0.27 0.01 0.02 -0.10, 0.15 0.71 0.00 -0.14, 0.14 0.99
Exercise regularly 1.08 0.97, 1.19 <0.01 1.28 1.17, 1.39 <0.01 0.13 0.02, 0.25 0.02 0.20 0.08, 0.31 <0.01
Subjective health Very good 0 (Reference) 0 (Reference) 0 (Reference) 0 (Reference)
Good 0.07 -0.14, 0.28 0.53 0.14 -0.07, 0.35 0.19 0.03 -0.21, 0.27 0.81 -0.08 -0.35, 0.18 0.54
Relatively good 0.26 0.04, 0.47 0.02 0.12 -0.09, 0.33 0.26 -0.09 -0.33, 0.15 0.47 -0.21 -0.47, 0.06 0.13
Relatively bad 0.26 0.02, 0.51 0.03 0.24 -0.01, 0.48 0.06 -0.13 -0.40, 0.14 0.34 -0.26 -0.56, 0.04 0.09
Bad 0.41 0.08, 0.74 0.01 0.21 -0.15, 0.57 0.25 -0.12 -0.48, 0.24 0.51 -0.40 -0.82, 0.01 0.06
Very bad 0.15 -0.39, 0.69 0.58 0.20 -0.40, 0.81 0.51 -0.16 -0.66, 0.35 0.54 -0.51 -1.12, 0.11 0.11
PHQ-9 0.01 -0.01, 0.03 0.34 0.02 0.01, 0.04 0.01 0.02 0.00, 0.04 0.11 0.00 -0.02, 0.02 0.98
GAD-7 -0.01 -0.03, 0.01 0.31 -0.03 -0.05, -0.01 0.01 -0.03 -0.05, 0.00 0.02 0.00 -0.02, 0.03 0.75

Controlled for pre-existing conditions.

*10,000yen≒100~130 USD

† p<0.05

In the later phase (Table 3, right column), the diagnosis of a SARS-CoV-2 infection was associated with significantly fewer exercise days in males (-0.89 [-1.36, -0.43]). In both sexes, a regular exercise habit at baseline remained associated with increased exercise days (males, 0.13 [0.02, 0.25]; females, 0.20 [0.08, 0.31]). Mental and physical status had no significant association with the changes in exercise habit in the later phase.

Change in BMI and proportion of obesity/overweight

Another impact caused by the pandemic might be an increase in body weight. The changes in BMI between October 2020 and October 2021 are plotted in S1 Fig. As some people showed a decrease in BMI, just calculating mean BMI may not accurately reflect overweight status. Therefore, the proportion of obesity/overweight and newly developed overweight status as well as mean BMI at each time period are shown in Table 4.

Table 4. Fluctuations in body mass index (BMI), proportion of obesity/overweight, and proportion of newly-developed obesity/overweight.

For BMI, the values at each time point were compared with those at baseline (October 2020) using the paired t-test.

Oct-20 Jan-21 Apr-21 Jul-21 Oct-21
Mean SD Mean SD p Mean SD p Mean SD p Mean SD P
BMI (kg/m2) Male 23.22 3.54 23.41 3.99 <0.01 23.39 3.79 <0.01 23.34 3.78 0.07 23.34 3.74 0.08
Female 21.13 3.49 21.20 3.91 <0.01 21.18 3.79 <0.01 21.14 3.81 <0.01 21.16 4.03 <0.01
Obesity (%) Male 4.5 4.1 4.3 4.2 4.0
Female 2.4 2.3 1.9 1.9 2.0
Newly developed obesity (%) Male Base 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.5
Female Base 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.4
Overweight status (%) Male 22.2 26.6 26.2 25.9 26.1
Female 9.3 10.8 10.7 10.6 10.5
Newly developed overweight status (%) Male Base 6.9 6.8 6.9 7.2
Female Base 2.7 2.9 3.0 2.9

Interestingly, the proportion of obesity appeared to decrease slightly over time, while the proportion of overweight status and mean BMI increased in both sexes. The standard deviation for BMI also increased over time in females. In addition, the proportion of newly developed obesity in males also increased during the first four questionnaires. The increase in BMI and proportion of overweight status was marked in the early phase (mean BMI from 23.22 to 23.41 in males and from 21.13 to 21.20 in females; proportion of overweight status from 22.2% to 26.6% in males and from 9.3% to 10.8% in females). In the later phase, the change became less marked, but remained statistically significant in females.

Risk factors for developing overweight status

As the proportion of obesity was too small to conduct further analysis, factors associated with the development of overweight status were determined by multiple logistic regression. In the early phase (January 2021) of the pandemic, the risk of developing overweight status was significantly higher in middle-aged males (31–70 years old) and elderly females (71–80 years old) (Table 5, left column). Males who were married were more likely to become overweight (odds ratio [OR] 1.61 [1.20, 2.16]), although this change was not observed in married females. On the other hand, females who frequently changed their clothes to prevent a COVID-19 infection (OR 1.68 [1.69, 2.60]) or those with a very bad subjective health condition were more likely to develop overweight status. An increase in income was also associated with the development of overweight status in females (OR 1.54 [1.08, 2.20]), but not in males (OR 0.78 [0.60, 1.01]).

Table 5. Odds ratios for newly developed overweight status in the early and late phases of the pandemic, grouped by sex.

Controlled for pre-existing conditions.

Early phase (January 2021) Late phase (October 2022)
Male Female Male Female
OR 95%CI p OR 95%CI p OR 95%CI p OR 95%CI P
Past diagnosis of COVID-19 0.63 0.14, 2.84 0.55 NC 2.57 1.18, 5.60 0.02 1.55 0.20, 12.13 0.68
Age group (yr) < = 30 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference)
31–40 2.72 1.38, 5.35 <0.01 0.93 0.42, 2.04 0.86 1.62 0.75, 3.52 0.22 0.57 0.21, 1.56 0.27
41–50 2.79 1.48, 5.29 <0.01 0.99 0.50, 1.99 0.99 2.35 1.16, 4.73 0.02 0.66 0.28, 1.53 0.33
51–60 2.65 1.39, 5.06 <0.01 1.28 0.64, 2.55 0.49 1.93 0.95, 3.94 0.07 0.88 0.39, 2.03 0.77
61–70 2.41 1.24, 4.68 <0.01 1.70 0.86, 3.37 0.13 1.75 0.84, 3.64 0.14 1.02 0.44, 2.36 0.96
71–80 1.79 0.87, 3.69 0.11 2.30 1.07, 4.94 0.03 1.22 0.55, 2.72 0.63 1.59 0.65, 3.90 0.31
Income (yen/year)* <300 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference)
300–500 1.06 0.76, 1.48 0.73 1.04 0.66, 1.64 0.86 1.26 0.88, 1.80 0.22 0.77 0.45, 1.30 0.32
500–700 0.92 0.64, 1.34 0.68 1.03 0.61, 1.75 0.91 1.00 0.67, 1.51 0.98 0.81 0.44, 1.49 0.50
700–1000 1.17 0.81, 1.70 0.40 0.81 0.44, 1.49 0.49 1.04 0.68, 1.58 0.86 0.95 0.50, 1.78 0.86
>1000 0.95 0.62, 1.45 0.80 1.11 0.57, 2.17 0.75 1.37 0.89, 2.11 0.16 0.99 0.49, 2.00 0.98
Married 1.61 1.20, 2.16 <0.01 1.42 0.94, 2.14 0.10 1.08 0.80, 1.46 0.61 1.47 0.92, 2.35 0.11
Income change No change 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference)
Increase 0.78 0.60, 1.01 0.06 1.54 1.08, 2.20 0.02 0.89 0.63, 1.24 0.49 0.90 0.52, 1.54 0.70
Decrease 1.02 0.60, 1.72 0.94 1.21 0.48, 3.07 0.69 1.67 0.86, 3.23 0.13 2.01 0.70, 5.83 0.20
Lifestyle Avoid poorly ventilated places 1.14 0.79, 1.65 0.49 0.60 0.31, 1.17 0.13 1.63 1.00, 2.64 0.05 0.34 0.15, 0.78 0.01
Avoid places where many people gather 0.92 0.62, 1.37 0.68 0.87 0.45, 1.70 0.69 1.18 0.71, 1.94 0.53 1.48 0.54, 4.02 0.44
Avoid talking at close distances 0.83 0.60, 1.16 0.27 1.29 0.74, 2.26 0.37 0.62 0.41, 0.94 0.02 1.34 0.62, 2.87 0.46
Wear a mask 1.17 0.64, 2.16 0.61 2.22 0.27, 18.53 0.46 1.61 0.74, 3.51 0.23 0.79 0.08, 7.33 0.83
Wash hands 0.85 0.49, 1.46 0.55 0.87 0.24, 3.18 0.84 0.72 0.41, 1.26 0.24 2.39 0.27, 21.25 0.43
Change clothes frequently 0.97 0.69, 1.36 0.86 1.68 1.09, 2.60 0.02 1.01 0.71, 1.43 0.97 1.43 0.89, 2.30 0.14
Gargle 0.84 0.65, 1.08 0.17 0.92 0.61, 1.37 0.67 1.03 0.77, 1.36 0.86 0.89 0.56, 1.40 0.60
Disinfect belongings 1.14 0.84, 1.56 0.39 0.80 0.52, 1.23 0.31 1.06 0.75, 1.48 0.75 0.72 0.44, 1.16 0.18
Keep distance from others 0.88 0.63, 1.23 0.46 1.00 0.56, 1.78 1.00 0.64 0.44, 0.94 0.02 1.01 0.47, 2.15 0.98
Refrain from seeing a doctor 0.86 0.67, 1.11 0.24 0.67 0.46, 0.99 0.04 1.14 0.86, 1.52 0.36 1.31 0.85, 2.02 0.22
Refrain from going out 1.21 0.94, 1.56 0.15 1.30 0.87, 1.95 0.20 1.02 0.77, 1.36 0.88 0.93 0.58, 1.48 0.76
Exercise regularly 0.97 0.76, 1.22 0.78 0.77 0.54, 1.10 0.15 0.95 0.73, 1.23 0.70 1.07 0.71, 1.61 0.74
Subjective health Very good 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference)
Good 1.30 0.76, 2.24 0.34 0.69 0.33, 1.46 0.33 1.16 0.67, 2.01 0.61 0.53 0.23, 1.24 0.14
Relatively good 1.35 0.78, 2.34 0.28 0.89 0.42, 1.86 0.75 0.98 0.56, 1.73 0.95 1.00 0.44, 2.30 1.00
Relatively bad 1.44 0.78, 2.64 0.24 0.96 0.41, 2.23 0.92 1.03 0.55, 1.94 0.92 0.97 0.38, 2.52 0.96
Bad 0.78 0.33, 1.86 0.57 0.93 0.27, 3.15 0.91 1.14 0.50, 2.62 0.75 0.47 0.09, 2.55 0.38
Very bad 1.61 0.46, 5.59 0.46 4.79 1.16, 19.7 0.03 1.53 0.51, 4.54 0.45 0.82 0.08, 8.14 0.87
PHQ-9 1.02 0.98, 1.07 0.33 1.01 0.95, 1.08 0.68 1.01 0.96, 1.05 0.80 0.99 0.92, 1.06 0.77
GAD-7 1.00 0.95, 1.05 0.86 0.99 0.93, 1.06 0.84 0.99 0.94, 1.05 0.82 1.03 0.95, 1.12 0.51

OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval

*10,000 yen≒110-130USD

p<0.05

In the late phase (October 2021) (Table 5, right column), males in the age group of 41–50 yr constantly showed a higher risk of becoming overweight (OR 2.35 [1.16, 4.73]). Interestingly, males who were diagnosed with a SARS-CoV-2 infection were also more likely to develop overweight status (OR 2.57 [1.18, 5.60]). Avoiding talking at close distances (OR 0.62 [0.41, 0.94]) and keeping distance from others (OR 0.64 [0.44, 0.94]) were also associated significantly with a lower risk of developing overweight status in males. In females, avoiding poorly ventilated place was associated with a lower risk of becoming overweight (OR 0.34 [0.15, 0.78]).

Long-term impact of the conditions in the early phase of the pandemic on the onset of overweight status

Assuming that overweight status in the late phase (October 2021) was affected by factors in the early phase (October 2020), further analysis was carried out on the association between being overweight in the late phase and lifestyle factors in the early phase as a sensitivity analysis (S2 Table).

In males, infection with the SARS-CoV-2 in the early phase correlated significantly with the development of overweight status in the late phase (OR 3.01 [1.27, 7.13]), while those who experienced a decrease in income showed a lower risk (OR 0.73 [0.54, 0.97]). On the other hand, females whose income decreased in the early phase were more likely to become overweight in the late phase (OR 1.75 [1.18, 2.61]). Although not statistically significant, there was a trend that females who had a worse subjective health score in the early phase were more likely to have a higher risk of prolonged overweight status. Exercise habit was not associated with the risk of developing overweight status in any of the analyses.

Discussion

This study included novel, nationwide, longitudinal research on exercise habits and overweight risks in Japan during the COVID-19 pandemic. The study showed a trend of a decrease in exercise habit and increase in overweight status among a group of the population. This suggested the COVID-19 pandemic had a strong negative impact associated with a restriction of social activities. However, our research also showed that the proportion of obesity status actually decreased during the pandemic period, suggesting the impact was heterogeneous. This finding is consistent with those of previous studies [16, 17]. This may mean that targeted intervention, but not general intervention, may be required to prevent the impact of the disaster on obesity-related health outcomes. In addition, our research showed that the factors that associate with immobility and overweight status were different. Therefore intervention to prevent these two health problems might be considered independently.

Previous reports suggest that prolonged evacuation may increase the risk of chronic conditions including obesity, presumably due to increased mental stress and poor access to healthcare services [25, 26]. Our research suggests that depression and anxiety had limited impact on the health problems, suggesting there might be other cause of health deterioration during the pandemic.

Older females as a vulnerable population in the COVID-19 pandemic

Importantly, elderly females appeared to be at higher risk for both immobility and overweight status in the early phase of the pandemic. These risks also correlated with worse subjective health in females. These results suggest that this trend might be due partly to fear of COVID-19, which has been reported to be higher in females than in males [27]. In addition, the elderly population were more vulnerable to biased reports by mass media [28] and the current infodemic. Therefore, it is possible that the infodemic and other biased information exacerbated the fear elderly females had of COVID-19. This fear may be decreased by fact-checking information [27]. Indeed, in other disasters such as the Fukushima nuclear accident, public communication through the Fukushima health management surveys was effective for reducing anxiety among the residents [29]. Therefore, in future disasters, appropriate intervention in the acute phase may need to include providing the population with scientific-based information as well as information about self-management and psychological first aid targeting the elderly population.

Bipolarization of the exercise habit

Our study also showed that people who already had an exercise habit were more likely to increase their exercise. Therefore, improving this pre-condition by installing exercise habits before the pandemic in high-risk groups might be another strategy for disaster preparation.

Interestingly, our study showed that a high income (>10 million yen per year) was associated significantly with decreased exercise habits. This may mean that people engaged in administrative work or work with greater responsibility were overwhelmed by their duty during the pandemic, leading to a decrease in their exercise habit. This may also explain why males who experienced decreased income were more likely to increase their exercise habit. In other words, workload and exercise times were a trade-off in males.

On the other hand, females who experienced decreased income were more likely to also decrease their exercise, possibly because those who left their jobs did so due to increased housework [30] or those who started part-time jobs got less salary with longer worktime. Another possible reason is that female whose income decreased were more likely to become depressive. Further research is required to elucidate the reasons why exercise times in females were not a trade-off for a reduction in income.

Concern about the impact of overweight status on long-term health conditions

In addition to immobility, obesity is one of the major concerns after a huge disaster, especially among evacuees [6, 31]. Lock-down and keeping social distance may have caused the similar effects to evacuation on the public. Indeed, the present research study revealed that about 6% of non-obese males and 3% of non-obese females became overweight during the period of the pandemic. As there was a group of people whose BMI decreased, the net increase in the proportion of overweight was about 4% in males and 1% in females. Above all, middle-aged males were at higher risk of becoming overweight in both the early and late phase of the pandemic. Considering that an increased BMI in middle-age causes loss of life expectancy by 5–13 years [32], this indirect impact of the pandemic should not be ignored. Intervention in the high-risk population is therefore essential to prevent the impact of a disaster on overweight status.

Risk of overweight among males

For males, the diagnosis of COVID-19 was associated significantly with the development of overweight status. This association can be interpreted in several ways. One scenario is that COVID-19 infection may have led to overweight status. As the diagnosis also correlated with a decrease in exercise habits, this increase in overweight status may have been due to a lack of exercise. However, there was no significant difference in exercise days between those who were diagnosed with a SARS-CoV-2 infection and those who were not (Average days of exercise per week in those who were infected and those who were not were 2.30 days and 2.00 days in the early phase (p = 0.16 by t-test) and 2.43 days and 2.13 days in the late phase(p = 0.13)). Another possible reason is that post-COVID syndromes such as post-traumatic disorders, depression, and chronic fatigue may lead to inactivity, thereby increasing the risk of becoming overweight [14]. Some experts consider rehabilitation in the recovery phase of COVID-19 should include not only respiratory and cardiovascular rehabilitation but also muscle training and psychological support [33]. Such interventions may need to be applied for those whose symptoms were less severe. However, to date there are no guidelines regarding interventions for patients who were not hospitalised. An effort to reduce the indirect and prolonged health impacts caused by the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic may need to target this population.

Another scenario is that the development of overweight status has led to increase in the risk of symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection. As overweight status and obesity is a risk factor of developing severer symptoms, people in overweight status may have been at higher risks of being diagnosed as SARS-CoV-2 infection. To clarify the causal relationships, further research is required such as long-term follow-up of the infected people.

Risk of overweight status among females

Our research also revealed elderly females were at higher risk of developing overweight status in the early phase compared with the other age groups. A previous study reported homemakers were more likely to gain body weight [15], which was consistent with our findings. The factors causing overweight status in elderly people include a decrease in time spent for outings due to the geographically isolated conditions of temporary housing [34] and prolonged post-traumatic stress disorders (PTSD) [35]. During the COVID-19 pandemic, people stayed at home for a longer time, which might have caused similar conditions to long-term evacuation, such as less outings and higher mental stress. Another possible reason is change in eating habit. If people try to go out as seldom as possible, they may buy more preserved food and less fresh fruits and vegetables, which may affect body weight. However, older age confounds with a variety of socio-economic and mental status. For example, elderly people living on pensions or those with dementia may be more likely to be at poorer mental status. Further surveys on the impact of such factors on health status are required.

Overweight status in elderly women may have a marked health impact on society because being overweight in this population group is a significant risk factor for immobility and frailty, which may lead to bone fracture or a bed-ridden state [36, 37]. Therefore, immediate intervention might have been needed to target this group of people in the early phase of the pandemic. For females, the development of overweight status was associated with seemingly excessive reactions against SARS-CoV-2, such as changing clothes frequently. As bad subjective health status was associated with the risk of developing overweight status, anxiety might also have been a risk factor.

To prevent lifestyle diseases, interventions by health professionals are not sufficient. In addition, the health system is often severely compromised in the affected areas due to overwhelming demand, evacuation of healthcare workers [38], diversion of resources, and closure of health facilities [39]. Therefore, self-management such as regular exercise and weight control is a key to disaster mitigation.

Limitations

This study had several limitations. First, the study relied solely on participant responses and therefore we could not avoid false answers even after excluding those that were apparently controversial. In addition, several important questions that may affect body weight, such as eating habits, specific cause of mental stresses such as increase in housework, are not included in the questionnaire mainly due to lack of finance. The number of questionnaires was also limited to five times from the same reason. Second, although the participants were matched to the national demographic background, dropout rate was different between sexes and age groups. There also remains selection bias of the participants. For example, individuals who could not read Japanese and those who could not use the internet were excluded. In addition, individuals with a history of infection could have more actively sought to participate in our study because of their increased interest in the significance and content of this online survey, causing an upward bias in participation of this type of subject. Indeed, our data showed the proportion of those who had exercise habit of ≥ 2 days per week was higher than the that of The National Health and Nutrition Survey in Japan 2019, which may reflect these selection bias. Third, about one-third of the participants missed some of the data during the survey period. As there were some significant differences between those with missing data and those with complete data (S1 Table), these numbers may have affected the generalizability of our results. Forth, causal relationships cannot be proved by this survey. For example, it is not clear whether newly developed overweight status increased the risk of COVID-19 infection or vice-versa. By using the factors in the early phase as explanatory variables and newly developed overweight status as an outcome variable, this limitation could be partially overcome. Fifth, there are many potential confounders that were not asked in the questionnaire. For example, decrease in exercise day does not always mean decline in activity -before the pandemic the average commuting hours of Japanese businesspeople was about 50 minutes, which could be substitute for exercise time [40]. Therefore, it is possible that increase in working at home may have decreased overall activities even when the exercise day increased. Finally, the survey did not include that of genetic factors, which may account for 40 to 50% of variability in body weight status [41]. In addition, there might be difference in genetic backgrounds between Japan and other countries, which may limit the generalizability of our findings. To elucidate more detailed causal relationships, further research such as prospective study of physical performance tests and surveys including blood testing is required. However, despite these limitations, our research provided sufficient generalizability compared to other studies because of the broadness of the participants’ background.

Conclusion

This study analysed the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on exercise habit and the development of overweight status in the Japanese population. Risk factors for these conditions were shown to be different between the sexes. Our results suggest that early intervention for elderly women such as provision of information and mental care, and long-term intervention including physical and mental rehabilitation for people who were infected might have been needed during the pandemic. As most CBRNE disasters cause similar social transformation, intervention to prevent immobility and obesity among the high-risk population should be addressed in future disaster preparation/mitigation plans so that we can prevent distant health impacts associated with a disaster. Further research is still needed to clarify the detailed factors that affect exercise habits and overweight status, such as eating habits, change in the volume of housework, other causes of mental stress and genetic factors that may impact body weight status.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Background of the participants who dropped out during the surveillance period.

(DOCX)

S2 Table. Impact of the factors on prolonged overweight in the early phase of the pandemic.

(DOCX)

S1 Fig. Plot of the body mass index of each participant in October 2020 (horizontal) and October 2021 (vertical).

(TIF)

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Dr Kenzo Denda, Hiramatsu Memorial Hospital for his support in ethical considerations of the study.

Data Availability

The data used in the present study belong to the RIETI and can be obtained from the institute upon reasonable request.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by the Project Grant from the Co-creation Center for Disaster Resilience, IRIDeS, Tohoku University to SO. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Nomura S, Blangiardo M, Tsubokura M, Ozaki A, Morita T, Hodgson S. Postnuclear disaster evacuation and chronic health in adults in Fukushima, Japan: a long-term retrospective analysis. BMJ Open. 2016;6(2):e010080-e. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010080 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Satoh H, Ohira T, Hosoya M, Sakai A, Watanabe T, Ohtsuru A, et al. Evacuation after the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant Accident Is a Cause of Diabetes: Results from the Fukushima Health Management Survey. J Diabetes Res. 2015;2015:627390. Epub 2015/06/25. doi: 10.1155/2015/627390 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4461763. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Murakami M, Tsubokura M, Ono K, Nomura S, Oikawa T. Additional risk of diabetes exceeds the increased risk of cancer caused by radiation exposure after the Fukushima disaster. PloS one. 2017;12(9):e0185259-e. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185259 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ishii T, Ochi S, Tsubokura M, Kato S, Tetsuda T, Kato J, et al. Physical performance deterioration of temporary housing residents after the Great East Japan Earthquake. Prev Med Rep. 2015;2:916–9. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2015.10.009 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Yamamura E. Impact of the Fukushima nuclear accident on obesity of children in Japan (2008–2014). Econ Hum Biol. 2016;21:110–21. Epub 2016/02/06. doi: 10.1016/j.ehb.2016.01.001 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kawasaki Y, Nakano H, Hosoya M, Yasumura S, Ohira T, Satoh H, et al. Influence of post-disaster evacuation on childhood obesity and hyperlipidemia. Pediatr Int. 2020;62(6):669–76. Epub 2020/01/22. doi: 10.1111/ped.14162 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Tokunaga A, Yoshida K, Orita M, Urata H, Itagaki S, Mashiko H, et al. The mental health status of children who have been evacuated or migrated from rural areas in Fukushima prefecture after the Fukushima daiichi nuclear power station accident:results from the Fukushima health management survey. Fukushima J Med Sci. 2021;67(1):8–16. Epub 2021/02/16. doi: 10.5387/fms.2020-15 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8075557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.WHO Coronavirus (COVID-19) Dashboard: World Health Organization; 2022 [updated 1 May, 2022; cited 2022 1 May]. Available from: https://covid19.who.int/.
  • 9.Di Renzo L, Gualtieri P, Pivari F, Soldati L, Attinà A, Cinelli G, et al. Eating habits and lifestyle changes during COVID-19 lockdown: an Italian survey. Journal of translational medicine. 2020;18(1):229. Epub 2020/06/10. doi: 10.1186/s12967-020-02399-5 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7278251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Cheikh Ismail L, Osaili TM, Mohamad MN, Al Marzouqi A, Jarrar AH, Abu Jamous DO, et al. Eating Habits and Lifestyle during COVID-19 Lockdown in the United Arab Emirates: A Cross-Sectional Study. Nutrients. 2020;12(11). Epub 2020/11/04. doi: 10.3390/nu12113314 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7693610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.van Bakel BMA, Bakker EA, de Vries F, Thijssen DHJ, Eijsvogels TMH. Impact of COVID-19 lockdown on physical activity and sedentary behaviour in Dutch cardiovascular disease patients. Neth Heart J. 2021;29(5):273–9. Epub 02/25. doi: 10.1007/s12471-021-01550-1 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Yang S, Guo B, Ao L, Yang C, Zhang L, Zhou J, et al. Obesity and activity patterns before and during COVID-19 lockdown among youths in China. Clinical obesity. 2020;10(6):e12416. Epub 2020/10/04. doi: 10.1111/cob.12416 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7646045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Robinson E, Boyland E, Chisholm A, Harrold J, Maloney NG, Marty L, et al. Obesity, eating behavior and physical activity during COVID-19 lockdown: A study of UK adults. Appetite. 2021;156:104853. Epub 2020/10/11. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2020.104853 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7540284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Stefan N, Birkenfeld AL, Schulze MB. Global pandemics interconnected—obesity, impaired metabolic health and COVID-19. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2021;17(3):135–49. Epub 2021/01/23. doi: 10.1038/s41574-020-00462-1 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Caretto A, Pintus S, Petroni ML, Osella AR, Bonfiglio C, Morabito S, et al. Determinants of weight, psychological status, food contemplation and lifestyle changes in patients with obesity during the COVID-19 lockdown: a nationwide survey using multiple correspondence analysis. Int J Obes (Lond). 2022. Epub 2022/03/21. doi: 10.1038/s41366-022-01100-8 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8933751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Cancello R, Soranna D, Zambra G, Zambon A, Invitti C. Determinants of the Lifestyle Changes during COVID-19 Pandemic in the Residents of Northern Italy. International journal of environmental research and public health. 2020;17(17). Epub 2020/09/03. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17176287 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7504331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Górnicka M, Drywień ME, Zielinska MA, Hamułka J. Dietary and Lifestyle Changes During COVID-19 and the Subsequent Lockdowns among Polish Adults: A Cross-Sectional Online Survey PLifeCOVID-19 Study. Nutrients. 2020;12(8). Epub 2020/08/07. doi: 10.3390/nu12082324 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7468840. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Sekizawa Y, Hashimoto S, Denda K, Ochi S, So M. Association between COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and generalized trust, depression, generalized anxiety, and fear of COVID-19. BMC public health. 2022;22(1):126-. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-12479-w . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ochi S, So M, Hashimoto S, Denda K, Sekizawa Y. Behavioral Factors Associated with COVID-19 Risk: A Cross-Sectional Survey in Japan. International journal of environmental research and public health. 2021;18(22):12184. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182212184 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16(9):606–13. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1495268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB, Lowe B. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(10):1092–7. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Horita N, Moriguchi S. Trends in Suicide in Japan Following the 2019 Coronavirus Pandemic. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(3):e224739-e. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.4739 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Zhou Y. How Women Bear the Brunt of COVID-19’s Damage on Work. Japan Labor. 2021;5(28):7. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.MHLW. The National Health and Nutrition Survey in Japan 2019: The Japan Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare; 2019 [cited 23 1 Jun]. Available from: https://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/newpage_14156.html.
  • 25.Kadojic D, Demarin V, Kadojic M, Mihaljevic I, Barac B. Influence of prolonged stress on risk factors for cerebrovascular disease. Coll Antropol. 1999;23(1):213–9. Epub 1999/07/14. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ngaruiya C, Bernstein R, Leff R, Wallace L, Agrawal P, Selvam A, et al. Systematic review on chronic non-communicable disease in disaster settings. BMC public health. 2022;22(1):1234. Epub 2022/06/22. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13399-z ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC9210736. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Lai AY, Sit SM, Wu SY, Wang MP, Wong BY, Ho SY, et al. Associations of Delay in Doctor Consultation With COVID-19 Related Fear, Attention to Information, and Fact-Checking. Frontiers in public health. 2021;9:797814. Epub 2021/12/31. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.797814 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8710678. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Bapaye JA, Bapaye HA. Demographic Factors Influencing the Impact of Coronavirus-Related Misinformation on WhatsApp: Cross-sectional Questionnaire Study. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021;7(1):e19858. Epub 30.1.2021. doi: 10.2196/19858 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Murakami M, Sato A, Matsui S, Goto A, Kumagai A, Tsubokura M, et al. Communicating With Residents About Risks Following the Fukushima Nuclear Accident. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Health. 2017;29(2_suppl):74S–89S. doi: 10.1177/1010539516681841 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Sakuragi T, Tanaka R, Tsuji M, Tateishi S, Hino A, Ogami A, et al. Gender differences in housework and childcare among Japanese workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Occup Health. 2022;64(1):e12339. Epub 2022/07/06. doi: 10.1002/1348-9585.12339 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Uemura MY, Ohira T, Yasumura S, Sakai A, Takahashi A, Hosoya M, et al. Association between lifestyle habits and the prevalence of abdominal obesity after the Great East Japan Earthquake: The Fukushima Health Management Survey. J Epidemiol. 2021. Epub 2021/04/06. doi: 10.2188/jea.JE20200597 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Peeters A, Barendregt JJ, Willekens F, Mackenbach JP, Al Mamun A, Bonneux L. Obesity in adulthood and its consequences for life expectancy: a life-table analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138(1):24–32. Epub 2003/01/07. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-138-1-200301070-00008 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Barker-Davies RM, O’Sullivan O, Senaratne KPP, Baker P, Cranley M, Dharm-Datta S, et al. The Stanford Hall consensus statement for post-COVID-19 rehabilitation. Br J Sports Med. 2020;54(16):949–59. Epub 2020/06/02. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2020-102596 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7418628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Hikichi H, Aida J, Kondo K, Tsuboya T, Kawachi I. Residential relocation and obesity after a natural disaster: A natural experiment from the 2011 Japan Earthquake and Tsunami. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):374. Epub 2019/01/25. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-36906-y ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6344590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Takemoto E, Van Oss KR, Chamany S, Brite J, Brackbill R. Post-traumatic stress disorder and the association with overweight, obesity, and weight change among individuals exposed to the World Trade Center disaster, 2003–2016. Psychological Medicine. 2021;51(15):2647–56. Epub 2020/05/07. doi: 10.1017/S0033291720001208 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Schaap LA, Koster A, Visser M. Adiposity, muscle mass, and muscle strength in relation to functional decline in older persons. Epidemiol Rev. 2013;35:51–65. Epub 2012/12/12. doi: 10.1093/epirev/mxs006 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Strandberg TE, Sirola J, Pitkala KH, Tilvis RS, Strandberg AY, Stenholm S. Association of midlife obesity and cardiovascular risk with old age frailty: a 26-year follow-up of initially healthy men. Int J Obes (Lond). 2012;36(9):1153–7. Epub 2012/05/23. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2012.83 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Ochi S, Tsubokura M, Kato S, Iwamoto S, Ogata S, Morita T, et al. Hospital Staff Shortage after the 2011 Triple Disaster in Fukushima, Japan-An Earthquake, Tsunamis, and Nuclear Power Plant Accident: A Case of the Soso District. PLoS One. 2016;11(10):e0164952. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164952 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5082811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Ochi S, Leppold C, Kato S. Impacts of the 2011 Fukushima nuclear disaster on healthcare facilities: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. 2020;42:101350. 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101350. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Morikawa M. Long Commuting Time and the Benefits of Telecommuting.: Research Institute of Economy, Trade, and Industry (RIETI); 2018 [cited 2023 16 April]. Available from: https://www.rieti.go.jp/jp/publications/dp/18e025.pdf.
  • 41.Bouchard C. Genetics of Obesity: What We Have Learned Over Decades of Research. Obesity (Silver Spring, Md). 2021;29(5):802–20. Epub 2021/04/27. doi: 10.1002/oby.23116 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
PLOS Glob Public Health. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001732.r001

Decision Letter 0

Collins Otieno Asweto

27 Mar 2023

PGPH-D-23-00212

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on exercise habits and overweight in Japan: a nation-wide panel survey

PLOS Global Public Health

Dear Ochi,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS Global Public Health. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS Global Public Health’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by 27th April 2023. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at globalpubhealth@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pgph/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Collins Otieno Asweto, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS Global Public Health

Journal Requirements:

1. We suggest you thoroughly copyedit your manuscript for language usage, spelling, and grammar. If you do not know anyone who can help you do this, you may wish to consider employing a professional scientific editing service.

Whilst you may use any professional scientific editing service of your choice, PLOS has partnered with both American Journal Experts (AJE) and Editage to provide discounted services to PLOS authors. Both organizations have experience helping authors meet PLOS guidelines and can provide language editing, translation, manuscript formatting, and figure formatting to ensure your manuscript meets our submission guidelines. To take advantage of our partnership with AJE, visit the AJE website (http://learn.aje.com/plos/) for a 15% discount off AJE services. To take advantage of our partnership with Editage, visit the Editage website (www.editage.com) and enter referral code PLOSEDIT for a 15% discount off Editage services. If the PLOS editorial team finds any language issues in text that either AJE or Editage has edited, the service provider will re-edit the text for free.

Upon resubmission, please provide the following:

- The name of the colleague or the details of the professional service that edited your manuscript

- A copy of your manuscript showing your changes by either highlighting them or using track changes (uploaded as a *supporting information* file)

- A clean copy of the edited manuscript (uploaded as the new *manuscript* file)

2. Please send a completed 'Competing Interests' statement, including any COIs declared by your co-authors. If you have no competing interests to declare, please state "The authors have declared that no competing interests exist". Otherwise please declare all competing interests beginning with the statement "I have read the journal's policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests:"

3. Please provide a/amend your detailed Financial Disclosure statement. This is published with the article. It must therefore be completed in full sentences and contain the exact wording you wish to be published.

a. Please clarify all sources of funding (financial or material support) for your study. List the grants (with grant number) or organizations (with url) that supported your study, including funding received from your institution. 

b. State the initials, alongside each funding source, of each author to receive each grant.

c. State what role the funders took in the study. If the funders had no role in your study, please state: “The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.”

4. Please provide separate figure files in .tif or .eps format.

For more information about figure files please see our guidelines: 

https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/s/figures 

https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/s/figures#loc-file-requirements

5. We noticed that you used “data not shown”/"unpublished data" in the manuscript. We do not allow these references, as the PLOS data access policy requires that all data be either published with the manuscript or made available in a publicly accessible database. Please amend the supplementary material to include the referenced data or remove the references.

6. Since your data is not available for proprietary reasons, please explain via email why the data is not available. Please also include the contact information for the third party organization that should be contacted should other researchers want to request access to this data and please include the full citation of where the data can be found. We also request that you verify with us via email that any researcher will be able to obtain the data set in the same manner that the you have obtained it. If you feel you are unwilling or unable to adhere to this policy, please explain your reasons by return email and your exemption request will be escalated to the editor for approval. Your exemption request will be handled independently and will not hold up the peer review process, but will need to be resolved should your manuscript be accepted for publication. One of the Editorial team will be in touch if they require more information.

7. We have noticed that you have uploaded Supporting Information files, but you have not included a list of legends. Please add a full list of legends for your Supporting Information files after the references list.  

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Does this manuscript meet PLOS Global Public Health’s publication criteria? Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions? The manuscript must describe methodologically and ethically rigorous research with conclusions that are appropriately drawn based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Partly

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: I don't know

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available (please refer to the Data Availability Statement at the start of the manuscript PDF file)?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception. The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS Global Public Health does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Interesting and important topic

Well justified

Methodology is clear

Clear table and presentation of data

Minor Edits:

- Not clear how the COVID-19 pandemic falls under the definition of CBRNE. Perhaps there is no need to put it under this category as it becomes vague and inaccurate.

- make it more clear regarding correlation and not causation (use correlation instead of may cause), and add more on that in the limitations section.

-Add what further studies are recommended to investigate this correlation/causation further - in the conclusion section.

-In discussion : add more on role of possible confounding factors that are missed in this study (e.g. eating habits).

Reviewer #2: Thank you very much. I have enjoyed reading the article. It is always great to have numbers to support the personal observations.

The methodology is clear with the suitable exclusion criteria, proper analysis and presentation of findings.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLOS Glob Public Health. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001732.r003

Decision Letter 1

Collins Otieno Asweto

31 May 2023

PGPH-D-23-00212R1

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on exercise habits and overweight status in Japan: a nation-wide panel survey

PLOS Global Public Health

Dear Sae,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS Global Public Health. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS Global Public Health’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please ensure that your decision is justified on PLOS Global Public Health’s publication criteria and not, for example, on novelty or perceived impact.

Please submit your revised manuscript by 14th June 2023. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at globalpubhealth@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pgph/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Collins Otieno Asweto, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS Global Public Health

Journal Requirements:

1. Please submit a copy edited of your manuscript.

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Additional Editor Comments (if provided):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #3: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Does this manuscript meet PLOS Global Public Health’s publication criteria? Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions? The manuscript must describe methodologically and ethically rigorous research with conclusions that are appropriately drawn based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available (please refer to the Data Availability Statement at the start of the manuscript PDF file)?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception. The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS Global Public Health does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Comments have been appropriately addressed

Reviewer #3: IMPACT OF THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC ON EXERCISE HABITS AND OVERWEIGHT STATUS IN JAPAN: A NATION-WIDE PANEL SURVEY.

This research by Sae Ochi et al, aimed to analyse the association of the COVID-19 PANDEMIC with lifestyle factors of exercise habits and overweight status in the Japanese population.

The study deployed online nation wide questionnaire which were administered five times between October 2020 and October 2021. The changes were compared between the first questionnaire and the later questionnaire. Analysis of the risk factors for losing exercise habit or becoming overweight were done using multiple regression. The findings suggest that the risks for immobility and overweight are homogeneous.

COMMENTS:

The authors did a fantastic job by painstakingly looking at the health impacts of Covid 19 on lifestyle changes such as exercise habits and overweight weight status of the Japanese population. The results of this study will surely provide adequate insights on the health impacts of the Covid-19 pandemic.

1. The title is adequate and the abstract gave a good summary of what was done with essential information required.

Line 7: under abstract : "compared between the first and later questionnaire": this appear vague, the authors should clarify the term "later questionnaire" specifically for easy reference.

2. Data presented and analyzed in this study were post-covid , a brief background introductory information on the pre-covid lifestyle factors of exercise habits and overweight status among Japanese population would give readers a more robust understanding of the impact of this study. The authors may wish to consider this.

3. MATERIALS AND METHODS:

Line 7 : Online questionnaire were conducted five times.

Why five times? What was the rationale for this? Were the same questions administered five times on the same or different populations? How was the baseline data determined? Were there pre and post data comparison? Which of these represented the baseline/pre and post data collected? The authors may wish to clarify all these for easy comprehension.

4. DEFINITION OF CHANGES IN THE EARLY AND LATE PHASES

Line 3: Reference was made to first, second and fifth questionnaire.

Was there a third and fourth questionnaire?

If the questionnaires were administered five times, an explanation or reference may be included in the study for third and fourth questionnaire.

5. TARGET POPULATION

Line 14 & 15: mentions selection of target population from the database, was there a scientific determination for this selection? How did you arrive at a sample size of 2000 for the study ( line 17). A simple clarification will be fine.

6. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS.

The statistical tools of analysis deployed by the authors were in harmony with the data presented and this produced an incisive outlook of the research aims.

7. In addition to some risk factors mentioned, genetics is another major risk factor in being overweight.

The authors may wish to list out all the possible risk factors for being overweight but clarify that the focus of this study is on the impact of covid-19 pandemic.

8. The massive work done by these authors are very commendable. This research is unique and interesting with a lot of information that will be added to the body of knowledge.

Conclusion: The authors have addressed the concerns raised by the editor and previous reviewer. They may wish to address these fresh concerns I have raised. However, this research is massive and the authors have done a commendable work.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #3: Yes: PRISCILIA UHUANMWEN IMADE

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLOS Glob Public Health. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001732.r005

Decision Letter 2

Collins Otieno Asweto

28 Jun 2023

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on exercise habits and overweight status in Japan: a nation-wide panel survey

PGPH-D-23-00212R2

Dear Ochi,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript 'Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on exercise habits and overweight status in Japan: a nation-wide panel survey' has been provisionally accepted for publication in PLOS Global Public Health.

Before your manuscript can be formally accepted you will need to complete some formatting changes, which you will receive in a follow up email. A member of our team will be in touch with a set of requests.

Please note that your manuscript will not be scheduled for publication until you have made the required changes, so a swift response is appreciated.

IMPORTANT: The editorial review process is now complete. PLOS will only permit corrections to spelling, formatting or significant scientific errors from this point onwards. Requests for major changes, or any which affect the scientific understanding of your work, will cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact globalpubhealth@plos.org.

Thank you again for supporting Open Access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Global Public Health.

Best regards,

Collins Otieno Asweto, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS Global Public Health

***********************************************************

Reviewer Comments (if any, and for reference):

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #4: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #5: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Does this manuscript meet PLOS Global Public Health’s publication criteria? Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions? The manuscript must describe methodologically and ethically rigorous research with conclusions that are appropriately drawn based on the data presented.

Reviewer #4: Yes

Reviewer #5: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #4: Yes

Reviewer #5: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available (please refer to the Data Availability Statement at the start of the manuscript PDF file)?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception. The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #4: Yes

Reviewer #5: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS Global Public Health does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #4: Yes

Reviewer #5: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #4: Given the sporadic nature of various disasters, the study provides important information that need to be taken on board as part of disaster preparedness and control.

The information was truly presented in an intelligent and coherent manner.

The methods were detailed and clear.

Results: It is important to format a table 2. As it stands, N could be interpreted as people who also dropped out which is not the case here. Aligning the N and its % is recommended.

Ethics consideration: it is important to highlight how ethical issues like confidentiality were handled

Reviewer #5: Table 2 on the drop out rates needs further explanation. The rates in percentage appear to be disproportionate to the actual numbers (N) shown. Perhaps a few sentences explaining this Table will be in order

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #4: No

Reviewer #5: Yes: Lakshmi Narasimhan Balaji

**********

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Table. Background of the participants who dropped out during the surveillance period.

    (DOCX)

    S2 Table. Impact of the factors on prolonged overweight in the early phase of the pandemic.

    (DOCX)

    S1 Fig. Plot of the body mass index of each participant in October 2020 (horizontal) and October 2021 (vertical).

    (TIF)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: ResponseToReviewersR1.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: RebuttalLetterR2.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    The data used in the present study belong to the RIETI and can be obtained from the institute upon reasonable request.


    Articles from PLOS Global Public Health are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES