Skip to main content
BMJ Paediatrics Open logoLink to BMJ Paediatrics Open
. 2023 Jul 19;7(1):e002002. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2023-002002

Inborn errors of immunity in mainland China: the past, present and future

Mengyue Deng 1, Huawei Mao 1,2,
PMCID: PMC10357751  PMID: 37474202

Abstract

Inborn errors of immunity (IEI), also known as primary immunodeficiency diseases, comprise a group of rare genetic disorders that affect the development or/and function of the immune system. These disorders predispose individuals to recurrent infections, autoimmunity, cancer and immune dysregulations. The field of IEI diagnosis and treatment in mainland China has made significant strides in recent years due to advances in genome sequencing, genetics, immunology and treatment strategies. However, the accessibility and affordability of diagnostic facilities and precision treatments remain variable among different regions. With the increasing government emphasis on rare disease prevention, diagnosis, and treatment, the field of IEI is expected to progress further in mainland China. Herein, we reviewed the development and current state of IEI in mainland China, highlighting the achievements made, as well as opportunities and challenges that lie ahead.

Keywords: adolescent health

Introduction

Inborn errors of immunity (IEI), also known as primary immunodeficiency diseases, are a group of genetic disorders resulting from mutations in various genes essential for the development or/and function of the immune system.1 These disorders predispose affected individuals to recurrent infections, autoimmunity, cancer and other immune dysregulations.1 IEI, estimated to affect 1% of the global population,2 with approximately 14 million cases in mainland China, have become a challenging public health issue.

IEI have rapidly developed in mainland China over the past two decades, primarily due to advances in genome sequencing, genetics, immunology and molecular biology. The combination of high-throughput sequencing and functional validation has enabled more patients to receive accurate genetic diagnoses.3–10 A comprehensive understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying IEI has laid the groundwork for the clinical application of molecular targeted therapies.11 12 Moreover, gene therapy is emerging as a promising curative treatment strategy for IEI, in addition to allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT).

Despite these advances in diagnosis and treatment, challenges remain. For example, the lack of a national newborn screening (NBS) programme leads to delayed diagnosis, severe complications and adverse reactions to vaccines in some types of IEIs.13–15 In addition, although there is a relatively large number of patients with IEI, the discovery of novel disease-causing genes in mainland China lags behind that of developed countries.1 6 Herein, we reviewed the development and current state of IEI in mainland China, highlighting the achievements made, as well as the opportunities and challenges that lie ahead.

The history and development

In the 1960s, a few cases potentially related to IEI were reported in mainland China.16 In the early 1980s, Dr Feng, a researcher at Beijing Children’s Hospital, successively reported congenital thymic dysplasia and combined immunodeficiency disease.17 18 These pivotal findings marked the initial recognition of IEI within the medical community of mainland China. In 1998, the Chinese Pediatric Immunology Society established screening and diagnostic procedures, as well as a collaborative network comprising 14 specialist centres for IEI, in addition to an IEI patient registration system.16 19 From then on, regular meetings and training courses have been organised to enhance the knowledge, skills and practice of clinicians in the field of IEI. Several centres have retrospectively analysed the diagnosis of various types of IEIs, with the majority of patients being diagnosed based on clinical manifestations and immunological tests.20–24 Among them, antibody deficiency has been reported to be the most common IEI.20–24

Over the past two decades, especially with the introduction of next-generation sequencing in clinical diagnostics in mainland China, patients with IEI have gained earlier access to genetic diagnoses and precision therapies. A study summarising results from seven cities in mainland China revealed an estimated IEI prevalence of approximately 2 in 1 million, of which nearly half of patients remain genetically undiagnosed.3 This may be attributed to the wide variation in the accessibility and affordability of diagnostic facilities among different regions, potentially leading to an underestimation of the actual prevalence. Additionally, an increasing number of single-centre studies have reported a couple of cohorts of monogenic IEI, including X-linked agammaglobulinemia (XLA),25 26 hyper-IgM syndrome (HIM),27–29 chronic granulomatous disease (CGD),30–32 Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome (WAS),33 severe combined immunodeficiency disease (SCID)34 35 and adenosine deaminase deficiency.10 In 2018, mainland China reported for the first time a new IEI-causing gene, RASGRP1, which leads to the development of autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome-like disease.6 Subsequently, several rare IEI types with novel mutations in known genes were reported.7 36 As for treatment, in addition to previous symptomatic strategies, numerous specialist centres have conducted successful transplantations for different types of IEIs, such as SCID, HIM, WAS, CGD and X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis (XIAP) deficiency.37–41 Currently, dedicated HSCT centres for IEI have been established in Beijing, Shanghai and Chongqing as core locations.

In recent years, the Chinese government has increasingly emphasised the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of rare diseases. To this end, China’s First National List of Rare Diseases, which includes XLA, combined immune deficiency, WAS, familial Mediterranean fever, severe congenital neutropenia and X-linked lymphoproliferative syndrome, was published in 2018.42 This important initiative aims to raise awareness of rare diseases among clinicians and the public, and promote genetic screening for rare disease. Furthermore, the Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Rare Diseases, including the afore-mentioned IEIs, were developed in 2019 to standardise the diagnosis and treatment procedures.43 The first National Congress of IEI was successfully held in 2022, fostering knowledge exchange and collaboration. These efforts are expected to further advance the development of precision diagnoses and treatments for IEI.

Prevention and screening

Patients with IEI often remain undiagnosed during the early stages, resulting in missed opportunities for optimal treatment. Delayed diagnosis or unidentified cases of IEI may lead to recurrent infections, severe complications and even premature death. Furthermore, repeated hospitalisations result in substantial medical expenses and increase the mental and economic burden on patients and their families. Prenatal diagnosis or NBS can identify IEIs in fetuses or newborns, thereby facilitating early diagnosis and intervention, which are crucial strategies for IEI management.

Prenatal diagnosis

In mainland China, some hospitals have established genetic counselling departments to provide families, particularly those with a family history, with genetic counselling for IEI. Currently, available techniques for prenatal diagnosis of IEI include chorionic villus biopsy, amniocentesis, cordocentesis and non-invasive prenatal testing. These methods analyse fetal DNA to identify genetic mutations associated with IEI. Several studies have reported successful cases of prenatal diagnoses using these approaches, such as CGD,32 44 45 WAS,46 SCID,35 XLA47 and XLP.48 Nevertheless, certain invasive techniques carry risks of miscarriage. Additionally, clinical decisions-making based on genetic test results can be complex. Therefore, the ethical issue associated with prenatal diagnosis is a concern.

Newborn screening

Early screening of newborns not only improves diagnostic rates and outcomes for IEI but also helps avoid vaccine-related adverse events for several IEI entities.13–15 The maturation processes of T cells and B cells produce T-cell receptor excision circles (TRECs) and kappa-deleting recombination excision circles, respectively, which can be used for newborn screening of congenital T cell or/and B cell deficiencies.

SCID, characterised by a deficiency in T cells, is often fatal within the first year of life. NBS facilitates the early detection of SCID and the initiation of HSCT, resulting in improved long-term survival rates and enhanced quality of life.49 NBS for SCID has been implemented in the USA and several European countries.50–54 Given that approximately one patient with SCID can be found per 33 000 neonates,50 it is estimated that roughly 450 out of the 15 million newborns annually in mainland China may be afflicted with SCID. Consequently, NBS for SCID can significantly contribute to early diagnosis and timely initiation of HSCT. At present, several hospitals have commenced pilot projects for TREC NBS. It is anticipated that NBS for SCID will be increasingly implemented across a greater number of cities to improve the overall effectiveness of early detection and treatment.

In addition, Beijing Children’s Hospital is spearheading a multicentre clinical study based on targeted sequencing, which is aimed at 465 disease-causative genes, covering IEI-related genes such as XLA, WAS, CGD, among others.55 Preliminary findings suggest that this research could become a first-tier NBS programme, potentially revolutionising the current state of NBS in mainland China.55

Diagnosis

The International Union of Immunological Societies has described 485 IEIs.56 Despite recent advances in immunology and genetic analysis, diagnosis remains a formidable challenge due to the phenotypic and genotypic heterogeneity of IEI. In mainland China, the diagnostic rate of IEI is merely about 5%,57 potentially attributable to a deficit of expertise among clinicians and a shortage of genetic testing and diagnostic facilities. Table 1 lists the diagnostic tests for IEI that are generally accessible in hospitals across various tiers in mainland China.

Table 1.

Diagnostic test and treatment available for IEI patients in mainland China

Hospital level Diagnostic test Treatment
Primary CBC and differentials Antimicrobials
Secondary In addition to the above:
Immunoglobulin levels (IgG, IgA, IgM, IgE)
Antimicrobials
Intravenous IG
Tertiary (General) In addition to the above:
1. C3, C4, CH50, AH50
2. Specific antibody response
3. Basic lymphocyte subset analysis (CD3, CD4, CD8, CD19, CD20, CD16, CD56)
4. Cytokine production (eg, IL-6, TNF-α, IL-8)
5. Genetic testing (eg, TES, WES, WGS)
Antimicrobials
Intravenous IG
HSCT
Tertiary (IEI Specialised) Besides the above, including but not limited to the following:
1. Comprehensive lymphocyte subset analysis
2. Lymphocyte proliferation
3. TREC qPCR
4. Granulocyte function tests (eg, dihydrorhodamine test, nitroblue tetrazolium test)
5. NK cytotoxicity studies
6. Specific protein levels (eg, WASp, BTK)
7. Pathway function (eg, JAK-STAT, NF-κB)
Antimicrobials
IVIG
Biologics
Targeted therapy
HSCT

BTK, Bruton tyrosine kinase; CBC, complete blood count; HSCT, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; IG, immunoglobulin G; IL, interleukin; NF-κB, nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells; qPCR, quantitative polymerase chain reaction; TES, targeted exome sequencing; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor alpha; TREC, T-cell receptor excision circle; WASp, Wiskott–Aldrich Syndrome protein; WES, whole exome sequencing; WGS, whole genome sequencing.

Biological tests

When a patient is suspected of having IEI, an initial clinical evaluation is commonly performed in many tertiary hospitals, followed by an immunological assessment tailored to the suspected IEI subtype. This assessment typically includes evaluating the absolute numbers and percentages of basic lymphocyte subsets, immunoglobulins levels and cytokine detection. In specialist centres, additional tests may also be conducted, such as comprehensive lymphocyte subset analysis, lymphocyte proliferation and granulocyte function tests among others. Collectively, these biological tests are essential for understanding the underlying immunological abnormalities and guiding further genetic testing and appropriate management strategies.

Genome sequencing and functional validation

The advent of next-generation sequencing technologies, including targeted exome sequencing (TES), whole-exome sequencing (WES) and whole-genome sequencing (WGS), has broadened accessibility in commercial laboratories across mainland China. These technologies are extensively used for molecular diagnosis in patients with suspected IEI.58 TES is the most efficient and cost-effective approach when the clinical phenotype and genetic pattern suggest a potential causative gene for IEI. If TES is inconclusive, WES and WGS can be used for further screening, potentially revealing mutations in unknown IEI-causing genes.

Nonetheless, establishing a clear relationship between the candidate disease-causing genes and the complex IEI phenotypes often remains a challenge. Consequently, thorough functional experiments are required to verify that the identified variants cause changes in the associated pathways and phenotypes. For instance, novel compound heterozygous missense mutations in IL-10R1 were discovered in a patient with neonatal-onset Crohn’s disease.4 Functional studies indicated that the mutation impaired interleukin (IL)-10-induced IL-10R1 phosphorylation, subsequently impairing STAT3 activation and the suppression of inflammatory responses.4 In children with Penicillium marneffei infection, STAT1 gain-of-function (GOF) mutations were detected, with functional experiments indicating enhanced phosphorylation of STAT1 and impaired IFN-γ and IL-17 responses.5 Additionally, in a case involving two siblings, a novel IEI-causing gene, RASGRP1, causing autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome-like disease was identified.6 The functional experiments suggested defective T-cell activation and proliferation, along with impaired activation-induced cell death of T cells.6 In another case, a novel heterozygous missense mutation of NLRC4 was detected in a patient with mild autoinflammation and recurrent urticaria, with functional studies indicating markedly elevated production of IL-1β and IL-6.7 Furthermore, a novel STAT3 GOF mutation was identified in a patient with infancy-onset interstitial lung disease.8 The functional tests suggested enhanced phosphorylation and transcriptional activity of STAT3.8 Additionally, two novel mutations in NLRP12 were identified in patients with autoinflammatory diseases.9 Functional experiments suggested elevated levels of IL-1β, IL-6 and tumor necrosis factor alpha, as well as increased transcriptional activity of nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells.9 These findings underscore the importance of genetic testing combined with functional validation to establish the associations between disease-causing genes and their corresponding disease phenotypes.

Treatment

The primary treatment options for IEI include replacement therapy and HSCT. In recent years, with a better understanding of gene function and disease pathogenesis, precision therapy, such as small molecule drugs targeting mutant proteins or signalling pathways, has been increasingly applied in clinical practice. Moreover, gene therapy is emerging as a promising new approach to compensate for or correct IEI caused by gene defects and abnormalities. Table 1 lists the IEI treatments generally available in hospitals of various tiers in mainland China.

Immunoglobulin G replacement therapy

The regular administration of immunoglobulin G (IgG) replacement therapy is an essential pharmacological treatment for most patients with primary antibody deficiency (PAD). The primary goal is to prevent severe infections and maintain patients’ quality of life.59 As of 2017, intravenous IG for PAD was included in health insurance coverage in mainland China, with a reimbursement ratio of no less than 70%,60 thereby reducing the financial burden on families. In 2019, an expert consensus was developed concerning IgG replacement therapy for IEI, with the objective of promoting the standardisation of IgG replacement therapy.61 Given that IgG replacement therapy constitutes lifelong treatment for patients with IEI, factors such as tolerance, medication compliance and quality of life are essential considerations. Intravenous IG may cause numerous adverse effects, whereas subcutaneous IG (SCIG) is associated with fewer side effects, increased convenience, lower costs and improved quality of life. Therefore, SCIG has become the standard treatment for patients with PAD in Europe and the USA.62 63 Currently, a phase III clinical trial of SCIG replacement therapy is ongoing in mainland China for IEI patients with PAD.

Haematopoietic stem cell transplantation

HSCT is a cure for numerous IEIs. However, due to the varying mechanisms and phenotypes of IEI, formulating a standard approach to HSCT remains challenging. In fact, as far back as 1991, Professor Lu successfully carried out HSCT on a patient with XLA deficiency.64 In recent years, an increasing number of tertiary centres have performed HSCT for IEIs such as SCID, HIM, WAS, CGD and XIAP deficiency.37–41 A retrospective study conducted by the Shanghai Children’s Medical Center showed that the 2-year overall survival (OS) rate was 78.7% among 47 patients with IEI who underwent allogeneic HSCT between 2013 and 2018.37 The Children’s Hospital of Chongqing Medical University has also performed over ten different types of IEI for HSCT, with notable outcomes such as a 5-year OS rate of 84% for patients with WAS between 2007 and 2017,38 an 18-month OS rate of 86.4% for patients with CGD from 2012 to 2018,39 and a 2-year OS rate of 82.35% in patients with HIM from 2009 to 2019.40 Importantly, in an intensive care unit, Beijing Children’s Hospital successfully performed a conditioning-free HSCT for an SCID patient with life-threatening infection, providing a treatment opportunity for critically ill patients.65

Targeted molecular therapies

The advances in understanding of the mechanisms underlying immune deficiencies have facilitated the development of targeted therapies, such as small-molecule drugs or monoclonal antibodies. These therapies have been designed to specifically target proteins or immune signalling pathways involved in the pathogenesis of IEI. Recently, small molecule targeted therapies, as a new approach in IEI treatment, have been increasingly employed in mainland China. Patients with lipopolysaccharide responsive beige-like anchor protein or cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 deficiency, who presented with chronic diarrhoea, recurrent infections, hypogammaglobulinemia, diminished regulatory T cells and increased circulating follicular helper T (cTfh) cells, showed significant improvements in controlling enteropathy and a noticeable decrease in the frequency of cTfh cells following treatment with abatacept.11 A patient with sideroblastic anaemia, immunodeficiency, periodic fevers and developmental delay demonstrated a good response to thalidomide in terms of down-regulation of inflammatory responses.12 A patient with STAT3 GOF disease showed significant improvements in rash, asthma and symptoms of pulmonary hypertension after being treated with ruxolitinib (unpublished data). Sirolimus also demonstrated significant efficacy in alleviating the symptoms of patients with activated PI3K syndrome (unpublished data). Taken together, these pioneering interventions highlight the potential of targeted therapies for improved clinical outcomes in mainland China in the future.

Gene therapy

In recent years, significant advances have been made in the field of gene therapy, making it a potentially curative treatment for IEI. Gene therapy for IEI involves the introduction of a functional copy of the defective gene either via gene addition or gene editing methodologies to ameliorate the disease. Retrovirus-based vectors and CRISPR/Cas9-based gene editing techniques have been successfully employed in human gene therapy to correct IEI.66 In mainland China, gene therapy for IEI is on the way of preclinical research stages in certain hospitals and research institutions. The initiation of clinical trials for gene therapy in IEI is eagerly anticipated, and it is expected that there will be commercialised gene therapy products that will benefit patients with IEI.

Future challenges and opportunities

Despite the significant progress made in the diagnosis and treatment of IEI in mainland China over recent decades, several challenges exist. In terms of diagnosis, numerous factors can lead to delayed referral of patients to tertiary hospitals or institutions capable of diagnosing IEI, such as a lack of adept primary care clinicians capable of promptly identifying IEI, and a generally low level of public awareness about IEI, inclusive of patients and their family members. Moreover, even if a IEI are suspected, the availability of diagnostic facilities may be limited in remote areas. Also, in cases where genetic sequencing is accessible, there might be a deficiency in the authoritative interpretation of novel variations in known or unknown genes. Additionally, the lack of NBS results in missed optimal treatment opportunities for some patients. With regard to treatment, a significant number of patients with IEI require multiple episodes of hospitalisation and extended stays prior to a clear diagnosis.60 Furthermore, the median annual cost of patient hospitalisation account for over 40% of total household consumption expenditure, consequently posing a significant financial burden.60

Given that mainland China constitutes approximately 18% of the global population, there would be a substantial number of patients with IEI. This provides a unique opportunity for discovering novel disease-causing genes and developing effective treatments through clinical trials. For the advances in the field of IEI, several measures need to be taken. First, medical education should be promoted among primary care clinicians to enhance their abilities in identifying and referring complicated cases of IEI. Training courses are also necessary for the specialists to ensure accurate diagnosis and treatment of IEIs. In addition, national and international multicentre collaborations will enable the sharing of experiences and contribute to progress in the field. Furthermore, enormous efforts are needed for the application of newborn screening, identification of novel IEI-causative genes, clarification of underlying disease mechanism and development of new drugs and treatment modalities. By implementing these measures, significant improvement can be made in the diagnosis and treatment of IEIs, thereby advancing this field in mainland China.

Supplementary Material

Reviewer comments
Author's manuscript

Footnotes

Contributors: MD was responsible for the conceptualisation of the article and drafted the initial manuscript. HM provided guidance for the article, added insights and contributed valuable information to the original manuscript, culminating in the finalisation of the article.

Funding: This work was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81971547), Beijing Hospitals Authority’s Ascent Plan (DFL20221001), R&D Program of Beijing Municipal Education Commission (KZ202210025030), National Key Research and Development Program of China (2021YFC2702005) and Wu Jieping Medical Foundation (320.6750.2022-03-53).

Competing interests: There is no COI to disclose.

Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Ethics statements

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

References

  • 1.Tangye SG, Al-Herz W, Bousfiha A, et al. Human inborn errors of immunity: 2022 update on the classification from the International Union of immunological societies expert committee. J Clin Immunol 2022;42:1473–507. 10.1007/s10875-022-01289-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Quinn J, Modell V, Orange JS, et al. Growth in diagnosis and treatment of primary immunodeficiency within the global Jeffrey Modell centers network. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol 2022;18:1–19. 10.1186/s13223-022-00662-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Xia Y, He T, Luo Y, et al. Targeted Next‐Generation sequencing for genetic diagnosis of 160 patients with primary immunodeficiency in South China. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2018;29:863–72. 10.1111/pai.12976 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Mao H, Yang W, Lee PPW, et al. Exome sequencing identifies novel compound heterozygous mutations of IL-10 receptor 1 in neonatal-onset Crohn’s disease. Genes Immun 2012;13:437–42. 10.1038/gene.2012.8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Lee PPW, Mao H, Yang W, et al. Penicillium Marneffei infection and impaired IFN-Γ immunity in humans with Autosomal-dominant gain-of-Phosphorylation Stat1 mutations. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2014;133:894–6. 10.1016/j.jaci.2013.08.051 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Mao H, Yang W, Latour S, et al. Rasgrp1 Mutation in autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome-like disease. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2018;142:595–604. 10.1016/j.jaci.2017.10.026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wang L, Wen W, Deng M, et al. A novel Mutation in the NBD domain of Nlrc4 causes mild Autoinflammation with recurrent urticaria. Front Immunol 2021;12:674808. 10.3389/fimmu.2021.674808 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Deng M, Li Y, Li Y, et al. A novel Stat3 gain-of-function Mutation in fatal infancy-onset interstitial lung disease. Front Immunol 2022;13:13. 10.3389/fimmu.2022.866638 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Li Y, Deng M, Li Y, et al. Clinical heterogeneity of Nlrp12-associated Autoinflammatory diseases. Genes & Diseases 2023;10:1090–100. 10.1016/j.gendis.2022.05.012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Zhang Y, Liu W, Shu Z, et al. Delayed-onset adenosine Deaminase deficiency with a novel synonymous Mutation and a case series from China. World J Pediatr 2023;19:687–700. 10.1007/s12519-023-00729-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Yang L, Xue X, Chen X, et al. Abatacept is effective in Chinese patients with LRBA and Ctla4 deficiency. Genes & Diseases 2021;8:662–8. 10.1016/j.gendis.2020.03.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Li Y, Deng M, Han T, et al. Thalidomide as an effective treatment in Sideroblastic anemia, immunodeficiency, periodic fevers, and developmental delay (SIFD). J Clin Immunol 2023;43:780–93. 10.1007/s10875-023-01441-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Fekrvand S, Yazdani R, Olbrich P, et al. Primary immunodeficiency diseases and Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG)-Vaccine-derived complications: A systematic review. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 2020;8:1371–86. 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.01.038 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Macklin G, Diop OM, Humayun A, et al. Update on immunodeficiency-associated vaccine-derived Polioviruses—worldwide. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2018;69:913–7. 10.15585/mmwr.mm6928a4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Zeng Y, Ying W, Wang W, et al. Clinical and genetic characteristics of BCG disease in Chinese children: A retrospective study. J Clin Immunol 2023;43:756–68. 10.1007/s10875-022-01422-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Yang X, Zhao X. Current status and prospect of primary immunodeficiency disease in China. Chinese J Pract Pediatr 2011;26:801–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Feng L, Teng Q, Li P, et al. Three cases of combined immunodeficiency disease. Chinese Journal of Medicine 1980;11. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Feng L, Teng Q, Liu S, et al. Two cases of congenital Thymic dysplasia. Beijing Med J 1981;4. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ying D, Wang X, Yang X, et al. Collaborative network and registration work for primary immunodeficiency diseases. Chinese J Pediat 1999;06:7–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Chen X, Zeng H, Wei R. Clinical features and genetic analysis in 110 children with primary immunodeficiency. Guangdong Med J 2010;31:28–31. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Liu Y, Liu G, Jiang Z. Overview of clinical occurrence of primary immunodeficiency disorders in 72 children. Chinese J Pract Pediatr 2007;22:612–5. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Zhao H, Chen T, Hao Y, et al. Overview of clinical occurrence of primary immunodeficiency disorders in children. Chinese J Pediat 2006;44:403–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Zhan YZ, Jiang LP, Zhou Y, et al. Clinical investigation of 135 primary immunodeficiency disorders in children. Chinese J Pract Pediatr 2009. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Wang L-L, Jin Y-Y, Hao Y-Q, et al. Distribution and clinical features of primary immunodeficiency diseases in Chinese children (2004–2009). J Clin Immunol 2011;31:297–308. 10.1007/s10875-010-9493-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Qin X, Jiang L-P, Tang X-M, et al. Clinical features and Mutation analysis of X-linked Agammaglobulinemia in 20 Chinese patients. World J Pediatr 2013;9:273–7. 10.1007/s12519-013-0400-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Chen X-F, Wang W-F, Zhang Y-D, et al. Clinical characteristics and genetic profiles of 174 patients with X-linked Agammaglobulinemia: report from Shanghai. Medicine 2016;95:e4544. 10.1097/MD.0000000000004544 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Tang W-J, An Y-F, Dai R-X, et al. Clinical, molecular, and T cell subset analyses in a small cohort of Chinese patients with hyper-Igm syndrome type 1. Hum Immunol 2014;75:633–40. 10.1016/j.humimm.2014.04.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Wang L-L, Zhou W, Zhao W, et al. Clinical features and genetic analysis of 20 Chinese patients with X-linked hyper-Igm syndrome. J Immunol Res 2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Xiang Q, Zhang L, Liu X, et al. Autosomal dominant hyper IGE syndrome from a single centre in Chongqing, China (2009‐2018). Scand J Immunol 2020;91:e12885. 10.1111/sji.12885 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Xu H, Tian W, Li S-J, et al. Clinical and molecular features of 38 children with chronic granulomatous disease in Mainland China. J Clin Immunol 2014;34:633–41. 10.1007/s10875-014-0061-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Wu J, Wang W-F, Zhang Y-D, et al. Clinical features and genetic analysis of 48 patients with chronic granulomatous disease in a single center study from Shanghai, China (2005–2015): new studies and a literature review. Journal of Immunology Research 2017;2017:1–17. 10.1155/2017/8745254 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Wang S, Wang T, Xiang Q, et al. Clinical and molecular features of chronic granulomatous disease in Mainland China and a XL-CGD female infant patient after Prenatal diagnosis. J Clin Immunol 2019;39:762–75. 10.1007/s10875-019-00680-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Liu D-W, Zhang Z-Y, Zhao Q, et al. Wiskott–Aldrich syndrome/X‐Linked thrombocytopenia in China: clinical characteristic and genotype–phenotype correlation. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2015;62:1601–8. 10.1002/pbc.25559 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Yao C-M, Han X-H, Zhang Y-D, et al. Clinical characteristics and genetic profiles of 44 patients with severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID): report from Shanghai. J Clin Immunol 2013;33:526–39. 10.1007/s10875-012-9854-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Zhang C, Zhang Z-Y, Wu J-F, et al. Clinical characteristics and Mutation analysis of X-linked severe combined immunodeficiency in China. World J Pediatr 2013;9:42–7. 10.1007/s12519-011-0330-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Yang L, Liu P, Du H, et al. Novel Cd81 mutations in a Chinese patient led to IgA nephropathy and impaired BCR signaling. J Clin Immunol 2022;42:1672–84. 10.1007/s10875-022-01333-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Wu J, Zhong W, Yin Y, et al. Primary immunodeficiency disease: a retrospective study of 112 Chinese children in a single tertiary care center. BMC Pediatr 2019;19:410. 10.1186/s12887-019-1729-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Luo M. Safety and efficacy of reduced toxicity regimen in patients with wiskott-aldrich syndrome undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Chongqing Medical University, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Wei A. Efficacy of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in 22 chinese children with chronic granulomatous disease. Chongqing Medical University, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Wang Z-Q, Meng Y, Dou Y, et al. Clinical effect of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in children with hyper-Igm syndrome. Chinese Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics 2022;24:635–42. 10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2112098 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Yang J, Zhu G-H, Wang B, et al. Haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for XIAP deficiency: a single-center report. J Clin Immunol 2020;40:893–900. 10.1007/s10875-020-00795-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Min J. "The first catalog of rare diseases" is officially released. China Medical News 2018;33:1. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.The first domestic "rare disease diagnosis and treatment guide (2019 edition)" is officially released. Medical Food Reference 2019;1. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Peng F, Zhong L, Zhang B, et al. Successful application of next-generation sequencing for pre-natal diagnosis in a pedigree with chronic granulomatosis disease. Exp Ther Med 2019;17:2931–6. 10.3892/etm.2019.7318 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Sun J, Wang Y, Liu D, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of X‐Linked chronic granulomatous disease by percutaneous umbilical blood sampling. Scand J Immunol 2012;76:512–8. 10.1111/j.1365-3083.2012.02772.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Liu N, Shi H, Kong X, et al. Mutation analysis of WASP gene and Prenatal diagnosis of Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome. Chinese J Pediat 2014;52:662–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Gao S, Hu S, Duan H, et al. Clinical characteristics and Prenatal diagnosis for 22 families in Henan province of China with X-linked Agammaglobulinemia (XLA) related to Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) gene mutations. BMC Med Genet 2020;21:131. 10.1186/s12881-020-01063-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Zhang J-Y, Chen S-C, Chen Y-Y, et al. Targeted sequencing identifies a novel Sh2D1A pathogenic variant in a Chinese family: carrier screening and Prenatal genetic testing. PLoS One 2017;12:e0172173. 10.1371/journal.pone.0172173 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Pai S-Y, Logan BR, Griffith LM, et al. Transplantation outcomes for severe combined immunodeficiency, 2000–2009. N Engl J Med 2014;371:434–46. 10.1056/NEJMoa1401177 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Modell V, Knaus M, Modell F. An analysis and decision tool to measure cost benefit of newborn screening for severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) and related T-cell Lymphopenia. Immunol Res 2014;60:145–52. 10.1007/s12026-014-8485-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Audrain MAP, Léger AJC, Hémont CAF, et al. Newborn screening for severe combined immunodeficiency: analytic and clinical performance of the T cell receptor Excision circle assay in France (DEPISTREC study). J Clin Immunol 2018;38:778–86. 10.1007/s10875-018-0550-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Thomas C, Durand-Zaleski I, Frenkiel J, et al. Clinical and economic aspects of newborn screening for severe combined immunodeficiency: DEPISTREC study results. Clin Immunol 2019;202:33–9. 10.1016/j.clim.2019.03.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Barbaro M, Ohlsson A, Borte S, et al. Newborn screening for severe primary immunodeficiency diseases in Sweden—a 2-year pilot TREC and KREC screening study. J Clin Immunol 2017;37:51–60. 10.1007/s10875-016-0347-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Van der Ploeg CPB, Blom M, Bredius RGM, et al. Cost-effectiveness of newborn screening for severe combined immunodeficiency. Eur J Pediatr 2019;178:721–9. 10.1007/s00431-019-03346-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Hao C, Guo R, Hu X, et al. Newborn screening with targeted sequencing: a multicenter investigation and a pilot clinical study in China. J Genet Genomics 2022;49:13–9. 10.1016/j.jgg.2021.08.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Bousfiha A, Moundir A, Tangye SG, et al. The 2022 update of IUIS Phenotypical classification for human inborn errors of immunity. J Clin Immunol 2022;42:1508–20. 10.1007/s10875-022-01352-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Mao HW, Zhao XD. Further strengthening immunoglobulin G replacement therapy for primary immunodeficiency diseases. Chinese J Pediat 2017;55:1–3. 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0578-1310.2017.01.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Sun J, Yang L, Lu Y, et al. Screening for primary immunodeficiency diseases by Next‐Generation sequencing in early life. Clin Transl Immunol 2020;9. 10.1002/cti2.1138 Available: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/20500068/9/5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Buckley RH, Schiff RI. The use of intravenous immune globulin in immunodeficiency diseases. N Engl J Med 1991;325:110–7. 10.1056/NEJM199107113250207 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Shi L, Zhang F, Sun Z, et al. Investigation on diagnosis, treatment and medical insurance of children with primary immunodeficiency diseases in China. China J Pharm Econ 2021;16:24–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 61.The Subspecialty Group of Immunology, the Society of Pediatrics, Chinese Medical Association; the Editorial Board, Chinese Journal of Pediatrics . Expert consensus on immunoglobulin G replacement therapy in primary immunodeficiency disease. Chinese J Pediat 2019;57:4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Hagan JB, Fasano MB, Spector S, et al. Efficacy and safety of a new 20% immunoglobulin preparation for subcutaneous administration, Igpro20, in patients with primary immunodeficiency. J Clin Immunol 2010;30:734–45. 10.1007/s10875-010-9423-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Jolles S, Bernatowska E, de Gracia J, et al. Efficacy and safety of Hizentra® in patients with primary immunodeficiency after a dose-equivalent switch from intravenous or subcutaneous replacement therapy. Clin Immunol 2011;141:90–102. 10.1016/j.clim.2011.06.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Zheng Y, An J, Lu D, et al. A case of allogeneic bone marrow transplantation for X-linked Agammaglobulinemia. Chinese J Pediatr 1991;29:324–6. [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Liu S, Huo F, Dai G, et al. Case report: immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for severe combined immunodeficiency. Front Immunol 2022;13:13. 10.3389/fimmu.2022.960749 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Booth C, Romano R, Roncarolo MG, et al. Gene therapy for primary immunodeficiency. Hum Mol Genet 2019;28:R15–23. 10.1093/hmg/ddz170 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Reviewer comments
Author's manuscript

Articles from BMJ Paediatrics Open are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES