Skip to main content
Science Progress logoLink to Science Progress
. 2022 Apr 19;105(2):00368504221094161. doi: 10.1177/00368504221094161

Elevated PaCO2 levels increase pulmonary artery pressure

Apostolos Triantaris 1, Isaak Aidonidis 2, Apostolia Hatziefthimiou 2,✉, Konstantinos Gourgoulianis 3, Georgios Zakynthinos 1, Demosthenes Makris 1
PMCID: PMC10358613  PMID: 35440248

Abstract

Permissive hypercapnia is commonly used in mechanically ventilated patients to avoid lung injury but its effect on pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) is still unclear, particularly in combination with tidal volume (Vt). Therefore, an in vivo study was performed on adult rabbits ventilated with low (9 ml/Kg, LVt group) or high (15 ml/Kg, HVt group) tidal volume (Vt) and alterations in PAP were estimated. Both groups of animals initially were ventilated with FiO2 0.3 (Normocapnia-1) followed by inhalation of enriched CO2 gas mixture (FiCO2 0.10) to develop hypercapnia (Hypercapnia-1). After 30 min of hypercapnia, animals were re-ventilated with FiO2 0.3 to develop normocapnia (Normocapnia-2) again and then with FiCO2 0.10 to develop hypercapnia (Hypercapnia-2). Systolic, diastolic and mean PAP were assessed with a catheter in the pulmonary artery. In HP-1 and HP-2, PaCO2 increased (p < 0.0001) in both LVt and HVt animals compared to baseline values. pH decreased to ≈7.2 in HP-1 and ≈7.1 in HP −2. In normocapnia, the rise in Vt from 9 to 15 ml/Kg induced an increase in static compliance (Cstat), plateau airway pressure (Pplat) and PAP. Hypercapnia increased PAP in either LVt or HVt animals without significant effect on Cstat or Pplat. A two-way ANOVA revealed that there was not a statistically significant interaction between the effects of hypercapnia and tidal volume on mPAP (p = 0.76). In conclusion, increased Vt per se induced an increase in Cstat, Pplat and PAP in normocapnia. Hypercapnia increased PAP in rabbits ventilated with low or high Vt but this effect was not long-lasting.

Keywords: pulmonary artery pressure, mechanical ventilation, hypercapnia, tidal volume, permissive hypercapnia

Introduction

The application of lung-protective mechanical ventilation with low tidal volumes (Vts) is a common clinical strategy applied to patients with respiratory diseases, like acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), 1 exacerbation of asthma 2 or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). 3 The practice of low tidal volumes aims to reduce stretch and shear forces to the alveolar wall and to protect lungs from trauma, but this ventilator strategy may result in hypercapnia (permissive hypercapnia).

Although protective lung ventilation with low Vts, leads to an improvement in patient outcomes,4,5 often causes hypercapnia with various physiologic effects, 6 beneficial or deleterious.1,7 Studies in animal models revealed that alterations in Vt seem to affect the release of pulmonary pro-inflammatory cytokines 8 and low Vt affects pulmonary vasomotor tone via inhibition of the expression of endothelin-1, endothelial nitric oxide synthase and tumor necrosis factor-alpha. 9 On the other hand, the consequence of hypercapnia on pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) is controversial and seems to depend on the tone of the vessels as well as on the species. Indicatively, in isolated rat pulmonary artery rings, hypercapnia was vasoconstrictor, by reducing nitric oxide production from the endothelium, 10 caused strong vasoconstriction in isolated cat lung preparations 11 and increased mean PAP and pulmonary vascular resistance in humans. 12 On the contrary, hypercapnia reduced hypoxia-induced pulmonary vascular resistance in juvenile rats 13 or rabbits. 14 Even more, until now is questionable if the effect of CO2 on pulmonary vessels is direct or is mediated via pH alterations, as pH per se may affect vascular tone. 15

As the effect of hypercapnia on pulmonary vessels remains still unclear, specifically in conditions of mechanical ventilation, in the present study we investigated the effect of hypercapnia combination with the use of low or high Vt on the PAP. For this purpose, an in vivo study was performed on anesthetized healthy rabbits, mechanically ventilated with low (9 ml/Kg) or high (15 ml/Kg) Vt under normocapnic and hypercapnic conditions. Although lower tidal volume ventilation has a beneficial effect and improves survival in mechanically ventilated patients, hypercapnia and acidosis might be associated with adverse clinical outcomes and requires optimum management.16,17 In an attempt to mimic clinical practice, in the present study we investigated the effect of preconditioning (an initial episode of hypercapnia, combined with Vt) on PAP in following hypercapnic episodes after the mediation of normopoxia lasting 30 min.

Materials and methods

Overall, twenty-eight adult male New Zealand white rabbits, with mean weight (SD) 3.00 (0.54) Kg, were used in the experiments; two of them died during procedures; deaths were attributed to anesthesia induction or to pneumoperitoneum in one case and occurred early during experiments before the application of any experimental condition. Animals received human care and experiments were performed in accordance with the European Community and NIH guidelines for using experimental animals. All procedures were approved by our institution's Animal Studies Committee [EL 42 BIO 04]. The rabbits were housed in individual cages at a constant ambient temperature with a 12-h light and dark cycle.

Animals were anesthetized with the administration of 100 mg ketamine intramuscularly and of midazolam intravenously at a rate of 0.1–0.2 mg/kg/h. Once the anesthesia took effect, a peripheral vein cannula was inserted and administration of 0.9% Normal Saline, 15 ml/h, was commenced. Tracheostomy was performed based on previous reports 18 and the animals were subsequently endotracheally intubated and subjected to neuromuscular blockade with 1 mg cis-atracurium intravenously and thereafter anesthesia and muscle relaxation were maintained with periodic intravenous infusions of midazolam and cis-atracurium to ensure sedation and muscle relaxation and to prevent spontaneous efforts. Spontaneous efforts were detected using the flow pressure curves on the ventilator screen. Animals were mechanically ventilated with a ventilator (Evita 2 dura, Dräger Medical GmbH, Germany) until stable respiratory conditions with a volume-controlled mode: ventilated with a fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) 0.3, frequency 35–45 cycles/min, Vt 9 ml/Kg and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) 2 cmH2O.

Subsequently, the femoral artery was exposed and cannulated and the right jugular vein was prepared; the pulmonary artery was cannulated based on previously described techniques.19–21 Briefly, an angled polypropylene introducer made from standard tubing 15 cm long, external diameter 3 mm and lumen diameter 2 mm was used. The distal 1.5 cm was heat angled at 90 degrees to the shaft and a marker was made to indicate the direction of the angle. The introducer was filled with heparinized saline and a No. 4.5 French gauge right side coronary angiography catheter - which has its tip angled - was inserted so that the tip lay just inside the distal end of the introducer. The catheter was then filled with heparinized saline and was connected to a pressure transducer. Following the exposure of the right jugular vein, the introducer-catheter assembly was inserted and passed into the right ventricle through the superior vena cava and the right atrium using the pressure signals for guidance. Correct placement in the right ventricle was confirmed by the pressure signal and then the angled tip was rotated to point anteriorly and slightly to the left and was withdrawn until the angle impinged on the tricuspid valve. One ml of cold saline was flushed through the catheter and the catheter was advanced to pass directly into the pulmonary artery. Correct placement was confirmed by the change in the pressure signal. 22

Samples of arterial blood were obtained from the femoral artery (0.5 ml of arterial blood was discarded and 0.3 ml was sampled) for blood pH and gas measurements (RAPIDlab 1265, Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Inc., USA). End-expiratory carbon dioxide was continuously monitored using a capnograph (CO2SMO MONITOR, Respironics, USA) adapted to the endotracheal tube. The animals were ventilated with the aforementioned baseline settings to obtain stable physiological conditions (end-tidal CO2 ranged between 33–43 mmHg) and then were randomly assigned into two groups based on ventilation settings and inhaled gas mixtures. One animal group was ventilated with 9 ml/Kg (low Vt - LVt) and the other with 15 ml/Kg (high Vt-HVt). The choice of Vt was based on previous in vivo studies in rabbit 23 reporting similar tidal volumes as moderate and large respectively. Respiratory frequencies were titrated accordingly in order to obtain the normocapnic baseline conditions. A respiratory frequency of 35 was set in the HVt group or 45 in the LVt respectively, titrated in each case according to end-tidal CO2/CO2 levels. For both groups, FiO2 was 0.3 (Normocapnic Phase-1, NP-1, Figure 1). To develop hypercapnia, animals of each Vt group inhaled an enriched in CO2 gas mixture via connection to the respirator of a gas cylinder prefilled CO2 gas mixture (FiO2 0.3, FiCO2 0.10). The partial pressure of CO2 of arterial blood (PaCO2) was targeted between 70–90 mmHg (Hypercapnic Phase-1, HP-1, Figure 1). The animals then were re-ventilated with FiO2 0.3, FiCO2 (Normocapnic Phase-2, NP-2, Figure 1) and were re-exposed to enriched in CO2 gas mixture (FiO2 0.3, FiCO2 0.10) to assess the impact of hypercapnic preconditioning in pulmonary pressure (Hypercapnic Phase-2, HP-2, Figure 1). All animals were exposed to each setting for 30 min to obtain a stable condition before measurements and between different conditions were ventilated with the baseline settings for 30 min. minimum time necessary to obtain stable conditions based on preliminary experiments. At the end of the experiments, animals were sacrificed by IV administering of potassium chloride 5% while they were still under anesthesia.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Flowchart of the study.

Systolic (sPAP), diastolic (dPAP) and mean (mPAP) pulmonary artery pressure were recorded at expiration and were measured with piezo pressure transducers integrated in a polygraph system (RM6000; Nihon Kohden, Tokyo, Japan). The pressure transducer was calibrated immediately before, after, and when necessary, during each procedure. Airway pressures were assessed from the curves obtained on the ventilator screen. To assess plateau airway pressure (Pplat) we used the inspiratory hold button of the ventilator for a 4 s period; PEEP levels were assessed by using the expiratory hold button of the ventilator to perform end-expiratory airway occlusion. To evaluate whether the mechanical properties of the lung remained intact, we measured respiratory system and lung compliance. To calculate the static compliance of the respiratory system (Cstat), end-inspiratory occlusion was repeated three times. Each occlusion was held for 4 s Cstat was calculated as:

Cstat = Vt/(Pplat –PEEP)

Where, Vt = Tidal Volume, Pplat = Plateau pressure, PEEP = Positive End Expiratory Pressure

In three animals, the heart and the lungs were exposed for assessment of the mechanical properties of the exposed lungs and for macroscopic inspection of the placement of the catheter. Mechanical properties of the exposed lungs were calculated in different volumes beginning at a low volume (10 ml) and reaching volumes close to total lung capacity (80 ml) (Figure S1).

The effect of hypercapnia or Vt on pulmonary artery pressures (systolic, diastolic and mean) was the primary outcome of this investigation.

Statistics

All data are expressed as means ± standard deviation (SD) and n refers to the number of animals. The data were analyzed for normality with the Shapiro-Wilk test and the effect of Vt, Hypercapnia and their interaction on mPAP was assessed by two-way ANOVA. A comparison is considered significant when p < 0.05. The statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Image v5 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA).

Results

Effect of hypercapnia on PaO2, PaCO2, pH, heart rate, plateau airway pressure and static compliance

As expected, during hypercapnia −1 and −2, partial pressure of CO2 of arterial blood (PaCO2) increased significantly (p < 0.0001) in both LVt and HVt groups compared to baseline values but did not differ significantly between the two groups (Table 1). On the other hand, partial pressure of O2 of arterial blood (PaO2) did not alter significantly in all experimental settings. pH values decreased during hypercapnia, in both setting hypercapnia −1 and −2 in either LVt and HVt groups, although these changes are not statistically significant compared to baseline values (Table 1).

Table 1.

Pao2, PaCO2, pH and heart rate values during different settings in animals ventilated with low, 9 ml/Kg (LVt, n = 13) or high, 15 ml/Kg (HVt, n = 12) tidal volume.

PaO2
(mmHg)
PaCO2
(mmHg)
pH Heart Rate
(pulses/min)
LVt HVt LVt HVt LVt HVt LVt HVt
Baseline 238
(38)
235
(25)
44
(6)
46
(6)
7.39
(0.2)
7.39
(0.5)
270
(12)
270
(12)
Normocapnia-1 212
(35)
222
(30)
43
(6)
41
(6)
7.38
(0.2)
7.36
(0.5)
274
(11)
275
(11)
Hypercapnia-1 220
(30)
215
(35)
81****
(8)
82****
(7)
7.22
(0.4)
7.2
(0.6)
280
(12)
278
(12)
Normocapnia-2 229
(35)
224
(32)
43.5
(5)
43
(5)
7.31
(0.5)
7.29
(0.6)
272
(11)
270
(11)
Hypercapnia-2 240
(35)
238
(38)
88****
(8)
84****
(9)
7.12
(0.9)
7.08
(0.7)
282
(12)
278
(12)

Values are presented as mean (SD). ****p < 0.0001 compared to the corresponding values at baseline.

In normocapnia, the static compliance (Cstat) was 3.22 ± 0.43 and 3.68 ± 0.31 ml/cm H2O in LVt and HVt groups respectively with no significant differences between the groups (Figure 2(a)). On the other hand, plateau airway pressure (Pplat) was increased significantly (p = 0.002) in HVt animals compared to LVt (Figure 2(b)). Pplat values were 10.23 ± 1.79 ml/cm H2O in LVt and 11.82 ± 1.19 ml/cm H2O in HVt animals. Both Cstat and Pplat did not alter significantly during the experimental procedure (data not shown).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Tidal volume effect on (a) static compliance (cstat) and (b) plateau airway pressure (pplat) under normocapnia conditions in animals ventilated with 9 ml/Kg (LVt) or 15 ml/Kg (HVt) tidal volume.

Tidal compliance of exposed lungs was calculated in three rabbits and was 4.3 to 6.0 ml/cm H2O.

Effect of hypercapnia on pulmonary artery pressures in LVt and HVt animals

In either LVt or HVt animals, hypercapnia increased significantly (p < 0.05) pulmonary artery pressure (sPAP, dPAP and mPAP) compared to normocapnic conditions (Figure 3, Table 2). Interestingly, the use of higher tidal volumes (15 ml/Kg) in normocapnic conditions resulted in a significant increase in all PAP compared to animals ventilated with 9 ml/Kg Vt (Table 2). These significant differences in all PAP observed in normocapnia remained and in hypercapnic conditions (Table 2) as animals ventilated with 15 ml/Kg (HVt) presented significantly higher sPAP, dPAP and mPAP compared to animals ventilated with 9 ml/Kg (LVt). Two-way ANOVA showed a significant effect of hypercapnia or Vt on mPAP (p = 0.0005 and p = 0.0008 respectively) but no significant hypercapnia-Vt interaction (p = 0.75)

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Compared to normocapnia (NP-1), hypercapnia (HP-1) increased systolic pulmonary artery pressure (sPAP) in animals ventilated with 9 ml/Kg (a) or 15 ml/Kg (b) tidal volume, diastolic pulmonary artery pressure (dPAP) in animals ventilated with 9 ml/Kg (c) or 15 ml/Kg (d) tidal volume and mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) in animals ventilated with 9 ml/Kg (e) or 15 ml/Kg tidal volume (f).

Table 2.

Systolic (sPAP), diastolic (dPAP) and mean (mPAP), values during different settings in animals ventilated with low, 9 ml/Kg (LVt, n = 8) or high, 15 ml/Kg (HVt, n = 8) tidal volume.

sPAP (mmHg) dPAP (mmHg) mPAP (mmHg)
LVt HVt p LVt HVt p LVt HVt p
NP-1 16.13
(4.16)
26.63
(4.84)
0.004 7.38
(3.02)
17.63
(4.75)
0.0009 10.58
(3.07)
20.63
(4.65)
0.001
HP-1 23.25*
(7.50)
34.63*
(4.92)
0.003 13.00*
(6.61)
23.38*
(2.83)
0.0008 16.54*
(6.44)
27.25*
(3.59)
0.0008

Values are presented as mean (SD), p for comparisons between LVt and HVt groups. *p < 0.05 for comparison between normocapnia-1(NP-1) and hypercapnia-1(HP-1) in the same animal group.

Effect of preconditioning on pulmonary artery pressures

After the first episode of hypercapnia (Hypercapnia −1, HP-1) both LVt and HVt animals were ventilated with FiO2 0.3 for 30 min (Normocania-2, NP-2) and then were exposed to FiO2 0.3/FiCO2 0.10 to assess a second episode of hypercapnia (Hypercapnia-2, HP-2). No statistically significant differences in pulmonary artery pressures (sPAP, dPAP or mPAP) were observed between values obtained under NP-1 and NP-2 conditions or during HP-2 compared to HP-1 (Table 3).

Table 3.

Systolic (sPAP), diastolic (dPAP) and mean (mPAP), values during different settings in animals ventilated with low, 9 ml/Kg (n = 8) or high, 15 ml/Kg (n = 8) tidal volume.

Normocapnia 1 Hypercapnia 1 Normocapnia 2 Hypercapnia 2
Animals ventilated with low tidal volume (9 ml/Kg)
sPAP (mmHg) 16.13 (4.16) 23.25 (7.50) 18.57 (10.15) 26.63 (9.21)
dPAP (mmHg) 7.38 (3.02) 13.00 (6.61) 12.79 (5.73) 16.88 (5.62)
mPAP (mmHg) 10.58 (3.07) 16.54 (6.44) 14.71 (5.83) 20.13 (6.54)
Animals ventilated with high tidal volume (15 ml/Kg)
sPAP (mmHg) 26.63 (4.84)* 34.63 (4.92)** 26.00 (4.38) 39.40 (8.36)**
dPAP (mmHg) 17.63 (4.75)*** 23.38 (2.83)*** 18.63 (5.73) 22.00 (2.12)
mPAP (mmHg) 20.63 (4.65)*** 27.25 (3.59)*** 19.96 (3.96) 27.80 (3.81)*

Values are presented as mean (SD), *p < 0.05, **p < 0.001 and ***p < 0.001 for comparison between animal groups.

Discussion

The main finding of this in vivo study was that the increase in tidal volume, hypercapnia or the combination of the two resulted in a significant increase in systolic, diastolic and mean pulmonary artery pressure. Previous animal exposure to hypercapnic conditions (preconditioning) did not protect the animal from the development of high pulmonary artery pressure when re-exposed to hypercapnia. Both animal groups (LVt and HVt) developed acidosis during the first episode of hypercapnia (HP-1, pH ≈7.2) and pH reduction was more prominent at the second hypercapnic episode (HP-2, pH ≈7.1). Therefore, the rise in PaCO2 and/or acidosis may be implicated in the increase of PAP observed in hypercapnia.

At baseline, pulmonary artery pressure (sPAP, dPAP and mPAP) was at levels similar to those reported in other studies in rabbits.24,25 In this study, we assessed PAP at two different Vt (9 and 15 ml/Kg) aiming to simulate the clinical scenario in humans where low or high Vt may produce different levels of stress in the pulmonary vasculature.26,27 In normocapic conditions, the increase of Vt from 9 to 15 ml/Kg affected plateau airway (Figure 2(b)) and pulmonary (Table 2) pressure with no statistically significant effect on static compliance (Figure 2(a)). Our results suggest that in mechanical ventilation, Vt alone may be a significant parameter affecting PAP. Similar results were obtained from ex-vivo studies on isolated-perfused rabbit lung model showed that ventilation with high pressure increased mean PAP. 28 Although it is well known that high Vt may cause lung injury, 29 little is known about the mechanisms involved in the immediate effect of Vt on PAP. Studies on rat isolated pulmonary artery showed that high Vt may induce endothelium dysfunction. 30 The hemodynamic effects of Vt are attributed to changes in pleural and transpulmonary pressure which among others may increase PAP. 31 On the other hand, the relationship between PaCO2 alone or in combination with Vt and PAP is not clear, particularly in mechanical ventilation. In our study, hypercapnia (PaCO2 = 81.3 ± 8.2 mmHg vs PaCO2 = 37.7 ± 5.0 mmHg) induced an increase in PAP (Figure 3) without significant effect on arterial pressure and heart rate. Even more, hypercapnia-induced increase in PAP was more noticeable in HVt animals (Table 2). As animals exhibited acidosis during hypercapnia (Table 1) both the rise in PaCO2 or/and the decrease in pH may be responsible for the rise in PAP. Studies on isolated ventilated-perfused rabbit lung, hypercapnia affected pulmonary vascular tone only in hypoxic conditions, as no alteration in pulmonary vascular tone was noted during normoxic hypercapnia with or without acidosis compared with normoxic normocapnia. 32

An increase in PAP could be due to the rise of pulmonary vascular resistance, lung volume or cardiac output. Studies on isolated hearts clearly showed a direct depressive effect of high CO2 on cardiac function, however, in vivo studies suggest that hypercapnia may cause transient or minimal effects on cardiac output.12,33 Acute hypercapnia or/and respiratory acidosis may affect myocardial contractility via adrenal release of catecholamines. 34 According to our results (Table 1), systemic blood pressure and heart rate did not significantly alter during hypercapnia. Although we did not evaluate the cardiac output directly, the above indirect evidence suggests that the effect of hypercapnia and/or acidosis on PAP might not be due to an increase in cardiac output. Regardless of cardiac output, change in lung volume associated with ventilation can alter PAP as it affects pulmonary vascular resistance and elastance. 35 In consistent with our findings, in normocapnic conditions, in HVt rabbits, PAP increased compared to LVt animals (Table 2). However, we found no statistically significant difference in the static compliance of the respiratory system between hypercapnic and normocapnic conditions and CRSstat values were similar to previous observations in rabbits. 23 Though we did not investigate the mechanism(s) involved in the hypercapnia-evoked increase of PAP, we assume that most possibly hypercapnia affected pulmonary vascular resistance. Data from several animal studies on isolated pulmonary artery8,36 or lung preparations11,37,38 revealed that elevated CO2 alone or/and acidosis induced vasoconstriction. Interestingly, data available from animal studies suggest that hypercapnia may produce pulmonary vasodilatation when the vascular tone is increased due to hypoxia or vasoconstrictive agents.39,40

Finally, we investigated if hypercapnic preconditioning has an impact on PAP. In our experimental procedure (Figure 1), after the first exposure to hypercapnia (HP-1), animals were re-ventilated with increased FiCO2 0.3 and after 30 min a new hypercapic episode occurred (HP-2). We found no statistically significant differences in mPAP between HP-1 and HP-2. These results suggest that the effect of hypercapnia does not cause long-term changes in PAP.

In conclusion, the present in vivo study suggests that hypercapnia increased pulmonary artery pressures in rabbits ventilated with low or high Vt. Increased Vt per se induced increased pulmonary pressure but in combination with hypercapnia this increase is more noticeable. Although we must extrapolate with caution our findings to clinical practice, the common practice to use low Vt in mechanical ventilation is protective and could prevent pulmonary hypertension.

Supplemental Material

sj-pptx-1-sci-10.1177_00368504221094161 - Supplemental material for Elevated PaCO2 levels increase pulmonary artery pressure

Supplemental material, sj-pptx-1-sci-10.1177_00368504221094161 for Elevated PaCO2 levels increase pulmonary artery pressure by Apostolos Triantaris, Isaak Aidonidis, Apostolia Hatziefthimiou, Konstantinos Gourgoulianis, Georgios Zakynthinos and Demosthenes Makris in Science Progress

Abbreviations

PAP

pulmonary artery pressure

sPAP

Systolic pulmonary artery pressure

dPAP

diastolic pulmonary artery pressure

mPAP

mean pulmonary artery pressure

Pplat

plateau airway pressure

Cstat

static compliance of the respiratory system

PEEP

positive end-expiratory pressure

Vt

tidal volume

Footnotes

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Funding: The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Author contributions: D. Makris, conception and design of research

A. Triantaris, I. Aidonidis and D. Makris performed experiments

A. Triantaris, A. Hatziefthimiou and D. Makris analyzed data, interpreted results of experiments, prepared figures and drafted manuscript

A. Triantaris, A. Hatziefthimiou, D. Makris, I. Aidonidis, K. Gourgoulianis and G. Zakynthinos edited manuscript

All the authors approved the final version of manuscript

ORCID iD: Apostolia Hatziefthimiou https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3128-8695

Supplemental material: Supplemental material for this article is available online.

References

  • 1.Morales-Quinteros L, Camprubí-Rimblas M, Bringué Jet al. et al. The role of hypercapnia in acute respiratory failure. Intensive Care Med Exp 2019; 7: 39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Laher AE, Buchanan SK. Mechanically ventilating the severe asthmatic. J Intensive Care Med 2018; 33: 491–501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.MacIntyre N, Huang YC. Acute exacerbations and respiratory failure in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Proc Am Thorac Soc 2008; 5: 530–535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network, Brower RG, Matthay MA, Morris Aet al. et al. Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2000; 342: 1301–1308.. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hickling KG, Walsh J, Henderson Set al. et al. Low mortality rate in adult respiratory distress syndrome using low-volume, pressure-limited ventilation with permissive hypercapnia: a prospective study. Crit Care Med 1994; 22: 1568–1578. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Curley G, Laffey JG, Kavanagh BP. Bench-to-bedside review: carbon dioxide. Crit Care 2010; 14: 20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Barnes T, Zochios V, Parhar K. Re-examining permissive hypercapnia in ARDS: a narrative review. Chest 2018; 154: 185–195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Zhang Y, Gao J, Wang CJet al. et al. Low tidal volume ventilation preconditioning ameliorates lipopolysaccharide-induced acute lung injury in rats. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2016; 60: 780–789. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Pan C, Wang J, Liu Wet al. et al. Low tidal volume protects pulmonary vasomotor function from “second-hit” injury in acute lung injury rats. Respir Res 2012; 13: 77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lynch F, Sweeney M, O’Regan RGet al. et al. Hypercapnia-induced contraction in isolated pulmonary arteries is endothelium-dependent. Respir Physiol 2000; 121: 65–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Barer GR, Shaw JW. Pulmonary vasodilator and vasoconstrictor actions of carbon dioxide. J Physiol 1971; 213: 633–645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kiely DG, Cargill RI, Lipworth BJ. Effects of hypercapnia on hemodynamic, inotropic, lusitropic, and electrophysiologic indices in humans. Chest 1996; 109: 1215–1221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Peng G, Ivanovska J, Kantores Cet al. Sustained therapeutic hypercapnia attenuates pulmonary arterial rho-kinase activity and ameliorates chronic hypoxic pulmonary hypertension in juvenile rats. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2012; 302: H2599–H2611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ketabchi F, Ghofrani HA, Schermuly RTet al. Effects of hypercapnia and NO synthase inhibition in sustained hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction. Respir Res 2012; 13: 7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Aalkjaer C, Poston L. Effects of pH on vascular tension: which are the important mechanisms? J Vasc Res 1996; 33: 347–359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Tiruvoipati R, Gupta S, Pilcher Det al. et al. Management of hypercapnia in critically ill mechanically ventilated patients-A narrative review of literature. J Intensive Care Soc 2020; 21: 327–333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Nassar B. Should we be permissive with hypercapnia? Ann Am Thorac Soc 2022; 19: 165–166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Rotta AT, Gunnarsson B, Fuhrman BPet al. et al. Comparison of lung protective ventilation strategies in a rabbit model of acute lung injury. Crit Care Med 2001; 29: 2176–2184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Vejlstrup NG, Dorrington KL. Intense slow hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction in gas-filled and liquid-filled lungs: an in vivo study in the rabbit. Acta Physiol Scand 1993; 148: 305–313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Forrest JB, Todd MH, Cragg DJ. A simple method of percutaneous cannulation of the pulmonary artery in small mammals. Can Anaesth Soc J 1979; 26: 58–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Owen-Thomas JB, Reeves JT. Hypoxia and pulmonary arterial pressure in the rabbit. J Physiol 1969; 201: 665–672. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ellertson DG, McGough EC, Rasmussen Bet al. et al. Pulmonary artery monitoring in critically ill surgical patients. Am J Surg 1974; 128: 791–796. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Svantesson C, John J, Taskar Vet al. et al. Respiratory mechanics in rabbits ventilated with different tidal volumes. Respir Physiol 1996; 106: 307–316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Wang W, Liu R, Cao Get al. et al. A reliable rabbit model for hyperkinetic pulmonary hypertension. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010; 140: 395–399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Liu C, Yan Z, Fang Cet al. et al. Establishment and comparison of two reliable hyperkinetic pulmonary hypertension models in rabbits. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014; 148: 2353–2359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Whittenberger JL, McGregor M, Berglund Eet al. et al. Influence of state of inflation of the lung on pulmonary vascular resistance. J Appl Physiol 1960; 15: 878–882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Chiumello D, Carlesso E, Cadringher Pet al. Lung stress and strain during mechanical ventilation for acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2008; 178: 346–355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kapetanakis T, Siempos II, Metaxas EIet al. Metabolic acidosis may be as protective as hypercapnic acidosis in an ex-vivo model of severe ventilator-induced lung injury: a pilot study. BMC Anesthesiol 2011; 11: 18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Katira BH. Ventilator-induced lung injury: classic and novel concepts. Respir Care 2019; 64: 629–637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Menendez C, Martinez-Caro L, Moreno Let al. Pulmonary vascular dysfunction induced by high tidal volume mechanical ventilation. Crit Care Med 2013; 41: e149–e155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Vieillard-Baron A, Matthay M, Teboul JLet al. et al. Experts’ opinion on management of hemodynamics in ARDS patients: focus on the effects of mechanical ventilation. Intensive Care Med 2016; 42: 739–749. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Ketabchi F, Egemnazarov B, Schermuly RTet al. Effects of hypercapnia with and without acidosis on hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2009; 297: L977–L983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Crystal GJ. Carbon dioxide and the heart: physiology and clinical implications. Anesth Analg 2015; 121: 610–623. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Lee JC, Downing SE. Effects of hypercapnia on myocardial contractility in piglets. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 1983; 174: 401–406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Mahmood SS, Pinsky MR.Heart-lung interactions during mechanical ventilation: the basics. Ann Transl Med 2018; 6: 49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Xu Y, Lin L, Tang Let al. et al. Notoginsenoside R1 attenuates hypoxia and hypercapnia-induced vasoconstriction in isolated rat pulmonary arterial rings by reducing the expression of ERK. Am J Chin Med 2014; 42: 799–816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Baudouin SV, Evans TW. Action of carbon dioxide on hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction in the rat lung: evidence against specific endothelium-derived relaxing factor-mediated vasodilation. Crit Care Med 1993; 21: 740–746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Gao Y, Tassiopoulos AK, McGraw DJet al. et al. Segmental pulmonary vascular responses to changes in pH in rat lungs: role of nitric oxide. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1999; 43: 64–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Chuang IC, Dong HP, Yang RCet al. et al. Effect of carbon dioxide on pulmonary vascular tone at various pulmonary arterial pressure levels induced by endothelin-1. Lung 2010; 188: 199–207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Chuang IC, Yang RC, Chou SHet al. et al. Effect of carbon dioxide inhalation on pulmonary hypertension induced by increased blood flow and hypoxia. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 2011; 27: 336–343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

sj-pptx-1-sci-10.1177_00368504221094161 - Supplemental material for Elevated PaCO2 levels increase pulmonary artery pressure

Supplemental material, sj-pptx-1-sci-10.1177_00368504221094161 for Elevated PaCO2 levels increase pulmonary artery pressure by Apostolos Triantaris, Isaak Aidonidis, Apostolia Hatziefthimiou, Konstantinos Gourgoulianis, Georgios Zakynthinos and Demosthenes Makris in Science Progress


Articles from Science Progress are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications

RESOURCES