Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Plant Biotechnology Journal logoLink to Plant Biotechnology Journal
. 2023 Apr 14;21(8):1542–1559. doi: 10.1111/pbi.14056

The miR156b–GmSPL2b module mediates male fertility regulation of cytoplasmic male sterility‐based restorer line under high‐temperature stress in soybean

Xianlong Ding 1, Jinfeng Guo 1, Menglin Lv 1, Hongjie Wang 1, Ying Sheng 1, Ying Liu 1, Junyi Gai 1, Shouping Yang 1,✉
PMCID: PMC10363761  PMID: 37057908

Summary

High‐temperature (HT) stress at flowering stage causes significant damage to soybean, including pollen abortion and fertilization failure, but few genes involved in male fertility regulation under HT stress in soybean have been characterized. Here, we demonstrated that miR156b–GmSPL2b module involved in male fertility regulation of soybean cytoplasmic male sterility (CMS)‐based restorer line under HT stress. Overexpression of miR156b decreased male fertility in soybean CMS‐based restorer line and its hybrid F1 with CMS line under HT stress. RNA‐seq analysis found that miR156b mediated male fertility regulation in soybean under HT stress by regulating the expression of pollen development and HT response related genes. Metabolomic analysis of miR156bOE revealed reduction in flavonoid content under HT stress. Integrated transcriptomic and metabolomic analysis showed that the overexpression of miR156b caused flavonoid metabolism disorder in soybean flower bud under HT stress. Knockout of GmSPL2b also decreased the thermotolerance of soybean CMS‐based restorer line during flowering. Moreover, GmSPL2b turned out to be directly bounded to the promoter of GmHSFA6b. Further verification indicated that GmHSFA6b overexpression enhanced HT tolerance in Arabidopsis during flowering. Substance content and gene expression analysis revealed that miR156b–GmSPL2b may mediate reactive oxygen species clearance by regulating flavonoid metabolism, thus participating in the regulation of male fertility in soybean under HT stress. This study not only provided important progress for understanding the molecular mechanism of miR156b–GmSPL2b regulating the male fertility of soybean CMS‐based restorer line under HT stress, but also provided genetic resources and theoretical basis for creating HT‐tolerant strong restorer lines.

Keywords: soybean (Glycine max), miR156b, GmSPL2b, GmHSFA6b, high‐temperature stress, male fertility

Introduction

Soybean is an important protein and oil crop, and the utilization of heterosis is an important way to achieve crop yield breakthrough. The ‘cytoplasmic male sterility (CMS)‐based’ breeding system is one of the most widely used systems of crop hybrid breeding, which has achieved great success in rice, corn, rape and other crops (Chen and Liu, 2014). Utilization of soybean heterosis has gradually become one of the important ways to achieve a breakthrough in soybean yield (Sun et al., 2021a). Soybean heterosis utilization research and application has made great progress, according to statistics, by 2021, Chinese soybean researchers have cultivated 39 new hybrid soybean varieties using ‘CMS‐based’ hybrid production system, with an average increase of more than 13% over the control, and have been popularized and applied in production (Sun et al., 2021a). However, male fertility of some soybean CMS‐based F1 combinations was susceptible to the environmental interference, resulting in a significant decrease in pollen fertility rate (Ding et al., 2020a; Xie, 2008), which became a huge potential hazard for the promotion and application of soybean CMS‐based hybrid. Previous studies have found that high temperature (HT) is one of the main factors affecting the difference of male fertility restoration of CMS‐based F1 in rice, soybean and cotton (Ding et al., 2020a; Wang, 2019; Zhao et al., 2009). The main reason for this phenomenon is that the male fertility restorability of some CMS‐based restorer lines is not enough, but the negative effect of sterile cytoplasm on hybrid can be effectively inhibited by introducing strong restorer‐of‐fertility gene(s) or fertility enhancer gene(s) (Sun et al., 2021a; Wang, 2019). Wang and Li (2002) found that the introduction and overexpression of Glutathione S‐transferase (GST), a fertility enhancer gene, in cotton CMS‐based restorer line could improve the GST enzyme activity of cotton CMS‐based F1 anther to promote reactive oxygen species (ROS) clearance. Thus, the pollen fertility of cotton CMS‐based F1 could be effectively protected under HT stress. However, the effects of HT on male fertility of soybean CMS‐based F1 have not been systematically and deeply studied compared to cotton CMS‐based F1, etc.

MIR156 is one of the highly conserved miRNA families in plants, and its target genes are a family of plant‐specific squamosa promoter‐binding protein‐like (SPL) transcription factors (Lei and Liu, 2016). miR156 can recognize the miR156‐binding site in its target gene SPL, and the SBP conserved domain of SPL protein can bind to the GTAC cis‐acting element of downstream regulatory gene promoter region to regulate its expression, so as to realize the regulation of plant growth and development (Cui et al., 2020; Dai et al., 2018; Lei and Liu, 2016; Ma et al., 2021; Yun et al., 2022). The miR156–SPL module modulates inflorescence morphogenesis, plant pollen number, plant architecture, salt stress and nodulation by regulating the expression of SINGLE FLOWER TRUSS, ASYMMETRIC LEAVES 2, GH3, WRKY100 and Nodule Inception a, respectively (Cui et al., 2020; Dai et al., 2018; Ma et al., 2021; Wang et al., 2016; Yun et al., 2022). Furthermore, many reports have also found that miR156–SPL module was involved in response to HT stress during seedling and flowering in plant (Ding et al., 2021b; Liu et al., 2017b; Pan et al., 2017; Xin et al., 2010; Yu et al., 2012). Functional studies showed that the overexpression of miR156 improved HT tolerance in Arabidopsis and alfalfa seedlings by inducing the expression of HT stress response gene (Matthews et al., 2019; Stief et al., 2014). However, there are few reports on the role of miR156/SPL in plant male fertility under HT stress. Our previous study found that continuous HT would lead to anther indehiscence and pollen fertility decreased in soybean heat‐sensitive CMS‐based F1, and further study found that soybean miR156b and its target gene GmSPL2b were involved in the response to HT stress (Ding et al., 2020b, 2021b). Functional study showed that the overexpression of miR156b in Arabidopsis led to male sterility after HT stress (Ding et al., 2021b), but the specific regulatory mechanism still remains unclear.

ROS is induced by HT and has a negative effect on plant male fertility (Begcy et al., 2019; Djanaguiraman et al., 2018; Zhao et al., 2018). There are enzymatic and non‐enzymatic ROS scavenging systems in plants, including peroxidase (POD) and flavonoid, which play an important role in plant reproduction and development (Liu et al., 2018; Muhlemann et al., 2018; Zhao et al., 2018). In plant, SPL and heat shock factor (HSF) play an important role in ROS scavenging under abiotic stress during growth and development. It was found that BpSPL9 enhanced the salt tolerance of Betula platyphylla by participating in the regulation of enzymatic ROS scavenging system to remove ROS (Ning et al., 2017). Wang et al. (2020) found that MdHSFA8 promoted the accumulation of flavonoid by increasing the expression of flavonol synthetase (FLS), a flavonoid‐related gene, and effectively removed ROS in large quantities, thus improving the drought tolerance of apple seedlings. However, it remains unknown whether the miR156–SPL module regulates male fertility in plants under HT stress by regulating ROS scavenging system.

In this study, miR156b was found to be a negative regulator of male fertility of soybean CMS‐based restorer line and its hybrid F1 with CMS line under HT stress. Strikingly, we found that GmSPL2b, as one of the important target genes of miR156b, can directly regulate the expression of ROS scavenging genes such as GmHSFA6b. These results revealed the role of a novel ROS scavenging network mediated by the miR156b–GmSPL2b module in coordinating the regulation of male fertility in soybean under HT stress.

Results

Overexpression of miR156b decreased male fertility in CMS‐based restorer line under HT stress in soybean

Our previous small RNA sequencing data showed that miR156b was a heat‐responsive miRNAs in soybean CMS‐based F1 during flowering under HT stress (Ding et al., 2021b). To investigate whether miR156b plays any role in soybean male fertility regulation under HT stress, two soybean transgenic lines overexpressing miR156b were generated in Williams 82 (W82), a restorer line of soybean CMS line NJCMS1A (Figure 1a,b).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

miR156b overexpression decreased male fertility in soybean cytoplasmic male sterility (CMS)‐based restorer line under high‐temperature (HT) stress. (a) Phenotypic analysis of Williams 82 (W82, a restorer line of soybean CMS line NJCMS1A) and miR156bOE lines during seedling. Bar = 4 cm. (b) Relative expression levels of miR156b precursor and miR156b in W82 and miR156bOE lines. Three plant leaves of each genotype were used for quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR (qRT‐PCR). Data were shown as the mean ± Standard deviation (SD). Student's t‐test was used to identify significant differences; *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01. (c) Phenotype of anthers in W82 and miR156bOE lines under HT stress. The red and blue arrows indicated dehiscent anthers and indehiscent anthers, respectively. The anthers in the red and blue boxes on the right were enlarged anthers with red and blue arrows, respectively. Bar = 500 μm; d, days. (d–f) Pollen fertility in W82 and miR156bOE lines under HT stress. The pollen grain viability was determined using I2‐KI staining and haematoxylin staining in paraffin section. The red and blue arrows indicated fertile and sterile pollen, respectively. Pollen fertility rates of W82 and miR156bOE lines were the mean ± SD from three independent experiments (e). Values with different letter indicated statistical differences (one‐way ANOVA, Duncan's test, P < 0.05). Bars, 100 μm in (d); 20 μm in (f). NT, normal temperature.

Under normal temperature (NT) condition, there was no significant difference in male fertility between miR156b overexpression (miR156bOE) lines and W82 plants (Figure 1c,d). After HT treatment for 4 days, the anther of miR156bOE was dehiscent and the number of viable pollen grains was only about 25%, while the anther dehiscence of control W82 was normal and its number of viable pollen grains was about 40% higher than that of miR156bOE lines (Figure 1e). After HT treatment for 5 days, miR156bOE showed anther indehiscence and had no fertile pollen, but the anthers of W82 were still slightly dehiscent with about 30% fertile pollen (Figure 1c–e). Similar to the result of pollen I2‐KI staining, a transverse section was taken from the unopened flowers (the flowers that will open the next morning). Compared with W82, partial pollen grains of miR156bOE plants developed abnormally after 4 days of HT treatment, forming empty and shrivelled pollen (Figure 1f). After HT treatment for 5 days, all pollen grains of miR156bOE plants were shrivelled and had abnormal morphology, while only partial pollen grains of W82 developed abnormally.

Subsequently, we detected the germination of pollen in vitro under transient HT stress (Figure 2a,b). The germination rates of miR156bOE and W82 in vitro were about 95% under NT condition. However, HT only reduced the pollen viability of W82 by about 10%, while the pollen viability of miR156bOE lines decreased by 35%–40%. In addition, some pollen tubes of the miR156bOE lines were shorter than those of W82 under HT stress.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

miR156b overexpression decreased pollen germination in soybean CMS‐based restorer line and male fertility of its hybrid F1 with CMS line NJCMS1A. (a, b) Pollen germination in W82 and miR156bOE lines under HT stress. The red, black and blue arrows indicated pollen with germinating, shorter germinating and non‐germinating tubes, respectively. Bar = 100 μm. Pollen germination rates of W82 and miR156bOE lines were the mean ± SD from three independent experiments (b). Values with different letter indicated statistical differences (one‐way ANOVA, Duncan's test, P < 0.05). (c) Phenotypic analysis of (NJCMS1A × W82) F1 and (NJCMS1A × miR156bOE) F1 plants during seedling. Bar = 8 cm. (d) Phenotype of anthers in (NJCMS1A × W82) F1 and (NJCMS1A × miR156bOE) F1 plants under HT stress. The red and blue arrows indicated dehiscent anthers and indehiscent anthers, respectively. The anthers in the red and blue boxes on the right were enlarged anthers with red and blue arrows, respectively. Bar = 200 μm. (e, f) Pollen fertility in (NJCMS1A × W82) F1 and (NJCMS1A × miR156bOE) F1 plants under HT stress. The pollen grain viability was determined using I2‐KI staining. The red and blue arrows indicated fertile and sterile pollen, respectively. Bar = 100 μm. Pollen fertility rates of (NJCMS1A × W82) F1 and (NJCMS1A × miR156bOE) F1 were the mean ± SD from three independent experiments (f). Values with different letter indicated statistical differences (one‐way ANOVA, Duncan's test, P < 0.05). 1A, NJCMS1A.

In order to further understand whether miR156b is involved in the regulation of male fertility of soybean CMS‐based F1 under HT stress, we conducted a cross study between the CMS line NJCMS1A and miR156bOE lines. Similar to miR156bOE, the number of leaves in (NJCMS1A × miR156bOE) F1 was also increased compared to (NJCMS1A × W82) F1 (Figures 1a and 2c). Male fertility observation showed that the anthers of (NJCMS1A × miR156bOE) F1 and (NJCMS1A × W82) F1 were dehiscent and their pollen fertility rate was about 50% under NT condition (Figure 2d–f). The HT treatment results showed that (NJCMS1A × miR156bOE) F1 was more sensitive to HT than (NJCMS1A × W82) F1 and their male parent miR156bOE lines (Figures 1c–e and 2d–f). After HT treatment for 2 days, the pollen fertility rate of (NJCMS1A × miR156bOE) F1 decreased sharply, only about 12%–26%. After HT treatment for 3 days, (NJCMS1A × miR156bOE) F1 showed anther indehiscence and almost completely male sterility, while (NJCMS1A × W82) F1 remained anther dehiscence and its pollen fertility rate was about 30%. All results indicated that miR156b negatively regulated the male fertility of soybean CMS‐based restorer line under HT stress.

Overexpression of miR156b inhibited the expression of pollen development and HT response related genes under HT stress in soybean

To further elucidate the regulatory network of miR156b, we performed transcriptome sequencing of miR156bOE‐1 under both NT and HT conditions (W82 as the control). RNA sequencing (RNA‐seq) data revealed that more than 3500 genes were differentially expressed in flower buds of miR156bOE‐1 and W82 under HT stress compared to those under NT condition (Figure S1; Tables S1 and S2). Most differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were down‐regulated in miR156bOE‐1NT vs miR156bOE‐1HT combination, unlike most of the DEGs were up‐regulated in W82NT vs W82HT combination (Figure S1, Tables S1 and S2). Similarly, more than 70% of the DEGs (219) were down‐regulated in flower bud of miR156bOE‐1 compared to W82 under HT stress (Figure 3a, Tables S3 and S4). Then, the DEGs in the W82HT vs miR156bOE‐1HT combination were subjected to gene ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analysis. Functional annotation of DEGs revealed that overexpression of miR156b affected multiple molecular function and biological processes related to gene expression regulation, plant growth and stress responses, including transcription regulator activity, antioxidant activity, reproduction and reproductive process (Figure S2). A KEGG pathway analysis showed that the DEGs were mainly related to the pentose and glucuronate interconversions and the protein processing in endoplasmic reticulum (Figure 3b).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

The classification of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in the flower buds of W82 and miR156bOE lines under HT stress. (a) Volcano plot of DEGs between W82 and miR156bOE lines under HT stress. Red dots, green dots and black dots indicated DEGs that were up‐regulated, down‐regulated and no significant difference in expression, respectively. (b) Top 20 of pathway enrichment. The x‐axis indicated the rich factor corresponding to each pathway, and the y‐axis indicated name of the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway. The colour of the point represented the P‐values of the enrichment analysis. The size and colour of bubbles represented the number and degree of enrichment of DEGs, respectively. (c, d) Promoter structure and expression level in representative DEGs. The heat map was conducted using MeV 4.9 software. The FPKM values were obtained from the RNA‐seq data. (e) Validation of the expression levels of selecting DEGs by qRT‐PCR analysis. Data were shown with the mean ± SD from three independent experiments.

In W82HT vs miR156bOE‐1HT combination, some DEGs were related to the flavonoid and phenylpropanoid biosynthesis, including FLS1 and peroxidase 5‐like (POD5‐like) (Figure 3c). Further analysis indicated that most of the DEGs related to carbon metabolism and sugar transport were down‐regulated, such as pectinesterase/pectinesterase inhibitor‐like (PE/PEI‐like), pectinesterase‐like (PE‐like), pectate lyase‐like (PL), polygalacturonase (PG), exopolygalacturonase (Exo‐PG), sugar transport protein 10‐like (STP10‐like) and sucrose transport protein SUC8‐like (SUC8‐like) (Figure 3c). In addition, genes related to plant hormone signal transduction, pollen development and HT stress, such as auxin‐induced protein AUX22 (AUX22), pollen receptor‐like kinase 3 (PRK3), pollen‐specific leucine‐rich repeat extensin‐like protein 1 (PLREP), calcium‐dependent protein kinase 17‐like (CDPK17‐like), heat shock factor A6b (HSFA6b), small heat shock protein (sHSP) and heat shock protein 83 (HSP83), underwent a reduction in expression in miR156bOE‐1 under HT compared to W82 (Figure 3c,d). Nearly all of the above‐mentioned DEGs (except HSP17.9) had ≥1 GTAC motif (SBP‐binding element) in their promoters (Figure 3c,d). Most importantly, many of them were highly expressed in flower of soybean (Figure S3), such as FLS1, CDPK17‐like, POD5‐like, carbon metabolism, sugar transport and pollen development‐related DEGs. To verify the RNA‐Seq data, 11 of them were selected for quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR (qRT‐PCR) analysis, and the coincidence rate between qRT‐PCR and RNA‐seq was 100% (Figure 3e).

Overexpression of miR156b altered flavonoid accumulation in soybean CMS‐based restorer line under HT stress

To further illustrate the mechanism of miR156b in regulating male fertility of soybean CMS‐based restorer line under HT stress, a widely targeted metabolome study was performed using the flower buds of miR156bOE‐1 and W82 under both NT and HT conditions. A total of 1026 metabolites were detected in the flower buds of miR156bOE‐1 and W82, including 11 classes of metabolites, among which flavonoid was the most abundant class metabolite (Figure S4). Approximately 243 metabolites showed differences (¦fold change (FC)¦ ≥ 2, variable importance in project (VIP) ≥ 1) between miR156bOE‐1 and W82 in four combinations (W82NT vs miR156bOE‐1NT, miR156bOE‐1NT vs miR156bOE‐1HT, W82NT vs W82HT and W82HT vs miR156bOE‐1HT) (Figure 4a, Tables S5–S8). Of these, 18 metabolites were down‐regulated and 10 were up‐regulated in miR156bOE‐1 compared to W82 under HT stress (Figure 4b). Most importantly, one third of them was flavonoid. KEGG data also showed that differential metabolites involved in flavonoid metabolic pathway (isoflavonoid biosynthesis, flavonoid biosynthesis, flavone and flavonol biosynthesis) were enriched in W82HT vs miR156bOE‐1HT comparison (Figure S5). In particular, the amount of five (six in total) flavonoids in the flower buds of both miR156bOE‐1 and W82 was induced by HT stress (Figure 4c). Interestingly, four of them were down‐regulated in miR156bOE‐1 under both NT and HT conditions compared to W82. Given that most of the differential flavonoids were down‐regulated in miR156bOE‐1HT, this indicated that miR156b altered the biosynthesis and accumulation of flavonoid in the flower bud of soybean CMS‐based restorer line under HT stress.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

The classification of differential metabolites in the flower buds of W82 and miR156bOE lines under HT stress. (a) Venn diagram of up‐ and down‐regulated differential metabolites in W82 and miR156bOE lines under NT and HT conditions. (b) Heat map of the differential metabolites in the flower buds of W82 and miR156bOE lines under HT stress. The heat map was conducted using MeV 4.9 software. The content value of differential metabolites was obtained from the metabolomic data. Different colours were values obtained after standardized treatment of relative content (red represented high content, green represented low content). (c–e) Differential flavonoid content and related gene expression levels in the flower buds of W82 and miR156bOE lines under HT stress. Data were shown with the mean ± SD from three independent experiments. The content value of differential flavonoid was obtained from the metabolomic data. The expression levels of GmFLS1 and GmCHI in the flower buds of W82 and miR156bOE lines under HT stress were obtained from RNA‐seq and qRT‐PCR analysis. Data were shown with the mean ± SD from three independent experiments. Values with different letter indicated statistical differences (one‐way ANOVA, Duncan's test, P < 0.05). (f) Flavonoid biosynthesis pathway in the flower buds of W82 and miR156bOE lines under HT stress by KEGG analysis. Down‐regulated genes and metabolite were marked in green.

We then examined the expression of genes involved in flavonoid metabolic pathway in miR156bOE lines. The transcript levels of two flavonoid metabolism‐related genes, including GmFLS1 (Glyma.05G088100) and GmCHI (Glyma.10G29220), were down‐regulated in miR156bOE‐1HT compared to W82HT (Figure 4d,e). Through promoter analysis, 2 GTAC motifs were found in the promoter region of the GmFLS1, but not in the promoter region of GmCHI (Figure 3c). Therefore, the miR156b–SPL module may directly or indirectly participate in flavonoid metabolism by regulating the expression of GmFLS1 and GmCHI genes, thus regulating the male fertility of soybean CMS‐based restorer line under HT stress (Figure 4f).

GmSPL2b knockout increased HT susceptibility in soybean CMS‐based restorer line during flowering

miR156 mainly plays its role by negatively regulating its target genes that encoding SPL, which have miR156‐binding sites (Lei and Liu, 2016). Our previous studies found that 20 GmSPLs were targeted by miR156b, and miR156b negatively regulated GmSPL2b during flowering in soybean CMS‐based F1 under HT stress (Ding et al., 2020b, 2021b). Furthermore, GmSPL2b was down‐regulated in miR156bOE plants under both NT and HT conditions (Figure 5a). To better understand the function of GmSPL2b, a bioinformatics analysis on GmSPL2b was carried out first. GmSPL2b encodes a long peptide containing 433 amino acids, and amino acid sequence alignment revealed that GmSPL2b has a typical domains of SPL, including two Zn‐finger‐like structures (Zn1 and Zn2) and a nuclear localization signal (NLS) (Figure 5b,c). Phylogenetic analysis showed that GmSPL2b had high sequence identity with SPL2 or SPL12 in Medicago truncatula and Vigna unguiculata, etc (Figure 5d). Subcellular localization analysis revealed that the 35S::GmSPL2b–GFP fusion protein was exclusively localized in the nucleus, which was consistent with its predicted NLS domain (Figure 5b,e). GUS staining of the pGmSPL2b::GUS‐transformed Arabidopsis confirmed that GmSPL2b was expressed in anthers of inflorescence during flowering (Figure 5f), suggesting that GmSPL2b plays an important role in regulating pollen development. Furthermore, the transcription activity assay found that the Y2H strain containing BD‐GmSPL2b could grow on both SD/−Trp and SD/−Trp/−His/−Ade culture medium (Figure 5g), indicating that GmSPL2b has transcriptional activation activity and can bind with the promoter element of downstream regulatory gene to regulate its transcriptional process.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

GmSPL2b transcription factor analysis. (a) Relative expression level of GmSPL2b in flower buds of W82 and miR156bOE lines. Data were shown with the mean ± SD from three independent experiments. Values with different letters indicated statistical differences (one‐way ANOVA, Duncan's test, P < 0.05). (b) Amino acid sequence alignment of GmSPL2b and its homologues in Medicago truncatula, Arabidopsis thaliana and Glycine soja. Red box region indicated the SBP‐box domain. (c) Sequence logo of the SBP‐box domain. (d) Phylogenetic tree analysis of SPL in multiple plant species. The phylogenetic tree was constructed using MEGA 5.02 based on the neighbour‐joining method. Bootstrap values in percentage (1000 replicates) were labelled on the nodes. (e) Subcellular localization of GmSPL2b. Bar = 20 μm. (f) pGmSPL2b::GUS expression pattern in inflorescence with developing flower buds during flowering in Arabidopsis. Bar = 1 mm. (g) Transcriptional activity of GmSPL2b protein.

To further investigate the putative biological function of GmSPL2b in regulating male fertility of soybean CMS‐based restorer line under HT stress, we employed CRISPR/Cas9 method to knockout GmSPL2b and obtained gmspl2b mutants with deletion of 14 bp, 10 bp, 5 bp and 7 bp (Figure 6a,b). All mutation types of gmspl2b resulted in a frame‐shift with premature termination of GmSPL2b translation and loss of SBP functional domain (Figure 6c). A 10‐bp deletion of gmspl2b‐1 and a 5‐bp deletion of gmspl2b‐2 homozygous single mutants were selected for subsequent experiments (Figure 6d). Male fertility of the three materials including W82 was normal under NT condition (Figure 6e–g). The pollen fertility rate of gmspl2b mutants and W82 decreased gradually with the extension of HT treatment time, but the pollen fertility of gmspl2b mutants was lower than that of W82 (Figure 6f,g). However, unlike miR156bOE lines, gmspl2b mutants did not exhibit an anther indehiscence phenotype until after 5 days of HT treatment (Figures 1c and 6e), indicating that GmSPL2b may be only one of the target genes of miR156b involved in the regulation of male fertility in soybean CMS‐based restorer line under HT stress. Furthermore, qRT‐PCR analysis found that the HSP‐related genes, including GmHSP17.6 (Glyma.04G054400) and GmHSP83 (Glyma.16G178800), were also down‐regulated in gmspl2b mutants under HT stress (Figure 6h), indicating that they may be directly or indirectly regulated by GmSPL2b.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

Knockout of GmSPL2b decreased male fertility in soybean CMS‐based restorer line under HT stress. (a) Targeted editing of GmSPL2b using CRISPR/Cas9. Upper part: the structure of sgRNAs. GmU6pro, promoter of GmU3; GmU6pro, promoter of GmU6. Lower part: schematic diagram of the target position design of GmSPL2b. The locations and sequences of the sgRNA targets were indicated along with the position of the protospacer adjacent motif (PAM, red underline), target sequences and GC% content. (b) Sequences of selected CRISPR/Cas9‐induced mutations in T1 transgenic plants (PAM in red underline and green background). (c) The protein structure changes in different mutants induced by CRISPR/Cas9. (d) Phenotypic analysis of W82, gmspl2b mutants during seedling. Bar = 6 cm. (e) Phenotype of anthers in W82 and gmspl2b mutants under HT stress. The red and blue arrows indicated dehiscent anthers and indehiscent anthers, respectively. The anthers in the red and blue boxes on the right were enlarged anthers with red and blue arrows, respectively. Bar = 200 μm. (f, g) Pollen fertility in W82 and gmspl2b mutants under HT stress. The pollen grain viability was determined by I2‐KI staining. The red and blue arrows indicated fertile and sterile pollen, respectively. Bar = 100 μm. Pollen fertility rates of W82 and gmspl2b mutants were the mean ± SD from three independent experiments (g). Values with different letter indicated statistical differences (one‐way ANOVA, Duncan's test, P < 0.05). (h) Relative expression levels of GmHSP17.6 and GmHSP83 in flower buds of W82 and gmspl2b mutants. Data were shown with the mean ± SD from three independent experiments. Values with different letter indicated statistical differences (one‐way ANOVA, Duncan's test, P < 0.05).

ROS metabolism in anthers of miR156bOE and gmspl2b was disturbed under HT stress in soybean

ROS is closely related to male fertility of plants under HT stress (Begcy et al., 2019; Djanaguiraman et al., 2018; Zhao et al., 2018). Thus, the ROS staining of anthers was performed in miR156bOE, gmspl2b and W82 under NT and HT conditions (Figure 7a,b). The 5‐(and 6)‐chroromethyl‐2′,7′‐dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (CM‐H2DCFDA) staining showed that the ROS content in W82 anthers was higher than that of miR156bOE and gmspl2b mutants under NT. Then, the ROS accumulation decreased in W82HT compared to W82NT. However, more ROS accumulation was found in miR156bOEHT compared to either W82HT or miR156OENT. Under HT stress, the ROS content in anthers of gmspl2b mutants increased compared to NT condition, but only slightly increased compared to W82HT, without reaching a significant difference level. This may be because GmSPL2b is only one of the target genes of miR156b involved in male fertility of soybean under HT stress. Intriguingly, our RNA‐seq found that two other SPLs, GmSPL4a and GmSPL4b (namely GmSPL12e and GmSPL12d in Ding et al., 2020b), were down‐regulated in miR156bOE plants under both NT and HT conditions (Figure S6a,b). Furthermore, they are targeted by miR156b via degradome analysis (Figure S6c,d; Ding et al., 2019b). Similar to GmSPL2b, GmSPL4a/b were also highly expressed in flower of soybean (Figure S6e; Phytozome 13). The difference is that the target site of miR156b is located in the CDS region of GmSPL2b, but in the 3′UTR of GmSPL4a/b (Ding et al., 2020b).

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Open in a new tab

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) and GmFLS1 expression studies in W82, miR156bOE lines and gmspl2b mutants under HT stress. (a) ROS staining of anthers in W82, miR156bOE lines and gmspl2b mutants under HT stress. Bar = 250 μm. (b) Quantification of DCF fluorescence in anthers of W82, miR156bOE lines and gmspl2b mutants. Data were shown with the mean ± SD from three independent experiments (n = 15–20 anthers/genotype/experiment). Values with different letter indicated statistical differences (one‐way ANOVA, Duncan's test, P < 0.05). (c) Relative expression level of GmFLS1 in flower buds of W82 and gmspl2b mutants under HT stress. Data were shown with the mean ± SD from three independent experiments. Values with different letter indicated statistical differences (one‐way ANOVA, Duncan's test, P < 0.05).

Considering that miR156b was participated in the regulation of flavonoid metabolism (Figures 3c,e and 4), flavonoid was involved in ROS clearance during plant flowering under HT stress (Muhlemann et al., 2018). We analysed the expression level of GmFLS1 in the gmspl2b mutants and found it was also down‐regulated in flower buds of gmspl2b mutants compared to W82 (Figure 7c). All these results suggested that miR156b–GmSPL2b may be involved in ROS clearance by mediating the expression of flavonoid metabolism genes, thereby regulating the male fertility of soybean CMS‐based restorer line under HT stress.

GmHSFA6b acted as one of the downstream regulatory genes of miR156b–GmSPL2b module

Previous experimental results showed that the male fertility of miR156bOE lines and gmspl2b mutants was highly sensitive to HT, and GmHSFA6b was down‐regulated in miR156bOE lines (Figure 3e). Since HSFA family members are important factors that activate the protective mechanism of plant male organs during flowering under HT stress (Fragkostefanakis et al., 2016; Giorno et al., 2010), we decided to investigate whether GmHSFA6b contributes to the regulation of plant male fertility under HT stress. Furthermore, four GTAC motifs (F1–F4) were found in the promoter of GmHSFA6b, and qRT‐PCR analysis confirmed that GmHSFA6b was down‐regulated in gmspl2b mutants (Figure 8a,b). All these data suggested that GmHSFA6b might act as a downstream regulatory gene of miR156b–GmSPL2b module under HT stress.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Open in a new tab

GmSPL2b bound to the GmHSFA6b promoter and activated its expression. (a) Schematic diagram of the GmHSFA6b promoter with four GTAC motifs within a 2‐kb region upstream of the ATG. (b) Relative expression level of GmHSFA6b in flower buds of W82 and gmspl2b mutants under HT stress. Data were shown with the mean ± SD from three independent experiments. Values with different letter indicated statistical differences (one‐way ANOVA, Duncan's test, P < 0.05). (c) Y1H assay of GmSPL2b binding to the GmHSFA6b promoter. Yeast cells from serial dilutions (1, 1:10 and 1:100) were grown on SD/−Leu/−Ura medium supplemented with 100 ng/mL Aureobasidin A (AbA). The empty pGADT7 vector was used as negative control. (d) GmSPL2b activated the promoter activity of GmHSFA6b as revealed from the luciferase activity assay in tobacco leaves.

Next, the interaction between GmSPL2b and the GmHSFA6b promoter was detected by yeast one hybrid (Y1H) assay. A 42‐bp fragment containing three copies of F1–F4 (GTAC) with 5‐bp promoter sequence on both sides was cloned into the pAbAi vector and used as bait, respectively, while GmSPL2b was used as prey. However, self‐activation detection found that F4 bait had strong self‐activation ability (Figure S7). Moreover, Y1H assay found that GmSPL2b can specifically bind F1 and F3 (Figure 8c). We then validated the activation of GmSPL2b to GmHSFA6b gene using a transient luciferase (LUC) complementation imaging assay in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) leaves. Luminescence detection revealed that the fluorescence intensity of 35S::GmSPL2b coexpressed with pGmHSFA6b::LUC was significantly stronger than that of the control (Figure 8d). These results suggested that GmSPL2b activated the expression of GmHSFA6b by directly binding to its promoter.

Overexpression of GmHSFA6b conferred HT tolerance in Arabidopsis during flowering

To further confirm the role of GmHSFA6b in the regulation of plant male fertility under HT stress, two independent GmHSFA6bOE transgenic Arabidopsis lines were selected for HT treatment (Figure 9a). Both GmHSFA6bOE transgenic Arabidopsis lines and wild‐type (WT) were exposed in an incubator at 42 °C for 4.5 h, and observed the male fertility within next 6 days after HT stress, mainly including anther dehiscence and pollen fertility. On the second day after HT treatment, the GmHSFA6bOE plants showed anther dehiscence with pollen shrinkage slightly (Figure 9b–d). On the sixth day after HT treatment, the GmHSFA6bOE plants showed a little pollen abortion. However, the WT showed pollen deformity (shrinkage greatly and the red colour is lighter) with anther indehiscence and most pollen abortion on the second and sixth day after HT treatment, respectively (Figure 9b–d). The nitro blue tetrazolium (NBT) and CM‐H2DCFDA staining showed that the ROS content in inflorescence of GmHSFA6bOE transgenic Arabidopsis lines was lower than that of WT under both NT and HT conditions (Figure 9e,f). All these results revealed that the miR156b–GmSPL2b–GmHSFA6b module might regulate plant male fertility through ROS metabolic pathway under HT stress.

Figure 9.

Figure 9

Open in a new tab

Male fertility and ROS study in wild‐type (WT) and GmHSFA6bOE transgenic Arabidopsis lines under HT stress. (a) Relative expression of GmHSFA6b in inflorescence of WT and GmHSFA6bOE transgenic Arabidopsis lines. Data were shown with the mean ± SD from three independent experiments. Student's t‐test was used to identify significant differences; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001. (b) Phenotype of anthers in WT and GmHSFA6bOE transgenic Arabidopsis lines under HT stress. The red and blue arrows indicated dehiscent and indehiscent anthers, respectively. Bar = 200 μm. (c, d) Pollen fertility in WT and GmHSFA6bOE transgenic Arabidopsis lines under HT stress. The white and blue arrows indicated fertile and sterile pollen, respectively. Bar = 100 μm. Pollen fertility rates of WT and GmHSFA6bOE transgenic Arabidopsis lines were the mean ± SD from three independent experiments (c). Values with different letter indicated statistical differences (one‐way ANOVA, Duncan's test, P < 0.05). (e, f) ROS content detection in inflorescences of WT and GmHSFA6bOE transgenic Arabidopsis lines using NBT and CM‐H2DCFDA staining. Bar = 2 mm.

Discussion

miR156b–GmSPL2b was one of the key module for regulating male fertility of soybean CMS‐based restorer line under HT stress

The miR156–SPL module plays an important role in the development regulation of flowering time, plant architecture and nodulation of soybean (Cao et al., 2015; Sun et al., 2019b; Yun et al., 2022). It was also found that miR156 had different responses to HT at different developmental stages of plants, and it was mainly up‐regulated by HT stress at seedling stage of wheat (Xin et al., 2010), cabbage (Yu et al., 2012), tomato (Zhou et al., 2016) and maize (He et al., 2019). Meanwhile, HT can reduce the expression of SPL by inducing the expression level of miR156, and then induced the production of HSPs, thus enhancing the HT tolerance of Arabidopsis and alfalfa at seedling stage (Matthews et al., 2019; Stief et al., 2014). Contrary to seedling stage, miR156 was mainly inhibited by HT stress at flowering stage (Li et al., 2015; Liu et al., 2017b; Pan et al., 2017). Pan et al. (2017) conducted small RNA sequencing and qRT‐PCR analysis on tomato stamens under normal condition and HT treatment, and found that miR156e and its target gene SPL15 showed negative regulation at the expression level. However, only one material was used in this study. The relationship between miR156e–SPL15 module and male fertility of tomato under HT stress is not clear. Our previous study found that soybean miR156b and its target gene GmSPL2b not only had a negative regulatory relationship in the flower buds of soybean HT‐tolerant CMS‐based F1 before and after HT treatment, but also had the same relationship between HT‐tolerant CMS‐based F1 and HT‐sensitive CMS‐based F1 under HT treatment (Ding et al., 2021b). In addition, the expression level of miR156b in HT‐sensitive CMS‐based F1 was higher than that in HT‐tolerant CMS‐based F1 under HT stress. Furthermore, our previous study found that the miR156bOE transgenic Arabidopsis showed male sterility after HT treatment (Ding et al., 2021b). However, the mechanism of miR156b–GmSPL2b module regulating the male fertility of soybean CMS‐based restorer line under HT stress remains unclear.

In this study, we showed that miR156b negatively regulated male fertility in soybean CMS‐based restorer line under HT stress, and GmSPL2b was down‐regulated in miR156bOE transgenic soybean under both NT and HT conditions (Figures 1, 2 and 5a). Previously, we showed that GmSPL2b was highly expressed in flower buds of soybean during flowering (Ding et al., 2020b). In addition, Wang et al. (2016) found that the reduced transcription of its AtSPL2 homologue in Arabidopsis was similar to the phenotype of miR156 transgenic Arabidopsis (anther size and the amount of pollen grains per anther decreased). Moreover, knocking out GmSPL2b also reduced the pollen fertility rate of soybean CMS‐based restorer line under HT stress (Figure 6e–g). However, there was still a certain gap between gmspl2b mutants and miR156bOE lines under HT stress, both in terms of pollen fertility rate/anther dehiscence or ROS content in anthers under HT treatment (Figures 1c–f, 6e–g and 7a,b). Intriguingly, in addition to GmSPL2b, two other SPLs, GmSPL4a and GmSPL4b, were down‐regulated in miR156bOE plants under both NT and HT conditions (Figure S6a,b). Furthermore, they were targeted by miR156b via degradome analysis (Figure S6c,d; Ding et al., 2019b). Thus, GmSPL2b may act as one of the target genes of miR156b regulating male fertility of soybean CMS‐based restorer line under HT stress. It cannot be ruled out that GmSPL4a/b may play a synergistic role in the regulation of male fertility of soybean CMS‐based restorer line under HT stress, which needs further study.

HSF exists widely in plants and is one of the transcription factors (TFs) that play an important role in response to HT stress during reproductive development (Ding et al., 2020a; Fragkostefanakis et al., 2016; Giorno et al., 2010). In this study, GmHSFA6b was down‐regulated in miR156bOE lines and gmspl2b mutants under HT stress (Figures 3e and 8b). Since GmHSFA6b promoter (2 kb in length) contains four GTAC motifs bounded by SPL TF (Figure 8a), it is generally assumed that miR156b–GmSPL2b module may play a role in the regulation of male fertility in soybean CMS‐based restorer line under HT stress by regulating GmHSFA6b. Importantly, we proved that GmSPL2b is a transcriptional activating nuclear protein that can directly bind to the promoter of GmHSFA6b (Figures 5g and 8). Furthermore, overexpression of GmHSFA6b in Arabidopsis conferred its HT tolerance during flowering (Figure 9). Hence, this research disclosed a novel mechanism wherein the miR156b–GmSPL2b module regulates male fertility of soybean CMS‐based restorer line under HT stress by activating GmHSFA6b. In addition, gene cloning, sequence alignment and bioinformatics analysis showed that the promoter core elements and precursor/CDS sequences of miR156b, GmSPL2b and GmHSFA6b were identical in both HT resistant and sensitive restorer lines, although their promoter sequences were slightly different in the two materials (Figures S8–S10). These results indicated that miR156b regulated the male fertility of soybean restorer line under HT stress by regulating GmSPL2b–GmHSFA6b, and there may be different regulatory factors in the upstream of miR156b, resulting in the different expression trends of miR156b between the two materials. Further study is needed to determine the upstream regulatory factors of miR156b.

The normal development of plant anther and pollen requires the participation of many types of genes, such as anther/pollen development, sugar transport and calcium signalling transduction related genes. The abnormal expression of any one of above genes may lead to male sterility in plants. For example, BcPLL9 and CsSUT1 were found to regulate anther pectin metabolism and sugar transporter in Brassica campestris and cucumber, respectively, and their down‐regulation resulted in male semi‐sterility or sterility in plants (Jiang et al., 2014; Sun et al., 2019a). Our previous research also found that genes related to anther/pollen development and sugar transport were closely related to male fertility development of soybean CMS‐based F1 under HT stress (Ding et al., 2020b). In Arabidopsis, the double disruption of CPK17/34 disrupts the pollen transmission (Myers et al., 2009). In rice, the RNA interference of OsCPK9 leads to the reduction of pollen fertility rate (Wei et al., 2014). Here, we found that many of their homologous genes in soybean were also down‐regulated in miR156bOE lines compared to W82 under HT stress, such as GmPME, GmExo‐PG, GmSUC8 and GmCDPK17 (Figures 3c). Furthermore, there was at least one SPL‐binding site in the promoter of these DEGs (Figure 3c). However, whether miR156b regulates the expression of these DEG through GmSPL2b remains to be further investigated.

HSPs are a group of chaperone proteins that control the folding/unfolding of substrate proteins and the degradation of misfolded/denatured proteins under HT stress (Singh et al., 2016; Sun et al., 2021b). In this study, 11 HSP20 family members and 1 HSP83 gene were induced by HT in both miR156bOE lines and W82, but all of them were down‐regulated in miR156bOE under HT compared to W82 (Figure 3d). The qRT‐PCR analysis found that some of them were also down‐regulated in gmspl2b mutants under HT compared to W82 (Figure 6h). So we speculated that the decreased pollen fertility rate of miR156bOE and gmspl2b mutants under HT stress might be related to the down‐regulation of these HSP genes. Just as previous studies have shown that HSPs play an important role in the regulation of HT tolerance in plants (Yang et al., 2017; Zhai et al., 2016), and overexpression of GmHSP20a could improve the HT resistance of Arabidopsis during flowering (Ding et al., 2020a). Interestingly, there were many GTAC and HSE motifs in the promoters of these HSPs (Figure 3d), which can be bound by SPL and HSF, respectively. However, whether the expression of these HSPs in miR156bOE, gmspl2b mutants and W82 is regulated by GmSPL2b or GmHSFA6b remains to be investigated.

miR156b–GmSPL2b module involved in the plant male fertility regulation under HT stress by regulating ROS metabolism

HT can cause a large amount of ROS produced by mitochondria in reproductive organs, and the abnormal accumulation of ROS is one of the direct causes of male sterility in plants (Begcy et al., 2019; Djanaguiraman et al., 2018; Zhao et al., 2018). After sensing HT signals in the environment, plants can induce gene (including miRNA and its target genes) changes at transcription and post‐transcription levels through related signal transduction pathways to activate the ROS scavenging system in vivo, thus effectively eliminating intracellular ROS and reducing damage to male reproductive organs (Chen et al., 2020; Liu et al., 2017a). It is well known that plants have enzymatic ROS scavenging system including antioxidant enzymes such as POD, as well as non‐enzymatic ROS scavenging system including antioxidant substances such as flavonoid, which play important roles in plant reproduction and development (Liu et al., 2018; Muhlemann et al., 2018; Zhao et al., 2018). In this study, the miR156bOE presented with higher amount of ROS but with lower content of flavonoid compared to W82 under HT stress (Figures 4 and 7). Interestingly, GmFLS1, a gene involved in flavonoid biosynthesis, was down‐regulated in the flower buds of miR156bOE lines and gmspl2b mutants under HT stress (Figures 3e and 7c). Recent studies have shown that transcription factor MYB21 can activate the expression of flavonol synthesis gene FLS1 in anther and pollen of Freesia and Arabidopsis, mediating ROS clearance and male fertility regulation (Shan et al., 2020; Zhang et al., 2021). Meanwhile, some studies have shown that flavonol can reduce ROS accumulation induced by HT stress and enhanced the tolerance of tomato to HT during reproductive development (Muhlemann et al., 2018; Paupière et al., 2017; Rutley et al., 2021). Moreover, there were GTAC motifs in the promoter of GmFLS1 (Figure 3c), and we speculated that miR156b–GmSPL2b may regulate ROS accumulation by regulating the expression of GmFLS1, thus participating in the regulation of male fertility in soybean CMS‐based restorer line under HT stress (Figure S11).

Intriguingly, we found that the inflorescence of GmHSFA6bOE transgenic Arabidopsis accumulated lower content of ROS under HT stress (Figure 9e,f), suggesting that GmHSFA6b may be involved in ROS clearance, thus improving the HT tolerance of transgenic Arabidopsis. Wang et al. (2020) found HSFA8a could increase the expression of flavonoid synthesis genes MYB12, ANS and FLS to promote the accumulation of flavonoid, thus effectively eliminating ROS and improving the drought tolerance of apple seedlings. In addition, Feng et al. (2019) found that sHSP positively regulates plant resistance to HT stress during seedling by regulating enzymatic ROS scavenging system. Considering the existence of HSE elements (‐nGAAnnTTC‐) in promoters of some differentially expressed sHSPs in this study (Figure 3d), they may be regulated by GmHSFA6b. These results suggested that GmHSFA6b may positively regulate male fertility in soybean CMS‐based restorer line under HT stress through the flavonoid–ROS pathway (Figure S11). Given that the promoter of GmHSFA6b also has SPL‐binding sites (Figure 8a), we concluded that the miR156b–GmSPL2b module may play its role in regulating male fertility in soybean CMS‐based restorer line under HT stress by directly activating the expression of GmHSFA6b. Further research will be helpful to dissect the molecular mechanism of miR156b–GmSPL2b–flavonoid–ROS pathway involved in the regulation of male fertility in soybean CMS‐based restorer line under HT stress.

In summary, our study found that miR156b–GmSPL2b module plays an important role in regulating male fertility in soybean CMS‐based restorer line under HT stress. Based on our findings, we proposed a model that miR156b mediated male fertility of soybean CMS‐based restorer line by regulating GmSPL2b. Due to GmSPL2b acted as a transcriptional activator, its degradation will lead to the down‐regulation of downstream regulatory genes, including GmHSFA6b, GmFLS1, GmPOD5, carbon metabolism and sugar transport related genes, which interfered the ROS scavenging and anther/pollen development, respectively, and ultimately led to abnormal male fertility in soybean CMS‐based restorer line (Figure S11). As the other two target genes of miR156b, GmSPL4a/b may also play the same role as GmSPL2b in this process. Furthermore, we can precisely manipulate the miR156b‐binding site in GmSPL2b in the future, or use the related gene resources in miR156b–GmSPL2b pathway as fertility enhancer genes to create HT‐tolerant strong restorer lines, so as to cultivate excellent new CMS‐based hybrid soybean varieties with stable male fertility.

Materials and methods

Plant materials and HT treatment

Soybean CMS line NJCMS1A (Ding et al., 1999, 2002; Gai et al., 1995) and its restore line N4608, YY6 (Ding et al., 2020a), W82, two miR156bOE lines #1 and #2, two GmSPL2b knockout lines #1 and #2, (NJCMS1A × W82) F1 and (NJCMS1A × miR156bOE) F1 were grown in an illuminated incubator (RXZ‐430D, Ningbojiangnan, Ningbo, China) at 26/20 °C with a 12 h/12 h (light/dark) photoperiod and 70% relative humidity during seedling. The hybridization between the CMS line NJCMS1A and miR156bOE lines/W82 was carried out in the greenhouse of Nanjing Agricultural University. For HT treatment, the flowering plants (R1 stage) of W82 and transgenic lines/F1 plants were incubated at 40 °C/34 °C with a 12 h/12 h (light/dark) photoperiod and 70% relative humidity in an illuminated incubator and maintained for 3–5 day. All types were grown at 30 °C/24 °C (12 h light/12 h dark) as control. Flower buds of each genotype (miR156bOE, W82, gmspl2b mutant) were collected from three individual plants as three independent biological replicates under NT and HT, respectively, and then frozen in liquid nitrogen immediately and stored at −80 °C for further use.

Nicotiana benthamiana was used for subcellular localization and dual‐luciferase (LUC) assay. The Arabidopsis thaliana Columbia (Col‐0) ecotype was used for pGmSPL2b::GUS and GmHSFA6b genetic transformation and WT. They were grown under long‐day conditions (16 h light/8 h dark) in an illuminated incubator (RXZ‐430D, Ningbo Jiangnan, Ningbo, China) at 23 °C as previously described (Ding et al., 2020a). The HT treatment on male fertility of GmHSFA6b transgenic Arabidopsis and WT was performed in an illuminated incubator (RXZ‐430D, Ningbo Jiangnan, Ningbo, China) at 42 °C for 4.5 h and then transferred to normal growth condition, according to Kim et al. (2001) described with minor modification. All types were grown at 23 °C as control.

Gene sequence comparison and bioinformatics analysis

The DNA and total RNA from the flower buds of soybean cultivar N4608 and YY6 were isolated using the Plant Genomic DNA Extraction Kit (TIANGEN, Beijing, China) and TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, United States) according to the manufacturer's introductions. The miR156b precursor, and promoters (2000 bp) of miR156b precursor, GmSPL2b (Glyma.18G005600) and GmHSFA6b (Glyma.10G029600) were cloned from DNA of soybean cultivar N4608 and YY6. The full‐length CDS regions of GmSPL2b and GmHSFA6b were cloned from cDNA of soybean cultivar N4608 and YY6. All primers used for PCR are listed in Table S9. The multiple sequence alignment of the gene nucleotide and amino acid sequences was generated using the DNAMAN. The WebLogo (http://weblogo.berkeley.edu/logo.cgi) tool was used to generate an SBP‐box domain logo. The phylogenetic tree of SPL2 was constructed using MEGA (version 5.02; Tamura et al., 2011) by the neighbour‐joining method with 1000 bootstrap repetitions. The FPKM values of DEGs between miR156bOE‐1 and W82 in soybean root, stem, leaf and flower tissues were obtained from the RNA‐seq data in Phytozome v13.0 (https://phytozome.jgi.doe.gov/pz/portal.html#), and the heat map was conducted using MeV 4.9 software. The promoter sequences of DEGs in RNA‐seq between miR156bOE‐1 and W82 were obtained from the NCBI database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/). The regulatory elements in the promoters of miR156b precursor, GmSPL2b, GmHSFA6b were predicted using PlantCARE on the web (http://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/plantcare/html/).

Vector construction and genetic transformation

The miR156bOE vector was got from our previous study (Ding et al., 2020b). The full‐length coding domain sequence (CDS) regions of GmSPL2b and GmHSFA6b were cloned from cDNA of soybean cultivar N4608 and cloned into the pMD‐19T vector, then inserted into pCAMBIA3301‐26 vector (with BamHI linearized) using a one‐step cloning kit (Vazyme, Nanjing, China) to generate the p35S::GmSPL2b and p35S::GmHSFA6b expression vector, respectively. Three vectors (pU6‐sgR, pU3‐sgR and pGmUbi‐Cas9) from Professor Yu's laboratory (National Center for Soybean Improvement, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China) was used to knock out GmSPL2b according to an established protocol (Du et al., 2016; Zhang et al., 2020). The target sequences of the sgRNAs were designed by the web‐based tool CRISPR‐P 2.0 (http://cbi.hzau.edu.cn/cgi‐bin/CRISPR2/CRISPR). Mutation detection and primer design were performed using CRISPR‐GE software (Zeng et al., 2018). To generate β‐glucosidase (GUS) reporter construct of GmSPL2b, the promoter of GmSPL2b (2000 bp) was amplified by PCR using DNA from soybean cultivar N4608 and cloned into the pMD‐19T vector, and then replaced the 35S promoter of pCAMBIA3301‐GUS using HindIII and NcoI digestion, resulting in a plasmid of pGmSPL2b::GUS.

The miR156bOE and GmSPL2b knockout vectors were transformed into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain EHA105 via the freeze–thaw method, then transformed into soybean cultivar W82 according to an established protocol (Li et al., 2017). The GmHSFA6OE and pGmSPL2b::GUS vectors were transformed into Arabidopsis according to the Agrobacterium‐mediated floral dip method (Clough and Bent, 1998). All primers used for PCR are listed in Table S9.

Subcellular localization and transcriptional activation analysis

The full‐length CDS of GmSPL2b minus the stop codon was cloned from its pMD‐19 T vector and then inserted into pCAMBIA3301–GFP vector (with BglII linearized) using a one‐step cloning kit (Vazyme, Nanjing, China) to generate the p35S::GmSPL2b–GFP expression vector. The pCAMBIA3301–GFP vector was used as the control. The fusion constructs or control plasmids were transformed into tobacco (Nicotiana benthamiana) leaves as described previously (Ding et al., 2020a). GFP fluorescence was visualized under a confocal laser scanning microsystem LSM780 (Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany) with 488‐nm excitation wave length.

Transcriptional activation analysis of GmSPL2b was performed according to previously reported method (Ma et al., 2021). First, the full‐length CDS of GmSPL2b was cloned from cDNA of soybean cultivar N4608 and then inserted into pGBKT7 vector (with EcoRI and BamHI linearized) using a one‐step cloning kit (Vazyme, Nanjing, China), yielding a BD‐GmSPL2b. Second, the recombinant plasmid was transferred to the Y2H strain and cultured on SD/−Trp medium, and then selected on SD/−Trp/−His/−Ade medium for transcriptional activation analysis. The pGBKT7 vector was used as the control and all primers used for PCR are listed in Table S9.

Male fertility investigation

To observe the pollen fertility of soybean and Arabidopsis, the anthers of unopened flowers (the flowers that will open the next morning) in the afternoon were taken and stained with a 1% I2‐KI solution (Nie et al., 2019) and Alexander's staining solution (Ding et al., 2020a), respectively, and then observed under an Olympus CX31 microscope (Tokyo, Japan). For anther morphology observation, anthers from opened flowers of soybean and Arabidopsis were randomly selected in the morning between 8:00 and 10:00 and observed under an Olympus CX31 microscope (Tokyo, Japan). To histologically analyse the anther response of miR156bOE and W82 to HT, the unopened flowers (the flowers that will open the next morning) in the afternoon were fixed, dehydrated, embedded, sectioned, stained according to a previous report (Yang et al., 1998), then observed under an Olympus CX31 microscope (Tokyo, Japan) and photographed with a digital colour camera system (Olympus DP27, Tokyo, Japan).

Pollen germination and HT treatment

For soybean pollen germination investigation, flowers were randomly selected from three plants in each genotype in the morning between 8:00 and 10:00. Flowers were air‐dried for 1 h at room temperature, and the fresh pollen was then dusted on the modified pollen germination medium (PGM) in vitro (Djanaguiraman et al., 2019). The PGM was prepared with 15 g sucrose, 0.03 g calcium nitrate, 0.04 g boric acid and 0.6 g agar in 100 mL of deionized water and boiled for 10 min, and then poured into culture dishes (Koti et al., 2004; Salem et al., 2007). The pollen was dusted on the PGM and the plates were then covered and incubated in an illuminated incubator (RXZ‐430D, Ningbojiangnan, Ningbo, China) at 30 °C for 0.5 h. Pollen grain was considered germinated when its tube length was greater than the diameter of the pollen grain (Prasad et al., 2006) and observed using an OLYMPUS CX31 microscope (Tokyo, Japan). For HT stress treatment, pollen in PGM was incubated at 40 °C for 0.5 h (Djanaguiraman et al., 2019).

RNA‐seq and data analysis

Total RNAs from the flower buds of miR156bOE‐1NT, W82NT, miR156bOE‐1HT and W82HT (three independent biological replicates for each genotype) were isolated using the TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, United States) according to the manufacturer's introduction. Library construction and RNA sequencing were performed by MetWare (Wuhan, China). Clean data were remapped to the soybean Williams 82 reference genome (Wm82.a4.v1) by HISAT (v2.1.0, Kim et al., 2015). DESeq2 (v1.22.1, Love et al., 2014) was used to analyse the differential expression between the two groups, only genes with ¦Log2FC¦ ≥ 1 and corrected P value ≤0.05 were identified as significant DEGs. DEG enrichment analysis mainly includes GO enrichment analysis and KEGG pathway enrichment.

RNA isolation and qRT‐PCR analysis

Total RNAs from miR156bOENT, W82NT, miR156bOEHT, W82HT and gmspl2b mutants in soybean and GmHSFA6bOE lines and WT in Arabidopsis were isolated using the TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, United States) according to the manufacturer's introduction. Total RNA from the same soybean samples that constructed the cDNA library was used for the validation of RNA‐seq. The first‐strand complementary cDNA of miRNA and mRNA was generated using the miRNA 1st‐Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Vazyme, Nanjing, China) and HiScript Q RT SuperMix for qPCR Kit (+gDNA wiper, Vazyme, Nanjing, China), respectively. The qRT‐PCR analysis of miRNA and mRNA and internal control genes setting for soybean and Arabidopsis were carried out according to the method described in our previous studies (Ding et al., 2021a, 2021b). All reactions were run with three independent biological replicates, and the relative gene expression levels were calculated using the 2−ΔΔCt method (Livak and Schmittgen, 2001). Primers used for qRT‐PCR analysis are listed in Table S9.

Metabolomic analysis

The sample used in the metabolomic analysis was the same as the sample used for RNA‐seq. Metabolite extraction was conducted according to the manufacturer's instruction (Wuhan MetWare Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Wuhan, China), and metabolomic analysis was carried out using UPLC‐MS/MS (UPLC: Shim‐pack UFLC SHIMADZU CBM30A, Kyoto, Japan; MS/MS: Applied Biosystems 4500 Q TRAP, Foster City, CA, USA) according to the method described in our previous study (Ding et al., 2019a). Three independent biological replications were performed. The identified metabolites were annotated using the metware database (http://www.metware.cn). Differential metabolites between groups were determined by ¦Log2FC¦ ≥ 1 and VIP ≥1.

Y1H assay

The full‐length CDS of GmSPL2b was cloned from its pMD‐19T vector and inserted into the pGADT7 plasmid to generate the effector vector pGADT7–GmSPL2b. The F1–F4 fragment containing GTAC motif from the GmHSFA6b promoter region was integrated into the pAbAi plasmid to generate a reporter vector pAbAi–pGmHSFA6bF1 to F4, respectively. The assay was conducted according to the previously reported methods (Ding et al., 2020a; Li et al., 2021). The pAbAi–pGmHSFA6bF1 to F4 was first introduced into the Y1H gold yeast (Clontech, Dalian, China) and cultured on SD/−Ura/Aureobasidin A (AbA) medium for self‐activating detection. After that, the pGADT7–GmSPL2b and negative control vectors were introduced into the bait‐reporter strain and cultured on SD/−Ura/−Leu/AbA for Y1H assay to examine the interaction of GmSPL2b and the GmHSFA6b promoter fragment. Primers used in Y1H assay are listed in Table S9.

LUC assay

The LUC assay was performed basically following the protocols described by Dai et al. (2018) and Wang et al. (2020). The plasmid p35S::GmSPL2b was transformed into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3101 act as an effector. The promoter sequence of GmHSFA6b was recombined into the pGreenII 0800‐LUC plasmid and subsequently co‐transformed with the helper plasmid pSoup19 into GV3101 act as the reporter. The pCAMBIA3301‐26 plasmid was used as negative control. The reporter strain was mixed with the effectors strain harbouring p35S::GmSPL2b or pCAMBIA3301‐26 at a ratio of 1:1 and cotransformed into tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) leaves (Dai et al., 2018). The dual‐luciferase reporter assay system (Promega, E1910, Wisconsin, USA) was used for luminescence detection. Primers used in LUC assay are listed in Table S9.

GUS and NBT staining

GUS staining of inflorescence from the pGmSPL2b::GUS transgenic Arabidopsis material was performed as Jefferson et al. (1987) described. ROS content was observed in the inflorescence of Arabidopsis using NBT staining under NT and HT conditions according to the previously reported method (Kumar et al., 2014). All staining samples were observed under an OLYMPUS SZ61 stereomicroscope (Tokyo, Japan) and photographed with a digital colour camera system (Olympus DP27, Tokyo, Japan).

Fluorescence detection of ROS in soybean and Arabidopsis

The fluorescence detection of ROS in anther of soybean and inflorescence of Arabidopsis was performed using CM‐H2DCFDA staining followed the protocols described by Muhlemann et al. (2018) and Zhang et al. (2021). Detached soybean flower buds (the flowers that will open the next morning after removed sepals and petals) and Arabidopsis inflorescence were subjected to HT stress for 1 day and 4.5 h, respectively, and then the samples were harvested and placed in a 2.0 mL centrifuge tube containing CM‐H2DCFDA staining solution (10 mmol/L Tris–HCl, 50 mmol/L KCl, pH7.0; 5 μM CM‐H2DCFDA and 0.005% (v/v) Triton X‐100). Soybean flower buds or Arabidopsis inflorescence under NT condition were used as control. The samples were incubated in the dark (28 °C) for 20 min and then washed twice with fresh solution (10 mmol/L Tris–HCl, 50 mmol/L KCl, pH7.0). The stained soybean anthers (removed from the flower bud using tweezer) and Arabidopsis inflorescence were placed on a microscope slide. Fluorescence was visualized under a stereo fluorescence microscope (LEICA M165 FC, Germany). The quantification of ROS fluorescence intensity in soybean anther was performed using Fiji (Schindelin et al., 2012).

Statistical analysis

Data were shown with the mean ± SD from three independent experiments, and SAS was used for data analysis. One‐way ANOVA and Duncan's test and Student's t‐test were used to identify significant differences.

Accession numbers

The RNA‐seq data generated as part of this study can be found in the NCBI database using accession number PRJNA935333.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the National Key R&D Program of China (2022YFF1003500, 2022YFF1003504, 2016YFD0101500 and 2016YFD0101504) and the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2020M681635).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Author contribution statement

X.L.D. and S.P.Y. conceived and designed the experiments. X.L.D., J.F.G., M.L.L., H.J.W., Y.S. and Y.L. performed the experiments. X.L.D. wrote the manuscript, and X.L.D., S.P.Y and J.Y.G revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Supporting information

Figure S1 Statistics of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between W82 and miR156bOE‐1.

Figure S2 Gene ontology (GO) enrichment of DEGs in the flower buds of W82 and miR156bOE‐1 under HT stress.

Figure S3 Heat map of the DEGs in four different tissues of soybean obtained from RNA‐seq in Phytozome 13.0.

Figure S4 Heat map of the differentially metabolites in the flower buds of W82 and miR156bOE‐1 under HT stress.

Figure S5 Top 20 of pathway enrichment based on metabolome study.

Figure S6 Analysis of GmSPL4a and GmSPL4b.

Figure S7 Verification of F4 GTAC motif self‐activation in the promoter region of GmHSFA6b.

Figure S8 Comparison of nucleotide sequences of miR156b precursor promoter and precursor in soybean restorer lines N4608 and YY6.

Figure S9 Comparison of nucleotide sequences of GmSPL2b gene promoter and CDS in soybean restorer lines N4608 and YY6.

Figure S10 Comparison of nucleotide sequences of GmHSFA6b gene promoter and CDS in soybean restorer lines N4608 and YY6.

Figure S11 A possible regulatory model of miR156b/GmSPL2b module mediated male fertility in soybean CMS‐based restorer line under HT stress.

PBI-21-1542-s001.pdf (6.8MB, pdf)

Table S1 Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) detected in miR156bOE‐1NT and miR156bOE‐1HT.

Table S2 DEGs detected between W82NT and W82HT.

Table S3 DEGs detected between W82NT and miR156bOE‐1NT.

Table S4 DEGs detected between W82HT and miR156bOE‐1HT.

Table S5 Differential metabolites detected between miR156bOE‐1NT and miR156bOE‐1HT.

Table S6 Differential metabolites detected between W82NT and W82HT.

Table S7 Differential metabolites detected between W82NT and miR156bOE‐1NT.

Table S8 Differential metabolites detected between W82HT and miR156bOE‐1HT.

Table S9 Primers used in this study.

PBI-21-1542-s002.xls (4MB, xls)

Acknowledgement

We thank Prof. Deyue Yu (Nanjing Agricultural University) for providing the pU6‐sgR, pU3‐sgR and pGmUbi‐Cas9 vectors.

References

  1. Begcy, K. , Nosenko, T. , Zhou, L.Z. , Fragner, L. , Weckwerth, W. and Dresselhaus, T. (2019) Male sterility in maize after transient heat stress during the tetrad stage of pollen development. Plant Physiol. 181, 683–700. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cao, D. , Li, Y. , Wang, J.L. , Nan, H.Y. , Wang, Y.N. , Lu, S.J. , Jiang, Q. et al. (2015) GmmiR156b overexpression delays flowering time in soybean. Plant Mol. Biol. 89, 353–363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chen, L.T. and Liu, Y.G. (2014) Male sterility and fertility restoration in crops. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 65, 579–606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chen, J. , Pan, A. , He, S.J. , Su, P. , Yuan, X.L. , Zhu, S.W. and Liu, Z. (2020) Different microRNA families involved in regulating high temperature stress response during cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) anther development. Int. J. Mol. Sci 21, 1280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Clough, S.J. and Bent, A.F. (1998) Floral dip: a simplified method for Agrobacterium‐mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana . Plant J. 16, 735–743. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cui, L. , Zheng, F.Y. , Wang, J.F. , Zhang, C.L. , Xiao, F.M. , Ye, J. , Li, C.X. et al. (2020) miR156a‐targeted SBP‐Box transcription factor SlSPL13 regulates inflorescence morphogenesis by directly activating SFT in tomato. Plant Biotechnol. J. 18, 1670–1682. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dai, Z.Y. , Wang, J. , Yang, X.F. , Lu, H. , Miao, X.X. and Shi, Z.Y. (2018) Modulation of plant architecture by the miR156f‐OsSPL7‐OsGH3.8 pathway in rice. J. Exp. Bot. 69, 5117–5130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ding, D.R. , Gai, J.Y. , Cui, Z.L. , Yang, S.P. and Qiu, J.X. (1999) Development and verification of the cytoplasmic‐nuclear male sterile soybean line NJCMS1A and its maintainer NJCMS1B. Chin. Sci. Bull. 44, 191–192. [Google Scholar]
  9. Ding, D.R. , Gai, J.Y. , Cui, Z.L. and Qiu, J.X. (2002) Development of a cytoplasmic‐nuclear male‐sterile line of soybean. Euphytica 124, 85–91. [Google Scholar]
  10. Ding, X.L. , Wang, X. , Li, Q. , Yu, L.F. , Song, Q.J. , Gai, J.Y. and Yang, S.P. (2019a) Metabolomics studies on cytoplasmic male sterility during flower bud development in soybean. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 20, 2869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ding, X.L. , Zhang, H. , Ruan, H. , Li, Y.W. , Chen, L.F. , Wang, T.L. , Jin, L. et al. (2019b) Exploration of miRNA‐mediated fertility regulation network of cytoplasmic male sterility during flower bud development in soybean. 3 Biotech 9, 22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ding, X.L. , Guo, Q.L. , Li, Q. , Gai, J.Y. and Yang, S.P. (2020a) Comparative transcriptomics analysis and functional study reveal important role of high‐temperature stress response gene GmHSFA2 during flower bud development of CMS‐based F1 in soybean. Front. Plant Sci. 11, 600217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ding, X.L. , Ruan, H. , Yu, L.F. , Li, Q. , Song, Q.J. , Yang, S.P. and Gai, J.Y. (2020b) miR156b from soybean CMS line modulates floral organ development. J. Plant Biol. 63, 141–153. [Google Scholar]
  14. Ding, X.L. , Chen, L.F. , Guo, J.F. , Gai, J.Y. and Yang, S.P. (2021a) A small RNA of miR2119b from soybean CMS line acts as a negative regulator of male fertility in transgenic Arabidopsis . Plant Physiol. Biochem. 167, 210–221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ding, X.L. , Guo, J.F. , Zhang, Q.Q. , Yu, L.F. , Zhao, T.J. and Yang, S.P. (2021b) Heat‐responsive miRNAs participate in the regulation of male fertility stability in soybean CMS‐based F1 under high temperature stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22, 2446. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Djanaguiraman, M. , Perumal, R. , Jagadish, S.V.K. , Ciampitti, I.A. , Welti, R. and Prasad, P.V.V. (2018) Sensitivity of sorghum pollen and pistil to high‐temperature stress. Plant Cell Environ. 41, 1065–1082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Djanaguiraman, M. , Schapaugh, W. , Fritschi, F. , Nguyen, H. and Prasad, P.V.V. (2019) Reproductive success of soybean (Glycine max L. Merril) cultivars and exotic lines under high daytime temperature. Plant Cell Environ. 42, 321–336. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Du, H.Y. , Zeng, X.R. , Zhao, M. , Cui, X.P. , Wang, Q. , Yang, H. , Cheng, H. et al. (2016) Efficient targeted mutagenesis in soybean by TALENs and CRISPR/Cas9. J. Biotechnol. 217, 90–97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Feng, X.H. , Zhang, H.X. , Ali, M. , Gai, W.X. , Cheng, G.X. , Yu, Q.H. , Yang, S.B. et al. (2019) A small heat shock protein CaHsp25.9 positively regulates heat, salt, and drought stress tolerance in pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). Plant Physiol. Biochem. 142, 151–162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Fragkostefanakis, S. , Mesihovic, A. , Simm, S. , Paupière, M.J. , Hu, Y. , Paul, P. , Mishra, S.K. et al. (2016) HsfA2 controls the activity of developmentally and stress‐regulated heat stress protection mechanisms in tomato male reproductive tissues. Plant Physiol. 170, 2461–2477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Gai, J.Y. , Cui, Z.L. , Ji, D.F. , Ren, Z.J. and Ding, D.R. (1995) A report on the nuclear cytoplasmic male sterility from a cross between two soybean cultivars. Soybean Genet. Newsl. 22, 55–58. [Google Scholar]
  22. Giorno, F. , Wolters‐Arts, M. , Grillo, S. , Scharf, K.D. , Vriezen, W.H. and Mariani, C. (2010) Developmental and heat stress‐regulated expression of HsfA2 and small heat shock proteins in tomato anthers. J. Exp. Bot. 61, 453–462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. He, J. , Jiang, Z.M. , Gao, L. , You, C.J. , Ma, X. , Wang, X.F. , Xu, X.F. et al. (2019) Genome‐wide transcript and small RNA profiling reveals transcriptomic responses to heat stress. Plant Physiol. 181, 609–629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Jefferson, R. , Kavanagh, T. and Bevan, M. (1987) GUS fusions: beta‐glucuronidase as a sensitive and versatile gene fusion marker in higher plants. EMBO J. 6, 3901–3907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Jiang, J.J. , Yao, L.N. , Yu, Y.J. , Liang, Y. , Jiang, J.X. , Ye, N.H. , Miao, Y. et al. (2014) PECTATE LYASE‐LIKE 9 from Brassica campestris is associated with intine formation. Plant Sci. 229, 66–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Kim, S.Y. , Hong, C.B. and Lee, I. (2001) Heat shock stress causes stage‐specific male sterility in Arabidopsis thaliana . J. Plant Res. 114, 301–307. [Google Scholar]
  27. Kim, D. , Langmead, B. and Salzberg, S.L. (2015) HISAT: a fast spliced aligner with low memory requirements. Nat. Methods 12, 357–360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Koti, S. , Reddy, K.R. , Kakani, V.G. , Zhao, D. and Reddy, V.R. (2004) Soybean (Glycine max) pollen germination characteristics, flower and pollen morphology in response to enhanced ultraviolet‐B radiation. Ann. Bot. 94, 855–864. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Kumar, D. , Yusuf, M.A. , Singh, P. , Sardar, M. and Sarin, N.B. (2014) Histochemical detection of superoxide and H2O2 accumulation in Brassica juncea seedlings. Bio‐protocol 4, e1108. [Google Scholar]
  30. Lei, K.J. and Liu, H. (2016) Research advances in plant regulatory hub miR156 and targeted SPL family. Chem. Life 36, 13–20. [Google Scholar]
  31. Li, J. , Wu, L.Q. , Zheng, W.Y. , Wang, R.F. and Yang, L.X. (2015) Genome‐wide identification of microRNAs responsive to high temperature in rice (Oryza sativa) by high‐throughput deep sequencing. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 201, 379–388. [Google Scholar]
  32. Li, S.X. , Cong, Y.H. , Liu, Y.P. , Wang, T.T. , Shuai, Q. , Chen, N.N. , Gai, J.Y. et al. (2017) Optimization of Agrobacterium‐mediated transformation in soybean. Front. Plant Sci. 8, 246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Li, C. , Li, K.N. , Liu, X.Y. , Ruan, H. , Zheng, M.M. , Yu, Z.J. , Gai, J.Y. et al. (2021) Transcription factor GmWRKY46 enhanced phosphate starvation tolerance and root development in transgenic plants. Front. Plant Sci. 12, 700651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Liu, Q. , Yan, S.J. , Yang, T.F. , Zhang, S.H. , Chen, Y.Q. and Liu, B. (2017a) Small RNAs in regulating temperature stress response in plants. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 59, 774–791. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Liu, Q. , Yang, T.F. , Yu, T. , Zhang, S.H. , Mao, X.X. , Zhao, J.L. , Wang, X.F. et al. (2017b) Integrating small RNA sequencing with QTL mapping for identification of miRNAs and their target genes associated with heat tolerance at the flowering stage in rice. Front. Plant Sci. 8, 43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Liu, Z.H. , Shi, X.Y. , Li, S. , Zhang, L.L. and Song, X.Y. (2018) Oxidative stress and aberrant programmed cell death are associated with pollen abortion in isonuclear alloplasmic male‐sterile wheat. Front. Plant Sci. 9, 595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Livak, K.J. and Schmittgen, T.D. (2001) Analysis of relative gene expression data using realtime quantitative PCR and the 2(‐Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods 25, 402–408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Love, M.I. , Huber, W. and Anders, S. (2014) Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA‐seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 15, 550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Ma, Y. , Xue, H. , Zhang, F. , Jiang, Q. , Yang, S. , Yue, P.T. , Wang, F. et al. (2021) The miR156/SPL module regulates apple salt stress tolerance by activating MdWRKY100 expression. Plant Biotechnol. J. 19, 311–323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Matthews, C. , Arshad, M. and Hannoufa, A. (2019) Alfalfa response to heat stress is modulated by microRNA156. Physiol. Plant. 165, 830–842. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Muhlemann, J.K. , Younts, T.L.B. and Muday, G.K. (2018) Flavonols control pollen tube growth and integrity by regulating ROS homeostasis during high‐temperature stress. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 115, E11188–E11197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Myers, C. , Romanowsky, S.M. , Barron, Y.D. , Garg, S. , Azuse, C.L. , Curran, A. , Davis, R.M. et al. (2009) Calcium‐dependent protein kinases regulate polarized tip growth in pollen tubes. Plant J. 59, 528–539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Nie, Z.X. , Zhao, T.J. , Liu, M.F. , Dai, J.Y. , He, T.T. , Lyu, D. , Zhao, J.M. et al. (2019) Molecular mapping of a novel male‐sterile gene msNJ in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.]. Plant Reprod. 32, 371–380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Ning, K. , Chen, S. , Huang, H.J. , Jiang, J. , Yuan, H.M. and Li, H.Y. (2017) Molecular characterization and expression analysis of the SPL gene family with BpSPL9 transgenic lines found to confer tolerance to abiotic stress in Betula platyphylla Suk. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. 130, 469–481. [Google Scholar]
  45. Pan, C.T. , Ye, L. , Zheng, Y. , Wang, Y. , Yang, D.D. , Liu, X. , Chen, L.F. et al. (2017) Identification and expression profiling of microRNAs involved in the stigma exsertion under high‐temperature stress in tomato. BMC Genomics 18, 843. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Paupière, M.J. , Müller, F. , Li, H. , Rieu, I. , Tikunov, Y.M. , Visser, R.G.F. and Bovy, A.G. (2017) Untargeted metabolomic analysis of tomato pollen development and heat stress response. Plant Reprod. 30, 81–94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Prasad, P.V.V. , Boote, K.J. and Jr, L.H.A. (2006) Adverse high temperature effects on pollen viability, seed‐set, seed yield, and harvest index of grain‐sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] are more severe at elevated carbon dioxide due to higher tissue temperatures. Agric. For. Meteorol. 139, 237–251. [Google Scholar]
  48. Rutley, N. , Miller, G. , Wang, F. , Harper, J.F. , Miller, G. and Lieberman‐Lazarovich, M. (2021) Enhanced reproductive thermotolerance of the tomato high pigment 2 mutant is associated with increased accumulation of flavonols in pollen. Front. Plant Sci. 12, 672368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Salem, M.A. , Kakani, V.G. , Koti, S. and Reddy, K.R. (2007) Pollen‐based screening of soybean genotypes for high temperature. Crop. Sci. 47, 219–231. [Google Scholar]
  50. Schindelin, J. , Arganda‐Carreras, I. , Frise, E. , Kaynig, V. , Longair, M. , Pietzsch, T. , Preibisch, S. et al. (2012) Fiji: an open‐source platform for biological‐image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 676–682. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Shan, X.T. , Li, Y.Q. , Yang, S. , Yang, Z.Z. , Qiu, M. , Gao, R.F. , Han, T.T. et al. (2020) The spatio‐temporal biosynthesis of floral flavonols is controlled by differential phylogenetic MYB regulators in Freesia hybrida . New Phytol. 228, 1864–1879. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Singh, R.K. , Jaishankar, J. , Muthamilarasan, M. , Shweta, S. , Dangi, A. and Prasad, M. (2016) Genome‐wide analysis of heat shock proteins in C4 model, foxtail millet identifies potential candidates for crop improvement under abiotic stress. Sci. Rep. 6, 641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Stief, A. , Altmann, S. , Hoffmann, K. , Pant, B.D. , Scheible, W.R. and Bäurle, I. (2014) Arabidopsis miR156 regulates tolerance to recurring environmental stress through SPL transcription factors. Plant Cell 26, 1792–1807. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Sun, L.L. , Sui, X.L. , Lucas, W.J. , Li, Y.X. , Feng, S. , Ma, S. , Fan, J.W. et al. (2019a) Downregulation of the sucrose transporter CsSUT1 causes male sterility by altering carbohydrate supply. Plant Physiol. 180, 986–997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Sun, Z.X. , Su, C. , Yun, J.X. , Jiang, Q. , Wang, L.X. , Wang, Y.N. , Cao, D. et al. (2019b) Genetic improvement of the shoot architecture and yield in soya bean plants via the manipulation of GmmiR156b . Plant Biotechnol. J. 17, 50–62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Sun, Y.Y. , Zhao, L.M. , Zhang, W. and Zhang, C.B. (2021a) Research progress on utilization of soybean heterosis. Soybean Sci. Technol. 6, 26–35. [Google Scholar]
  57. Sun, X.B. , Huang, N. , Li, X. , Zhu, J.F. , Bian, X.J. , Li, H.B. , Wang, L.H. et al. (2021b) A chloroplast heat shock protein modulates growth and abiotic stress response in creeping bentgrass. Plant Cell Environ. 44, 1769–1787. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Tamura, K. , Peterson, D. , Peterson, N. , Stecher, G. , Nei, M. and Kumar, S. (2011) MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol. Biol. Evol. 28, 2731–2739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Wang, X.D. (2019) Overview of the study and application of cytoplasmic male sterility in cotton. Sci. Agric. Sin. 52, 1341–1354. [Google Scholar]
  60. Wang, X.D. and Li, Y.Y. (2002) Development of transgenic restorer of cytoplasmic male sterility in upland cotton. Agric. Sci. China 1, 375–380. [Google Scholar]
  61. Wang, Z. , Wang, Y. , Kohalmi, S.E. , Amyot, L. and Hannoufa, A. (2016) SQUAMOSA PROMOTER BINDING PROTEIN‐LIKE 2 controls floral organ development and plant fertility by activating ASYMMETRIC LEAVES 2 in Arabidopsis thaliana . Plant Mol. Biol. 92, 661–674. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Wang, N. , Liu, W.J. , Yu, L. , Guo, Z.W. , Chen, Z.J. , Jiang, S.H. , Xu, H.F. et al. (2020) HEAT SHOCK FACTOR A8a modulates flavonoid synthesis and drought tolerance. Plant Physiol. 184, 1273–1290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Wei, S.Y. , Hu, W. , Deng, X.M. , Zhang, Y.Y. , Liu, X.D. , Zhao, X.D. , Luo, Q.C. et al. (2014) A rice calcium‐dependent protein kinase OsCPK9 positively regulates drought stress tolerance and spikelet fertility. BMC Plant Biol. 14, 133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Xie, P.D. (2008) Review of soybean male sterility and heterosis utilization. J. Shenyang Agric. Univ. 39, 131–136. [Google Scholar]
  65. Xin, M.M. , Wang, Y. , Yao, Y.Y. , Xie, C.J. , Peng, H.R. , Ni, Z.F. and Sun, Q.X. (2010) Diverse set of microRNAs are responsive to powdery mildew infection and heat stress in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). BMC Plant Biol. 10, 123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Yang, S.P. , Gai, J.Y. and Xu, H.Q. (1998) A genetical and cytomorphological study on the male sterile mutant NJ89‐1 in soybeans. Soybean Sci. 17, 32–37. [Google Scholar]
  67. Yang, M.L. , Zhang, Y.X. , Zhang, H.H. , Wang, H.B. , Wei, T. , Che, S.Y. , Zhang, L.P. et al. (2017) Identification of MsHsp20 gene family in Malus sieversii and functional characterization of MsHsp16.9 in heat tolerance. Front. Plant Sci. 8, 1761. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Yu, X. , Wang, H. , Lu, Y.Z. , de Ruiter, M. , Cariaso, M. , Prins, M. , van Tunen, A. et al. (2012) Identification of conserved and novel microRNAs that are responsive to heat stress in Brassica rapa . J. Exp. Bot. 63, 1025–1038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Yun, J.X. , Sun, Z.X. , Jiang, Q. , Wang, Y.N. , Wang, C. , Luo, Y.Q. , Zhang, F.R. et al. (2022) The miR156b‐GmSPL9d module modulates nodulation by targeting multiple core nodulation genes in soybean. New Phytol. 233, 1881–1899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Zeng, D.C. , Ma, X.L. , Xie, X.R. , Zhu, Q.L. and Liu, Y.G. (2018) A protocol for CRISPR/Cas9‐based multi‐gene editing and sequence decoding of mutant sites in plants. Sci. Sin. Vitae 48, 783–794. [Google Scholar]
  71. Zhai, M.Z. , Sun, Y.D. , Jia, C.X. , Peng, S.B. , Liu, Z.X. and Yang, G.Y. (2016) Over‐expression of JrsHSP17.3 gene from Juglans regia confer the tolerance to abnormal temperature and NaCl stresses. J. Plant Biol. 59, 549–558. [Google Scholar]
  72. Zhang, P.P. , Du, H.Y. , Wang, J. , Pu, Y.X. , Yang, C.Y. , Yan, R.J. , Yang, H. et al. (2020) Multiplex CRISPR/Cas9‐mediated metabolic engineering increases soya bean isoflavone content and resistance to soya bean mosaic virus. Plant Biotechnol. J. 18, 1384–1395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Zhang, X.Y. , He, Y.Q. , Li, L.Y. , Liu, H.R. and Hong, G.J. (2021) Involvement of the R2R3‐MYB transcription factor MYB21 and its homologs in regulating flavonol accumulation in Arabidopsis stamen. J. Exp. Bot. 72, 4319–4332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Zhao, Z.W. , Zeng, Z.H. , Chen, X. , Jiang, X.Y. , Lei, K.R. and Yao, N. (2009) Influences of natural high‐temperature stress on pollen fertility and main agronomic traits of hybrid rice. Acta Agric. Jiangxi 21, 19–21. [Google Scholar]
  75. Zhao, Q. , Zhou, L.J. , Liu, J.C. , Du, X.X. , Asad, M.A.U. , Huang, F.D. , Pan, G. et al. (2018) Relationship of ROS accumulation and superoxide dismutase isozymes in developing anther with floret fertility of rice under heat stress. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 122, 90–101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Zhou, R. , Wang, Q. , Jiang, F.L. , Cao, X. , Sun, M.T. , Liu, M. and Wu, Z. (2016) Identification of miRNAs and their targets in wild tomato at moderately and acutely elevated temperatures by high‐throughput sequencing and degradome analysis. Sci. Rep. 6, 33777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Figure S1 Statistics of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between W82 and miR156bOE‐1.

Figure S2 Gene ontology (GO) enrichment of DEGs in the flower buds of W82 and miR156bOE‐1 under HT stress.

Figure S3 Heat map of the DEGs in four different tissues of soybean obtained from RNA‐seq in Phytozome 13.0.

Figure S4 Heat map of the differentially metabolites in the flower buds of W82 and miR156bOE‐1 under HT stress.

Figure S5 Top 20 of pathway enrichment based on metabolome study.

Figure S6 Analysis of GmSPL4a and GmSPL4b.

Figure S7 Verification of F4 GTAC motif self‐activation in the promoter region of GmHSFA6b.

Figure S8 Comparison of nucleotide sequences of miR156b precursor promoter and precursor in soybean restorer lines N4608 and YY6.

Figure S9 Comparison of nucleotide sequences of GmSPL2b gene promoter and CDS in soybean restorer lines N4608 and YY6.

Figure S10 Comparison of nucleotide sequences of GmHSFA6b gene promoter and CDS in soybean restorer lines N4608 and YY6.

Figure S11 A possible regulatory model of miR156b/GmSPL2b module mediated male fertility in soybean CMS‐based restorer line under HT stress.

PBI-21-1542-s001.pdf (6.8MB, pdf)

Table S1 Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) detected in miR156bOE‐1NT and miR156bOE‐1HT.

Table S2 DEGs detected between W82NT and W82HT.

Table S3 DEGs detected between W82NT and miR156bOE‐1NT.

Table S4 DEGs detected between W82HT and miR156bOE‐1HT.

Table S5 Differential metabolites detected between miR156bOE‐1NT and miR156bOE‐1HT.

Table S6 Differential metabolites detected between W82NT and W82HT.

Table S7 Differential metabolites detected between W82NT and miR156bOE‐1NT.

Table S8 Differential metabolites detected between W82HT and miR156bOE‐1HT.

Table S9 Primers used in this study.

PBI-21-1542-s002.xls (4MB, xls)

Articles from Plant Biotechnology Journal are provided here courtesy of Society for Experimental Biology (SEB) and the Association of Applied Biologists (AAB) and John Wiley and Sons, Ltd

RESOURCES