Abstract
Bibliometrics are a range of techniques and quantitative measures that provide an analysis of written publications such as books and articles, and which assess the impact of research outputs. They are commonly applied to individual authors in the form of citation metrics but can also be used to assess the influence of research groups or even entire institutions. With the increased importance of social media as a means of communicating and publicising research findings, additional alternative measures of impact (altmetrics) are now being used. In addition to analysing the reach of a research output, bibliometrics can also be used as search tools to identify related and updated research, author networks and connections between institutions. This review summarises the range of tools and services that are available, their advantages and disadvantages, and some of the challenges and issues presented by the existence of multiple digital versions of research outputs.
Keywords: bibliometrics, altmetrics, citation indexes, h-index, impact factors, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (3.8 MB).
8. References
- 1.Otlet P. (1934) Traité de documentatio: le livre sur le livre, théorie et pratique. Mundaneum Editions, Brussels. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Otlet P. (1934) Traité de documentation: le livre sur le livre, théorie et pratique. https://archive.org/details/OtletTraitDocumentationUgent [accessed 30 July 2018].
- 3.Rousseau R. (2014) Nature, 512, 218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Pritchard A. (1969) J. Doc., 25, 348–349. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Shapiro F.R. (1992) J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 43, 337–339. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Garfield E. (1955) Science, 122, 108–111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Garfield E. (2006) Int. J. Epidemiol., 35, 1123–1127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.De Solla Price D.J. (1965) Science, 149, 510–515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Google (n.d.) How we started and where we are today. Google. https://www.google.com/about/our-story/ [accessed 31 July 2018].
- 10.Brin S., and Page L. (1998) Comput. Networks ISDN, 30, 107–117. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Strickland J. (n.d.) Why is the Google algorithm so important? https://computer.howstuffworks.com/google-algorithm1.htm [accessed 11 July 2018].
- 12.Priem J., Taraborelli D., Groth P., and Neylon C. (2010) Altmetrics: a manifesto. http://altmetrics.org/manifesto/ [accessed 10 July 2018].
- 13.Elsevier; (n.d.) About Scopus. https://www.elsevier.com/en-gb/solutions/scopus [accessed 18 July 2018]. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Giles J. (2005) Nature, 438, 554–555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Khabasa M., and Giles C.L. (2014) PLOS One, 9, e93949. http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0093949 [accessed 12 July 2018]. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Martín-Martín A., Orduna-Malea E., and Delgado López-Cózar E. (2018) Scientometrics, 10.1007/s11192-018-2820-9. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11192-018-2820-9 [accessed 9 July 2018]. [DOI]
- 17.Google Scholar (n.d.) Classic papers 2006. https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=list_classic_articles&hl=en&by=2006 [accessed 30 July 2018].
- 18.University of Cambridge (n.d.) Predatory publishers. https://osc.cam.ac.uk/about-scholarly-communication/author-tools/considerations-when-choosing-journal/predatory-publishers [accessed 31 July 2018].
- 19.Lagzian M., and Borchardt G. (2017) J. Cell Commun. Signal., 11, 181–185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Somoza-Fernánde M., Rodríguez-Gairín J.M., and Urbano C. (2016) EPI, 25, 730–737. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Boucherie S., and McCullough R. (2018) CiteScore metrics updated with 2017 annual values. Elsevier. https://www.elsevier.com/connect/citescore-metrics-updated-with-2017-annual-values [accessed 11 July 2018]. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Butler D. (2008) Nature, 451, 6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Falagas M.E., Kouranos V.D., Arencibia-Jorge R., and Karageorgopoulos D.E. (2008) FASEB J., 22, 2623–2628. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Beatty S. (2016) Journal metrics in Scopus: Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP). https://blog.scopus.com/posts/journal-metrics-in-scopus-source-normalized-impact-per-paper-snip [accessed 3 July 2018].
- 25.Moed H.F. (2010) J. Informetr., 4, 265–277. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Hirsch J.E. (2005) Proc. Natl Acad Sci. USA, 102, 16569–16572. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Jones T., Huggett S., and Kamalski J (2011) World Neurosurg., 76, 36–38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Google Scholar (n.d.) Google Scholar citations. https://scholar.google.com/intl/en/scholar/citations.html [accessed 8 July 2018].
- 29.Egghe L. (2006) Scientometrics, 69, 131–152. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Harzing A-W.1. (2016) Metrics: h and g-index. https://harzing.com/resources/publish-or-perish/tutorial/metrics/h-and-g-index [accessed 30 July 2018].
- 31.Altmetric (n.d.) Discover the attention surrounding your research. https://www.altmetric.com/ [accessed 31 July 2018].
- 32.Semantic Scholar (2018) Frequently asked questions. https://www.semanticscholar.org/faq#advantages-of-semantic-scholar [accessed 1 August 2018].
- 33.da Silva J.A.T., and Dobranszk J (2018) Scientometrics, 115, 1107–1113. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Barnes C.S. (2016) J. Doc., 72, 878–895. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Davis P. (2018) Journals lose citations to preprint servers. https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2018/05/21/journals-lose-citations-preprint-servers-repositories/ [accessed 31 July 2018].
- 36.REF2014 Research Excellence Framework (n.d.) Citation data. http://www.ref.ac.uk/2014/about/guidance/citationdata/ [accessed 15 July 2018].
- 37.Wilsdon J., Allen L., Belfiore E. et al. (2015) The metric tide: report of the independent review of the role of metrics in research assessment and management. Higher Education Funding Council for England, UK. https://responsiblemetrics.org/the-metric-tide/ [accessed 2 August 2018]. [Google Scholar]
- 38.Higher Education Funding Council for England (2015) Metrics cannot replace peer review in the next REF. http://www.hefce.ac.uk/news/newsarchive/2015/Name,104464,en.html [accessed 6 July 2018].
- 39.Department for Business & Energy & Industrial Strategy (2016) Research excellence framework (REF) review: building on success and learning from experience. Department of Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, London, UK.https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/research-excellence-framework-review [accessed 5 July 2018]. [Google Scholar]