Skip to main content
PMC home page
Science Progress logoLink to Science Progress
. 2016 Mar 1;99(1):68–82. doi: 10.3184/003685016X14495640902331

Animal Welfare: A Social Networks Perspective

Tanja K Kleinhappel 1,✉, Elizabeth A John 2,✉, Thomas W Pike 3,✉, Anna Wilkinson 4,✉, Oliver HP Burman 5,✉
PMCID: PMC10365340  PMID: 27120815

Abstract

Social network theory provides a useful tool to study complex social relationships in animals. The possibility to look beyond dyadic interactions by considering whole networks of social relationships allows researchers the opportunity to study social groups in more natural ways. As such, network-based analyses provide an informative way to investigate the factors influencing the social environment of group-living animals, and so has direct application to animal welfare. For example, animal groups in captivity are frequently disrupted by separations, reintroductions and/or mixing with unfamiliar individuals and this can lead to social stress and associated aggression. Social network analysis of animal groups can help identify the underlying causes of these socially-derived animal welfare concerns. In this review we discuss how this approach can be applied, and how it could be used to identify potential interventions and solutions in the area of animal welfare.

Keywords: animal groups, animal management, animal welfare, captive animals, social network analysis, social organisation

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (589.3 KB).

6. References

  • 1.Dawkins M.S. (1990) Behav. Brain Sci., 13, 1–61. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Broom D.M. (1991) J. Anim. Sci., 69, 4167–4175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Dawkins M.S. (2004) Anim. Welfare, 13, 3–7. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Boissy A., Manteuffel G., Jensen M.B., Moe R.O., Spruijt B., Keeling L.J., Winckler C., Forkman B., Dimitrov I., and Langbein J. (2007) Physiol. Behav., 92, 375–397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ruis M.A.W., te Brake J.H.A., Engel B., Buist W.G., Blokhuis H.J., and Koolhaas J.M. (2001) Physiol. Behav., 73, 541–551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Rodenburg T.B., van Hierden Y.M., Buitenhuis A.J., Riedstra B., Koene P., Korte S.M., van der Poel J.J., Groothuis T.G.G., and Blokhuis H. (2004) Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 86, 291–298. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Schroder-Petersen D.L., and Simonsen H.B. (2001) Vet. J., 162, 196–210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Erhard H.W., Mendl M., and Ashley D.D. (1997) Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 54, 137–151. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.McAdie T.M., Keeling L.J., Blokhuis H.J., and Jones R.B. (2005) Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 93, 67–80. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lusseau D. (2003) P. Roy. Soc. B, 270, S186–S188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Croft D.P., Krause J., and James R. (2004) P. Roy. Soc. B, 271, 516–519. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Flack J.C., Girvan M., de Waal F.B.M., and Krakauer D.C. (2006) Nature, 439, 426–429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.McIntosh A.R., Grady C.L., Ungerleider L.G., Haxby J.V., Rapoport S.I., and Horwitz B. (1994) J. Neurosci., 14, 655–666. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Papp B., Pál C., and Hurst L.D. (2004) Nature, 429, 661–664. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Proulx S.R., Promislow D.E.L., and Phillips P.C. (2005) Trends Ecol. Evol., 20, 345–353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Pike T.W., Samanta M., Lindstrom J., and Royle N.J. (2008) P. Roy. Soc. B, 275, 2515–2520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Asher L., Collins L.M., Ortiz-Pelaez A., Drewe J.A., Nicol C.J., and Pfeiffer D.U. (2009) J. R. Soc. Interface, 6, 1103–1119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.McCowan B., Beisner B.A., Capitanio J.P., Jackson M.E., Cameron A.N., Seil S., Atwill E.R., and Fushing H. (2011) Plos One, 6, e22350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Dufour V., Sueur C., Whiten A., and Buchanan-Smith H.M. (2011) Am. J. Primatol., 73, 802–811. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Jones H.A.C., Noble C., Damsgard B., and Pearce G.P. (2011) Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 133, 117–126. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Jones H.A.C., Noble C., Damsgard B., and Pearce G.P. (2012) Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 138, 132–140. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Makagon M.M., McCowan B., and Mench J.A. (2012) Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 138, 152–161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Koene P., and Ipema B. (2014) Animals, 4, 93–118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Rose P.E., and Croft D.P. (2015) Anim. Welfare, 24, 123–138. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Burman O., Owen D., Abouismail U., and Mendl M. (2008) Physiol. Behav., 93, 89–96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ewbank R., and Meese G.B. (1971) Anim. Prod., 13, 685–693. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Holinger M., Früh B., and Hillmann E. (2015) Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 165, 47–56. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Simmins P.H. (1993) Anim. Prod., 57, 293–298. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Barnett J.L., Cronin G.M., McCallum T.H., Newman E.A., and Hennessy D.P. (1996) Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 50, 121–133. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Meese G., and Ewbank R. (1973) Anim. Behav., 21, 326–334. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Cronin G., Dunshea F., Butler K., McCauley I., Barnett J., and Hemsworth P. (2003) Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 81, 111–126. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Rydhmer L., Hansson M., Lundström K., Brunius C., and Andersson K. (2013) Animal, 7, 1532–1541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Arey D., and Franklin M. (1995) Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 45, 23–30. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Boyle L., and Björklund L. (2007) Anim. Welfare, 16, 259–262. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Fredriksen B., Lium B.M., Marka C.H., Mosveen B., and Nafstad O. (2008) Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 110, 258–268. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Arey D.S., and Edwards S.A. (1998) Livest. Prod. Sci., 56, 61–70. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Patison K.P., Swain D.L., Bishop-Hurley G.J., Robins G., Pattison P., and Reid D.J. (2010) Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 128, 10–17. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Gupta S., Earley B., Nolan M., Formentin E., and Crowe M.A. (2008) Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 110, 229–243. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Grant R., and Albright J. (2001) J. Dairy Sci., 84, 156–163. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Hurst J.L., Barnard C.J., Hare R., Wheeldon E.B., and West C.D. (1996) Anim. Behav., 52, 335–360. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Duncan I., and Wood-Gush D. (1972) Thwarting of feeding behaviour in the domestic fowl. Anim. Behav., 20, 444–451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Ramadan S.G.A., and Von Borell E. (2008) Brit. Poultry Sci., 49, 250–256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.McAdie T.M., and Keeling L.J. (2002) Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 75, 147–159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Nicol C.J. (1995) Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 44, 79–98. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Savory C.J. (1995) World. Poultry Sci. J., 51, 215–219. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Mason G., and Mendl M. (1993) Anim. Welfare, 2, 301–319. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Walker M., Diez-Leon M., and Mason G. (2014) Int. J. Comp. Psychol., 27, 80–100. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Dawkins M.S., Cain R., Merelie K., and Roberts S.J. (2013) Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 145, 44–50. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Dawkins M.S., Lee H.J., Waitt C.D., and Roberts S.J. (2009) Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 119, 203–209. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Roberts S.J., Cain R., and Dawkins M.S. (2012) J. R. Soc. Interface, 9, 3436–3443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Boccaletti S., Latora V., Moreno Y., Chavez M., and Hwang D.U. (2006) Phys. Rep., 424, 175–308. [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Croft D.P., James R., and Krause J. (2008) Exploring animal social networks. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey. [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Newman M.E.J. (2003) Siam. Rev., 45, 167–256. [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Freeman L.C. (1984) J. Math. Sociol., 10, 343–360. [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Sih A., Hanser S.F., and McHugh K.A. (2009) Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 63, 975–988. [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Hansen H., McDonald D.B., Groves P., Maier J.A.K., and Ben-David M. (2009) Ethology, 115, 384–396. [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Fewell J.H. (2003) Science, 301, 1867–1870. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Lusseau D. (2007) Evol. Ecol., 21, 357–366. [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Williams R., and Lusseau D. (2006) Biol. Lett., 2, 497–500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Levine J.H. (1972) Am. Sociol. Rev., 37, 14–27. [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Liben-Nowell D., and Kleinberg J. (2008) P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 105, 4633–4638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Newman M.E.J. (2002) Phys. Rev. Lett., 89, 208701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Scott J. (2011) Soc. Netw. Anal. Min., 1, 21–26. [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Wilson D.S. (1975) P. Natl. A. Sci., 72, 143–146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Beisner B.A., Jackson M.E., Cameron A., and McCowan B. (2011) Am. J. Primatol., 73, 790–801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Flack J.C., Krakauer D.C., and de Waal F.B.M. (2005) P. Roy. Soc. B, 272, 1091–1099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.McCowan B., Anderson K., Heagarty A., and Cameron A. (2008) Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 109, 396–405. [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Edenbrow M., Darden S.K., Ramnarine I.W., Evans J.P., James R., and Croft D.P. (2011) Anim. Behav., 81, 551–558. [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Kleinhappel T.K., Burman O.H.P., John E.A., Wilkinson A., and Pike T.W. (2014) Behav. Ecol., 25, 374–377. [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Krause J., Croft D.P., and James R. (2007) Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 62, 15–27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Krause J., James R., and Croft D. (2010) Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B, 365, 4099–4106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Corner L.A.L., Pfeiffer D.U., and Morris R.S. (2003) Prev. Vet. Med., 59, 147–167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Martinez-Lopez B., Perez A.M., and Sanchez-Vizcaino J.M. (2009) Transbound. Emerg. Dis., 56, 109–120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Otterstatter M.C., and Thomson J.D. (2007) Oecologia, 154, 411–421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Newman M.E.J. (2004) Phys. Rev. E, 70, 056131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Brown R.E., Schellinck H.M., and West A.M. (1996) Physiol. Behav., 60, 365–372. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Cote I.M., and Poulin R. (1995) Behav. Ecol., 6, 159–165. [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Dunbar R.I.M. (1998) Evol. Anthropol., 6, 178–190. [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Hoogland J.L. (1995) The black-tailed prairie dog: Social life of a burrowing mammal. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Wey T., Blumstein D.T., Shen W., and Jordan F. (2008) Anim. Behav., 75, 333–344. [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Whitehead H. (2008) Analyzing animal societies: Quantitative methods for vertebrate social analysis. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Krause J., Lusseau D., and James R. (2009) Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 63, 967–973. [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Borgatti S.P., Everett M.G., and Freeman L.C., Ucinet for windows: Software for social network analysis. Analytic Technologies, Harvard. [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Butts C. (2008) J. Stat. Softw., 24, 1–36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Csardi G., and Nepusz T. (2006) InterJournal, Complex Systems, 1695. [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Coleing A. (2009) Biosci. Horizons, 2, 32–43. [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Bode N.W.F., Wood A.J., and Franks D.W. (2011) Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 65, 117–130. [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Fraser D., Weary D.M., Pajor E.A., and Milligan B.N. (1997) Anim. Welfare, 6, 187–205. [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Godfrey S.S., Bull C.M., James R., and Murray K. (2009) Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 63, 1045–1056. [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Littin K., Acevedo A., Browne W., Edgar J., Mendl M., Owen D., Sherwin C., Wurbel H., and Nicol C. (2008) P. Roy. Soc. B, 275, 1865–1874. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Mench J.A., and Mason G.J. (1997) In: Appleby M.C., and Hughes B.O. (eds), Animal Welfare, pp. 127–141. CAB International, Wallingford, CT. [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Jeppesen L.L., Heller K.E., and Dalsgaard T. (2000) Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 68, 85–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Stookey J.M., and Gonyou H.W. (1994) J. Anim. Sci., 72, 2804–2811. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Burman O., McGowan R., Mendl M., Norling Y., Paul E., Rehn T., and Keeling L. (2011) Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 132, 160–168. [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Mendl M., Burman O.H.P., and Paul E.S. (2010) P. Roy. Soc. B, 277, 2895–2904. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Sherwin C., Lewis P., and Perry G. (1999) Brit. Poultry Sci., 40, 592–598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Drews C. (1993) Behaviour, 125, 283–313. [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Hemelrijk C.K., Wantia J., and Gygax L. (2005) Behaviour, 142, 1037–1058. [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Murchison C. (1935) Pedagog. Semin. J. Gen., 46, 76–102. [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Vervaecke H., De Bonte L., Maertens L., Tuyttens F., Stevens J.M.G., and Lips D. (2010) World Rabbit Sci., 18, 139–149. [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Langbein J., and Puppe B. (2004) Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 87, 293–315. [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Shizuka D., and McDonald D.B. (2012) Anim. Behav., 83, 925–934. [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Curry O., and Dunbar R.I.M. (2011) Biol. Lett., 7, 651–653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Abramson G., and Kuperman M. (2001) Phys. Rev. E, 63, 030901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Science Progress are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications

RESOURCES