Abstract
Styrene dyes are useful imaging probes and fluorescent sensors due to their strong fluorogenic responses to environmental changes or binding macromolecules. Previously, indole-containing styrene dyes have been reported to selectively bind RNA in the nucleolus and cytoplasm. However, the application of these indole-based dyes in cell imaging is limited by their moderate fluorescence enhancement and quantum yields, as well as relatively high background associated with these green-emitting dyes. In this work, we have investigated the positional and electronic effects of the electron donor by generating regioisomeric and isosteric analogues of the indole ring. Select probes exhibited large Stokes shifts, enhanced molar extinction coefficients, and bathochromic shifts in their absorption and fluorescence wavelengths. In particular, the indolizine analogues displayed high membrane permeability, strong fluorogenic responses upon binding RNA, compatibility with fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy (FLIM), low cytotoxicity, and excellent photostability. These indolizine dyes not only give rise to rapid, sensitive, and intense staining of nucleoli in live cells but can also resolve subnucleolar structures enabling highly detailed studies of nucleolar morphology. Furthermore, our dyes can partition into RNA coacervates and resolve the formation of multiphase complex coacervate droplets. These indolizine-containing styrene probes offer the highest fluorescence enhancement among the RNA-selective dyes reported in the literature; thus, these new dyes are excellent alternatives to the commercially available RNA dye, SYTO RNASelect, for visualizing RNA in live cells and in vitro.
Background
Selective labeling and visualization of cellular RNA has provided valuable knowledge and insight into RNA biology within the complex biological system.1,2 Over the years, significant efforts have been directed toward developing a variety of RNA labeling methods including, but not limited to, oligonucleotide-based hybridization probes, protein-based fluorescent reporters, RNA tagging with fluorogenic aptamers, and chemo-enzymatic modification of RNA.3−8 These developments have enabled a more precise investigation of RNA localization and dynamics. However, oligonucleotide- and protein-based methods often require expensive and complicated protocols as well as additional measures to allow for the successful delivery of the probes into cells (i.e., microinjection, plasmid transfection, and/or Cu(I)-catalyzed azide–alkyne cycloaddition), thus greatly hampering their practical use for biological imaging.9−12
Small-molecule fluorescent dyes have emerged as powerful and versatile tools for studying biological systems.13,14 Low-molecular-weight dyes are easy to use and often display good cell permeability making them ideal for staining live cells without the need for fixation and permeabilization. Additionally, small molecules have superior chemical tractability and display tunable spectral and photophysical properties compared to oligonucleotide- and protein-based fluorescent probes.13 For these reasons, it is desirable to expand the current repertoire of fluorescent dyes for studying live-cell dynamics. There are many commercially available fluorescent dyes that populate the visible spectrum and stain a variety of organelles such as the nucleus (via binding chromosomal DNA), mitochondria, and lysosomes in live cells. However, cell-permeable small-molecule dyes for imaging RNA are severely lacking.15 To date, SYTO RNASelect (SYTO) is the only commercially available RNA dye compatible with live-cell imaging, yet its properties leave much to be desired.16−18 For instance, the excitation and emission wavelength of SYTO, which are in the blue and green regions of the visible spectrum (λex = ∼490 nm; λem = ∼530 nm), are more susceptible to scattering and inducing phototoxicity in cells and exhibit significant background fluorescence in biological samples compared to longer-wavelength dyes. SYTO displays low photostability, poor aqueous solubility, and limited cell permeability, which restricts its use in time-sensitive and time-dependent imaging experiments. Finally, the structure of SYTO is undisclosed and its binding mode to RNA remains elusive, making it difficult to optimize its spectral and photophysical properties.
Previous efforts from two research groups have been dedicated toward the development of two indole-based “push–pull” styrene fluorophores (MPI and IN), reported to selectively stain RNA in live cells.19,20 Methyl pyridinium indole (MPI) and IN both contain methyl pyridinium as the electron acceptor and an indole ring as the donor (Figure 1). In solution, free MPI and IN are virtually nonfluorescent, producing little background fluorescence. However, upon binding RNA, they exhibit greatly elevated fluorescence intensity. This attribute of “turn-on” fluorescence is particularly advantageous for sensing and imaging because fluorescence is only activated upon interaction with their biological targets, resulting in low background signals and high-contrast images.21 MPI and IN absorb and emit in the blue-green range of the visible spectrum (∼440 and ∼540 nm) with the former reported to have a fluorescence quantum yield of 32%, roughly double that of SYTO (17%). Although MPI was found to display more favorable photophysical properties (e.g., higher photostability and larger Stokes shift) compared to SYTO, it was still difficult to generate high-contrast images because of its low quantum yield. Attracted by the small size and RNA selectivity of MPI-like dyes, we sought to improve the quantum yield, photostability, fluorogenic response, and emission wavelength of styrene dyes through chemical modifications.
Figure 1.
Chemical structures of the previously reported styrene-based RNA-selective dyes, MPI and IN, and the new dyes 1a–1d reported in the current study. The electron donor and acceptor moieties are highlighted in blue and red, respectively.
We hypothesized that the spectral and photophysical properties of styrene dyes, such as MPI and IN, can be improved via modification of the indole donor. Herein, we tested this hypothesis by synthesizing and characterizing a panel of novel styrene dyes, which consist of regioisomeric and isosteric analogues of MPI and IN (Figure 1). The new styrene analogues not only retain their turn-on fluorescence upon binding RNA but also demonstrate red-shifted absorption and emission wavelengths. In particular, two indolizine-containing dyes displayed improved quantum yields, high photostability, and substantially greater fluorescence enhancement (>7-fold and >2-fold increase) upon binding RNA compared to MPI. These indolizine-containing dyes are also compatible with fluorescence lifetime imaging (FLIM) and can be used to resolve nucleoli in cells and multiphase separation in RNA coacervates.
Results and Discussion
Design and Synthesis of Dyes 1a–1d
MPI and IN were used as the parental compounds in the design of new styrene dyes (Figure 1). We employed two strategies to modify the indole donor. One strategy involved retaining the indole donor and changing the substitution position on the indole ring while the other involved replacing the indole with its isostere, indolizine, another electron-rich arene. These strategies led to the design of two regioisomeric analogues (1a and 1b) and two isosteric analogues (1c and 1d) of MPI and IN.
The synthesis of compounds 1a–1d is illustrated in Scheme 1. Indolizine was synthesized through a palladium-catalyzed intramolecular cyclization of 2-pyridinepropanol, and subsequently converted into the formyl indolizine intermediates (2c and 2d) using the Vilsmeier-Haack reaction based on previously reported procedures.22,23 In the final step, the formyl-indoles (2a and 2b) and formyl-indolizines (2c and 2d) underwent a Knoevenagel condensation reaction with N-methyl-4-methyl pyridinium to yield the styrene probes 1a–1d. The products were characterized by 1H NMR, 13C NMR, and MS (Supporting Information) with all of the spectroscopic data in agreement with the proposed chemical structures.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of the Styrene Dyes 1a–1d.
Spectral and Photophysical Characterization of 1a–1d
After synthesis of the styrene dyes, their photophysical properties were evaluated. The spectral and photophysical properties (absorption, emission, molar absorptivity (ε), fluorescence quantum yield (ΦF), and fluorescence enhancement) of probes 1a–1d were measured in DMSO, T.E. buffer (Tris–HCl, 1 mM EDTA, pH = 7.5), and RNA (200 μg/mL in T.E. buffer). The absorbance and emission spectra of 1a–1d are shown in Figures 2a–c and S1a,b, and their photophysical properties are summarized in Table 1.
Figure 2.
Absorption and emission spectra of (a) 1c, (b) 1d, and (c) MPI in T.E. buffer (pH 7.5) or RNA (Type IV RNA from torula yeast; 200 μg/mL). Dye concentration: 10 μM. Dashed and solid lines indicate absorbance and emission, respectively. (d) Comparison of fluorescence intensity between MPI, 1c, and 1d in buffer vs dyes in RNA solution (200 μg/mL) dye concentration 10 μM. Dashed lines reflect the fluorescence intensity of unbound dye, and solid lines indicate the fluorescence intensity of dyes in RNA solution. (e) Fluorescence titration of 1c (10 μM) incubated with increasing concentration of nucleic acids or protein (BSA; bovine serum albumin).
Table 1. Photophysical Properties of Styrene-Based Fluorescent Molecules.
probe | solventa | λabsb | εc | λemd | Stokes shift (nm) | Φfe,f(%) | fluorescence enhancement |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1a | DMSO | 436 | 29400 | 592 | 156 | 2.1 | |
T.E. | 422 | 20600 | 584 | 162 | 0.12 | 1 | |
RNA | 434 | 19300 | 586 | 152 | 9.9 | 83 | |
1b | DMSO | 426 | 35400 | 570 | 160 | 1.3 | |
T.E. | 410 | 24400 | 568 | 142 | 0.12 | 1 | |
RNA | 416 | 23300 | 552 | 136 | 3.9 | 33 | |
1c | DMSO | 518 | 36000 | 606 | 88 | 2.0 | |
T.E. | 510 | 27500 | 596 | 86 | 0.10 | 1 | |
RNA | 556 | 27500 | 608 | 76 | 49 | 490 | |
1d | DMSO | 496 | 40300 | 586 | 90 | 3.3 | |
T.E. | 486 | 34600 | 572 | 86 | 0.38 | 1 | |
RNA | 502 | 29400 | 584 | 82 | 50 | 132 | |
MPI | DMSO | 440 | 30500 | 538 | 98 | 3.7 | |
T.E. | 430 | 26500 | 540 | 110 | 0.52 | 1 | |
RNA | 442 | 21200 | 534 | 92 | 32 | 62 |
DMSO: dimethyl sulfoxide. T.E. buffer: 10 mM Tris–HCl, 1 mM EDTA, pH = 7.5. RNA: 200 μg/mL type IV torula yeast.
Absorbance maximum wavelength (nm).
Molar absorptivity (M–1 cm–1).
Fluorescence maximum wavelength (nm).
Fluorescence quantum yield of dyes using Coumarin 6 (Φ500 =0.78) and Rhodamine 6G (Φ548 = 0.95).
Fluorescence quantum yield of dyes incubating with nucleotides using integrating sphere. Quantum yield data were averaged from duplicate experiments.
We observed slight solvatochromic shifts in the absorbance and emission spectra of 1a–1d in DMSO and T.E buffer. These dyes are slightly more red-shifted in DMSO and RNA than in T.E. buffer. In T.E. buffer, 1a and 1b exhibited maximum absorbance wavelengths at 422 and 410 nm and a broad emission band centered at 584 and 568 nm, respectively, indicative of a charge transfer excited state.24 There are slight differences in the absorption and emission wavelengths of 1a and 1b, consistent with the minor structural and electronic differences between the two analogues. Dyes 1a and 1b exhibited large Stokes shifts of 162 and 142 nm with molar absorptivity values of 20,600 and 24,400 M–1 cm–1. As expected, the fluorescence quantum yields of the free dyes in solution were low (0.12% for 1a and 1b) which is consistent with the ability of styrene dyes to dissipate energy through rotation leading to nonradiative relaxation to the ground state.25−27 Direct comparison of the photophysical properties of regioisomers MPI and 1a showed that both dyes shared similar absorption wavelengths while the emission wavelength of 1a was significantly red-shifted (>50 nm) compared to that of MPI. The differences in the photophysical properties observed for the indole regioisomers may be explained by how electrons move through the conjugated π-system between the two resonance forms of the styrene dyes (Figure S10). Such qualitative analysis reveals that the electron transfer within 1a and 1b spans larger conjugated π-systems than that of MPI. Thus, the conjugated π-system of the 2-indole derivatives participates in electron transfer to a higher degree than those of the 3-indole derivates. This may account for the observed red-shifted emission of 1a and 1b compared to MPI.
The indolizine dyes 1c and 1d displayed a significant red shift in both absorption (510 and 486 nm) and emission (596 and 572 nm) wavelengths (Figure 2a,b and Table 1). The size difference between the conjugated π-system undergoing electron movement may account for the observed bathochromic shift of the indolizine dyes. Dyes 1c and 1d show narrow emission bands and moderate solvatochromic effects which supports that emission occurs from a locally excited state.28,291c and 1d displayed a large Stokes shift of 86 nm and molar absorptivity values of 27,500 and 34,600 M–1 cm–1. As expected, the fluorescence quantum yields of the free dyes in T.E. buffer were low, with values at 0.10 and 0.38% for 1c and 1d, respectively.
Fluorogenic Response of 1a–1d to RNA In Vitro
To determine the fluorescence change of 1a-1d in the presence of RNA, we incubated the dyes (10 μM) with torula yeast type IV RNA in T.E. buffer and measured the spectral and photophysical parameters as described above. Fold-enhancement values were calculated by taking the ratio of the quantum yield of dyes in RNA solution over free dyes. Dyes 1a and 1b exhibited an 83- and 33-fold fluorescence enhancement with modest quantum yields of 9.9 and 3.9%, respectively (Table 1 and Figure S1a,b). While 1a displayed a similar degree of fluorescence enhancement compared to MPI, 1b displayed only a 33-fold fluorescence enhancement, roughly half the observed fluorescence enhancement of MPI. This data suggests that a methyl substituent on the indole nitrogen can enhance quantum yields possibly due to the electron-donating effect imparted by the methyl group.
The indolizine dyes 1c and 1d showed a significant increase in fluorescence intensity upon addition of RNA with absolute quantum yield values of 49 and 50% (Table 1 and Figure 2a,b). We observed a remarkable 490- and 132-fold fluorescence enhancement of 1c and 1d in response to binding RNA. Notably, the quantum yield and fluorogenic response of indolizine-containing dyes (1c and 1d) are much higher than those of indole-containing dyes (1a, 1b, and MPI). When 1c was incubated with DNA, it generated a lower fluorogenic response than dyes incubated with RNA (Figure 2e), indicating a moderate selectivity for RNA over DNA in vitro. Upon incubation with the same RNA species, 1c demonstrated a substantially higher fluorogenic response than SYTO RNASelect (Figure S1c). Additionally, we confirmed that 1c can stain RNA in PAGE-gels, although its sensitivity was lower than the commercial standard, SYBR Gold (Figure S2). We speculate that the smaller size of 1c than commercial cyanine dyes, such as SYBR Gold, may be responsible for its comparatively lower sensitivity in vitro when staining RNA in gels. Given that 1c and 1d display the most favorable spectral and photophysical qualities among our styrene dyes, we chose to further characterize these indolizine dyes in subsequent in vitro and cell imaging experiments.
Live- and Fixed-Cell Imaging Using 1c and 1d
To determine the cellular localization of 1c and 1d, live HeLa cells were stained with 20 μM of either dye for 30 min prior to image acquisition. Fluorescence signals of 1c and 1d can be seen primarily within the nucleoli and cytoplasm (Figure 3), and the nucleus is otherwise dark, consistent with preferential binding of the dyes to RNA. The localization of 1c and 1d was similar to HeLa cells stained with MPI. The intensity and contrast of HeLa cell images obtained using 1c or 1d are substantially higher than those of MPI, consistent with the higher quantum yield and fold-enhancement observed with the indolizine dyes (Table 1). Viewing the fluorescence images of 1c at higher magnification, we observed distinguishable fiber-like structures distributed throughout the cytoplasm that resemble mitochondrial staining profiles (Figure S3). This can be explained by the lipophilic, cationic character of 1c, which allow for accumulation in the mitochondria similar to established mitochondrial dyes (e.g., MitoView and MitoTracker) due to the negative mitochondrial membrane potential.30,31 The validity of these structures as mitochondria was further confirmed through our dynamic imaging data, which exhibited their movement within the cytoplasm (Supporting Video 1).
Figure 3.
Confocal fluorescence images of live HeLa cells incubated with 20 μM MPI (λex = 470 nm, λem = 525–555 nm), 1c (λex = 550 nm, λem = 580–620 nm), and 1d (λex = 500 nm, λem = 560–600 nm) for 30 min. TPC: transmission phase contrast. Scale bar: 10 μm.
Our dyes displayed excellent kinetics and sensitivity for imaging nucleoli in live cells. Nucleoli could be clearly discerned as early as 30 s after addition of either 1c or 1d in the medium, while no signals from SYTO could be detected even after 30 min of incubation following the manufacturer’s protocol (Figure S4). A dose–response study revealed that nanomolar concentrations of 1c were sufficient for visualizing nucleoli in live HeLa cells (Figure S5). Incubating cells with higher concentrations of SYTO resulted in dye aggregates that can be seen as bright droplets in the medium (Figure S5b).
To determine whether dyes 1c and 1d show similar localization profiles under fixed conditions, HeLa cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) before staining with either dye. We found that 1c and 1d show qualitatively similar labeling patterns as observed with live-cell imaging, with fluorescence signals predominantly coming from the nucleoli and cytoplasm. As expected, fixation abolished the mitochondrial membrane potential and the fiber-like appearance of the staining was absent in the cytoplasm. The nucleolar staining of 1c was confirmed to be RNA-dependent via an experiment in which fixed HeLa cells were treated with RNase (Figure S6). Additionally, co-staining HeLa cells with SYTO and 1c resulted in co-localization of the two dyes in nucleoli (Figure S7).
To assess the counterstaining compatibility of probes 1c and 1d, we stained HeLa cells with either 1c or 1d and Hoechst 33342 (Figure 4a). Fluorescence signals from the dyes can be clearly seen within nucleolar and cytoplasmic structures while Hoechst 33342 signals are restricted within the nucleus, as expected. The data suggest that fluorescence signals from 1c-1d and Hoechst 33342 are distinct and that the two types of dyes are compatible in co-staining experiments.
Figure 4.
(a) Confocal fluorescence images of PFA-fixed HeLa cells incubated with 20 μM 1c and 1d for 30 min and 1 μg/mL Hoechst 33342 for 30 min. Scale bar: 10 μm. (b) Zoomed-in image of HeLa cells stained with 20 μM 1c for 30 min. Image shows the subnucleolar components FC (indicated by the white arrowhead), DFC, and GC (indicated by the white arrows). TPC: transmission phase contrast. Scale bar: 3 μm.
We investigated whether our indolizine dyes could resolve the substructures of the nucleolus. Morphologically, the nucleolus is divided into a fibrillar center (FC), a dense fibrillar component (DFC), and an outer granular component (GC) all with distinct functions in ribosome biogenesis.32 Enlarged images of the nucleolus clearly show 1c is able to reveal distinct subnucleolar regions by fluorescence microscopy (Figure 4b). The images show the GC intensely stained by 1c while the FC and DFC appear as much dimmer cavities within the nucleolus. These observations can be attributed to the presence of RNA within the subnucleolar structures. The GC, rich in rRNA and ribosomal proteins, contain pre-ribosomal subunits while the FC contains clusters of condensed rDNA chromatin.33,34 The fluorescence images obtained using 1c are corroborated by transmission phase contrast, in which the nucleolar structures can be discerned albeit with lower resolution (Figure 4b).32,35 These data suggest that 1c can be used to visualize and study subnucleolar structures and nucleolar morphology in live and fixed cells.
To further characterize our dyes in cells, we performed fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy (FLIM) to study whether our dyes display unique fluorescence lifetimes in cells. We observed four distinct fluorescence lifetime species of 1c depending on its subcellular locations: nucleolus (3.4 ns), nucleus (2.5 ns), cytoplasm (1.6 ns), and unbound dye (0.82 ns). We utilized the phasor approach to FLIM analysis, as it provides a powerful fit-free tool to characterize and display differences in dye microenvironment through a graphical interface with imaging data.36,37Figure 5 shows a side-by-side comparison of intensity-based and FLIM phasor masked images, highlighting differences in subcellular RNA-positive microenvironments. Dyes like 1c with unique and separable lifetimes are valuable tools for differentiating multiple RNA-containing structures that are stained by the same dyes and for monitoring the dynamics of the RNA-containing structures at those locations. These data suggest that FLIM can provide a second dimension to distinguish the different cellular structures stained by the same indolizine dye.
Figure 5.
Comparison of intensity and FLIM phasor processed images of HeLa cells stained with 1c (20 μM). Separation of lifetimes was performed using FLIM phasor analysis, in which very short lifetimes appear on the bottom right and very long lifetimes appear on the bottom left. The phasor plot shows four unique lifetimes (color-coded on the FLIM image), corresponding to fluorophores within the nucleolus, nucleus, cytoplasm, and surrounding media. Scale bar: 10 μm.
Cytotoxicity and Photostability
We evaluated the cytotoxicity of 1c and 1d by performing an MTT assay using HeLa cells. The cells were incubated with each dye at concentrations ranging from 0.1 to 30 μM for 24 h. Our results show that >70% of the cells remained viable after 24 h of incubation with 30 μM of either 1c or 1d (Figure S8). These indolizine-containing probes can thus be considered largely nontoxic for short-term imaging experiments. It is important to note that cytotoxicity results from repeated or prolonged exposure of fluorescently labeled cells to irradiation from high laser powers.38 Cells overexposed to irradiation may sustain damage to macromolecules and organelles which can negatively influence cell viability. Several studies have reported that red-shifted dyes are preferable to shorter-wavelength dyes (e.g., violet or blue excitation) due to the lower incidence of cell death.39−41 To minimize toxicity, several factors must be considered: the dye concentration, laser power, and excitation wavelength. In our investigation, we determined that 1c could be used at concentrations as low as 10 nM to resolve nucleoli while SYTO RNASelect required higher concentrations (>2 μM) to see fluorescent signals (Figure S5). Furthermore, the favorable photophysical properties of 1c (e.g., high quantum yield) allow for the facile acquisition of high-contrast live-cell images with low laser power, while the same could not be achieved with SYTO. Finally, the excitation wavelength of both 1c and 1d are relatively more red-shifted compared to SYTO (Table 1). Having longer excitation wavelengths comes with many advantages including reduced photobleaching (Figure 6), increased tissue penetration, and reduced autofluorescence.42
Figure 6.
Comparison of photobleaching of SYTO RNASelect, 1c, and 1d. Confocal fluorescence images of PFA-fixed HeLa cells incubated with 1c and 1d (1 μM) and SYTO RNASelect (1 μM). Scale bar: 20 μm.
We evaluated the photostability of our dyes compared to SYTO. Fixed HeLa cells were incubated with 1 μM 1c, 1d, and SYTO for 30 min and thoroughly washed to remove excess dye. The cells were exposed to continuous irradiation under a fixed laser power and imaged over a range of different time points (Figure 6). We quantitatively analyzed the fluorescence intensities at each time point and determined that 1c and 1d displayed significantly higher photostability, with a half-life (t1/2) of ∼13 min. In contrast, SYTO displayed a t1/2 of ∼1.5 min which is >8-fold less than that of 1c and 1d (Figures 6 and S9). These results suggest that 1c and 1d are suitable for longer imaging experiments without the issue of photobleaching.
Detection of RNA Coacervates Using 1c
Liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) has emerged as a new paradigm in the study of cellular processes.43 LLPS is thought to be the underlying mechanism behind the formation of intracellular membraneless organelles (MLO) such as nucleoli and P granules.43−45 Studying these MLOs can provide insight into the molecular basis of disease.44,46 Thus, research efforts have focused on understanding their formation for further investigation of the physiology and pathophysiology of a wide range of biological processes and systems.45 The most common method used to initially detect LLPS is microscopy. Hence, the use of fluorescently labeled condensate components can enable their detection in vitro and in cells. Previous studies have utilized fluorescently labeled RNA,47,48 peptides,49 and proteins50−52 to visualize RNA coacervates, a type of droplet formed by LLPS. However, these strategies require modifying RNA and engineering proteins with exogenous fluorophores such as fluorescein and GFP. Given that 1c exhibits a remarkable fluorogenic response upon binding RNA, we hypothesized that 1c could enrich and label RNA coacervates. To test this, we devised a simple in vitro model consisting of torula yeast RNA (negative polyelectrolyte) and spermine (positive polyelectrolyte) following an adapted procedure.47,48 The coacervates were incubated with 1c and imaged using confocal fluorescence microscopy and FLIM.
We observed the formation of spherical coacervate droplets upon mixing the RNA and spermine solutions in a high ionic strength buffer. Coacervates incubated with 1c were visualized using confocal fluorescence microscopy and FLIM (Figure 7). Both intensity and FLIM images show that 1c readily partitions into RNA coacervates and exhibits intense fluorescence signals where RNA is densely concentrated. We attribute this to the cationic and lipophilic nature of 1c which favors accumulation in hydrophobic and water-poor regions while the strong fluorogenic response is due to reduced rotational freedom of the probe when bound to RNA. The phasor plot indicates the presence of a single fluorescence lifetime species which is evenly dispersed throughout the coacervate. In addition to the uniform coacervate droplets, multiphase complex coacervates are also formed under these conditions due to sufficient differences in macromolecular density driven by charge-charge interactions and critical salt concentrations.51 Interestingly, FLIM can better resolve the multiphase complex RNA coacervates (cavity-containing droplets) than that of intensity-based imaging. The different layers in the co-existing phases present distinct chemical environments that can concentrate 1c or other guest molecules to different extents. We speculate the cavity observed in Figure 7 to be a highly solvated region where fluorescence signals are quenched due to nonradiative decay. Further experiments would be needed to fully characterize the chemical environment of each phase.
Figure 7.
Partitioning of 1c (10 μM) within the RNA/spermine condensates. The top row shows images enlarged by 1×, while the bottom row shows images enlarged by a factor of 8×. The left column shows images based on fluorescence intensity alone, and the middle column shows images resolved using FLIM. The phasor plot indicates the presence of a single lifetime species of 1c (2.6 ns). Scale bar: 10 μm.
In conclusion, we developed a panel of fluorogenic styrene dyes for visualizing RNA in live cells and in RNA coacervates. Given that MPI has previously shown good cell permeability and RNA selectivity, but displays only moderate fluorescence enhancement and quantum yield, we sought to generate analogues of MPI to improve its spectral and photophysical properties while retaining its selectivity for RNA in cells. By changing the substitution position on the indole donor and replacing the indole with indolizine, we generated four novel styrene dyes 1a–1d which exhibited significantly altered spectral and photophysical profiles. Dyes 1a and 1b are mere regioisomers of MPI yet they displayed >20 nm red shift in emission wavelengths and significantly larger Stokes shifts than MPI. The positional change of the indole donor from the 3- to 2- position present an altered electronic configuration that involves a greater area in the conjugated π-system of the dye scaffold and thus lowers the overall energy of the molecule (Figure S10). Apart from the significant red-shifted emission wavelengths, dyes 1a and 1b displayed, on average, lower molar absorptivity and quantum yield values than that of MPI. Despite the excellent 83-fold fluorescence enhancement observed for 1a, its utility is limited due to its low quantum yield.
In contrast, when the indole donor was replaced with indolizine, the resulting indolizine-containing dyes exhibited improvements in not only the spectral properties but also the photophysical properties. These dyes were found to absorb and emit in the red region of the visible spectrum, making them more ideal for imaging cells and tissues. Moreover, 1c and 1d displayed high quantum yields and a remarkable fluorescence enhancement upon binding RNA. We reasoned that the donor replacement resulted in an expansion of conjugation in electron transfer to lower the overall energy of the system—similarly to what was observed for 1a and 1b (Figure S10). Rigorous computational studies are currently underway to explain the superior properties of indolizine over indole among these styrene dyes and will be reported soon.
Indolizine is a nitrogen-containing heterocycle that has found many uses in medicinal chemistry and pharmaceuticals.53,54 Recently, indolizines have been explored for applications in fluorescent and luminescent materials, notably in organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs) because of their high quantum yield and tunable fluorescence properties.55−57 Our study incorporates the indolizine moiety into a styrene scaffold for labeling RNA in live cells. Our data validate the excellent photophysical properties of indolizines especially compared to its indole isostere. To our knowledge, this study represents the first application of this interesting heterocycle in RNA-selective dyes for live-cell labeling.
We have demonstrated that 1c and 1d are compatible with both live- and fixed-cell imaging experiments and can resolve subnucleolar structures such as the FC from the surrounding GC. Additionally, our dyes have been used to capture dynamic cellular processes including mitochondria trafficking and apoptosis (Supporting Videos 1 and 2). Co-staining experiments with Hoechst 33342 suggests that our dyes are compatible with nuclear stains and are likely compatible with other organelle-specific dyes. Our data shows that 1c and 1d indeed label RNA-rich nucleoli with high sensitivity, rapid labeling kinetics (Figure S4), high contrast, and low background. We observed co-localized signals of SYTO and 1c in nucleoli indicating both dyes are associated with RNA-rich nucleoli. However, we do not observe fluorescence signals in the surrounding nucleus suggesting that 1c and 1d do not bind to chromosomal DNA via intercalation or minor groove binding. Although the exact mechanism for the binding of these styrene dyes to RNA has not been elucidated; based on our observations we hypothesize that 1c and 1d may not act as classic intercalators or minor groove binders upon binding RNA. To further improve upon these dyes, efforts must be placed in elucidating the exact binding mode of these dyes to RNA.
In addition to cell-based imaging, we show that our dyes can selectively partition and label RNA coacervates in vitro. Developing small-molecule probes that can selectively accumulate in coacervates is instrumental in studying LLPS and can serve as key tools in delineating the function of biomolecular condensates in cells and their physiological and pathophysiological roles.
Our dyes display good photostability and are noncytotoxic, making them useful for long-term, time-resolved imaging experiments. The excellent quantum yields of 1c and 1d negate the use of high laser powers to irradiate the dyes allowing for reduced incidence of phototoxicity. Given the high sensitivity of our dyes, concentrations as low as 10 nM were successfully used to resolve nucleoli (Figure S5). Our dyes display unique fluorescence lifetimes within distinct cellular and aqueous environments (i.e., nucleolus, nucleus, and cytoplasm) allowing for selective imaging based on fluorescence lifetimes. We envision our dyes to serve as excellent probes for FLIM experiments to resolve cellular structures beyond fluorescence intensity and emission wavelength. In fact, our dyes may even be compatible with other red-colored dyes (λem > 580 nm) regardless of spectral overlap. Given the excellent fluorescence properties of the novel indolizine dyes, we believe that they can serve as a better alternative to SYTO RNASelect in a wide variety of cell imaging studies. Finally, we aim to expand the utility and application of these RNA-selective fluorogenic dyes. Current efforts have been directed toward extending our library of styrene dyes by incorporating additional electron donors and acceptors onto the styrene scaffold. Furthermore, we aim to incorporate chemical moieties that can enable selective binding to RNA species of specific sequences.
Materials and Methods
Chemical Synthesis
See the Supporting Information for a detailed description of experimental methods.
Quantum Yield Measurements of 1a–1d in T.E. Buffer and RNA Solution
Coumarin 6 was used as a reference dye for MPI, 1a, and 1b and Rhodamine 6G was used as a reference for 1c and 1d. Absorption spectra were collected by Shimadzu UV-1800 spectrophotometer. Samples were loaded in plastic disposable cuvette. Emission spectra were obtained by Photon Technology International QuantaMaster model C-60 Fluorimeter in 1 × 1 cm2 quartz cuvettes. Fluorescence quantum yields were then calculated according to the method by Lawson-wood, Upstone, and Evans.58 The torula yeast type IV RNA (Sigma) solution was prepared as a 200 μg/mL solution in T.E. buffer (Tris–HCl, EDTA, pH 7.6, Bioworld) without sonicating to avoid shearing of nucleic acids. All measurements were taken using samples with a final dye concentration of 10 μM.
Fluorescence Titration of 1c
Solutions of torula yeast RNA type IV (RNA mixture) and DNA from calf thymus (Sigma) were prepared and stored at 4 °C overnight. Bovine serum albumin (BSA, Thermo Fisher) and Baker’s yeast RNA (rRNA, Sigma) solutions were prepared at 2 h before testing. 100 μL of 1 μM 1c were diluted by corresponding substrates solution reaching concentrations ranging from 0 to 1000 μg/mL of nucleic acids or BSA. The resulting mixtures were placed in a 96-well opaque plate. The plate with the mixture was gently shaken for 5 min before being tested by a microplate reader.
Comparison with SYTO RNASelect
100 μL of 1 μM 1c and SYTO RNASelect were diluted by 100 μL solutions of RNA mixture to reach final concentrations ranging from 0 to 1000 μg/mL. The resulting mixtures were placed in a 96-well opaque plate. The plate with the mixture was gently shaken for 5 min before being tested by a microplate reader (SpectraMax iD5).
General Method for Cell Culture
HeLa cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM, Thermo Fisher) supplemented with 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (FBS, Thermo Fisher) and incubated at 37 °C with 5% CO2.
Live-Cell Imaging
HeLa cells were cultured at a density of 7000 cells/well on chambered glass sides and incubated at 37 °C overnight or until fully adherent. After removing the medium and washing with DPBS (Thermo Fisher), the cells were incubated with dyes in PBS (Thermo Fisher) for 30 min at 37 °C with 5% CO2 on the microscope stage and analyzed directly. Fluorescence images were acquired using a confocal microscope (Leica SP8, Leica Microsystems) and analyzed using ImageJ. MPI (20 μM) was excited at 440 nm, SYTO RNASelect (0.1–1 μM, Thermo Fisher) was excited at 490 nm, 1c (10 nM–20 μM) was excited at 550 nm, and 1d (20 μM) was excited at 500 nm.
Time-Resolved Live-Cell Imaging
HeLa cells were cultured on eight-well chambered glass slides (iBidi μ-slides) and incubated overnight at 37 °C with 5% CO2 until totally adherent. Staining solutions for each dye were prepared in serum-free DMEM and kept warm at 37 °C. The cells were monitored from 0 to 30 min, where t = 0 is the time right before the addition of the dye. Images were acquired at t = 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 min for each dye. Fluorescence images were analyzed and quantified with ImageJ.
Fixed-Cell Imaging
HeLa cells were cultured on 6-well plates containing glass coverslips and incubated at 37 °C overnight or until fully adherent. After removing the medium and washing with DPBS, the cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 min at ambient temperature. After fixation, the cells were rinsed with PBS and incubated with dye solutions in PBS for 30 min at ambient temperature. After incubation, the dye solutions were removed and cells were gently washed with PBS three times. The coverslips were mounted onto glass slides, sealed, and analyzed using confocal microscopy.
Ribonuclease (RNase) Digest Experiment
HeLa cells were cultured in six-well plates with glass coverslips and incubated at 37 °C overnight to totally adherent. The cells were fixed according to the protocol described above with minor modifications. A solution of 4% paraformaldehyde + 0.1% Triton-X was prepared in PBS and used to fix and permeabilize HeLa cells. The cells were incubated with this solution for 20 min at room temperature. After rinsing the cells with PBS, the cells were stained with 1 μM 1c, 1d, or SYTO in PBS for 30 min at room temperature. After removing the staining solution, 0.5 mL of RNase (100 μg/mL) and PBS (negative control) was added into each respective well and incubated for 6 h. After incubation, the medium was removed, and the cells were thoroughly washed with PBS three times. The glass coverslips were mounted onto glass slides, sealed, and analyzed using confocal microscopy.
Counterstaining with Hoechst 33342
HeLa cells were cultured in six-well plates with glass coverslips and incubated at 37 °C overnight to totally adherent. The cells were fixed according to the protocol described above and stained with 20 μM 1c or 1d and 1 μg/mL Hoechst 33342 (Thermo Fisher) diluted in PBS for 30 min in the dark. After incubation with dyes, the cells were gently washed with PBS. The coverslips were mounted onto glass slides, sealed, and analyzed using confocal microscopy.
Photostability
HeLa cells were fixed, stained with 1 μM 1c and SYTO RNASelect, and mounted according to the protocol described above. The cells were analyzed using confocal microscopy and continuously irradiated at 550 nm (1c) and 490 nm (SYTO RNAselect) holding a fixed laser power. Images were taken at indicated time points (0, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, and 60 min). Fluorescence intensities were quantified using ImageJ.
In Vitro Assay for Cytotoxicity
HeLa cells were cultured (2000 cells/well) in DMEM and supplemented with 10% FBS in 96-well plates. The solution of MPI, 1c, and 1d at indicated concentrations (0, 0.1, 0.3 1, 3, 10, 30 μM) were added to each well diluted with DMEM and cells were incubated for 24 h at 37 °C with 5% CO2. The next day, 10 μL of MTT (Abcam) labeling reagent was added to the pretreated cells and incubated for 4 h. A control was prepared in the same manner by adding 10 μL of MTT labeling reagent to untreated HeLa cells. After incubation, 100 μL of solubilization reagent was added to each well and the plate was shaken at 37 °C for 15 min in an orbital shaker. Upon complete solubilization of the purpose formazan crystals, the absorbance of the samples was measured at 570 nm using a microplate reader. The absorbance of each sample was normalized with its control. MTT assays were performed in triplicates.
RNA-Spermine Condensate Preparation
A 1 wt % stock solution of torula yeast RNA type IV was prepared in nuclease-free water and stored in multiple aliquots at −20 °C. Final concentrations of RNA ranged from 0.02 to 0.4 wt %. A 1 wt % stock solution of spermine was prepared in deionized water and stored at 4 °C. The spermine (Sigma) concentration was fixed at 0.1 wt %. Dye 1c was prepared as 10 mM stock solutions in DMSO. Condensates were prepared in a 5 mM HEPES (pH 7.4, VWR), 1 mM MgCl2 buffer. Stock solutions were added in the following order for the preparation of each sample: deionized water, HEPES, MgCl2, RNA, and spermine. Samples were mixed via gentle pipetting in between the addition of each component.
Staining and Imaging of Condensates
RNA condensates were incubated with 10 μM 1c for 1 min at room temperature. To image the condensates, 20 μL of the incubated sample was added onto a glass coverslip and mounted onto a glass slide. Images were acquired using fluorescence confocal microscopy and FLIM.
Native-PAGE Gel Staining
1 L of 10× TBE running buffer was prepared by mixing 108 g of Tris Base, 55 g of boric acid, and 40 mL of 0.5 M EDTA (Apex). The combined solution was diluted to 1 L by filtered H2O. 14 mL of 8% Native-PAGE gel was prepared by mixing 0.7 mL of 10× TBE buffer, 0.14 mL of 10% APS buffer (Bio-Rad), and 3.73 mL of 30% acrylamide solution. The mixture was diluted to 14 mL with filtered water. 28 μL of TEMED (Sigma) was added to the mixture. The gel mixture was transferred into the casting frame placed in a precooled gel chamber. An 18-well cast was put on the top and left for polymerization for 15 min on ice. The gel chamber was filled with cold 0.5× TBE running buffer. The gel was pre-run at 150 V for 40 min. The RNA marker mixture was loaded (5 μL micro-RNA marker + 0.4 μL low range marker (Bio-Rad) for one well). 5 μL of rRNA sample was loaded to reach rRNA amount as 1 and 10 μg. The RNA marker and rRNA sample loading had four repeats on the same gel. The gel was run at 150 V for 30 min. The cut gels were stained and shaken in 25 mL of 1× SYBR Gold (Thermo Fisher), 2 μM 1c, 20 μM 1c, and 40 μM 1c for 15 min. The gels were de-stained with 0.5× TBE buffer and shaken for 10 min. The buffer was removed, and the gels were imaged using an Amersham Typhoon Biomolecular Imager.
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by the University of Southern California (C.Z.) and the National Institute of Health (P30 CA014089 to S.F.). M.J.K. and Y.L. were supported by the Dornsife Graduate Fellowship at USC. The authors thank the entire Zhang Lab for helpful discussions regarding the manuscript and the USC Office of The Provost for supporting the Translational Imaging Center and the Bridge Institute.
Supporting Information Available
The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acschembio.3c00141.
Photophysical spectra; gel staining; details of chemical synthesis; NMR spectra; MS spectra; time-resolved fluorescence images; fluorescence images of MitoTracker; fluorescence images with RNase treatment; fluorescence images of live Hela cells incubated with various concentrations of 1c and SYTO RNASelect; and cytotoxicity and graphical presentation of conjugated structures of our dyes (PDF)
Dynamic imaging of live HeLa cells (MP4)
Dynamic imaging of live HeLa cells undergoing apoptosis (MP4)
Author Contributions
∥ M.J.K. and Y.L. contributed equally to this work.
The authors declare the following competing financial interest(s): C. Z. is a stockholder and consultant to BridGene Biosciences.
Supplementary Material
References
- Schulz D.; Holstein J. M.; Rentmeister A. A chemo-enzymatic approach for site-specific modification of the RNA cap. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 7874–7878. 10.1002/anie.201302874. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Braselmann E.; Rathbun C.; Richards E. M.; Palmer A. E. Illuminating RNA Biology: Tools for Imaging RNA in Live Mammalian Cells. Cell Chem. Biol. 2020, 27, 891–903. 10.1016/j.chembiol.2020.06.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Antony T.; Subramaniam V. Molecular beacons: nucleic acid hybridization and emerging applications. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2001, 19, 497–504. 10.1080/07391102.2001.10506757. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Soboleski M. R.; Oaks J.; Halford W. P. Green fluorescent protein is a quantitative reporter of gene expression in individual eukaryotic cells. FASEB J. 2005, 19, 1–20. 10.1096/fj.04-3180fje. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cui C.; Shu W.; Li P. Fluorescence In situ Hybridization: Cell-Based Genetic Diagnostic and Research Applications. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2016, 4, 89 10.3389/fcell.2016.00089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Strack R. L.; Song W.; Jaffrey S. R. Using Spinach-based sensors for fluorescence imaging of intracellular metabolites and proteins in living bacteria. Nat. Protoc. 2014, 9, 146–155. 10.1038/nprot.2014.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Muttach F.; Muthmann N.; Rentmeister A. Chemo-enzymatic modification of eukaryotic mRNA. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2017, 15, 278–284. 10.1039/C6OB02144A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Paige J. S.; Wu K. Y.; Jaffrey S. R. RNA mimics of green fluorescent protein. Science 2011, 333, 642–646. 10.1126/science.1207339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bao G.; Rhee W. J.; Tsourkas A. Fluorescent probes for live-cell RNA detection. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 2009, 11, 25–47. 10.1146/annurev-bioeng-061008-124920. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kubota T.; Ikeda S.; Yanagisawa H.; Yuki M.; Okamoto A. Sets of RNA repeated tags and hybridization-sensitive fluorescent probes for distinct images of RNA in a living cell. PLoS One 2010, 5, e13003 10.1371/journal.pone.0013003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Catrina I. E.; Marras S. A.; Bratu D. P. Tiny molecular beacons: LNA/2′-O-methyl RNA chimeric probes for imaging dynamic mRNA processes in living cells. ACS Chem. Biol. 2012, 7, 1586–1595. 10.1021/cb300178a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Holstein J. M.; Stummer D.; Rentmeister A. Enzymatic modification of 5′-capped RNA with a 4-vinylbenzyl group provides a platform for photoclick and inverse electron-demand Diels-Alder reaction. Chem. Sci. 2015, 6, 1362–1369. 10.1039/C4SC03182B. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang L.; Frei M. S.; Salim A.; Johnsson K. Small-Molecule Fluorescent Probes for Live-Cell Super-Resolution Microscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 2770–2781. 10.1021/jacs.8b11134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lavis L. D.; Raines R. T. Bright ideas for chemical biology. ACS Chem. Biol. 2008, 3, 142–155. 10.1021/cb700248m. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yao Q.; Li H.; Xian L.; Xu F.; Xia J.; Fan J.; Du J.; Wang J.; Peng X. Differentiating RNA from DNA by a molecular fluorescent probe based on the ″door-bolt″ mechanism biomaterials. Biomaterials 2018, 177, 78–87. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.05.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li Q.; Kim Y.; Namm J.; Kulkarni A.; Rosania G. R.; Ahn Y. H.; Chang Y. T. RNA-selective, live cell imaging probes for studying nuclear structure and function. Chem. Biol. 2006, 13, 615–623. 10.1016/j.chembiol.2006.04.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang H.; Tian X.; Du W.; Zhang Q.; Guan L.; Wang A.; Zhang Y.; Wang C.; Zhou H.; Wu J.; Tian Y. A two-photon fluorescent RNA probe screened from a series of oxime-functionalized 2,2′:6′,2″-terpyridine ZnX2 (X = Cl, Br, I) complexes. J. Mater. Chem. B 2016, 4, 4818–4825. 10.1039/C6TB01202G. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu Y.; Meng F.; He L.; Yu X.; Lin W. Fluorescence behavior of a unique two-photon fluorescent probe in aggregate and solution states and highly sensitive detection of RNA in water solution and living systems. Chem. Commun. 2016, 52, 8838–8841. 10.1039/C6CC03746A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Guo L.; Chan M. S.; Xu D.; Tam D. Y.; Bolze F.; Lo P. K.; Wong M. S. Indole-based cyanine as a nuclear RNA-selective two-photon fluorescent probe for live cell imaging. ACS Chem. Biol. 2015, 10, 1171–1175. 10.1021/cb500927r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Song G.; Sun Y.; Liu Y.; Wang X.; Chen M.; Miao F.; Zhang W.; Yu X.; Jin J. Low molecular weight fluorescent probes with good photostability for imaging RNA-rich nucleolus and RNA in cytoplasm in living cells. Biomaterials 2014, 35, 2103–2112. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.11.052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grimm J. B.; Heckman L. M.; Lavis L. D. The chemistry of small-molecule fluorogenic probes. Prog. Mol. Biol. Transl. Sci. 2013, 113, 1–34. 10.1016/b978-0-12-386932-6.00001-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Boekelheide V.; Windgassen R. J. Syntheses of Pyrrocolines Unsubstituted in the Five-membered Ring. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1959, 81, 1456–1459. 10.1021/ja01515a044. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Fuentes O.; Paudler W. W. Some formylation reactions of imidazo[1,5-a]pyridine and pyrrocoline. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 1975, 12, 379–393. 10.1002/jhet.5570120235. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Olsen S. Locally-excited (LE) versus charge-transfer (CT) excited state competition in a series of para-substituted neutral green fluorescent protein (GFP) chromophore models. J. Phys. Chem. B 2015, 119, 2566–2575. 10.1021/jp508723d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shank N. I.; Pham H. H.; Waggoner A. S.; Armitage B. A. Twisted cyanines: a non-planar fluorogenic dye with superior photostability and its use in a protein-based fluoromodule. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 242–251. 10.1021/ja308629w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Silva G. L.; Ediz V.; Yaron D.; Armitage B. A. Experimental and computational investigation of unsymmetrical cyanine dyes: understanding torsionally responsive fluorogenic dyes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 5710–5718. 10.1021/ja070025z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ediz V.; Lee J. L.; Armitage B. A.; Yaron D. Molecular engineering of torsional potentials in fluorogenic dyes via electronic substituent effects. J. Phys. Chem. A 2008, 112, 9692–9701. 10.1021/jp805546s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schleper A. L.; Goushi K.; Bannwarth C.; Haehnle B.; Welscher P. J.; Adachi C.; Kuehne A. J. C. Hot exciplexes in U-shaped TADF molecules with emission from locally excited states. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 6179 10.1038/s41467-021-26439-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ha J. M.; Hur S. H.; Pathak A.; et al. Recent advances in organic luminescent materials with narrowband emission. NPG Asia Mater. 2021, 13, 53 10.1038/s41427-021-00318-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Sivandzade F.; Bhalerao A.; Cucullo L. Analysis of the Mitochondrial Membrane Potential Using the Cationic JC-1 Dye as a Sensitive Fluorescent Probe. BIO-PROTOC 2019, 9, e3182 10.21769/BioProtoc.3128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nödling A. R.; Mills E. M.; Li X.; Cardella D.; Sayers E. J.; Wu S. H.; Jones A. T.; Luk L. Y. P.; Tsai Y. H. Cyanine dye mediated mitochondrial targeting enhances the anti-cancer activity of small-molecule cargoes. Chem. Commun. 2020, 56, 4672–4675. 10.1039/C9CC07931A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dove B. K.; You J. H.; Reed M. L.; Emmett S. R.; Brooks G.; Hiscox J. A. Changes in nucleolar morphology and proteins during infection with the coronavirus infectious bronchitis virus. Cell. Microbiol. 2006, 8, 1147–1157. 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2006.00698.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cerqueira A. V.; Lemos B. Ribosomal DNA and the Nucleolus as Keystones of Nuclear Architecture, Organization, and Function. Trends Genet. 2019, 35, 710–723. 10.1016/j.tig.2019.07.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ide S.; Imai R.; Ochi H.; Maeshima K. Transcriptional suppression of ribosomal DNA with phase separation. Sci. Adv. 2020, 6, eabb5953 10.1126/sciadv.abb5953. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thiry M.; Lafontaine D. L. Birth of a nucleolus: the evolution of nucleolar compartments. Trends Cell Biol. 2005, 15, 194–199. 10.1016/j.tcb.2005.02.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Digman M. A.; Caiolfa V. R.; Zamai M.; Gratton E. The phasor approach to fluorescence lifetime imaging analysis. Biophys. J. 2008, 94, L14–L16. 10.1529/biophysj.107.120154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Battisti A.; Digman M. A.; Gratton E.; Storti B.; Beltram F.; Bizzarri R. Intracellular pH measurements made simple by fluorescent protein probes and the phasor approach to fluorescence lifetime imaging. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 5127–5129. 10.1039/c2cc30373f. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Icha J.; Weber M.; Waters J. C.; Norden C. Phototoxicity in live fluorescence microscopy, and how to avoid it. BioEssays 2017, 39, 1700003 10.1002/bies.201700003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wäldchen S.; Lehmann J.; Klein T.; van de Linde S.; Sauer M. Light-induced cell damage in live-cell super-resolution microscopy. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 15348 10.1038/srep15348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Douthwright S.; Sluder G. Live Cell Imaging: Assessing the Phototoxicity of 488 and 546 nm Light and Methods to Alleviate it. J. Cell. Physiol. 2017, 232, 2461–2468. 10.1002/jcp.25588. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kilian N.; Goryaynov A.; Lessard M. D.; Hooker G.; Toomre D.; Rothman J. E.; Bewersdorf J. Assessing photodamage in live-cell STED microscopy. Nat. Methods 2018, 15, 755–756. 10.1038/s41592-018-0145-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chica R. A.; Moore M. M.; Allen B. D.; Mayo S. L. Generation of longer emission wavelength red fluorescent proteins using computationally designed libraries. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2010, 107, 20257–20262. 10.1073/pnas.1013910107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Babinchak W. M.; Dumm B. K.; Venus S.; Boyko S.; Putnam A. A.; Jankowsky E.; Surewicz W. K. Small molecules as potent biphasic modulators of protein liquid-liquid phase separation. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 5574 10.1038/s41467-020-19211-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Alberti S.; Gladfelter A.; Mittag T. Considerations and Challenges in Studying Liquid-Liquid Phase Separation and Biomolecular Condensates. Cell 2019, 176, 419–434. 10.1016/j.cell.2018.12.035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lu J.; Qian J.; Xu Z.; Yin S.; Zhou L.; Zheng S.; Zhang W. Emerging Roles of Liquid-Liquid Phase Separation in Cancer: From Protein Aggregation to Immune-Associated Signaling. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2021, 9, 631486 10.3389/fcell.2021.631486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Alberti S.; Hyman A. A. Biomolecular condensates at the nexus of cellular stress, protein aggregation disease and ageing. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2021, 22, 196–213. 10.1038/s41580-020-00326-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Aumiller W. M. Jr; Cakmak F. P.; Davis B. W.; Keating C. D. RNA-Based Coacervates as a Model for Membraneless Organelles: Formation, Properties, and Interfacial Liposome Assembly. Langmuir 2016, 32, 10042–10053. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b02499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Marianelli A. M.; Miller B. M.; Keating C. D. Impact of macromolecular crowding on RNA/spermine complex coacervation and oligonucleotide compartmentalization. Soft Matter 2018, 14, 368–378. 10.1039/C7SM02146A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Niu J.; Qiu C.; Abbott N. L.; Gellman S. H. Formation of versus Recruitment to RNA-Rich Condensates: Controlling Effects Exerted by Peptide Side Chain Identity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022, 144, 10386–10395. 10.1021/jacs.2c02222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lu T.; Liese S.; Schoenmakers L.; Weber C. A.; Suzuki H.; Huck W. T. S.; Spruijt E. Endocytosis of Coacervates into Liposomes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022, 144, 13451–13455. 10.1021/jacs.2c04096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lu T.; Spruijt E. Multiphase Complex Coacervate Droplets. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 2905–2914. 10.1021/jacs.9b11468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Patel A.; Lee H. O.; Jawerth L.; Maharana S.; Jahnel M.; Hein M. Y.; Stoynov S.; Mahamid J.; Saha S.; Franzmann T. M.; Pozniakovski A.; Poser I.; Maghelli N.; Royer L. A.; Weigert M.; Myers E. W.; Grill S.; Drechsel D.; Hyman A. A.; Alberti S. A Liquid-to-Solid Phase Transition of the ALS Protein FUS Accelerated by Disease Mutation. Cell 2015, 162, 1066–1077. 10.1016/j.cell.2015.07.047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shen Y. M.; Lv P. C.; Chen W.; Liu P. G.; Zhang M. Z.; Zhu H. L. Synthesis and antiproliferative activity of indolizine derivatives incorporating a cyclopropylcarbonyl group against Hep-G2 cancer cell line. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2010, 45, 3184–3190. 10.1016/j.ejmech.2010.02.056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sharma V.; Kumar V. Indolizine: a biologically active moiety. Med. Chem. Res. 2014, 23, 3593–3606. 10.1007/s00044-014-0940-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Song Y. R.; Lim C. W.; Kim T. W. Synthesis and photophysical properties of 1,2-diphenylindolizine derivatives: fluorescent blue-emitting materials for organic light-emitting device. Luminescence 2016, 31, 364–371. 10.1002/bio.2968. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wan J.; Zheng C.-J.; Fung M.-K.; Liu X.-K.; Lee C.-S.; Zhang X.-H. Multifunctional electron-transporting indolizine derivatives for highly efficient blue fluorescence, orange phosphorescence host and two-color based white OLEDs. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 4502–4510. 10.1039/c2jm14904d. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Kim T.; Kim J.. Color-Tunable Indolizine-Based Fluorophores and Fluorescent pH Sensor Molecules 271–12. 10.3390/molecules27010012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lawson-Wood K.; Upstone S.; Evans K. Determination of Relative Fluorescence Quantum Yields using the FL6500 Fluorescence Spectrometer. Fluoresc. Spectrosc. 2018, 4, 1–5. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.