Abstract
There may be no greater testament to the resilience of language in humans than the observation that, when deprived of a language entirely, children will invent one nonetheless. Deaf children whose access to usable conventional linguistic input, signed or spoken, is severely limited develop gesture systems to communicate with the hearing individuals around them. The children's gestures resemble natural language in that they are structured at both sentence and word levels. Although the inclination to use gesture to communicate may be traceable to the fact that the deaf children's hearing parents (like all speakers) gesture as they talk, the deaf children themselves appear to be responsible for introducing language-like structure into their gestures. In particular, the structural properties found in the deaf children's gesture systems cannot be traced to the gestures that their hearing parents use with them, nor can they be traced to the way in which the parents respond to the children's gestures.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.1 MB).
References
- 1.Seidenberg M. S. & Petitto L.A. (1979) Signing behavior in apes: A critical review. Cognition, 7, 177–215. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Marcus G. F., Pinker S., Ullman M., Hollander M., Rosen T.J. & Xu F. (1992). Overregularization in language acquisition. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 57(4), serial no. 228. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Singleton J. L. & Newport E. L. (1987) When learners surpass their models: The acquisition of American Sign Language from impoverished input. Paper presented at the Society for Research in Child Development, Baltimore, Md. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ross D. S. & Newport E. L. (1996) The development of language from non-native linguistic input. In: Stringfellow A., Cahana-Amitay D., Hughes E. & Zukowski A. (Eds.), Proc. 20th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, Vol. 2, pp. 634-645. Cascilla Press, Somerville, MA. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Newport E. L. & Meier R. P. (1985) The acquisition of American Sign Language. In: Slobin D. I. (ed.) The cross-linguistic study of language acquisition, Vol. 1: The data, pp. 881–938. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum Associates. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Mayberry R. I. (1992) The cognitive development of deaf children: Recent insights. In: Segalowitz S. & Rapin I. (eds), Child Neuropsychology, Vol. 7, Handbook of Neuropsychology; pp. 51–68, Boiler F. & Graffman J. (Series eds). Elsevier, Amsterdam. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Acredolo L. P. & Goodwyn S. W. (1988). Symbolic gesturing in normal infants. Child Development, 59, 450–466. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Goldin-Meadow S. (1998). The development of gesture and speech as an integrated system. In: Iverson J. M. & Goldin-Meadow S (eds), The nature and functions of gesture in children's communications, (pp. 29–42). In the New Directions for Child Development series, No. 79, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Goldin-Meadow S. & Feldman H. (1977). The development of language-like communication without a language model. Science, 197, 401–403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Feldman H., Goldin-Meadow S. & Gleitman L. (1978) Beyond Herodotus: The creation of language by linguistically deprived deaf children. In Lock A. (ed.) Action, symbol, and gesture: The emergence of language, pp. 351–414. Academic Press, New York. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Goldin-Meadow S. & Mylander C. (1984) Gestural communication in deaf children: The effects and non-effects of parental input on early language development. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 49, No. 207. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Goldin-Meadow S., Mylander C. & Butcher C. (1995) The resilience of combinatorial structure at the word level: Morphology in self-styled gesture systems. Cognition, 56, 195–262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Morford J. P. & Goldin-Meadow S. (1997) From here to there and now to then: The development of displaced reference in homesign and English. Child Development, 68, 420–435. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Silverstein M. (1976) Hierarchy of features and ergativity. In: Dixon R. M. W. (ed.), Grammatical categories in Australian languages, pp. 112–171. Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies, Canberra. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Shatz M. (1982). On mechanisms of language acquisition: Can features of the communicative environment account for development? In: Wanner E. & Gleitman L. R. (eds), Language acquisition: The state of the art, pp. 102–127. Cambridge University Press, New York. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Goldin-Meadow S. & Mylander C. (1983) Gestural communication in deaf children: The non-effects of parental input on language development. Science, 221, 372–374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Bruner J. (1974/75) From communication to language: A psychological perspective. Cognition, 3, 255–287. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Chen C. & Uttal D.H. (1988) Cultural values, parents’ beliefs, and children's achievement in the United States and China. Human Development, 31, 351–358. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Stevenson H. W., Lee S.-L., Chen C., Stigler J. W., Hsu C.-C. & Kitamura S. (1990) Contexts of achievement. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 55, No. 221. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Wang X-1., Mylander C. & Goldin-Meadow S. (1995) The resilience of language: Mother-child interaction and its effects on the gesture systems of Chinese and American deaf children. In: Emmorey K. & Reilly J. (eds), Language, gesture, and space, pp. 411–433. Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, N.J. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Goldin-Meadow S. & Mylander C. (1998) Spontaneous gesture systems created by deaf children in two cultures. Nature, 391, 279–281 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Waddington C. H. (1957) The strategy of the genes. London: Allen & Unwin. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Gottlieb G. (1991) Experiential canalization of behavioral development: Theory. Developmental Psychology, 27, 4–13. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Goldin-Meadow S., McNeill D. & Singleton J. (1996) Silence is liberating: Removing the handcuffs on grammatical expression in the manual modality. Psychological Review, 103, 34–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]