Skip to main content
PMC home page
International Journal of General Medicine logoLink to International Journal of General Medicine
. 2023 Jul 21;16:3083–3094. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S418520

Correlation Between Glycemic Variability and Diabetic Complications: A Narrative Review

Lining Huang 1, Ying Pan 1, Kaixin Zhou 2, Hongying Liu 3,✉, Shao Zhong 1,✉
PMCID: PMC10368016  PMID: 37496596

Abstract

Diabetes mellitus is a metabolic disorder with a complex etiology in which glycemic dynamics are disturbed and the body is unable to maintain the process of glucose homeostasis through the pancreas. Persistent symptoms of high blood glucose or low blood glucose may lead to diabetic complications, such as neuropathy, nephropathy, retinopathy, and cardiovascular diseases. Glycemic variability which can represent the presence of excessive glycemic excursions is an indicator for evaluating glucose homoeostasis. Limiting glycemic variability has gradually become an emerging therapeutic target in improve diabetes metabolism and prevent associated complications. This article reviews the progress of research on the various quantifiable parameters of glycemic variability and their relationships with vascular lesions and mechanisms.

Keywords: diabetes mellitus, glycemic variability, glycemic variability parameters, vascular lesions of diabetes mellitus

Introduction

Diabetes is a common lifelong chronic disease whose prevalence continues to increase worldwide. The chronic high blood glucose levels caused by the disease have a negative impact on the blood vessels, leading to the development of several diabetes-related vascular diseases, such as diabetic microvascular complications and diabetic macrovascular complications.1 Research has shown that people with diabetes are 2–4 times more likely to develop cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease than those without diabetes. Pre-diabetes also increases the risk of developing macrovascular disease.2 Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and heart failure have a significantly increased risk of death.3 In addition, hyperglycemia can also damage the small blood vessels of the kidney, leading to the development of diabetic nephropathy (DN).4 The onset and progression of these complications in people with diabetes continually reduces their quality of life and even threatens their lives.

Chronic low-grade inflammation is common in patients with diabetes and is considered one of the major factors contributing to diabetes-related complications. Recent studies have shown that a novel adipokine, neuregulin-4 (Nrg-4), can regulate glucose and lipid metabolism, reduce chronic inflammation and predict the risk of microvascular complications in patients with early-stage T2DM.5 Serum levels of Nrg-4 are negatively correlated with glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and microalbuminuria. The inflammatory marker C-reactive protein (CRP) is also considered an independent risk factor for DN.6 The monocyte/lymphocyte ratio (MLR), a novel inflammation index, is significantly positively correlated with microalbuminuria7 and has some predictive power for diabetic retinopathy (DR).8 In addition, glycemic fluctuations, also known as glycemic variability, are important factors in the development of diabetes-related complications. Previous studies have shown that dynamic fluctuations in blood glucose between high and low levels can activate oxidative stress pathways, exacerbate endothelial cell dysfunction and chronic inflammation, promote platelet activation, alter gene expression, and consequently lead to vascular damage, increasing the risk of diabetes-related complications.9–11 In recent years, the assessment of blood glycemic variability has been increasingly enriched. More and more research studies have shown that parameters of blood glycemic variability calculated from values such as glycated HbA1c and FPG are associated with complications in patients with diabetes. In assessing the risk of related complications in patients with diabetes, it has been found that the higher the index of blood glycemic variability, the higher the risk of complications. At the same time, studies have also shown that controlling blood glycemic variability within a certain range can reduce the occurrence and development of complications in patients with diabetes.

With the widespread use of blood glucose monitoring systems and electronic health records, clinicians and patients with diabetes have gained a better understanding of blood glycemic variability over the course of a day or over longer periods of time. Blood glycemic variability indices can be calculated using different blood glucose monitoring methods. Both long-term and short-term blood glycemic variability indices correlate with the onset and development of diabetes-related complications. However, different blood glycemic variability indices have different clinical significance for different diabetes-related complications. Domestic and foreign researchers are continuously exploring and identifying more quantitative indices representing blood glycemic variability and their correlation with diabetes-related complications. They have confirmed that various quantitative indices evaluating long-term and short-term blood glycemic variability are to some extent correlated with the risk of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases, and microvascular complications in patients with diabetes. To overview the current state of research, we searched PubMed using the terms diabetes, glycemic variability, glucose fluctuation, hyperglycemia, and vascular complications. This review summarizes various quantitative parameters of short-term and long-term blood glycemic variability and their correlation with the occurrence and development of macrovascular and microvascular complications in patients with diabetes. The aim is to improve the implementation of glycemic control in clinical practice and to predict, prevent, delay and reduce the occurrence and development of related complications in patients with diabetes.

Glycemic Variability

Definition of Glycemic Variability

Glycemic variability (GV), also known as blood glucose fluctuations, refers to the dynamic changes in blood glucose levels between low and high levels in the body, which can provide more information about blood glucose changes. It includes short-term blood glycemic variability, such as within-day and between-day variability, as well as long-term blood glycemic variability over weeks, months, or years.12 Most studies use FPG, glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), and other parameters to represent glycemic variability.

Methods for Monitoring Glycemic Variability

Monitoring parameters mainly include amplitude, which reflects the degree of blood glycaemic variability, and frequency, which reflects the variability of blood glucose over time.13 Those measurements can be done using sensors of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG). Studies have shown a good correlation between SMBG and CGM blood glucose levels.14

Parameters of Glycemic Variability

Parameters of the Short-Term Glycemic Variability

Mean of Daily Differences (MDD): The best parameters for assessing intra-day glycemic variability, reflecting the repeatability of daily glucose fluctuations.15 It is calculated by taking the absolute difference between corresponding measurements over 2 consecutive days and calculating the average.13

Average Glucose Profile (AGP): Reflects whether there is daily synchrony in blood glucose patterns within a given time period, usually expressed as the IQR of the AGP.13,16,17

Coefficient of variation (CV): (standard deviation/mean) × 100%, is a parameter independent of the mean13 and reflects only the magnitude of glucose variation.

Standard deviation (SD): The arithmetic square root of the variance, which represents the distribution of blood glucose readings around the mean or variability. SD is strongly influenced by average blood glucose.

Mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE): The average value obtained by taking the first valid direction of fluctuation to calculate the magnitude of the blood glucose fluctuation after removing all fluctuations that do not exceed a certain threshold (usually 1 SD).

Time in Range (TIR): The percentage of time spent in the target glucose range (70–180 mg/dL or 3.9–10.0 mmol/L) within 24 hours.18

Time above range (TAR): The time that glucose is above the target range (181–250 mg/dL or 10.1–13.9 mmol/L).18

Time below range (TBR): The time that glucose is below the target range (<70 mg/dL or 3.8 mmol/L) and (<54 mg/dL or 2.0 mmol/L).

Incremental glucose peak (IGP): Calculated by subtracting the FPG from the absolute glucose peak (AGP).19

Glycemic variability percentage (GVP): GVP = (L/L0-1) × 100%, where L and L0 are the lengths of the true glycemic variability trajectory and the no glycemic variability trajectory, respectively, within a given time period.

Parameters of Long-Term Glycemic Variability

HbA1c, FPG and postprandial plasma glucose (PPG) are mostly used in long-term glucose fluctuation clinics with multiple long-term follow-ups, and the variability is expressed as CV, SD, VIM, etc.

Visit-to-visit variability (VVV): During long-term follow-up, FPG and HbA1c are measured at certain intervals and standardized to obtain the blood glycemic variability of multiple time periods, namely FPG-VVV and HbA1c-VVV.20 SD, CV, VIM, and ARV can all be used as indices of VVV.

Variation Independent of Mean (VIM): Logarithmic curve fit. VIM = SD/meanβ, where β is the regression coefficient based on the ln of the SD over the ln of the mean.21

Average Real Variability (ARV): Refers to the average difference between consecutive values; ARV can roughly estimate the variation of each episode, rather than simply calculating the dispersion of the data.13

HbA1c variability: Reflects long-term blood glucose fluctuations; expressed using CV, SD, VIM, and other parameters to measure its variability.

HbA1c variability score (HVS): Reflects long-term blood glucose fluctuations, and HVS refers to the percentage of HbA1c measurements with a change of at least 0.5% from the previous measurement.13

FPG and PPG variability: Reflects long-term fasting and postmeal glucose fluctuations; expressed using CV, SD, VIM, ARV, and other parameters to measure their variability.13 (Table 1)

Table 1.

Evaluation Parameters for Short-Term and Long-Term Blood Glucose Fluctuations

Parameters of Glycemic Variability Measurement Methods Definition
Parameters of the short-term glycemic variability
MDD SMBG, CGM Calculate the absolute value of the difference obtained by subtracting the corresponding measurements over 2 consecutive days and then calculate the mean value.22
AGP CGM The distribution of glucose data for a given time point is usually expressed in the form of IQR of AGP.16,17,22
CV SMBG, CGM It was used to measure the stability of blood glucose.
SD SMBG, CGM The magnitude of the change in blood glucose compared to the mean blood glucose.
MAGE SMBG, CGM Mean difference between peak and minimum values
TIR SMBG, CGM The percentage of time within the target range of glucose levels, 70–180 mg/dL (3.9–10.0 mmol/L), within a 24-hour period.19
TAR SMBG, CGM 181–250 mg/dL (10.1–13.9mmol/l).19
TBR SMBG, CGM <70 mg/dL (3.8 mmol/l) and <54 mg/dL (2.0mmol/l)
IGP CGM IGP=AGP - FPG.20
GVP SMBG, CGM GVP= (L/L0-1) ×100%
Parameters of the long-term glycemic variability
VVV SMBG, CGM The inter-following variability of FPG and HbA1c is assessed using FPG and HbA1c obtained from measurements over multiple time periods.21 SD, CV, VIM and ARV can all be used as indices of VVV.
VIM SMBG, CGM Calculations based on logarithmic curve fitting. VIM=SD/meanβ
ASV SMBG, CGM Average of the differences between consecutive values.
Variability of HbA1c SMBG, CGM Reflects long-term blood glucose fluctuations and expresses its variability in terms of CV, SD, VIM, etc.
HVS SMBG, CGM The proportion of the number of HbA1c changes ≥0.5% from the previous time in the total number of HbA1c measurements.22
Variability of FPG and PPG SMBG, CGM It was used to estimate the variability of fasting and postprandial glucose over a follow-up period of months or years, the variability is expressed in terms of CV, SD, VIM, ARV, etc.22
Open in a new tab

Abbreviations: AGP, Average glucose profile; ARV, Average real variability; ASV, Average successive variability; CGM, Continuous glucose monitoring; CV, Coefficient of variation; GVP, Glycemic variability percentage; HbA1c, Hemoglobin A1c; HVS, HbA1c variability score; IGP, Incremental glucose peak; MAGE, Mean amplitude of glycemic excursions; MDD, Mean of daily differences; PPG, Postprandial plasma glucose; SD, Standard deviation; SMBG, Self-monitoring of blood glucose; TAR, Time above range; TBR, Time below range; TIR, Time in range; VIM, Variation independent of the mean; VVV, Visit-to-visit variability; IQR, interquartile range.

Glycemic Variability in Diabetes Mellitus and Its Association with Some Complications

Mechanisms Research

Oxidative Stress

Oxidative stress refers to the imbalance between cellular pro-oxidants and antioxidants.23 High glycemic variability can exacerbate oxidative stress and accelerate cell apoptosis and damage.24 High blood glucose, glycemic variability, and hypoglycemia are all associated with the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Hyperglycemia promotes the production of advanced glycation end products (AGEs) by inducing excessive ROS and oxidative stress (OS), activating protein kinase C (PKC), and promoting overactivity of the hexosamine and polyol pathways, leading to the development of insulin resistance, impaired insulin secretion, and endothelial dysfunction. Research suggests that compared with chronic hyperglycemia, GV is associated with increased production of ROS leading to vascular damage, possibly through the same mechanisms as hyperglycemia, but may also have adverse effects associated with hypoglycemia.23,25 Hypoglycemia may also play an important role in promoting diabetic vascular complications through OS, inflammation, thrombotic events, and endothelial dysfunction.23

Activation of Inflammatory Response

Diabetes mellitus is a chronic low-grade inflammatory disease. Activation of the inflammatory pathway is critical for the onset and development of complications in patients with diabetes.25 On one hand, hyperglycemia can activate the immune response within the islets, promoting the synthesis and release of inflammatory factors such as IL-1β, TNF-α, IL-6 and VCAM-1 into the blood, creating a local microenvironment with them. Within this microenvironment, immune cells are activated, initiating an inflammatory response that worsens insulin resistance and further impairs islet function.24,26 On the other hand, blood glucose fluctuations promote the production of inflammatory factors such as IL-6 and TNF-α, exacerbating the occurrence and development of microangiopathy in patients with diabetes.27 At the same time, inflammatory factors associated with blood glucose fluctuations become more active. They not only damage pancreatic β-cells, inducing apoptosis and impairing β-cell function and insulin secretion, but also exacerbate blood glucose fluctuations, creating a vicious cycle.28

Endothelial Cell Damage

Endothelial cell damage is a key indicator of diabetic vascular complications. Fluctuations in blood glucose levels stimulate the production of cytokines, adhesion molecules, and apoptotic genes, leading to endothelial damage in both larger vessels and microvessels, ultimately compromising vasodilator function.29,30 Fluctuating hyperglycemia also increases susceptibility to oxidative stress, which further exacerbates endothelial cell damage and results in impaired vasoconstriction.24

Activation of Coagulation Mechanism

Hypercoagulation is one of the major pathophysiological mechanisms of diabetic vascular complications. Platelet aggregation and activation are closely related to the magnitude of glycemic variability. Increased levels of coagulation factors and thrombin promote thrombus formation and atherosclerosis, increasing the likelihood of acute cardiovascular events.24 Wang et al found that the amplitude of blood glucose fluctuations in T2DM patients was related to the degree of platelet aggregation and activation, and the level of MAGE was significantly positively correlated with the expression levels of peripheral blood PAG and platelet membrane protein CD62p.31

Other Related Mechanisms

Studies have shown that glycemic fluctuations in patients with diabetes have a bidirectional effect on neovascularization. Acute glycemic fluctuations promote vascular formation while inhibiting the production of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). In addition, excessive glycemic fluctuations have been shown to cause more significant renal fibrosis in diabetic nephropathy. Excessive glycemic variability may also cause progressive deterioration of pancreatic β-cell function, thereby exacerbating the onset and development of diabetes and its complications.25 Both short-term and long-term glycemic fluctuations may promote the occurrence of diabetic vascular complications through mechanisms such as oxidative stress, endothelial cell injury, activation of inflammatory responses, and activation of coagulation. Abnormal long-term glycemic fluctuations may increase the risk of hypoglycemia, which stimulates the activation of inflammatory mediators and platelets. Therefore, there may be some differences in the pathophysiological mechanisms between long-term and short-term glycemic fluctuations and diabetic vascular complications. Thus, there may be some correlation between long-term and short-term glycemic fluctuations.

Clinical Research

Impact of the Short-Term Glycemic Variability on the Risks of Macrovascular and Microvascular Complications in Diabetes

Gerbaud et al proposed that during the initial hospitalization period, SD-assessed GV (critical value >2.70 mmol/L) was an independent predictor of macrovascular complications such as acute myocardial infarction, acute heart failure, and cardiogenic death in patients with diabetes and acute coronary syndrome.32 During hospitalization, GV as assessed by MAGE is an independent predictor of poor prognosis in patients with cerebrovascular disease and acute coronary syndrome.33 In addition, MAGE correlates with the severity of coronary artery disease (CAD) in acute myocardial infarction patients with poor diabetes control. Early assessment of GV may help to identify high-risk patients and may serve as a therapeutic target for primary and secondary prevention.34 Daily GV is associated with coronary artery spasm in patients with glycemic disorders.35 During the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), IGP is independently correlated with aortic stiffness and poor carotid artery remodeling, but not with carotid intima-media thickness, stiffness, microvascular function, etc.19 Liang et al pointed out that controlling GV can improve insulin resistance, reduce carotid intima-media thickness, and reduce the risk of CVD.36 In addition, TIR during hospitalization was negatively related with increased risk of all-cause and cardiovascular death.37

A 7-point glucose curve study using the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) dataset confirmed a negative association between TIR and the risk ratio for developing retinopathy or microalbuminuria. A 10% decrease in TIR was associated with a 64% increase in the risk of progression to retinopathy and a 40% increase in the risk of microalbuminuria.38 Picconi et al found that short-term glycemic variability assessed by CV, SD, and MAGE was associated with early retinal neurodegeneration in patients with type 1 diabetes.39 TIR was independently associated with DR at different stages, such as mild-DR, moderate-DR, and vision loss-DR, while the severity of DR was negatively correlated with TIR quartile (r = −0.147; P <0.001).40 In addition, TIR was significantly associated not only with microalbuminuria and DR, but also with CAN. TIR was negatively correlated with all stages of CAN, and was lower in patients with more severe CAN.41 The correlation between TIR and microalbuminuria, DR, and CAN persisted after calibration for parameters of glycemic variability (eg, SD, MAGE, and CV) and baseline factors (eg age, sex, and duration of diabetes). This suggests that the association between TIR and microvascular complications is not influenced by other GV parameters.40–42

Impact of the Long-Term Glycemic Variability on the Risks of Macrovascular and Microvascular Complications in Diabetes

A randomized study in patients with T2DM showed that FPG parameters (FPG-CV, FPG-ARV) were significantly associated with the incidence of cardiovascular disease (CVD). This association remained evident after adjustment for mean fasting plasma glucose and multiple baseline risk factors. However, there was no significant association between HbA1c variability index and CVD.43 Another randomized controlled trial showed that FPG-VVV was related to both macrovascular and microvascular complications (P=0.005 and P<0.001, respectively).20,44 Compared with FPG-CV, HbA1c-CV showed a weaker association and poorer consistency. Lee et al showed that long-term FPG-VIM had a positive dose-response relationship with the risk of stroke, myocardial infarction, and all-cause mortality in patients with diabetes and was independent of glucose-lowering medications, mean fasting glucose, and metabolic risk factors.45 FPG-SD, FPG-CV, and FPG-ARV have similar predictive validity. FPG-CV was identified as a risk factor for ischemic stroke in a Taiwanese population of patients with diabetes.46 A study conducted in a German population showed that HbA1c-CV was a risk factor for stroke, myocardial infarction, and severe hypoglycemia in patients who had just started insulin hypoglycemic therapy.47 Similar results were found in Chinese patients with diabetes, with long-term FPG-CV increasing the risk of CVD and all-cause mortality.48 In addition, studies have found that increases in HbA1c-CV and FPG-CV are both associated with accelerated progression of coronary artery plaques in patients with T2DM.49 Cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy (CAN) is also common in people with diabetes but is one of the most overlooked macrovascular complications. HbA1c-CV and HbA1c-SD independently influence the severity of CAN and are positively correlated with patient scores on the composite autonomic scoring scale.50

HbA1c-CV and HbA1c-SD are both connected with the occurrence of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) in patients with T2DM.51 HbA1c variability may serve as a predictor of HFpEF progression.52 Other studies have suggested that FPG-VVV is a novel risk factor for long-term adverse changes in left heart structure and systolic function in patients with T2DM.53 Yang et al found that FPG variability is an independent predictor of poor left ventricular remodeling after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in patients with T2DM.52 Li et al reported that patients with HVS > 60% had a significantly increased risk of all-cause mortality and adverse cardiovascular events.54

Glycemic variability is a better parameter than average HbA1c for assessing the development or worsening of complications such as diabetic nephropathy and peripheral neuropathy in patients with T2DM during long-term follow-up.55 Several studies have shown that patients with T2DM have an increased risk of developing diabetic polyneuropathy (DPN), painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (PDPN) and peripheral artery disease (PAD), which are significantly associated with FPG-CV.56 FPG-CV is also associated with a higher risk of painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (PDPN) in patients with T2DM.57 In addition, some studies have identified FPG-CV as an effective predictor of diabetic polyneuropathy (DPN) in T2DM patients.58 Risk factors for progression of DN and DR differ, with HbA1c-SD significantly correlating with DN progression and mean HbA1c significantly associated with DR progression.59 HbA1c control can also reduce the risk of patients developing stage 3–4 chronic kidney disease.60 Ceriello et al found that high variability in HbA1c-SD increases the risk of DN.61 Several studies have shown that FPG variability is associated with an increased risk of moderate to severe DN.62 HbA1c-CV is also closely associated with DPN and is considered a predictive parameter for patients with diabetes with DPN.63,64 Lai et al showed that high HbA1c variability is closely associated with the severity of DPN.65 Lee et al demonstrated that high HbA1c-CV is an independent risk factor for renal function decline66 and is also independently associated with the severity of cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy.50 Li et al found that patients with an HbA1c-CV greater than 60% have a significantly increased risk of diabetic retinopathy, peripheral neuropathy, diabetic foot ulcers, and chronic kidney disease.54 In addition, some studies have suggested that HbA1c-CV is a better predictor of microvascular complications than HbA1c-SD and HVS.67 However, there is also evidence that FPG-SD, FPG-CV, HbA1c-SD, and HbA1c-CV are risk predictors for all microvascular and macrovascular complications at 24 months of follow-up, and their predictability is better than that of mean HbA1c.55 Conversely, mean HbA1c was better at predicting the risk of DR and the progression of complications such as peripheral neuropathy in patients with poor glycemic control. Overall, the 24-month glycemic variability parameter was a more favorable predictor than the 12-month glycemic variability parameter.

Discussion

Both long-term and short-term parameters of glycemic variability are associated with a variety of different vascular complications of diabetes, in addition to neurological disorders, cognitive function, even the risk of hypoglycemia, prolonged hospital stay, and postoperative infection.25 However, the correlation between different parameters of long-term or short-term glycemic variability parameters and diabetes-related complications varies. With regard to long-term FPG, FPG-CV, FPG-VIM and other quantitative parameters have certain differences in the correlation with the same long-term complication in patients with diabetes. The same GV quantitative parameters have different predictive effects on the risk of different complications. The same is true for short-term glycemic variability parameters, as shown in Table 2. Besides, both long-term and short-term glucose fluctuations may lead to related complications through oxidative stress, endothelial cell damage, activation of the inflammatory response, activation of coagulation, and other mechanisms. However, long-term glucose fluctuations may increase the risk of hypoglycemia, which stimulates the activation of inflammatory mediators and platelets. This suggests that the pathophysiological mechanisms of long-term and short-term glucose fluctuations leading to diabetes-related complications may be different.22

Table 2.

Correlations Between Glycemic Variability Parameters and Diabetic Complications

Parameters of Glycemic Variability Calculation Method Macrovascular Complications and Mortality Microvascular Complications and Neuropathy
Parameters of the short-term glycemic variability
SD Arithmetic square root of the squared deviation from the mean Acute myocardial infarction, acute heart failure and sudden cardiac death. -
MAGE After removing all blood glucose fluctuations that do not exceed a certain threshold (usually 1 SD), the average is obtained by calculating the amplitude of blood glucose fluctuations according to the direction of the first valid fluctuation Cerebrovascular diseases such as acute coronary syndrome, coronary artery disease, coronary artery spasm. -
IGP IGP=AGP - FPG.20 Aortic stiffness and poor carotid remodelling. -
TIR The percentage of time within the target range of glucose levels, 70–180 mg/dL (3.9–10.0 mmol/L), within a 24-hour period.19 DR, Microalbuminuria and CAN
Parameters of the long-term glycemic variability
FPG-CV (SD/mean) ×100% CVD, ischaemic stroke, accelerated progression of coronary atherosclerosis, poor left heart structure and systolic function, other large vessel lesions and mortality DPN, PDPN, PAD and other microangiopathy
HbA1c-CV (SD/mean) ×100% Coronary atherosclerosis, HFpEF and other large vessel lesions DN, DPN, CAN and all microangiopathy
FPG-ARV The average of the differences between successive measurements over a given time period. CVD -
HbA1c-VVV SD, CV, VIM and ARV can all be used as indices of VVV. Macrovascular disease and mortality -
FPG-VVV SD, CV, VIM and ARV can all be used as indices of VVV. Macrovascular disease and all-cause mortality Microangiopathy
FPG-VIM VIM= SD/meanβ Stroke, myocardial infarction, poor left ventricular reconstruction after infarction and all-cause mortality
FPG-SD Arithmetic square root of the squared deviation from the mean Poor left ventricular reconstruction after infarction and other large vessel lesions All microangiopathy
HbA1c-SD Arithmetic square root of the squared deviation from the mean HFpEF and other large vessel lesions DPN, CAN and all microangiopathy
HVS>60% The proportion of the number of HbA1c changes ≥0.5% from the previous time in the total number of HbA1c measurements.22 All-cause mortality and adverse cardiovascular lesions Diabetic peripheral neuropathy, diabetic foot ulcers and chronic kidney disease
Mean HbA1c Average value - DR in patients with poor glycemic control and peripheral neuropathy
Open in a new tab

Abbreviations: ARV, Average real variability; CAN, Cardiac autonomic neuropathy; CV, Coefficient of variation; CVD, Cardiovascular disease; DN, Diabetic nephropathy; DR, Diabetic retinopathy; DPN, Diabetic polyneuropathy; DR, Diabetic retinopathy; FPG, Fasting plasma glucose; HFpEF, Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; HVS, HbA1c variability score; IGP, Incremental glucose peak; MAGE, Mean amplitude of glycemic excursions; PAD, Peripheral artery disease; PDPN, Painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy; SD, Standard deviation; TIR, Time in range; VIM, Variation independent of the mean; VVV, Visit-to-visit variability.

There may also be some correlation between different quantitative parameters that quantify long-term glucose variability or short-term glucose variability. Nevertheless, few studies have been conducted to explore whether there is a certain correlation between long-term glycemic variability and short-term glycemic variability. Previous studies have investigated the relationship between blood glucose concentration at different times and HbA1c levels. The results showed that premeal glucose was more strongly correlated with HbA1c than postmeal glucose.68 However, Ehehalt et al suggested that postprandial glucose had a higher correlation with HbA1c in patients with better glycemic control, while the correlation between FPG and HbA1c gradually increased with the deterioration of diabetic glycemic control.69 In other words, there may be some correlation between long-term glycemic variability parameters in patients with poor glycemic control. Some studies have confirmed that TIR is negatively correlated with HbA1c and glycated albumin in patients with impaired glucose tolerance, T1DM and T2DM.70 Researchers observed the correlation between HbA1c and several glycemic variability parameters derived from CGMs in T2DM patients and found that HbA1c was correlated with TIR (r= −0.75), mean blood glucose (r=0.8), TAR (r= 0.75), and TBR (r= −0.39).71 There was a negative correlation between TIR and Glucose Management Indicator (GMI) (estimates of mean HbA1c).72 Similar results were observed in elderly male patients with T2DM, and patients with lower TIR had greater long-term glycemic variability.73 In addition to long-term glycemic variability parameters such as HVS, a retrospective study showed that calibrated HbA1c SD was positively correlated with TBR (r=0.501, P=0.009), and mean glucose was positively correlated with TAR (r=0.525, P=0.006) and MODD (r=0.570, P=0.002) in patients with T2DM.74 Some researchers have also found that TIR is associated with mean HbA1c and Hba1C-VVV, while MODD is associated with Hba1C-VVV.75 Consistently, TIR was significantly associated with GMI (r=−0.822, P<0.001) and HbA1c (r=−0.563, P<0.001) in T1DM patients, and TIR had a highly inverse linear relationship with GMI (R2=0.676, P<0.001), while GMI was positively correlated with SD, MAGE, and MODD, but not with CV.76 These results highlight a certain correlation between the quantitative parameters of long-term and short-term glycemic variability in patients with diabetes. The correlation between SMBG glycemic variability parameters and MAGE in CGM is another topic that has attracted much attention from scientists. Studies found that the standard deviation of blood glucose level (SDBG) calculated from the seven-point SMBG data, the postprandial glucose excursion (PPGE), the largest amplitude of glycemic excursions (LAGE), CV, MAGE and other glycemic variability parameters were closely related to MAGE obtained by CGM, especially SDBG.77 Therefore, there is also some correlation between short-term glycemic variability parameters. However, most studies have examined the correlation between HbA1c glycemic variability and short-term glycemic variability parameters during long-term follow-up, and few studies have investigated the correlation between FPG glycemic variability from long-term monitoring and various short-term glycemic variability parameters.

Therefore, we can further explore the correlation between long-term and short-term glycemic variability parameters in patients with diabetes in the future. For example, we can investigate whether there is a correlation between long-term and short-term fasting glycemic variability. What statistical methods can we use to do this research? Can we use Pearson’s correlation coefficient to study the correlation between long-term and short-term blood glucose fluctuations? Or are there other research methods that can be used to study their correlation and the specific nature of their correlation? How effective is this correlation in predicting the risk of complications in patients with diabetes? Is the predictive power of this correlation for the risk of complications in patients with diabetes different if the risk of complications is predicted independently from long-term or short-term glycemic variability? Does this correlation improve the predictive power of glycemic variability on the risk of complications in patients with diabetes? Can we also use a subset of the glucose variability data available to patients with diabetes to predict their risk of relevant complications? After exploring these questions, specific statistical methods may be used to calculate certain glycemic variability indicators in clinical practice to predict and prevent some complications in patients with diabetes. This will help patients with diabetes who do not have access to both long-term and short-term blood glucose monitoring data, and avoid the time-consuming calculation of additional glycemic variability indicators with similar predictive power, and reduce the number of blood samples taken from patients. This will not only improve the efficiency of the management of complication risk, but will also improve patient compliance, thereby benefiting the patients.

Conclusion and Future Prospects

In conclusion, both long-term and short-term glycemic variability parameters may contribute to the development and progression of complications in patients with T2DM by influencing oxidative stress, endothelial cell damage, activation of inflammatory responses, and coagulation activation. In addition, there is some correlation between long-term and short-term glycemic variability parameters, although the pathophysiological mechanisms by which they influence the development of the disease may be different. In future research, it is essential to further investigate the correlation between long-term and short-term glycemic variability parameters, in order to lay a solid foundation for the development of improved strategies for blood glucose monitoring and management.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by Suzhou Science and Technology Project (No: SLT2021006).

Disclosure

The authors declare no conflicts of interest related to this work/review article.

References

  • 1.Papatheodorou K, Papanas N, Banach M, et al. Complications of Diabetes 2016. J Diabetes Res. 2016;2016:6989453. doi: 10.1155/2016/6989453 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Chinese Cardiovascular Disease Prevention Guidelines (2017) Writing group, Editorial Board of Chinese Journal of Cardiovascular Diseases. Chinese Guidelines for Prevention of cardiovascular diseases (2017). Chin J Cardiovasc Dis. 2018;46(1):10–25. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Cavender MA, Steg PG, Smith SC, et al. Impact of diabetes mellitus on hospitalization for heart failure, cardiovascular events, and death. Circulation. 2015;132(10):923–931. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.014796 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Caramori ML, Mauer M. Diabetes and nephropathy. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2003;12(3):273–282. doi: 10.1097/00041552-200305000-00008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kocak MZ, Aktas G, Atak BM, et al. Is Neuregulin-4 a predictive marker of microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes mellitus? Eur J Clin Invest. 2020;50(3):e13206. doi: 10.1111/eci.13206 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Bilgin S, Kurtkulagi O, Tel BMA, et al. Does C-reactive protein to serum Albumin Ratio correlate with diabetic nephropathy in patients with type 2 Diabetes MELLITUS? The Care Time study. Prim Care Diabetes. 2021;15(6):1071–1074. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2021.08.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kocak MZ, Aktas G, Duman TT, et al. Monocyte lymphocyte ratio as a predictor of diabetic kidney injury in type 2 diabetes mellitus; the MADKID study. J Diabetes and Metab Disord. 2020;19(2):997–1002. doi: 10.1007/s40200-020-00595-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Yue S, Zhang J, Wu J, et al. Use of the monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio to predict diabetic retinopathy. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015;12(8):10009–10019. doi: 10.3390/ijerph120810009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Škrah J, Šoupal J, Škrah J, et al. Glucose variability, HbA1c and microvascular complications. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2016;17(1):103–110. doi: 10.1007/s11154-016-9347-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Yapanis M, James S, Craig ME, et al. Complications of diabetes and metrics of glycemic management derived from continuous glucose monitoring. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2022;107(6):e2221–e2236. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgac034 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ceriello A, Novials A, Ortega E, et al. Vitamin C further improves the protective effect of GLP-1 on the ischemia-reperfusion-like effect induced by hyperglycemia post-hypoglycemia in type 1 diabetes. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2013;12(1):97. doi: 10.1186/1475-2840-12-97 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Wang ZF, Zhu MX, Wang ZP. Research progress on the relationship between blood glucose fluctuation and vascular complications in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Adv Cardiol. 2018;39(6):1064–1068. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ni JY, Ma XJ, Zhou J. Research progress of abnormal blood glucose fluctuation and diabetes complications. China Diabetes. 2022;14(4):388–392. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Liu ZG, Yao B, Lin BS, et al. Study on the correlation between blood glucose fluctuation index and average blood glucose fluctuation amplitude in self-blood glucose monitoring. Chin J Diabetes. 2021;13(5):476–481. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Molnar GD, Taylor WF, Ho MM. Day-to-day variation of continuously monitored glycaemia: a further measure of diabetic instability. Diabetologia. 1972;8(5):342–348. doi: 10.1007/BF01218495 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Bailey T, Bode BW, Christiansen MP, et al. The performance and usability of a factory-calibrated flash glucose monitoring system. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2015;17(11):787–794. doi: 10.1089/dia.2014.0378 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Hoss U, Budiman ES. Factory-calibrated continuous glucose sensors: the science behind the technology. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2017;19(S2):S44–S50. doi: 10.1089/dia.2017.0025 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Sun B, Luo Z, Zhou J. Comprehensive elaboration of glycemic variability in diabetic macrovascular and microvascular complications. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2021;20(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12933-020-01200-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Foreman YD, Brouwers MCGJ, Berendschot TTJM, et al. The oral glucose tolerance test-derived incremental glucose peak is associated with greater arterial stiffness and maladaptive arterial remodeling: the Maastricht Study. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2019;18(1):152. doi: 10.1186/s12933-019-0950-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hirakawa Y, Arima H, Zoungas S, et al. Impact of visit-to-visit glycemic variability on the risks of macrovascular and microvascular events and all-cause mortality in type 2 diabetes: the ADVANCE trial. Diabetes Care. 2014;37(8):2359–2365. doi: 10.2337/dc14-0199 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kim JA, Lee JS, Chung HS. Impact of visit-to-visit fasting plasma glucose variability on the development of type 2 diabetes: a nationwide population-based cohort study. Diabetes Care. 2018;41(12):2610–2616. doi: 10.2337/dc18-0802 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.J-Y N, X-J M, Zhou J. Research progress of abnormal blood glucose fluctuation and diabetic complications. Chin J Diabetes. 2022;14(4):388–392. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Papachristoforou E, Lambadiari V, Maratou E, et al. Association of glycemic indices (Hyperglycemia, Glucose Variability, and Hypoglycemia) with oxidative stress and diabetic complications. J Diabetes Res. 2020;2020:7489795. doi: 10.1155/2020/7489795 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Sheng MY. Study on the Correlation Between Blood Glucose Fluctuation and the Degree of Vascular Lesions in Type 2 Diabetes Patients with Normal HbAlc. Soochow University; 2020. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Klimontov VV, Saik OV, Korbut AI. Glucose variability: how does it work? Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(15):7783. doi: 10.3390/ijms22157783 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kahn SE, Cooper ME, Del Prato S. Pathophysiology and treatment of type 2 diabetes: perspectives on the past, present, and future. Lancet. 2014;383(9922):1068–1083. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62154-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Su HW, Kang S, Long YW, et al. Relationship between diabetic nephropathy and blood glucose fluctuation and inflammatory factors. Chi J Geriatric Heart Brain Vessel Dis. 2015;17(3):273–276. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Quan W, Jo E-K, Lee M-S. Role of pancreatic β-cell death and inflammation in diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2013;15(s3):141–151. doi: 10.1111/dom.12153 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Palazzo P, Maggio P, Altavilla R, et al. Cerebral hemodynamics and systemic endothelial function are already impaired in well-controlled type 2 diabetic patients, with short-term disease. PLoS One. 2013;8(12):e83287. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083287 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Ceriello A, Quagliaro L, Piconi L, et al. Effect of postprandial hypertriglyceridemia and hyperglycemia on circulating adhesion molecules and oxidative stress generation and the possible role of simvastatin treatment. Diabetes. 2004;53(3):701–710. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.53.3.701 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Wang JS, Huang Y, Chen KJ, et al. Relationship between blood glucose fluctuation and vascular endothelial injury, platelet activation and PKCβ1 expression in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Chin J Integr Med. 2016;36(10):1184–1190. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Gerbaud E, Darier R, Montaudon M, et al. Glycemic variability is a powerful independent predictive factor of midterm major adverse cardiac events in patients with diabetes with acute coronary syndrome. Diabetes Care. 2019;42(4):674–681. doi: 10.2337/dc18-2047 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Takahashi H, Iwahashi N, Kirigaya J, et al. Glycemic variability determined with a continuous glucose monitoring system can predict prognosis after acute coronary syndrome. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2018;17(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s12933-018-0761-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Benalia M, Zeller M, Mouhat B, et al. Glycaemic variability is associated with severity of coronary artery disease in patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes and acute myocardial infarction. Diabetes Metab. 2019;45(5):446–452. doi: 10.1016/j.diabet.2019.01.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Ito T, Ichihashi T, Fujita H, et al. The impact of intraday glucose variability on coronary artery spasm in patients with dysglycemia. Heart Vessels. 2019;34(8):1250–1257. doi: 10.1007/s00380-019-01353-w [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Liang S, Yin H, Wei C, et al. Glucose variability for cardiovascular risk factors in type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis. J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2017;16(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s40200-017-0323-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Lu J, Wang C, Shen Y, et al. Time in range in relation to all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes: a prospective cohort study. Diabetes Care. 2021;44(2):549–555. doi: 10.2337/dc20-1862 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Beck RW, Bergenstal RM, Riddlesworth TD, et al. Validation of time in range as an outcome measure for diabetes clinical trials. Diabetes Care. 2019;42(3):400–405. doi: 10.2337/dc18-1444 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Picconi F, Parravano M, Ylli D, et al. Retinal neurodegeneration in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus: the role of glycemic variability. Acta Diabetol. 2017;54(5):489–497. doi: 10.1007/s00592-017-0971-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Lu J, Ma X, Zhou J, et al. Association of time in range, as assessed by continuous glucose monitoring, with diabetic retinopathy in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2018;41(11):2370–2376. doi: 10.2337/dc18-1131 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Guo Q, Zang P, Xu S, et al. Time in range, as a novel metric of glycemic control, is reversely associated with presence of diabetic cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy independent of HbA1c in Chinese type 2 diabetes. J Diabetes Res. 2020;2020:5817074. doi: 10.1155/2020/5817074 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Yoo JH, Chol MS, Ahn J, et al. Association between continuous glucose monitoring-derived time in range, other core metrics, and albuminuria in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2020;22(10):768–776. doi: 10.1089/dia.2019.0499 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Zhou JJ, Schwenke DC, Bahn G, et al. Glycemic variation and cardiovascular risk in the veterans affairs diabetes trial. Diabetes Care. 2018;41(10):2187–2194. doi: 10.2337/dc18-0548 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Slieker RC, van der Heijden AAWH, Nijpels G, et al. Visit-to-visit variability of glycemia and vascular complications: the Hoorn Diabetes Care System cohort. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2019;18(1):170. doi: 10.1186/s12933-019-0975-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Lee DY, Han K, Park S, et al. Glucose variability and the risks of stroke, myocardial infarction, and all-cause mortality in individuals with diabetes: retrospective cohort study. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2020;19(1):144. doi: 10.1186/s12933-020-01134-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Lin CC, Yang CP, Li CI, et al. Visit-to-visit variability of fasting plasma glucose as predictor of ischemic stroke: competing risk analysis in a national cohort of Taiwan Diabetes Study. BMC Med. 2014;12(1):165. doi: 10.1186/s12916-014-0165-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Bonke FC, Donnachie E, Schneider A, et al. Association of the average rate of change in HbA1c with severe adverse events: a longitudinal evaluation of audit data from the Bavarian Disease Management Program for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetologia. 2016;59(2):286–293. doi: 10.1007/s00125-015-3797-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Wang A, Liu X, Xu J, et al. Visit‐to‐visit variability of fasting plasma glucose and the risk of cardiovascular disease and all‐cause mortality in the general population. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017;6(12):e006757. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.006757 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Li S, Tang X, Luo Y, et al. Impact of long-term glucose variability on coronary atherosclerosis progression in patients with type 2 diabetes: a 2.3 year follow-up study. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2020;19(1):146. doi: 10.1186/s12933-020-01126-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Lai Y-R, Huang -C-C, Chiu W-C, et al. HbA1C variability is strongly associated with the severity of cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes after longer diabetes duration. Front Neurosci. 2019;13:458. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00458 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Gu J, Fan YQ, Zhang JF, Wang C-Q. Association of hemoglobin A1c variability and the incidence of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and arterial hypertension. Hellenic J Cardiol. 2018;59(2):91–97. doi: 10.1016/j.hjc.2017.08.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Yang CD, Shen Y, Ding FH, et al. Visit-to-visit fasting plasma glucose variability is associated with left ventricular adverse remodeling in diabetic patients with STEMI. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2020;19(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12933-020-01112-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Tang X, Zhong J, Zhang H, et al. Visit-to-visit fasting plasma glucose variability is an important risk factor for long-term changes in left cardiac structure and function in patients with type 2 diabetes. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2019;18(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s12933-019-0854-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Li S, Nemeth I, Donnelly L, et al. Visit-to-visit HbA1c variability is associated with cardiovascular disease and microvascular complications in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2019;43(2):426–432. doi: 10.2337/dc19-0823 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Cardoso CRL, Leite NC, Moram CBM, et al. Long-term visit-to-visit glycemic variability as predictor of micro- and macrovascular complications in patients with type 2 diabetes: the Rio de Janeiro type 2 diabetes cohort study. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2018;17(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12933-018-0677-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Yang CP, Lin CC, Li CI, et al. Fasting plasma glucose variability and HbA1c are associated with peripheral artery disease risk in type 2 diabetes. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2020;19(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12933-019-0978-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Pai YW, Lin CH, Lee IT, et al. Variability of fasting plasma glucose and the risk of painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Metab. 2018;44(2):129–134. doi: 10.1016/j.diabet.2018.01.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Yang CP, Li CI, Liu CS, et al. Variability of fasting plasma glucose increased risks of diabetic polyneuropathy in T2DM. Neurology. 2017;88(10):944–951. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003682 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Song KH, Jeong JS, Kim MK, et al. Discordance in risk factors for the progression of diabetic retinopathy and diabetic nephropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Diabetes Investig. 2019;10(3):745–752. doi: 10.1111/jdi.12953 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Lee MY, Huang JC, Chen SC, et al. Association of HbA1C variability and renal progression in patients with type 2 diabetes with chronic kidney disease stages 3–4. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19(12):4116. doi: 10.3390/ijms19124116 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.De Cosmo S, Viazzi F, Piscitelli P, et al. Blood pressure status and the incidence of diabetic kidney disease in patients with hypertension and type 2 diabetes. J Hypertens. 2016;34(10):2090–2098. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001045 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Zhou JJ, Coleman R, Holman RR, et al. Long-term glucose variability and risk of nephropathy complication in UKPDS, ACCORD and VADT trials. Diabetologia. 2020;63(11):2482–2485. doi: 10.1007/s00125-020-05273-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.da Rosa LCGF, Zajdenverg L, Souto DL, et al. HbA1c variability and long-term glycemic control are linked to diabetic retinopathy and glomerular filtration rate in patients with type 1 diabetes and multiethnic background. J Diabetes Complications. 2019;33(9):610–615. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2019.05.022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Su J, Zhao L, Zhang X, et al. HbA1c variability and diabetic peripheral neuropathy in type 2 diabetic patients. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2018;17(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12933-018-0693-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Lai Y-R, Chiu W-C, Huang -C-C. HbA1C variability is strongly associated with the severity of peripheral neuropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes. Front Neurosci. 2019;13:90. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00090 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Lee CL, Chen CH, Wu MJ, et al. The variability of glycated hemoglobin is associated with renal function decline in patients with type 2 diabetes. Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2020;11:2040622319898370. doi: 10.1177/2040622319898370 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Yang CY, Su PF, Hung JY, et al. Comparative predictive ability of visit-to-visit HbA1c variability measures for microvascular disease risk in type 2 diabetes. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2020;19(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s12933-020-01082-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Borg R, Kuenen JC, Carstensen B, et al. Associations between features of glucose exposure and A1C: the A1C-Derived Average Glucose (ADAG) study. Diabetes. 2010;59(7):1585–1590. doi: 10.2337/db09-1774 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Ehehalt S, Wiegand S, Korner A, et al. Low association between fasting and OGTT stimulated glucose levels with HbA1c in overweight children and adolescents. Pediatr Diabetes. 2017;18(8):734–741. doi: 10.1111/pedi.12461 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Ohigashi M, Osugi K, Kusunoki Y, et al. Association of time in range with hemoglobin A1c, glycated albumin and 1,5‐anhydro‐d‐glucitol. J Diabetes Investig. 2021;12(6):940–949. doi: 10.1111/jdi.13437 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Hirsch IB, Welsh JB, Calhoun P, et al. Associations between HbA 1c and continuous glucose monitoring-derived glycaemic variables. Diabet Med. 2019;36(12):1637–1642. doi: 10.1111/dme.14065 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Lu J, Ma X, Zhang L, et al. Glycemic variability modifies the relationship between time in range and hemoglobin A1c estimated from continuous glucose monitoring: a preliminary study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2020;161:108032. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2020.108032 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Fang FS, Liu XY, Yan ST, et al. Relationship between time in range and long-term glucose variability in elderly male patients with type 2 diabetes. Chin Gen Pract. 2023;26(16):1979–1983. [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Tokutsu A, Okada Y, Torimoto K, et al. Relationship between glycemic intraday variations evaluated in continuous glucose monitoring and HbA1c variability in type 2 diabetes: pilot study. Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2021;13(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s13098-021-00663-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Tsuchiya T, Saisho Y, Murakami R, et al. Relationship between daily and visit-to-visit glycemic variability in patients with type 2 diabetes. Endocr J. 2020;67(8):877–881. doi: 10.1507/endocrj.EJ20-0012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Peng HM, Deng HR, Zhou YW, et al. Effect of glucose variability on the relationship between time in range and blood glucose management in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Chin Med J. 2022;102(16):1190–1195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Liu ZG, Yao B, Lin BS, et al. Study on the correlation between blood glucose excursion index and mean amplitude of glucose excursion in self-monitoring of blood glucose. Chin J Diabetes. 2021;13(5):476–481. [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Journal of General Medicine are provided here courtesy of Dove Press

RESOURCES