Skip to main content
JNET Journal of Neuroendovascular Therapy logoLink to JNET Journal of Neuroendovascular Therapy
. 2020 Mar 11;14(5):177–182. doi: 10.5797/jnet.cr.2019-0108

Reversible Cerebral Vasoconstriction Syndrome in Early Pregnancy Treated with Endovascular Therapy

Satoru Fujiwara 1, Nobuyuki Ohara 1,, Tomoyuki Kono 1, Ryoma Inui 1, Hirotoshi Imamura 2, Michi Kawamoto 1, Nobuyuki Sakai 2, Nobuo Kohara 1
PMCID: PMC10370675  PMID: 37502693

Abstract

Objective

We report a case of reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS) that occurred during early pregnancy and improved by endovascular therapy (EVT).

Case Presentation

A 30-year-old Japanese woman at 8 weeks’ gestation presented with sudden occipital headache followed by left hemiparesis and convulsion. MRI on admission revealed acute infarction in the distribution of the right posterior cerebral artery (PCA), and MRA demonstrated multi-segmental vasoconstrictions in the posterior circulation. Since the episode and image findings were suggestive of RCVS and the patient was in the organogenesis period, intravenous magnesium sulfate was administered as a vasodilator. Her level of consciousness improved temporarily; however, she suddenly fell into a stupor on day 4 of the illness. Emergency MRI demonstrated a fresh infarction in the left side of pons, and the poorer visualization of the posterior circulation. We proposed selective intra-arterial infusion of nicardipine 1 mg over 1 minute through an indwelling microcatheter in the middle of the basilar artery. The left superior cerebellar artery (SCA) and P1 blood flow improved after the procedure. Her symptoms improved gradually, and follow-up MRA performed on day 15 was almost normal. Hence, we established a definite diagnosis of RCVS. She was discharged to recovery phase rehabilitation hospital with modified Rankin Scale 4 and National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) 5.

Conclusion

RCVS can occur in early pregnancy period, and EVT is a potential therapeutic option for RCVS in this condition.

Keywords: reversible vasoconstriction syndrome, early pregnancy, endovascular therapy, intra-arterial infusion of nicardipine

Introduction

Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS) is well recognized as a clinical-radiological entity characterized by thunderclap headache, with or without other acute neurological symptoms, and diffuse segmental constriction of cerebral arteries that resolve spontaneously within 3 months.1) Various related factors with RCVS are reported such as post-partum period, vasoactive drugs, catecholamine-secreting tumors, and other less common clinical conditions.2) However, detailed pathophysiological basis of this condition remains unknown, and therefore, the effective treatment for RCVS has still little evidence. Here, we report a case of RCVS that occurred during an unusual period of early pregnancy treated with endovascular therapy (EVT) (written informed consent was obtained from this patient about this report).

Case Report

A 30-year-old Japanese woman (gravida 2, para 2) in 8 weeks’ third gestation was transferred to our emergency department with sudden onset of left hemiparesis and convulsion after vomiting and headache. She experienced no perinatal complications in the past two pregnancies; however, during the first trimester of both, she had morning sickness and experienced sudden occipital headache continued 1 or 2 minutes every time vomiting. On admission, her blood pressure was normal. Neurological examination showed drowsiness, homonymous hemianopia, left hemiparesis, and unilateral spatial neglect, then National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) was 13. MRI revealed acute infarction in the distribution of right posterior cerebral artery (PCA) including thalamus, and thin cortical subarachnoid hemorrhage around the right occipital lobe. MRA demonstrated multi-segmental vasoconstrictions mainly in the posterior cerebral circulation, with left P1 and right P2-3 segment were poorly depicted in particular (Fig. 1). Since the cerebral infarction also seen in the right thalamus, it was considered that strong contraction occurred not only in the right P2-3 but also in the P1 at the onset. Cerebrospinal fluid examination showed no evidence of inflammatory diseases and laboratory data were normal including C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, D-dimer, fibrinogen, activated partial thromboplastin time, prothrombin time, fibrinogen degradation products, and serum catecholamine or estrogen levels. Autoantibodies such as anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies and anti-cardiolipin antibodies or anti-nuclear antibody were all negative. Since the characteristic episode and image findings were highly suggestive of RCVS, we administered continuous intravenous infusion of magnesium sulfate as vasodilator instead of calcium channel blocker (CCB) and levetiracetam for acute symptomatic seizure. Her disturbance of consciousness once recovered almost completely on day 3 of the illness; however, she acutely fell into stupor again along with pyramidal sign on the right extremities on the following morning. Emergency MRI demonstrated a fresh infarction in the left side of pons, and the poorer visualization of the posterior circulation (Fig. 2). Then, EVT was undertaken for RCVS with medical treatment resistance.

Fig. 1. Magnetic resonance imaging on admission. Diffusion-weighted imaging revealed acute infarction in the distribution of right PCA. MRA demonstrated multi-segmental vasoconstrictions mainly in the posterior circulation, with distal segment of right PCA and left P1 segment was poorly depicted in particular. FLAIR showed thin cortical subarachnoid hemorrhage around right occipital lobe (arrow). FLAIR: fluid-attenuated inversion recovery; PCA: posterior cerebral artery.

Fig. 1

Fig. 2. Imaging findings on the illness day 4. Emergency MRI taken when neurological symptoms worsen demonstrated a fresh infarction in the left side of pons, and the poorer visualization of the diffuse posterior circulation.

Fig. 2

Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) confirmed severe stenosis of the left P1 segment of the PCA and superior cerebellar artery (SCA), whereas the posterior communicating artery supplied to the distribution of the left PCA. Selective intra-arterial infusion of nicardipine 1 mg over 1 minute through a microcatheter (Excelsior SL10 0.038 inch/150 cm, Stryker, Tokyo, Japan) in the middle of the basilar artery improved the blood flow of left SCA and PCA after two cycles of the procedure (Fig. 3). We administered total 5000 units of heparin and 180 mL of iopamidol. Her abdomen was covered with protectors during procedures, and her estimated radiation absorbed dose was a total of 840.6 mGy. Continuous intravenous infusion of nicardipine, regular injection of fasudil, and oral cilostazol and verapamil were administered thereafter, and abortion was done considering the difficulty to overcome her perinatal period with neurological sequelae and the possibility of the relation between pregnancy and RCVS after a careful informed consent with her husband. The operation was completed successfully, then from Day 5 on, her neurological symptoms recovered gradually without recurrence. MRA showed almost normal including posterior circulation on Day 15 (Fig. 4). We established a definite diagnosis of RCVS since there was no proof of differential diagnosis of RCVS, such as primary angiitis of the central nervous system, catecholamine-secreting tumors, and hypercarcemia. We speculated that vomiting caused by morning sickness might have triggered thunderclap headache of RCVS. She was discharged to recovery phase rehabilitation hospital on Day 64, with modified Rankin Scale 4 and NIHSS 5 (Fig. 5).

Fig. 3. (a) DSA findings before and after the procedure. Initial DSA confirmed the severe stenosis of left P1 and superior cerebellar artery. (b) After selective intra-arterial infusion of nicardipine 1 mg through an indwelling microcatheter in basilar artery, the blood flow of left P1 and SCA improved. DSA: digital subtraction angiography; SCA: superior cerebellar artery.

Fig. 3

Fig. 4. Imaging findings on the illness day 15. MRA was almost normal including posterior circulation.

Fig. 4

Fig. 5. Clinical course. ADL: activities of daily life; EVT: endovascular therapy; LEV: levetiracetam.

Fig. 5

Discussion

In this case, we found two important clinical issues, the first is that RCVS can occur in early pregnancy period, and the other is the efficacy of EVT for the organogenesis period patients. It is well known that a variety of clinical conditions caused RCVS, and a recent review described that sympathetic overactivity, endothelial dysfunction or oxidative stress can lead to vasoconstriction.2) Since Valsalva maneuver is a potential cause for sympathetic overactivity, we speculate that repeated Valsalva maneuvers induced by prolonged vomiting might have resulted in cerebral vasoconstriction finally. However, to our knowledge, the similar clinical course of RCVS is not reported in the literature ever.

Second, EVT produced the good response for vasoconstriction. Although several reports have recently addressed the efficacy of EVT such as intra-arterial administration of vasodilators or percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for the treatment of RCVS,3) these procedures for the early pregnant woman were not well documented. Although radiation exposure to the fetus is concern, International Commission of Radiological Protection (ICRP) announced that the fetal radiation risks such as prenatal death, malformation have threshold of 100mGy or high, so abortion should be considered only when the prenatal doses became above 100 mGy.4) According to a recent study using the standard body phantom, when the head was exposed to a maximum radiation dose of approximately 800 mGy, the gonad was exposed to a mean radiation dose of about 0.5 mGy.5) Taken together, therapeutic EVT in brain present no increased risk for fetus, of course we should try to cut down the useless exposure to minimize the risk for cancer that have stochastic effect. Besides, most of the pharmaceutical agents including heparin or iodinate contrast agent and therapeutic devices used in EVT can be utilized in pregnant patients.6) As for vasodilator, CCBs such as nimodipine3) and verapamil,7) or milrinone (phosphodiesterase inhibitor)8) have been reported as effective vasodilators for RCVS. In this case, we administered nicardipine, which is a CCB approved and used as an intravenous formulation in Japan, after comprehensively evaluating safety for this patient. As such, it is our belief that EVT should be known as a therapeutic option for progressive RCVS, and pregnancy is not sufficient reason for hesitating the operation in terms of radiation exposure for fetus.

This report has an important limitation. During acute exacerbation phase of RCVS, medical treatments such as abortion and administration of many drugs were performed in addition to EVT; therefore, it is difficult to prove the therapeutic effect of endovascular treatment alone.

Conclusion

RCVS can occur in early pregnancy period, and EVT is a potential therapeutic option.

Disclosure Statement

Nobuyuki Sakai received lecture fees from Stryker Japan K.K. and Biomedical Solutions, Inc.; Nobuyuki Sakai received a research grant from TERUMO Corporation; Nobuyuki Sakai received consigned research fund from DAIICHI SANKYO COMPANY, LIMITED, TERUMO Corporation, and JIMRO Co., Ltd. The remaining authors have no conflict of interest related to this work.

References

  • 1).Ducros A: Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome. Lancet Neurol 2012; 11: 906–917. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2).Ducros A, Wolff V: The typical thunderclap headache of reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome and its various triggers. Headache 2016; 56: 657–673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3).Ioannidis I, Nasis N, Agianniotaki A, et al. : Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome: treatment with multiple sessions of intra-arterial nimodipine and angioplasty. Interv Neuroradiol 2012; 18: 297–302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4).The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection . ICRP publication 103. Ann ICRP 2007; 37: 1–332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5).Tanaka T, Sadatoh A, Hayakawa M, et al. : Endovascular treatment of stroke during pregnancy: Measuring the radiation exposure dose of lower abdomen using the human body phantom. JNET J Neuroendovasc Ther 2013; 7: 243–251. [Google Scholar]
  • 6).Ishii A, Miyamoto S: Endovascular treatment in pregnancy. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2013; 53: 541–548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7).Farid H, Tatum JK, Wong C, et al. : Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome: treatment with combined intra-arterial verapamil infusion and intracranial angioplasty. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011; 32: E184–E187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8).Bouchard M, Verreault S, Gariépy JL, et al. : Intra-arterial milrinone for reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome. Headache 2009; 49: 142–145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Neuroendovascular Therapy are provided here courtesy of The Japanese Society for Neuroendovascular Therapy

RESOURCES