Purpose of review
Chronic pain is poorly treated with many developing disabling comorbidities such as anxiety, depression and insomnia. Considerable evidence supports the idea that pain and anxiodepressive disorders share a common neurobiology and can mutually reinforce, which has significant long-term implications as the development of comorbidities leads to poorer treatment outcomes for both pain and mood disorders. This article will review recent advances in the understanding of the circuit basis for comorbidities in chronic pain.
Recent findings
A growing number of studies have aimed to determine the mechanisms underlying chronic pain and comorbid mood disorders by using modern viral tracing tools for precise circuit manipulation with optogenetics and chemogenetics. These have revealed critical ascending and descending circuits, which advance the understanding of the interconnected pathways that modulate the sensory dimension of pain and the long-term emotional consequences of chronic pain.
Summary
Comorbid pain and mood disorders can produce circuit-specific maladaptive plasticity; however, several translational issues require addressing to maximise future therapeutic potential. These include the validity of preclinical models, the translatability of endpoints and expanding analysis to the molecular and system levels.
Keywords: chronic pain, comorbid mood disorders, neural circuits
INTRODUCTION
Effective treatment of chronic pain is a major unmet clinical challenge, leading to long-term disability and substantial socioeconomic loss. Although estimates vary, the prevalence of chronic pain amongst the adult population in Europe and the USA is thought to be 19% 1,2▪▪, over half of whom have suffered for more than 2 years, and 40% of whom report inadequate pain relief from currently available analgesics 1. The prevalence of mild-to-severe depression more than doubles in those living with chronic pain (8.7–22.3%, respectively) compared with those without (1.2–8.8%) 2▪▪, and these figures may rise considerably in fibromyalgia 3. Long before the formal prescribing of antidepressant treatments for chronic pain, the concept of a link between anxiodepressive disorders and chronic pain was obvious, and the possibility of a common neurobiology encouraged the use of antidepressants for those that experienced both pain and depression. The logic was that improving mood and wellbeing would lessen the burden of persistent pain. It is now understood that pain relief from antidepressants can be independent of any actions on mood 4. Moreover, it is recognised that chronic pain and comorbidities can mutually reinforce, and the combination can be more disabling than either condition alone, leading to poorer treatment outcomes for pain and depression 5. Understanding their reciprocal interaction at a circuitry level is a vital first step towards optimal therapeutic targeting.
KEY POINTS.
Chronic pain is frequently associated with mood disorders which can mutually reinforce.
The presence of co-morbidities can lead to poorer treatment outcomes.
Adaptations within discrete circuits underlie changes in sensory and affective processing in chronic pain states.
ASSESSING THE EMOTIONAL AND COGNITIVE CONSEQUENCES OF CHRONIC PAIN IN PRECLINICAL MODELS
The translatability of preclinical pain and mental health research has been a contentious issue for a number of years now. Many of the emotional consequences of chronic pain can be modelled in rodents, which tend to emerge after 4 weeks postinjury, but to identify the circuit basis for these comorbidities, valid measures are required. Clearly, the full spectrum of symptoms experienced during depression cannot be replicated in rodents, and more appropriate terminology is required to describe animal behaviour; however, more recently, many behavioural assays have been refined to assess affective state-related behaviour in a manner that may better relate to particular aspects of anxiodepressive disorders. As a prey species, studying anxiety-like behaviours in rodents is still heavily reliant on their hesitance to explore novel, brightly lit, or open environments. Advances in home cage monitoring allow for studying open-field behaviour, where animals can be studied during their active phase without additional confounding stressors such as unfamiliar environments and the presence of the experimenter 6. Other ethological endpoints include social interactions and nesting but also motivation to perform homoeostatic behaviours such as feeding and grooming 7. The sucrose preference test is most frequently used to assess anhedonia, but the reward learning assay permits more nuanced study of reward sensitivity, and an analogous human test also exists 8. Cognitive impairments, including attention, executive functioning and working memory, are commonplace in chronic pain and major depressive disorder 9; these are frequently studied preclinically using assays, including novel object recognition and operant learning. Ideally, studies should utilise a range of tests to link precise circuit function to diverse behaviours.
NEURAL CIRCUITS FOR PAIN AND AFFECTIVE PROCESSING
Lateral habenula
Considering its role in regulating negatively motivated behaviour, the lateral habenula, located in the epithalamus, has attracted much attention as a pharmacotherapeutic target for mood disorders over the last decade. Afferent projections arise from diverse limbic structures and the basal ganglia, and through direct and indirect innervations, the lateral habenula can engage serotonergic, noradrenergic and dopaminergic systems. For these reasons, this nucleus is uniquely placed to act as an integrative hub for value-based, sensory and experience-dependent information, capable of controlling a wide range of motivational, behavioural and cognitive processes 10. As part of its function in encoding aversive states, the lateral habenula afferent and efferent pathways are implicated in pain and analgesia. Single unit recordings in rats revealed neuronal populations excited or inhibited by noxious somatosensory stimulation 11, and nerve injury resulted in higher levels of spontaneous or burst firing 12,13. Electrical stimulation of the lateral habenula produced an analgesic effect during acute inflammation 14.
An elegant study by Zhou et al. 15 described a trisynaptic circuit that mediated anxiety-like behaviours in a chronic pain state. Using viral tracing methods, this revealed a subpopulation of serotonergic dorsal raphe neurones projecting to somatostatin positive neurones in the central amygdala (CeASom). Reduced serotonergic drive decreased the excitability of CeASom neurones in a 5-HT1AR-dependent manner. Optogenetically activating this pathway reversed anhedonia and learned helplessness behaviours after nerve injury. These excitatory CeASom neurones were subsequently shown to project to and excite glutamatergic neurones in the lateral habenula, which were hyperexcitable after nerve injury, and optogenetically inhibiting this pathway attenuated the same behaviours. Most CeA neurones are GABAergic, and inhibitory CeASom and CeAPKCδ neurones represent two largely nonoverlapping populations with opposing antinociceptive and pronociceptive functions, respectively 16 suggesting that within the CeA discrete circuits drive sensory and affective adaptations in chronic pain states. This is also evident within the lateral habenula. The NK3R was found to be downregulated in the lateral habenula following trigeminal nerve ligation. Unilateral (ipsilateral to the injury) chemogenetic inhibition of, or NK3R overexpression in, excitatory lateral habenula neurones reversed anxiety-like behaviour but not mechanical hypersensitivity following nerve injury, whereas bilateral silencing reversed both behaviours 12. Furthermore, optogenetically activating an excitatory neurokinin positive projection from the periaqueductal grey to the lateral habenula reduced the frequency of excitatory postsynaptic currents in habenula neurones, and chemogenetic silencing this pathway prevented the antinociceptive and anxiolytic effect of NK3R overexpression in the lateral habenula 17.
The lateral habenula may also be a key locus for opioid analgesia. In naive animals, activation of μ-opioid receptors decreased neuronal activity in the lateral habenula via postsynaptic hyperpolarisation and presynaptic inhibition of glutamate release 18. Microinjection of μ-opioid receptor agonists herein increased paw withdrawal thresholds after nerve injury and produced conditioned place preference, an indirect readout of a positive affective state 19. As the former represents a spinally mediated sensorimotor response, it would suggest that the actions of opioid receptor agonists within the lateral habenula are at least partly through subsequent engagement of the descending pain modulatory system. Within the ascending circuits, optogenetically activating a lateral preoptic hypothalamic to habenula projection produced place aversion that was reversed by μ-opioid receptor activation in the lateral habenula 19.
Locus coeruleus
Historically, the locus coeruleus was considered homogenous both anatomically and functionally. The advent of modern tracing techniques has challenged this view, proposing a modular organisation of the locus coeruleus, which forms functionally segregated domains with respect to their efferent projections. Retrograde labelling from the spinal cord revealed a population of neurones located within the ventral aspect of the locus coeruleus and chemogenetic activation of this module supressed spinal neuronal excitability 20. After a nerve injury, an asymmetry developed in mediating descending pain modulation and affective behaviours. Within the ipsilateral descending pathway, in the early response to nerve injury, descending inhibitory function increased before extinction. In the later stages, where the emotional consequences of persistent pain become more evident, silencing either the ipsilateral or contralateral nucleus reversed learned helplessness behaviours 21▪▪. Dependent on the precise aetiology and time-dependent plasticity, the locus coeruleus can switch from ‘pain inhibitor’ to ‘pain generator’. Within the descending pathways, chemogenetic silencing of a locus coeruleus to dorsal reticular nucleus projection was antinociceptive in a model of neuropathic pain 22 mediated via α1-adrenoreptors in the dorsal reticular nucleus 23. As further evidence for the existence of parallel and functionally discrete noradrenergic pathways, optogenetic activation of the coeruleospinal module abolished the expression of diffuse noxious inhibitory controls (DNIC) 24. DNIC represent a unique form of endogenous modulation recruited by two spatially distinct heterosegmental noxious stimuli and are considered to underpin conditioned pain modulation. It is known that DNIC are subserved by noradrenergic signalling 25, but these inhibitory controls are expressed via the A5 nucleus as the final brainstem relay 26▪. Although both DNIC and the locus coeruleus are historically viewed as exerting inhibitory control over the spinal cord, this interaction implies that hyperactivity within the locus coeruleus could indirectly abolish the expression of parallel inhibitory pathways.
A growing body of evidence supports a functional dichotomy between the ascending and descending locus coeruleus modules. Neurones within the locus coeruleus with ascending projections reside in the dorsal aspect of the nucleus and are largely nonoverlapping with the coeruleospinal module. Chemogenetic activation of the locus coeruleus to prelimbic cortex pathway was aversive and anxiogenic in neuropathic rats but had no effect on nociceptive thresholds 20. Within the reciprocal pathway, the prelimbic to locus coeruleus projection underlies sex differences in cognitive deficits during inflammatory pain 27. Alongside the prelimbic cortex, the anterior cingulate cortex is associated with signalling the aversive dimension of pain but also more generally negative emotional experiences. Bilateral chemogenetic silencing of the locus coeruleus to anterior cingulate cortex projection had no effect on nociceptive thresholds in neuropathic rats but reversed despair-like behaviour 21▪▪. In addition to these direct cortical projections, engagement of limbic circuitry can also determine affective behaviours. In the absence of injury or an external stressor, optogenetic, or chemogenetic stimulation of the locus coeruleus to the basolateral amygdala pathway increased basal neuronal activity in the amygdala and produced conditioned place aversion and anxiety-like behaviours in a β-adrenoceptor dependent manner 28,29. Conversely, after nerve injury, silencing this pathway reversed open-field avoidance and conditioned fear learning without affecting nociceptive thresholds 28. Collectively, these data support the that modulation of nociceptive, cognitive and anxiogenic behaviours are separable functions within the locus coeruleus.
Lateral hypothalamus
The lateral hypothalamus is functionally and molecularly diverse, with a critical role in coordinating diverse physiological and behavioural functions including arousal, sleep-wake states, feeding and stress 30. Both the lateral septum and bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BNST) act as relays to integrate contextual inputs and can engage discrete circuits within the lateral hypothalamus. The lateral septum integrates cortical information about the social environment and prior experiences into downstream executive regions 31. The BNST is implicated in mediating overlapping behaviours including social attachment, offspring bonding, stress and sustained fear states 32. In a model of inflammation with comorbid anxiety and chronic stress with comorbid mechanical hypersensitivity, neuronal activity in the lateral septum was increased compared with naive mice when animals were exploring open arm areas versus the closed arms areas in the plus maze test 33▪. A reduction in nociceptive withdrawal threshold and anxiety-like behaviours could be reproduced in naive mice through optogenetic activation of these GABAergic lateral septum neurones. Conversely, optogenetic or chemogenetic silencing of these neurones produced resilience to pain and anxiety in both models. Viral circuit tracing revealed lateral septum GABAergic neurones project to multiple downstream targets, including the nucleus accumbens, ventral tegmental area, periaqueductal grey, hippocampus and throughout the hypothalamus; these were largely nonoverlapping populations. In particular, activation of the lateral septum to lateral hypothalamus pathway was pronociceptive and anxiogenic in naive mice, and inflammation or chronic stress increased inhibitory synaptic input to the lateral hypothalamus from the lateral septum. Together, these results identified a convergent circuit for the interaction of comorbid pain and anxiety; however, parallel circuits may exist within the lateral hypothalamus with segregated functions. Likewise, neurones within the BNST are also largely GABAergic and provide inhibitory input to the lateral hypothalamus, but this circuit selectively regulated anxiety-like behaviours but not nociceptive thresholds 34. Chemogenetic silencing of the BNST to lateral hypothalamus pathway promoted anxiety-like behaviours in the open field, plus maze and light-dark tests in naive mice, and activating this circuit reversed chronic pain-induced anxiety. These effects were attributed to CART-positive interneurones, which mediate local inhibitory modulation within the BNST. Chronic pain led to intrinsic changes in the excitability of these interneurones, which in turn provided increased inhibitory inputs to lateral hypothalamus-projecting BNST neurones.
Thalamocortical
In their study, Zhu et al. 35▪ studied two thalamocortical pathways and their role in mediating nociceptive hypersensitivity resulting from either nerve injury or chronic stress. The posterior thalamus and parafascicular nucleus relay sensory information to the cortex either via the spinothalamic tract or thalamo-thalamic signalling. After nerve injury or inflammation, posterior thalamic neurones, but not parafascicular neurones, were hyperexcitable to low-intensity mechanical stimuli. However, in a model of chronic stress, parafascicular neurones, but not posterior thalamic neurones, exhibited reduced excitability as shown previously to result from inhibition from the central nucleus of the amygdala 36. Precise chemogenetic silencing of the glutamatergic posterior nucleus to S1 pathway alleviated nerve injury-induced mechanical hypersensitivity. In the parafascicular to anterior cingulate cortex pathway, reduced feed-forward inhibition resulted in cortical neuronal hyperexcitability, which was reversed by chemogenetic activation of this circuit, as were mechanical hypersensitivity and anxiety-like behaviours 35▪. Nociceptive hypersensitivity as a result of either tissue injury or chronic stress produced circuit-specific maladaptation and may indicate how anxiety leads to increased pain sensitivity in chronic pain states.
CONCLUSION
Perceived pain intensity is not always proportional to the extent of tissue or nerve damage but depends on a complex combination of physiological, cognitive, emotional and sociocultural factors and can be strongly influenced by comorbidities such as stress, anxiety, depression and sleep disturbances. The last 2 decades have delivered major advances in our understanding of the neurobiology of somatosensation within peripheral and spinal circuits, but the brain circuits that sustain chronic pain remain a more open question. When treating chronic pain, the goal of effective treatment is to improve quality of life while also achieving pain relief. When developing treatment algorithms, both sensory and affective factors should be taken into consideration as these may affect treatment choice and outcomes. Identifying the circuit basis for pain and its comorbidities represents the first step in identifying novel targets. Expanding analysis into the systems and transcriptional levels and refining preclinical models and endpoints will be central to maximising therapeutic potential.
Box 1. Key points
Chronic pain is frequently associated with mood disorders, which can mutually reinforce each other.
The presence of comorbidities can lead to poorer treatment outcomes.
Adaptations within discrete circuits underlie changes in sensory and affective processing in chronic pain states.
Acknowledgements
None.
Financial support and sponsorship
Ryan Patel is supported by the Professor Anthony Mellows/King’s Prize Fellowship.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
REFERENCES AND RECOMMENDED READING
- Papers of particular interest, published within the annual period of review, have been highlighted as:
- ▪ of special interest.
- ▪▪ of outstanding interest.
- 1.Breivik H, Collett B, Ventafridda V, et al. Survey of chronic pain in Europe: prevalence, impact on daily life, and treatment. Eur J Pain 2006; 10:287–333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2▪▪.Mullins PM, Yong RJ, Bhattacharyya N. Associations between chronic pain, anxiety, and depression among adults in the United States. Pain Pract 2023. doi: 10.1111/papr.13220. [Online ahead of print]. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; This large scale epidemiological survey shows the prevalence of chronic pain and mood disorders in society and highlights the impact of chronic pain on psychological well-being within the general population.
- 3.Fietta P, Fietta P, Manganelli P. Fibromyalgia and psychiatric disorders. Acta Biomed 2007; 78:88–95. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Max MB, Culnane M, Schafer SC, et al. Amitriptyline relieves diabetic neuropathy pain in patients with normal or depressed mood. Neurology 1987; 37:589–596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Bair MJ, Robinson RL, Katon W, et al. Depression and pain comorbidity: a literature review. Arch Intern Med 2003; 163:2433–2445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Grieco F, Bernstein BJ, Biemans B, et al. Measuring behavior in the home cage: study design, applications, challenges, and perspectives. Front Behav Neurosci 2021; 15:735387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Tappe-Theodor A, King T, Morgan MM. Pros and cons of clinically relevant methods to assess pain in rodents. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2019; 100:335–343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Phelps CE, Lumb BM, Donaldson LF, et al. The partial saphenous nerve injury model of pain impairs reward-related learning but not reward sensitivity or motivation. Pain 2021; 162:956–966. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Moriarty O, McGuire BE, Finn DP. The effect of pain on cognitive function: a review of clinical and preclinical research. Prog Neurobiol 2011; 93:385–404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Hu H, Cui Y, Yang Y. Circuits and functions of the lateral habenula in health and in disease. Nat Rev Neurosci 2020; 21:277–295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Congiu M, Trusel M, Pistis M, et al. Opposite responses to aversive stimuli in lateral habenula neurons. Eur J Neurosci 2019; 50:2921–2930. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Cui WQ, Zhang WW, Chen T, et al. Tacr3 in the lateral habenula differentially regulates orofacial allodynia and anxiety-like behaviors in a mouse model of trigeminal neuralgia. Acta Neuropathol Commun 2020; 8:44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Du Y, Wu Y-X, Guo F, et al. Lateral habenula serves as a potential therapeutic target for neuropathic pain. Neurosci Bull 2021; 37:1339–1344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Cohen SR, Melzack R. Habenular stimulation produces analgesia in the formalin test. Neurosci Lett 1986; 70:165–169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Zhou W, Jin Y, Meng Q, et al. A neural circuit for comorbid depressive symptoms in chronic pain. Nat Neurosci 2019; 22:1649–1658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Wilson TD, Valdivia S, Khan A, et al. Dual and opposing functions of the central amygdala in the modulation of pain. Cell Rep 2019; 29:332–46.e5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Zhang W-W, Chen T, Li S-Y, et al. Tachykinin receptor 3 in the lateral habenula alleviates pain and anxiety comorbidity in mice. Front Immunol 2023; 14:1049739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Margolis EB, Fields HL. Mu opioid receptor actions in the lateral habenula. PLoS ONE 2016; 11:e0159097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Waung MW, Maanum KA, Cirino TJ, et al. A diencephalic circuit in rats for opioid analgesia but not positive reinforcement. Nat Commun 2022; 13:764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Hirschberg S, Li Y, Randall A, et al. Functional dichotomy in spinal- vs prefrontal-projecting locus coeruleus modules splits descending noradrenergic analgesia from ascending aversion and anxiety in rats. eLife 2017; 6:e29808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21▪▪.Llorca-Torralba M, Camarena-Delgado C, Suárez-Pereira I, et al. Pain and depression comorbidity causes asymmetric plasticity in the locus coeruleus neurons. Brain 2021; 145:154–167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; This study emphasises the importance of considering laterality when studying neural circuits. Crucially it revealed bilateral involvement in driving anxiogenic behaviours but unilateral involvement for pain modulation.
- 22.Camarena-Delgado C, Llorca-Torralba M, Suárez-Pereira I, et al. Nerve injury induces transient locus coeruleus activation over time: role of the locus coeruleus-dorsal reticular nucleus pathway. Pain 2022; 163:943–954. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Martins I, Carvalho P, de Vries MG, et al. Increased noradrenergic neurotransmission to a pain facilitatory area of the brain is implicated in facilitation of chronic pain. Anesthesiology 2015; 123:642–653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kucharczyk MW, Di Domenico F, Bannister K. Distinct brainstem to spinal cord noradrenergic pathways inversely regulate spinal neuronal activity. Brain 2022; 145:2293–2300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Bannister K, Patel R, Goncalves L, et al. Diffuse noxious inhibitory controls and nerve injury: restoring an imbalance between descending monoamine inhibitions and facilitations. Pain 2015; 156:1803–1811. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26▪.Kucharczyk MW, Di Domenico F, Bannister K. A critical brainstem relay for mediation of diffuse noxious inhibitory controls. Brain 2023. doi: 10.1093/brain/awad002. [Online ahead of print]. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; This study highlights the functional diversity of descending pain modulatory pathways and their role in pain chronicity.
- 27.Cardenas A, Papadogiannis A, Dimitrov E. The role of medial prefrontal cortex projections to locus ceruleus in mediating the sex differences in behavior in mice with inflammatory pain. FASEB J 2021; 35:e21747. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Llorca-Torralba M, Suárez-Pereira I, Bravo L, et al. Chemogenetic silencing of the locus coeruleus-basolateral amygdala pathway abolishes pain-induced anxiety and enhanced aversive learning in rats. Biol Psychiatry 2019; 85:1021–1035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.McCall JG, Siuda ER, Bhatti DL, et al. Locus coeruleus to basolateral amygdala noradrenergic projections promote anxiety-like behavior. eLife 2017; 6:e18247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Mickelsen LE, Bolisetty M, Chimileski BR, et al. Single-cell transcriptomic analysis of the lateral hypothalamic area reveals molecularly distinct populations of inhibitory and excitatory neurons. Nat Neurosci 2019; 22:642–656. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Menon R, Süß T, Oliveira VEd M, et al. Neurobiology of the lateral septum: regulation of social behavior. Trends Neurosci 2022; 45:27–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Lebow MA, Chen A. Overshadowed by the amygdala: the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis emerges as key to psychiatric disorders. Mol Psychiatry 2016; 21:450–463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33▪.Wang D, Pan X, Zhou Y, et al. Lateral septum-lateral hypothalamus circuit dysfunction in comorbid pain and anxiety. Mol Psychiatry 2023; 28:1090–1100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; This study identified a convergent circuit for the interaction of pain and anxiety.
- 34.Yamauchi N, Sato K, Sato K, et al. Chronic pain-induced neuronal plasticity in the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis causes maladaptive anxiety. Sci Adv 2022; 8:eabj5586. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35▪.Zhu X, Tang H-D, Dong W-Y, et al. Distinct thalamocortical circuits underlie allodynia induced by tissue injury and by depression-like states. Nat Neurosci 2021; 24:542–553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; This study showed circuit specific adaptations and distinct mechanisms driving pain hypersensitivity in models of chronic pain and chronic stress.
- 36.Zhu X, Zhou W, Jin Y, et al. A central amygdala input to the parafascicular nucleus controls comorbid pain in depression. Cell Rep 2019; 29:3847–58.e5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]