Skip to main content
NCBI home page
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Jul 26.
Published in final edited form as: J Aging Soc Policy. 2018 May 8;30(3-4):300–315. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2018.1462678

The Trump Administration’s assault on health and social programs: potential consequences for older Hispanics

Jacqueline L Angel a, Nancy Berlinger b
PMCID: PMC10371221  NIHMSID: NIHMS1913934  PMID: 29634422

Abstract

Health and social welfare policy proposals put forth by the Trump administration and Republican-controlled Congress could have huge impacts on low-income groups. This paper focuses on older Hispanics, with an emphasis on the Mexican-origin population who form the largest Hispanic subgroup. A demographic portrait is presented that indicates that Mexican-origin individuals have less wealth and lower incomes than do non-Hispanic Whites. Given rising health care costs, lower use of nursing homes, and greater propensity to live with grown children, prevailing economic disadvantage has serious consequences for this population. More restrictive immigration policies aimed at limiting family reunification could have intergenerational caregiving consequences. In addition, because of labor-force disadvantages, low-income Mexican-origin adults are less likely to have private insurance compared to non-Hispanic Whites as they approach retirement. Consequently, Mexican-origin older adults tend to rely on Medicaid when eligible; in contrast, late-life migrants—who do not qualify for federally funded benefits for at least five years—and unauthorized migrants—who are excluded from federally funded benefits—have extremely limited access to safety net provisions. The potential effects of proposed cutbacks in health care financing on older Hispanics are discussed.

Keywords: Mexican Americans, Hispanics, immigration, Medicaid, health disparities

Introduction

One out of every six residents of the United States is Hispanic, an administrative category that includes people of Mexican, Puerto Rican, Cuban, Central American, and South American nationalities (U.S. Census Bureau, 2011). The Hispanic population, the largest minority population in the United States, has unique needs that raise important policy considerations (U.S. Census Bureau, 2017a). This population could be seriously affected by potential changes in policies related to various aspects of the welfare state, including immigration and health care. During a period characterized by anti-immigrant sentiment throughout the world, this topic raises important ethical and practical considerations. In this essay, we examine sources of vulnerability for the Hispanic population and how proposed Trump administration policy changes could affect it, focusing on immigrants of Mexican origin.

Over the next decade, Hispanics are projected to replace African Americans as the largest group of minority American adults aged 65 years or older. Since the 1970s, the U.S. Hispanic population has grown from 9.6 million to almost 58 million in 2016, today comprising 18% of the total population (Pew Research Center, 2014). By 2060, nearly one in three (28.6%) people in the United States will be Hispanic; the Hispanic population will have increased to a projected 119 million (U.S. Census Bureau, 2015).

While Hispanics are a relatively young population, the number of older Hispanic adults in the United States could increase fourfold to more than 15 million by 2050, due to the aging of this long-settled population (Ortman, Velkoff, & Hogan, 2014). Such growth has implications for aging and immigration policy as well as the use of health care and social care systems, especially at the state level (Gassoumis, Wilber, Baker, & Torres-Gil, 2009). Proposed budget cuts at the federal level could jeopardize the health and social safety nets that this low-wage population relies on in California, Texas, and Florida—three states that account for more than half (55%) of the nation’s Hispanic population (U.S. Census Bureau, 2017b).

The Hispanic population is not monolithic: Those with roots in the Caribbean have had experiences with migration and integration that are different from those who emigrated from Mexico or Central America or from Hispanics who have lived for generations in the southwestern United States, once part of Mexico. These differences have shaped each group’s relationship to the United States. For example, Puerto Ricans are U.S. citizens by birthright, although the aftermath of Hurricane Maria in September 2017 revealed some of the past and present challenges associated with the postcolonial relationship between island and mainland. From 1995 to January 2017, the so-called “Wet Foot-Dry Foot” policy granted Cuban immigrants who arrived in the United States by land expedited access to permanent legal residency (Office of the White House, 2017). Throughout history, Mexican immigrants have typically migrated to the United States for economic reasons, both as temporary laborers in agriculture and other industries and as a settled immigrant population. Mexican migration to the United States has slowed considerably in recent years, however, due to the lingering consequences of the 2008 economic crisis and immigration crackdowns under the current administration (Krogstad, 2016).

Mexican-origin Hispanics (including both immigrants and native-born Hispanics) make up the majority of Hispanics in the United States: approximately two-thirds (63.4%) of all Hispanics in 2015 (Stepler & Brown, 2016). As such, statistics on the Hispanic population largely reflect the Mexican-origin experience. Although Census Bureau data estimate that 43.8% of Hispanic adults in the United States are foreign-born, approximately 11.6 million, or about 35% of Mexican-origin Hispanics are foreign-born (U.S. Census Bureau, 2016). The question of the proportion that is undocumented is less clear: According to estimates from the 2016 American Community Survey, approximately 50% of the 11 million unauthorized (undocumented) immigrants living in the United States in 2016 were born in Mexico (Passel & Cohn, 2017), but a more recent analysis suggests that Mexicans may no longer form a majority of the unauthorized immigrant population (Gonzalez-Barrera, 2017). Most Mexican-origin unauthorized immigrants have lived in the United States for at least 10 years (U.S. Census Bureau, 2016).

Health risk factors among Mexican immigrants

Table 1, which presents selected characteristics of U.S. born and foreign-born Mexican-origin Hispanics, shows that the Mexican-origin population regardless of nativity is largely young and working-age. Compared with the U.S.-born individuals, the foreign-born have low socioeconomic status and more than half do not have a high school education. Due to the group’s low levels of education, Mexican-origin immigrants are seriously underrepresented in the professions. Moreover, Mexican-origin individuals have historically suffered serious disadvantages in the labor market, especially if undocumented. Almost one out of five foreign-born Mexican-origin residents lives in poverty (U.S. Census Bureau, 2016).

Table 1.

Selected Characteristics of the Mexican-Origin Population in the U.S., by Nativity, 2016

Characteristic Native-born (24,695,129) Foreign-born (11,508,371)
Age
< 18 50.5% 5.4%
18–24 12.3% 6.4%
25–44 22.6% 45.3%
45–54 6.0% 21.5%
55–64 4.5% 12.3%
65–74 2.5% 5.9%
75–84 1.1% 2.4%
85+ 0.5% 0.8%
Gender
(Female) 49.6% 47.8%
Immigration status
Naturalized citizen N/A 28.7%
Noncitizen arrival
Pre-2000 N/A 51.6%
Post-2000 N/A 48.5%
Education
Less than high school 57.2% 55.9%
High school graduate 16.8% 25.1%
At least some college 25.9% 19.0%
Occupation 1
Professional 28.1% 9.9%
Service 18.3% 30.0%
Sales 30.2% 12.5%
Construction 6.6% 21.0%
Production 16.8% 26.5%
Average family size 4.4 4.3
Poverty (100% FPL or lower) 21.6% 21.2%
Retirement income and social safety net
Social Security retirement income $11,697.87 $9,947.99
Supplemental Security Income $8,401.05 $7,315.97
Private retirement income $20,495.82 $13,557.16
Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program 26.3% 22.3%
Open in a new tab

FPL = federal poverty level.

Source: American Community Survey 2016; Public Use Microfile Sample (PUMS 1%).

1

Adapted from Gonzales-Barrera & Lopez, 2013 (IPUMS 1% sample).

As a consequence of structural disadvantages, these socioeconomic differences persist into later life (Bookman & Kimbrel, 2011). Given that they form a large part of the total U.S. immigrant population, the high rate of poverty among Mexican-born immigrants is a vexing problem. In addition, Hispanics, particularly foreign-born Mexican Americans, frequently lack adequate income for retirement.

As Table 1 shows, only one-quarter of the Mexican immigrant (foreign-born) population has U.S. citizenship. A 2015 Pew Survey cites a lack of English proficiency and the high economic costs associated with the naturalization process as common barriers for becoming a U.S. citizen (Gonzalez-Barrera, 2017). Other barriers prevent older people from immigrating—in particular, the Office of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services’ mandate to exclude immigrants who are likely to become a “public charge” engenders a serious disincentive for family reunification in later life. Many lawful permanent residents—often called “green card” holders—are sponsored by a relative or others who promise to provide all of the support the immigrant needs, a policy referred to as “sponsor deeming.” This federal law can profoundly affect family sponsors since they are held responsible for all of the immigrants’ needs, including medical care (Angel, 2003). This responsibility lasts until the sponsored immigrant becomes a U.S. citizen, is credited with 40 quarters (10 years) of work in the United States, leaves the United States permanently, or dies (U.S. Immigration and Citizenship Services, 2013). Migrants must wait five years after becoming permanent legal residents to qualify for any social programs, including Medicaid and Medicare coverage. At a time in life when serious and chronic illnesses that are extremely expensive to manage become common, this requirement places a potentially impossible burden on sponsors, no doubt discouraging family reunification.

For example, certain state legislatures consider the income of family sponsors when determining eligibility for late-life immigrants who lack sufficient resources to pay for medical care. In Texas, for example, the state legislature adopted a new law in 2011 that allowed county health care programs to consider immigrant sponsors’ income and resources when determining an immigrant’s eligibility for medical benefits (Dunkleberg, 2016). The law also gave those county programs the authority to recover costs of care from the sponsors (Texas State Legislature, 2011).

Undocumented immigrants are ineligible for all federal health and welfare benefits, with greatly varying access to services at state, local, and organizational levels (Krogstad, 2016). Federal immigration policies and priorities—most notably the Trump administration’s focus on arrest, detention, and deportation, along with similar state and local immigration enforcement initiatives—may seriously impair the health and well-being of unauthorized older Hispanic immigrants and mixed-status families (Becerra, Quijano, Wagaman, Cimino, & Blanchard, 2015)

In general, Mexican Americans have poor prospects for retirement security. For example, Mexican-origin immigrants are far less likely than non-Hispanic Whites and Blacks to participate in a retirement plan (see Figure 1) and consequently rely largely on Social Security for retirement income (Mudrazija & Angel, 2014). However, undocumented immigrants are legally excluded from participating in Social Security (Treas, 2007) as well as other federally funded public benefits such as Medicare, Medicaid, and Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) subsidies. A deep irony is that undocumented immigrants may be required to pay into Social Security and Medicare systems as a condition of employment, even though they have little to no prospect of recouping these contributions as benefits later in life (Gee, Gardner, & Wiehe, 2016). Mexican-origin immigrants are nearly twice as likely to be employed beyond age 65 than their U.S.-born older adult counterparts are (Gerst & Burr, 2012).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Open in a new tab

Retirement plan by race, Mexican ancestry, and nativity, 2006. Source: 2006 Health and Retirement Study.

Over the coming decades, population aging and a changing policy landscape will lead to a more complex set of challenges for aging Mexican-origin individuals and their families. As we discuss below, one challenge concerns the traditional role of the Hispanic family in caregiving for older adults.

Although the Mexican-origin population has a generally disadvantaged socioeconomic profile relative to other groups, they have lower mortality rates than both other Hispanic groups and non-Hispanic Whites in almost every age bracket (Arias, Heron, & Xu, 2017). However, older people of Mexican origin, and especially immigrants of Mexican origin, have higher morbidity rates despite relatively lower mortality rates (Riosmena, Kuhn, & Jochem, 2017). Individuals of Mexican origin, especially those who are foreign-born, tend to report more disability and chronic health problems than do their native-born White counterparts (Hummer, Benjamins, & Rogers, 2004). As shown in Figure 2, whether born in Mexico or in the United States, Mexican-origin men older than 65 are spending approximately one-half of their later years in a seriously inactive state (Angel, Angel, & Hill, 2015). By contrast, Whites can expect to live one-quarter of the years past 65 with a serious disability. (Hayward, Warner, Crimmins, & Hidajat, 2007). For Mexican-origin adults, this projected longer period of incapacitation entails a greater need for assistance. The prospect of a low-income population facing an increased number of years characterized by poor health and dependency also poses potentially serious economic, social, and political problems related to the care of this population (Angel et al., 2015).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Open in a new tab

Life expectancy at age 65 and percentage impaired. Source: Hispanic Established Populations for the Epidemiologic Studies of the Elderly, 1993/94–2010/11; Angel 2015.

A focus on older Mexican-origin adults, including immigrants and U.S.-born individuals, reveals further policy-relevant health issues, such as the management of diabetes and associated conditions. Data from the Hispanic Established Populations for the Epidemiologic Studies of the Elderly reveal a high prevalence of type 2 diabetes in the older Mexican-origin population (Beard, Al Ghatrif, Samper-Ternent, Gerst, & Markides, 2009). Behavioral and cultural changes associated with migration to the United States may also increase the risk of certain chronic conditions and the negative outcomes associated with them (Beard et al., 2016). The adoption of an American lifestyle is associated with high-fat diets, unwanted daily stressors, and insufficient exercise, all behavioral factors that can contribute to higher rates of diabetes (Abraido-Lanza, Chao, & Florez, 2005). Comorbid depression is highly prevalent among older Mexican-origin diabetics (Black, 2002), and type 2 diabetes is associated with a higher risk of dementia, suggesting that the Mexican-origin population faces an elevated risk of this condition (Mayeda, Haan, Kanaya, Yaffe, & Neuhaus, 2013).

A lifetime of low pay means that many Mexican-origin older adults lack the financial resources necessary to support their basic health care needs as they age. Lack of adequate Social Security and other retirement income, moreover, has serious consequences for the welfare of Mexican-origin and immigrant intergenerational households (Mudrazija & Angel, 2014). The economic vulnerability of immigrant intergenerational households is magnified when wage earners are undocumented, due to their exceptional exploitation in the low-wage labor market, a lack of access to jobs that offer retirement plans or other benefits, and an inability to recoup the benefit of payroll taxes paid into Social Security and Medicare (Zallman et al., 2016). The possibility of deportation to Mexico increases uncertainty for Mexican nationals who have been long settled in the United States and who face unsure access to health care and social care systems in Mexico (Liebert & Ameringer, 2013).

Even though Medicare has played a central role in reducing poverty among elderly Americans, serious inequalities in health insurance based on race and Mexican-origin ethnicity persist. Elderly individuals of Mexican origin are more likely than individuals of any other racial or ethnic group to lack adequate health insurance coverage (Angel & Angel, 2015). Reasons for this include employment in jobs that do not offer health insurance, immigration status, and language and other barriers to enrollment in health plans even when available. However, one recent study of hypertension treatment in California indicated that the ACA increased coverage for the population at large and improved access to treatment for hypertension among Mexican Americans (McKenna, Alcalá, Lê-Scherban, Roby, & Ortega, 2017).

The broad exclusion of undocumented immigrants from federally funded benefits such as Medicare, Medicaid, ACA subsidies, and the Children’s Health Insurance Program, which finance prenatal care as well as health care for children, extends to so-called universal Medicare benefits that cover specific medical services, such as scheduled hemodialysis and hospice care, on the basis of diagnosis (Cervantes et al., 2017; Gray, Boucher, Kuchibhatla, & Johnson, 2017). Research suggests that lack of access to medically appropriate services financed by Medicare creates severe hardships for seriously ill and dying undocumented immigrants (Cervantes et al., 2017; Gray et al., 2017). Undocumented status also blocks access to long-term care, home care, short-term rehabilitative care, and a range of supplies and services normally funded by Medicare or Medicaid. For uninsured Mexican American older adults, as well as for other uninsured undocumented immigrants, access to services outside the scope of hospital “emergency” provisions for the stabilization of life-threatening conditions—financed by state-level Emergency Medicaid programs—is extremely limited. The use of inherently unstable or ethically questionable measures, such as reliance on hospital emergency departments to treat chronic and even terminal conditions or on medical repatriation, reflect the difficulties that health care organizations face in allocating resources for a population that is both poor and uninsurable due to federal exclusions.

Both the proposed Medicaid cuts under the 2018 federal budget and proposed changes to the ACA that would limit access to affordable health insurance will increase pressure on the safety net institutions that newly uninsured patients will be forced to rely on. This will predictably decrease the already limited share of resources available to currently uninsured populations, such as undocumented immigrants. For example, Texas has the highest rate of uninsured residents in the country: One in four Texans has no health coverage. The rate in the Rio Grande Valley, where 89.4% of the population is of Hispanic origin, is even higher, standing at about 38% (Texas Health and Human Services Commission, 2014). Its county government, like other counties nationwide, is required by federal law to pay for emergency medical care for individuals regardless of ability to pay or citizenship status (Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services, 2012). The safety net hospitals, which provide these services to those who do not qualify for Medicaid, are reimbursed by the county or health care districts for uncompensated care (Kuruvilla & Rajeev Raghavan, 2014). However, patient access to public hospital care is generally limited in the Rio Grande Valley, as it is in the United States more generally (Hacker, Anies, Folb, & Zallman, 2015). As a result, destitute residents often go without the care they need. Private hospitals are not a viable alternative because they are not required to provide charity care (Texas Office of the Attorney General, 2018). Such disparities in health coverage create additional burden for already struggling Mexican-born families.

Reliance on federally funded nutrition and other social programs

Food insecurity is much more common among low-income Hispanic older adults compared to other older adult households. In 2015, one in five Hispanic older adult households lacked adequate food at some point during the year, compared with roughly 1 in 10 from all other older adult households (Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, 2017). Because of their low incomes, Hispanics depend on federally funded nutrition programs, including the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP)—formerly known as food stamps—and Meals on Wheels, funded by the Community Development Block Grant program. In 2016, SNAP helped at least 10 million Hispanics and in 2015 lifted 2.5 million Hispanics above the poverty line, including 200,000 adults aged 60 years and older (Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, 2017). Hispanic immigrants are especially reliant on SNAP (Blau & Mackie, 2017). Between 2006 and 2010, 20% of this population participated in the program, a rate four times higher than that of U.S.-born older adults (Gerst & Burr, 2012). SNAP costs for issued benefits have increased nearly 90% since 2008, partly in response to the economic down-turn and the concurrent need for a fiscal stimulus (Nischan, 2012; U.S. Department of Agriculture, 2018a). Proposed cuts to this $68 billion dollar program and other social programs could have negative health consequences for low-income Hispanics of all ages (U.S. Department of Agriculture, 2018b). For example, proposed rollbacks of nutritional standards, such as requirements for nutritional content in school lunches, could also have a negative effect on economically disadvantaged Mexican and other Hispanic families, who are at greater risk for health problems due to social and genetic factors (Jalonick, 2017).

As with all federally funded programs, undocumented immigrants themselves are broadly excluded from participation in SNAP, although mixed-status households may participate in SNAP if some members of the household (for example, U.S.-born children whose parents are undocumented) qualify. As noted above, recent actions of the Trump administration that focus on the “public charge” question appear to be affecting participation in nutrition programs, as immigrants avoid programs due to fear of scrutiny concerning immigration status.

Other social investments that affect Mexican-origin and other Hispanic older adults include federal grants to state and local governments under the Older Americans Act (OAA) of 1965 (McGarry, 2013). The OAA funds a range of community-based services for adults aged 60 and older, such as home-delivered and congregate meals, family caregiver support, and transportation (Fox-Grage & Ujvari, 2014). Research shows that Hispanic participants in OAA social service programs are more likely to be disabled, poor, urban residents, and Medicaid recipients than non-Hispanic participants; these participants have the highest rate of unmet care needs (Herrera, George, Angel, Markides, & Torres-Gil, 2013). The Trump administration’s proposed 2018 federal budget includes cuts to such social programs (Office of Management and Budget, 2017).

Family caregiving

Older Mexican-origin people use significantly fewer long-term services and supports than do their non-Hispanic White counterparts (Thomeer, Mudrazija, & Angel, 2015). For this population, service availability (within a geographic area) and affordability (costs relative to needs for assistance) are barriers to the use of nursing homes (Trielli, 2017). Although Hispanics and those of Mexican origin tend not to use nursing homes, keeping aging parents at home is increasingly challenging.

As health declines, the likelihood of living in a multigenerational household increases for Mexican-born older adults (Angel, Angel, Aranda, & Miles, 2004). Late-life immigrants are highly dependent on family, and they are especially likely to rely on a single family member for help with household tasks, with close to 40% relying on one child for help (Angel, Rote, & Markides, 2017). Research also shows that native-born parents are more willing than children of foreign-born parents to seek assistance for household tasks and financial affairs from both within and outside the family network, including social service agencies (Angel, Rote, Brown, Angel, & Markides, 2016).

Because older Mexican-origin individuals postpone using nursing homes until they are very ill, they are more expensive to care for, given their seriously compromised health (Thomeer et al., 2015). While Mexican-origin families keep their aging relatives out of nursing homes for as long as they can, the burden may become overwhelming given longer life-spans. Low-income Mexican-origin families may have no choice but to resort to Medicaid-funded community-based and institutional long-term care. A large fraction of elderly Mexican-origin individuals have incomes below the poverty line and rely heavily on Medicaid, which could become scarcer under Republican policy (Angel & Angel, 2015). Severe cuts to the Medicaid system would invariably affect nursing home access for everyone as well as access to community-based services, creating further pressures on strained state budgets and already burdened families.

Again, pending cuts to federal funding of state-level Medicaid programs, which finance safety net health care, will have a negative effect on older low-income citizens and permanent legal residents. The Trump administration’s immigration policies could also affect caregiving relationships for older adults. Immigrants who are undocumented are at increased risk for detention and deportation. If a family caregiver is undocumented, that immigration action could disrupt intergenerational caregiving. Policies to curtail family migration are making family reunification, and thus family caregiving, more difficult.

What if? The American Health Care Act

As Nadash and her colleagues explain in this issue, the American Health Care Act of 2017 (AHCA; H.R. 1628)—one of the Congressional bills that sought to replace Obamacare—demonstrated how Republicans wish to reshape Medicaid. Currently, the federal government funds up to 76% of a state’s Medicaid program (Kaiser Family Foundation, 2017). Poorer states like Mississippi get a bigger match. Although these states receive a larger proportion of federal subsidies, the proposed legislation would cap state spending on a per-person basis, rather than matching state Medicaid spending (Dine, Park, & Broaddus, 2017). This capped amount would be adjusted in line with the medical component of the Consumer Price Index (CPI), switching to the overall CPI in later years (Park, Aron-Dine, & Broaddus, 2017); however, such increases would fail to adjust for the higher costs of health and long-term care for the aging population.

This bill was estimated to cut federal deficits by more than $300 billion by 2026 (Park et al., 2017), largely through savings extracted from reductions in Medicaid expansion. Had it been introduced, the law would have almost doubled the number of uninsured people younger than 65 from 26 million today to 49 million by 2026. As noted earlier, Hispanics, and especially Mexican Americans, are most likely to be uninsured throughout the life course. As such, reductions in Medicaid would severely affect the Hispanic population and, depending on the level at which Medicaid would be funded, this mechanism could greatly increase the vulnerability of the older Mexican-origin population by limiting funds available to states (Grogan, 2017).

Lower Medicaid spending also affects the delivery of health care. Under the ACA, Medicare rate parity for primary care physicians was beneficial, allowing them to care for Medicaid patients they would not have been able to see otherwise. Had the AHCA passed, reductions in federal Medicaid spending would have invariably lowered revenue to physicians caring for low-income and Medicaid patients. As a result, physicians may have been reluctant to continue care for disabled individuals, the chronically ill, and people with Alzheimer’s disease. Although such a scenario may seem unlikely, the potential health consequences for older Hispanics are dire. One study has shown that aging Hispanic patients with type 2 diabetes who live in impoverished areas at the Texas–Mexico border report more frequent physician visits on average for medical care than do nondiabetic patients (Mier et al., 2012).

Physicians along the Texas–Mexico border are more likely to experience the painful costs of reductions in Medicaid. The border region in Texas is considered an underserved medical area (Texas Health and Human Services Commission [THHSC], 2014); data show that there are fewer hospital beds and fewer physicians in the border area than in the interior of Texas. While there are fewer physicians in the border region, proportionally more physicians accept Medicaid there than in Texas’ nonborder areas (THHSC, 2014). Although the client base for primary care physicians along the Texas–Mexico border tends to be less educated, be less healthy overall, and have more complex chronic disease management, they receive lower reimbursement rates (THHSC, 2014).

Conclusions

Ultimately, the Trump administration’s proposed budget was not adopted and enacted but, along with Republican-led efforts to repeal and replace the ACA, it provides a strong signal of the administration’s priorities. More generally, the present thrust of federal policy making could have serious consequences for all low-income populations in the United States, but especially for older adults of Mexican origin. These individuals have poorer health, with notably higher chronic disease burden than non-Hispanic Whites. They are living longer but are sicker, poorer, and more dependent on fragile social and health care systems. They are also especially vulnerable to the Trump administration’s immigration policy, which puts long-settled undocumented immigrants at risk of detention, deportation and profound family disruption.

References

  1. Abraido-Lanza AF, Chao MT, & Florez KR (2005). Do healthy behaviors decline with greater acculturation? Implications for the latino mortality paradox. Social Science and Medicine, 61, 1243–1255. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.01.016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Angel JL (2003). Devolution and the social welfare of elderly immigrants: Who will bear the burden? Public Administration Review, 63, 79–89. doi: 10.1111/puar.2003.63.issue-1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Angel JL, Angel RJ, Aranda MP, & Miles TP (2004). Can the family still cope? Social support and health as determinants of nursing home use in the older mexican-origin population. Journal of Aging and Health, 16, 338–354. doi: 10.1177/0898264304264203 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Angel JL, Rote S, & Markides K (2017). The role of the latino family in late-life caregiving. In Wilmoth JM & Silverstein MD (Eds.), In later-life social support and service provision in diverse and vulnerable populations. New York, NY: Taylor and Francis. [Google Scholar]
  5. Angel JL, Rote SM, Brown DC, Angel RJ, & Markides KS (2016). Nativity status and sources of care assistance among elderly Mexican-Origin Adults. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 29(3), 243–258. doi: 10.1007/s10823-014-9234-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Angel RJ, & Angel JL (2015). Latinos in an aging world: Social, psychological, and economic perspectives. New York, NY: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  7. Angel RJ, Angel JL, & Hill TD (2015). Longer lives, sicker lives? Increased longevity and extended disability among Mexican-origin elders. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 70(4), 639–649. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbu158 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Arias E, Heron M, & Xu J (2017). United States Life Tables, 2013. National Vital Statistics Reports, 66 (3). Hyattsville, Maryland: National Center for Health Statistics. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr66/nvsr66_03.pdf. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Beard HA, Al Ghatrif M, Samper-Ternent R, Gerst K, & Markides KS (2009). Trends in diabetes prevalence and diabetes-related complications in older Mexican Americans from 1993–1994 to 2004–2005. Diabetes Care, 32(12), 2212. doi: 10.2337/dc09-0938 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Beard JR, Officer A, Carvalho IA, Sadana R, Pot AM, Michel J-P, . . . Chatterji S. (2016). The World report on ageing and health: A policy framework for healthy ageing. The Lancet, 387(10033), 2145–2154. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00516-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Becerra D, Quijano LM, Wagaman MA, Cimino A, & Blanchard KN (2015). How immigration enforcement affects the lives of older latinos in the United States. Journal of Poverty, 19(4), 357–376. doi: 10.1080/10875549.2014.999969 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Black SA (2002). Diabetes, diversity, and disparity: What do we do with the evidence? American Journal of Public Health, 92(4), 543–548. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.92.4.543 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Blau FD, & Mackie C (2017). The Economic and fiscal consequences of immigration: Chapter: 3 Socioeconomic outcomes of immigrants. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press. Retrieved from https://www.nap.edu/read/23550/chapter/1 [Google Scholar]
  14. Bookman A, & Kimbrel D (2011). Families and elder care in the twenty-first century. From: the Future of Children, 21(2), 117–140. doi: 10.1353/foc.2011.0018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. (2017). SNAP helps millions of Latinos. Washington, D.C.: Author. Retrieved from http://www.cbpp.org/research/food-assistance/snap-helps-millions-of-latinos [Google Scholar]
  16. Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services. (2012). Emergency Medical Treatment & Labor Act (EMTALA). Baltimore, Maryland: Author. Retrieved from https://www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Legislation/EMTALA/index.html?redirect=/EMTALA/ [Google Scholar]
  17. Cervantes L, Fischer S, Berlinger N, Zabalaga M, Camacho C, Linas S, & Ortega D (2017). The illness experience of undocumented immigrants with end-stage renal disease. JAMA Internal Medicine, 177(4), 529–535. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.8865 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Dine AA, Park E, & Broaddus M (2017). Cassidy, graham state estimates irrelevant to assessing their health Bill’s effects. Washington, D.C.: Center for Budget and Policy Priorities. Retrieved from https://www.cbpp.org/sites/default/files/atoms/files/9-18-17health.pdf [Google Scholar]
  19. Dunkleberg A (2016). Immigrants’ access to health care in Texas: An updated landscape. Austin, Texas: Center for Public Policy Priorities. Retrieved from https://forabettertexas.org/images/HW_2016_ImmigrantsAccess_FullReport.pdf [Google Scholar]
  20. Fox-Grage W, & Ujvari K (2014). The Older Americans Act. Washington, D.C.: AARP Public Policy Institute. Retrieved from http://www.aarp.org/content/dam/aarp/research/public_policy_institute/health/2014/the-older-americans-act-AARP-ppi-health.pdf [Google Scholar]
  21. Gassoumis ZD, Wilber KH, Baker LA, & Torres-Gil FM (2009). Who are the latino baby boomers? Demographic and economic characteristics of a hidden population. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 22(1), 53–68. doi: 10.1080/08959420903408452 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Gee LC, Gardner M, & Wiehe M (2016). Undocumented immigrants’ state & local tax contribution. Washington, D.C.: The Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy. Retrieved from https://itep.org/wp-content/uploads/immigration2016.pdf [Google Scholar]
  23. Gerst K, & Burr J (2012). Welfare program participation among older immigrants. Public Policy & Aging Report, 22(2), 12–16. doi: 10.1093/ppar/22.2.12 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Gonzalez-Barrera A (2017). mexican lawful immigrants among the least likely to become U.S. Citizens. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://www.pewhispanic.org/2017/06/29/mexican-lawful-immigrants-among-least-likely-to-become-u-s-citizens/ [Google Scholar]
  25. Gray NA, Boucher NA, Kuchibhatla M, & Johnson KS (2017). Hospice access for undocumented immigrants. JAMA Internal Medicine, 177(4), 579–580. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.8870 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Grogan CM (2017). How the ACA addressed health equity and what repeal would mean. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 42(5), 985–993. doi: 10.1215/03616878-3940508 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Hacker K, Anies M, Folb BL, & Zallman L (2015). Barriers to health care for undocumented immigrants: A literature review. Risk Management and Healthcare Policy, 8, 175–183. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S70173 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Hayward MD, Warner DF, Crimmins EM, & Hidajat MM (2007). Does longer life mean better health? Not for native-born Mexican Americans in the health and retirement survey. In Whitfield JLAAKE (Ed.), The health of aging Hispanics: The Mexican-origin population (pp. 85–95). New York, NY: Springer Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  29. Herrera AP, George R, Angel JL, Markides K, & Torres-Gil F (2013). Variation in Older Americans act caregiver service use, unmet hours of care, and independence among Hispanics, African Americans, and Whites. Home Health Care Services Quarterly, 32(1), 35–56. doi: 10.1080/01621424.2012.755143 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Hummer RM, Benjamins M, & Rogers R (Eds.). (2004). Race/ethnic disparities in health and mortality among the elderly: A documentation and examination of social factors. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. [Google Scholar]
  31. Jalonick MC (2017). Trump administation to cut some school lunch standards. Philly Voice. Retrieved from http://www.phillyvoice.com/trump-administration-to-roll-back-some-school-meal/. [Google Scholar]
  32. Kaiser Family Foundation. (2017). Medicaid’s role in nursing home care. Washington, D.C.: Author. Retrieved from http://www.kff.org/infographic/medicaids-role-in-nursing-home-care/ [Google Scholar]
  33. Krogstad JM (2016). 5 facts about Mexico and immigration to the U.S. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/02/11/mexico-and-immigration-to-us/ [Google Scholar]
  34. Kuruvilla R, & Rajeev Raghavan M (2014). Health care for undocumented immigrants in Texas. Austin, Texas: Texas Medical Association. Retrieved from https://www.texmed.org/July14Journal/ [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Liebert S, & Ameringer CF (2013). The health care safety net and the affordable care act: Implications for hispanic immigrants. Public Administration Review, 73(6), 810–820. doi: 10.1111/puar.12147 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  36. Mayeda ER, Haan MN, Kanaya AM, Yaffe K, & Neuhaus J (2013). Type 2 diabetes and 10-year risk of dementia and cognitive impairment among older Mexican Americans. Diabetes Care, 36(9), 2600–2606. doi: 10.2337/dc12-2158 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. McGarry K (2013). The safety net for the elderly. In Bailey MJ & Danziger S (Eds.), Legacies of the war on poverty (pp. 179–205). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation. [Google Scholar]
  38. McKenna RM, Alcalá HE, Lê-Scherban F, Roby DH, & Ortega AN (2017). The affordable care act reduces hypertension treatment disparities for mexican-heritage latinos. Medical Care, 55(7), 654–660. doi: 10.1097/mlr.0000000000000726 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Mudrazija S, & Angel JL (2014). Diversity and the economic security of older Americans. In Hudson R & Baltimore MJHUP (Eds.), The new politics of old age policy (Vol. Third, pp. 138–154). Baltimore, Maryland: Johns Hopkins University Press. [Google Scholar]
  40. Mier N, Wang X, Smith ML, Irizarry D, Treviño L, Alen M, & Ory MG (2012). Factors Influencing Health Care Utilization in Older Hispanics with Diabetes along the Texas-Mexico Border. Population Health Management, 15(3), 149–156. doi: 10.1089/pop.2011.0044 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Nischan M (2012). The economic case for food stamps. The Atlantic. Retrieved from https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2012/07/the-economic-case-for-food-stamps/260015/. [Google Scholar]
  42. Office of Management and Budget. (2017). Budget of the U.S. government: A new foundation for american greatness fiscal year 2018. Retrieved from https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/whitehouse.gov/files/omb/budget/fy2018/budget.pdf.
  43. Office of the White House. (2017). Statement by the president on cuban immigration policy. Retrieved from https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2017/01/12/statement-president-cuban-immigration-policy. [Google Scholar]
  44. Ortman JM, Velkoff VA, & Hogan H (2014). An aging nation: The older population in the United States Current Population Reports. P25–1140. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Bureau of the Census. Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/prod/2014pubs/p25-1140.pdf [Google Scholar]
  45. Park E, Aron-Dine A, & Broaddus M (2017). House Republican Health Plan Shifts $370 Billion in Medicaid Costs to States. Washington, D.C.: Center for Budget and Policy Priorities. Retrieved from https://www.cbpp.org/research/health/house-republican-health-plan-shifts-370-billion-in-medicaid-costs-to-states [Google Scholar]
  46. Passel JS, & Cohn DV (2017). As Mexican share declined, U.S. unauthorized immigrant population fell in 2015 below recession level. Washington, D.C.: Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/04/25/as-mexican-share-declined-u-s-unauthorized-immigrant-population-fell-in-2015-below-recession-level/ [Google Scholar]
  47. Pew Research Center. (2014). The U.S. Hispanic population has increased sixfold since 1970. Washington, D.C.: Author. Retrieved from http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2014/02/26/the-u-s-hispanic-population-has-increased-sixfold-since-1970/ [Google Scholar]
  48. Riosmena F, Kuhn R, & Jochem WC (2017). Explaining the immigrant health advantage: Self-selection and protection in health-related factors among five major national-origin immigrant groups in the United States. Demography, 54(1), 175–200. doi: 10.1007/s13524-016-0542-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Stepler R, & Brown A (2016). Statistical portrait of hispanics in the United States. Washington, D.C: Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://www.pewhispanic.org/2016/04/19/statistical-portrait-of-hispanics-in-the-united-states-key-charts/ [Google Scholar]
  50. Texas State Legislature. (2011). Indigent Health Care and Treatment Act, 82nd Legislature, SB 7; section 1.16 & 1.17 Retrieved 3/13/18. http://www.legis.state.tx.us/billlookup/Text.aspx?LegSess=821&Bill=SB7 and http://www.statutes.legis.state.tx.us/Docs/HS/htm/HS.61.htm#61.001
  51. Texas Health and Human Services Commission. (2014). Factors influencing health care on the Texas-Mexico Border. Report to the Texas legislature and the health and human services commission, border rates and expenditures advisory committee. Austin, Texas: Author. Retrieved from https://hhs.texas.gov/file/14166/download?token=F6onDy2Y [Google Scholar]
  52. Texas Office of the Attorney General. (2018). Access to Health Care Q&A. Austin, Texas: Author. Retrieved from https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/faq/access-to-health-care-qa [Google Scholar]
  53. Thomeer MB, Mudrazija S, & Angel JL (2015). How do race and hispanic ethnicity affect nursing home admission? Evidence from the health and retirement study. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 70(4), 628–638. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbu114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Treas J (2007). Older immigrantrs and U.S. welfare reform. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 17(9/10), 8–33. doi: 10.1108/eb013323 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  55. Trielli D (2017). AP-NORC poll: Hispanics lack confidence in nursing homes. Chicago, Illinois: NORC Center for Public Affairs Researhc. Retrieved from http://www.apnorc.org/news-media/Pages/AP-NORC-poll-Hispanics-lack-confidence-in-nursing-homes.aspx [Google Scholar]
  56. U.S. Census Bureau. (2011). Race and Hispanic or Latino ethnicity. Washington, D.C.: Author. [Google Scholar]
  57. U.S. Census Bureau. (2015). Table 2. Population by Race and Hispanic Origin: 2014 and 2060. Washington, D.C.: Author. Retrieved 6/22/2017 from https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/publications/2015/demo/p25-1143.pdf. 2014 National Projections. [Google Scholar]
  58. U.S. Census Bureau. (2016). Selected characteristics of the Foreign-Born Population-Mexican Origin, 2016. Washington, D.C.: Author. Retrieved from https://factfinder.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?pid=ACS_16_1YR_S0506&prodType=table [Google Scholar]
  59. U.S. Census Bureau. (2017a). The nation’s older population is still growing, census bureau reports. Washington, D.C.: Author. Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2017/cb17-100.html [Google Scholar]
  60. U.S. Census Bureau. (2017b). Annual estimates of the resident population by sex, race, and Hispanic origin for the United States, states, and counties: April 1, 2010 to July 1, 2016. Washington, D.C.: Author. Retrieved from https://factfinder.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?pid=PEP_2016_PEPSR6H&prodType=table [Google Scholar]
  61. U.S. Department of Agriculture. (2018a). Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) linkages with the general economy. Washington, D.C.: Author. Retrieved from https://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/food-nutrition-assistance/supplemental-nutrition-assistance-program-snap/economic-linkages/ [Google Scholar]
  62. U.S. Department of Agriculture. (2018b). Supplemental nutrition assistance program participation and costs: 2018. Washington, D.C.: Author. Retrieved from https://fns-prod.azureedge.net/sites/default/files/pd/SNAPsummary.pdf [Google Scholar]
  63. U.S. Immigration and Citizenship Services. (2013). How Do I financially sponsor someone who wants to immigrate. Washington, D.C.: Author. Retrieved from https://www.uscis.gov/sites/default/files/USCIS/Resources/F3en.pdf [Google Scholar]
  64. Zallman L, Wilson FA, Stimpson JP, Bearse A, Arsenault L, Dube B, . . . Woolhandler S. (2016). Unauthorized immigrants prolong the life of medicare’s trust fund. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 31(1), 122–127. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3418-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES