Skip to main content
The Journal of Veterinary Medical Science logoLink to The Journal of Veterinary Medical Science
. 2023 May 31;85(7):735–738. doi: 10.1292/jvms.22-0576

Comparative whole-genome analysis of diphtheria toxin-producing Corynebacterium ulcerans isolates from sheltered cats in Osaka, Japan

Kaoru UMEDA 1,*, Yuji HIRAI 1
PMCID: PMC10372255  PMID: 37258129

Abstract

Diphtheria toxin-producing Corynebacterium ulcerans is a zoonotic pathogen that causes human diphtheria-like symptoms. After performing whole-genome analysis of the five isolates from sheltered cats in Osaka, Japan, we compared them with genome sequences of 25 strains of C. ulcerans from a public database. The five isolates from cats harbored 14 genes encoding possible virulence factors in diphtheria-toxin-producing C. ulcerans. These isolates also had diphtheria toxin gene-encoding prophage in their chromosome, although differences were found in other prophages possession. Whole-genome single-nucleotide polymorphism analysis showed that cats’ isolates belonged to ST337 branch, as were strains from Japanese human patients, with 41 or more single-nucleotide polymorphisms variations. High-resolution single-nucleotide polymorphism analysis of C. ulcerans was sufficient to distinguish cats’ isolates clearly as not different by conventional genotyping methods.

Keywords: Corynebacterium ulcerans, diphtheriae toxin, prophage, single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) analysis, whole-genome sequencing


Diphtheria toxin-producing Corynebacterium ulcerans is a zoonotic pathogen that can cause diphtheria-like infectious disease [20]. The bacterium is detected in widely diverse hosts such as cats, dogs, cows, monkeys, killer whales, lions, birds, squirrels, and shrew-moles around the world [3, 4, 6, 14]. It has been suggested that human C. ulcerans infection occur primarily from dogs and cats [3, 4, 11].

We earlier investigated the prevalence of diphtheria toxin-producing C. ulcerans among dogs and cats held in animal shelters, and in wild rats in Osaka, Japan, between 2011 and 2012. In the paper, the diphtheria-toxin producing C. ulcerans was detected in 5 of 137 cats’ throat swabs (3.6%), whereas was not detected in 125 dogs and 29 rats [19].

Recently, high-throughput sequencing analyses of C. ulcerans have progressed in many countries. Many sequences obtained by whole-genome sequencing (WGS) have been deposited into the public databases DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank. It has been reported that previous genomic analyses revealed genes encoding virulence factors other than diphtheria toxin gene (tox) and the distribution of various prophages, which play an important role in the acquisition of the pathogenicity [2, 13, 15, 18]. Sekizuka et al. recently reported whole-genome single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) analysis as being a higher-resolution and more accurate genotyping method than other conventional methods such as ribotyping [12].

To better understand the genetic characteristics of C. ulcerans isolates from sheltered cats obtained during our earlier investigation, WGS analyses of isolates were performed. Our analysis comprised of a reassessment of the genotypes through whole-genome SNP analysis, and an investigation into the presence of genes encoding virulence factors and prophages in the genome.

The five C. ulcerans isolates from cats used in this study (ID; 11021B-1, 11022B-1, 11030B-1, 11031B-1, and 12109B-1) produced diphtheria toxin, and showed identical biochemical properties, antibiotic sensitivity patterns, and genotypes by conventional methods of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and ribotyping [19]. The information of the five host cats was described in our previous report [19]. Briefly, host cats were mature or old. The cats were mutually unrelated and all exhibited wounds or symptoms of weakness. Four of the five cats were strays.

Genomic DNA samples were extracted using a DNeasy Power Soil kit (Qiagen Inc., Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The short-read library was prepared using a Nextera DNA Flex Library Prep Kit (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) and was sequenced on iSeq 100 instrument (Illumina Inc.). Pair-end reads were assembled de novo using CLC Genomic Workbench software 10.0.2 (Qiagen Inc.). Automatic annotation was performed using DFAST pipeline (https://dfast.ddbj.nig.ac.jp/) [17] with subsequent manual modifications. Bacterial species were also confirmed by the average nucleotide identity (ANI) value output from the DFAST pipeline. The sequence type (ST) for multi-locus sequence typing (MLST) was identified by MLST 2.0 (https://cge.food.dtu.dk/services/MLST/) [9]. Prophage regions were searched using PHASTER (https://phaster.ca/) [1], followed by manual modifications according to the earlier reports [10, 13, 18]. Prophage regions were compared using EasyFig. 2.2.3 software [16]. As whole genome SNP analysis, SNP detection and phylogenetic inference were performed using CSI phylogeny 1.4 (https://cge.food.dtu.dk/services/CSIPhylogeny/) [5]. SNP analysis parameters were as follows: minimum depth at SNP positions, 10; relative depth at SNP positions, 10; minimum distance between SNPs (prune), 10; minimum SNP quality, 30; minimum read mapping quality, 25; minimum Z-score, 1.96.

The five isolates from cats were compared with genome sequences of 25 strains of C. ulcerans (Supplementary Table 1). Strain 0102 was used as the reference sequence. The phylogenetic tree was constructed using maximum-likelihood method with MEGA X software [8]. To calculate the maximum-likelihood tree, Tamura-Nei model was used.

Genomic information of the five isolates is presented in Table 1. To ascertain the whole-genome sequences of C. ulcerans isolates, the obtained short reads were assembled de novo. Then between five and seven scaffolds per isolate were constructed with more than 45 × genome coverages. The size of the genome assemblies varied between 2.47 and 2.52 Mbp. The guanine-cytosine contents were all 53%. The number of cording sequences was between 2,217 and 2,296. These genomic features were comparable to those of C. ulcerans strains described in earlier reports [10, 12, 13, 15].

Table 1. Genomic information of diphtheria toxin-producing Corynebacterium ulcerans isolates from cats in Japan.

Information 11021B-1 11022B-1 11030B-1 11031B-1 12109B-1
Genome size (bp) 2,520,008 2,520,022 2,471,752 2,471,864 2,472,441
Total read length (bp) 138,130,750 137,029,935 139,847,110 130,459,018 113,007,331
Genome coverage (×) 55.0 54.6 55.7 52.0 45.0
G-C content (%) 53.4 53.4 53.3 53.3 53.3
The number of scaffolds 1 6 7 5 6 6
N50 (bp) 544,356 433,376 816,060 543,501 552,369
Cording sequences 2,296 2,281 2,220 2,222 2,217
Average protein length (aa) 320.9 322.6 325.2 324.9 325.3
Cording ratio (%) 87.7 87.6 87.6 87.6 87.5
Ribosomal RNAs 3 3 3 3 3
Transfer RNAs 51 47 51 47 51
CRISPRs 3 3 3 3 3
ST 337 337 337 337 337
ANI (%) 2 98.6 98.6 98.7 98.6 98.7
Accession Nos. BQFG01000001-
BQFG01000006
BQFH01000001-
BQFH01000007
BQFI01000001-
BQFI01000005
BQFJ01000001-
BQFJ01000006
BQFK01000001-
BQFK01000006

G-C: guanine-cytosine, CRISPRs: clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats, ST: sequence type, ANI: average nucleotide identity. 1 Scaffolds are defined as various contigs joined together with undetermined sequences. 2 ANI (%) was calculated reference as C. ulcerans strain NCTC7910.

Previous reports have described that 14 possible virulence factors other than tox gene are detected in C. ulcerans genomes [15, 18]. The scaffolds of the five isolates from cats contained the 12 genes encoding virulence factors; endoglycosidase (endoE), cell wall-associated hydrolase (cwlH), neuraminidase H (nanH), phospholipase D (pld), rpf-interacting protein (rfpI), five surface-anchored protein (spaB, spaC, spaD, spaE, and spaF), trypsin-like serine protease (tspA), and verom serine protease (vsp1). The five isolates lacked the remaining two genes, shiga toxin-like ribosome-binding protein (rbp) and an additional verom serine protease (vsp2), which were found in 809 tox-negative C. ulcerans strains [14] (Supplementary Table 2). The five cats’ isolates, harboring tox, were clarified to possess virulence factors the same as those in 0102 strains from a Japanese human patient with symptoms of dyspnea and fever in 2001 [7, 11, 13].

Typically, C. ulcerans carries one or more prophages related to acquisition of the tox gene [10, 13]. In addition, variation of prophages was observed among C. ulcerans isolates. It is expected to have correlation with virulence and zoonotic transmission [10]. Sekizuka et al. reported that the whole genome sequence of 0102 strain harbored three distinct prophages (ΦCUlC0102-I, II and III) [13]. One of these, ΦCUlC0102-I was tox-encoding, whereas ΦCUlC0102-II and III contained no gene encoding known virulence factors. The five isolates from cats had tox-positive prophage on their chromosomes, and the genetic compositions of tox-positive prophages were identical to those of ΦCULC0102-I. Also, ΦCULC0102-II existed only in 11021B-1 and 11022B-1. ΦCUlC0102-III was absent from all isolates. No other prophage was identified by PHASTER search (Table 2). The 0211 strain and FH2016 strain, which are from Japanese human patients in 2002 and 2016, included three prophages (ΦCUlC0102-I, II and III), similarly to 0102 strain. The five isolates from cats could be divided into 2 different types according to prophage possessions. Moreover, they were distinct from those of three strains from Japanese human patients.

Table 2. Prophage possession of Corynebacterium ulcerans isolates from cats in Japan.

Prophage 1 Virulence factor Length (kbp) 11021B-1 11022B-1 11030B-1 11031B-1 12109B-1
CULC0102-I diphtheria toxin (tox) 38.3 + + + + +
CULC0102-II 21.4 + + - - -
CULC0102-III 41.4 - - - - -
Other prophage 2 ND ND ND ND ND

1 According to references [10, 13]. 2 Prophage possession except for CULC0102-I, II, and III, searched using PHASTER program.

The phylogenetic tree was constructed based on whole-genome SNP analysis of 30 C. ulcerans strains: 5 in the present study and 25 from humans and animals from many countries available in the DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank database (Fig. 1A). The whole-genome SNP analysis has been the most effective genotyping method at present [12]. The five isolates from sheltered cats belonged to the ST337 branch, as were WGS of three Japanese strains from human patients (0102, 0211, and FH2016). To date, only Japanese strains have been reported as belonging to ST337 [12]. The ST337 strains are known to have low genetic variability by SNP analysis [12]. Zooming in the branch of ST337, 8 strains including 5 isolates from cats in Japan and 3 strains from Japanese human patients were shown branched off from each other (Fig. 1B). The comparison of SNPs variation within these 8 strains was shown in Fig. 1C. SNPs variation among the five isolates from cats in Japan, which were mutually unrelated but indistinguishable by PFGE, ribotyping, or MLST, ranged from 41 to 176. Also, SNPs variation between isolates from timewise and geographically unlinked cats and human patients in Japan, belonging to ST337, ranged from 122 to 162.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Phylogenetic tree based on whole-genome single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) analysis of Corynebacterium ulcerans. (A) Genome sequences of the five C. ulcerans isolates from cats (boldface) were analyzed with 25 strains from worldwide. Strain information is arranged in the order of country, source, ST and productivity of diphtheria toxin in parentheses. Accession numbers are presented in the Supplementary Table 1. SNPs positions were calculated to 79,788 positions: 22 minimum and 34,569 maximums. In the tree, the proportion of sites where at least 1 unambiguous base was present in at least 1 sequence for each descendent clade is shown next to each internal node. The bar at the bottom of the tree indicated the scale of the amount of nucleotide substitutions per site. (B) From the phylogenetic tree of whole-genome SNPs, eight Japanese strains belonging to ST337 are shown in a close-up view. Strain information is arranged in the order of source, province, and isolated year in parentheses. The bar at the bottom of the tree indicated the scale of the amount of nucleotide substitutions per site. (C) The numbers of SNP differences between among eight Japanese strains was calculated and shown in the table.

In summary, findings from WGS comparative analysis of diphtheria toxin-producing C. ulcerans isolates from sheltered cats suggest that the five isolates harbored 14 genes encoding known virulence factors. However, the five isolates mutually differed by their possession of prophages that do not encode a tox gene. Whole-genome SNP analysis showed that the five isolates from cats are classified to the ST337 branch as with strains from Japanese human patients, whereas were clearly differentiated by SNPs variations. These results suggested that WGS analysis is useful for C. ulcerans comparative genotyping because cats’ isolates which had identical genotype by conventional methods were distinguished by prophage possession and SNPs differences. Our WGS data represent the first examples obtained for Japanese cats, however the limitation of this study is the few isolates obtained in a limited area were analyzed. Further real-world investigations are necessary to confirm the genetic relationship between humans and animals in C. ulcerans transmission.

CONFLICT OF INTERESTS

The authors have no conflict of interest to disclose.

Supplementary

Supplement Tables
jvms-85-735-s001.pdf (51.2KB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

Earlier research was supported by the Osaka Municipal Animal Care and Control Centre. We are grateful to Dr. Jun Kawase, Dr. Mitsutoshi Senoh and Dr. Masaaki Iwaki for useful discussions and comments for this study. This research was benefited by no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Arndt D, Grant JR, Marcu A, Sajed T, Pon A, Liang Y, Wishart DS. 2016. PHASTER: a better, faster version of the PHAST phage search tool. Nucleic Acids Res 44 W1: W16–21. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw387 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Dangel A, Berger A, Konrad R, Sing A. 2019. NGS-based phylogeny of diphtheria-related pathogenicity factors in different Corynebacterium spp. implies species-specific virulence transmission. BMC Microbiol 19: 28. doi: 10.1186/s12866-019-1402-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Dias AA, Santos LS, Sabbadini PS, Santos CS, Silva Junior FC, Napoleão F, Nagao PE, Villas-Bôas MH, Hirata Junior R, Guaraldi AL. 2011. Corynebacterium ulcerans diphtheria: an emerging zoonosis in Brazil and worldwide. Rev Saude Publica 45: 1176–1191. doi: 10.1590/S0034-89102011000600021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Iwaki M. 2018. Corynebacterium ulcerans infection. Nippon Juishikai Zasshi 71: 542–546 (in Japanese). [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kaas RS, Leekitcharoenphon P, Aarestrup FM, Lund O. 2014. Solving the problem of comparing whole bacterial genomes across different sequencing platforms. PLoS One 9: e104984. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0104984 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Katsukawa C, Umeda K, Inamori I, Kosono Y, Tanigawa T, Komiya T, Iwaki M, Yamamoto A, Nakatsu S. 2016. Toxigenic Corynebacterium ulcerans isolated from a wild bird (ural owl) and its feed (shrew-moles): comparison of molecular types with human isolates. BMC Res Notes 9: 181. doi: 10.1186/s13104-016-1979-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Komiya T, Seto Y, De Zoysa A, Iwaki M, Hatanaka A, Tsunoda A, Arakawa Y, Kozaki S, Takahashi M. 2010. Two Japanese Corynebacterium ulcerans isolates from the same hospital: ribotype, toxigenicity and serum antitoxin titre. J Med Microbiol 59: 1497–1504. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.022491-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. 2018. MEGA X: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol 35: 1547–1549. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msy096 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Larsen MV, Cosentino S, Rasmussen S, Friis C, Hasman H, Marvig RL, Jelsbak L, Sicheritz-Pontén T, Ussery DW, Aarestrup FM, Lund O. 2012. Multilocus sequence typing of total-genome-sequenced bacteria. J Clin Microbiol 50: 1355–1361. doi: 10.1128/JCM.06094-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Meinel DM, Margos G, Konrad R, Krebs S, Blum H, Sing A. 2014. Next generation sequencing analysis of nine Corynebacterium ulcerans isolates reveals zoonotic transmission and a novel putative diphtheria toxin-encoding pathogenicity island. Genome Med 6: 113. doi: 10.1186/s13073-014-0113-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ministry of Health Labour and Welfare, Japan. 2018. Q and A for Corynebacterium ulcerans infection. https://www.mhlw.go.jp/bunya/kenkou/kekkaku-kansenshou18/corynebacterium_02.html [accessed on March 10, 2023] (in Japanese).
  • 12.Sekizuka T, Katsukawa C, Kuroda M, Shibayama K, Otsuji K, Saito M, Yamamoto A, Iwaki M. 2020. Limitations of Ribotyping as genotyping method for Corynebacterium ulcerans. Emerg Infect Dis 26: 2457–2459. doi: 10.3201/eid2610.200086 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Sekizuka T, Yamamoto A, Komiya T, Kenri T, Takeuchi F, Shibayama K, Takahashi M, Kuroda M, Iwaki M. 2012. Corynebacterium ulcerans 0102 carries the gene encoding diphtheria toxin on a prophage different from the C. diphtheriae NCTC 13129 prophage. BMC Microbiol 12: 72. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-12-72 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Seto Y, Komiya T, Iwaki M, Kohda T, Mukamoto M, Takahashi M, Kozaki S. 2008. Properties of corynephage attachment site and molecular epidemiology of Corynebacterium ulcerans isolated from humans and animals in Japan. Jpn J Infect Dis 61: 116–122. doi: 10.7883/yoken.JJID.2008.116 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Subedi R, Kolodkina V, Sutcliffe IC, Simpson-Louredo L, Hirata R, Jr, Titov L, Mattos-Guaraldi AL, Burkovski A, Sangal V. 2018. Genomic analyses reveal two distinct lineages of Corynebacterium ulcerans strains. New Microbes New Infect 25: 7–13. doi: 10.1016/j.nmni.2018.05.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Sullivan MJ, Petty NK, Beatson SA. 2011. Easyfig: a genome comparison visualizer. Bioinformatics 27: 1009–1010. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr039 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Tanizawa Y, Fujisawa T, Nakamura Y. 2018. DFAST: a flexible prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline for faster genome publication. Bioinformatics 34: 1037–1039. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx713 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Trost E, Al-Dilaimi A, Papavasiliou P, Schneider J, Viehoever P, Burkovski A, Soares SC, Almeida SS, Dorella FA, Miyoshi A, Azevedo V, Schneider MP, Silva A, Santos CS, Santos LS, Sabbadini P, Dias AA, Hirata R, Jr, Mattos-Guaraldi AL, Tauch A. 2011. Comparative analysis of two complete Corynebacterium ulcerans genomes and detection of candidate virulence factors. BMC Genomics 12: 383. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-12-383 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Umeda K, Hatakeyama R, Abe T, Takakura K, Komiya T, Iwaki M, Yamamoto A, Sanada S. 2015. Distribution of Corynebacterium ulcerans in dogs, cats and rats in Osaka city and characteristics of isolates. Nippon Juishikai Zasshi 68: 765–769 (in Japanese). [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wagner KS, White JM, Crowcroft NS, De Martin S, Mann G, Efstratiou A. 2010. Diphtheria in the United Kingdom, 1986–2008: the increasing role of Corynebacterium ulcerans. Epidemiol Infect 138: 1519–1530. doi: 10.1017/S0950268810001895 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplement Tables
jvms-85-735-s001.pdf (51.2KB, pdf)

Articles from The Journal of Veterinary Medical Science are provided here courtesy of Japanese Society of Veterinary Science

RESOURCES