Myocarditis has been recognized as a complication of COVID-19 mRNA vaccinations, particularly in adolescent and young adult male patients.1 Cardiovascular sequelae after an acute episode of myocarditis, regardless of pathogenesis, remain as issues of concern. Although the reported short-term clinical trajectory after COVID-19 vaccine–associated myocarditis appears reassuring, with resolution of cardiac symptoms and normalization of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in most of the adolescent patients,2 the long-term cardiovascular outcomes remain unclear.
We evaluated the cardiovascular outcomes at up to 1 year in adolescent patients diagnosed with COVID-19 vaccine–associated myocarditis. Their electrocardiographic, echocardiographic, and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) findings at diagnosis were reviewed. At latest follow-up, clinical assessment, ECG, echocardiogram (Vivid E9, GE Medical System, Horten, Norway), and CMR (Siemens Magnetom Aera 1.5 T MRI system, Germany) were performed. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board and the parents of subjects gave informed consent. Data that support our findings are available from the corresponding authors on reasonable request.
Forty patients (33 male) 15.1±1.6 (range, 12.7–17.9) years of age and followed up for 10.0±1.3 (range, 5.6–12.3) months, representing all cases identified in Hong Kong during the period of study, were included. Twenty-nine (73%) patients were asymptomatic, whereas 7 (18%) reported noncardiac chest pain, 3 (8%) reported palpitations, and 1 (3%) reported fatigue during follow-up, with none having cardiac arrhythmias, angina, or heart failure. The ECG results were abnormal, with ST-segment or T-wave abnormalities in 31 (78%) patients at presentation and normalized in all at latest follow-up.
Echocardiographic assessment at presentation showed normal LVEF in all patients, mild increased echogenicity of the pericardium or left ventricular (LV) lateral wall in 6 (15%), and minimal (<2 mm) pericardial effusion in 2 (5%). At latest follow-up, 38 (95%) patients had normal LVEF, 2 (5%) had borderline LVEF of 51.1% and 53.6%, and all had normal right ventricular (RV) fractional area change. Analyses of RV and LV 4-chamber longitudinal strain were feasible, when ≥5 segments in each plane could be analyzed, in 36 patients and LV global longitudinal and circumferential strain in 35. The LV 4-chamber longitudinal, global longitudinal, and circumferential systolic strain was impaired (Z score <–2) in 8 (22%), 7 (20%), and 4 (11%) patients, respectively. The RV longitudinal systolic strain and early- and late-diastolic strain rates were impaired in 2 (6%), 3 (8%), and 10 (28%) patients, respectively. Mean Z scores of diastolic functional indices of both ventricles were significantly lower than zero (all P<0.002; Figure A). No patients had coronary abnormalities.
Thirty-nine patients had CMR at presentation, 26 of whom had abnormal findings. These included features of myocarditis in 22 (56%), abnormal T1 values in 21 (54%), abnormal T2 values in 24 (62%), late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) in 19 (49%), and reduced LVEF in 7 (18%). The CMR-derived LVEF at initial assessment correlated with LV 4-chamber longitudinal (r=0.36, P=0.04), global longitudinal (r=0.41, P=0.02), and circumferential (r=0.38, P=0.03) absolute systolic strain at follow-up echocardiography. Follow-up CMR performed in 26 patients with initial abnormal CMR findings revealed mild residual LGE in 15 (58%; Figure B), borderline LVEF in 2 (8%), and normal findings in 11 (42%) patients. None of these patients had abnormal T1 (pregadolinium 1013±28 ms and postgadolinium 473±43 ms) or T2 (48±2 ms) values or features of myocarditis. For the patient without initial assessment, follow-up CMR showed mild LGE with normal LVEF. Distribution of LGE in the 16 patients shows predilection of involvement of lateral segments (Figure C). The presence of previous LGE correlated with LGE on follow-up (φ-coefficient=0.71, P<0.001). Patients with (n=16) and those without (n=11) LGE on follow-up CMR had similar demographic and echocardiographic parameters (all P>0.05).
To our knowledge, this is the longest follow-up study to date with comprehensive cardiac evaluation and imaging of adolescent patients diagnosed with COVID-19 vaccine–associated myocarditis. Global systolic ventricular function appears to be preserved. However, impairment of LV and RV myocardial deformation and persistence of LGE in a significant subset of patients with up to 1 year of follow-up was observed. Growing evidence suggests worse prognosis in the presence of altered myocardial deformation and LGE in patients with myocarditis.3 A short-term study reported abnormal CMR-derived LV longitudinal strain and LGE in 70% to 75% of adolescent patients with COVID-19 vaccine–associated myocarditis followed up for 3 to 8 months.4 Similar CMR findings were found in young adults studied at 3 to 6 months after the initial diagnosis.5 The implications of impaired systolic and diastolic myocardial deformation and LGE in our patient subset remain unclear. Nonetheless, given that impaired myocardial deformation and LGE are indicators of subclinical myocardial dysfunction and fibrosis, there exists a potential long-term effect on exercise capacity and cardiac functional reserve during stress.
Limitations of our study include a relatively small patient cohort, the lack of a trajectory that depicts changes in myocardial deformation over time, and performance of CMR only in patients with initial abnormal CMR findings. Further long-term studies to define the clinical and functional implications of these subclinical abnormalities in a larger cohort are undoubtedly warranted.
ARTICLE INFORMATION
Sources of Funding
None.
Disclosures
None.
Nonstandard Abbreviations and Acronyms
- CMR
- cardiac magnetic resonance
- LGE
- late gadolinium enhancement
- LV
- left ventricular
- LVEF
- left ventricular ejection fraction
- RV
- right ventricular
For Sources of Funding and Disclosures, see page 438.
Circulation is available at www.ahajournals.org/journal/circ
Contributor Information
Clement Kwong-man Yu, Email: kmclementyu@gmail.com.
Sabrina Tsao, Email: stsao@hku.hk.
Carol Wing-kei Ng, Email: carol26@gmail.com.
Gilbert T. Chua, Email: gtc510@gmail.com.
Kwok-lap Chan, Email: yumichan@hku.hk.
Julia Shi, Email: zshi.julia@gmail.com.
Yumi Yuk-ting Chan, Email: yumichan@hku.hk.
Patrick Ip, Email: patricip@hku.hk.
REFERENCES
- 1.Mevorach D, Anis E, Cedar N, Bromberg M, Haas EJ, Nadir E, Olsha-Castell S, Arad D, Hasin T, Levi N, et al. Myocarditis after BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine against Covid-19 in Israel. N Engl J Med. 2021;385:2140–2149. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2109730 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kracalik I, Oster ME, Broder KR, Cortese MM, Glover M, Shields K, Creech CB, Romanson B, Novosad S, Soslow J, et al. ; Myocarditis Outcomes After mRNA COVID-19 Vaccination Investigators and the CDC COVID-19 Response Team. Outcomes at least 90 days since onset of myocarditis after mRNA COVID-19 vaccination in adolescents and young adults in the USA: a follow-up surveillance study. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2022;6:788–798. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(22)00244-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Eichhorn C, Greulich S, Bucciarelli-Ducci C, Sznitman R, Kwong RY, Grän C. Multiparametric cardiovascular magnetic resonance approach in diagnosing, monitoring, and prognostication of myocarditis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022;15:1325–1338. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2021.11.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Schauer J, Buddhe S, Gulhane A, Sagiv E, Studer M, Colyer J, Chikkabyrappa SM, Law Y, Postman MA. Persistent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging findings in a cohort of adolescents with post-coronavirus disease 2019 mRNA vaccine myopericarditis. J Pediatr. 2022;245:233–237. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2022.03.032 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Patel YR, Shah NR, Lombardi K, Agarwal S, Salber G, Patel R, Poppas A, Atalay MK. Follow-up cardiovascular magnetic resonance findings in patients with COVID-19 vaccination-associated acute myocarditis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022;15:2007–2010. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2022.06.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]