Skip to main content
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases logoLink to PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
. 2023 Jul 17;17(7):e0011284. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011284

Prevalence and predictors of Aspergillus seropositivity and chronic pulmonary aspergillosis in an urban tertiary hospital in Sierra Leone: A cross-sectional study

Sulaiman Lakoh 1,2,3,*, Joseph B Kamara 1,2, Emma Orefuwa 4, Daniel Sesay 2, Darlinda F Jiba 2, Olukemi Adekanmbi 5,6, Gibrilla F Deen 1,2, James B W Russell 1,2, Abubakarr Bailor Bah 1,2, Maxwell Joseph Kargbo 1, Emmanuel Firima 7,8,9,10, George A Yendewa 11,12,13, David W Denning 4,14
Editor: Chaoyang Xue15
PMCID: PMC10374077  PMID: 37459359

Abstract

Background

In the World Health Organization Global Tuberculosis (TB) Report 2022, 37% of pulmonary TB patients were clinically diagnosed and thus many people were treated for TB without evidence of the disease. Probably the most common TB misdiagnosis is chronic pulmonary aspergillosis (CPA). In this study, we aimed to assess the prevalence and predictors of Aspergillus seropositivity and CPA in patients with chronic respiratory symptoms in an urban tertiary hospital in Sierra Leone.

Methodology/principal findings

We used a cross-sectional study design to recruit adults (≥18 years) from the Chest Clinic of Connaught Hospital, Freetown between November 2021 and July 2022. Aspergillus antibody was detected using LDBio Aspergillus IgM/IgG. Logistic regression was performed to assess the independent predictors of Aspergillus seropositivity and CPA. Of the 197 patients with chronic respiratory symptoms, 147 (74.6%) were male. Mean age was 47.1 ± 16.4 years. More than half (104, 52.8%) had been diagnosed with TB in the past, while 53 (26.9%) were on TB treatment at the time of recruitment. Fifty-two (26.4%) patients were HIV positive, 41 (20.8%) were seropositive for Aspergillus and 23 (11.6%) had CPA, 2 (3.8%) with current TB and 18 (17.3%) with past TB. Common radiologic abnormalities reported were localized fibrotic changes 62 (31.5%), consolidation 54 (27.4%), infiltrates 46 (23.4%), hilar adenopathy 40 (20.3%) and pleural effusion 35 (17.85) and thickening 23 (11.7%). Common symptoms were weight loss 144 (73.1%), cough 135 (68.5%), fever 117 (59.4%) and dyspnea 90 (45.7%). Current or past TB infection {aOR 3.52, 95% CI (1.46, 8.97); p = 0.005} was an independent predictor of Aspergillus seropositivity and CPA.

Conclusions/significance

We report a high prevalence of Aspergillus antibody seropositivity and CPA, underscoring the need to integrate the prevention and management of pulmonary fungal infections with TB services and asthma care in order to reduce unnecessary morbidity and mortality.

Author summary

Chronic pulmonary aspergillosis (CPA) is a common cause of chronic lung disease. It mimics tuberculosis (TB), and can occur during or after TB treatment, mainly in patients with lung cavities. Since nearly 40% of TB cases worldwide are undiagnosed microbiologically, CPA may be the most common cause of symptoms in patients treated for TB without a microbiological diagnosis. Understanding the burden of CPA using the Aspergillus antibody test is an important initial step in addressing this persistent and chronic neglected disease in low-resource settings and presents an opportunity for healthcare workers to acquire the skills needed to reduce unnecessary CPA-related mortality. This study assessed the prevalence of Aspergillus seropositivity and CPA and found that 20.8% of patients were positive for Aspergillus antibodies and 11.6% had CPA. Common symptoms were cough, weight loss, difficulty breathing and fever and TB was an independent predictor of Aspergillus seropositivity and CPA.

Background

The prevention and control of fungal diseases like chronic pulmonary aspergillosis (CPA) remains a major challenge, especially in resource-poor countries [1,2]. Estimates of global post-TB prevalence of CPA based on 2005 TB data suggest that approximately 1.2 million people are affected [3]. This fact demonstrates the trajectory of the increasing burden of CPA and supports recent estimates of 3 million global cases of CPA [4].

Aspergillus can coexist with or complicate tuberculosis (TB) and other chronic lung diseases and thus may pose a significant challenge to their management [3]. In the World Health Organization (WHO) Global TB Report 2022, approximately 37% of pulmonary TB patients were clinically diagnosed (i.e., were smear/Xpert negative or not done) [5]. Thus, many people were treated for TB without evidence of the disease. Probably the most common TB misdiagnosis is CPA, which causes considerable morbidity and unnecessary mortality. CPA can mimic TB and can occur during or after TB treatment, mainly in those with lung cavities [4].

CPA is a global health problem that primarily affects low- and middle-income countries. A study in Iran found that 6% of people had CPA at the time of their first TB episode within 12 months of diagnosis [6]. A recent study in Indonesia found that 13% of patients developed CPA after 6 months of TB treatment [7]. Recent data from India and Vietnam found that more than 50% of TB patients with new symptoms had CPA [8,9].

In sub-Saharan Africa, there are no comprehensive estimates of the number of misdiagnosed TB when the diagnosis is actually CPA. A prospective longitudinal study in northern Uganda found that 6.5% of people with cavities each year developed CPA 2–7 years after TB, compared with 0.2% of people without cavities [10]. A study from Nigeria found that 8.7% of the smear/Xpert-negative population had CPA [11]. In Ghana, 9.7% of patients with presumed TB had CPA [12]. We recently estimated that 6000 people in Sierra Leone suffer from CPA [13].

Sierra Leone is one of the 30 countries with the highest TB burden in the world, with 24,000 cases (298 TB cases per 100,000 population) in 2021 [3]. In our recent studies, nearly 50% of patients treated for TB at the national referral hospital in Sierra Leone were clinically diagnosed [14,15]. Despite this and the fact that CPA is probably the main cause of their symptoms, there is limited data on the burden of this disease among patients with chronic respiratory symptoms in Sierra Leone owing to the limited human resource and diagnostic capacity for the detection, management and prevention of this fungal infections. The study aimed to assess prevalence and predictors of Aspergillus seropositivity and CPA in patients with chronic respiratory symptoms in an urban tertiary hospital in Sierra Leone in order to determine the local needs for training of healthcare workers on the detection and management of CPA, with the overall aim of improving health outcomes of people with CPA in Sierra Leone.

Methods

Ethics statement

Ethics approval was obtained from the Sierra Leone Ethics and Scientific Review Committee (SLESRC) of the Ministry of Health and Sanitation, Government of Sierra Leone in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations and declaration of Helsinki. Approval to conduct this study was granted by SLESRC, dated 16th June 2021. Written informed consent was obtained from individual participants before enrolling in the study.

Study design

We used a cross-sectional study design to collect data from adult patients aged 18 years or older from the Chest Clinic of Connaught Hospital, Freetown, Sierra Leone.

Study setting

Sierra Leone is divided into five geographical regions, including the Western Area. The Western Area is the most populous region of Sierra Leone and includes Freetown (the capital city). According to the 2015 population census, Sierra Leone has a total population of 7 million, of which 22% (1.5 million) live in the Western Area [16].

Of the 25 public hospitals in Sierra Leone, 10 provide tertiary care. The study was conducted at Connaught Hospital, Sierra Leone’s main tertiary hospital in Western Area with a capacity of 300 beds. Connaught Hospital’s Chest Clinic has the largest number of TB patients in the country.

Sampling method

Though a minimal sample size of 118 patients was obtained with Fisher’s formula using prevalence of 8.7% of CPA in Nigeria [11], with a coefficient interval of 95% and a margin of error of 0.05, a total of 197 patients were recruited.

Adults (≥18 years) with respiratory symptoms were recruited sequentially from the first week of November 2021 to reach a sample size of 197 patients (approximately 30 weeks). Demographic and clinical information were collected from patients using a standardized data collection form and cross-checked with clinical records. Symptoms and chest radiograph findings were recorded using a diagnostic algorithm published in 2018 [17]. The presumed pneumonia or bronchitis cases were inferred from antibiotic use in this patient cohort.

Laboratory procedure

Blood samples were aseptically collected into EDTA test tubes and immediately centrifuged at 4000 revolutions per minutes for 5 minutes to generate plasma. Separated plasma were then analyzed using Aspergillus IgM/IgG (LDBIO Diagnostics, Lyon, France) point-of-care immunochromatographic (ICT) lateral flow assay [18]. The LDBio Aspergillus IgM/IgG ICT test has a sensitivity and specificity of 88.9% and 96.3%, respectively. Similar to other point-of-care tests, it has been added to the 2021 WHO Model of Essential Diagnostic List (EDL) [18,19].

TB was diagnosed using the Xpert Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB)/RIF assay (Cepheid) with compatible clinical features and chest radiograph findings [20]. HIV test was performed using Determine and SD Bioline HIV-1/2 3.0 test kits (Standard Diagnostics Inc) in the National HIV Testing Algorithm [21]. CD4 cell count was determined using the Alere Pima™ Analyzer (Abbott), a point-of-care testing platform validated in resource-limited settings [22].

Definitions of Aspergillus seropositivity and CPA

Patients with chronic respiratory symptoms such as weight loss, cough, and/or hemoptysis persisting for more than 3 months and positive for LDBIO Aspergillus IgG were considered to have Aspergillus seropositivity regardless of their radiological findings.

The Global Action For Fungal Infections (GAFFI) and its international experts established a case definition for CPA in 2018 to support research and clinical and public health practices in low- and middle-income countries [23]. The GAFFI panel defined CPA as an illness lasting more than three months with the presence of all the typical symptoms (weight loss, persistent cough, and/or hemoptysis) and chest radiograph showing progressive cavitary infiltrates and/or a fungal ball and/or peri-cavitary fibrosis or infiltrates or pleural thickening in patients with a positive Aspergillus IgG serology [23]. Chest radiographs were read and reported by Radiologists and further reviewed by the research team using guidance provided by Leading the International Fungal Education (LIFE) Worldwide (available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zuYoLW-n_2w).

We applied the GAFFI case definition to categorized confirmed CPA and the remaining patients with only two of the key features as probable CPA. In keeping with standard practice, patients with probable and confirmed CPA were given oral itraconazole 400 mg per day for a minimum of 6 months.

Data management and analysis

The data was collected using the Epicollect data platform, pooled into an Excel sheet and clean, coded and exported to SPSS 21.0 (Armonk, NY: IBM Corp) for analysis. The data were summarized using frequencies and measures of central tendency. Normally distributed numerical variables were summarized using mean and standard deviation (SD). Categorical variables were summarized with frequencies and proportions. Demographic, clinical and radiographic characteristics were compared between patients who are seropositive for Aspergillus or had CPA using chi-square or Fisher’s exact test, as appropriate. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify potential predictors of Aspergillus seropositivity and CPA. Only variables which attained p < 0.20 in univariate analysis were included in the final multivariable regression model. The level of significance for all tests was set at p< 0.05 with a 95% confidence interval.

Results

Sociodemographic characteristics and associated disease

Of the 197 patients with chronic respiratory symptoms, 147 (74.6%) were male. The mean age is 47.1 ± 16.4 years. Many patients were married 112 (56.9%) and had secondary education as their highest education level 85 (43.1%). The mean BMI was 17.4 ± 3.7 kg/m2. More than half (104, 52.8%) had been diagnosed with TB in the past, while 53 (26.9%) were on anti-TB treatment at the time of recruitment. Fifty-two (26.4%) patients were HIV positive, 129 (65.5%) had recent or current pneumonia or bronchitis, and 8 (4.1%) each had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or asthma. This method is prone to error but not likely to differ radically from the true number of pneumonia cases given the usual pattern of clinical practice. Pneumonia/bronchitis was not verified by radiology or microbiology testing. Forty-one (20.8%) patients were positive for Aspergillus IgG/IgM antibody (Tables 1 and 2).

Table 1. Socio-demographic and clinical characteristics of study population.

Characteristics N (%)
Gender
 Male 147 (74.6)
 Female 50 (25.4)
Age, years
 Mean ± SD 47.1 ± 16.4
 < 30 30 (15.2)
 30–39 44 (22.3)
 40–49 36 (18.3)
 50–59 39 (19.8)
 60+ 48 (24.4)
Body mass index, kg/m2
 Mean ± SD 17.4 ± 3.7
 < 18.5 (underweight) 124 (62.9)
 18.5–24.9 (normal) 70 (35.5)
 >25 (overweight) 3 (1.5)
Relationship status
 Single 63 (32.0)
 Married 112 (56.9)
 Divorced, separated or widowed 22 (11.2)
Highest education attained
 None 46 (23.4)
 Primary 24 (12.2)
 Secondary 85 (43.1)
 Tertiary 42 (21.3)
Smoking
 Yes 81 (41.1)
 No 116 (58.9)
Alcohol use
 Yes 77 (39.1)
 No 120 (60.9)
Drug use
 Yes 8 (4.1)
 No 189 (95.9)
HIV status
 Positive 52 (26.4)
 Negative 132 (67.0)
 Unknown 13 (6.6)
CD4 count, cells/mm3 (n = 52)
 Mean ± SD 161 ± 93
 < 100 11 (5.6)
 100–199 35 (17.8)
 ≥200 6 (3.0)
Current Tuberculosis
 Yes 53 (26.9)
 No 144 (73.1)
Past Tuberculosis
 Yes 104 (52.8)
 No 93 (47.2)
Chronic lung diseases
 Asthma 8 (4.1)
 COPD 8 (4.1)
Presumed bacterial pneumonia or bronchitis
 Yes 129 (65.5)
 No 68 (34.5)
Duration of acute respiratory symptoms, days
 Median (IQR) 8 (3–12)
 < 7 days 95 (48.2)
 ≥ 7 days 102 (51.8)
Aspergillus seropositivity
 Positive 41 (20.8)
 Negative 156 (79.2)
Chronic pulmonary aspergillosis (CPA)
 Yes 23(11.6%)
 No 174(88.4%)

Table 2. Aspergillus IgM/IgM or CPA by sociodemographic and clinical factors.

Characteristics Aspergillus IgM/IgG CPA
All (%) Positive (%) Negative (%) p-Value All (%) Yes (%) No (%) p-Value
Gender
 Male 147 (74.6) 289 (70.7) 118 (75.6) 0.520 147 (74.6) 17 (73.9) 130 (74.7) 0.934
 Female 50 (25.4) 12 (29.3) 38 (24.4) 50 (25.4) 6 (26.1) 44 (25.3)
Age, years
 < 30 30 (15.2) 5 (12.2) 25 (16.0) 0.890 30 (15.2) 2 (8.7) 28 (16.1) 0.675
 30–39 44 (22.3) 10 (24.4) 34 (21.8) 44 (22.3) 6 (26.1) 38 (21.8)
 40–49 36 (18.3) 7 (17.1) 29 (18.6) 36 (18.3) 6 (26.1) 30 (17.2)
 50–59 39 (19.8) 10 (24.4) 29 (18.6) 39 (19.8) 5 (21.7) 34 (19.5)
 60+ 48 (24.4) 9 (22.0) 39 (25.0) 48 (24.4) 4 (17.4) 44 (25.3)
Body mass index, kg/m2
 < 18.5 (underweight) 124 (62.9) 30 (73.2) 94 (60.3) 0.253 124 (62.9) 16 (69.6) 108 (62.1) 0.681
 18.5–24.9 (normal) 70 (35.5) 11 (26.8) 59 (37.8) 70 (35.5) 7 (30.4) 63 (36.2)
 >25 (overweight) 3 (1.5) - 3 (1.5) 3 (1.5) - 3 (1.7)
Relationship status
 Single 63 (32.0) 12 (29.3) 51 (32.7) 0.908 63 (32.0) 4 (17.4) 59 (33.9) 0.279
 Married 112 (56.9) 24 (58.5) 88 (56.4) 112 (56.9) 16 (69.6) 96 (55.2)
 Divorced, separated or widowed 22 (11.1) 5 (12.2) 17 (10.9) 22 (11.1) 3 (13.0) 19 (10.9)
Highest education attained
 None 46 (23.4) 9 (22.0) 37 (23.7) 0.835 46 (23.4) 5 (21.7) 41 (23.6) 0.456
 Primary 24 (12.2) 5 (12.2) 19 (12.2) 24 (12.2) 1 (4.3) 23 (13.2)
 Secondary 85 (43.1) 20 (48.8) 65 (41.7) 85 (43.1) 13 (56.5) 72 (41.4)
 Tertiary 42 (21.3) 7 (17.1) 35 (22.4) 42 (21.3) 4 (17.4) 38 (21.8)
Smoking
 Yes 81 (41.1) 12 (29.3) 69 (44.2) 0.083 81 (41.1) 6 (26.1) 75 (43.1) 0.119
 No 116 (58.9) 29 (70.7) 87 (55.8) 116 (58.9) 17 (73.9) 99 (56.9)
Alcohol use
 Yes 77 (39.1) 14 (34.1) 63 (40.4) 0.466 77 (39.1) 10 (43.5) 67 (38.5) 0.646
 No 120 (60.9) 27 (65.9) 93 (59.6) 120 (60.9) 13 (56.5) 107 (61.5)
Drug use
 Yes 8 (4.1) 1 (2.4) 7 (4.5) 0.554 8 (4.1) 1 (4.3) 7 (4.0) 0.941
 No 189 (95.9) 40 (97.6) 149 (95.5) 189 (95.9) 22 (95.7) 167 (96.0)
HIV status (n = 184)
 Positive 52 (28.3) 5 (13.2) 47 (32.2) 0.020 52 (28.3) 2 (9.1) 50 (30.9) 0.033
 Negative 132 (71.7) 33 (86.8) 99 (67.8) 132 (71.7) 20 (90.9) 112 (69.1)
CD4 count, cells/mm3 (n = 52)
 < 200 44 (84.6) 4 980.0) 40 (85.1) 0.764 46 (23.4) 2 (8.7) 44 (25.3) 0.117
 ≥200 8 (15.4) 1 (20.0) 7 (14.9)
Current Tuberculosis
 Yes 53 (26.9) 3 (7.3) 50 (32.1) 0.001 53 (26.9) 2 (8.7) 51 (29.3) 0.036
 No 144 (73.1) 38 (92.7) 106 (67.9) 144 (73.1) 21 (91.3) 123 (70.7)
Past Tuberculosis
 Yes 104 (52.8) 31 975.6) 73 (46.8) 0.001 104 (52.8) 18 (78.3) 86 (49.4) 0.009
 No 93 (47.2) 10 (24.4) 83 (53.2) 93 (47.2) 5 (21.7) 88 (50.6)
Xpert smear
 Positive 67 (34.0) 20 (48.8) 47 (30.1) 0.002 67 (34.0) 10 (43.5) 57 (32.8) 0.025
 Negative 38 (19.3) 12 (29.3) 26 (16.7) 38 (19.3) 8 (34.8) 30 (17.2)
 Not available 92 (46.7) 9 (22.0) 83 (53.2) 92 (46.7) 5 (21.7) 87 (50.0)
Asthma
 Yes 8 (4.1) 4 (9.8) 4 (2.6) 0.060 8 (4.1) 1 (4.3) 7 (4.0) 1.000
 No 189 (95.9) 37 (90.2) 152 (97.4) 189 (95.9) 22 (95.7) 167 (96.0)
COPD
 Yes 8 (4.1) 1 (2.4) 7 (4.5) 1.000 8 (4.1) - 8 (4.6) 0.600
 No 189 (95.9) 40 (97.6) 149 (95.5) 189 (95.9) 23 (100) 166 (95.4)
Presumed bacterial pneumonia or bronchitis
 Yes 129 (65.5) 23 (56.1) 106 (67.9) 0.156 129 (65.5)
 No 68 (34.5) 18 (43.9) 50 (32.1) 68 (34.5)
Symptoms
 Fever 117 (59.4) 21 (51.2) 96 (61.5) 0.231 117 (59.4) 13 (56.5) 104 (59.8) 0.766
 Cough 135 (68.5) 27 (65.9) 108 (69.2) 0.679 135 (68.5) 14 (60.9) 121 (69.5) 0.400
 Weight loss 144 (73.1) 25 (61.0) 119 (76.3) 0.049 144 (73.1) 12 (52.2) 132 (75.90 0.016
 Dyspnea 90 (45.7) 18 (43.9) 72 (46.2) 0.797 90 (45.7) 10 (43.5) 80 (46.0) 0.821
 Pleuritic chest pain 46 (23.4) 8 (19.5) 38 (24.4) 0.545 46 (23.4) 5 (21.7) 104 (23.6) 0.846
 Night sweats 44 (22.3) 5 (12.2) 39 (25.0) 0.080 44 (23.3) 2 (8.7) 42 (24.1) 0.095
 Hemoptysis 35 (17.8) 9 (22.0) 26 (16.7) 0.431 35 (17.8) 4 (17.4) 31 (17.8) 0.960

Radiologic findings

Chest radiographs were available for all 197 patients with chronic respiratory symptoms, many of whom showed compatible features with CPA. Fig 1A–1C provide examples of typical x-ray changes in patients with chronic respiratory symptoms. Xray changes reported were bilateral in 100 (50.8%) patients. Common abnormalities reported were localized fibrotic changes in 62 (31.5%), consolidation in 54 (27.4), infiltrates in 46 (23.4%), hilar adenopathy in 40 (20.3%), pleural effusion in 35 (17.9%) and pleural thickening in 23 (11.7%) (Table 3).

Fig 1.

Fig 1

A–C: Images of chest radiographs of patients with a positive Aspergillus antibody.

Table 3. Chest radiographic findings in the patients.

Imaging findings Aspergillus IgG/IgM Chronic pulmonary aspergillosis
All (%) Positive (%) Negative (%) p-Value All (%) Yes (%) No (%) p-Value
Laterality of findings
 Unilateral 97 (49.2) 18 (42.9) 79 (49.2) 0.442 97 (49.20 14 (60.9) 86 (49.4) 0.302
 Bilateral 100 (50.8) 23 (56.1) 77 (49.4) 100 (50.8) 9 (39.1) 88 (50.6)
Infiltrates
 Yes 46 (23.4) 10 (24.4) 36 (23.1) 0.860 46 (23.4) 10 (43.5) 36 (20.7) 0.015
 No 151 (76.6) 31 (75.6) 120 (76.9) 151 (76.6) 13 (56.5) 138 (79.3)
Consolidation
 Yes 54 (27.4) 3 (7.3) 51 (32.7) 0.001 54 (27.4) 9 (39.1) 45 (25.9) 0.180
 No 143 (72.6) 38 (92.7) 105 (67.3) 143 (72.6) 14 (60.9) 129 (74.1)
Hilar adenopathy
 Yes 40 (20.3) 2 (4.9) 38 (24.4) 0.006 40 (20.3) 6 (26.1) 34 (19.5) 0.463
 No 157 (79.7) 39 (95.1) 156 (75.6) 157 (79.7) 17 (73.9) 140 (80.5)
Cavitary changes
 Yes 25 (12.7) 6 (14.6) 19 (12.2) 0.674 25 (12.7) 6 (26.1) 19 (10.9) 0.040
 No 172 (87.3) 35 (85.4) 137 (87.8) 172 (87.3) 17 (73.9) 155 (89.1)
Pleural changes
 None 139 (70.6) 23 (56.10 116 (74.4) 0.056 139 (70.6) 10 (43.5) 129 (74.1) 0.008
 Pleural effusion 35 (17.8) 12 (29.3) 23 (14.7) 35 (17.8) 7 (30.4) 28 (16.1)
 Pleural thickening 23 (11.7) 6 (14.6) 17 (10.9) 23 (11.7) 6 (26.1) 17 (9.8)
Fibrotic changes
 None 79 (40.1) 4 (9.8) 25 (16.0) < 0.001 79 (40.1) 1 (4.3) 78 (44.8) 0.002
 Extensive 40 (20.3) 15 (36.6) 45 (28.8) 40 (20.3) 7 (30.4) 33 (19.0)
 Localized 62 (31.5) 17 (41.5) 75 (48.1) 62 (31.5) 11 (47.8) 51 (29.3)
 Para-cavitary 16 (8.1) 5 (12.2) 11 (7.1) 16 (8.1) 4 (17.4) 12 (6.9)

Aspergillus antibody seropositivity (n = 41) was associated with extensive lung fibrosis (36.6% vs. 20.3%) and peri-cavitary fibrosis/thickening (12.2% vs. 7.1%) (p < 0.001), pleural thickening (14.6% vs. 10.9%) and cavitary changes with or without intracavitary fungal ball (14.6% vs. 11.7%) (Table 2). In contrast, consolidation is more frequent in those with a negative Aspergillus IgG/IgM (32.7% vs. 7.3%) (p = 0.001) and hilar adenopathy (24.4% vs. 4.9%) (p = 0.06). CPA (n = 23) was more frequent in those with cavitary changes (26.1 vs. 10.9) (p = 0.04) as well as both pleural effusion and pleural thickening (p = 0.008) and extensive lung fibrosis and peri-cavitary fibrosis/thickening (p = 0.002) (Table 3).

Symptoms

Respiratory symptoms of the 197 patients are shown in Table 2. Common symptoms were weight loss 144 (73.1%), cough 135 (68.5%), fever 117 (59.4%) and dyspnea 90 (45.7%). Weight loss was significantly less frequent in those with Aspergillus antibody seropositivity (60.9% vs 76.3%) and CPA (52.2% vs. 75.9%) (Table 2). No other symptoms distinguished CPA from other conditions.

Prevalence of CPA

Amongst the Aspergillus seropositive patients, 23 (11.6%) had CPA (Table 1). Of the 23 CPA patients, 10 (43.5%) had detectable Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) on Xpert MTB/Rif, 18 (78.3%) had received TB treatment in the past, 2 (8.7%) had dual HIV/CPA infections (Table 2).

Amongst the 53 patients with current TB, 3 (4.1%) and 2 (3.8%) were Aspergillus seropositive or had CPA respectively (Table 2). Of those with past TB (n = 104), 31 (29.8%) had a positive Aspergillus antibody result and 18 (17.3%) had CPA. The 92 patients without TB had completed TB treatment and were therefore not eligible for a repeat TB test by national standards (n = 8), recruited at a time when there were disruptions in the supply of GeneXpert cartridges (n = 72) or unable to produce sputum for Xpert test (n = 12).

Predictors of Aspergillus seropositivity and CPA

In multivariable analyses, past or current TB infection {aOR 3.52, 95% CI (1.46, 8.97); p = 0.005} and low BMI {aOR 0.2.56, 95%CI (1.01, 6.49); p = 0.047} were independent predictors of a positive Aspergillus seropositivity. People with positive HIV test {aOR 0.25, 95% CI (0.09, 0.74); p = 0.012} and those smoking cigarette {aOR 0.41, 95% CI (1.17, 0.74); p = 0.044} were less likely to have a positive Aspergillus IgM/IgG (Table 4). In those with HIV infection, CD4 count (above or below 200x106) was not linked to Aspergillus seropositivity or CPA. Asthma patients were 7.99 more likely to have a positive Aspergillus seropositivity {aOR 7.99, 955CI (1.55,55.42)}. There is no association between Aspergillus seropositivity and COPD or pneumonia/bronchitis (Table 4). Likewise, asthma, COPD and pneumonia/bronchitis were not linked to CPA. The presence of past or current TB infection {aOR 3.71, 95% CI (1.23, 11.24); p = 0.008} was the only independent predictor of CPA on multivariable analysis (Table 5).

Table 4. Factors associated with Aspergillus seropositivity.

Characteristics Aspergillus seropositivity Univariate Multivariate
Yes No Crude
OR (95% CI)
p-Value Adjusted
OR (95% CI)
p-Value
Gender
 Male 29 (70.9) 118 (75.6) 0.78 (0.36–1.67) 0.520
 Female 12 (29.3) 38 (24.4) Ref
Age, years
 < 45 20 (48.8) 71 (45.5) 1.14 (0.57–2.27) 0.709
 ≥45 21 (51.2) 85 (54.5) Ref
Body mass index, kg/m2
 < 18.5 30 (73.2) 94 (60.3) 1.80 (0.84–3.85) 0.128 2.70 (1.05–6.93) 0.039
 ≥18.5 11 (26.8) 62 (39.7) Ref Ref
Relationship status
 Single 12 (29.3) 51 (32.7) 0.85 (0.40–1.81) 0.676
 Married/others 29 (70.7) 105 (67.3) Ref
Highest education attained
 None 9 (22.0) 37(23.7) 0.90 (0.40–2.07) 0.812
 Primary or higher 32 (78.0) 119 (76.3) Ref
Smoking
 Yes 12 (29.3) 69 (44.2) 0.52 (0.25–1.10) 0.083 0.44 (0.18–1.08) 0.074
 No 29 (70.7) 87 (55.8) Ref Ref
Alcohol use
 Yes 14 (34.1) 63 (40.4) 0.77 (0.37–1.57) 0.466
 No 27 (65.9) 93 (59.6) Ref
Drug use
 Yes 1 (2.4) 7 (4.5) 0.53 (0.06–4.45) 1.000
 No 40 (97.6) 149 (95.5) Ref
HIV status
 Positive 5 (13.2) 47 (32.2) 0.32 (0.18–0.87) 0.020 0.23 (0.09–0.60) 0.012
 Negative 33 (86.8) 99 (67.8) Ref Ref
CD4 count, cells/mm3
 < 200 4 (80.0) 42 (89.4) 0.48 (0.04–5.14) 0.533
 ≥200 1 (20.0) 5 (10.6) Ref
Past or current tuberculosis
 Yes 32 (78.0) 73 (46.8) 4.04 (1.81–9.03) < 0.001 4.63 (1.41–15.24) 0.005
 No 9 (22.0) 83 (53.2) Ref Ref
Asthma
 Yes 4 (9.8) 4 (2.6) 4.11 (0.98–17.20) 0.060 7.99 (1.15–55.42) 0.036
 No 37 (90.2) 152 (97.4) Ref
COPD
 Yes 1 (2.4) 7 (4.5) 0.53 (0.06–4.45) 1.000
 No 40 (97.6) 149 (95.5) Ref
Presumed bacterial pneumonia or bronchitis
 Yes 23 (56.1) 106 (67.9) 0.60 (0.30–1.22) 0.156 0.53 (0.22–1.27) 0.155
 No 18 (43.9) 50 (32.1) Ref Ref
Duration of respiratory symptoms, days
 < 7 days 23 (56.1) 72 (46.2) 1.49 (0.75–2.98) 0.257
 ≥ 7 days 18 (43.9) 84 (53.8) Ref
Fever
 Yes 21 (51.2) 96 (61.5) 0.66 (0.33–1.31) 0.231
 No 20 (48.8) 60 (38.5) Ref
Cough
 Yes 27 (65.9) 108 (69.2) 0.86 (0.41–1.78) 0.679
 No 14 (34.1) 48 (30.8) Ref
Weight loss
 Yes 25 (61.0) 119 (76.3) 0.49 (0.24–1.01) 0.049 0.34 (0.13–0.88) 0.027
 No 16 (39.0) 37 (23.7) Ref Ref
Dyspnea
 Yes 18 (43.9) 72 (46.2) 0.91 (0.46–1.83) 0.797
 No 23 (56.1) 84 (53.8) Ref
Pleuritic chest pain
 Yes 8 (19.5) 38 (24.4) 0.75 (0.32–1.77) 0.514
 No 33 (80.5) 118 (75.6) Ref
Night sweats
 Yes 5 (12.2) 39 (25.0) 0.42 (0.15–1.14) 0.080 0.39 (0.12–1.26) 0.115
 No 36 (87.8) 117 (75.0) Ref Ref
Hemoptysis
 Yes 9 (22.0) 26 (16.7) 1.41 (0.60–3.29) 0.431
 No 32 (78.0) 130 (83.3) Ref

Table 5. Factors associated with CPA.

Characteristics CPA Univariate Multivariate
Yes No Crude
OR (95% CI)
p-Value Adjusted
OR (95% CI)
p-Value
Gender
 Male 17 (73.9) 130 (74.7) 0.96 (0.36–2.59) 0.934
 Female 6 (26.1) 44 (25.3) Ref
Age, years
 < 45 12 (52.2) 79 (45.4) 1.31 (0.55–3.13) 0.540
 ≥45 11 (47.8) 95 (54.6) Ref
Body mass index, kg/m2
 < 18.5 16 (69.6) 108 (62.1) 1.40 (0.55–3.57) 0.484
 ≥18.5 7 (30.4) 66 (37.9)
Relationship status
 Single 4 (17.4) 59 (33.9) 0.41 (0.13–1.26) 0.110 0.51 (0.16–1.70) 0.275
 Married/others 19 (82.6) 115 (66.1) Ref Ref
Highest education attained
 None 5 (21.7) 41 (23.6) 0.90 (0.31–2.58) 0.846
 Primary or higher 18 (78.3) 133 (76.4) Ref
Smoking
 Yes 6 (26.1) 75 (43.1) 0.47 (0.18–1.24) 0.119 0.38 (0.13–1.17) 0.092
 No 17 (73.9) 99 (56.9) Ref Ref
Alcohol use
 Yes 10 (43.5) 67 (38.5) 1.23 (0.51–3.00) 0.646
 No 13 (56.5) 107 (61.5) Ref
Drug use
 Yes 1 (4.3) 7 (4.0) 1.08 (0.13–9.24) 0.941
 No 22 (95.7) 167 (96.0) Ref
HIV status
 Positive 2 (9.1) 50 (30.9) 0.22 (0.05–1.00) 0.042 0.24 (0.05–1.14) 0.073
 Negative 20 (90.9) 112 (69.1) Ref Ref
CD4 count, cells/mm3
 < 200 3 (75.0) 43 (86.0) 0.49 (-.04–5.38) 0.551
 ≥200 1 (25.0) 7 (14.0) Ref
Past or current tuberculosis
 Yes 18 (78.3) 87 (50.0) 3.60 (1.28–10.13) 0.011 3.71 (1.23–11.24) 0.020
 No 5 (21.7) 87 (50.0) Ref Ref
Asthma
 Yes 1 (4.3) 7 (4.0) 1.08 (0.13–9.24) 1.000
 No 22 (95.7) 167 (96.0) Ref
COPD
 Yes - 8 (4.6) - -
 No 23 (100) 166 (95.4)
Presumed bacterial pneumonia or bronchitis
 Yes 15 (65.2) 114 (65.5) 0.99 (0.40–2.46) 0.977
 No 8 (34.8) 60 (34.5) Ref
Duration of respiratory symptoms, days
 < 7 days 13 (56.5) 82 (47.1) 1.46 (0.61–3.50) 0.397
 ≥ 7 days 10 (43.5) 92 (52.9) Ref
Fever
 Yes 13 (56.5) 104 (59.8) 0.88 (0.36–2.11) 0.766
 No 10 (43.5) 70 (40.2) Ref
Cough
 Yes 14 (60.9) 121 (69.5) 0.68 (0.28–1.67) 0.400
 No 9 (39.1) 53 (30.5) Ref
Weight loss
 Yes 12 (52.2) 132 (75.9) 0.35 (0.14–0.84) 0.016 0.41 (0.15–1.13) 0.084
 No 11 (47.8) 42 (24.1) Ref Ref
Dyspnea
 Yes 10 (43.5) 80 (46.0) 0.90 (0.38–2.17) 0.821
 No 13 (56.5) 94 (54.0) Ref
Pleuritic chest pain
 Yes 5 (21.7) 41 (23.6) 0.90 (0.32–2.58) 0.846
 No 18 (78.3) 133 (76.4) Ref
Night sweats
 Yes 2 (8.7) 42 (24.1) 0.30 (0.07–1.33) 0.095 0.39 (0.08–1.90) 0.241
 No 21 (91.3) 132 (75.9) Ref Ref
Hemoptysis
 Yes 4 (17.4) 31 (17.8) 0.97 (0.31–3.06) 0.960
 No 19 (82.6) 143 (82.2) Ref

Discussion

We analyzed the prevalence and predictors of Aspergillus seropositivity and CPA in adult patients with chronic respiratory symptoms in a national referral hospital in Sierra Leone.

Amongst the 197 patients with chronic respiratory symptoms, 20.8% had a positive serum Aspergillus antibody assay, higher than the serological evidence of the 19.5% reported among TB patients with persistent pulmonary symptoms in Kenya [24]. Aspergillus IgG in combination with compatible clinical symptoms and radiologic findings has become the preferred approach for diagnosing CPA [25]. Using the case definition developed by GAFFI [23], we reported a CPA prevalence of 11.6%, split between those being treated for TB (3.8%) and those with a past history of TB (17.3%). A lower prevalence of CPA was reported in Ghanaian patients with suspected TB (9.7%) and Nigerian patients with smear-negative TB (8.7%) [11,12].

The higher prevalence of CPA in our study could be attributed to the additional culture method applied in the detection of CPA in the Nigerian and Ghanian studies. Evidence is accumulating that false-positive results of Aspergillus IgG exist, because a positive Aspergillus antibody is not specific to CPA, and can represent several other Aspergillus-related disorders, including Aspergillus rhinosinusitis, allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis, Aspergillus bronchitis and subacute invasive aspergillosis. We partly address this by categorizing the remaining patients with only two of three key features as probable CPA [23]. Regardless of the category, the high burden of Aspergillus seropositivity reported in our study reflect on our earlier call to improve on the diagnostic capacity of fungal infections in Africa and underscores the need to initiate routine screening among patients with chronic respiratory symptoms and provide timely and appropriate anti-fungal treatment to those with CPA [26,27].

Most of the CPA patients in this study experienced one or more chronic respiratory symptoms. Common symptoms were weight loss (65.9%), cough (61.0%) and dyspnea (43.5%), but none was associated with Aspergillus seropositivity or CPA. Nonetheless, hemoptysis, which is one of the most dramatic and cardinal symptoms of CPA as described by Sapienza was present in only 22% of the patients [28]. The lack of distinctive clinical features clearly indicates that early detection of CPA in patients with chronic respiratory symptoms requires detection of Aspergillus antibody and compatible radiologic findings for diagnosis [29,30]. Because fever is inherently an uncommon symptom of CPA, the high proportion of febrile patients with Aspergillus seropositivity reported in this study warrants a thorough investigation of concurrent pneumonia (or bronchitis), which is reported in 65.5% of patients in this study or subacute invasive aspergillosis whenever an acute presentation occurs in patients with CPA [31,32].

In our study, 13.8% of Aspergillus antibody-positive patients were HIV-infected and 9.8% had dual CPA/HIV infections, which is different from the 7% reported from India [33]. Although these findings may reflect the high burden of HIV in this setting, people living with HIV were less likely to have seropositive Aspergillus antibody on multivariate analysis [34,35]. The reduced ability of HIV-infected individuals to produce antibodies or induce inflammatory changes due to impaired immune responses may explain the protective effect of HIV against Aspergillus seropositivity [36]. Notably, many patients with a positive Aspergillus antibody and CPA had either been diagnosed with TB in the past or were receiving anti-TB treatment at the time of recruitment. TB was an independent predictor of Aspergillus seropositivity and CPA in our univariate analysis and remained significant even in multivariable analysis. CPA is known to coexist with other comorbidities, especially TB. More importantly, nearly 50% of patients treated for TB in this hospital have Xpert/smear-negative TB [14]. CPA may be the underlying disease in these patients, emphasizing the need to integrate management and prevention of pulmonary fungal infections, including CPA into TB care. Asthma has a well-established association with Aspergillus infection [37,38] and in our study, it predicts Aspergillus seropositivity in multivariable analysis. However, we did not confirm the presence of fungal asthma in any of the patients due to the limited diagnostic capacity locally [36,37]. Like asthma, COPD has a link with Aspergillus infection but was not predictive of seropositivity in our study [39].

The radiographic hallmarks of CPA in patients with chronic lung disease are cavities with or without intracavity fungal ball formation, pleural thickening, and pulmonary fibrosis [40]. We found no patient with a visible fungal ball on chest X-ray, but we didn’t have resource to do a computed axial tomography (CT) scan, which would probably have been more sensitive. In the present study, hilar lymphadenopathy and consolidation was less frequent in CPA, whereas extensive pulmonary fibrosis peri-cavitary fibrosis, pleural thickening and pleural effusion were all more likely to be reported in patients with Aspergillus seropositivity and thus could provide valuable information in the diagnosis of CPA. Since CT, which provides better lung details, was not used to diagnose CPA, we may have underestimated the true prevalence of CPA in this study.

Our study used a relatively small sample size and was conducted in one center, so the findings cannot be easily generalized to the Sierra Leonean population with chronic respiratory symptoms. Despite these inherent limitations, we provide the first evidence on Aspergillus seropositivity and CPA in Sierra Leone to highlight the need to train healthcare workers and intensify the diagnosis, management and prevention of CPA in a high TB burden country.

Conclusion

We report a high prevalence of Aspergillus antibody seropositivity and CPA. A common independent predictor of Aspergillus seropositivity and CPA was present or past TB infection. These findings underscore the need to integrate the prevention and control of pulmonary fungal infections with TB services and asthma care in order to reduce unnecessary morbidity and mortality.

Supporting information

S1 Data. SPSS data set for aspergillus seropositivity and chronic pulmonary aspergillosis.

(SAV)

Acknowledgments

The data collection was supported by Umu Barrie, Mariama Kamara, Joseph Sandy and Isata Kamara.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

The project received materials and technical support from the Global Action For Fungal Infections (GAFFI) in designing the study and preparing the manuscript. The funder had no additional role. Data collection was supported financially by UK Research and Innovation as part of the Global Challenges Research Fund, Grant Number ES/P010873/1, which had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Firacative C. Invasive fungal disease in humans: are we aware of the real impact? Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2020. Oct 9; 115: e200430. doi: 10.1590/0074-02760200430 ; PMCID: PMC7546207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Vallabhaneni S, Mody RK, Walker T, Chiller T. The Global Burden of Fungal Diseases. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2016. Mar;30(1):1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.idc.2015.10.004 Epub 2015 Dec 29. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Denning DW, Pleuvry A, Cole DC. Global burden of chronic pulmonary aspergillosis as a sequel to pulmonary tuberculosis. Bull World Health Organ. 2011;89(12):864–72. doi: 10.2471/BLT.11.089441 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bongomin F, Gago S, Oladele RO, Denning DW. Global and Multi-National Prevalence of Fungal Diseases-Estimate Precision. J Fungi (Basel). 2017. Oct 18;3(4):57. doi: 10.3390/jof3040057 ; PMCID: PMC5753159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.World Health Organization: Global TB Report (2020). Available at: https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports.Accessed March 15, 2023.
  • 6.Hedayati MT, Azimi Y, Droudinia A, Mousavi B, Khalilian A, Hedayati N, et al. Prevalence of chronic pulmonary aspergillosis in patients with tuberculosis from Iran. ur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2015;34(9):1759–65. doi: 10.1007/s10096-015-2409-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Setianingrum F, Rozaliyani A, Syam R, Adawiyah R, Tugiran M, Sari CYI, et al. Evaluation and comparison of automated and manual ELISA for diagnosis of chronic pulmonary aspergillosis (CPA) in Indonesia. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2020;98(3):115124. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2020.115124 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Singla R, Singhal R, Rathore R, Gupta A, Sethi P, Myneedu VP, et al. Risk factors for chronic pulmonary aspergillosis in post-TB patients. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2021. Apr 1;25(4):324–326. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.20.0735 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Nguyen NTB, Le Ngoc H, Nguyen NV, Dinh LV, Nguyen HV, Nguyen HT, et al. Chronic Pulmonary Aspergillosis Situation among Post Tuberculosis Patients in Vietnam: An Observational Study. J Fungi (Basel). 2021. Jun 30;7(7):532. doi: 10.3390/jof7070532 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Page ID, Byanyima R, Hosmane S, Onyachi N, Opira C, Richardson M, et al. Chronic pulmonary aspergillosis commonly complicates treated pulmonary tuberculosis with residual cavitation. Eur Respir J. 2019;53(3):1801184. doi: 10.1183/13993003.01184-2018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Oladele RO, Irurhe NK, Foden P, Akanmu AS, Gbaja-Biamila T, Nwosu A, et al. Chronic pulmonary aspergillosis as a cause of smear-negative TB and/or TB treatment failure in Nigerians. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2017;21(9):1056–1061. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.17.0060 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ocansey BK, Otoo B, Adjei A, Gbadamosi H, Kotey FCN, Kosmidis C, et al. Chronic pulmonary aspergillosis is common among patients with presumed tuberculosis relapse in Ghana. Med Mycol. 2022. Sep 9;60(9): myac063. doi: 10.1093/mmy/myac063 ; PMCID: PMC9462665. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lakoh S, Orefuwa E, Kamara MN, Jiba DF, Kamara JB, Kpaka S, et al. The burden of serious fungal infections in Sierra Leone: a national estimate. Ther Adv Infect Dis. 2021. Jun 30; 8:20499361211027996. doi: 10.1177/20499361211027996 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lakoh S, Jiba DF, Adekanmbi O, Poveda E, Sahr F, Deen GF, Foray LM, Gashau W, Hoffmann CJ, Salata RA, Yendewa GA. Diagnosis and treatment outcomes of adult tuberculosis in an urban setting with high HIV prevalence in Sierra Leone: A retrospective study. Int J Infect Dis. 2020. Jul; 96:112–118. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.04.038 Epub 2020 Apr 24. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Lakoh S, Jiba DF, Baldeh M, Adekanmbi O, Barrie U, Seisay AL, et al. Impact of COVID-19 on Tuberculosis Case Detection and Treatment Outcomes in Sierra Leone. Trop Med Infect Dis. 2021. Aug 19;6(3):154. doi: 10.3390/tropicalmed6030154 ; PMCID: PMC8396336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.SSL 2015: Sierra Leone Population Census. [(accessed on 14 August 2022)]. Available online: https://www.statistics.sl/images/StatisticsSL/Documents/Census/2015/sl_2015_phc_thematic_report_on_pop_structure_and_pop_distribution.pdf.
  • 17.Hunter ES, Page ID, Richardson MD, Denning DW. Evaluation of the LDBio Aspergillus ICT lateral flow assay for serodiagnosis of allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis. PLoS One. 2020; 15(9):e0238855. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238855 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Piarroux RP, Romain T, Martin A, Vainqueur D, Vitte J, Lachaud L, et al. Multicenter Evaluation of a Novel Immunochromatographic Test for Anti-aspergillus IgG Detection. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2019. Jan 31; 9:12. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2019.00012 ; PMCID: PMC6365447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Osaigbovo II, Bongomin F. Point of care tests for invasive fungal infections: a blueprint for increasing availability in Africa. Ther Adv Infect Dis. 2021. Aug 16; 8:20499361211034266. doi: 10.1177/20499361211034266 ; PMCID: PMC8371725. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Borodulina EA, Piskun VV, Uraksina MV, Shubina AT. Molecular genetic tests GeneXpert MTB/RIF and Xpert MTB/RIF (Ultra) in the diagnosis of tuberculosis (review of literature). Klin Lab Diagn. 2022. Sep 12;67(9):544–549. English. doi: 10.51620/0869-2084-2022-67-9-544-549 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Faye B, Mbow M, Cheikh Seck M, Mbengue B, Wade D, Camara M, et al. Evaluation of PIMATM CD4 System for Decentralization of Immunological Monitoring of HIV-Infected Patients in Senegal. PLoS One. 2016. May 11;11(5):e0154000. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154000 ; PMCID: PMC4864219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Consolidated Guidelines on HIV Prevention, Diagnosis, Treatment and Care in Sierra Leone. Available at: https://www.nas.gov.sl/publication/164-consolidated-hiv-guidelines-on-hiv-prevention-october-2020 (accessed March 24, 2023)
  • 23.Denning DW, Page ID, Chakaya J, Jabeen K, Jude CM, Cornet M, et al. Case Definition of Chronic Pulmonary Aspergillosis in Resource-Constrained Settings. Emerg Infect Dis. 2018. Aug;24(8):e171312. doi: 10.3201/eid2408.171312 ; PMCID: PMC6056117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Mohamed A, Obanda BA, Njeri HK, Loroyokie SN, Mashedi OM, Ouko TT, et al. Serological evidence of chronic pulmonary Aspergillosis in tuberculosis patients in Kenya. BMC Infect Dis. 2022. Oct 25;22(1):798. doi: 10.1186/s12879-022-07782-9 ; PMCID: PMC9594872. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kosmidis C, Denning DW. The clinical spectrum of pulmonary aspergillosis. Thorax. 2015. Mar;70(3):270–7. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2014-206291 Epub 2014 Oct 29. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Lakoh S, Kamudumuli PS, Penney ROS, Haumba SM, Jarvis JN, Hassan AJ, et al. Diagnostic capacity for invasive fungal infections in advanced HIV disease in Africa: a continent-wide survey. Lancet Infect Dis. 2022. Dec 21: S1473–3099(22)00656–9. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00656-9 Epub ahead of print. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Mushi MF, Zaki SM, Penney ROS, Bamba B, Kuate MPN, Kasamba LE, et al. Diagnostic Options for Pulmonary Fungal Diseases in Africa. ERJ Open Res 2023;9(2):00397–2022. doi: 10.1183/23120541.00397-2022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Sapienza LG, Gomes MJ, Maliska C, Norberg AN. Hemoptysis due to fungus ball after tuberculosis: A series of 21 cases treated with hemostatic radiotherapy. BMC Infect Dis. 2015. Nov 26; 15:546. doi: 10.1186/s12879-015-1288-y ; PMCID: PMC4660718. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Jhun BW, Jeon K, Eom JS, Lee JH, Suh GY, Kwon OJ, et al. Clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of chronic pulmonary aspergillosis. Med Mycol. 2013. Nov;51(8):811–7. doi: 10.3109/13693786.2013.806826 Epub 2013 Jul 9. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Salzer HJ, Heyckendorf J, Kalsdorf B, Rolling T, Lange C. Characterization of patients with chronic pulmonary aspergillosis according to the new ESCMID/ERS/ECMM and IDSA guidelines. Mycoses. 2017. Feb;60(2):136–142. doi: 10.1111/myc.12589 Epub 2016 Dec 1. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ohba H, Miwa S, Shirai M, Kanai M, Eifuku T, Suda T, et al. Clinical characteristics and prognosis of chronic pulmonary aspergillosis. Respir Med. 2012. May;106(5):724–9. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2012.01.014 Epub 2012 Feb 19. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Denning DW, Cadranel J, Beigelman-Aubry C, Ader F, Chakrabarti A, Blot S, et al. ; European Society for Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases and European Respiratory Society. Chronic pulmonary aspergillosis: rationale and clinical guidelines for diagnosis and management. Eur Respir J. 2016. Jan;47(1):45–68. doi: 10.1183/13993003.00583-2015 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Denning DW, Cole DC, Ray A. New estimation of the prevalence of chronic pulmonary aspergillosis (CPA) related to pulmonary TB—a revised burden for India. IJID Reg. 2022. Nov 18;6:7–14. doi: 10.1016/j.ijregi.2022.11.005 ; PMCID: PMC9772841. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Lakoh S, Firima E, Jiba DF, Sesay M, Conteh MM, Deen GF. Low partner testing in high HIV prevalence setting in Freetown, Sierra Leone: a retrospective study. BMC Res Notes. 2019. Sep 24;12(1):629. doi: 10.1186/s13104-019-4662-9 ; PMCID: PMC6760048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Lakoh S, Jiba DF, Kanu JE, Poveda E, Salgado-Barreira A, Sahr F, et al. Causes of hospitalization and predictors of HIV-associated mortality at the main referral hospital in Sierra Leone: a prospective study. BMC Public Health. 2019. Oct 21;19(1):1320. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7614-3 ; PMCID: PMC6805411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Salzer HJF, Massango I, Bhatt N, Machonisse E, Reimann M, Heldt S, et al. Seroprevalence of Aspergillus-Specific IgG Antibody among Mozambican Tuberculosis Patients. J Fungi (Basel). 2021. Jul 23;7(8):595. doi: 10.3390/jof7080595 ; PMCID: PMC8396907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kwizera R, Musaazi J, Meya DB, Worodria W, Bwanga F, Kajumbula H, et al. Burden of fungal asthma in Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2019. May 16;14(5):e0216568. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216568 ; PMCID: PMC6521988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Kwizera R, Bongomin F, Olum R, Meya DB, Worodria W, Bwanga F, et al. Fungal asthma among Ugandan adult asthmatics. Med Mycol. 2021. Sep 3;59(9):923–933. doi: 10.1093/mmy/myab023 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Tiew PY, Thng KX, Chotirmall SH. Clinical Aspergillus Signatures in COPD and Bronchiectasis. J Fungi (Basel). 2022. May 5;8(5):480. doi: 10.3390/jof8050480 ; PMCID: PMC9146266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Garg M, Bhatia H, Chandra T, Debi U, Sehgal IS, Prabhakar N, et al. Imaging Spectrum in Chronic Pulmonary Aspergillosis. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2022. Nov 14;108(1):15–21. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.22-0366 ; PMCID: PMC9833062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011284.r001

Decision Letter 0

Marcio L Rodrigues, Chaoyang Xue

2 May 2023

Dear Dr. Lakoh,

Thank you very much for submitting your manuscript "Prevalence and predictors of Aspergillus seropositivity and chronic pulmonary aspergillosis in an urban tertiary hospital in Sierra Leone: a cross-sectional study" for consideration at PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases. As with all papers reviewed by the journal, your manuscript was reviewed by members of the editorial board and by several independent reviewers. The reviewers appreciated the attention to an important topic. Based on the reviews, we are likely to accept this manuscript for publication, providing that you modify the manuscript according to the review recommendations. When submitting the revision, please clearly address the comments from reviewer 1 in a point-to-point manner.

Please prepare and submit your revised manuscript within 30 days. If you anticipate any delay, please let us know the expected resubmission date by replying to this email.

When you are ready to resubmit, please upload the following:

[1] A letter containing a detailed list of your responses to all review comments, and a description of the changes you have made in the manuscript.

Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out

[2] Two versions of the revised manuscript: one with either highlights or tracked changes denoting where the text has been changed; the other a clean version (uploaded as the manuscript file).

Important additional instructions are given below your reviewer comments.

Thank you again for your submission to our journal. We hope that our editorial process has been constructive so far, and we welcome your feedback at any time. Please don't hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or comments.

Sincerely,

Chaoyang Xue, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Marcio Rodrigues

Section Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

***********************

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Key Review Criteria Required for Acceptance?

As you describe the new analyses required for acceptance, please consider the following:

Methods

-Are the objectives of the study clearly articulated with a clear testable hypothesis stated?

-Is the study design appropriate to address the stated objectives?

-Is the population clearly described and appropriate for the hypothesis being tested?

-Is the sample size sufficient to ensure adequate power to address the hypothesis being tested?

-Were correct statistical analysis used to support conclusions?

-Are there concerns about ethical or regulatory requirements being met?

Reviewer #1: In this work, Lakoh and colleagues have undertaken a study to assess the predictors of chronic pulmonary aspergillosis in Sierra Leone. The author's have tested Aspergillus seropositivity and CPA diagnosis defined by the GAFFI panel. The authors then used the demographic, clinical and radiographic variables for their utility as CPA predictors. The authors have identified current or prior TB as an independent predictor for CPA for their patient cohort in Sierra Leone.

Overall, the employed methods are sound, however, this reviewer wondered why other underlying conditions such as ABPA, asthma, pneumonia were also not considered in the authors' analyses. As it has been documented previously that the aforementioned conditions can be predisposing to CPA, can these conditions can also serve as predictors?

Reviewer #2: There are no concerns about the ethical or regulatory requirements being met and statistical analyses are correctly applied. The sample size collected was actually larger than required based on power analysis and the population of patients recruited is clearly described.

--------------------

Results

-Does the analysis presented match the analysis plan?

-Are the results clearly and completely presented?

-Are the figures (Tables, Images) of sufficient quality for clarity?

Reviewer #1: The authors have described the results succinctly, however, the tables are organized in a confusing way; for examples, if footnotes are provided regarding how the data are organized, that would help the readers. Furthermore, Table 3 requires corrections; it is missing values.

Reviewer #2: The analyses exactly match the proposed plan and all results are clearly described. The figure and tables are high quality and arrange the data logically.

--------------------

Conclusions

-Are the conclusions supported by the data presented?

-Are the limitations of analysis clearly described?

-Do the authors discuss how these data can be helpful to advance our understanding of the topic under study?

-Is public health relevance addressed?

Reviewer #1: The authors described current or prior TB as an independent predictor for CPA for their patient cohort, however, these findings are to be expected considering several previous studies that the authors have cited. The authors discuss their findings in light of the previous findings in Kenya, Ghana and Nigeria; however, it would have been helpful if the authors could discuss other chronic respiratory disorders, in addition to TB or non-tuberculous conditions, and their potential roles towards predicting TB.

Reviewer #2: The conclusions are clearly supported by the data presented and limitations and alternative interpretations are provided. The authors provide an excellent Discussion section addressing not only the interpretations of the data but also how it advances our understanding and what aspect will need to be further studied.

--------------------

Editorial and Data Presentation Modifications?

Use this section for editorial suggestions as well as relatively minor modifications of existing data that would enhance clarity. If the only modifications needed are minor and/or editorial, you may wish to recommend “Minor Revision” or “Accept”.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: None

--------------------

Summary and General Comments

Use this section to provide overall comments, discuss strengths/weaknesses of the study, novelty, significance, general execution and scholarship. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. If requesting major revision, please articulate the new experiments that are needed.

Reviewer #1: Overall, this study aims to characterize CPA prevalence and its predictors in Sierra Leone. In the light of increasing awareness towards fungal diseases, this study serves a critical unmet need; however, considering the previously established links between TB and CPA by multiple groups, the lack of novelty decreases this reviewer's enthusiasm.

Reviewer #2: The data were appropriately collected and well-described. The manuscript is well-written with clear interpretations of the data and alternatives are provided. Conclusions are supported by the data. This is a timely study reporting findings from an understudied area.

--------------------

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Figure Files:

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org.

Data Requirements:

Please note that, as a condition of publication, PLOS' data policy requires that you make available all data used to draw the conclusions outlined in your manuscript. Data must be deposited in an appropriate repository, included within the body of the manuscript, or uploaded as supporting information. This includes all numerical values that were used to generate graphs, histograms etc.. For an example see here: http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info:doi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.1001908#s5.

Reproducibility:

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option to publish peer-reviewed clinical study protocols. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols

References

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article's retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011284.r003

Decision Letter 1

Marcio L Rodrigues, Chaoyang Xue

14 May 2023

Dear Dr. Lakoh,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript 'Prevalence and predictors of Aspergillus seropositivity and chronic pulmonary aspergillosis in an urban tertiary hospital in Sierra Leone: a cross-sectional study' has been provisionally accepted for publication in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Before your manuscript can be formally accepted you will need to complete some formatting changes, which you will receive in a follow up email. A member of our team will be in touch with a set of requests.

Please note that your manuscript will not be scheduled for publication until you have made the required changes, so a swift response is appreciated.

IMPORTANT: The editorial review process is now complete. PLOS will only permit corrections to spelling, formatting or significant scientific errors from this point onwards. Requests for major changes, or any which affect the scientific understanding of your work, will cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript.

Should you, your institution's press office or the journal office choose to press release your paper, you will automatically be opted out of early publication. We ask that you notify us now if you or your institution is planning to press release the article. All press must be co-ordinated with PLOS.

Thank you again for supporting Open Access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Best regards,

Chaoyang Xue, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Marcio Rodrigues

Section Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

***********************************************************

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011284.r004

Acceptance letter

Marcio L Rodrigues, Chaoyang Xue

13 Jul 2023

Dear Dr. Lakoh,

We are delighted to inform you that your manuscript, "Prevalence and predictors of Aspergillus seropositivity and chronic pulmonary aspergillosis in an urban tertiary hospital in Sierra Leone: a cross-sectional study," has been formally accepted for publication in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

We have now passed your article onto the PLOS Production Department who will complete the rest of the publication process. All authors will receive a confirmation email upon publication.

The corresponding author will soon be receiving a typeset proof for review, to ensure errors have not been introduced during production. Please review the PDF proof of your manuscript carefully, as this is the last chance to correct any scientific or type-setting errors. Please note that major changes, or those which affect the scientific understanding of the work, will likely cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript. Note: Proofs for Front Matter articles (Editorial, Viewpoint, Symposium, Review, etc...) are generated on a different schedule and may not be made available as quickly.

Soon after your final files are uploaded, the early version of your manuscript will be published online unless you opted out of this process. The date of the early version will be your article's publication date. The final article will be published to the same URL, and all versions of the paper will be accessible to readers.

Thank you again for supporting open-access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Best regards,

Shaden Kamhawi

co-Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Paul Brindley

co-Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Data. SPSS data set for aspergillus seropositivity and chronic pulmonary aspergillosis.

    (SAV)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: PLOS NTD RESPONSE TO REVIEWERS 10.05.23.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES