Abstract
The Streptococcus mitis-oralis subgroup of viridans group streptococci are important human pathogens. We previously showed that a substantial portion of S. mitis-oralis strains (>25%) are ‘destined’ to develop rapid, high-level, and stable daptomycin (DAP) resistance (DAP-R) during DAP exposures in vitro. Such DAP-R is often accompanied by perturbations in distinct membrane phenotypes and metabolic pathways. The current study evaluated two S. oralis bloodstream isolates, 73 and 205. Strain 73 developed stable, high-level DAP-R (minimum inhibitory concentration [MIC] > 256 µg/mL) within 2 days of in vitro DAP passage (“high level” DAP-R [HLDR]). In contrast, strain 205 evolved low-level and unstable DAP-R (MIC = 8 µg/mL) under the same exposure conditions in vitro (“non-HLDR”). Comparing the parental 73 vs. 73-D2 (HLDR) strain-pair, we observed the 73-D2 had the following major differences: (i) altered cell membrane (CM) phospholipid profiles, featuring the disappearance of phosphatidylglycerol (PG) and cardiolipin (CL), with accumulation of the PG-CL pathway precursor, phosphatidic acid (PA); (ii) enhanced CM fluidity; (iii) increased DAP surface binding; (iv) reduced growth rates; (v) decreased glucose utilization and lactate accumulation; and (vi) increased enzymatic activity within the glycolytic (i.e., lactate dehydrogenase [LDH]) and lipid biosynthetic (glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase [GPDH]) pathways. In contrast, the 205 (non-HLDR) strain-pair did not show these same phenotypic or metabolic changes over the 2-day DAP exposure. WGS analyses confirmed the presence of mutations in genes involved in the above glycolytic and phospholipid biosynthetic pathways in the 73-D2 passage variant. These data suggest that S. oralis strains which are ‘destined’ to rapidly develop HLDR do so via a conserved cadre of genotypic, membrane phenotypic, and metabolic adaptations.
Keywords: high-level daptomycin resistance, S. oralis, lipids, glycolysis
1. Introduction
The viridans group streptococci (VGS), particularly the S. mitis/oralis subgroup, are important human pathogens in a variety of invasive endovascular infections, including “the toxic Strep shock syndrome” in neutropenic cancer patients and infective endocarditis (IE) [1,2,3,4,5]. The treatment of S. mitis/oralis infections has become difficult due to the relatively high prevalence of penicillin (~25%) and cephalosporin resistance, including to third generation agents [1]. In addition, S. mitis/oralis strains can exhibit vancomycin tolerance, further limiting therapeutic choices [6]. DAP has been proposed as a plausible alternative for severe infections caused by β-lactam-resistant S. mitis/oralis strains. However, Garcia-de-la-Maria et al. reported that >25% of ~100 DAP-susceptible (DAP-S) clinical bloodstream S. mitis/oralis strains were ‘destined’ to rapidly develop stable, high-level DAP-R (DAP MIC > 256 µg/mL) within 2 days of DAP exposure; this phenomenon has been confirmed by others in vitro and in simulated ex vivo IE models, as well as in vivo in experimental IE models [1]. Such rapid development of stable, rapid, and high-level DAP-R (HLDR) evolving upon DAP exposures has been rarely observed in other clinically important gram-positive pathogens (e.g., S. aureus and enterococci) [1,7].
We have previously reported on a plethora of potential mechanisms underlying HLDR in S. mitis/oralis [8,9,10], especially linked to key cell membrane (CM) events, including: selective and potentially ‘altruistic’ DAP hyper-accumulation among DAP-R cells; altered fluidity; enhanced surface charge; perturbations of key phospholipids (PLs) involved in DAP docking and its mechanism of action (i.e., PG and CL, correlated with mutations in cdsA or pgsA); and metabolic perturbations (e.g., in the glycolytic pathway) [11].
The current study was designed to build upon these latter studies, and specifically catalogue the above phenotypic perturbations, using two recent clinical isolates which appear destined to evolve either the HLDR or non-HLDR phenotype early (<2 d) following DAP exposures. In addition to the membrane and metabolic phenotypes noted above, we also assessed potential accumulations of relevant mutations during such short-term DAP passage in HLDR vs non-HLDR strains by whole genome sequencing (WGS).
Note: The term “DAP-resistance” (DAP-R) was used throughout the manuscript instead of “DAP-nonsusceptibility” for a more facile presentation.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Bacterial Strains
Two recent DAP-S clinical S. oralis bloodstream isolates (73 and 205) from patients with IE who were unexposed to DAP therapy were studied [1] (Table 1). These two strains were identified as S. mitis/oralis by MALDI-TOF VITEK® MS Biomerieux- Marcy-l’Étoile, France. MALDI-TOF cannot distinguish these two subspecies [12]; their subspeciation as S. oralis were defined by whole genome sequencing using metaphlan v3.1.0 [13].
Table 1.
S. oralis Strains |
DAP MIC (µg/mL) |
DAP MIC (Passaged in DAP Free Media for 5 Days) |
|
---|---|---|---|
73 | 0.5 | 0.5 | |
HLDR | 73-D2 | >256 * | >256 |
205 | 0.5 | 0.5 | |
Non-HLDR | 205-D2 | 8 ** | 2 |
* Stable DAP MIC in passage in DAP-free media; ** Unstable DAP MIC in passage in DAP-free media.
2.2. In Vitro DAP Passage
Both parental study isolates were subjected to short-term (2 d) in vitro DAP passage to select for DAP-R variants. Each DAP-S parental strain was cultured overnight in BHI broth (BHIB). An initial inoculum of OD600 = 1.00 [~108 CFU/mL] was then exposed to 20 µg/mL of DAP in BHIB + 50 µg/mL CaCl2. Surviving colonies were serially passaged for a 2-day period under the same conditions as above. Surviving colonies after each day’s passage were collected and stored at −80 °C for subsequent MIC testing. The 2 d post-passage isolates were then serially re-passaged for 5 days in antibiotic-free BHI media to determine the stability of DAP-R [8,9,10]. The DAP MICs of these DAP-passage and antibiotic-free post-passage strains were determined by broth microdilution assay (see below). A minimum of three independent experiments were performed on separate days to analyze the MIC data.
2.3. Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations (MICs)
DAP was obtained from Merck & Co., Inc. (Whitehouse Station, NJ, USA). DAP MIC testing was carried out by the CLSI-recommended broth microdilution techniques, with 50 µg/mL of CaCl2 added to BHIB (Difco, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). In addition, BHI agar supplemented with 5% lysed horse blood (Difco, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) was used to quantify agar plate colony counts. There are no formal CLSI-recommended DAP breakpoints for VGS strains; however, streptococcal strains with DAP MICs ≥ 2 µg/mL are considered as DAP-R [1,8,9,10]. A minimum of three independent runs were performed on different days, with the average MIC reported herein.
2.4. Phenotypic Assays
2.4.1. Surface Charge
The relative positive cell surface charge of the study strains was determined using the standard cytochrome C (Cyt C) binding assay as described previously [8,9]. Briefly, stationary phase cells were pelleted by centrifugation, washed with MOPS (3-morpholinopropane1-sulfonic acid) buffer (pH 7.0), resuspended in the same buffer at OD578 ≈ 1.0, and incubated with 0.5 mg/mL of the highly cationic Cyt C for 10 min. Then, the residual quantity of Cyt C remaining in the bacterial supernatant was determined spectrophotometrically at OD530 nm [8,9]. A decrease in the quantity of Cyt C binding (i.e., more cation in the supernate) equates to a greater positively charged bacterial surface [8,9]. The quantified data are presented as an average (±SD) of unbound Cyt C. A minimum of three independent experimental runs were performed on different days. Further, as a confirmatory surface charge quantification, a fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-labeled poly-l-lysine (PLL) binding assay was performed using flow cytometry (FACS Calibur®; Beckman Instruments, Alameda, CA, USA), as reported before [8,9]. Data were represented as mean fluorescent units ± SDs. Decreased PLL binding was correlated with the more positively charged S. oralis surface [8,9]. At least three independent runs were performed on separate days.
2.4.2. CM Fluidity
Bacterial strains were grown in BHIB overnight at 37 °C, washed with PBS and adjusted to an OD600 = 1.0 (≈108 CFU/ mL) as before. Fluidity measurements were carried out by using the fluorescent probe, 1,6-diphenyl-1,3,5-hexatriene (DPH; excitation and emission wavelengths = 360 nm and 426 nm, respectively). Polarization spectrofluorimetry was used to quantify fluorescence polarization (horizontal vs vertical) and to define the polarization index (PI) value as before (LS50 Perkin-Elmer, Valencia, CA, USA) [8,9]. An inverse correlation exists between PI value and fluidity (i.e., a lower PI value equates to a higher extent of CM fluidity) [8,9]. Three independent experiments were conducted on separate days.
2.4.3. CM Phospholipid (PL) Composition
The protocol for PL extractions has been described elsewhere [8,9]. S. mitis/oralis CMs consist of three major PLs, i.e., phosphatidic acid (PA; the major precursor molecule within the cardiolipin [CL] biosynthetic pathway [8,9]) phosphatidylglycerol (PG); and cardiolipin (CL). These three major PLs were separated, and their relative proportionality determined by two-dimensional thin-layer chromatography (2D-TLC), using a unique solvent system as detailed before [8,9]. All PL spots on TLC plates were identified (as compared to known PL standards) using iodine vapor exposure and by spraying with CuSO4 (100 mg/mL) containing 8% phosphoric acid (v/v) and heated at 180 °C [8,9]. Each identified PL spot from TLC plates was scraped and digested at 180 °C for 3 h with 0.3 mL 70% perchloric acid into the inorganic form of phosphate. The relative biochemical quantification of each PL was determined spectrophotometrically at OD660 [8,9]. Data represented the mean (±SD) percentages of the three major PLs (PA + PG + CL = 100%). All S. mitis oralis strains contain a major glycolipid species visible on TLC plates, the analysis of which is not included in our quantifications [8,9]. A minimum of three independent experiments were performed on separate days.
2.4.4. Lipidomics Analyses by Mass Spectrometry
To confirm the above 2D-TLC assays, as well as to identify additional PLs-of-interest, formal lipodomic assays were carried out. Pelleted and washed cells from overnight growth of the study strains (parental and 2-day DAP passage) were transferred to extraction tubes with PBS. A modified Bligh and Dyer extraction method was used to extract lipid samples [14]. Prior to extraction, an internal standard mixture consisting of 70 lipid standards across 17 subclasses was added to each sample (AB Sciex 5,040,156, Avanti 330,827, Avanti 330,830, Avanti 330,828, Avanti 791,642). Following two consecutive extractions, pooled organic layers were dried down in a Thermo Speed Vac SPD300DDA using ramp setting 4 at 35 °C for 45 min with a total run time of 90 min. Lipid samples were then resuspended in 1:1 methanol/dichloromethane with 10 mM ammonium acetate and transferred to robovials (Thermo 10,800,107) for analysis. Samples were analyzed by direct infusion on a Sciex 5500 with a Differential Mobility Device (DMS) (comparable to a Sciex Lipidyzer platform) with a targeted acquisition list consisting of 1450 lipid species across 17 subclasses. The DMS was tuned with EquiSPLASH LIPIDOMIX (Avanti 330,731). Data analysis was performed with in-house data analysis workflow. Instrument settings, MRM lists, and analysis methods are available [15]. Quantitative values were normalized to cell counts. Pilot lipidomic analyses have identified several key lipid species in S. mitis oralis strains in addition to PG and PA, including diacylglycerol (DAG), triacylglycerol (TAG), phosphatidylcholine (PC), phosphatidylethanolamine (PE), phosphatidylinositol (PI), phosphatidylserine (PS), free fatty acids (FFAs), ceramides (Cer d18:1), dihydroceramides (Cer d18:0), hexosylceramides (HexCER), lactosylceramides (LacCER), cholesterol esters (CE), and sphingomyelin (SM). The Sciex 5500 lipidomics platform was not able to detect the CL metabolite because of its higher mass, as well as the detection limit of the instrument.
2.4.5. Quantification of DAP Binding
Binding of DAP to whole cells was assessed spectrofluorometrically, using a fluorescent BODIPY-DAP binding assay [16]. A bacterial inoculum of 1.0 × 106 CFU/mL was exposed to 5 μM of BODIPY-DAP, and then incubated in the dark at room temperature for 20 min. BODIPY-DAP fluorescence intensity was measured employing spectrofluorometry (excitation wavelength = 488 nm; emission wavelength = 530 nm). Because the antimicrobial potency of BODIPY-tagged DAP is ~4-fold lower than that of standard, unbound DAP, the DAP exposure concentrations used for these binding assays were calculated to be ~4-fold higher than the average free human serum therapeutic DAP level of 3.6 ug/mL [16].
2.5. Metabolic Assays
We have previously reported on the relationship of perturbations within the glycolytic pathway and DAP-R in S. mitis/oralis strains [11]. We, thus, carried out a series of assays relative to this pathway to further define these metrics in our parental vs. 2-day DAP-passage variants. These assays involved both measurements of key biometabolites and quantitative enzymatic activity relative to the glycolytic pathway.
2.5.1. Cultivation Conditions
For selective metabolic and biochemical assays below, study isolates were grown in BHIB supplemented with 2 µg/mL D-glucose (BHI + glucose) or on blood agar plates (VWR Scientific, Radnor, PA, USA). For all studies, S. oralis pre-cultures were inoculated (1:10) from overnight cultures into 50 mL of BHI in 50 mL conical tubes and incubated at 37 °C without shaking for 4 h.
2.5.2. Measurement of Growth Rates
The exponential growth phase pre-cultures of S. oralis strains were collected by centrifugation at 4000 rpm at 22 °C and suspended in 1 mL of culture medium. Primary cultures were inoculated into 50 mL (BHI +/− glucose) within 50 mL conical tubes to an absorbance at 600 nm (A600) of 0.16 and incubated at 37 °C without shaking. S. oralis strain cultures were mixed by inversion every 30 min prior to sampling. The growth rate (A600) of the S. oralis strains were recorded every 60 min for 5 h. Based on our prior published time-dependent metabolic outcome metrics in other S. mitis/oralis strains [11,17], we selected these early growth time-points for evaluating growth rates, as well as for the metabolic and biochemical assays outlined below [11,17].
2.5.3. Determination of Glucose, Lactate, Ammonium, and Acetate Concentrations in Cultivation Media
Cell-free media were harvested hourly during the growth rate studies above by centrifugation, transferred to 1.5 mL microcentrifuge tubes, and stored at −20 °C until further use. The above four glycolytic metabolite concentrations in the hourly culture media were measured from three biological replicates each, using their respective quantification kits purchased from R-Biopharm (Washington, MO, USA). Three independent assays were carried out to measure these biometabolite concentrations.
2.5.4. Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH) and Glycerol-3-Phosphate Dehydrogenase (GPDH) Enzymatic Assays
Strains were cultivated as detailed above, and cells were then collected hourly by centrifugation and disrupted using Fast Prep (FP120 Thermo Savant). Cell debris in the supernates was discarded after centrifugation. The cell-free lysates were then utilized to measure the enzymatic activity of LDH and GPDH after suspension in 100 µL LDH assay buffer (Sigma-Aldrich MAK066 Kit, Burlington, VT, USA). Activities of LDH and GPDH were determined from three independent biological replicates. Protein concentrations were measured using the Bradford protein assay (Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).
2.6. Genotypic Assay
2.6.1. Whole Genome Sequencing
Prior to DNA extraction for sequencing, bacterial inocula were prepared by growing the bacterial cultures overnight in 10 mL of Brain Heart Infusion broth at 37 °C with agitation. A total of 2 mL of the overnight bacterial cultures were then harvested by centrifugation at 10,000× g for 10 min, and the resulting bacterial pellets were washed twice with sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) to remove any residual medium. The bacterial pellets were then resuspended in lysis buffer provided in the kit and incubated at 56 °C for 30 min with gentle shaking to facilitate cell lysis and release of DNA. Subsequently, DNA was purified and eluted using the QIAGEN DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (QIAGEN Inc., Valencia, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The extracted DNA was quantified using a spectrophotometer and stored at −20 °C until further use. Mutations are the eventual source of heritable variation for evolution. Emergence of DAP-R in these strains upon DAP exposures might be related to selecting out pre-existing DAP-R sub-populations, rather than the acquisition of DAP-R genes. In this study, the identification of mutations was carried out using Snippy v.4.6.0, a rapid haploid variant calling pipeline. To minimize the inclusion of false variant calls, several filtering parameters were applied to the samples. These parameters included: (i) minimum coverage of 10 reads; (ii) minimum variant call quality of 100; (iii) minimum map quality of 60 to be sure that the read was uniquely mapped, avoiding potential duplicates; and (iv) minimum quality for the nucleotide was 20, representing an error probability of ~1%.
2.6.2. Genome Assembly
ONT libraries were prepared using the rapid barcode sequencing kit (RBK110.96), and Illumina libraries were prepared using the Illumina Nextera Flex DNA library kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). Samples were sequenced in both Oxford Nanopore MinION mk1c long-read (ONT) and Illumina NextSeq 2000 150PE short-read sequencing platforms. After sequencing, all reads were trimmed for quality: (i) Q > 8 for ONT reads; and (ii) Q > 25 for Illumina short reads using Guppy basecaller v6.4.8 and Trimmomatic v0.39 [18]. Genome assembly was first performed using ONT-only reads using Flye v2.9 [19] with default parameters. Resulting draft genomes were then submitted to a base-call error correction polishing step using NextPolish v1.4.1 [20]. Genome statistics were calculated by QUAST v5 [21].
2.6.3. Taxon Identification
All trimmed reads were submitted to Metaphlan v3.1.0 [13] for taxon identification using the rel_ab_w_read_stats flag to profile relative abundances and estimate the number of reads coming from each clade if a mixed sample was found. The results were then visualized using Krona v.2.8.1 [22].
2.6.4. Resistome
Assembled genomes were submitted to Abricate v1.0.1 (https://github.com/tseemann/ABRicate, accessed on 5 April 2023) to check for the potential presence of resistance genes in each sample. Variant analysis. Raw short-reads from each sample generated in the Illumina machine were first trimmed for quality > Q25. They were then submitted to snippy v4.4.5 (https://github.com/tseemann/snippy, accessed on 5 April 2023) using as reference the S. oralis ATCC 35037 genome (GCF_900637025.1). The resulting vcf file was then annotated using a custom database from the same used reference in SnpEff v4.3 [23]. Tables were generated using Snpsift and compared using custom bash scripts and visualized in Venny v2.1 (https://bioinfogp.cnb.csic.es/tools/venny/, 5 April 2023).
2.7. Statistical Analysis
Means and standard deviations (SDs) were determined for all variables. Differences between CM phenotypic and metabolic biochemical assay metrics were analyzed using the two-tailed Student t test. p values of ≤0.05 were considered as ‘significant’.
3. Results
3.1. CM Phenotypic Characteristics of HLDR vs. Non-HLDR S. oralis Strains
3.1.1. Emergence of HLDR and Non-HLDR Variants by In Vitro DAP Passage
DAP-S parental strains 73 and 205 were passaged in vitro in DAP for 2 d to derive DAP-R variants (DAP MIC ≥ 2 µg/mL). Strain 73 post-passage (73-D2) exhibited a DAP MIC > 256 µg/mL; in contrast, strain 205 post-passage (205-D2) had a DAP MIC = 8 µg/mL (Table 1). We termed these two strains, HLDR and non-HLDR, respectively. Further, both strains 73-D2 and 205-D2 were evaluated for the stability of DAP-R, following serial passage in DAP-free media for 5 days. Strain 73-D2 showed a stably high DAP MIC (i.e., MIC > 256 µg/mL), while strain 205-D2 exhibited an unstable DAP MIC (i.e., MIC was reduced to 2 µg/mL following passage in antibiotic-free media). Of interest, when each parental strain was passaged in vitro in DAP for a total of 10 d, both strains 73 and 205 evolved high-level (MIC > 256 ug/mL) and stable DAP-R (data not shown).
3.1.2. Cell Surface Charge
DAP-R S. aureus, enterococci, and some S. mitis/oralis strains often exhibit a relatively more positive surface charge than their respective DAP-S parental strains [8,9,16,24,25]. Surprisingly, moderately decreased amounts of cytochrome C were observed in the 73-D2 vs. 73 parental strain supernates, indicating a potentially decreased surface positive charge; in contrast, this phenotype was unaltered in comparing the 205-D2 vs its parental strain (Table 2). The PLL binding assay was performed to confirm the above surface charge data of these strain-sets; the net surface charge by this assay did not significantly differ among passage variants vs. their respective parental strains (data not shown). Thus, taken together, passage in DAP did not appear to substantially impact surface charge in either strain-pair.
Table 2.
S. oralis Strains | CM Fluidity: PI Value (Mean ± SD) |
Surface Charge: % of Cyt C in Supernatant (Mean ± SD) |
BODIPY-DAP Binding: Fluorescence Intensity (Mean ± SD) |
---|---|---|---|
73 | 0.298 ± 0.01 | 76 ± 3 | 553 ± 28 |
73-D2 | 0.271 ± 0.01 * | 61 ± 1 * | 592 ± 17 * |
205 | 0.268 ± 0.01 | 62 ± 8 | 405 ± 3 |
205-D2 | 0.269 ± 0.01 | 58 ± 7 | 430 ± 24 |
Data represent the mean (±SD) of three independent experiments on different days. Statistical significance (*) for D2 strains relative to their HLDR and non-HLDR parental strains were assessed using Student’s t-test (p ≤ 0.05). * p < 0.05 D2 vs. respective parental strains. An increased amount of cytC in the supernatant correlates to a greater positively charged bacterial surface; a lower PI value equates to a higher degree of CM fluidity.
3.1.3. CM Fluidity
As shown in Table 2, the DAP-R 73-D2 strain displayed significantly more fluid CMs vs. its DAP-S 73 parental strain. In contrast, the 205 strain-pair did not differ in CM fluidity metrics.
3.1.4. DAP Binding
Whole cell DAP binding assays showed modestly higher binding in both DAP-R strains, although only reaching significance for the 73 strain-pair (Table 2).
3.1.5. Quantitative Measurements of PL Contents by 2D-TLC and Lipidomics Analyses
As reported before for other S. mitis/oralis strains [8,9,10,25], three major PL species (PG, CL, and PA) were identified by 2D-TLC in both DAP-S 73 and 205 parental strains; CL was the dominant species in both DAP-S parental strains. In the DAP-R 73-D2 strain, PG and CL were undetectable, with only the PG-CL pathway precursor, PA, detected (Table 3; Supplementary Figure S1). In contrast, the 205 strain-pair did not show major alterations in PG and CL content, with only a modest enhancement of PA content (Table 3; Supplementary Figure S1).
Table 3.
% of PL Species (Mean ± SD) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Strains | PG | CL | PA |
73 | 18 ± 8 | 52 ± 4 | 31 ± 10 |
73-D2 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 100 ± 0 * |
205 | 29 ± 22 | 67 ± 19 | 4 ± 4 |
205-D2 | 18 ± 7 | 68 ± 6 | 15 ± 5 * |
Data represent the mean (±SD) of three independent experiments. Statistical differences for D2 strains relative to their HLDR and non-HLDR parental strains were determined by Student’s t-test; * p < 0.05 D2 vs. respective parental strains. PG= phosphatidylglycerol; CL = cardiolipin; PA = phosphatidic acid.
Further, mass spectrometry-based lipidomic analyses confirmed these alterations of PL patterns appearing on 2D-TLC and identified additional lipid species-of-interest differentiating these two strain-sets. Thus, similar to the 2D-TLC assays, lipidomic analysis confirmed a major alteration of PL profiles (particularly, in terms of very reduced PG levels, with a compensatory increase in levels of the precursor molecule, PA) in the 73-D2 vs. its 73 parental strain. Moreover, paralleling the 2D-TLC assays in comparing the 205-parental and 205-D2 strain-pair, both the PG and PA species contents were present and readily quantifiable (Figure 1). It should be noted that our lipidomic analysis was not able to identify and quantity CL, due to the limit of detection of our instrument related to the higher degree of mass value of this PL species. However, since CL is a dimer of the PG molecule, it is reasonable to assume that the near-disappearance of PG on lipidomics would translate closely into a very reduced CL content in the 73-D2 strain (as seen in the 2D-TLC assays).
Diacylglycerol (DAG) is the principal intermediate of the CL biosynthetic pathway (Supplementary Figure S3). Increased DAG content was observed in 73-D2 vs. its 73 parental strain, but it was not significantly altered in the 205 strain-pair. Lipidomics also revealed significantly reduced content of several other lipid species (i.e., phosphatidyl ethanolamine [PE], ceramides, sphingomyelin [SM], and free fatty acids [FFA]) in 73-D2 vs. the parental 73 strain; the patterns of these lipid species were not significantly altered in the 205 strain-set. In addition, increased content of phosphatidyl serine (PS) was observed in the 73-D2 vs. the 73 parental strain, but not in the 205 strain-pair. Of interest, phosphatidylcholine (PC) content was almost negligible in the 73 strain-pair, but it was increased in the 205-D2 vs. 205 parental strain (Supplementary Figures S2A–C).
4. Metabolic-Biochemical Profiles of HLDR Vs. Non-HLDR S. oralis Strains
4.1. Growth Profiles
The transition from DAP-S to DAP-R on DAP exposures has been previously correlated with alterations in growth rates and growth yields in both S. aureus and selected S. mitis-oralis strains [11,26]. We, thus, measured the early growth profiles of our strain-pairs (Figure 2). As expected, the 73-D2 strain exhibited a significantly decreased early growth rate vs. its 73 parental strain (between 3 and 5 h) (Figure 2); such differences were not observed in comparing early growth curves of the 205 strain-pair (Figure 2).
4.1.1. Glucose/Pyruvate Catabolism
Prior studies have linked the emergence of DAP-R in S. mitis/oralis strains with perturbations in the glycolytic pathway [11]. To investigate if the glycolytic pathway signatures of the DAP-R 73-D2 vs. 205-D2 strains differed (vs. their respective parental strains), both glucose consumption and lactate accumulation were quantified over the same early growth period as noted above (0–5 h; Figure 3). As expected, the DAP-R 73-D2 strain utilized less glucose than its parental 73 strain, coincident with its relatively slower early growth rates (Figure 3); this was accompanied by decreased lactate accumulation in the culture medium over this same time period (Figure 3). In contrast, neither glucose utilization nor lactate accumulation were altered significantly in comparing the DAP-R 205-D2 vs. its parental 205 strain over this same time period.
4.1.2. Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH) Activity
In the glycolytic pathway, the end-product is pyruvate, which in S. mitis/oralis strains is then further catabolized by membrane-associated LDH into lactate [27]. Although not reaching statistical significance, there was an obvious trend towards increasing LDH activity during the early growth period (2–5 h) in the DAP-R 73-D2 strain vs. its parental DAP-S 73 strain, which was not observed in the 205 strain-pair (Figure 4).
4.1.3. Glycerol-3-Phosphate Dehydrogenase (GPDH) Activity
GPDH serves as a major link between glucose and lipid metabolic pathways (Figure 3). The GPDH activity was substantially increased in DAP-R strain 73-D2 vs its respective parental strain over the same early growth period as noted above (2–5 h) to levels exceeding those seen in DAP-R strain 205-D2 (Figure 5).
4.1.4. Measurement of Acetate and Ammonium in Culture
We recently showed that selected DAP-R S. mitis/oralis strains exhibited significantly altered patterns of acetate and amino acid metabolism [11]. The secretion of acetate and deamination of amino acids can cause the respective accumulation of acetate and ammonium in culture medium during bacterial growth [11,26,28]; moreover, acid accumulation in the medium lowers pH, and can itself inhibit growth [26,28]. Thus, growth media concentrations of acetate and ammonium were measured for both strain-pairs; the accumulation profiles of both acetate and ammonia were unaltered in either strain-pair (Figure 6).
5. Genotypic Profiling by WGS
We have previously shown that loss-of-function mutations in key PL biosynthetic genes (such as cdsA and pgsA) mediate the HLDR phenotype in selected S. mitis/oralis strains [8,9,10]. In this investigation, to better understand the genetic correlates of HLDR vs. non-HLDR phenotypes, we performed WGS, comparing D2 passage isolates vs. their respective parental strains (Table 4 and Table 5; Supplementary Table S1). WGS analyses identified mutations in 51 and 57 gene products in the HLDR 73-D2 strain and the non-HLDR 205-D2 strain, respectively, as compared to each parental strain. For example, and relevant to our phenotypic and metabolic metrics, non-synonymous mutations were found in several genes involved in both glucose and PL metabolism in the 73-D2 strain vs. its parental 73 strain (e.g., ldh and pap2 = Thr28Asn, Ile194Val and Ser90Cys, respectively; Table 4). Further, non-HLDR 205-D2 had mutations in genes also involved in PL metabolism (i.e., gpdh and pgsA), resulting in amino acid changes (i.e., Val137Leu and Ala123del, respectively).
Table 4.
Predicted Amino Acid Change a | Predicted Protein Function | Gene ID |
---|---|---|
Val876Ile | LPXTG-anchored beta-N-acetylhexosaminidase StrH | gene-EL140_RS00270 |
Lys3Glu | PspC domain-containing protein | gene-EL140_RS00510 |
Lys175Gly | DUF1307 domain-containing protein | gene-EL140_RS02430 |
Lys144Gln | response regulator transcription factor VncR | gene-EL140_RS02580 |
Thr131Ser, Lys135Val | rRNA pseudouridine synthase | gene-EL140_RS01050 |
Lys320Asn | glucosaminidase domain-containing protein | gene-EL140_RS03645 |
2_5delATGGTinsTGGCa, Lys6Gln | tagatose-bisphosphate aldolase | gene-EL140_RS04205 |
Arg518Ser, Val527Leu | glycoside hydrolase family 13 protein | gene-EL140_RS04725 |
Ile131Val | ABC transporter permease | gene-EL140_RS00390 |
Ile27Met | hypothetical protein | gene-EL140_RS00190 |
Thr28Asn, Ile194Val | L-lactate dehydrogenase | gene-EL140_RS05540 |
Ser134Gly | hypothetical protein | gene-EL140_RS00190 |
66delAa | Fe-S cluster assembly protein SufB | gene-EL140_RS05570 |
Lys1240Asp | Cna B-type domain-containing protein | gene-EL140_RS05785 |
Gly71fs | YdbC family protein | gene-EL140_RS05795 |
Ser522Leu | ABC transporter ATP-binding protein/permease | gene-EL140_RS00650 |
Gln569Glu | aminodeoxychorismate synthase component I | gene-EL140_RS06465 |
Leu60Pro | response regulator | gene-EL140_RS06480 |
Ser242Thr | ammonia-dependent NAD(+) synthetase | gene-EL140_RS06505 |
Leu417Gln | YSIRK-type signal peptide-containing protein | gene-EL140_RS06920 |
Val144Ala | MarR family transcriptional regulator | gene-EL140_RS01740 |
2652delGACATinsAACACa | valine—tRNA ligase | gene-EL140_RS07795 |
Ile1380Thr | YSIRK-type signal peptide-containing protein | gene-EL140_RS06920 |
GlnAla68GluLeu | phosphoribulokinase | gene-EL140_RS08745 |
Cys610Gly | magnesium-translocating P-type ATPase | gene-EL140_RS08825 |
Cys104Ser | GH92 family glycosyl hydrolase | gene-EL140_RS09195 |
TyrLys427PheGlu | cell surface protein | gene-EL140_RS09325 |
Ala900Gly, Ala918Val, Ala912Val, Phe461Leu, Asp456Asn | LPXTG cell wall anchor domain-containing protein | gene-EL140_RS06375 |
Asn82Ser | DUF6261 family protein | gene-EL140_RS09590 |
Lys292Asn, Ala298Gln | LPXTG cell wall anchor domain-containing protein | gene-EL140_RS06375 |
Ile99Val, Ala249Ser | methyltransferase domain-containing protein | gene-EL140_RS00590 |
Lys192Asn | hemolysin family protein | gene-EL140_RS01300 |
Thr68Met | endonuclease MutS2 | gene-EL140_RS01700 |
Met44Val | hypothetical protein | gene-EL140_RS00190 |
Ile166Ser | N-acetylmuramoyl-L-alanine amidase | gene-EL140_RS02630 |
Arg68Gly, Glu72Asp | GDSL-type esterase/lipase family protein | gene-EL140_RS03180 |
His4Tyr | Nramp family divalent metal transporter | gene-EL140_RS03335 |
ArgLysGly154LysAlaGlu, Glu308fs, Ala2Val, Gln6Asn | tagatose-6-phosphate kinase | gene-EL140_RS04200 |
Asn240Asp | pneumococcal-type histidine triad protein | gene-EL140_RS04260 |
Asp61Tyr, Val70Ala | HNH endonuclease | gene-EL140_RS04615 |
Leu229Ile | hypothetical protein | gene-EL140_RS00190 |
Phe125Leu, Thr105Pro | hypothetical protein | gene-EL140_RS00190 |
Ile110Met | nicotinate phosphoribosyltransferase | gene-EL140_RS06510 |
Ser755Thr, Gln681Glu | G5 domain-containing protein | gene-EL140_RS06930 |
Asn624Glu | penicillin-binding protein PBP2B | gene-EL140_RS07010 |
Asn861Ser | antigen I/II family LPXTG-anchored adhesin | gene-EL140_RS07990 |
Thr33Ala, Asp35Gly | ABC transporter permease | gene-EL140_RS00390 |
Pro1264Leu | glycoside hydrolase N-terminal domain-containing protein | gene-EL140_RS08115 |
Glu379Asp | penicillin-binding protein PBP2X | gene-EL140_RS08125 |
Ser90Cys | phosphatase PAP2 family protein | gene-EL140_RS01360 |
Glu871Asp | DNA-directed RNA polymerase subunit beta’ | gene-EL140_RS08440 |
a: Number refers to nucleotide position; fs—frameshift.
Table 5.
Predicted Amino Acid Change a | Predicted Protein Function | Gene ID |
---|---|---|
Glu144Gln | tagatose-bisphosphate aldolase | gene-EL140_RS04205 |
Glu458Asp | fibronectin-binding SSURE repeat-containing protein | gene-EL140_RS00420 |
Lys3Glu | PspC domain-containing protein | gene-EL140_RS00510 |
Met6Leu | ribonuclease M5 | gene-EL140_RS01180 |
Asn331Gln, Val2276Leu, His/Lys331Gln | accessory Sec-dependent serine-rich glycoprotein adhesin | gene-EL140_RS01855 |
leu51Met, Ser151Ala, Arg165Lys | serine O-acetyltransferase | gene-EL140_RS02135 |
Asn8Asp | nucleoside phosphorylase | gene-EL140_RS00405 |
Asp43Glu | DUF1307 domain-containing protein | gene-EL140_RS02430 |
Arg6Trp | DUF6287 domain-containing protein | gene-EL140_RS02620 |
599insAT | N-acetylmuramoyl-L-alanine amidase | gene-EL140_RS02630 |
Ile53Val, His139Arg, Ser690Phe, Leu694Val | heavy metal translocating P-type ATPase | gene-EL140_RS00600 |
Asn295Ser | hypothetical protein | gene-EL140_RS00190 |
Gln992His | carbamoyl-phosphate synthase large subunit | gene-EL140_RS03330 |
Glu438ins, GluGlnPro439HisProThr | DNA primase | gene-EL140_RS03860 |
Arg51His, AspGln566GlyLeu, Val570Ala | glycoside hydrolase family 13 protein | gene-EL140_RS04725 |
Glu229Lys | YjjG family noncanonical pyrimidine nucleotidase | gene-EL140_RS04975 |
Asn142Asp | SUF system NifU family Fe-S cluster assembly protein | gene-EL140_RS05575 |
Ala17Val | aminoglycoside 6-adenylyltransferase | gene-EL140_RS05640 |
Phe93Cys | VanZ family protein | gene-EL140_RS05855 |
Glu47Lys | UPF0223 family protein | gene-EL140_RS06150 |
Asp65Glu | SDR family oxidoreductase | gene-EL140_RS06415 |
Val294Ile | ribonuclease Z | gene-EL140_RS06420 |
LeuAla83LeuThr, GlyLeu86AlaIle | hypothetical protein | gene-EL140_RS00190 |
Asn350Lys | G5 domain-containing protein | gene-EL140_RS06930 |
Ser824Asn, Thr1012Asn, Thr843Ile, Thr820Asn | G5 domain-containing protein | gene-EL140_RS06930 |
Val1055Ala | exo-alpha-sialidase | gene-EL140_RS07065 |
Val138Met | DUF421 domain-containing protein | gene-EL140_RS07435 |
Asp1472Glu | glycoside hydrolase N-terminal domain-containing protein | gene-EL140_RS08115 |
Asp871Glu | DNA-directed RNA polymerase subunit beta’ | gene-EL140_RS08440 |
Cys610Gly | magnesium-translocating P-type ATPase | gene-EL140_RS08825 |
Met267Ile | D-alanyl-lipoteichoic acid biosynthesis protein DltD | gene-EL140_RS09230 |
Arg74Ser | hypothetical protein | gene-EL140_RS00190 |
Ala862Thr | LPXTG cell wall anchor domain-containing protein | gene-EL140_RS06375 |
Val137Leu | NAD(P)H-dependent glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase | gene-EL140_RS00645 |
Thr718Ala | HAD-IC family P-type ATPase | gene-EL140_RS01060 |
LysValLeuValGly150AsnAlaLeuThrIle, Ala159Ser | sugar transferase | gene-EL140_RS01435 |
IleAspLeu211ValAlaIle | metal ABC transporter ATP-binding protein | gene-EL140_RS02210 |
Asn117Ser | DNA/RNA non-specific endonuclease | gene-EL140_RS01295 |
Leu6Gln | NAD-dependent protein deacylase | gene-EL140_RS03745 |
Asp74His | nucleotidyltransferase | gene-EL140_RS01975 |
Gly14Ala | MBL fold metallo-hydrolase | gene-EL140_RS02220 |
Lys12Gln | MmcQ/YjbR family DNA-binding protein | gene-EL140_RS05435 |
Ala177Val | DNA topology modulation protein | gene-EL140_RS05725 |
AsnLeu84ThrIle | prephenate dehydrogenase | gene-EL140_RS06020 |
Asn78Ser, Thr72Ala | inositol monophosphatase family protein | gene-EL140_RS06145 |
His772Asn, Asn770Tyr, Arg768Gln | Ltp family lipoprotein | gene-EL140_RS06460 |
AlaAspVal352ValAlaIle | sensor histidine kinase | gene-EL140_RS01655 |
Val24Glu | response regulator | gene-EL140_RS06480 |
Phe200Tyr | Nif3-like dinuclear metal center hexameric protein | gene-EL140_RS06860 |
Ter295Lysext a,* | ROK family protein | gene-EL140_RS02070 |
Ala120Val, ThrIle109LeuLeu | ABC transporter permease | gene-EL140_RS00390 |
Ser1567Thr, GlyThrGlyAla1549SerThrAsnVal | YSIRK-type signal peptide-containing protein | gene-EL140_RS06920 |
Ala22Thr | 50S ribosomal protein L23 | gene-EL140_RS08720 |
GluLeu68GlnAla, Val65Ile, Asn60Glu | phosphoribulokinase | gene-EL140_RS08745 |
Ala123del | CDP-diacylglycerol—glycerol-3-phosphate 3-phosphatidyltransferase | gene-EL140_RS09460 |
Pro15Leu | AraC family transcriptional regulator | gene-EL140_RS05010 |
Met1fs | hypothetical protein | gene-EL140_RS00190 |
a: Numbers refer to amino acid position; * protein sequence extension; fs—frameshift.
Lastly, genetic mutations were shared in 11 gene products in comparing HLDR 73-D2 and non-HLDR 205-D2 (Supplementary Table S1). Both DAP-R variants shared the same Lys3Glu mutation in a PspC domain-containing protein and a Cys610Gly mutation in a magnesium-translocating P-type ATPase. In two instances, one variant was noted in VGS73-D2, while VGS205-D2 harbors the reversion of that variant. The two proteins predicted as RNA polymerase were β’ subunit (RpoC) and phosphoribulokinase. Their role in DAP-R remains unknown. RpoC mutation was previously described in DAP resistance in a clinical-strain pair of S. mitis/oralis and in other Gram-positive pathogens, including Staphylococcus spp. [29,30,31] and Enterococcus faecium [32,33]. Of note, in the HLDR 73 strain-set, we also observed changes in proteins associated with transcriptional response systems and cell wall biosynthesis (including penicillin-binding proteins) (Table 4). Similarly, many proteins involved in cell wall biosynthesis were also modified in the non-HLDR 205 strain-set. The potential impacts of these latter mutations on any of the phenotypic and/or metabolic metrics observed in this study are unknown at this time.
6. Discussion
We and others have described several distinct mechanisms that contribute to the DAP-R phenotype in S. mitis/oralis strains [8,9,10,11,34,35]. For example, we previously demonstrated that S. mitis/oralis isolates which undergo serial, long-term (6–10 d) in vitro or in vivo passage in DAP exhibit several distinct phenotypic and metabolic signatures, including: (i) disappearance of two key membrane PLs, i.e., PG and CL, with a buildup of the precursor molecule (PA) of the PG-CL biosynthetic pathway (8-10); (ii) increased membrane fluidity; (iii) increased positive surface charge; (iv) selective DAP hyper-accumulation in a minority of streptococcal chain cells; and (v) metabolic perturbations in glucose catabolism [11]. The current study was particularly designed to focus on the early (2 days) impacts and mechanisms of in vitro DAP-passage on two S. oralis strains that appear “destined” or not to rapidly evolve either an HLDR or non-HLDR phenotype.
Our current investigation yielded several noteworthy themes. First, similar to other prior HLDR S. mitis/oralis strains that we have studied [8,9,10], DAP-R strain 73-D2 exhibited an apparent near-disappearance of PG and CL as compared to its 73 parental strain on both 2D-TLC and lipidomics assays; in contrast, the non-HLDR 205-D2 demonstrated similar PG and CL profiles vs its parental strain. Since negatively charged PG is important for DAP’s “docking site” interactions, and ultimate oligomerization within target CMs [36,37], this PG-CL “disappearance phenotype” appears to be one plausible contributory mechanism for HLDR [8,9,10]. Additionally, negatively charged PLs (such as PG and especially CL) are critical in ‘directing’ DAP’s localization within the cell envelope to its major site of activity; i.e., the septal division plane [8].
Second, apart from the above PL alterations, our lipidomic analyses revealed modifications in several other lipid species, such as DAG, which was increased in the HLDR 73-D2 strain (vs. its parental progenitor). In contrast, the non-HLDR 205 strain-set had similar DAG profiles. These latter observations raise the possibility that the HLDR 73-D2 strain, in order to maintain its overall membrane structure, can efficiently recycle DAG; another possible pathway involved here could involve the PA phosphatase which catalyzes the dephosphorylation of PA to plausibly yield increased DAG in this HLDR strain [38]. It should be also emphasized that there are two key interrelated metabolic pathways which begin from the central metabolite, CDP-DAG: (i) PG phosphate synthase (PgsA), which catalyzes the condensation of glycerol-3-phosphate (G3P) with CDP-DAG, leading to the synthesis of PG phosphate (PGP), the first step in PG biosynthesis; and (ii) then CL synthase (ClsA) catalyzes the synthesis of CL from two molecules of PG (Supplementary Figure S3). PE, PG and CL can, thus, be the ‘building blocks’ for the synthesis of many other lipids [39]. Joyce et al. have recently shown that S. mitis/oralis strains can scavenge human metabolites, and use them to synthesize membrane PC, a very rare bacterial PL [40]. Further, our lipidomics analysis suggested a role for other significantly altered lipid species, e.g., Cer, SM, and FFA in 73-D2 and 205-D2 strains as compared to their respective parental strains. Cer, together with SM, can form sphingolipids; even though most pathogenic bacteria are not known to produce sphingolipids, they appear to be capable of using or degrading host sphingolipids to promote their virulence [41]. Unfortunately, the specific virulence roles of PI, PE, PS, PC, Cer, SM, and CE, which were observed in our lipidomics analyses, are poorly understood in bacterial pathogens, including S. mitis/oralis strains.
Third, another important feature seen in prior DAP-R S. mitis/oralis strains and other DAP-R bacteria (e.g., S. aureus and enterococci) is the evolution of substantially increased positive surface charge [8,9,16,24,25]. This adaptation in some DAP-R strains has been postulated to create a more “charge-repulsive milieu” that could contribute to a reduced ability of calcium-DAP to bind to target CMs to initiate its bactericidal effects [8,9,16,24,25]. However, this phenotype was not observed in our HLDR 73 D-2 strain. Thus, the emergence of a “cationic charge-repulsive cell surface” does not appear to be involved in the HLDR phenotype in our HLDR S. oralis strain-set.
Fourth, similar to previous observation [8,9,10], the HLDR 73-D2 strain exhibited an early adaptive increase in CM fluidity vs. its parental strain, a phenotype absent in the non-HLDR 205 strain-pair. Fluidity is a key determinant that influences the interactions of cationic antimicrobial peptides (e.g., host defense peptides and calcium-DAP) with the CM, as well as a variety of cellular processes, including the activity of CM-associated enzymes [8,9,16,24,25,42]. Most prior studies point to an ‘optimum’ level of CM fluidity for the interaction of specific cationic antimicrobial peptides (including calcium-DAP) with target bacterial CMs [8,9,10]. These latter data, as well as our current findings, suggest that altered membrane biophysical properties likely contribute to the early evolution of the HLDR phenotype in certain S. mitis/oralis strains. Since perturbations in the lipid and PL content can impact CM fluidity, the numerous modifications of these molecules seen above that distinguish the HLDR passage variant from its parental strain are likely in play.
Fifth, to understand the early adaptations in metabolic pathways that underlie the HLDR phenotype, we carried out several targeted metabolic assays to compare the evolution of the HLDR vs. non-HLDR phenotypes in our S. oralis strain-sets. Similar to previous observations in other S. mitis/oralis strains, the DAP-R 73-D2 strain demonstrated a reduced growth rate profile, especially during early growth phases, as compared to its parental strain; this growth defect was not seen in the 205 strain-pair. This change in the early growth of strain 73-D2 (but not in 205-D2) was associated with decreased glucose utilization as compared to its parental 73 strain. As expected, the accumulation of lactate in the growth media (catalyzed by membrane associated LDH) was largely dependent on the bacterial growth rate and glucose utilization noted above.
S. mitis/oralis strains may not completely oxidize glucose to acetyl coenzyme (acetyl-coA) because of their lack of an intact TCA cycle [11]. This can cause acetate to accumulate in the culture medium, associated with decreased media pH [26,28]. Thus, maintenance of the redox status in S. mitis/oralis strains must be alternatively performed by other means, e.g., ‘siphoning’ carbon through amino acid biosynthetic pathways [11]. However, in the current study, neither accumulation of acetate nor ammonia were detected early in either DAP-R strain (73-D2 or 205-D2) vs. each’s respective parental strain. These latter data suggested further that glucose metabolism plays the pivotal role in the early transitioning of selected DAP-S S. mitis/oralis strains to a stable HLDR phenotype during in vitro DAP exposures.
To further understand the linkage between glucose metabolism and alterations of PL content, we quantified GPDH, since this key enzyme serves as a major link between glucose and lipid metabolism (Supplementary Figure S3). Of note, this enzyme was significantly upregulated early in growth, especially in the HLDR 73-D2 vs its parental 73 strain. The central role of glycerol in intermediary metabolism can have significant pleiotropic effects either in the disappearance of PG and CL or in the accumulation of PA and other lipid species. Taken together, the altered patterns of both glycolytic and lipid metabolites, mediated by membrane-dependent enzymes (such as LDH and GPDH) strongly underscore the pivotal role of these essential cellular pathways in the early evolution of the HLDR phenotype.
Lastly, to elucidate the genetic correlates of glucose and lipid metabolism perturbations identified herein, we performed WGS, which highlighted several mutations in genes involved in lipid and glucose metabolism as correlating with the HLDR phenotype. For example, mutations associated with pap2 gene were noted in the HLDR 73-D2 strain; this gene encodes a type 2 PA phosphatase (PAP2) enzyme, similar to the phosphatidylglycerophosphatase (PGP) from E. coli [43,44]. This phosphatase dephosphorylates PGP to yield PG [43,44]. Another important mutation was found in the ldh gene; this might potentially encode for the increased enzymatic activity of LDH we observed in the HLDR 73-D2 strain. Further, a SNP was observed in the gpdh gene in the non-HLDR 205-D2 strain that might well connect glucose and lipid metabolism in this strain and also play an important role in the processing of glycerol in lipid metabolism [45]. Moreover, the non-synonymous SNP occurring in pgsA in the non-HLDR 205-D2 strain (vs. its parental 205 strain) that mediates the synthesis of PG (and subsequently CL) may be important in maintaining the levels of these key PLs. Collectively, these WGS data suggest that both HLDR and non-HLDR S. oralis strains adapt early to DAP exposures by unique genotypic modifications, potentially by both distinct PL biosynthetic modifications, as well as by glycolytic pathway alterations. Of course, it will be important to adjudicate whether these mutations in the above cadre of candidate genes are gain-in-function or loss-in-function perturbations, since both have been described related to DAP-R phenotypes [8,9,10]. The most famous example of this are the gain-in-function mutations in the mprF gene of S. aureus in DAP-R strains [16,31]. In enterococci, DAP-R has been associated with mutations in two- or three-component regulatory systems (yycFG; liaFSR), as well as by mutations in cls [46,47]. An overall reduction in PLs, including PG, lysyl-PG, and CL, were observed in such DAP-R enterococcal strains [24,48]. However, the most striking feature associated with DAP-R in enterococci is the diversion of anionic PLs (e.g., CL) away from the divisome [49].
As noted above, no distinctive genomic ‘signatures’ were discernable in the WGS analyses above, comparing either the two parental strains or by querying the early (day 2) DAP-passage isolates. Identifying a predictive genomic biomarker(s), exclusively seen in S. mitis/oralis parental strains that are ‘destined’ to rapidly evolve an HLDR phenotype when exposed to DAP, has obvious clinical therapeutic implications. However, this will require WGS profiling of a large S. mitis/oralis strain cohort, including both HLDR and non-HLDR isolates and ultimately featuring GWAS analytics. Of interest, we have recently reported an experimental IE study in which two S. mitis/oralis strains (both possessing the HLDR phenotype in vitro) were treated in vivo with DAP alone or DAP combined with ceftriaxone. As predicted, DAP treatment regimens encompassing human-equivalent standard-to-high dose regimens of 6-12 mg/kg/d, respectively, were ineffective at significantly reducing S. mitis/oralis bioburdens in any target tissues (i.e., cardiac vegetations, kidneys, and spleen) [50]. In contrast, combining DAP with ceftriaxone significantly reduced such bioburdens in all target tissues. Additional in vivo investigations of S. mitis/oralis strains which are either destined or not to develop the HLDR phenotype in vitro will be required to validate the translational importance of this phenotype.
In conclusion, it appears likely that the early evolution of HLDR in S. mitis/oralis strains may occur via a variety of phenotypic, metabolic, and genotypic mechanisms [8,9,10,11]. However, the current study had some important limitations: (i) we only studied two S. mitis/oralis strains, one each demonstrating either an early-onset of the “HLDR’’ phenotype or not; these same analytics need to be confirmed in a larger S. mitis/oralis strain cohort; (ii) we only examined phenotypic, metabolic, and genotypic parameters which occurred early post-DAP exposures; these parameters need to be further compared during later DAP exposure times; (iii) our comparative metrics compared outcomes after in vitro DAP exposures; we plan on carrying out additional DAP exposure profiling in in vivo DAP-exposed S. mitis/oralis strains, such as from the experimental IE model [50] (iv) other parameters of DAP:CM interactions associated with DAP-R need to be interrogated (e.g., localization of CL at the septal divisome [8,9] or hyper-accumulation of DAP within DAP-R cell subpopulations [8]); and (v) although WGS was performed, follow-up investigations of gene expression differences (e.g., RNA sequencing) need to be carried out.
Acknowledgments
We thank Kevin Williams at The UCLA Lipidomics Center for his support for mass spectrometric lipidomics data. Jose M. Miro has received a Personal 80:20 Research Grant from Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain.
Supplementary Materials
The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/antibiotics12071083/s1, Table S1. Summary of gene product changes seen in both S. oralis D2 derivatives compared to its D0 parental strains. Figure S1. Phospholipid (PL) patterns of HLDR and non-HLDR strains vs. respective parental strains. Figure S2 (A). Lipidomic data of 73-D2 and 205-D2 S. oralis strains vs. their respective parental strains; (B) Lipidomic data of 73 -D2 and 205-D2 vs. their respective parental strains; (C) Lipidomic data of 73-D2 and 205-D2 vs. their respective parental strains. Figure S3. Summary of linkage of glycolysis and phospholipid pathways.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, N.N.M.; Methodology, N.N.M., R.d.P.B., T.T.T., C.K.L. and A.S.B.; Software, N.N.M. and C.K.L.; Validation, N.N.M. and R.d.P.B.; Formal analysis, N.N.M.; Investigation, N.N.M., R.d.P.B. and C.K.L.; Resources, N.N.M. and J.M.M.; Data curation, N.N.M., T.T.T. and A.S.B.; Writing—original draft, N.N.M.; Writing—review & editing, N.N.M., R.d.P.B., T.T.T., R.A.P. and A.S.B.; Visualization, N.N.M., C.G.-d.-l.-M., J.M.M. and A.S.B.; Supervision, N.N.M. and A.S.B.; Project administration, N.N.M.; Funding acquisition, N.N.M. and A.S.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
Data is contained within the article and Supplementary Material.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Funding Statement
This study was supported in part by grants from the U.S. National Institutes of Health 5-R01-AI-130056-05 (to A.S.B.). N.N.M. was supported by The Lundquist Institute at Harbor-UCLA by an intramural research grant (#531604-01-01).
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
References
- 1.Garcia-de-la-Maria C., Pericas J.M., Del Rio A., Castaneda X., Vila-Farres X., Arme X., Armeropinal P.A., Cervera C., Soy D., Falces C., et al. Hospital clinic experimental endocarditis dtudy group. Early in vitro and in vivo development of high-level daptomycin resistance is common in mitis group streptococci after exposure to daptomycin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2013;57:2319–2325. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01921-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Holland T.L., Bayer A.S., Fowler V.G. Endocarditis and Intravascular Infections. In: Mandell G.L., Bennett J.E., Dolin R., Blaser M.J., editors. Principles and Practices of Infectious Diseases. 9th ed. Elsevier; Amsterdam, The Netherlands: 2020. Chapter 80. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Marron A., Carratala J., Gonzalez-Barca E., Fernandez-Sevilla A., Alcaide F., Gudiol F. Serious complications of bacteremia caused by viridans streptococci in neutropenic patients with cancer. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2000;31:1126–1130. doi: 10.1086/317460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Huang W.T., Chang L.Y., Hsueh P.R., Lu C.Y., Shao P.L., Huang F.Y., Lee P.I., Chen C.M., Lee C.Y., Huang L.M. Clinical features and complications of viridans streptococci bloodstream infection in pediatric hemato-oncology patients. J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect. 2007;40:349–354. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Shelburne S.A., Sahasrabhojane P., Saldana M., Hui Y., Xiaoping S., Horstmann N., Thompson E., Flores A.R. Streptococcus mitis strains causing severe clinical disease in cancer patients. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2014;20:762–771. doi: 10.3201/eid2005.130953. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Safdar A., Rolston K.V. Vancomycin tolerance, a potential mechanism for refractory gram-positive bacteremia observational study in patients with cancer. Cancer. 2006;106:1815–1820. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Akins R.L., Katz B.D., Monahan C., Alexander D. Characterization of high-level daptomycin resistance in viridans group streptococci developed upon in vitro exposure to daptomycin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2015;59:2102–2112. doi: 10.1128/AAC.04219-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Mishra N.N., Tran T.T., Seepersaud R., Garcia-de-la-Maria C., Faull K., Yoon A., Proctor R.A., Miro J.M., Rybak M.J., Bayer A.S., et al. Perturbations of phosphatidate cytidylyltransferase (CdsA) mediate daptomycin resistance in Streptococcus mitis/oralis by a novel mechanism. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2017;61:e02435-16. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02435-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Mishra N.N., Tran T.T., Arias C.A., Seepersaud R., Sullam P.M., Bayer A.S. Strain-specific adaptations of Streptococcus mitis-oralis to serial in vitro passage in daptomycin (DAP): Genotypic and phenotypic characteristics. Antibiotics. 2020;15:520. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics9080520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Tran T.T., Mishra N.N., Seepersaud R., Diaz L., Rios R., Dinh A.Q., Garcia-de-la-Maria C., Rybak M.J., Miro J.M., Shelburne S.A., et al. Mutations in cdsA and pgscorrelate with daptomycin resistance in Streptococcus mitis and S. oralis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2019;63:e01531-18. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01531-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Parrett A., Reed J.M., Gardner S.G., Mishra N.N., Bayer A.S., Powers R., Somerville G.A. Metabolic changes associated with adaptive resistance to daptomycin in Streptococcus mitis-oralis. BMC Microbiol. 2020;20:162. doi: 10.1186/s12866-020-01849-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Lee J.H., Ji H.J., Seo H.S., Sullam P.M. Complete genome sequence of Streptococcus oralis SF100, isolated from blood cultures from a patient with infective endocarditis. Microbiol. Resource Announc. 2021;10:e0017621. doi: 10.1128/MRA.00176-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Beghini F., McIver L.J., Blanco-Míguez A., Dubois L., Asnicar F., Maharjan S., Mailyan A., Manghi P., Scholz M., Thomas A.M., et al. Integrating taxonomic, functional, and strain-level profiling of diverse microbial communities with bioBakery. eLife. 2021;10:e65088. doi: 10.7554/eLife.65088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hsieh W.Y., Williams K.J., Su B., Bensinger S.J. Profiling of mouse macrophage lipidome using direct infusion shotgun mass spectrometry. STAR Protoc. 2020;2:100235. doi: 10.1016/j.xpro.2020.100235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Su B., Bettcher L.F., Hsieh W.Y., Hornburg D., Pearson M.J., Blomberg N., Giera M., Snyder M.P., Raftery D., Bensinger S.J., et al. A DMS shotgun lipidomics workflow application to facilitate high-throughput, comprehensive lipidomics. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2021;32:2655–2663. doi: 10.1021/jasms.1c00203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Mishra N.N., Bayer A.S., Baines S.L., Hayes A.S., Howden B.P., Lapitan C.K., Lew C., Rose W.E. Cell membrane adaptations mediate β-lactam-induced resensitization of daptomycin-resistant (DAP-R) Staphylococcus aureus in vitro. Microorganisms. 2021;9:1028. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9051028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kebriaei R., Bayer A.S., Lapitan C.K., Rybak M.J., Somerville G.A., Mishra N.N. Activity of the lactate dehydrogenase inhibitor oxamic acid against the fermentative bacterium Streptococcus mitis/oralis: Bactericidal effects and prevention of daptomycin resistance in vitro and in an ex vivo model. Antibiotics. 2022;11:1409. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11101409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Bolger A.M., Lohse M., Usadel B. Trimmomatic: A flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:2114–2120. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kolmogorov M., Yuan J., Lin Y., Pevzner P.A. Assembly of long, error-prone reads using repeat graphs. Nat. Biotechnol. 2019;37:540–546. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0072-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Hu J., Fan J., Sun Z., Liu S. Next Polish: A fast and efficient genome polishing tool for long-read assembly. Bioinformatics. 2020;36:2253–2255. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz891. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Gurevich A., Saveliev V., Vyahhi N., Tesler G. QUAST: Quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics. 2013;29:1072–1075. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Ondov B.D., Bergman N.H., Phillippy A.M. Interactive metagenomic visualization in a Web browser. BMC Bioinform. 2011;12:385. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Cingolani P., Platts A., Wang L.L., Coon M., Nguyen T., Wang L., Land S.J., Lu X., Ruden D.M. A program for annotating and predicting the effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms, SnpEff: SNPs in the genome of Drosophila melanogaster strain w1118; iso-2; iso-3. Fly. 2012;6:80–92. doi: 10.4161/fly.19695. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Mishra N.N., Bayer A.S., Tran T.T., Shamoo Y., Mileykovskaya E., Dowhan W., Guan Z., Arias C.A. Daptomycin resistance in enterococci is associated with distinct alterations of cell membrane phospholipid content. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e43958. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043958. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Kebriaei R., Rice S.A., Stamper K.C., Seepersaud R., Garcia-de-la-Maria C., Mishra N.N., Miro J.M., Arias C.A., Tran T.T., Sullam P.M., et al. Daptomycin dose-ranging evaluation with single-dose versus multidose ceftriaxone combinations against Streptococcus mitis/oralis in an ex vivo simulated endocarditis vegetation model. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2019;263:e00386-19. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00386-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Gaupp R., Lei S., Reed J.M., Peisker H., Boyle-Vavra S., Bayer A.S., Bischoff M., Herrmann M., Daum R.S., Powers R., et al. Staphylococcus aureus metabolic adaptations during the transition from a daptomycin susceptible phenotype to a daptomycin non-susceptible phenotype. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2015;59:4226–4238. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00160-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Linder L., Andersson C., Sund M.L., Shockman G.D. Protoplast formation and localization of enzymes in Streptococcus mitis. Infect. Immun. 1983;40:1146–1154. doi: 10.1128/iai.40.3.1146-1154.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Pinhal S., Ropers D., Geiselmann J., de Jong H. Acetate metabolism and the inhibition of bacterial growth by acetate. J. Bacteriol. 2019;201:e00147-19. doi: 10.1128/JB.00147-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Hagiya H., Sugawara Y., Kimura K., Hamaguchi S., Nishi I., Hayashi M., Akeda Y., Tomono K. Emergence of daptomycin non-susceptible coagulase-negative staphylococci in patients with cardiovascular device infections: Two cases report investigated by whole genome analysis. Medicine. 2018;97:e13487. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000013487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Friedman L., Alder J.D., Silverman J.A. Genetic changes that correlate with reduced susceptibility to daptomycin in Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2006;50:2137–2145. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00039-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Cameron D.R., Mortin L.I., Rubio A., Mylonakis E., Moellering R.C., Eliopoulos G.M., Jr., Peleg A.Y. Impact of daptomycin resistance on Staphylococcus aureus virulence. Virulence. 2015;6:127–131. doi: 10.1080/21505594.2015.1011532. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Li L., Higgs C., Turner A.M., Nong Y., Gorrie C.L., Sherry N.L., Dyet K.H., Seemann T., Williamson D.A., Stinear T.P., et al. Daptomycin resistance occurs predominantly in vanA-type vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium in Australa and is associated with heterogeneous and novel mutations. Front. Microbiol. 2021;12:749935. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.749935. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Mollerup S., Elmeskov C., Pinholt M., Sejersen T.S., Pedersen M.S., Worning P., Frees D., West H. Rapid in vivo development of resistance to daptomycin in vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium due to genomic alterations. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2022;369:fnac063. doi: 10.1093/femsle/fnac063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Adams H.M., Joyce L.R., Guan Z., Akins R.L., Palmer K.L. Streptococcus mitis and S. oralis lack a requirement for CdsA, the enzyme required for synthesis of major membrane phospholipids in bacteria. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2017;61:e02552-16. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02552-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Yeaman M.R., Chan L.C., Mishra N.N., Bayer A.S. Mechanistic fingerprinting reveals kinetic signatures of resistance to daptomycin and host defense peptides in Streptococcus mitis-oralis. Antibiotics. 2021;10:404. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10040404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Muraih J.K., Harris J., Taylor S.D., Palmer M. Characterization of daptomycin oligomerization with perylene excimer fluorescence: Stoichiometric binding of phosphatidylglycerol triggers oligomer formation. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2012;1818:673–678. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2011.10.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Muraih J.K., Pearson A., Silverman J., Palmer M. Oligomerization of daptomycin on membranes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2011;1808:1154–1160. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2011.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Carman G.M., Han G.S. Phosphatidic acid phosphatase, a key enzyme in the regulation of lipid synthesis. J. Biol. Chem. 2009;284:2593–2597. doi: 10.1074/jbc.R800059200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Sohlenkamp C., Geiger O. Bacterial membrane lipids: Diversity in structures and pathways. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2006;40:133–159. doi: 10.1093/femsre/fuv008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Joyce L.R., Guan Z., Palmer K.L. Phosphatidylcholine biosynthesis in mitis group streptococci via host metabolite scavenging. J. Bacteriol. 2019;201:e00495-19. doi: 10.1128/JB.00495-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Kunz T.C., Kozjak-Pavlovic V. Diverse facets of sphingolipid involvement in bacterial infections. Front. Cell. Dev. Biol. 2019;7:203. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2019.00203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.McMurchie E.J., Raison J.K. Membrane lipid fluidity and its effect on the activation energy of membrane-associated enzymes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1979;554:364–374. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(79)90377-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Carman G.M., Han G.S. Roles of phosphatidate phosphatase enzymes in lipid metabolism. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2006;31:694–699. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2006.10.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Chang Y.Y., Kennedy E.P. Phosphatidyl glycerophosphate phosphatase. J. Lipid Res. 1967;8:456–462. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2275(20)38902-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Yeh J.I., Chinte U., Du S. Structure of glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, an essential monotopic membrane enzyme involved in respiration and metabolism. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2008;105:3280–3285. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0712331105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Arias C.A., Panesso D., McGrath D.M., Qin X., Mojica M.F., Miller C., Diaz L., Tran T.T., Rincon S., Barbu E.M., et al. Genetic basis for in vivo daptomycin resistance in enterococci. N. Engl. J. Med. 2011;365:892–900. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1011138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Tran T.T., Panesso D., Gao H., Roh J.H., Munita J.M., Reyes J., Diaz L., Lobos E.A., Shamoo Y., Mishra N.N., et al. Whole-genome analysis of a daptomycin-susceptible Enterococcus faecium strain and its daptomycin-resistant variant arising during therapy. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2013;57:261–268. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01454-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Hines K.M., Waalkes A., Penewit K., Holmes E.A., Salipante S.J., Werth B.J., Xu L. Characterization of the mechanisms of daptomycin resistance among gram-positive bacterial pathogens by multidimensional lipidomics. mSphere. 2017;2:e00492-17. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00492-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Tran T.T., Panesso D., Mishra N.N., Mileykovskaya E., Guan Z., Munita J.M., Reyes J., Diaz L., Weinstock G.M., Murray B.E., et al. Daptomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis diverts the antibiotic molecule from the division septum and remodels cell membrane phospholipids. mBio. 2013;4:e00281-13. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00281-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Mishra N.N., Abdelhady W., Elsayed A.M., Lapitan C., Proctor R.A., Rybak M.J., Miro J.M., Bayer A.S. Combinations of daptomycin plus ceftriaxone, but not ascending daptomycin dose-regimens, are effective in experimental endocarditis caused by Streptococcus mitis-oralis strains: Target tissue clearances and prevention of emergence of daptomycin-resistance. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2023;67:e0147222. doi: 10.1128/aac.01472-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Data is contained within the article and Supplementary Material.