Abstract
Non-muscle myosin 2A (NM2A) is a key cytoskeletal enzyme that, along with actin, assembles into actomyosin filaments inside cells. NM2A is fundamental for cell adhesion and motility, playing important functions in different stages of development and during the progression of viral and bacterial infections. Phosphorylation events regulate the activity and the cellular localization of NM2A. We previously identified the tyrosine phosphorylation of residue 158 (pTyr158) in the motor domain of the NM2A heavy chain. This phosphorylation can be promoted by Listeria monocytogenes infection of epithelial cells and is dependent on Src kinase; however, its molecular role is unknown. Here, we show that the status of pTyr158 defines cytoskeletal organization, affects the assembly/disassembly of focal adhesions, and interferes with cell migration. Cells overexpressing a non-phosphorylatable NM2A variant or expressing reduced levels of Src kinase display increased stress fibers and larger focal adhesions, suggesting an altered contraction status consistent with the increased NM2A activity that we also observed. We propose NM2A pTyr158 as a novel layer of regulation of actomyosin cytoskeleton organization.
Keywords: NM2A, Src kinase, actomyosin cytoskeleton, cytoskeletal remodeling, cell migration
1. Introduction
The non-muscle myosin 2A (NM2A) is a major cytoskeletal motor protein that plays a central role in the contractility of the actin cytoskeleton [1,2]. Each NM2A molecule is a hexameric complex composed of two non-muscle myosin heavy chains (NMHC2A) and two pairs of light chains: the regulatory (RLCs) and essential (ELCs) light chains [1,2]. NMHC2A folds into three different domains: the conserved head/motor domain comprising the sites for ATP hydrolysis and actin binding; the neck domain that interacts with the light chains, stabilizing the protein and regulating NM2A activity; and the tail, containing a coiled coil region responsible for heavy chain homodimerization and non-muscle myosin II (NMII) filament formation [2,3]. Phosphorylation of the RLCs at threonine 18 and serine 19 regulates the NM2A enzymatic activity and filament formation [4,5,6,7]. The inactive form of NM2A, associated with unphosphorylated RLCs, folds into a compact structure in which motor heads and tails directly interact [2,8,9]. This autoinhibited molecule does not form filaments, interacts only weakly with actin, and freely diffuses in cells [10,11,12,13]. Upon phosphorylation of the RLC, the active NM2A molecules undergo antiparallel self-association to form bipolar filaments [10,14], which interact with actin filaments and power actomyosin network contraction by converting chemical energy into mechanical force via ATP hydrolysis [15]. NM2A subcellular distribution and filament assembly are additionally regulated by the specific phosphorylation on RLC tyrosine 155 in migrating cells [16] and on serine and threonine residues at the NMHC2A tail domain [17,18].
NM2A is broadly required for processes dependent on force generation and remodeling of the actomyosin cytoskeleton [19,20]. NM2A self-organizes into ordered superstructures, such as super clusters and stress fibers, through a combination of mechanical interactions and biochemical signaling [21,22,23,24]. Its activity and self-organization properties modulate the architecture of actomyosin networks, thus determining its function. In addition to regulating NM2A activity, phosphorylation plays critical roles in its organization within actomyosin networks [25,26]. The remodeling and contractility of such actomyosin networks shape cells and tissues during physiological processes such as development and wound repair.
Defects in NM2A functions are associated with a multitude of human diseases [22,27,28], including various viral and bacterial infections [29,30,31]. Upon cellular infection by the human pathogen Listeria monocytogenes, Src kinase is activated [32] and NMHC2A is phosphorylated in the conserved tyrosine 158 (Tyr158) residue, located in its motor domain [30]. Phosphorylation of Tyr158 (pTyr158) occurs in a Src-dependent manner and restricts bacterial cellular invasion [30]. Whether this phosphorylation controls the cellular processes NM2A are involved in, thus regulating the active cellular remodeling of actomyosin networks in space and time, has not been addressed yet.
Herein, we investigated the impact of NMHC2A pTyr158 on actomyosin cytoskeleton organization, cell adhesion, and migration. We found that the Src-dependent regulation of pTyr158 is essential to control the organization of the actomyosin cytoskeleton, assembly/disassembly of focal adhesions, and cell motility. Our results provide new insights into NM2A regulation through a novel phosphorylation event, which modulates subcellular events where NM2A’s function is crucial.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Cell Lines
HeLa cells (ATCC CCL-2) were grown in DMEM with glucose and L-glutamine (Lonza), supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Biowest, Nuaillé, France), and maintained at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere.
2.2. Reagents, Toxins, Antibodies and Dyes
Dasatinib (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA) was used at 300 nM in complete medium for 1 h before the experiment. The following antibodies were used at 1/200 for immunofluorescence microscopy (IF) or 1/1000 for immunoblotting (IB): mouse anti-β-actin (#A1978, Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA); rabbit anti-NMHC2A (#M8064, Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA); rabbit anti-calnexin (#AB2301, Merck Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA), rabbit anti-vinculin (#700062, Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA); rabbit anti-pMLC (Thr18/Ser19) (#3674, Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA, USA); and monoclonal anti-Src (GD11, abcam, Cambridge, UK). For IF analysis, DNA was stained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole dihydrochloride (DAPI; Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA) and actin with Rhodamine Phalloidin (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) at 1/200. Secondary antibodies were used at 1/500: goat anti-rabbit Alexa Fluor 488 (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA), goat anti-rabbit Alexa Fluor 594 (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA), and goat anti-mouse Cy3 (Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA, USA). For IB, goat anti-rabbit or anti-mouse HRP (Abliance, Compiègne, France) was used at 1/10,000.
2.3. Plasmids
CMV-GFP-NMHCII-A plasmid was a gift from Robert Adelstein (Addgene # 11347) [33]. Insertion of point mutations Y158F and -Y158E was achieved by site-directed mutagenesis using a QuickChange II Site-directed mutagenesis kit (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) as described in [30]. Hsp90 HA was a gift from William Sessa (Addgene # 22487) [34].
2.4. Transfections and shRNA Lentiviral Transductions
HeLa cells seeded on top of glass coverslips in NuncTM 24-well plates (5 × 104 cells/well), into Ibitreat μ-dishes (Ibidi, Martinsried, Bayern, Germany) (1 × 105 cells/well), or NuncTM 6-well plates (5 × 105 cells/well) were, respectively, transfected with 0.5 μg, 1 μg, or 2.5 μg of DNA using jetPRIME® Polyplus transfection reagent or Lipofectamine 2000® (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) according to the manufacturers’ instructions. Protein expression was allowed for 18 to 24 h before cells were processed. shRNA lentiviral transductions were performed as described in [30] and the sequences used are available in the Supplementary Materials (Table S1).
2.5. Immunoblot Assays
HeLa cells total protein extracts were recovered in sample buffer (0.25 mM Tris–Cl, pH 6.8; 10% SDS; 50% glycerol; and 5% β-mercaptoethanol), resolved by SDS–PAGE (10% acrylamide), and transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes using a TransBlot Turbo™ system (BioRad, Hercules, CA, USA) at 0.3 A for 1 h. Primary and secondary HRP-conjugated antibodies were diluted in TBS–Tween 0.1% (150 mM NaCl; 50 mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.4; and 0.1% Tween) with 5% (m/v) milk. For the immunoblot assessing the expression levels of Src, 20 ug of total protein extracts from WT and shSrc HeLa cells were loaded. Washes were performed with TBS–Tween 0.2%. The signal was detected using Western Blotting Substrate (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and collected in a ChemiDoc™ XRS+ System with Image Lab™ Software (version 3.0.1.14, BioRad, Hercules, CA, USA).
2.6. Immunofluorescence Microscopy
Cells were fixed in 3% paraformaldehyde (15 min at room temperature), quenched with 20 mM NH4Cl (1 h), and permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 (5 min). Coverslips were incubated for 1 h with primary antibodies, washed three times in PBS 1×, and incubated for 45 min with secondary antibodies and, when indicated, Rhodamine Phalloidin and DAPI. Antibodies and dyes were diluted in PBS containing 1% BSA. Coverslips were mounted onto microscope slides with Aqua-Poly/Mount (Polysciences, Warrington, PA, USA). Images were collected with a confocal laser scanning microscope (Leica SP5 II, Wetzlar, Germany) and processed using Fiji™ (version 2.9.0/1.53t) or Adobe Photoshop (CS6 version 13.0) softwares.
2.7. g-Actin and f-Actin Separation
HeLa cells (5 × 105) were seeded in six-well plates and either transfected to express GFP-NMHC2A-WT or -Y158F variants or treated with dasatinib for 1 h. Cells were washed twice with PBS 1x and homogenized for 10 min at 37 °C in actin stabilization buffer (0.1 M Hepes, pH 6.9, 30% glycerol (v/v), 5% DMSO (v/v), 1 mM MgSO4, 1 mM EGTA, 1% Triton X-100 (v/v), 1 mM ATP, complete protease, and phosphatase inhibitors). Total protein fractions were ultracentrifuged at 100,000× g for 75 min at 37 °C. Supernatants containing g-actin were collected, and pellets containing f-actin were resuspended in an equivalent volume of RIPA buffer. Total, supernatant, and pellet fractions were processed for immunoblotting.
2.8. Quantification of Immunofluorescence Images: NMHC2A Aggregates, Stress Fibers, Focal Adhesions, Phospho-Regulatory Light Chain (pMLC), Cell Area, and Aspect Ratio
The percentage of cells displaying stress fibers or NMHC2A aggregates was quantified in at least 200 cells per sample. Cells showing approximately 50% (arbitrary) of their total area covered by dense actomyosin fibers were considered positive for stress fibers. Cells displaying at least two distinct aggregates larger than 2 µm or one larger than 5 µm were considered positive for aggregation. Anisotropy was quantified using the Fiji™ plug-in FibrilTool as described in [35] and focal adhesions were quantified as described in [36] using the CLAHE and Log3D Fiji™ plug-ins. The levels of pMLC were quantified using Fiji™ by measuring the raw integrated density of pMLC in each cell normalized by the total cell area in at least 100 cells per sample. The area of the cells and respective aspect ratio were measured using the analysis tool in Fiji™.
2.9. Cell Motility Analysis
Cells were seeded into Ibitreat μ-dishes (Ibidi, Martinsried, Bayern, Germany), transfected to express the different GFP-NMHC2A variants, maintained in OptiMEM (Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) at 37 °C and 5% CO2, and imaged using a widefield microscope (Leica DMI6000 Time-lapse, Wetzlar, Germany) equipped with a 20 × 0.4 NA objective. Data sets of transmitted light and the fluorescence of GFP-NMHC2A were acquired every 10 min between 16 and 20 h. Fiji™ was used for image sequence analyses and video assembly. The velocity and accumulated distance were analyzed in at least 200 cells/condition using the Manual tracking plug-in from Fiji™.
2.10. Fluorescence Recovery after Photobleaching (FRAP)
HeLa cells were transfected to express either GFP-NMHC2A-WT or -Y158F. Images were acquired 20 h after transfection using a laser scanning confocal microscope SP8 (Leica) equipped with a 63 × 1.3 NA objective at 37 °C and 5% CO2. Five pre-bleach images were acquired every 138 ms, followed by five bleaching scans with 100% intensity on the 488 nm laser line over the region of interest (ROI). The recovery of fluorescence was monitored for 56 s every 138 ms (400 frames), followed by 60 s every 300 ms (200 frames). Mean fluorescence intensities (MFI) were measured in Fiji™ and a fluorescence recovery analysis was performed as described in [37] using the easyFRAP-web on-line platform (https://easyfrap.vmnet.upatras.gr/ (accessed on 3 June 2019)). Briefly, the MFI of the bleached ROI was normalized to non-bleached ROIs. We followed a full-scale normalization which subtracts background values at each time point and corrects for laser fluctuations, fluorescence losses during photobleaching, differences in starting intensities, and losses in total fluorescence. Additionally, the MFI was corrected for differences in the bleaching efficiency following easyFRAP-web on-line platform recommendations [37]. The mobile fraction and the half-maximal recovery time (T-half) values were obtained by curve fitting. Curve fitting was performed using a single- and double-term exponential equation and obtained R2 values served as a goodness-of-fit measure. Only cells for which fitted curves showed an R2 ≥ 0.8 were considered to quantify the mobile fraction and T-half.
2.11. Statistical Analysis
Statistical analyses were carried out with Prism 8 (version 8.1.1, GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA), using a two-tailed unpaired Student’s t-test for comparison of means between two samples.
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Actomyosin Cytoskeleton Organization Is Modulated by NMHC2A pTyr158
Previous data demonstrated that Listeria monocytogenes infection activates Src kinase [32], which in turn phosphorylates NMHC2A on the conserved tyrosine 158 (Tyr158) residue [30]. Considering the central role of NM2A in key cellular processes [2], we hypothesized that NMHC2A pTyr158 may control physiological events that rely on the remodeling of the actomyosin cytoskeleton. To address this, we tested the impact of NMHC2A pTyr158 in the overall organization of the actomyosin cytoskeleton. HeLa cells were transfected to express either a GFP-tagged wild-type NMHC2A (GFP-NMHC2A-WT), a mutant mimicking a permanent phosphorylation in which Tyr158 was replaced by a glutamate (GFP-NMHC2A-Y158E), or a non-phosphorylatable NMHC2A mutant in which Tyr158 was substituted by a phenylalanine (GFP-NMHC2A-Y158F). The percentage of transfected cells (Figure 1A) and the expression levels, measured as the mean GFP signal intensity (Figure 1B), were similar for the three NMHC2A variants.
A confocal microscopy analysis of transfected cells revealed that GFP-NMHC2A-Y158E aggregated in 40% of the cells, while GFP-NMHC2A-WT was detected in aggregates in 20% of the cells (Figure 1C,D). This aggregation phenotype, of which an acute example is depicted in Figure 1C, was reverted when GFP-NMHC2A-Y158E was co-expressed with the chaperone HSP90 (Figure 1E), reported to facilitate NMHC2A folding and actomyosin filament assembly [38,39,40]. This observation suggests that the aggregation phenotype might be related to GFP-NMHC2A-Y158E folding and/or assembly defects, which are overcome by the overexpression of HSP90. NM2A aggregation was previously reported for mutants affecting ATPase’s activity and ability to translocate actin filaments [41]. Thus, considering that GFP-NMHC2A-Y158E aggregation may trigger toxic effects and/or be associated with a decreased NM2A activity and that phospho-mimetic mutations do not always mimic the presumed phosphorylations [42,43], we pursued our study with only the non-phosphorylatable mutant (GFP-NMHC2A-Y158F).
About 60% of the cells expressing GFP-NMHC2A-Y158F were found enriched in actin filaments, displaying large areas covered by stress fibers (Figure 1C,F) organized in an anisotropic orientation (Figure S1). Only 20% of the GFP-NMHC2A-WT-expressing cells were enriched in stress fibers, which also displayed anisotropic orientation (Figure 1C,F and Figure S1). To support these findings, we performed actin fractionation assays to assess the levels of globular (g-) and filamentous (f-) actin in cells overexpressing NMHC2A-WT or -Y158F variants. The amount of f-actin (pellet fraction, P) was higher in GFP-NMHC2A-Y158F- than in GFP-NMHC2A-WT-expressing cells (Figure 1G) and thus, the g-/f-actin ratio was significantly decreased in cells expressing the GFP-NMHC2A-Y158F variant (Figure 1H). Our data thus show that cells expressing the non-phosphorylatable NMHC2A variant accumulate stress fibers and f-actin filaments. Since the total levels of actin remained comparable (Figure 1G), the accumulation of stress fibers and f-actin detected in cells expressing the non-phosphorylatable NMHC2A variant (GFP-NMHC2A-Y158F) may be due to increased actin polymerization and/or decreased depolymerization, which would alter the filament turnover and dynamics. We speculate that GFP-NMHC2A-Y158F may have a higher f-actin crosslinking activity than its WT counterpart, inducing filaments to coalesce and thus increasing the overall density of the network and contraction [44]. Besides motor activity, the NMHC2A-mediated crosslinking of actin filaments was proposed to increase tension and to contribute to cortical integrity [44,45,46]. Additionally, cells with stress fibers have been demonstrated to produce high contractile forces which are not locally restricted but propagate to the surrounding actin network, impacting the overall contractile energy of the cell [47]. The accumulation of f-actin or stress fibers is associated with an increased cell stiffness and rigidity, adhesion to the substratum, and decreased cell migration capabilities [48,49]. Our data thus suggest that by accumulating stress fibers and reorganizing their actomyosin cytoskeleton, cells expressing the non-phosphorylatable variant GFP-NMHC2A-Y158F may display strong adhesion to the substratum and an impaired ability to migrate. In addition, it raises the hypothesis that through the phosphorylation of NMHC2A Tyr158, the cell may reorganize its actomyosin cytoskeleton and adapt its contractile state to respond to external cues.
3.2. Src Kinase Coordinates Actomyosin Cytoskeleton Remodeling
Given that the phosphorylation status of Tyr158 affects the organization of the actomyosin cytoskeleton and that during Listeria infection, NMHC2A pTyr158 depends on Src kinase [30], we further investigated the role of Src activity in the overall organization of the actomyosin cytoskeleton. For that, we interfered with the Src activity by using the pharmacological inhibitor Dasatinib (Dasa) or downregulating the Src expression through specific shRNAs (shSrc). The reduced expression of Src kinase in shSrc cells was confirmed by immunoblotting (Figure S2). A confocal microscopy analysis consistently showed that cells with a reduced Src activity or Src expression display more stress fibers than control cells (Figure 2A). Indeed, the percentage of cells displaying stress fibers significantly increased under impaired Src conditions (Figure 2B). In addition, actin fractionation assays on total lysates of Src-impaired cells showed decreased levels of g-actin (supernatant fraction, S) and, concomitantly, increased levels of f-actin in the pellet fraction (Figure 2C). In agreement with the increased stress fibers detected by fluorescence microscopy, the g-/f-actin ratio was significantly reduced in Src-impaired cells (Figure 2D). These data show that cells with impaired Src activity display an accumulation of stress fibers, as observed in those expressing the non-phosphorylatable GFP-NMHC2A-Y158F. Of note, our previous data demonstrated that NMHC2A pTyr158 triggered by bacterial infection does not occur in cells expressing reduced levels of Src kinase [30]. Supporting this crosstalk between Src and NMHC2A, previous studies showed that Src activity controls cortical tension and/or membrane dynamics in NMII-dependent processes such as non-apoptotic plasma membrane blebbing [50], cell volume regulation upon osmotic stress [51,52], and neuronal growth cone [53].
A high Src activity reduces cell adhesion by triggering stress fiber disassembly [54,55,56], which enhances cell migration, invasion, and tumor metastasis [48,57]. Contrarily, and in agreement with our observations, a low Src activity was reported to promote stress fiber assembly, which is associated with cell stiffening [48] and a reduced cell migration [58]. In line with this, Src-deficient fibroblasts show reinforced integrin and actomyosin cytoskeleton interactions [59], also limiting migration. Our data strikingly show that the overexpression of a NMHC2A molecule non-phosphorylatable on Tyr158 phenocopies the behavior of cells with impaired Src activity, which suggests that Src-dependent phosphorylation of NMHC2A Tyr158 might contribute to Src-mediated cell processes. Thus, this raises the hypothesis that, besides coordinating the actomyosin cytoskeleton by targeting ROCK and FAK [60], Src kinase might also regulate the actomyosin cytoskeleton through the direct control of NMHC2A pTyr.
3.3. The Focal Adhesion Morphology Is Regulated by NMHC2A pTyr158
Stress fibers and focal adhesions are structurally and functionally interdependent [49,61]. Despite controversy in the field, much evidence pinpoints that the assembly of stress fibers and focal adhesions depends on tension generated by non-muscle myosin II (NMII) [49]. Indeed, the activity of NMII was shown to drive the assembly of stress fibers and focal adhesions [62] and NMII expression is required for the maturation of nascent adhesions [63,64]. Considering the described interconnections between Src, NMII activity, stress fibers, and focal adhesions and our observations regarding the stress fiber accumulation in cells expressing the non-phosphorylatable GFP-NMHC2A-Y158F variant, we investigated whether focal adhesions would also be affected by the status of NMHC2A pTyr158. Cells overexpressing GFP-NMHC2A-WT or -Y158F were fixed and immunolabeled for vinculin, a marker for focal adhesions [65]. The number, size, and shape of the focal adhesions were analyzed by confocal microscopy. Although in GFP-NMHC2A-Y158F-expressing cells the number of focal adhesions per cell was significantly decreased (Figure 3A,B), they were larger and more elongated, displaying increased areas and aspect ratios (Figure 3A,C,D).
The traction force that focal adhesions exert on the cell substrate was shown to be directly related to their size [66,67]. Possibly, under increasing tension, new proteins are recruited to focal adhesions whose composition may thus be regulated by mechanical stress [68,69]. In agreement with this, several proteins such as vinculin were found to be associated with focal adhesions in an NMII-dependent manner [70,71,72].
While the assembly of ventral stress fibers and focal adhesions depends on the tension powered by NM2A contractility [62,63,64,70], other studies reported that the tension and NMII activity had little effect on both stress fiber and focal adhesion assembly [73,74,75]. Our data favor the involvement of NM2A-mediated mechanical tension in the assembly of stress fibers and their associated focal adhesions.
Together with the increased stress fibers detected in cells overexpressing GFP-NMHC2A-Y158F, our results also suggest that focal adhesions are under increased tension and that the NMHC2A pTyr158 status not only regulates stress fiber assembly but also interferes with focal adhesion morphology, thus indicating a role in their formation and/or maturation. Overall, we show here the critical importance of NMHC2A pTyr158 in cytoskeletal organization and cell adhesion, also suggesting its involvement in cell migration.
3.4. The Lack of NMHC2A pTyr158 Affects Cell Size and Impairs Cell Motility
Considering the well-established roles of Src kinase, NMHC2A, and actin cytoskeleton in the regulation of cell size/shape and migration [76,77,78], and our data showing that the Src-mediated phosphorylation of NMHC2A Tyr158 impacts actomyosin cytoskeleton organization, we investigated if the status of NMHC2A pTyr158 may affect the cell shape parameters and cell migration. We compared the area and aspect ratio of cells expressing GFP-NMHC2A-WT or -Y158F. Expression of GFP-NMHC2A-Y158F led to a slightly increased cell area (Figure 4A). However, aspect ratio values were similar in both conditions (Figure 4B). To evaluate the consequences of the cytoskeletal alterations induced by the expression of NMHC2A-Y158F, we monitored the motility of HeLa cells using fluorescence timelapse microscopy (Figure 4C and Movie S1). A cell tracking analysis of the timelapse videos revealed that cells expressing GFP-NMHC2A-Y158F migrated with a reduced velocity (Figure 4D) and spanned shorter distances (Figure 4E) when compared to cells expressing GFP-NMHC2A-WT. These results are in line with the elongated focal adhesions and increased stress fibers we observed, indicating that cells are possibly under increased tension if the non-phosphorylatable NMHC2A-Y158F is overexpressed. The NMHC2A pTyr158 status thus modulates cell motility, most likely through the control of actomyosin cytoskeleton organization.
3.5. NMHC2A pTyr Regulates NM2A Activation and Dynamics
Given our observations, we next examined whether pTyr158 could affect the NM2A turnover on actin filaments. To investigate this, we performed Fluorescence Recovery After Photobleaching (FRAP) in HeLa cells overexpressing either GFP-NMHC2A-WT or -Y158F. The GFP signal of NMHC2A was photobleached in a single region per cell where NMHC2A filaments were detected, the recovery of the signal was followed over time and the data were analyzed using the easyFRAP-web on-line platform [37]. The GFP signal within the photobleached region in cells overexpressing GFP-NMHC2A-Y158F recovered faster than that in cells overexpressing GFP-NMHC2A-WT (Figure 5A,B). The mobile fraction, corresponding to the fraction of molecules able to turnover, and the half time required for signal recovery (T-half) were obtained from the easyFRAP-web mean curve fitting tool [37]. The calculated mobile fractions were similar under both conditions (Figure 5C). However, the half time for signal recovery was significantly shorter in cells expressing GFP-NMHC2A-Y158F as compared to those expressing GFP-NMHC2A-WT (Figure 5D), indicating that the expression of non-phosphorylatable NMHC2A-Y158F allows for a faster NM2A turnover.
NM2A filament dynamics and self-organization require NM2A contractility, which is in turn regulated by RLC phosphorylation [2,21]. Thus, we quantified phosphorylated RLC in residues threonine 18 and serine 19 (pMLC) to assess the levels of NM2A activation. In agreement with a faster turnover, we found that cells overexpressing the non-phosphorylatable GFP-NMHC2A-Y158F displayed higher levels of pMLC than those expressing GFP-NMHC2A-WT (Figure 5E–H). In addition, pMLC co-localized with stress fibers, induced by the expression of GFP-NMHC2A-Y158F (Figure 5E). Overall, NM2A-Y158F-expressing cells displayed increased levels of Thr18/Ser19 phosphorylated myosin regulatory light chain and showed a faster turnover of NM2A, which might be associated with an increased contractility [49]. Our results suggest that non-phosphorylated Tyr158 triggers NM2A activation and increases its dynamics within assembled filaments and not at the single molecule level.
4. Conclusions
Phosphorylations in tyrosine residues control cell signaling and regulate a variety of biological processes, including the reorganization of the cytoskeleton [79,80]. We previously reported an uncharacterized tyrosine phosphorylation event in NMHC2A triggered by bacterial infections [30]. Infection with L. monocytogenes induced Src-dependent NMHC2A phosphorylation on Tyr158, a residue that is located close to the ATP-binding pocket of NMHC2A and was predicted to be accessible for phosphorylation [81]. Here, we showed that the regulation of NMHC2A pTyr158 contributes to the cellular organization of the actomyosin cytoskeleton.
Larger and more elongated focal adhesions, together with increased stress fibers and higher pMLC levels detected in NMHC2A-Y158F-expressing cells, suggest an altered contraction status that may be associated with an increased tension, a stronger adhesion to the substratum, and increased forces exerted on the extracellular matrix [48,82,83]. The phosphorylation status of NMHC2A Tyr158 could therefore regulate the assembly/disassembly of focal adhesions and stress fibers, thus providing a novel mechanism to modulate cytoskeletal organization. Phosphorylation events in the regulatory light chain and the heavy chain tail domain, respectively, regulate NM2A activity (reviewed in [2]), the spatial localization [16], and the dynamics of NM2A filaments [84,85]. Whether the phosphorylation of Y158 interferes with other phosphorylation events reported to regulate the NM2A activity or filament assembly is unknown, but worth investigating in the future. To our knowledge, pTyr158 is the only phosphorylation occurring in the motor domain of NMHC2A that contributes to regulating the dynamics of the actomyosin cytoskeleton. Previous studies proposed that the formation of heterotypic filaments [86,87] and the assembly of NMII supramolecular structures, named NMII stacks [21,88], may modulate actomyosin dynamics likely to accomplish specific functions in particular spatiotemporal contexts [42,89]. It is possible that pTyr158 regulates the assembly of such heterotypic filaments and/or NMII stacks. By interfering with actomyosin remodeling, one can speculate that the phosphorylation status of NMHC2A Tyr158 may affect NM2A-driven cellular processes such as cytokinesis, membrane trafficking, and organelle positioning. As a proof of concept, data from our laboratory indicate that permanent phosphorylation of Tyr158 impairs cytokinesis in C. elegans embryos, while worms expressing a non-phosphorylatable NMHC2A are more susceptible to stress cues such as heat and bacterial infections (Brito et al., unpublished data).
We thus propose a new conserved mechanism for the regulation of the actomyosin cytoskeleton through the control of NM2A pTyr158. This adds a new layer of complexity in the control of actomyosin dynamics with a major impact on cell adhesion to a substrate and cell migration.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to the members of i3S scientific facility ALM for their technical assistance with microscopy, especially Maria Azevedo and Mafalda Sousa.
Supplementary Materials
The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/cells12141871/s1, Figure S1: Quantification of the anisotropic distribution of stress fibers; Figure S2: Immunoblots showing Src and actin levels in extracts from WT and shSrc HeLa cells. Actin was used as a loading control. Table S1: shRNA sequences for Src knockdown in HeLa cells; Movie S1: Ectopic expression of the different GFP-NMHC2A variants affects cell motility in HeLa cells.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization: C.B., F.S.M., D.C. and S.S.; investigation, C.B., F.S.M. and J.M.P.; funding acquisition: D.C. and S.S.; writing—original draft: C.B. and S.S.; writing—review and editing: F.S.M., J.M.P. and D.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Funding Statement
This work was funded by FEDER—Fundo Europeu de Desenvolvimento Regional funds through the COMPETE 2020—Operational Program for Competitiveness and Internationalization (POCI), Portugal 2020, by Portuguese funds through FCT—Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia/Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Ensino Superior in the framework of the project POCI-01-0145-FEDER-030863 (PTDC/BIA-CEL/30863/2017). CB, FSM, and JMP were supported by FCT fellowships (SFRH/BD/112217/2015, SFRH/BPD/94458/2013, and SFRH/BD/143940/2019, respectively). CB is a Fulbright and FLAD fellow. SS receives support from the FCT CEEC program (CEECINST/00091/2018/CP1500/CT0006 and 2022.04457.CEECIND). This publication was funded by National Funds through FCT-Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, I.P., under the project UIDB/04293/2020.
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
References
- 1.Vicente-Manzanares M., Ma X., Adelstein R.S., Horwitz A.R. Non-muscle myosin II takes centre stage in cell adhesion and migration. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2009;10:778–790. doi: 10.1038/nrm2786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Brito C., Sousa S. Non-Muscle Myosin 2A (NM2A): Structure, Regulation and Function. Cells. 2020;9:1590. doi: 10.3390/cells9071590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Heissler S.M., Manstein D.J. Nonmuscle myosin-2: Mix and match. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2013;70:1–21. doi: 10.1007/s00018-012-1002-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Liu X., Billington N., Shu S., Yu S.H., Piszczek G., Sellers J.R., Korn E.D. Effect of ATP and regulatory light-chain phosphorylation on the polymerization of mammalian nonmuscle myosin II. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2017;114:E6516–E6525. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1702375114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kendrick-Jones J., Taylor K.A., Scholey J.M. Phosphorylation of nonmuscle myosin and stabilization of thick filament structure. Methods Enzym. 1982;85:364–370. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(82)85035-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Scholey J.M., Taylor K.A., Kendrick-Jones J. Regulation of non-muscle myosin assembly by calmodulin-dependent light chain kinase. Nature. 1980;287:233–235. doi: 10.1038/287233a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Umemoto S., Sellers J.R. Characterization of in vitro motility assays using smooth muscle and cytoplasmic myosins. J. Biol. Chem. 1990;265:14864–14869. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)77194-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Jung H.S., Komatsu S., Ikebe M., Craig R. Head-head and head-tail interaction: A general mechanism for switching off myosin II activity in cells. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2008;19:3234–3242. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e08-02-0206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kiboku T., Katoh T., Nakamura A., Kitamura A., Kinjo M., Murakami Y., Takahashi M. Nonmuscle myosin II folds into a 10S form via two portions of tail for dynamic subcellular localization. Genes Cells. 2013;18:90–109. doi: 10.1111/gtc.12021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Billington N., Wang A., Mao J., Adelstein R.S., Sellers J.R. Characterization of three full-length human nonmuscle myosin II paralogs. J. Biol. Chem. 2013;288:33398–33410. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.499848. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Craig R., Smith R., Kendrick-Jones J. Light-chain phosphorylation controls the conformation of vertebrate non-muscle and smooth muscle myosin molecules. Nature. 1983;302:436–439. doi: 10.1038/302436a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Yang S., Lee K.H., Woodhead J.L., Sato O., Ikebe M., Craig R. The central role of the tail in switching off 10S myosin II activity. J. Gen. Physiol. 2019;151:1081–1093. doi: 10.1085/jgp.201912431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Yang S., Tiwari P., Lee K.H., Sato O., Ikebe M., Padrón R., Craig R. Cryo-EM structure of the inhibited (10S) form of myosin II. Nature. 2020;588:521–525. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-3007-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Heissler S.M., Sellers J.R. Various Themes of Myosin Regulation. J. Mol. Biol. 2016;428:1927–1946. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2016.01.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.De La Cruz E.M., Ostap E.M. Kinetic and equilibrium analysis of the myosin ATPase. Methods Enzym. 2009;455:157–192. doi: 10.1016/S0076-6879(08)04206-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Aguilar-Cuenca R., Llorente-González C., Chapman J.R., Talayero V.C., Garrido-Casado M., Delgado-Arévalo C., Millán-Salanova M., Shabanowitz J., Hunt D.F., Sellers J.R., et al. Tyrosine Phosphorylation of the Myosin Regulatory Light Chain Controls Non-muscle Myosin II Assembly and Function in Migrating Cells. Curr. Biol. 2020;30:2446–2458.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2020.04.057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Dulyaninova N.G., Bresnick A.R. The heavy chain has its day: Regulation of myosin-II assembly. Bioarchitecture. 2013;3:77–85. doi: 10.4161/bioa.26133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Breckenridge M.T., Dulyaninova N.G., Egelhoff T.T. Multiple regulatory steps control mammalian nonmuscle myosin II assembly in live cells. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2009;20:338–347. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e08-04-0372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Lecuit T., Lenne P.F. Cell surface mechanics and the control of cell shape, tissue patterns and morphogenesis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2007;8:633–644. doi: 10.1038/nrm2222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Garrido-Casado M., Asensio-Juárez G., Vicente-Manzanares M. Nonmuscle Myosin II Regulation Directs Its Multiple Roles in Cell Migration and Division. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2021;37:285–310. doi: 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-042721-105528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Dasbiswas K., Hu S., Schnorrer F., Safran S.A., Bershadsky A.D. Ordering of myosin II filaments driven by mechanical forces: Experiments and theory. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2018;373:20170114. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Beach J.R., Shao L., Remmert K., Li D., Betzig E., Hammer J.A. Nonmuscle Myosin II Isoforms Coassemble in Living Cells. Curr. Biol. 2014;24:1160–1166. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.03.071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Beach J.R., Bruun K.S., Shao L., Li D., Swider Z., Remmert K., Zhang Y., Conti M.A., Adelstein R.S., Rusan N.M., et al. Actin dynamics and competition for myosin monomer govern the sequential amplification of myosin filaments. Nat. Cell Biol. 2017;19:85–93. doi: 10.1038/ncb3463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Hu S., Dasbiswas K., Guo Z., Tee Y.-H., Thiagarajan V., Hersen P., Chew T.-L., Safran S.A., Zaidel-Bar R., Bershadsky A.D. Long-range self-organization of cytoskeletal myosin II filament stacks. Nat. Cell Biol. 2017;19:133–141. doi: 10.1038/ncb3466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Acharya B.R., Wu S.K., Lieu Z.Z., Parton R.G., Grill S.W., Bershadsky A.D., Gomez G.A., Yap A.S. Mammalian Diaphanous 1 Mediates a Pathway for E-cadherin to Stabilize Epithelial Barriers through Junctional Contractility. Cell Rep. 2017;18:2854–2867. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.02.078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Pasapera A.M., Plotnikov S.V., Fischer R.S., Case L.B., Egelhoff T.T., Waterman C.M. Rac1-Dependent Phosphorylation and Focal Adhesion Recruitment of Myosin IIA Regulates Migration and Mechanosensing. Curr. Biol. 2015;25:175–186. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.11.043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Pecci A., Ma X., Savoia A., Adelstein R.S. MYH9: Structure, functions and role of non-muscle myosin IIA in human disease. Gene. 2018;664:152–167. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2018.04.048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Newell-Litwa K.A., Horwitz R., Lamers M.L. Non-muscle myosin II in disease: Mechanisms and therapeutic opportunities. Dis. Model. Mech. 2015;8:1495–1515. doi: 10.1242/dmm.022103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Arii J., Goto H., Suenaga T., Oyama M., Kozuka-Hata H., Imai T., Minowa A., Akashi H., Arase H., Kawaoka Y., et al. Non-muscle myosin IIA is a functional entry receptor for herpes simplex virus-1. Nature. 2010;467:859–862. doi: 10.1038/nature09420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Almeida M.T., Mesquita F.S., Cruz R., Osório H., Custódio R., Brito C., Vingadassalom D., Martins M., Leong J.M., Holden D.W., et al. Src-dependent tyrosine phosphorylation of non-muscle myosin heavy chain-IIA restricts Listeria monocytogenes cellular infection. J. Biol. Chem. 2015;290:8383–8395. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.591313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Tan L., Yuan X., Liu Y., Cai X., Guo S., Wang A. Non-muscle Myosin II: Role in Microbial Infection and Its Potential as a Therapeutic Target. Front. Microbiol. 2019;10:401. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Sousa S., Cabanes D., Bougnères L., Lecuit M., Sansonetti P., Tran-Van-Nhieu G., Cossart P. Src, cortactin and Arp2/3 complex are required for E-cadherin-mediated internalization of Listeria into cells. Cell. Microbiol. 2007;9:2629–2643. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2007.00984.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Wei Q., Adelstein R.S. Conditional expression of a truncated fragment of nonmuscle myosin II-A alters cell shape but not cytokinesis in HeLa cells. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2000;11:3617–3627. doi: 10.1091/mbc.11.10.3617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.García-Cardeña G., Fan R., Shah V., Sorrentino R., Cirino G., Papapetropoulos A., Sessa W.C. Dynamic activation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase by Hsp90. Nature. 1998;392:821–824. doi: 10.1038/33934. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Boudaoud A., Burian A., Borowska-Wykręt D., Uyttewaal M., Wrzalik R., Kwiatkowska D., Hamant O. FibrilTool, an ImageJ plug-in to quantify fibrillar structures in raw microscopy images. Nat. Protoc. 2014;9:457–463. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2014.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Horzum U., Ozdil B., Pesen-Okvur D. Step-by-step quantitative analysis of focal adhesions. MethodsX. 2014;1:56–59. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2014.06.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Koulouras G., Panagopoulos A., Rapsomaniki M.A., Giakoumakis N.N., Taraviras S., Lygerou Z. EasyFRAP-web: A web-based tool for the analysis of fluorescence recovery after photobleaching data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46:W467–W472. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky508. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Lehtimäki J.I., Fenix A.M., Kotila T.M., Balistreri G., Paavolainen L., Varjosalo M., Burnette D.T., Lappalainen P. UNC-45a promotes myosin folding and stress fiber assembly. J. Cell Biol. 2017;216:4053–4072. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201703107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Srikakulam R., Liu L., Winkelmann D.A. Unc45b Forms a Cytosolic Complex with Hsp90 and Targets the Unfolded Myosin Motor Domain. PLoS ONE. 2008;3:e2137. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Liu L., Srikakulam R., Winkelmann D.A. Unc45 Activates Hsp90-dependent Folding of the Myosin Motor Domain. J. Biol. Chem. 2008;283:13185–13193. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M800757200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Hu A., Wang F., Sellers J.R. Mutations in Human Nonmuscle Myosin IIA Found in Patients with May-Hegglin Anomaly and Fechtner Syndrome Result in Impaired Enzymatic Function. J. Biol. Chem. 2002;277:46512–46517. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M208506200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Billington N., Beach J.R., Heissler S.M., Remmert K., Guzik-Lendrum S., Nagy A., Takagi Y., Shao L., Li D., Yang Y., et al. Myosin 18A coassembles with nonmuscle myosin 2 to form mixed bipolar filaments. Curr. Biol. 2015;25:942–948. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.02.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Vasquez C.G., Heissler S.M., Billington N., Sellers J.R., Martin A.C. Drosophila non-muscle myosin II motor activity determines the rate of tissue folding. eLife. 2016;5:e20828. doi: 10.7554/eLife.20828. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Sun S.X., Walcott S., Wolgemuth C.W. Cytoskeletal Cross-linking and Bundling in Motor-Independent Contraction. Curr. Biol. 2010;20:R649–R654. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2010.07.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Ma X., Kovács M., Conti M.A., Wang A., Zhang Y., Sellers J.R., Adelstein R.S. Nonmuscle myosin II exerts tension but does not translocate actin in vertebrate cytokinesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2012;109:4509–4514. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1116268109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Laevsky G., Knecht D.A. Cross-linking of actin filaments by myosin II is a major contributor to cortical integrity and cell motility in restrictive environments. J. Cell Sci. 2003;116:3761–3770. doi: 10.1242/jcs.00684. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Vignaud T., Copos C., Leterrier C., Toro-Nahuelpan M., Tseng Q., Mahamid J., Blanchoin L., Mogilner A., Théry M., Kurzawa L. Stress fibres are embedded in a contractile cortical network. Nat. Mater. 2021;20:410–420. doi: 10.1038/s41563-020-00825-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Tavares S., Vieira A.F., Taubenberger A.V., Araújo M., Martins N.P., Brás-Pereira C., Polónia A., Herbig M., Barreto C., Otto O., et al. Actin stress fiber organization promotes cell stiffening and proliferation of pre-invasive breast cancer cells. Nat. Commun. 2017;8:15237. doi: 10.1038/ncomms15237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Burridge K., Guilluy C. Focal adhesions, stress fibers and mechanical tension. Exp. Cell Res. 2016;343:14–20. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2015.10.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Tournaviti S., Hannemann S., Terjung S., Kitzing T.M., Stegmayer C., Ritzerfeld J., Walther P., Grosse R., Nickel W., Fackler O.T. SH4-domain-induced plasma membrane dynamization promotes bleb-associated cell motility. J. Cell Sci. 2007;120:3820–3829. doi: 10.1242/jcs.011130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Barfod E.T., Moore A.L., Melnick R.F., Lidofsky S.D. Src regulates distinct pathways for cell volume control through Vav and phospholipase Cgamma. J. Biol. Chem. 2005;280:25548–25557. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M411717200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Barfod E.T., Moore A.L., Van de Graaf B.G., Lidofsky S.D. Myosin light chain kinase and Src control membrane dynamics in volume recovery from cell swelling. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2011;22:634–650. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e10-06-0514. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Suter D.M., Forscher P. Transmission of growth cone traction force through apCAM-cytoskeletal linkages is regulated by Src family tyrosine kinase activity. J. Cell Biol. 2001;155:427–438. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200107063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Tarone G., Cirillo D., Giancotti F.G., Comoglio P.M., Marchisio P.C. Rous sarcoma virus-transformed fibroblasts adhere primarily at discrete protrusions of the ventral membrane called podosomes. Exp. Cell Res. 1985;159:141–157. doi: 10.1016/S0014-4827(85)80044-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Fincham V.J., Chudleigh A., Frame M.C. Regulation of p190 Rho-GAP by v-Src is linked to cytoskeletal disruption during transformation. J. Cell Sci. 1999;112:947–956. doi: 10.1242/jcs.112.6.947. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Pawlak G., Helfman D.M. MEK Mediates v-Src-induced Disruption of the Actin Cytoskeleton via Inactivation of the Rho-ROCK-LIM Kinase Pathway*. J. Biol. Chem. 2002;277:26927–26933. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M202261200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Frame M.C. Newest findings on the oldest oncogene; how activated src does it. J. Cell Sci. 2004;117:989–998. doi: 10.1242/jcs.01111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Frame M.C., Fincham V.J., Carragher N.O., Wyke J.A. v-SRC’S hold over actin and cell adhesions. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2002;3:233–245. doi: 10.1038/nrm779. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Felsenfeld D.P., Schwartzberg P.L., Venegas A., Tse R., Sheetz M.P. Selective regulation of integrin–cytoskeleton interactions by the tyrosine kinase Src. Nat. Cell Biol. 1999;1:200–206. doi: 10.1038/12021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Lee H.-H., Tien S.-C., Jou T.-S., Chang Y.-C., Jhong J.-G., Chang Z.-F. Src-dependent phosphorylation of ROCK participates in regulation of focal adhesion dynamics. J. Cell Sci. 2010;123:3368–3377. doi: 10.1242/jcs.071555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Livne A., Geiger B. The inner workings of stress fibers - from contractile machinery to focal adhesions and back. J. Cell Sci. 2016;129:1293–1304. doi: 10.1242/jcs.180927. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Chrzanowska-Wodnicka M., Burridge K. Rho-stimulated contractility drives the formation of stress fibers and focal adhesions. J. Cell Biol. 1996;133:1403–1415. doi: 10.1083/jcb.133.6.1403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Even-Ram S., Doyle A.D., Conti M.A., Matsumoto K., Adelstein R.S., Yamada K.M. Myosin IIA regulates cell motility and actomyosin-microtubule crosstalk. Nat. Cell Biol. 2007;9:299–309. doi: 10.1038/ncb1540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Vicente-Manzanares M., Zareno J., Whitmore L., Choi C.K., Horwitz A.F. Regulation of protrusion, adhesion dynamics, and polarity by myosins IIA and IIB in migrating cells. J. Cell Biol. 2007;176:573–580. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200612043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Humphries J.D., Wang P., Streuli C., Geiger B., Humphries M.J., Ballestrem C. Vinculin controls focal adhesion formation by direct interactions with talin and actin. J. Cell Biol. 2007;179:1043–1057. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200703036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Balaban N.Q., Schwarz U.S., Riveline D., Goichberg P., Tzur G., Sabanay I., Mahalu D., Safran S., Bershadsky A., Addadi L., et al. Force and focal adhesion assembly: A close relationship studied using elastic micropatterned substrates. Nat. Cell Biol. 2001;3:466–472. doi: 10.1038/35074532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Schwarz U.S., Balaban N.Q., Riveline D., Bershadsky A., Geiger B., Safran S.A. Calculation of forces at focal adhesions from elastic substrate data: The effect of localized force and the need for regularization. Biophys. J. 2002;83:1380–1394. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(02)73909-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Lavelin I., Wolfenson H., Patla I., Henis Y.I., Medalia O., Volberg T., Livne A., Kam Z., Geiger B. Differential effect of actomyosin relaxation on the dynamic properties of focal adhesion proteins. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e73549. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Yoshigi M., Hoffman L.M., Jensen C.C., Yost H.J., Beckerle M.C. Mechanical force mobilizes zyxin from focal adhesions to actin filaments and regulates cytoskeletal reinforcement. J. Cell Biol. 2005;171:209–215. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200505018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Pasapera A.M., Schneider I.C., Rericha E., Schlaepfer D.D., Waterman C.M. Myosin II activity regulates vinculin recruitment to focal adhesions through FAK-mediated paxillin phosphorylation. J. Cell Biol. 2010;188:877–890. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200906012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Kuo J.C., Han X., Hsiao C.T., Yates J.R., 3rd, Waterman C.M. Analysis of the myosin-II-responsive focal adhesion proteome reveals a role for β-Pix in negative regulation of focal adhesion maturation. Nat. Cell Biol. 2011;13:383–393. doi: 10.1038/ncb2216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Schiller H.B., Friedel C.C., Boulegue C., Fässler R. Quantitative proteomics of the integrin adhesome show a myosin II-dependent recruitment of LIM domain proteins. EMBO Rep. 2011;12:259–266. doi: 10.1038/embor.2011.5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Hotulainen P., Lappalainen P. Stress fibers are generated by two distinct actin assembly mechanisms in motile cells. J. Cell Biol. 2006;173:383–394. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200511093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Stricker J., Beckham Y., Davidson M.W., Gardel M.L. Myosin II-mediated focal adhesion maturation is tension insensitive. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e70652. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Thievessen I., Thompson P.M., Berlemont S., Plevock K.M., Plotnikov S.V., Zemljic-Harpf A., Ross R.S., Davidson M.W., Danuser G., Campbell S.L., et al. Vinculin-actin interaction couples actin retrograde flow to focal adhesions, but is dispensable for focal adhesion growth. J. Cell Biol. 2013;202:163–177. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201303129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Liu J., Huang C., Zhan X. Src is required for cell migration and shape changes induced by fibroblast growth factor 1. Oncogene. 1999;18:6700–6706. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1203050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Seetharaman S., Etienne-Manneville S. Cytoskeletal Crosstalk in Cell Migration. Trends Cell Biol. 2020;30:720–735. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2020.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Katoh K. FAK-Dependent Cell Motility and Cell Elongation. Cells. 2020;9:192. doi: 10.3390/cells9010192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Xie Y., Wang J., Zhang Y., Liu X., Wang X., Liu K., Huang X., Wang Y. Quantitative profiling of spreading-coupled protein tyrosine phosphorylation in migratory cells. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:31811. doi: 10.1038/srep31811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Hunter T. Tyrosine phosphorylation: Thirty years and counting. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2009;21:140–146. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2009.01.028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Harney D.F., Butler R.K., Edwards R.J. Tyrosine phosphorylation of myosin heavy chain during skeletal muscle differentiation: An integrated bioinformatics approach. Theor. Biol. Med. Model. 2005;2:12. doi: 10.1186/1742-4682-2-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Efremov Y.M., Velay-Lizancos M., Weaver C.J., Athamneh A.I., Zavattieri P.D., Suter D.M., Raman A. Anisotropy vs isotropy in living cell indentation with AFM. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:5757. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-42077-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Luo Q., Kuang D., Zhang B., Song G. Cell stiffness determined by atomic force microscopy and its correlation with cell motility. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2016;1860:1953–1960. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2016.06.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Conti M.A., Adelstein R.S. Purification and properties of myosin light chain kinases. Methods Enzym. 1991;196:34–47. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(91)96006-d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Murakami N., Chauhan V.P., Elzinga M. Two nonmuscle myosin II heavy chain isoforms expressed in rabbit brains: Filament forming properties, the effects of phosphorylation by protein kinase C and casein kinase II, and location of the phosphorylation sites. Biochemistry. 1998;37:1989–2003. doi: 10.1021/bi971959a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Beach J.R., Hammer J.A., 3rd Myosin II isoform co-assembly and differential regulation in mammalian systems. Exp. Cell Res. 2015;334:2–9. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2015.01.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Shutova M.S., Spessott W.A., Giraudo C.G., Svitkina T. Endogenous species of mammalian nonmuscle myosin IIA and IIB include activated monomers and heteropolymers. Curr. Biol. 2014;24:1958–1968. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.07.070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Fenix A.M., Taneja N., Buttler C.A., Lewis J., Van Engelenburg S.B., Ohi R., Burnette D.T. Expansion and concatenation of non-muscle myosin IIA filaments drive cellular contractile system formation during interphase and mitosis. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2016;27:1465–1478. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E15-10-0725. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Shutova M.S., Asokan S.B., Talwar S., Assoian R.K., Bear J.E., Svitkina T.M. Self-sorting of nonmuscle myosins IIA and IIB polarizes the cytoskeleton and modulates cell motility. J. Cell Biol. 2017;216:2877–2889. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201705167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.