Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 5;61:102066. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102066

Table 3.

Risk for metachronous CRC after detection and removal of polyp(s) at baseline colonoscopy analysed for co-occurrence of other polyp subtypes.

Number of individuals Number of CRC cases Cases per 1000 person-years of follow-up Unadjusted HR p-value Adjusted HRa p-value
No polyps 70,468 115 (0.2%) 0.53 ref ref
HP <10 mm, without SSLs, TSAs, or adenomas 5299 5 (0.1%) 0.32 0.629 (0.257–1.541) 0.311 NA NA
Low-risk SSL without adenomas 1865 1 (0.1%) 0.20 0.414 (0.058–2.966) 0.380 NA NA
Low-risk adenomas without low-risk SSL 38,906 48 (0.1%) 0.40 0.773 (0.552–1.083) 0.135 0.771 (0.549–1.082) 0.132
Low-risk adenomas with low-risk SSL 1708 3 (0.2%) 0.66 1.381 (0.439–4.346) 0.581 NA NA
High-risk adenomas without high-risk serrated polyps 70,647 171 (0.2%) 0.68 1.218 (0.962–1.544) 0.102 1.222 (0.961–1.554) 0.101
High-risk serrated polyps without high-risk adenomas 7829 22 (0.3%) 0.89 1.679 (1.064–2.650) 0.026 1.702 (1.078–2.686) 0.022
High-risk serrated polyps with high-risk adenomas 4204 16 (0.4%) 1.08 1.917 (1.136–3.236) 0.015 2.003 (1.185–3.387) 0.010

HP: Hyperplastic polyp, SSL: Sessile serrated lesion, TSA: Traditional serrated adenoma.

a

Adjusted for age at baseline colonoscopy and sex.