One of the most common causes of death around the globe is cancer. One of the most prevalent forms of cancer is the cancer of the oral cavity and oropharynx known as oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). The susceptivity to various viruses, smoking, overindulgence in tobacco, alcohol consumption, occupational exposure, increased sun exposure, and nutritional deficiencies resulting from low socioeconomic status are the preponderant risk factors which lead to genetic and epigenetic transmutation1,2. OSCC potentially spread quickly and the initial stage is referred to as the oral potentially malignant disorder (OPMD). The OPMD symptoms are white or red lesions in the mouth, paresthesia, trismus or jaw hypomobility gradually pronounce into severe vocal changes and oral ulcers which are basically nontreatable3. This illness has the potential to spread quickly, and it can frequently invade nearby tissues4. Since the OPMD indications were usually staved off, the OSCC becomes life-threatening and is thus associated with high morbidity rates. Hence, early detection of the very early OPMD stage is very critical in order to improve the health benefits of the patient and curb the prognosis of the disease. This article provides a brief summary of diagnostic strategies in the detection of oral cancer especially using nanotechnology, and the current trends and future prospects in nanodiagnostics.
There are numerous tests available to diagnose oral and oropharyngeal cancer. Common techniques for diagnosing OSCC are endoscopy, oral brush biopsy, human papillomavirus testing, positron emission tomography scan, ultrasound, MRI, computed tomography, and radiography. Emerging detection techniques like nanodiagnostics provide advantages over the contrast agents used in modern imaging. Nanoparticles (NPs) will target specific surface molecules, are simpler to synthesize, and are more biocompatible than larger particles. Nanodiagnostics have exceptional characteristics like their size, high mechanical strength, shape, and surface. Nanomaterial-based sensors are significantly more sensitive than normal sensors. They also offer real-time tracking5, surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy, MRI, optical coherence tomography, nano-based ultrasensitive biomarker detection, Quantum Dots (QDs) imaging, photoacoustic imaging, diffusion reflection imaging, and surface plasmon resonance scattering are some of the implementations of nano-based diagnostics6. The NPs currently used in oral cancer diagnosis are listed in Table 1.
Table 1.
Nanoparticles for diagnosis of oral cancer
Nanoparticles | Description | References |
---|---|---|
Liposomes | Liposomes are extensive in diagnostic research. Compared to 18F-FDG, 64Cu liposomes are more capable to recognize tumors in the early stage | 7 |
Dendrimers | The detection of oral malignancies can be done by an attractive device, Dendrimers. Wei et al. constructed DNA-dendrimer and poly-pyrrole (DDPpy) sensors for the detection of oral cancer biomarkers such as interleukin-1 protein, interleukin-8 RNA and interleukin-8 protein, which have improved specificity and greater bioaffinity | 8 |
Gold NPs | A noninvasive, efficient method for diagnosing OSCC is SERS | 9 |
According to Xue and Wang’s study, the SERS approach could be utilized to examine and distinguish between OSCC and even the various tumor stages. Gold NPs can greatly increase the SERS spectrum’s intensities by adding to serum samples | 10 | |
For the electrochemical detection of oral cancer as an immunosensing platform, a customized AuNPs-rGO (gold-NP-reduced grapheneoxide) based bioelectrode has been designed | 11 | |
Magnetic NPs (MNPs) | For MRI contrast agents, MNPs have been researched. They also assist in refining proton relaxation, then progressively developing as a contrast in both fields of biological and medical diagnostics with useful probes | 12 |
MNPs can also be administered to the location of the tumor with precision, avoiding adjacent organs | 13 | |
Polymeric NPs | Fluorescent endoscopic detection of oral cancer has been described by Yang et al. using Highly performing NPs. The folate receptors on oral cancer cells are targeted for nanoparticle endocytosis that is improved by Folic acid conjugated chitosan NPs. By reducing the interface between chitosan and the drug, the release of 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) in oral cancer cells can be boosted by the N-succinyl chitosan (SCHI) polymer with a negative charge | 14 |
NP, nanoparticle; OSCC, oral squamous cell carcinoma; SERS, surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy.
Numerous developments have been made in the field of diagnostics as an outcome of the urgent need for sensitive, precise, strong, and quick diagnosis of oral cancer15,16. Recent developments in the field of nanotechnology offer the necessary incentive for nanobiosensor technology development17. Nanobiosensing techniques for OSCC detection are substrate selection, surface cleaning, surface enhancement by incorporation of NPs, surface enhancement by polymers, surface functionalization, biorecognition probe, and its immobilization (Fig. 1)18. In order to diagnose oral cancer, artificial intelligence is applied, such as the detection of precancerous as benign and postcancerous as malignant regions using automated deep learning CNN (Convolutional Neural Network) technique19. CNN is a deep learning algorithm. The major purpose of CNN is that it automatically identifies desired features and provide image recognition, with no human assistance. For the screening of oral cancer, deep CNNs can be a practical way to create low-cost embedded vision systems with constrained memory and processing power20. A significant advancement in recent years is the biosensor based on QDs that help with the diagnosis of some oral cancer biomarkers21. By conjugating QDs with complements of molecular biomarkers, multifunctional NP probes have been developed. QD probes can be often used to determine the molecular biomarker expression in oral cancer cells.
Figure 1.
Nanomaterial promising structures for the management of oral cancer.
It is now evident that the NPs have demonstrated great promise and success in fundamentally altering the strategy for detecting oral cancer. Also, we sought to discuss key aspects of NP synthesis such as design criteria, cutting-edge experimental techniques, and NP platforms for OSCC diagnosis. The use of unique molecular markers will aid in the future development of active targeting magnetic NPs to significantly enhance tumor localization and diagnosis.
Ethical approval
Not applicable.
Sources of funding
None.
Author contribution
D.K.S.: investigation, writing – original draft preparation. S.C.A.: data collection, visualization, and original draft preparation. R.A.N.: investigation and data curation. M.S.: conceptualization, writing – reviewing and editing and supervision. J.A.: investigation, writing – reviewing and editing and supervision. M.A.B.: conceptualization, writing – reviewing and editing and supervision.
Conflicts of interest disclosure
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Research registration unique identifying number (UIN)
None.
Guarantor
Melaku Ashagrie Belete.
Data statement
All data are available in the manuscript.
Footnotes
Sponsorships or competing interests that may be relevant to content are disclosed at the end of this article.
Published online 3 March 2023
Contributor Information
Dilip K. Shanmugam, Email: shanmugamdilipkumar@gmail.com.
Srinidhiy C. Anitha, Email: nidhiy2743@gmail.com.
Rizwan A. Najimudeen, Email: ahamedrizwannaji@gmail.com.
Muthupandian Saravanan, Email: saravanan.muthupandian@mu.edu.et.
Jesu Arockiaraj, Email: jesuaroa@srmist.edu.in.
Melaku A. Belete, Email: melakuashagrie@gmail.com.
References
- 1. Nagpal R, Nagpal N, Mehendiratta M, et al. Usage of Betel Quid, Areca Nut, Tobacco, Alcohol and Level of Awareness towards Their Adverse Effects on… Unknown. March 1, 2014. Accessed: 29 November 2021.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/260610940_Usage_of_Betel_Quid_Areca_Nut_Tobacco_Alcohol_and_Level_of_Awareness_towards_Their_Adverse_Effects_on_Health_in_a_North_Indian_Rural_Population?enrichId=rgreq-455e2bc27c05fc09d4e4c234f12f6573-XXX&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI2MDYxMDk0MDtBUzo5NTkxMDA1OTQ3MDQzODZAMTYwNTY3ODgwOTU2MA%3D%3D&el=1_x_2&_esc=publicationCoverPdf
- 2. Manoharan S, Karthikeyan S, Essa M, et al. An overview of oral carcinogenesis. Int J Nutr Pharmacol Neurologic Dis 2016;6:51. [Google Scholar]
- 3. Conway DI, Petticrew M, Marlborough H, et al. Socioeconomic inequalities and oral cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis of case-control studies. Int J Cancer 2008;122:2811–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Valdez JA, Brennan MT. Impact of oral cancer on quality of life. Dent Clin North Am 2018;62:143–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Zheng W, Zhou Q, Yuan C. Nanoparticles for oral cancer diagnosis and therapy.. Bioinorg Chem Appl 2021;2021:1–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- 6. Madhura MG, Rao RS, Patil S, et al. Advanced diagnostic aids for oral cancer. Dis Mon 2020;66:101034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Mahakian LM, Farwell DG, Zhang H, et al. Comparison of PET imaging with 64cu-liposomes and 18F-FDG in the 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene (dmba)- induced hamster buccal pouch model of oral dysplasia and squamous cell carcinoma. Mol Imaging Biol 2013;16:284–92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Wei F, Liao W, Xu Z, et al. Bio/Abiotic interface constructed from nanoscale DNA dendrimer and conducting polymer for ultrasensitive biomolecular diagnosis. Small 2009;5:1784–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Fălămas A, Rotaru H, Hedesiu M. Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) investigations of saliva for oral cancer diagnosis. Lasers Med Sci 2020;35:1393–401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Xue L, Yan B, Li Y, et al. Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy of blood serum based on gold nanoparticles for tumor stages detection and histologic grades classification of oral squamous cell carcinoma [corrigendum]. Int J Nanomedicine 2018;14:317–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Verma S, Singh A, Shukla A, et al. Anti-IL8/AuNPs-rGO/ITO as an immunosensing platform for noninvasive electrochemical detection of oral cancer. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2017;9:27462–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Shabestari Khiabani S, Farshbaf M, Akbarzadeh A, et al. Magnetic nanoparticles: preparation methods, applications in cancer diagnosis and cancer therapy. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol 2016;45:6–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Singh A, Sahoo SK. Magnetic nanoparticles: a novel platform for cancer theranostics. Drug Discov Today 2014;19:474–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Yang S-J, Lin C-F, Kuo M-L, et al. Photodynamic detection of oral cancers with high-performance chitosan-based nanoparticles. Biomacromolecules 2013;14:3183–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Li Y, St. John MA, Zhou X, et al. Salivary transcriptome diagnostics for oral cancer detection. Clin Cancer Res 2004;10:8442–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Dilip Kumar S, Aashabharathi M, KarthigaDevi G, et al. Insights of CRISPR-Cas systems in stem cells: progress in regenerative medicine. Mol Biol Rep 2021;49:1–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Singhal J, Verma S, Kumar S, et al. Recent advances in nano-bio- sensing fabrication technology for the detection of oral cancer. Mol Biotechnol 2021;63:339–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Ouyang N, Hong L, Zhou Y, et al. Application of fluorescent nano-biosensor for the detection of cancer bio-macromolecular markers. Polym Test 2022;115:107746. [Google Scholar]
- 19. Nanditha BR, MP GKAS. Oral cancer detection using machine learning and deep learning techniques. Int J Cur Res Rev 2022;14:64. [Google Scholar]
- 20. Jubair F, Al‐ karadsheh O, Malamos D, et al. A novel lightweight deep convolutional neural network for early detection of oral cancer. Oral Dis. 2022;28:1123–1130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Xu J, Yu X, Xie L, et al. Facile incorporation of DNA-templated quantum dots for sensitive electrochemical detection of the oral cancer biomarker interleukin-8. Anal Bioanal Chem 2020;412:2599–606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]