Skip to main content
NCBI home page
British Journal of Industrial Medicine logoLink to British Journal of Industrial Medicine
. 1992 Nov;49(11):782–790. doi: 10.1136/oem.49.11.782

Chronic neurobehavioural effects of elemental mercury in dentists.

C H Ngim 1, S C Foo 1, K W Boey 1, J Jeyaratnam 1
PMCID: PMC1039326  PMID: 1463679

Abstract

Neurobehavioural tests were performed by 98 dentists (mean age 32, range 24-49) exposed to elemental mercury vapour and 54 controls (mean age 34, range 23-50) with no history of occupational exposure to mercury. The dentists were exposed to an average personal air concentration time weighted average (TWA) of 0.014 (range 0.0007-0.042) mg/m3 for a mean period of 5.5 (range 0.7-24) years and had a mean blood mercury concentration of 9.8 (range 0.6-57) micrograms/l. In neurobehavioural tests measuring motor speed (finger tapping), visual scanning (trail making), visuomotor coordination and concentration (digit symbol), verbal memory (digit span, logical memory delayed recall), visual memory (visual reproduction, immediate and delayed recall), and visuomotor coordination speed (bender-gestalt time), the performance of the dentists was significantly worse than that of the controls. The dentists scored 3.9 to 38.9% (mean 13.9%) worse in these tests. In trail making, digit span, logical memory delayed recall, visual reproduction delayed recall, and bender-gestalt time test scores were more than 10% poorer. In each of the tests in which significant differences were found and in the block design time, the performance decreased as the exposed dose (product of the TWA of air mercury concentrations and the years of exposure) increased. These results raise the question as to whether the current threshold limit value of 0.050 mg/m3 (TWA) provides adequate protection against adverse effects of mercury.

Full text

PDF
782

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BERLIN M. On estimating threshold limits for mercury in biological material. Acta Med Scand Suppl. 1963;396:1–29. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Foo S. C., Jeyaratnam J., Koh D. Chronic neurobehavioural effects of toluene. Br J Ind Med. 1990 Jul;47(7):480–484. doi: 10.1136/oem.47.7.480. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Gerstner H. B., Huff J. E. Clinical toxicology of mercury. J Toxicol Environ Health. 1977 Jan;2(3):491–526. doi: 10.1080/15287397709529452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Lamm O., Pratt H. Subclinical effects of exposure to inorganic mercury revealed by somatosensory-evoked potentials. Eur Neurol. 1985;24(4):237–243. doi: 10.1159/000115801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Langolf G. D., Chaffin D. B., Henderson R., Whittle H. P. Evaluation of workers exposed to elemental mercury using quantitative tests of tremor and neuromuscular functions. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1978 Dec;39(12):976–984. doi: 10.1080/0002889778507898. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ngim C. H., Foo S. C., Phoon W. O. Atomic absorption spectrophotometric microdetermination of total mercury in undigested biological samples. J Anal Toxicol. 1988 May-Jun;12(3):132–135. doi: 10.1093/jat/12.3.132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Piikivi L., Hänninen H., Martelin T., Mantere P. Psychological performance and long-term exposure to mercury vapors. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1984 Feb;10(1):35–41. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.2365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Reingold A. L., Dan B. B., Shands K. N., Broome C. V. Toxic-shock syndrome not associated with menstruation. A review of 54 cases. Lancet. 1982 Jan 2;1(8262):1–4. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(82)92552-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Roels H., Abdeladim S., Ceulemans E., Lauwerys R. Relationships between the concentrations of mercury in air and in blood or urine in workers exposed to mercury vapour. Ann Occup Hyg. 1987;31(2):135–145. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/31.2.135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Roels H., Gennart J. P., Lauwerys R., Buchet J. P., Malchaire J., Bernard A. Surveillance of workers exposed to mercury vapour:validation of a previously proposed biological threshold limit value for mercury concentration in urine. Am J Ind Med. 1985;7(1):45–71. doi: 10.1002/ajim.4700070106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Rosenman K. D., Valciukas J. A., Glickman L., Meyers B. R., Cinotti A. Sensitive indicators of inorganic mercury toxicity. Arch Environ Health. 1986 Jul-Aug;41(4):208–215. doi: 10.1080/00039896.1986.9938335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Smith R. G., Vorwald A. J., Patil L. S., Mooney T. F., Jr Effects of exposure to mercury in the manufacture of chlorine. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1970 Nov-Dec;31(6):687–700. doi: 10.1080/0002889708506315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Soleo L., Urbano M. L., Petrera V., Ambrosi L. Effects of low exposure to inorganic mercury on psychological performance. Br J Ind Med. 1990 Feb;47(2):105–109. doi: 10.1136/oem.47.2.105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Uzzell B. P., Oler J. Chronic low-level mercury exposure and neuropsychological functioning. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1986 Oct;8(5):581–593. doi: 10.1080/01688638608405177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Verberk M. M., Sallé H. J., Kemper C. H. Tremor in workers with low exposure to metallic mercury. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1986 Sep;47(9):559–562. doi: 10.1080/15298668691390232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Journal of Industrial Medicine are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES