Skip to main content
The British Journal of Ophthalmology logoLink to The British Journal of Ophthalmology
. 1980 Jan;64(1):24–29. doi: 10.1136/bjo.64.1.24

Comparison of Snellen acuity, VER acuity, and Arden grating scores in macular and optic nerve diseases.

H W Skalka
PMCID: PMC1039342  PMID: 7356929

Abstract

Patients with various macular and optic nerve abnormalities underwent Snellen acuity, transient VER acuity, and Arden grating testing. Snellen acuity was the coarsest of the 3 evaluations, generally falling after Arden scores and VER acuity had already undergone significant degradation. The Arden gratings appeared to be the most sensitive of the 3 tests, equalling VER performance in optic nerve diseases and surpassing it in macular diseases. Variations in results between the different tests are generally understandable if one considers the functions tested by each and the anatomical derangements caused by the diseases in question. The Arden grating test appears to be an excellent and sensitive screening test for central visual disturbances.

Full text

PDF
24

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Arden G. B., Gucukoglu A. G. Grating test of contrast sensitivity in patients with retrobulbar neuritis. Arch Ophthalmol. 1978 Sep;96(9):1626–1629. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1978.03910060260015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Arden G. B. The importance of measuring contrast sensitivity in cases of visual disturbance. Br J Ophthalmol. 1978 Apr;62(4):198–209. doi: 10.1136/bjo.62.4.198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Halliday A. M., McDonald W. I., Mushin J. Visual evoked response in diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Br Med J. 1973 Dec 15;4(5893):661–664. doi: 10.1136/bmj.4.5893.661. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Millodot M., Riggs L. A. Refraction determined electrophysiologically. Responses to alternation of visual contours. Arch Ophthalmol. 1970 Sep;84(3):272–278. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1970.00990040274003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Milner B. A., Regan D., Heron J. R. Differential diagnosis of multiple sclerosis by visual evoked potential recording. Brain. 1974 Dec;97(4):755–772. doi: 10.1093/brain/97.1.755. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Sokol S., Jones K. Implicit time of pattern evoked potentials in infants: an index of maturation of spatial vision. Vision Res. 1979;19(7):747–755. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(79)90150-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of Ophthalmology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES