Skip to main content
The British Journal of Ophthalmology logoLink to The British Journal of Ophthalmology
. 1981 Jun;65(6):396–400. doi: 10.1136/bjo.65.6.396

A specular microscopic study of families with endothelial dystrophy.

J I Schnitzer, J H Krachmer
PMCID: PMC1039532  PMID: 6973355

Abstract

A prospective study of 12 families in which the proband had Fuchs's dystrophy was undertaken. Forty-four relatives were examined with the clinical specular microscope. Nine relatives, all women over 40 years of age, were affected. The mean endothelial cell density for unaffected relatives was 2889 cells/mm2 in the right eye and 2923 cells/mm2 in the left eye. Variability in endothelial cell size was not present in unaffected relatives but was present in those relatives with cornea guttata. Endothelial cell density decreased with age. The mean corneal thickness for unaffected and affected relatives was 0.51 mm and 0.53 mm, respectively. Unaffected relatives were compared with a control group with respect to endothelial cell density and corneal thickness. No significant difference was found between the 2 groups. In this study the clinical specular microscope failed to differentiate between controls and relatives of patients with Fuchs's dystrophy who at the time of examination did not have endothelial dystrophy. The instrument, therefore, could not be used to identify endothelial characteristics not visible with the slit-lamp which might be the forerunner of endothelial dystrophy.

Full text

PDF
396

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Blackwell W. L., Gravenstein N., Kaufman H. E. Comparison of central corneal endothelial cell numbers with peripheral areas. Am J Ophthalmol. 1977 Oct;84(4):473–476. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(77)90437-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bourne W. M., Kaufman H. E. Specular microscopy of human corneal endothelium in vivo. Am J Ophthalmol. 1976 Mar;81(3):319–323. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(76)90247-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bourne W. M., Kaufman H. E. The endothelium of clear corneal transplants. Arch Ophthalmol. 1976 Oct;94(10):1730–1732. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1976.03910040504008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Forstot S. L., Blackwell W. L., Jaffe N. S., Kaufman H. E. The effect of intraocular lens implantation on the corneal endothelium. Trans Sect Ophthalmol Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol. 1977 Mar-Apr;83(2):195–203. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hirst L. W., Snip R. C., Stark W. J., Maumenee A. E. Quantitative corneal endothelial evaluation in intraocular lens implantation and cataract surgery. Am J Ophthalmol. 1977 Dec;84(6):775–780. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(77)90495-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hoffer K. J. Vertical endothelial cell disparity. Am J Ophthalmol. 1979 Mar;87(3):344–349. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(79)90075-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Krachmer J. H., Purcell J. J., Jr, Young C. W., Bucher K. D. Corneal endothelial dystrophy. A study of 64 families. Arch Ophthalmol. 1978 Nov;96(11):2036–2039. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1978.03910060424004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Mishima S., Hedbys B. O. Measurement of corneal thickness with the Haag-Streit pachometer. Arch Ophthalmol. 1968 Dec;80(6):710–713. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1968.00980050712005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of Ophthalmology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES