Skip to main content
The British Journal of Ophthalmology logoLink to The British Journal of Ophthalmology
. 1981 Aug;65(8):518–524. doi: 10.1136/bjo.65.8.518

The Arden grating acuity: effect of age and optical factors in the normal patient, with prediction of the false negative rate in screening for glaucoma.

H Singh, R L Cooper, V A Alder, G J Crawford, A Terrell, I J Constable
PMCID: PMC1039572  PMID: 7295612

Abstract

The Arden contrast sensitivity was investigated in normal persons, cataract eyes, and glaucoma patients with only plates 6 and 7 of the Arden grating set. The mean score of 90 normal eyes on plate 6 was 9.50 +/- 2.29 and on plate 7 it was 9.44 +/- 2.32. The mean scores of patients with early cataract were 14.51 +/- 2.99 on plate 6 and 13.74 +/- 3.26 on plate 7. Several patients with cataract missed the grating on plate 7. Mydriasis and miosis did not affect contrast sensitivity in normal eyes. Mydriasis significantly improved contrast sensitivity in patients with early cataract. In patients with glaucoma enlargement of the pupil from a miotic state to near normal size significantly improved contrast sensitivity. It is predicted that if plate 6 and 7 are used in mass screening for glaucoma in the elderly, there will be a false negative rate of 83% for plate 6 and 52% for plate 7. A false positive rate of 17% is predicted.

Full text

PDF
518

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Arden G. B., Jacobson J. J. A simple grating test for contrast sensitivity: preliminary results indicate value in screening for glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1978 Jan;17(1):23–32. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Arden G. B. The importance of measuring contrast sensitivity in cases of visual disturbance. Br J Ophthalmol. 1978 Apr;62(4):198–209. doi: 10.1136/bjo.62.4.198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Atkin A., Bodis-Wollner I., Wolkstein M., Moss A., Podos S. M. Abnormalities of central contrast sensitivity in glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1979 Aug;88(2):205–211. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(79)90467-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Campbell F. W., Green D. G. Optical and retinal factors affecting visual resolution. J Physiol. 1965 Dec;181(3):576–593. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1965.sp007784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cooper R. L., Constable I., Terrell A. Mass screening of glaucoma and other eye disease using the Arden grating test. Aust J Ophthalmol. 1980 May;8(2):131–137. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.1980.tb01671.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hess R., Woo G. Vision through cataracts. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1978 May;17(5):428–435. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Sjöstrand J., Frisén L. Contrast sensitivity in macular disease. A preliminary report. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1977 Jun;55(3):507–514. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.1977.tb06128.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Skalka H. W. Effect of age on Arden grating acuity. Br J Ophthalmol. 1980 Jan;64(1):21–23. doi: 10.1136/bjo.64.1.21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of Ophthalmology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES