Skip to main content
African Health Sciences logoLink to African Health Sciences
. 2023 Mar;23(1):686–692. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v23i1.73

Imaging of developmental delay in black African children: A hospital-based study in Yaoundé-Cameroon

Seraphin Nguefack 1, Nasser Ndongafack Fongue 2, Daniel Armand Kago Tague 1, Ulrich Igor Mbessoh Kengne 2, Jean Roger Mouliom Tapouh 3, Félicitée Nguefack 1, Andreas Chiabi 1, Boniface Moifo 4
PMCID: PMC10398464  PMID: 37545916

Abstract

Background

The purpose of this study was to describe the anomalies observed on imaging for developmental delay in black African children.

Methods

It was a descriptive cross-sectional study, which included children aged between 1 month to 6 years with developmental delay and had done a brain MRI and/or CT scan.

Results

We included 94 children, 60.6% of whom were males. The mean age was 32.5 ± 6.8 months. A history of perinatal asphyxia found in 55.3% of cases. According to the Denver developmental II scale, profound developmental delay observed in 35.1% of cases, and severe developmental delay in 25.5%. DD was isolated in 2.1% of cases and associated with cerebral palsy, pyramidal syndrome, and microcephaly in respectively 83%, 79.8%, and 46.8% of cases. Brain CT scan and MRI accounted for 85.1% and 14.9% respectively. The tests were abnormal in 78.7% of the cases, and cerebral atrophy was the preponderant anomaly (cortical atrophy = 80%, subcortical atrophy = 69.3%). Epileptic patients were 4 times more likely to have abnormal brain imaging (OR = 4.12 and p = 0.05),. We did not find a link between the severity of psychomotor delay and the presence of significant anomalies in imaging.

Conclusion

In our context, there is a high prevalence of organic anomalies in the imaging of psychomotor delay, which were dominated by cerebral atrophy secondary to hypoxic ischemic events.

Keywords: developmental delay, brain MRI, CT scan, children

Introduction

Psychomotor delay is a retardation in the development of the child's faculties with respect to language, motor skills, and social development, compared to the norms defined for its age 13. Although according to recent epidemiological data it constitutes 1 to 3% of global morbidity, there is still a geographical variability of the morbid burden attributable to it 4. In countries with low economic resources like Cameroon, this prevalence appears to be higher, and estimated at 7% according to a hospital-based study conducted by Nguefack et al in 2013 1. This is to say that developmental delay is not scarce, and also represents a major health issue. The resort to neuroradiological examinations (MRI and CT) is of fundamental necessity in the etiologic investigation approach for children's psychomotor regression 5,6. The identification of this aetiology makes possible to optimize the management of these patients and also, identifying the underlying organic anomaly is of a prognostic interest 3,7,8. Additionally, because it enables the establishment of an organic cause of psychomotor delay and precedes the realization of more specific tests such as molecular biology, when necessary, recent works recommend brain MRI as gold standard3,5,6,911. However, CT scan is an acceptable alternative in the absence of MRI and for the search of cerebral calcifications5,6,8,9.

In Cameroon, several studies have already been carried out on developmental delay, but none has been devoted to etiological research. Our context characterized by the availability of CT scans, the recent introduction of MRI, and the virtual inaccessibility of molecular biology and genetics techniques. In this context, we undertook this study to describe the anomalies observed on imaging of developmental delay in Yaounde Gynaeco-Obstetric and Pediatric Hospital.

Methods

Study setting and study design

We conducted a descriptive cross-sectional study over a period of 09 months, from 1st September 2017 to 30 June 2018, in the pediatric neurology unit of the Yaounde Gynaeco-Obstetric and Pediatric Hospital during the follow up in the outpatient clinic.

Sample

Sampling was consecutive and non-exhaustive. The study consecutively included all children aged 1 month to 6 years with a developmental delay based on clinical examination, who had performed a brain MRI and/or CT scan. Patients whose psychomotor regression was secondary to head trauma and those whose guardians had not consented to their participation in the study were excluded.

IRB Approval

The Institutional Ethics and Research Committee of the Yaoundé Gynaeco-Obstetric and Pediatric Hospital and Faculty of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences of the University of Yaounde I approved the study.

Data collection method and tool

After obtaining the informed consent of the guardians, the data were collected by interviewing the guardians and a complete neurological and general clinical examination was performed. A consensual interpretation of the brain MRI and CT scans of the selected patients was performed by a neuro-pediatrician and a pediatric radiologist. The variables studied were sociodemographic, past history, clinical and radiological. Regarding clinical variables, microcephaly was considered as a head circumference (HC) <-2 Z-score on WHO growth curves. Severe acute malnutrition was defined as a weight-for-height ratio (W/H) <-3 Z-score on WHO growth charts. Growth retardation was defined by a length/height for age ratio (L/A) <-2 Z-score on WHO curves. The evaluation of the level of psychomotor development was carried out using the Denver II scale, which is a scale that evaluates the level of psychomotor development in 04 items: gross motor skills, fine motor skills, language and social contact12. The development quotient (QD) was calculated from the formula: Developmental Quotient = (Developmental Age/Real Age) x 100. The psychomotor delay was classified according to the WHO in mild (50≤QD≤69), moderate (35≤QD≤49), severe (20≤QD≤34) and profound (QD<20).

Statistical analysis

Data was analyzed using SPSS software version 23.0. The Chi-2 test was performed to make comparisons between categorical variables. A p-value <5% was considered as statistically significant.

Results

We included 94 children aged under 6 years, 57 of whom were boys (60.6%), a sex ratio of 1.54. The mean age was 32.5 ± 6.8 months and patients aged 2 to 6 years accounted for 61.7% of the sample. The main past history found were perinatal asphyxia in 52 cases (55.3%), congenital microcephaly in 6 cases (6.4%), and 5 cases of viral infection (CMV) in pregnancy (5.3%). Evaluation of development with the Denver II scale found 33 children (35.1%) with profound development delay and 25.5% were severe.

Concerning clinical features, we found that 78 children had cerebral palsy (83%), 75 (79.8%) a pyramidal syndrome, 44 (46.8%) a microcephaly, 32 (34.0%) an epilepsy, 28 (29.8%) a growth retardation, 7 (7.4%) a severe acute malnutrition, 6 (6.4%) a choreoathetosis, and 5 (5.3%) had a facial dysmorphism.

The 94 imaging examinations consisted of 85.1% (n= 80) brain CT scans and 14.9% (n= 14) brain MRIs. The prevalence of anomalies on imaging was 78.7%. The main etiologies observed were cortical atrophy (80%) and subcortical atrophy (69.3%) secondary to a hypoxic ischemic event (Figure 1), congenital CMV infection (10.7%) (Figure 2), corpus callosum agenesis (4%) (Figure 3), and adrenoleukodystrophy (4%) (Figure 4). Table 1 shows the distribution of patients according to anomalies observed in cerebral imaging.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

diffuse cortico-cortical atrophy associated with multiple porencephalic cavities and cerebral softening

Figure 2.

Figure 2

hydrocephalus, with sequential subependymal chain calcifications of cytomegalovirus embryofetopathy

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Brain CT without injection in sagittal and axial parenchymal window: left cortical and subcortical parafalcoreal hypodensity, associated with colpocephaly, complete agenesis of the corpus callosum and agenesis of vermis

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Brain MRI without contrast injection in axial section T1, T2 and FLAIR sequence: T2 and FLAIR hyperintensity of the deep white matter bilaterally and symmetrically and T1 hyposignal associated with corpus callosum involvement compatible with adrenoleukodystrophy

Table 1.

Distribution of patients according to the etiologies observed in cerebral imaging

Etiologies Number (%)
Hypoxic ischemic sequalae
Cortical Atrophy 60 (80.0)
Sub cortical Atrophy 52 (69.3)
Cortical and sub cortical Atrophy 49 (65.3)
Cortical and sub cortical atrophy with area of porencephaly 18 (24.0)
Cortical and sub cortical Atrophy with Watershed hypodensity 13 (17.3)
Cerebral malformation
Agenesis of the corpus callosum 3 (4.0)
Vermian agenesis 3 (4.0)
Congenital CMV infection 8 (10.7)
Metabolic disease
Adrenoleukodystrophy 3 (4.0)
Hydrocephalus 4 (5.3)
Neurodegenerative disease 3 (4.0)

Epileptic patients were 4 times more likely to have abnormal brain imaging (OR= 4.12 and p= 0.05), whereas those with chorea-athetosis were 20 times more likely to have normal brain imaging (OR= 0.05 and p= 0.01). We did not find any link between the severity of psychomotor delay and the presence of significant abnormalities in imaging (Table 2).

Table 2.

Association between clinical feature, degree of developmental delay and abnormal imaging

Abnormal imaging
Variables Yes
n (%)
No
n (%)
OR (IC 95%)
Clinical abnormalities
Epilepsy 29 (90.6) 3 (9.4) 4.12 (0.98–17.38) *
Microcephaly 0 (0.0) 2 (100) 2.44 (0.76–7.85)
Choreoathetosis 1 (16.7) 5 (83.3) 0.05 (0.01–0.53) **
Degree of developmental delay
Mild 14 (73.7) 5 (26.3) 0.7 (0.22–2.48)
Moderate 16 (88.9) 2 (11.1) 2.48 (0.57–17.17)
Severe 18 (75) 6 (25) 0.75 (0.25–2.41)
Profound 26 (78.8) 7 (21.2) 1.01 (0.36–2.99)
*

p= 0.05

**

p= 0.01

Discussion

In this study on the imaging of developmental delay in children, we report data on the clinical profile and the etiologies observed in the brain MRIs and CT scans of 94 children followed up at the pediatric neurology unit of the Yaounde Gynaeco-obstetric and Pediatric Hospital.

Our study reports an average age of 32.5 ± 6.8 months, with a male predominance (60.6%). It is indeed at this age, as noted by Nguefack and Amadou, that most parents notice and get upset about delays in psychomotor acquisitions of their offspring 1,13. Estrogen appears to play a protective role in the female fetal brain against ischemia and anoxia 14, which explains the preponderance of male cases that we observe in most studies 15.

In Cameroon, perinatal asphyxia is also positioned as the main risk factor for psychomotor delays in children 1. The irreversible lesions that hypoxic ischemic events cause on the cells of the central nervous system are also responsible for the clinical manifestations of cerebral palsy (83%) and epilepsy (34%), which the literature corroborates1,16,17.. Van Karnebeek et al reported a prevalence of 18%18, while it was 46.8% in our study. This difference can be accounted for by the frequency of perinatal asphyxia in our environment, responsible for cerebral atrophy of hypoxic ischemic origin by destruction of neuronal and glial fibers, which in turn induces precocious fusion of skull sutures. As for the growth retardation in children with developmental delay, a contrast is clearly visible between the 29.8% reported by our study and the 2% of the Aloui et al 9. The high prevalence of cerebral palsy in our environment could explain this difference in frequency. Nguefack et al reported that underweight and growth retardation were the most common forms of malnutrition in children with cerebral palsy 15. It is also well established that the poor growth and weight of children with cerebral palsy have multifactorial etiologies, associating nutritional factors related to poor nutrient intake (pharyngeal motor disorders), environmental factors, and endocrine factors including growth hormone deficiency 19. Denver developmental screening test II (DDSTII) is one of the most widely used scales in the developmental assessment of children with neurological disorders 1,12,14. However, it is clear that many studies that have focused on the theme of psychomotor delay of the child didn't mention the distribution of patients according to the severity of the condition. Therefore, the proportions of 35.1% and 25.5% for profound and severe developmental delay respectively were prominent in our sample.

The unavailability and financial accessibility of the MRI still remain a challenge in many countries of sub-Saharan Africa, which favors the use of CT scan 13. This explains why of the 94 imaging examinations performed, there were 80 (85.1%) brain CT scans and 14 (14.9%) brain MRI scans. In 78.7% of cases, imaging was abnormal. This is a highly frequent finding that is not unique to our context because many studies conducted in Asia, Europe, India, and America all report a prevalence above 50%4,6,9,10,13,20.

Similarly, concerning the etiologies observed, cerebral atrophy (cortical and subcortical) and cerebral malformations were found to be the majority in our study as well as in the literature 4,6,7,13,17.

On the other hand, due to a small sample size of choreoathetosis, (), this clinical sign is rather associated with the absence of anomalies in brain imaging. There are abnormalities associated with bilirubin encephalopathy on MRI in the globus palladus 20. Finally, like Kjos et al 21, we did not find any link between the severity of psychomotor retardation and the presence of abnormalities on imaging that was possible because that anomalies might have been missed as most participants only had CT scans done which might miss abnormalities.

Conclusion

In our context, we have a high prevalence of organic anomalies in imaging, which are dominated by cerebral atrophy due to hypoxic ischemic events. These findings support the systematic realization of a brain MRI or alternatively a brain CT scan for every child presenting with psychomotor retardation.

Acknowledgements

Our deep gratitude goes to the participants for their contribution.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest in relation to this article.

References

  • 1.Nguefack S, Kamga KK, Moifo B, Chiabi A, Mah E, Mbonda E. Causes of developmental delay in children of 5 to 72 months old at the child neurology unit of Yaounde Gynaeco-Obstetric and Paediatric Hospital (Cameroon) Open J Pediatr. 2013 Aug 13;03(03):279–285. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bhattacharya PH. Developmental delay among children below two years of age: a cross-sectional study in a community development block of Burdwan district, West Bengal. Bengal Artic Int J Community Med. 2017;4(5):1762–1767. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Özmen M, Tatli B, Aydinli N, Çalişkan M, Demirkol M, Kayserili H. Etiologic Evaluation in 247 Children with Global Developmental Delay at Istanbul, Turkey. J Trop Pediatr. 2005 Oct 1;51(5):310–313. doi: 10.1093/tropej/fmi023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Moifo B, Nguefack S, Zeh OF, Obi F, J TJ, Mah E, et al. Computed tomography findings in cerebral palsy in Yaoundé – Cameroon. J Afr Imag Méd. 2013 Jul;5(3):134–142. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Grévent D, Calmon R, Brunelle F, De Lonlay P, Valayannopoulos V, Desguerre I, et al. Imagerie du retard mental. Med Ther Pediatr. 2013 Jul 1;16(3):238–251. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Shevell M, Ashwal S, Donley D, Flint J, Gingold M, Hirtz D, et al. Practice parameter: Evaluation of the child with global developmental delay: Report of the quality standards subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and The Practice Committee of the Child Neurology Society. Neurology. 2003 Feb 11;60(3):367–380. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000031431.81555.16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Shevell MI, Majnemer A, Rosenbaum P, Abrahamowicz M. Etiologic determination of childhood developmental delay. Brain Dev. 2001 Jul 1;23(4):228–235. doi: 10.1016/s0387-7604(01)00212-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Curry CJ, Stevenson RE, Aughton D, Byrne J, Carey JC, Cassidy S, et al. Evaluation of mental retardation: Recommendations of a consensus conference. Am J Med Genet. 1997 Nov 12;72(4):468–477. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1096-8628(19971112)72:4<468::aid-ajmg18>3.0.co;2-p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Aloui N, Bellagha I, Hammou A. Retard psychomoteur chez l'enfant. Apport de l'imagerie par résonance magnétique. À propos de 100 observations. J Pediatr Pueric. 2004 Aug 1;17(5):246–248. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Sandler AD, Brazdziunas D, Cooley WC, González De Pijem L, Hirsch D, Kastner TA, et al. Developmental surveillance and screening of infants and young children. Pediatrics. 2001;108(1):192–196. doi: 10.1542/peds.108.1.192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Rocha AF da, Leite C da C, Rocha FT, Massad E, Cerri GG, Angelotti SA de O, et al. Mental retadation: a MRI study of 146 Brazilian children. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2006 Jun;64(2a):186–192. doi: 10.1590/s0004-282x2006000200003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Frankenburg WK, Dodds J, Archer P, Shapiro H, Bresnick B. The Denver II: A major revision and re-standardization of the Denver Developmental Screening Test. Pediatrics. 1992;89(1) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Amadou A, Sonhaye L, Assih K, Hemou M, Kombate D, D'almeida D, et al. Imagerie Des Retars Psychomoteurs De L'enfant a Lome. Eur Sci Journal, ESJ. 2017 Sep 30;13(27) [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Dos Santos RS, Araújo APQC, Porto MAS. Jornal de Pediatria. Vol. 84. Elsevier Editora Ltda; 2008. Early diagnosis of abnormal development of preterm newborns: Assessment instruments; pp. 289–299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Nguefack S, Tchiffo AN, Chelo D, Chiabi A, Mah E, Dongmo F, et al. Croissance staturo-pondérale des enfants souffrant d'infirmité motrice cérébrale à Yaoundé, Cameroun. Pan Afr Med J. 2015;22(204):8–14. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kerkeni A, Babay N, Sebai R, Trabelsi S, Hammami N, Drissi C, et al. NRP-WS-1 Apport de l'IRM dans l'exploration des retards mentaux. J Radiol. 2009 Oct;90(10):1553. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Nguefack S, Tchiffo AN, Chiabi A, Mah E, Enoh J, Moifo B, et al. Aspects Cliniques et Étiologiques des Infirmités Motrices Cérébrales chez l'Enfant À Yaoundé: À Propos De 134 Cas à l'Hôpital Gynéco-Obstétrique et Pédiatrique de Yaoundé (Cameroun) Health Sci. Dis. 2015 Mar;16(1):1–4. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.van Karnebeek CDM, Scheper FY, Abeling NG, Alders M, Barth PG, Hoovers JMN, et al. Etiology of Mental Retardation in Children Referred to a Tertiary Care Center: A Prospective Study. Am J Ment Retard. 2005 Jul 1;110(4):253–267. doi: 10.1352/0895-8017(2005)110[253:EOMRIC]2.0.CO;2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Sarı S, Yavuz A, Batur A, Bora A, Caksen H. Brain magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance spectroscopy findings of children with kernicterus. Polish J Radiol. 2015 Feb 11;80(1):72–80. doi: 10.12659/PJR.892643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Usman F, Diala U, Shapiro S, Le Pichon J-B, Slusher T. Acute bilirubin encephalopathy and its progression to kernicterus: current perspectives. Res Reports Neonatol. 2018 Mar 7;8:33–44. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.B O Kjos 1 RUAJB, author. Brain MR imaging in children with developmental retardation of unknown cause: results in 76 cases. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1990 Sep;11(5):1035–1040. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from African Health Sciences are provided here courtesy of Makerere University Medical School

RESOURCES