Abstract
Viral infections of the central nervous system (CNS) are common worldwide and result in considerable morbidity and mortality associated with neurologic illness. Until now, there have been no epidemiologic data regarding viruses causing aseptic meningitis, encephalitis, and CNS infections in Egypt. We investigated 1735 archived cerebrospinal fluid samples collected from Egyptian patients between 2016 and 2019 and performed molecular characterization for infection for12 different viruses: herpes simplex viruses 1 and 2 (HSV-1 and HSV-2), varicella-zoster virus (VZV), Epstein–Barr virus (EBV), cytomegalovirus (CMV), human herpesviruses 6 and 7 (HHV-6 and HHV-7), human enteroviruses (HEVs), human parechovirus (HPeV), parvovirus B19 (B19V), adenovirus (AdV), and mumps virus (MuV). All included samples were negative for bacterial infection. Our results indicated a relatively high prevalence of viral infection, with HEVs being the most prevalent viruses, followed by HSV-1, EBV, and then HSV-2. The highest prevalence was among male patients, peaking during the summer. Data obtained from this study will contribute to improving the clinical management of viral infections of the CNS in Egypt.
Introduction
Infection of the central nervous system (CNS) by several viruses can cause neurologic illnesses, including meningitis, encephalitis, encephalomyelitis, and others. The estimated number of viral CNS infections annually is approximately 20–30 per 100,000 individuals [1]. Viral meningitis is the most common of these CNS infections, particularly in young children, in whom it is caused by enteroviruses, herpes simplex viruses, mumps, and measles. The prevalence of viral CNS infections varies with geographic area, sex, and age. CNS infections may differ in their severity, signs, symptoms, and etiology [2] and can occur across a wide age range, although they are more common in children. Physicians must be sufficiently familiar with these different outcomes and causes of viral infection in order to give a proper prognosis and to prescribe the appropriate treatment with the proper timing, thereby avoiding unnecessary antibiotic usage and preventing negative effects on the CNS.
The etiology of CNS infections may involve pathogens, such as bacteria, fungi, protozoa, and viruses, or non-infectious causes, such as physical injury, tumors, or the use of certain drugs [3]. However, viral agents are reported to cause more infections annually when compared to other pathogens. The incidence of viral meningitis has been reported to be approximately 28 cases per 100,000 in children younger than 14 years [4] and approximately 8 cases per 100,000 in adults [5]. Also, an incidence of 7.6 cases of aseptic meningitis per 100,000 persons was recorded and most of cases caused by viruses [1, 5].
Virus families associated with CNS infections include the Paramyxoviridae (e.g., measles virus and mumps virus [MuV]) [6], the Togaviridae (e.g., eastern, western, and Venezuelan equine encephalitis viruses) [7, 8], the Adenoviridae (adenovirus [AdV]) [9], the Flaviviridae (e.g., West Nile virus) [10], the Parvoviridae (e.g., parvovirus B19 [B19V]) [11], the Herpesviridae (e.g., herpes simplex viruses types 1 and 2 [HSV-1 and HSV-2], varicella-zoster virus [VZV], Epstein–Barr virus [EBV], cytomegalovirus [CMV], and human herpesviruses 6 and 7 [HHV-6 and HHV-7]) [12], 13, and the Picornaviridae (e.g., human parechovirus [HPeV] and human enteroviruses [HEVs]) [14].
Viral infections of the CNS are acquired through ingestion, breathing, or insect bites. After entering the body, the viruses infect the vascular endothelial cells, directly cross the blood–brain barrier, or enter through the unprotected parts of the blood–brain barrier [15]. At this stage, inflammation can occur in different areas of the CNS [15].
Viral infection of the CNS can be diagnosed by molecular detection of viral nucleic acid in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). A positive PCR test for a virus soon after the onset of disease can save a patient with mild symptoms from an unnecessary hospital admission [6]. However, the limitations of the molecular diagnostic units in low-to-middle-income countries can impair the proper diagnosis of CNS infections.
As a consequence of the misuse and abuse of antimicrobial agents, several multidrug-resistant forms of bacterial meningitis with high prevalence rates have been recorded [16]. To our knowledge, however, few studies have characterized the epidemiologic distribution of viral infections of the CSF in Egypt [16–18]. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to determine the prevalence of viral CNS infection among patients admitted to hospital in Egypt between 2016 and 2019, to identify the causative agents, and to investigate the distribution with respect to sex, age, and governorate.
Materials and methods
The study included a total of 1735 archived CSF samples collected from patients who tested negative for bacteriologic CNS infection and who were admitted to fever hospitals in different Egyptian governorates between February 2016 and February 2019 based on a case definition of meningitis and encephalitis. All patients experienced a sudden onset of fever with a temperature higher than 38 °C, together with one or more of the following: neck stiffness, confusion, headache, vomiting, drowsiness, seizures, difficulty in speaking, sore throat, and other signs of meningeal irritation and rash [12]. As part of the routine clinical care, a lumbar puncture was performed, and CSF samples (4–5 mL each) were drawn before the initiation of any antibiotic treatment prescribed by the hospital clinicians. The samples were preserved in liquid nitrogen at the hospitals then transported to the Central Public Health laboratories (CPHL) in Cairo, Egypt.
In this study, archived CSF samples were considered for viral identification by PCR if they tested negative for bacteriologic meningitis and encephalitis, the protein levels detected by clinical chemistry testing were lower than 100 mg/dL, and the lymphocyte counts were between 5 and 1000 cells/µL.
Multiplex quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-qPCR) was used to screen for RNA and DNA viruses in nucleic acid extracted from the CSF samples. The 12 targeted viruses were HSV-1, HSV-2, VZV, EBV, CMV, HHV-6, HHV-7, HEVs, HPeV, B19V, AdV, and MuV.
A volume of 400 μL of each CSF sample was used for total nucleic acid extraction with a Qiagen EZ1 Virus Mini Kit v2.0. After the nucleic acid had been purified, it was recovered in 60 μL of elution buffer. The FTD Neuro 9 assay (Fast Track Diagnostics), a four-tube multiplex PCR system, was used to detect the 12 viruses most responsible for causing meningitis/encephalitis, along with an internal control. The multiplex PCR technique was based on the TaqMan system [19]. For each sample, 10 μL of the extracted nucleic acid was processed on an Applied Biosystems 7500 RT-PCR System (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) and the results were collected and analysed.
Statistical analysis
Chi-square was used to compare seropositivity rates within categorical variables. P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Logistic regression was used to calculate adjusted odds ratios using all variables that were significant in bivariate analysis (Fig. 1).
Results
Of the 1735 patients for whom CSF samples were screened, 330 (19.0%) tested positive for viral infection by molecular methods. Encephalitis was diagnosed in 247 (74.8%) of these virus-positive patients, and meningitis was diagnosed in the remaining 83 (25.2%) (Table 1). Detection rates differed significantly by year, place of residence, and sex (Table 1). Viral infections of the CNS were detected regardless of the season. Highly significant differences were observed in the detection rates for viral infection by year (P < 0.0001) (Table 1).
Table 1.
Variable | No. of samples collected (%) (N = 1735) | No. of virus- positive samples (%) (N = 330) | P |
---|---|---|---|
Year | |||
2016 | 261 (15.0) | 46 (13.9) | 0.0001 |
2017 | 657 (37.9) | 134 (40.6) | |
2018 | 701 (40.4) | 144 (43.6) | |
2019 | 116 (6.7) | 6 (1.8) | |
Age (years) | |||
< 1–10 | 781 (45.0) | 145 (43.9) | 0.1676 |
11–20 | 247 (14.2) | 49 (14.8) | |
21–30 | 192 (11.1) | 41 (12.4) | |
31–40 | 161 (9.3) | 32 (9.7) | |
41–50 | 74 (4.3) | 12 (3.6) | |
51–60 | 117 (6.7) | 26 (7.9) | |
61–70 | 87 (5.0) | 17 (5.2) | |
> 70 | 76 (4.4) | 8 (2.4) | |
Sex | |||
Female | 668 (38.5) | 111 (33.6) | 0.0451 |
Male | 1067 (61.5) | 219 (66.4) | |
Place of residence | |||
Greater Cairo Region | 857 (49.4) | 177 (53.6) | 0.0009 |
Alexandria Region | 320 (18.4) | 68 (20.6) | |
Delta Region | 227 (13.1) | 32 (9.7) | |
Upper Egypt Region | 295 (17.0) | 40 (12.1) | |
Suez Canal Region | 36 (2.1) | 13 (3.9) | |
Disease | |||
Encephalitis | 1237 (71.3) | 247 (74.8) | 0.1130 |
Meningitis | 498 (28.7) | 83 (25.2) | |
Outcome | |||
Death | 228 (13.1) | 43 (13.0) | 0.80 |
Discharged | 1450 (83.6) | 275 (83.3) | |
Unknown | 57 (3.3) | 12 (3.6) |
Patients living in Greater Cairo were most vulnerable to viral infection, accounting for 53.6% of the 330 virus-positive cases (n = 177). They were followed by patients in the Alexandria region, who accounted for 20.6% of the positive cases (n = 68), and those in Upper Egypt, who accounted for 12.1% (n = 40). Of the 330 virus-positive patients, 219 (66.4%) were male. The median age of the virus-infected patients was 10 years. The fatality rate was 13% for the patients with viral meningitis (Table 1).
Fever was the most commonly reported symptom among patients with viral infection of the CNS, being reported in 95.7% of cases. This was followed by altered consciousness (in 64.3% of cases), vomiting (in 63.1%), seizures (in 59.9%), headache (in 50.8%), neck rigidity (in 36.1%), irritability (in 32.0%), and a bulging fontanel (in 12.4%) (Table 2). The etiologic profile of the viral infections showed that 9% of the patients (n = 30) had a mixed infection, whereas the remainder were infected with only a single virus (Table 2).
Table 2.
Viral PCR binary | P | Odds Ratio | 95% Confidence Interval | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Negative | Positive | Lower | Upper | ||||||
n | % | n | % | ||||||
Fever | Yes | 1331 | 96.9 | 311 | 95.7 | 0.289 | 1.393 | 0.753 | 2.579 |
No | 43 | 3.1 | 14 | 4.3 | |||||
Neck rigidity | Yes | 374 | 36.0 | 86 | 36.1 | 0.968 | 0.994 | 0.741 | 1.333 |
No | 665 | 64.0 | 152 | 63.9 | |||||
Vomiting | Yes | 737 | 61.8 | 173 | 63.1 | 0.675 | 0.944 | 0.719 | 1.238 |
No | 456 | 38.2 | 101 | 36.9 | |||||
Headache | Yes | 472 | 47.3 | 121 | 50.8 | 0.325 | 0.868 | 0.654 | 1.151 |
No | 526 | 52.7 | 117 | 49.2 | |||||
Seizures | Yes | 685 | 58.1 | 160 | 59.9 | 0.575 | 0.925 | 0.706 | 1.213 |
No | 495 | 41.9 | 107 | 40.1 | |||||
Altered consciousness | Yes | 677 | 62.9 | 157 | 64.3 | 0.677 | 0.940 | 0.704 | 1.256 |
No | 399 | 37.1 | 87 | 35.7 | |||||
Bulging fontanel | Yes | 74 | 8.6 | 25 | 12.4 | 0.094 | 0.664 | 0.410 | 1.075 |
No | 785 | 91.4 | 176 | 87.6 | |||||
Irritability | Yes | 314 | 32.3 | 70 | 32.0 | 0.922 | 1.016 | 0.742 | 1.391 |
No | 658 | 67.7 | 149 | 68.0 |
HEV was the predominant virus, being present in 37.3% of the virus-positive samples (n = 123), with a particularly high circulation rate during the summer. This was followed by HSV-1 in 16.4% of the samples (n = 54), EBV in 13.3% (n = 44), HSV-2 in 9.1% (n = 30), and HHV-6 in 5.5% (n = 18). CMV, HHV-7, MuV, and B19V occurred singly and in mixed infections with HEV, EBV, or VZV. HPeV was not found in any sample. The incidence rates for the different viruses in the study cases are shown in Fig. 2.
Among the viral encephalitis cases, infections by HSV-1, HSV-2, VZV, EBV, CMV, HHV-6, HEV, and AdV were detected. Among the viral meningitis cases, except for HPeV all of the characterized viral agents were detected.
Discussion
Viral infection of the CNS is one of the most important causes of neurologic illness. The circulatory patterns of viruses that cause CNS infections, i.e., meningitis, encephalitis, and others, are country dependent, and there is only limited epidemiologic data on the prevalence of viral CNS infections in Egypt. We used multiplex RT-qPCR to screen CSF samples for 12 viral pathogens, after confirming that the samples were negative for bacterial CNS infection. The multiplex PCR methodology represents a milestone in the rapid detection of RNA and DNA viruses in CSF, easing the diagnosis of infection and the prescription of antivirals both locally and worldwide.
Of the 1735 patients who had neurologic symptoms, 330 were confirmed to be positive for a viral pathogen. The mortality associated with viral infection of the CNS is higher than that associated with viral infections of other systems [20]. Similar to previous global reports, the case fatality rate among the virus-positive cases in our study group was 13%.
In consistent with previous studies{Kohil, 2021 #380}, viral infections were most common in young children (< 1–10 years) with 43.9% but is seen across all age groups and this could be due to a combination of immunological factors, as well as, close contact with other children, and poor hygiene habits.
The predominance of male patients with viral CNS infection in our study of cases in Egypt was consistent with the findings of other studies in different countries [20–22]. HEV was the most predominant virus in our study, being present in 37.3% of virus-positive samples, which is similar to the results reported by others [23, 24]. In our study, the frequency of infection with HEV was highest in the summer months and in patients between 4 and 17 years of age, which is also consistent with other reports [25].
Akkaya et al. [24] also found HEV to be the leading causative agent of CNS infection and to have the highest prevalence in children and in summer, although they reported AdV to be the second most predominant virus, whereas in our study AdV was detected in only five of the 330 virus-positive cases (1.5%). In our study, HSV-1, EBV, and HSV-2 followed HEV in prevalence overall, although HSV-2 and VZV were reported to be prevalent in some regions.
Kupila et al. [5] also reported HEV to be the leading cause of viral meningitis, followed by HSV-2, whereas we found HSV-1 to be the second most predominant virus, and also found HSV-1 to be one of the most common viral causes of meningitis.
VZV was reported by Kupila et al. to be the third leading cause of viral CNS infection [5], but in our study it ranked seventh, being found in only 12 of the 330 virus-positive cases (3.6%), with EBV being the third most prevalent virus. Our findings are consistent with those of [26], who reported EBV to be one of the main causes of single-virus and mixed-virus encephalitis and aseptic meningitis,
In our study, HPeV was not detected in any sample, which is in marked contrast to previous studies [27–29] that found HPeV to be the second most predominant virus causing CNS infection and an important cause of sepsis-like illness in infants. Our results may be partly explained by the finding of Harvala et al. [30] that HPeV is less frequent in sepsis or meningitis in neonates than in older patients but is associated with gastroenteritis.
Although MuV was the most common cause of viral meningitis a few decades ago, we detected it in only one sample in our study. This may be a consequence of the introduction of measles–mumps–rubella vaccine in Egypt in the 1990s.
The etiologic diagnosis was achieved in 43% of the patients with meningitis and in 17% of those with encephalitis by RT-qPCR, which is an important method for the rapid detection of RNA and DNA viruses in CSF. RT-PCR has demonstrated a specificity range of 94%–100%, and these multiplex RT-PCR assays can supplement other diagnostic tests.
In our study, 30 patients had mixed infections involving CMV, HHV-7, MuV, B19V, and/or HEV, EBV, or VZV. Dyachenko et al. [31] also reported mixed infections involving more than one virus.
This study has some limitations, including the exclusion of the West Nile virus, Japanese encephalitis virus, Tick-borne encephalitis virus, and Zika virus from our screening due to a lack of diagnostic tools. Data obtained from this study will contribute to improving the clinical management of viral infections of the CNS in Egypt.
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge all members of Central Public Health Laboratories
(CPHL) of the Ministry of Health.
Author contributions
Conceptualization, WHR, AK, and AKa; methodology and data collection, WHR, AK, MF, NYN, SS, MMA, AS, YIS, MM, MKK, EA, RG, MH, MI, RE, and NA; data curation, WHR, AK, and RE; writing—original draft preparation, WHR, AK; writing—review and editing, WHR, AK, RE, and AN, NG, MH, and AKa; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
Open access funding provided by The Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) in cooperation with The Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB). This work was supported by Central Public Health Laboratories (CPHL) of the Ministry of Health. Open access funding provided by The Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) in cooperation with The Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB). The funders had no role in study design, data collection, and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Availability of data and materials
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The study was approved by the Ministry of Health and Population Ethics committee and institutional review board (IRB).
Consent for publication
All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Wael H. Roshdy and Ahmed Kandeil contributed equally to this work.
Contributor Information
Wael H. Roshdy, Email: waelhamedroshdy@yahoo.com
Ahmed Kandeil, Email: Ahmed.Kandeil@stjude.org.
Amr Kandeel, Email: kandeelamr@yahoo.com.
References
- 1.Michos AG, Syriopoulou VP, Hadjichristodoulou C, Daikos GL, Lagona E, Douridas P, Mostrou G, Theodoridou M. Aseptic meningitis in children: analysis of 506 cases. PLoS ONE. 2007;2:e674. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bautista C. Central nervous system infections. Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am. 2013;25:ix. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2013.04.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Runde TJ, Anjum F, Hafner JW. Bacterial Meningitis. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL). 2021 [PubMed]
- 4.Rantakallio P, Leskinen M, von Wendt L. Incidence and prognosis of central nervous system infections in a birth cohort of 12,000 children. Scand J Infect Dis. 1986;18:287–294. doi: 10.3109/00365548609032339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kupila L, Vuorinen T, Vainionpaa R, Hukkanen V, Marttila RJ, Kotilainen P. Etiology of aseptic meningitis and encephalitis in an adult population. Neurology. 2006;66:75–80. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000191407.81333.00. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Romero JR, Newland JG. Viral meningitis and encephalitis: traditional and emerging viral agents. Semin Pediatr Infect Dis. 2003;14:72–82. doi: 10.1053/spid.2003.127223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Morens DM, Folkers GK, Fauci AS. Eastern equine encephalitis virus - another emergent arbovirus in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2019;381:1989–1992. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1914328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Simon LV, Coffey R, Fischer MA. Western Equine Encephalitis. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL); 2021 [PubMed]
- 9.Zhang XF, Tan CB, Yao ZX, Jiang L, Hong SQ. Adenovirus infection-associated central nervous system disease in children. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2021;40:205–208. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000003000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Abdullahi AM, Sarmast ST, Jahan N. Viral infections of the central nervous system in children: A systematic review. Cureus. 2020;12:e11174. doi: 10.7759/cureus.11174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Heegaard ED, Brown KE. Human parvovirus B19. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2002;15:485–505. doi: 10.1128/CMR.15.3.485-505.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Logan SA, MacMahon E. Viral meningitis. BMJ. 2008;336:36–40. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39409.673657.AE. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.van Riel D, Verdijk R, Kuiken T. The olfactory nerve: a shortcut for influenza and other viral diseases into the central nervous system. J Pathol. 2015;235:277–287. doi: 10.1002/path.4461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Chimunda T, Subramanian R, Smith J, Mahony A. First reported case of human parechovirus encephalitis in an adult patient complicated by refractory status epilepticus. IDCases. 2019;15:e00475. doi: 10.1016/j.idcr.2018.e00475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Verma S, Lo Y, Chapagain M, Lum S, Kumar M, Gurjav U, Luo H, Nakatsuka A, Nerurkar VR. West Nile virus infection modulates human brain microvascular endothelial cells tight junction proteins and cell adhesion molecules: transmigration across the in vitro blood-brain barrier. Virology. 2009;385:425–433. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2008.11.047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Abdelkader MM, Aboshanab KM, El-Ashry MA, Aboulwafa MM. Prevalence of MDR pathogens of bacterial meningitis in Egypt and new synergistic antibiotic combinations. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0171349. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Selim HS, El-Barrawy MA, Rakha ME, Yingst SL, Baskharoun MF. Microbial study of meningitis and encephalitis cases. J Egypt Public Health Assoc. 2007;82:1–19. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Shaker OG, Abdelhamid N. Detection of enteroviruses in pediatric patients with aseptic meningitis. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2015;129:67–71. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2014.12.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Lee CK, Chai CN, Capinpin SM, Ang A, Ng SY, Lee PL, Ng CWS, Yan G, Lee HK, Chiu LL, et al. Evaluation of the Luminex ARIES HSV 1&2 assay and comparison with the FTD Neuro 9 and in-house real-time PCR assays for detecting herpes simplex viruses. Ann Lab Med. 2018;38:440–445. doi: 10.3343/alm.2018.38.5.440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Gams Massi D, Mintyene Mintyene MRR, Magnerou AM, Eko SM, Kenmegne C, Mbahe S, Sounga Bandzouzi PE, Mbatchou Ngahane HB, Mapoure NY. Spectrum of central nervous system infections in a tertiary health care centre in Cameroon. Egypt J Neurol Psychiatr Neurosurg. 2022;58:18. doi: 10.1186/s41983-022-00454-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Akhvlediani T, Bautista CT, Shakarishvili R, Tsertsvadze T, Imnadze P, Tatishvili N, Davitashvili T, Samkharadze T, Chlikadze R, Dvali N, et al. Etiologic agents of central nervous system infections among febrile hospitalized patients in the country of Georgia. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e111393. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Ho Dang Trung N, Le Thi Phuong T, Wolbers M, Nguyen Van Minh H, Nguyen Thanh V, Van MP, Thieu NT, Van TL, Song DT, Thi PL, et al. Aetiologies of central nervous system infection in Viet Nam: a prospective provincial hospital-based descriptive surveillance study. PLoS ONE 2012. 7:e37825. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 23.Jubelt B, Lipton HL. Enterovirus/picornavirus infections. Handb Clin Neurol. 2014;123:379–416. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-53488-0.00018-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Akkaya O, Guvenc HI, Yuksekkaya S, Opus A, Guzelant A, Kaya M, Kurtoglu MG, Kaya N. Real-time PCR detection of the most common bacteria and viruses causing meningitis. Clin Lab. 2017;63:827–832. doi: 10.7754/Clin.Lab.2016.160912. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Rotbart HA. Viral meningitis. Semin Neurol. 2000;20:277–292. doi: 10.1055/s-2000-9427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Doja A, Bitnun A, Ford Jones EL, Richardson S, Tellier R, Petric M, Heurter H, MacGregor D. Pediatric Epstein-Barr virus-associated encephalitis: 10-year review. J Child Neurol. 2006;21:384–391. doi: 10.1177/08830738060210051101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Chakrabarti P, Warren C, Vincent L, Kumar Y. Outcome of routine cerebrospinal fluid screening for enterovirus and human parechovirus infection among infants with sepsis-like illness or meningitis in Cornwall, UK. Eur J Pediatr. 2018;177:1523–1529. doi: 10.1007/s00431-018-3209-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.de Crom SC, Rossen JW, van Furth AM, Obihara CC. Enterovirus and parechovirus infection in children: a brief overview. Eur J Pediatr. 2016;175:1023–1029. doi: 10.1007/s00431-016-2725-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.de Crom SC, van Hinsbergh MT, van Beijsterveldt IA, van Furth AM, Rossen JW, Obihara CC. Motor development of children after an human Parechovirus or Enterovirus infection: 24 months follow-up. Minerva Pediatr (Torino). 2021. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 30.Harvala H, Griffiths M, Solomon T, Simmonds P. Distinct systemic and central nervous system disease patterns in enterovirus and parechovirus infected children. J Infect. 2014;69:69–74. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2014.02.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Depledge DP, Cudini J, Kundu S, Atkinson C, Brown JR, Haque T, Houldcroft CJ, Koay ES, McGill F, Milne R, et al. High viral diversity and mixed infections in cerebral spinal fluid from cases of Varicella Zoster Virus encephalitis. J Infect Dis. 2018;218:1592–1601. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiy358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.