Abstract
Introduction:
Heart failure (HF) is the leading cause of death worldwide. Most large and small animal disease models of HF are based on surgical procedures. A common surgical technique to induce HF is transverse aortic constriction (TAC), which induces pressure overload. The conventional TAC (cTAC) procedure is a highly invasive surgery that is associated with severe inflammation and excessive perioperative deaths.
Aim:
To establish an improved, minimally invasive TAC (mTAC) procedure that does not require thoracotomy.
Methods and results:
Following anesthesia, mice were intubated, and a small incision was made at the neck and chest. After cutting the sternum about 4 mm, the aortic arch was approached without opening the pleural cavity. A suture was placed between the brachiocephalic artery and the left common carotid artery. This model was associated with low perioperative mortality and a highly reproducible constriction evidenced by an increased right-to-left carotid blood flow velocity ratio in mTAC mice (5.9 ± 0.2) vs. sham controls (1.2 ± 0.1; P < 0.001). mTAC mice exhibited progressive cardiac remodeling during the 8 weeks post-TAC, resulting in reduced left ventricular (LV) contractility, increased LV end-systolic diameter, left atrial enlargement and diastolic dysfunction, and an increased heart weight to tibia length ratio (mTAC: 15.0 ± 0.8 vs. sham: 10.1 ± 0.6; P < 0.01).
Conclusion:
Our data show that the mTAC procedure yields a highly reproducible phenotype consisting of LV contractile dysfunction and enlargement, combined with left atrial enlargement and diastolic dysfunction.
Potential impact of the findings:
This model may be used to test the molecular mechanisms underlying atrial remodeling associated with HF development or to evaluate therapeutic strategies to treat these conditions.
Keywords: Atrial remodeling, atrial fibrillation, heart failure, mouse model, transverse aortic constriction
Graphical Abstract
INTRODUCTION
Atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF) are both very common, progressive diseases that often co-exist, predispose to each other, and share risk factors. Both diseases share common structural alterations (e.g., fibrosis, inflammation, chamber dilatation) that point to overlapping underlying molecular mechanisms. HF is a disease characterized by the inability of the heart to supply the peripheral tissue with enough blood and oxygen for its metabolic requirements due to cardiac dysfunction[1]. HF with a preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) develops when the left ventricle becomes more rigid, and relaxation is impaired; this is most common in older people and women[2]. On the other hand, in HF with a reduced EF (HFrEF), systolic HF develops with reduced left ventricular (LV) contractility. HFrEF is often caused by high blood pressure and coronary artery disease. These risk factors are also known to cause AF, an irregular and often very rapid heart rhythm abnormality that can reduce cardiac output and promote strokes[3]. A substrate for AF often develops in the atria when the ventricles undergo adverse remodeling due to the development of HF. New and more efficient treatments are needed and require an improved understanding of the disease mechanisms. Reproducible animal models of HF are critical for both the knowledge of disease pathophysiology and the development of new treatment modalities.
A commonly used small animal model for HF is pressure overload induced by transverse aortic constriction (TAC)[4,5]. This model, first described by Rockman et al. in 1991, consists of a permanent constriction at the aortic arch that limits blood flow across the aortic valve, thus subjecting the left ventricle (LV) to increased pressure load[6]. More specifically, constriction is created between the brachiocephalic (innominate) artery and the left common carotid artery with either a surgical suture or a small rubber ring (O-ring-induced TAC)[7]. It is well established that TAC leads to ventricular remodeling that initially promotes compensated hypertrophy but eventually results in adverse cardiac remodeling, fibrosis, and systolic/diastolic dysfunction, leading to HF progression[8]. In addition, it has been shown that pressure overload can cause atrial remodeling and fibrosis[9].
Researchers commonly use the conventional surgical model of TAC (cTAC), which involves the opening of the thorax and pleural cavity[6]. We recently reported that thoracotomy per se induces cardiac abnormalities such as atrial arrhythmias, even in the absence of any overt cardiac damage[3]. To minimize the potential adverse effects of the surgical procedure on cardiac function, we characterized a minimally invasive TAC (mTAC) model in which the pleura is kept intact during the surgical procedure. This model permits the study of the effects of pressure overload on the heart, devoid of the robust inflammation process in the thorax that accompanies the cTAC surgery. The mTAC model has been previously described[10] in terms of the surgical procedure as the model of ventricular pressure overload[11]; however, the pathophysiological consequences in the different cardiac chambers have not been described. Here, we report the first in-depth analysis of chamber-specific remodeling and functional consequences of the non-invasive pressure overload procedure in the mTAC mouse model.
METHODS
Animal studies.
All studies were performed according to protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of Baylor College of Medicine, conforming to the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals published by the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH Publication No. 85-23, revised 1996). All imaging and histological studies were performed by investigators blinded to the surgical procedure performed in mice at Baylor College of Medicine.
Minimally invasive transverse aortic constriction (mTAC).
Adult 12- to 14-week-old C57BL/6J male mice were randomized to sham and mTAC groups. Slow-release (SR) Buprenorphine (1 mg/kg/72 h) and SR Meloxicam (2 mg/kg/48 h) were subcutaneously injected 1 h prior to surgery. Mice were placed in the supine position on a heating pad during surgery to maintain their body temperature at 37.0 ± 0.5 °C. Following induction of anesthesia in a chamber with 3% v/v isoflurane in 100% oxygen, mice were intubated and ventilated at a tidal volume of 150 μL and respiratory rate of 175 breaths/minute. Anesthesia was maintained with inhaled isoflurane (2% v/v, isoflurane/oxygen). A small incision of around 2 cm was made at the midline position of the neck and chest. The thyroid gland was pulled towards the head and muscle layers on the trachea were separated at the midline to both sides with the help of curved forceps. Muscles surrounding the trachea were separated from behind the sternum using blunted scissors. The sternum was cut about 4 mm, from the top down to the second rib, and retractors were used to keep the incision open. The aortic arch and both carotids were clearly visible at the lower part of the incision [Figure 1A]. Using curved blinded forceps, a tunnel was created under the aortic arch and between the first (brachiocephalic artery) and second (left common carotid artery) branches of the aorta. A non-absorbable 6-0 monofilament silk suture was crossed through the tunnel to encircle the aortic arch. A blunt 27-gauge needle was placed over the arch and used as a spacer. Then, the suture was fixed in place with a double knot and the spacer was gently removed [Figure 1A]. The chest was closed by crossing a 6-0 monofilament absorbable suture through the first intercostal space from both sides of the cut. The skin over the chest was closed using a 6-0 monofilament non-absorbable suture in a non-continuous suture pattern. Skin glue was used to ensure that the incision remained closed. The same procedure was performed in sham mice, except that no ligation was performed on the aortic arch.
Doppler measurements.
A high-frequency pulsed Doppler ultrasound system (DVFS, Indus Instruments, Webster, TX) was used to measure blood flow velocity in the carotid arteries after surgery. Doppler studies were performed one week after surgery in both carotid arteries for sham and mTAC mice [Figure 1B]. During the imaging study, mice were placed on a heating board (Rodent Surgical Monitor (RSM)+, Indus Instruments, Webster, TX) in a supine position and anesthetized with isoflurane (1.5% v/v, isoflurane/oxygen). The RSM+ board includes electrocardiographic electrodes and a heating pad. Body hair was removed for improved ultrasound coupling between the probe and the skin, and ultrasound transmission gel was applied to the skin. A 20 MHz Doppler probe was placed on both the right and left sides of the neck at about 45° angle to measure blood flow velocity in both carotid arteries. Doppler range gate depth was adjusted to 2-3 mm to obtain the optimal flow velocity signals. The probe used in this study was custom-built in Dr. Reddy’s laboratory, as described[12,13]. The ratio between right and left carotid flow (RC/LC) was used as an indicator of the severity of the constriction.
Echocardiography measurements.
Baseline echocardiography was performed 3 days prior to sham/mTAC procedures and at 2-, 4-, 6- and 8-weeks post-surgery [Figure 1B]. Mice were anesthetized with isoflurane (1.5%-2% v/v, isoflurane/oxygen). After the chest hair was removed, mice were placed on a heated platform to maintain the body temperature at 37.0 ± 0.5 °C. Echocardiography was performed using Visual Sonics Vevo 2100 with a 30 MHz frequency probe (FujiFilm VisualSonics Inc., Toronto, ON, Canada). Short-axis images of the heart in both B- and M- modes were recorded to assess systolic function. Long-axis B-mode images were captured to determine the left atrial area. Long axis and 4-chamber color Doppler/pulsed wave were used to assess pulmonary artery flow and mitral valve early (E) and after (A) wave. Long-axis imaging of the upper chest was used to image the aortic arch. All captured images were analyzed using Vevo LAB software.
Histology.
Mice were euthanized following induction of anesthesia with isoflurane (3% v/v, isoflurane/oxygen), followed by cervical dislocation and bilateral opening of the thorax. Mouse hearts were fixed with 10% buffered formalin and dehydrated in an increasing percentage of ethanol series. Both xylene and paraffin washes were used to paraffinize the samples. Paraffinized hearts were sectioned in 7 μm sections and placed on slides. Tissue sections were further deparaffinized with a decreased percentage of ethanol series and were stained with Masson’s Trichrome stain (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) to label fibrosis. Stained heart sections were imaged using a light microscope. The fibrotic area (blue-positive) was quantified using ImageJ[14].
RNA isolation and quantitative PCR (qPCR).
Total RNA was isolated from the whole heart of sham and mTAC mice. Hearts were snap frozen in liquid nitrogen and powdered. A small portion of the powder was used for RNA isolation and 400 μL of TRIzol per each sample. The Direct-zol RNA MiniPrep (Zymo Research, Irvine, CA) was used to isolate total RNA and RNA concentrations were measured using a nanodrop. RNA was stored at −80 °C. To generate cDNA, reverse transcription was carried out using the iScript Reverse Transcription Supermix (BioRad, Hercules, CA) with 500 ng of RNA per sample. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) was performed for NPPA and NPPB. A total of 20 μL reaction solution was used per well: 10 μL of SYBR Green Master Mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific), 1 μL of 4 × Yellow Sample Buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific), 1 μL of 10 μM forward primer, 1 μL of 10 μM reverse primer, 2 μL of cDNA (prepped as described above), and 5 μL of distilled water. Fold changes in gene expression were calculated using the delta-delta Ct method. Gene expression fold changes (relative to L7) in mTAC hearts were then normalized to those in sham by dividing by the average sham fold change.
Statistical analysis.
All data are expressed as mean ± SEM. GraphPad Prism 9 (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) was used to perform an unpaired Student t-test or ANOVA after performing the D’Agostino-Pearson normality test for normal data distribution. A one-way ANOVA or Kruskal-Wallis test was used for multiple group comparisons based on the data distribution. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS
A total of 17 male 12- 14-week-old mice were used for this study. Mice were randomized into the sham (n = 6) and minimally invasive transverse aortic constriction (mTAC) groups (n = 11). Following intubation, mice underwent a surgical procedure that did not require a thoracotomy and opening of the pleural cavity, as described in the methods section. Intraoperative mortality (defined as any mortality during the first 24 h after the start of the surgery) was 0% and 9% for sham and mTAC, respectively [Figure 1C]. Intraoperative mortality was mainly due to bleeding from the aortic arch during the ligation process. Postoperative mortality for the mTAC group was found to be higher during the first week after the surgery process. The survival 8 weeks after surgery was 100% and 70% for sham and mTAC, respectively [Figure 1D]. Interestingly, mTAC did not significantly increase the mortality rate compared to sham-operated mice during the postoperative follow-up period of 8 weeks (P = 0.156).
The constriction was placed between the brachiocephalic artery and the left common carotid artery and was validated by echocardiography studies [Figure 2A]. The presence of a constriction was clearly visible in all (10 out of 10) surviving mTAC mice. Additionally, high-frequency pulsed Doppler ultrasound studies were performed one week after surgery. Blood flow velocity was measured in both the right carotid (RC) and left carotid (LC) arteries. Representative recordings of the blood flow velocity from both carotid arteries in sham and mTAC mice are shown in Figure 2B. The RC blood flow velocity was much higher in mTAC mice, while LC blood flow velocity was decreased compared to sham mice. The ratio between right-to-left carotid flow velocity (RC/LC) was significantly increased 5.9-fold in mTAC mice versus the sham group [Figure 2C, P < 0.001], consistent with a moderate-to-severe rate of aortic arch constriction.
Echocardiography measurements were performed at baseline and 2-, 4-, 6-, and 8-weeks after surgery. Representative M-mode images for each time point are shown in Figure 3A. Data for both groups were similar at baseline [Figure 3 and Table 1]. Progressive systolic contractile dysfunction was observed in mTAC mice after the surgery. The ejection fraction (EF) was significantly decreased in mTAC mice compared to sham mice starting from the second week after surgery [Figures 3B, P < 0.001]. Further analysis revealed that each mTAC mouse exhibited a lower EF over time [Figure 3C]. Similarly, fractional shortening (FS) was also significantly reduced [Figure 3D, P < 0.001]. The cardiac output (CO) was also decreased in mTAC mice compared with sham mice [Table 1, P < 0.01].
Table 1.
Sham (n = 6) | mTAC (n = 7) | P-value | |
---|---|---|---|
Baseline | |||
Heart rate (bpm) | 472.7 ± 16.3 | 457.2 ± 12.0 | 0.447 |
ESV (μL) | 27.8 ± 1.28 | 30.0 ± 1.95 | 0.397 |
EDV (μL) | 82.7 ± 2.83 | 84.0 ± 3.64 | 0.794 |
SV (μL) | 54.9 ± 1.91 | 54.0 ± 2.03 | 0.754 |
CO (mL/min) | 25.9 ± 1.14 | 24.7 ± 1.21 | 0.488 |
LV mass (mg) | 106.2 ± 10.0 | 101.1 ± 8.81 | 0.710 |
LVAW;s (mm) | 1.18 ± 0.07 | 1.05 ± 0.05 | 0.123 |
LVAW;d (mm) | 0.63 ± 0.04 | 0.58 ± 0.03 | 0.353 |
2-weeks | |||
Heart rate (bpm) | 481.5 ± 19.9 | 505.3 ± 17.1 | 0.382 |
ESV (μL) | 29.5 ± 3.21 | 39.4 ± 2.77 | 0.037* |
EDV (μL) | 81.0 ± 7.95 | 77.9 ± 4.28 | 0.717 |
SV (μL) | 51.6 ± 4.9 | 38.5 ± 2.09 | 0.019* |
CO (mL/min) | 24.5 ± 1.82 | 19.3 ± 0.87 | 0.015* |
LV mass (mg) | 84.3 ± 7.80 | 123.6 ± 12.0 | 0.026* |
LVAW;s (mm) | 0.94 ± 0.04 | 1.07 ± 0.06 | 0.136 |
LVAW;d (mm) | 0.52 ± 0.04 | 0.72 ± 0.04 | 0.004* |
4-weeks | |||
Heart rate (bpm) | 494.7 ± 19.8 | 533.7 ± 17.0 | 0.160 |
ESV (μL) | 30.9 ± 2.58 | 55.8 ± 4.36 | 0.001* |
EDV (μL) | 82.9 ± 4.39 | 94.5 ± 5.18 | 0.130 |
SV (μL) | 52.0 ± 1.91 | 38.6 ± 2.05 | 0.001* |
CO (mL/min) | 25.6 ± 1 | 20.5 ± 1.02 | 0.004* |
LV mass (mg) | 85.8 ± 8.79 | 127.8 ± 9.96 | 0.010* |
LVAW;s (mm) | 0.95 ± 0.05 | 0.96 ± 0.11 | 0.946 |
LVAW;d (mm) | 0.53 ± 0.02 | 0.68 ± 0.08 | 0.118 |
6-weeks | |||
Heart rate (bpm) | 466.8 ± 17.6 | 542.6 ± 14.7 | 0.007* |
ESV (μL) | 31.7 ± 2.82 | 61.5 ± 4.48 | < 0.001* |
EDV (μL) | 80.4 ± 6.69 | 97.2 ± 3.16 | 0.036* |
SV (μL) | 48.7 ± 4.17 | 35.7 ± 2.01 | 0.013* |
CO (mL/min) | 22.6 ± 1.72 | 19.3 ± 1.14 | 0.132 |
LV mass (mg) | 95.9 ± 6.29 | 104.6 ± 5.05 | 0.301 |
LVAW;s (mm) | 1.00 ± 0.04 | 0.84 ± 0.04 | 0.012* |
LVAW;d (mm) | 0.62 ± 0.02 | 0.64 ± 0.03 | 0.456 |
8-weeks | |||
Heart rate (bpm) | 522.5 ± 18.2 | 552.2 ± 10.1 | 0.166 |
ESV (μL) | 29.9 ± 0.91 | 74.7 ± 4.64 | < 0.001* |
EDV (μL) | 78.3 ± 2.53 | 110.6 ± 6.44 | 0.001* |
SV (μL) | 48.5 ± 1.74 | 35.9 ± 2.53 | 0.002* |
CO (mL/min) | 25.3 ± 1.15 | 19.9 ± 1.58 | 0.022* |
LV mass (mg) | 95.7 ± 4.73 | 98.7 ± 8.57 | 0.772 |
LVAW;s (mm) | 0.95 ± 0.06 | 0.67 ± 0.06 | 0.005* |
LVAW;d (mm) | 0.57 ± 0.02 | 0.53 ± 0.03 | 0.387 |
Bpm, beats-per-minute; ESV: End-systolic volume; EDV: end diastolic volume; SV: stroke volume; CO: cardiac output; LV: left ventricular; LVAW;s: left ventricular anterior wall thickness in systole; LVAW;d: left ventricular anterior wall thickness in Asterisks mark statistically significant values according to the student’s t-test.
End-diastolic diameter (EDD) and end-systolic diameter (ESD) were significantly increased in mTAC mice compared to sham mice. The EDD progressively increased and became statistically significant at 8 weeks post-surgery [Figure 3E, P < 0.05]. The ESD was significantly higher in mTAC mice starting from the fourth week after surgery [Figure 3F, P < 0.001]. Stroke volume (SV) was significantly lower in mTAC mice compared to sham mice starting from the second week after surgery [Table 1, P < 0.001]. Finally, the left ventricular posterior wall diastolic diameter (LVPW;d) was increased only at 2 weeks after surgery [Figure 3G], consistent with the typical hypertrophic response, which is usually followed by progression to a decompensated dilated cardiomyopathy[15]. Subsequently, the LVPW;d and LVPW in systole (LVPW;s) were significantly lower in mTAC mice starting at 8- and 6-weeks post-surgery, respectively [Figure 3G and H], indicative of LV dilatation associated with HF development.
To assess right ventricular (RV) remodeling post mTAC surgery, we used color Doppler echocardiography to measure blood flow through the pulmonary artery. The pulsed wave Doppler ultrasound was placed over the pulmonary artery in the parasternal long-axis view to obtain the flow tracings [Figure 4A]. The peak pulmonary artery velocity (PAV) was unaltered post mTAC surgery (710.5 ± 32.1 mm/s in mTAC vs. 747.2 ± 38.5 mm/s in sham, P = 0.44) [Figure 4B]. Peak pulmonary flow pressure gradient (PAPG) was also unchanged after mTAC (2.05 ± 0.20 mmHg in mTAC vs. 2.26 ± 0.23 mmHg in sham, P = 0.45) [Figure 4C]. Finally, pulmonary artery velocity time integral (VTI) did not show a significant change after aortic constriction (20.8 ± 2.10 mm in mTAC vs. 27.04 ± 1.99 mm in sham, P = 0.1) [Figure 4D]. Overall, our data reveal that mTAC surgery does not cause RV remodeling or pulmonary hypertension in mice.
Next, atrial function and structure were assessed using echocardiographic studies. Representative long-axis echocardiography revealed clear images of the aortic root (Ao) and left atrium (LA) at 8 weeks post-surgery in mTAC and sham mice [Figure 5A]. The left atrial (LA) size was significantly larger in mTAC mice compared to sham mice [Figure 5B, P < 0.01]. No changes were observed in the right atria (RA) size in mTAC mice (not shown). The atrial contractile function was studied using echo-Doppler in mTAC mice 8 weeks after surgery [Figure 5C]. Representative Doppler images of the mitral valve’s early and late flow peaks revealed an increased mitral early to after waves (E/A) ratio in mTAC versus sham mice [Figure 5D, P < 0.01], indicating abnormal ventricular filling probably because of decreased atrial contractility.
Finally, cardiac structure was analyzed in mTAC and sham mice 8 weeks after surgery. There were no changes in body weight (BW) comparing both groups of mice [Table 2]. Heart weight (HW) was found to be significantly higher in mTAC mice than in sham mice [Table 2, P < 0.001]. Thus, mTAC mice had significant cardiac hypertrophy as indicated by a higher HW-to-BW ratio [HW/BW, Figure 6A, P < 0.01] and HW to tibia length (TL) ratio [HW/TL, Figure 6B, P < 0.01] compared to sham mice. The mTAC hearts showed higher expression levels of NPPA and NPPB compared to sham hearts [Figure 6C and D, P < 0.05]. Furthermore, lung weight (LW) was significantly greater in mTAC mice versus sham [Table 2, P < 0.01]. While there was a trend towards an increased LW-to-BW (LW/BW) ratio, this did not reach a statistically significant difference between both groups [Table 2]. However, the LW-to-TL (LW/TL) ratio was significantly higher in mTAC mice than in sham mice [Table 2, P < 0.001], consistent with pulmonary edema. To determine the contribution of fibrosis to the heart hypertrophy, histological sections from 3 sham and 5 mTAC mouse hearts were analyzed. Ventricular fibrosis was visualized by staining longitudinal cardiac sections using Masson’s trichrome [Figure 6E]. The relative area occupied by fibrosis in the left ventricle (LV) was significantly higher in hearts from mTAC mice versus sham mice [Figure 6F, P < 0.05]. However, no significant differences in atrial fibrosis were found when comparing both groups (data not shown).
Table 2.
Sham (n = 6) | mTAC (n = 7) | P-value | |
---|---|---|---|
Body weight (BW, g) | 32.4 ± 1.1 | 32.4 ± 0.8 | 0.601 |
Heart weight (HW, mg) | 184.3 ± 11.3 | 269.7 ± 11.9 | 0.001* |
Tibia length (TL, mm) | 18.3 ± 0.3 | 17.9 ± 0.1 | 0.115 |
Lung weight (LW, mg) | 153.2 ± 3.4 | 173.7 ± 7.7 | 0.004* |
LW/BW ratio | 4.7 ± 0.2 | 5.4 ± 0.2 | 0.073 |
LW/TL ratio | 8.4 ± 0.2 | 9.7 ± 0.4 | 0.001* |
Asterisks mark statistically significant values according to the student’s t-test.
DISCUSSION
In the present study, we characterized ventricular and atrial remodeling and functional alterations in an improved, minimally invasive transverse aortic constriction (mTAC) mouse model of pressure overload-induced heart failure. Key findings are (i) that intubation of the animal guarantees a high intraoperative survival rate in the mTAC model; (ii) aortic constriction increases right carotid blood flow and decreases left carotid blood flow; (iii) HF develops starting from two weeks after surgery; and (iv) mTAC induces atrial remodeling and dysfunction 8 weeks after surgery. Thus, here we show mTAC is a highly reproducible surgical model to study HF and its progression. Given that these mice also develop atrial remodeling, it would be interesting to determine whether this model could also be used to study the development of AF secondary to HF.
The most used surgical procedure to induce pressure overload is conventional TAC (cTAC), which is a very invasive procedure that includes thoracotomy[16,17]. Furthermore, cTAC has been reported to have a higher intraoperative mortality rate[8]. Thus, the mTAC procedure was developed as a less invasive model of ventricular pressure overload[10,11,18]. The perioperative mortality associated with the mTAC model was previously reported to be around 10%[10], similar to the one observed for our current procedure. This lower procedure-related mortality rate is probably related to reducing pulmonary injury, lung collapse, and inflammation. While intubation could potentially help mitigate the detrimental effects of lung collapse in the cTAC model, overall mortality still exceeds the one observed with the mTAC model. Our mTAC model was associated with a 70% postoperative survival rate, which is comparable to prior mTAC studies[10,19]. Mortality that occurred between 2 and 56 days after surgery was most likely caused by infection or complications of HF, including arrhythmogenic cardiac death and pump failure.
The present mTAC model allows for constriction of the aorta without opening the chest cavity. Such a minimally invasive, closed-chest surgical procedure makes the model more similar to the actual pathology seen in human patients[20], which improves the relevance of the mechanistic observations made in this model. As we previously demonstrated in a recent paper, the opening of the chest cavity per se induces major changes in heart function, leading to the development of arrhythmias due to the inflammatory response induced by surgery[3]. Using a closed-chest model, we minimized the activation of inflammation processes around the heart, which have been demonstrated to affect cardiac function in prior work[21].
The effectiveness of the model was assessed one week after surgery by the measurement of the RC/LC flow ratio. Our model showed a RC/LC flow ratio of 5.9, corresponding to a moderate-to-severe pressure gradient, similar to what were previously reported for the cTAC model[8]. This result supports the effectiveness of the ligation in the closed-chest TAC method. Furthermore, we found cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis in mTAC mice when collecting the hearts at 8 weeks post-surgery consistent with a HF phenotype.
It is well-known that pressure overload-TAC models are characterized by cardiac remodeling and dysfunction[22]. However, it has also been shown that the phenotype observed following cTAC in wildtype C57BL/6J mice can be highly variable, with almost 70% of animals not developing HF in one study[23]. The lack of consistency in the progression to HF could be due to aortic stenosis ranging from −0.3 to −0.6 mm[24,25]. Some authors support the use of O-rings for a more consistent constriction[7,26], but it is essential to consider that the constriction depends not only on the diameter of the ring used but also on the original diameter of the aortic arch which differs between animals. The present study did not evaluate the stenosis reached with this new procedure, but the better access to the aortic arch with this method might explain a greater consistency of the ligation. We strongly recommend a Doppler study around 1-week post-surgery to obtain a quantitative assessment of the degree of functional stenosis, which might be a better predictor of subsequent remodeling[27].
We observed that mTAC mice exhibited a progressive decrease in EF starting during the second week after surgery, like in previous studies[18,28]. In the present study, all mTAC animals that reached the endpoint developed HF, with an EF of around 30% at 8 weeks after surgery [Figure 3C]. These findings demonstrated that mTAC is an excellent model for studying the physiopathology of HF and is a consistent surgical procedure to induce HF progression.
The echocardiography techniques utilized for the study also revealed for the first time left atrial remodeling and contractile abnormalities associated with mTAC. Left atrial remodeling and contractile dysfunction may occur due to alterations in left ventricular function. In this sense, systolic[29,30] and diastolic[31,32] HF increase left atrial pressure. It has been recently shown that left atrial size is a good predictor of HF in human patients[33]. Atrial hypertrophy[9,28,34] and increased left atrial fibrosis[35,36] have been previously described in the cTAC model, but no analysis of atria structure or function has been reported so far in the mTAC model. Several studies have focused on ventricular alterations, while atrial pathology is often disregarded. Here we showed that the present pressure overload model not only induces left atrial enlargement but also left atrial contractile dysfunction. Thus, the mTAC model might be a good and reproducible model of atrial cardiomyopathy, a condition commonly observed in patients with HF[37]. Interestingly, atrial size has a significant predictive value for incident cardiovascular disease and mortality[38]. This association is not limited to patients with established cardiovascular disease but also extends to other pathologies such as cancer[39] or diabetes[40]. However, the comparison of cTAC and mTAC in the same study would demonstrate the advantages of using mTAC, which is a limitation of the present study.
In conclusion, we developed and characterized an improved, minimally invasive TAC surgical model of cardiac pressure overload that was characterized by low intraoperative mortality, consistent progressive cardiac remodeling and left ventricular contractile dysfunction, as well as left atrial cardiomyopathy. This mTAC model caused the development of HF with a reduced ejection fraction starting from two weeks post-surgery in 100% of mice. Moreover, this mTAC model developed hemodynamically significant atrial cardiomyopathy 8 weeks after the surgery. All these findings support the use of this improved mTAC model for a mechanistic understanding of HF and HF-associated AF and the development of new therapeutic drugs treating these conditions.
Financial support and sponsorship
This work is supported by NIH grants R01-HL089598, R01-147108, R01-HL153350, R01-HL160992 (to Xander H.T. Wehrens), and an American Heart Association postdoctoral fellowship (ID: 837586) to YATS. This project was also supported by the Mouse Metabolism and Phenotyping Core at Baylor College of Medicine, which is supported in part with funding from NIH (UM1HG006348, R01DK114356, R01HL130249) and using an instrument purchased with funding from NIH (S10OD032380).
Footnotes
Conflicts of interest
Xander H.T. Wehrens is a founding partner and director of Elex Biotech, a start-up company that developed drug molecules that target ryanodine receptors to treat cardiac arrhythmia disorders. Reddy AK is a consultant to Indus Instruments, the company that currently makes and sells the Doppler system and the rodent monitoring system.
Ethical approval and consent to participate
All studies were performed according to protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of Baylor College of Medicine, conforming to the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals published by the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH Publication No. 85-23, revised 1996).
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Availability of data and materials
Upon submission, authors agree to make any materials, data, code, and associated protocols available upon request.
REFERENCES
- 1.McMurray JJ, Adamopoulos S, Anker SD, et al. ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2012: The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure 2012 of the European Society of Cardiology. Developed in collaboration with the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur J Heart Fail 2012;14:803–69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bozkurt B, Coats AJS, Tsutsui H, et al. Universal definition and classification of heart failure: a report of the Heart Failure Society of America, Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology, Japanese Heart Failure Society and Writing Committee of the Universal Definition of Heart Failure: Endorsed by the Canadian Heart Failure Society, Heart Failure Association of India, Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand, and Chinese Heart Failure Association. Eur J Heart Fail 2021;23:352–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Keefe JA, Navarro-Garcia JA, Ni L, Reilly S, Dobrev D, Wehrens XHT. In-depth characterization of a mouse model of postoperative atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Aging 2022;2:40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Gunata M, Parlakpinar H. Experimental heart failure models in small animals. Heart Fail Rev 2023;28:533–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Houser SR, Margulies KB, Murphy AM, et al. Animal models of heart failure: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circ Res 2012; 111:131–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Rockman HA, Ross RS, Harris AN, et al. Segregation of atrial-specific and inducible expression of an atrial natriuretic factor transgene in an in vivo murine model of cardiac hypertrophy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1991;88:8277–81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Nakao Y, Aono J, Hamaguchi M, et al. O-ring-induced transverse aortic constriction (OTAC) is a new simple method to develop cardiac hypertrophy and heart failure in mice. Sci Rep 2022; 12:85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.deAlmeida AC, van Oort RJ, Wehrens XH. Transverse aortic constriction in mice. J Vis Exp 2010;21:1729. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Hanif W, Alex L, Su Y, et al. Left atrial remodeling, hypertrophy, and fibrosis in mouse models of heart failure. Cardiovasc Pathol 2017;30:27–37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Zaw AM, Williams CM, Law HK, Chow BK. Minimally invasive transverse aortic constriction in mice. J Vis Exp 2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Hu P, Zhang D, Swenson L, Chakrabarti G, Abel ED, Litwin SE. Minimally invasive aortic banding in mice: effects of altered cardiomyocyte insulin signaling during pressure overload. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2003;285:H1261–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Reddy AK, Jones AD, Martono C, Caro WA, Madala S, Hartley CJ. Pulsed doppler signal processing for use in mice: design and evaluation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2005;52:1764–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Li YH, Reddy AK, Ochoa LN, et al. Effect of age on peripheral vascular response to transverse aortic banding in mice. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2003;58:B895–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hadi AM, Mouchaers KT, Schalij I, et al. Rapid quantification of myocardial fibrosis: a new macro-based automated analysis. Anal Cell Pathol 2010;33:257–69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Nakamura M, Sadoshima J. Mechanisms of physiological and pathological cardiac hypertrophy. Nat Rev Cardiol 2018;15:387–407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Rai V, Sharma P, Agrawal S, Agrawal DK. Relevance of mouse models of cardiac fibrosis and hypertrophy in cardiac research. Mol Cell Biochem 2017;424:123–45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Tannu S, Allocco J, Yarde M, Wong P, Ma X. Experimental model of congestive heart failure induced by transverse aortic constriction in BAFB/c mice. J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods 2020; 106:106935. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Martin TP, Robinson E, Harvey AP, et al. Surgical optimization and characterization of a minimally invasive aortic banding procedure to induce cardiac hypertrophy in mice. Exp Physiol 2012;97:822–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Liu B, Li A, Gao M, Qin Y, Gong G. Modified protocol for A mouse heart failure model using minimally invasive transverse aortic constriction. STAR Protoc 2020;1:100186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Mitsos S, Katsanos K, Dougeni E, Koletsis EN, Dougenis D. A critical appraisal of open- and closed-chest models of experimental myocardial ischemia. Lab Anim 2009;38:167–77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Knorring J, Lepäntalo M, Lindgren L, Lindfors O. Cardiac arrhythmias and myocardial ischemia after thoracotomy for lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 1992;53:642–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Bosch L, de Haan JJ, Bastemeijer M, et al. The transverse aortic constriction heart failure animal model: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Heart Fail Rev 2021;26:1515–24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Mohammed SF, Storlie JR, Oehler EA, et al. Variable phenotype in murine transverse aortic constriction. Cardiovasc Pathol 2012;21:188–98. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Wu J, You J, Li L, et al. Early estimation of left ventricular systolic pressure and prediction of successful aortic constriction in a mouse model of pressure overload by ultrasound biomicroscopy. Ultrasound Med Biol 2012;38:1030–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Lygate CA, Schneider JE, Hulbert K, et al. Serial high resolution 3D-MRI after aortic banding in mice: band internalization is a source of variability in the hypertrophic response. Basic Res Cardiol 2006;101:8–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Melleby AO, Romaine A, Aronsen JM, et al. A novel method for high precision aortic constriction that allows for generation of specific cardiac phenotypes in mice. Cardiovasc Res 2018;114:1680–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Reynolds JO, Quick AP, Wang Q, et al. Junctophilin-2 gene therapy rescues heart failure by normalizing RyR2-mediated Ca2+ release. Int J Cardiol 2016;225:371–80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Richards DA, Aronovitz MJ, Calamaras TD, et al. Distinct phenotypes induced by three degrees of transverse aortic constriction in mice. Sci Rep 2019;9:5844. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Rossi A, Cicoira M, Bonapace S, et al. Left atrial volume provides independent and incremental information compared with exercise tolerance parameters in patients with heart failure and left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Heart 2007;93:1420–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Hsiao CS, Hsiao SH, Chiou FR, Chiou KR. Early predicting improvement of severe systolic heart failure by left atrial volume. Heart Vessels 2023;38:523–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Hao Z, Xu G, Yuan M, et al. The predictive value of changes in left atrial volume index for rehospitalization in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Clin Cardiol 2023;46:151–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Pritchett AM, Mahoney DW, Jacobsen SJ, Rodeheffer RJ, Karon BL, Redfield MM. Diastolic dysfunction and left atrial volume: a population-based study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;45:87–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Sun Y, Chen X, Zhang Y, et al. Reverse atrial remodeling in heart failure with recovered ejection fraction. J Am Heart Assoc 2023;12:e026891. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Jong AM, Van Gelder IC, Vreeswijk-Baudoin I, Cannon MV, Van Gilst WH, Maass AH. Atrial remodeling is directly related to end-diastolic left ventricular pressure in a mouse model of ventricular pressure overload. PLoS One 2013;8:e72651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Kondo H, Abe I, Fukui A, et al. Possible role of rivaroxaban in attenuating pressure-overload-induced atrial fibrosis and fibrillation. J Cardiol 2018;71:310–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Yamaguchi N, Xiao J, Narke D, et al. Cardiac pressure overload decreases ETV1 expression in the left atrium, contributing to atrial electrical and structural remodeling. Circulation 2021;143:805–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Li Z, Liu Q, Liu F, et al. Atrial cardiomyopathy markers and new-onset atrial fibrillation risk in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Eur J Intern Med 2022;102:72–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Chen X, Lin G, Dai C, Xu K. Effect of estimated plasma volume status and left atrial diameter on prognosis of patients with acute heart failure. Front Cardiovasc Med 2023;10:1069864. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Zafar MR, Sharma A, Sunder SS, et al. Left atrial appendage volume as a prognostic Indicator of long-term mortality in Cancer survivors treated with thoracic radiation. Cardiooncology 2023;9:2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Poulsen MK, Dahl JS, Henriksen JE, et al. Left atrial volume index: relation to long-term clinical outcome in type 2 diabetes. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;62:2416–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Upon submission, authors agree to make any materials, data, code, and associated protocols available upon request.